Provided are devices and methods for limiting the rotational force imparted on an imaging probe spinning inside a patient to reduce the likelihood of an unsafe condition should the imaging probe suddenly bind.
Imaging of body lumens (e.g., vasculature) can require relatively high torque and relatively high rotational speeds to spin an imaging probe, such as an optical coherence tomography (OCT) probe, inside the body lumen. Generally, an OCT imaging probe is inserted in a body lumen of a patient and a motor located outside the patient spins a torque wire which is connected to the OCT imaging probe. OCT imaging systems have unique torque wire requirements as the optical fiber rotates inside of the torque wire, adding mass and stiffness. However, high torque and high speed rotation can pose a significant risk of patient harm should the OCT probe unexpectedly bind because the motor will continue spinning the torque wire, causing the torque wire to twist on itself and spin the catheter sheath which encloses the torque wire inside the body lumen, potentially causing patient harm.
In one aspect, the invention relates to an apparatus including a torque wire connected to an imaging probe; and a torque limiter defining a bore, a first end of the torque limiter being in mechanical communication with a motor, a second end of the torque limiter being in mechanical communication with the torque wire, the optical fiber being disposed through the bore of the torque limiter. The torque limiter includes a member defining at least one cutout which causes the torque limiter to break when rotational force on the torque wire exceeds a predetermined amount, thereby decoupling the motor from the torque wire.
In another aspect, the invention provides an apparatus including: (a) a torque wire connected to an optical coherence tomography imaging probe; and (b) a torque limiter defining a bore, a first end of the torque limiter being in mechanical communication with a motor, a second end of the torque limiter being in mechanical communication with the torque wire, the torque wire being disposed through the bore of the torque limiter, the torque limiter comprising a member defining at least one cutout which causes the torque limiter to break when rotational force on the torque wire exceeds a predetermined amount, thereby decoupling the motor from the torque wire.
In another aspect, the invention provides an apparatus including: (a) a first member defining a bore; (b) a second member defining a bore, the first member and the second member being adjacent to one another, the bore of the first member being in concentric alignment with the bore of the second member; (c) a torque wire disposed in the bore of the first member and in the bore of the second member; and (d) a third member defining a bore, the second member and a least a portion of the first member being disposed in the bore of the third member, the third member being attached to the first member at a first attachment point of the third member, the third member being attached to the torque wire at a second attachment point of the third member, the second member disposed between the first attachment point and the second attachment point, the third member comprising at least one cutout between the first attachment point and the second attachment point. Thus, rotational force which is imparted on the first member is transferred to the torque wire, and the third member breaks and decouples the first member from the torque wire when the rotational force on the torque wire exceeds a predetermined amount.
In another aspect, the invention provides an apparatus including: (a) a first member defining an axial bore; (b) a second member defining an axial bore in concentric alignment with the axial bore of the first member, the second member comprising a proximal end defining a first outer diameter and a distal end defining a second outer diameter, the second outer diameter being larger than the first outer diameter, the axial bore of the first member configured to concentrically receive the proximal end of the second member; (c) a torque wire disposed in the axial bore of the first member and the axial bore of second member; and (d) a third member defining an axial bore which concentrically receives at least a portion of the first member and the second member, the third member being attached to the first member at a first attachment point of the third member, the third member being attached to the torque wire at a second attachment point of the third member, the second member disposed between the first attachment point and the second attachment point, the third member comprising at least one cutout between the first attachment point and the second attachment point. Thus, rotational force which is imparted on the first member is transferred to the torque wire, and the third member breaks and decouples the first member from the torque wire when the rotational force on the torque wire exceeds a predetermined amount.
Embodiments of the apparatus can include one or more of the following features.
In some embodiments, the first member comprises metal, such as, for example, Nitinol.
In some embodiments, the second member reduces flexure between the first attachment point and the second attachment point.
In some embodiments, the third member comprises poly(ethylene terephthalate), and in some embodiments the poly(ethylene terephthalate) has a fracture strength of about 0.05 oz-in.
In some embodiments, the third member comprises two or more cutouts.
In some embodiments, the torque wire defines an axial bore and the apparatus comprises an optical fiber disposed in the bore.
In some embodiments, the optical fiber comprises glass fiber, and in some embodiments, the optical fiber stretches in the axial direction less than about 0.005 inches.
The objects and features of the invention can be better understood with reference to the drawings described below. The drawings are not necessarily to drawn to scale; emphasis is placed instead being placed on illustrating the principles of the invention. In the drawings, numerals are used to indicate specific parts throughout the various views. The drawings associated with the disclosure are addressed on an individual basis within the disclosure as they are introduced.
The following description refers to the accompanying drawings that illustrate certain embodiments of the invention. Other embodiments are possible and modifications may be made to the embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, the following detailed description is not meant to limit the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims.
The use of headings and sections in the application is not meant to limit the invention; each section can apply to any aspect, embodiment, or