The present invention relates to an improved technology of a torque distributor suitable for a transfer of a four-wheel-drive vehicle.
As a device for distributing a driving force, a torque distributor as disclosed in Patent document 1 is generally known. The torque distributor disclosed in Patent document 1 is configured to distribute torque (driving force) depending on a radial pressing force between rollers.
Citation List
Patent Literature
However, the previously-discussed prior-art torque distributor is designed such that the rollers are always loaded radially and held in contact with each other. Therefore, this type of torque distributor cannot be applied to a transfer of an automotive vehicle that requires switching operation between a two-wheel-drive mode and a four-wheel-drive mode.
It is, therefore, in view of the previously-described disadvantages of the prior art, an object of the invention to provide a torque distributor applicable to a transfer of an automotive vehicle that requires switching operation between a two-wheel-drive mode and a four-wheel-drive mode, by ON/OFF control for a capacity of torque transmitted between rollers.
In order to accomplish the aforementioned and other objects of the invention, as a prerequisite for a torque distributor, a torque distribution between primary drive wheels and secondary drive wheels is determined by distributing part of torque to be transmitted to the primary drive wheels to the secondary drive wheels, and the torque distributor includes a first roller rotatable together with a first rotary member, which constitutes a part of a torque-transmission path to the primary drive wheels, a second roller rotatable together with a second rotary member, which constitutes a part of a torque-transmission path to the secondary drive wheels, and a second-roller revolving mechanism for revolving the second roller in the direction opposite to the rotation direction of power transmission of the second roller around an eccentric-shaft axis which is offset from a rotation axis (a rotation center) of the second roller, so that the second roller is displaced from a non-power-transmission position, at which the second roller is spaced apart from the first roller, to a power-transmission position, at which the second roller is radially loaded and held in contact with the first roller.
Therefore, according to the torque distributor of the present invention, when the second roller is displaced from the non-power-transmission position, at which the second roller is spaced apart from the first roller, to the power-transmission position, at which the second roller is radially loaded and held in contact with the first roller, by revolving the second roller in the direction opposite to the rotation direction of power transmission of the second roller around the eccentric-shaft axis, part of torque to be transmitted to the primary drive wheels is directed and delivered from the first roller through the second roller to the secondary drive wheels, and the magnitude of torque delivered to the secondary drive wheels is determined depending on a radially-loaded contact state (i.e., depending on a contact pressure between the rollers in contact), thus enabling both the primary drive wheels and the secondary drive wheels, that is, the four road wheels, to be driven.
Conversely when the second roller is displaced from the power-transmission position, at which the second roller is radially loaded and held in contact with the first roller, to the non-power-transmission position, at which the second roller is held out of contact with the first roller, by revolving the second roller in the reverse-rotational direction around the eccentric-shaft axis, part of torque to be transmitted to the primary drive wheels cannot be directed and delivered from the first roller through the second roller to the secondary drive wheels, thus enabling the two-wheel-drive mode at which only the primary drive wheels are driven.
Therefore, the torque distributor of the invention enables an ON/OFF control action for a capacity of torque transmitted between the first and second rollers, and whereby the torque distributor can be applied to a transfer of an automotive vehicle that requires switching operation between a two-wheel-drive mode and a four-wheel-drive mode.
Detailed description will be made on a torque distributor according to the embodiment of the present invention in reference to the drawings.
<Construction>
The four-wheel-drive vehicle of
Torque distributor 1 is configured to determine a torque distribution between rear-left and rear-right road wheels (primary drive wheels) 6L-6R and front-left and front-right road wheels (secondary drive wheels) 9L-9R by distributing part of torque to be transmitted to rear-left and rear-right road wheels (primary drive wheels) 6L and 6R to front-left and front-right road wheels (secondary drive wheels) 9L and 9R. In the shown embodiment, torque distributor 1 is constructed as shown in
In
The two axial ends of input shaft 12 are sealed in a fluid-tight fashion by respective seal rings 27 and 28, and also protruded from the respective seal rings outside the housing 11. In the cross-sectional view, the left-hand end of input shaft 12 is connected to a transmission output shaft of transmission 3 (see
A first roller 31 is integrally formed with the axial intermediate portion of input shaft 12 and arranged concentrically with the axis of input shaft 12. A second roller 32 is integrally formed with the axial intermediate portion of output shaft 13 and arranged concentrically with the axis of output shaft 13. First and second rollers 31-32 are arranged to be perpendicular to both the input shaft 12 and the output shaft 13, and also aligned so as to be positioned within a common plane perpendicular to the input and output shafts and common to the two rollers.
Output shaft 13 is rotatably supported on the housing 11 indirectly via components as discussed below. That is, two hollow eccentric cranks (control cranks) 51L and 51R (hereinafter simply referred to as “cranks”) of an eccentric crank mechanism are laid out on both sides of second roller 32 integrally formed with the axial intermediate portion of output shaft 13 with clearance spaces. These cranks are mounted on both ends of output shaft 13. Bearings 52L and 52R are interleaved and fitted into the respective clearance spaces defined between the inner peripheral surfaces of central bores 51La and 51Ra (eccentric bores, each having a radius Ri) of cranks 51L and 51R and the outer peripheral surfaces of both ends of output shaft 13, for rotatably supporting the output shaft so as to permit free rotation of output shaft 13 about the geometric center O2 common to the two central bores.
As clearly shown in
Cranks 51L-51R are formed integral with respective ring gears 51Lc and 51Rc at the two adjacent ends of cranks 51L-51R, axially facing each other. These ring gears are arranged concentrically with eccentric outer peripheral portions 51Lb and 51Rb and have the same specification. A common crank-driving pinion 55 is kept in meshed-engagement with both the ring gears 51Lc-51Rc. When meshing, under a specified state where cranks 51L-51R are held at their angular positions that eccentric outer peripheral portions 51Lb-51Rb are circumferentially aligned with each other, the common crank-driving pinion 55 is brought into meshed-engagement with the two ring gears 51Lc-51Rc.
Crank-driving pinion 55 is fixedly connected to a pinion shaft 56. Both ends of pinion shaft 56 are rotatably supported on the housing 11 via bearings 56a and 56b. The right-hand end (viewing
Hence, when rotational position control for cranks 51L-51R is performed via pinion 55 and ring gears 51Lc-51Rc by means of roller contact-pressure control motor 45, the rotation axis O2 of second roller 32 as well as output shaft 13 is revolved and displaced along a locus circle a indicated by the broken line in
The left-hand ends (viewing
When interleaving seal rings 57-58, under a specified state where the center of inner-diameter and outer-diameter portions of the axial end of crank 51L, at which seal rings 57-58 are placed, is aligned eccentrically in the same eccentric direction as the supported portion of output shaft 13 rotatably supported, seal ring 57 is interleaved between the outer-diameter portion of the axial end of crank 51L and the housing 11, whereas seal ring 58 is interleaved between the inner-diameter portion of the axial end of crank 51L and the output shaft 13. With this seal-ring arrangement, it is possible to continuously produce a good sealing action at the protruded portion of output shaft 13 protruded outside the housing 11, regardless of a revolving displacement of the rotation axis O2 about the geometric center O3, arising from the revolving motion of the second roller 32, together with the output shaft 13.
<Torque-Distribution Control>
Details of driving-force distribution control (torque-distribution control) of the embodiment shown in
On the one hand, that is, in the case of a zero contact pressure between the rollers, torque, inputted from transmission 3 to input shaft 12, is just transmitted from the input shaft 12 through rear propeller shaft 4 and rear final drive unit 5 (see
On the other hand, that is, in the case that the roller-to-roller distance L1 becomes less than the summed value of the radius of first roller 31 and the radius of second roller 32 with elastic deformation of the first and second rollers 31-32 within their contact area under Hertzian contact (i.e., under elastic contact) by virtue of rotational position control for cranks 51L-51R via pinion 55 and ring gears 51Lc-51Rc by roller contact-pressure control motor 45, rollers 31-32 cooperate with each other to produce a transmitted torque capacity, which depends on the magnitude of contact pressure between the rollers. Hence, torque distributor 1 of the embodiment can direct, depending on the transmitted torque capacity, part of torque to be transmitted to rear-left and rear-right road wheels 6L-6R (primary drive wheels) via the first and second rollers 31-32 to output shaft 13.
Thereafter, the torque, directed to the output shaft, is transmitted from the left-hand end (viewing
In this manner, the vehicle can run in a four-wheel-drive mode at which all of rear-left and rear-right road wheels 6L-6R (primary drive wheels) and front-left and front-right road wheels 9L-9R (secondary drive wheels) can be driven.
During execution of roller-and-roller contact pressure control (roller-and-roller transmitted torque capacity control) performed by roller contact-pressure control motor 45, output shaft 13 and second roller 32 (that is, the rotation axis O2 of the second roller as well as the output shaft) are revolved and displaced around the eccentric-shaft axis O3(i.e., the geometric center of the eccentric-crank outer peripheral portions 51Lb-51Rb. However, such revolving motion of output shaft 13 and second roller 32 (that is, such revolving motion of the rotation axis O2 of the second roller as well as the output shaft) can be absorbed by means of a universal coupling installed between output shaft 13 and front propeller shaft 7. Thus, there is a less risk that torque transmission to front-left and front-right road wheels 9L-9R (secondary drive wheels) may be obstructed, even when an eccentric-shaft flexible coupling is not used.
<Regarding Direction of Revolving Motion of Second Roller During Torque-Distribution Control>
The previously-discussed torque-distribution control can be realized by revolving the second roller 32 (i.e., the rotation axis O2) by means of cranks 51L-51R in the same direction as the rotation direction of power transmission of the second roller 32, or by revolving the second roller 32 (i.e., the rotation axis O2) by means of cranks 51L-51R in the direction opposite to the rotation direction of power transmission of the second roller 32.
Hereinafter described is the former case that the second roller 32 (i.e., the rotation axis O2) is revolved in the same direction as the rotation direction of power transmission of the second roller 32.
Assuming that the rotation direction of power transmission of the second roller 32 is the direction denoted by the arrow “A2” in
At the BDC position of
When revolving the second roller 32 (i.e., the rotation axis O2) from the BDC position in the same direction (i.e., the counter-clockwise direction of the drawings) as the rotation direction “A2” of power transmission of the second roller 32, the second roller 32 comes into contact with the first roller 31 slightly before reaching the intermediate angular position of
According to a further development of revolving motion of the second roller 32 (i.e., the rotation axis O2) in the counter-clockwise direction via the intermediate angular positions of
The normal force Fa creates an angular moment Ma acting in the clockwise direction of
By the way, as can be appreciated from the locus α of revolving motion of the second-roller rotation axis O2, the arm length of angular moment Ma, created by normal force Fa, tends to vary like a quadratic curve. Thus, the magnitude of angular moment Ma tends to vary in the same manner (i.e., like a quadratic curve) as the characteristic curve of
On the other hand, the arm length of angular moment Mc, created by tangential force Fc, tends to be held approximately constant, since the respective tangential forces Fc have almost the same level concerning the point of tangential-force application. However, as seen from variations in vector lengths of the respective tangential forces Fc, the magnitude of tangential force Fc tends to vary. Thus, the magnitude of angular moment Mc also varies in the same tendencies as the tangential-force-Fc-variation characteristic shown in
The total angular moment M acting around the eccentric-shaft axis O3 during the previously-discussed torque-distribution control, is the summed value (Ma+Mc) of the angular moment Ma created by normal force Fa and the angular moment Mc created by tangential force Fc. The total angular moment M has a crank-rotation-angle θ versus angular-moment-M-variation tendency as shown in
Therefore, as can be appreciated from the widths of the arrows corresponding to the two different angular moments shown in
By the way, the angular moments Ma and Mc act in the opposite directions mutually, and hence the direction (i.e., the polarity) of the total angular moment M (=Ma+Mc), which is equal to the summed value of these angular moments Ma and Mc, is reversed just after a specified crank rotation angle θ1 of crank rotation angles θ in
This means that the direction of load on motor 45, which is provided to perform rotational position control for cranks 51L-51R, is reversed in the middle of torque-distribution control achieved based on control action for crank rotation angle θ, and whereby it is impossible to avoid the accuracy of torque-distribution control from being deteriorated.
Additionally, when the direction (the polarity) of the total angular moment M is reversed, there is another problem of hammering noise occurring owing to backlash at the meshed-engagement portions between the common crank-driving pinion 55 and ring gears 51Lc-51Rc constructing the rotational position control system for cranks 51L-51R.
In contrast to the above, hereinafter is the latter case that the second roller 32 (i.e., the rotation axis Oz) is revolved in the direction opposite to the rotation direction of power transmission of the second roller 32.
Assuming that, in the same manner as
At the BDC position of
When revolving the second roller 32 (i.e., the rotation axis Oz) from the BDC position in the direction (i.e., the clockwise direction of the drawings) opposite to the rotation direction “A2” of power transmission of the second roller 32, the second roller 32 comes into contact with the first roller 31 slightly before reaching the intermediate angular position of
According to a further development of revolving motion of the second roller 32 (i.e., the rotation axis O2) in the clockwise direction via the intermediate angular positions of
The normal force Fa creates an angular moment Ma acting in the counter-clockwise direction of
By the way, as can be appreciated from the locus α of revolving motion of the second-roller rotation axis O2, the arm length of angular moment Ma, created by normal force Fa, tends to vary like a quadratic curve. Thus, the magnitude of angular moment Ma tends to vary in the same manner (i.e., like a quadratic curve) as the characteristic curve shown in
On the other hand, the arm length of angular moment Mc, created by tangential force Fc, tends to be held approximately constant, since the respective tangential forces Fc have almost the same level concerning the point of tangential-force application. However, as seen from variations in vector lengths of the respective tangential forces Fc, the magnitude of tangential force Fc tends to vary. Thus, the magnitude of angular moment Mc also varies in the same tendencies as the tangential-force-Fc-variation characteristic shown in
The total angular moment M acting around the eccentric-shaft axis O3 during the previously-discussed torque-distribution control, is the summed value (Ma+Mc) of the angular moment Ma created by normal force Fa and the angular moment Mc created by tangential force Fc. The total angular moment M has a crank-rotation-angle θ versus angular-moment-M-variation tendency as indicated in
Therefore, as can be appreciated from the widths of the arrows corresponding to the two different angular moments shown in
By the way, the angular moments Ma and Mc act in the same direction, and hence the direction (i.e., the polarity) of the total angular moment M (=Ma+Mc), which is equal to the summed value of these angular moments Ma and Mc, is kept unchanged within the entire crank-rotation-angle-θ range of
This means that the direction of load on motor 45, which is provided to perform rotational position control for cranks 51L-51R, cannot be reversed in the middle of torque-distribution control achieved based on control action for crank rotation angle θ, and whereby it is possible to avoid a deterioration in the accuracy of torque-distribution control, which deterioration may occur owing to the reversal.
Additionally, the direction (the polarity) of the total angular moment M cannot be reversed and hence there is no reversal of the direction of torque-transmission at the meshed-engagement portions between the common crank-driving pinion 55 and ring gears 51Lc-51Rc constructing the rotational position control system for cranks 51L-51R. Thus, it is possible to avoid the problem of hammering noise occurring owing to backlash of the meshing gear.
On the basis of the above-mentioned fact-recognition, in executing torque-distribution control based on rotational position control for cranks 51L-51R (position control for revolving motion of second-roller rotation axis O2), performed by motor 45, during roller-and-roller radial-pressing-force increase control (i.e., during roller-and-roller contact pressure increase control), the torque distributor of the embodiment is configured to revolve the second roller 32 (i.e., the rotation axis O2) in the direction opposite to the rotation direction “A2” of power transmission of the second roller 32 via cranks 51L-51R by means of motor 45.
According to the torque distributor of the embodiment, when the second roller 32 is displaced from the non-power-transmission position of
Conversely when the second roller 32 is displaced from the power-transmission positions of
Therefore, the torque distributor of the embodiment enables an ON/OFF control action for a capacity of torque transmitted between the first and second rollers 31-32, and whereby the torque distributor can be applied to a transfer of an automotive vehicle that requires switching operation between a two-wheel-drive mode and a four-wheel-drive mode, without any problem.
Furthermore, in the shown embodiment, in executing torque-distribution control based on rotational position control for cranks 51L-51R (position control for revolving motion of second-roller rotation axis O2), performed by motor 45, during roller-and-roller radial-pressing-force increase control (i.e., during roller-and-roller contact pressure increase control), the torque distributor is configured to revolve the second roller 32 (i.e., the rotation axis O2) in the direction opposite to the rotation direction “A2” of power transmission of the second roller 32 via cranks 51L-51R by means of motor 45, and hence the torque distributor of the embodiment can provide the following operation and effects.
That is to say, when the direction of revolving motion of the second roller 32 (rotation axis O2) during roller-and-roller radial-pressing-force increase control is opposite to the rotation direction “A2” of power transmission of the second roller 32, an angular moment Ma created by a roller-and-roller radial pressing force (a normal force) Fa and an angular moment Mc created by a tangential force Fc act in the same direction. Hence, even when the relation of management (concerning torque-distribution control) between the two different moments Ma-Mc is changed as discussed previously in reference to
Therefore, the direction of load on motor 45, which is provided to perform rotational position control for cranks 51L-51R, cannot be reversed in the middle of torque-distribution control achieved based on control action for crank rotation angle θ, and whereby it is possible to avoid a deterioration in the accuracy of torque-distribution control, which deterioration may occur owing to the reversal, thus enabling execution of high-precision torque-distribution control.
Additionally, the direction (the polarity) of the total angular moment M cannot be reversed and hence there is no reversal of the direction of torque-transmission at the meshed-engagement portions between the common crank-driving pinion 55 and ring gears 51Lc-51Rc constructing the rotational position control system for cranks 51L-51R. Thus, it is possible to avoid the problem of hammering noise occurring owing to backlash of the meshing gear.
In the shown embodiment, as previously discussed in reference to
In the case of the torque-distribution system as clearly shown in
In contrast to the above, in the case of the system that the angle range of revolution of the second roller around the eccentric-shaft axis is set to be less than 180° and the direction of revolution of the second roller is limited to a single direction, it is impossible to control the direction of revolution of the second roller around the eccentric-shaft axis in the direction opposite to the direction of rotation of the second roller in both a forward-running state and a reverse-running state. Hence, such a system has to be configured such that the direction of revolution of the second roller around the eccentric-shaft axis can be controlled in the direction opposite to the direction of rotation of the second roller only in a forward-running state having a higher operating frequency rather than a reverse-running state.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2009-011477 | Jan 2009 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2009/070459 | 12/7/2009 | WO | 00 | 8/8/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/084667 | 7/29/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2416495 | Piasse | Feb 1947 | A |
3378093 | Hill | Apr 1968 | A |
3475993 | Hewko | Nov 1969 | A |
4014224 | Pitts | Mar 1977 | A |
4483055 | Sekimoto et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4559846 | Cochran et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4656891 | Durand | Apr 1987 | A |
4782721 | Dick | Nov 1988 | A |
4901598 | Batchelor et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4907472 | Mura | Mar 1990 | A |
5054335 | Andrews | Oct 1991 | A |
5167589 | Wawrzyniak et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5518464 | Teraoka | May 1996 | A |
6199653 | Matsufuji et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6238317 | Brown et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6438480 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440030 | Minegishi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6482121 | Okoshi | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6551211 | Kanazawa | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6719658 | Haga et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6849025 | Chikaraishi et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6955623 | Pattok | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7387588 | Bader | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7441634 | Yamamoto | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7575535 | Yamamoto | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7628722 | Yoshimura | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8187134 | Mori et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8316738 | Hellinger et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8402851 | Mori et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20020022546 | Okoshi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020124686 | Ohtani et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147068 | Chikaraishi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040198549 | Wafzig | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050143211 | Yamamoto | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050266954 | Yoshimura | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080064553 | Newton | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100276246 | Mori et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120089310 | Sakagami et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 167 553 | Apr 1964 | DE |
1 808 617 | Jul 2007 | EP |
02-033956 | Mar 1990 | JP |
6-74311 | Mar 1994 | JP |
2001-341539 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-31202 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-087091 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-087092 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-349653 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002-349653 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002-349654 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-028251 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-247617 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-306948 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-188701 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-188701 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-337442 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-132738 | May 2006 | JP |
WO 2009081876 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
USPTO, Final Office action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,255, Jun. 5, 2013, 21 pages. |
USPTO, Adivsory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,255, Aug. 14, 2013, 2 pages. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,255, Dec. 27, 2012, 18 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120264557 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |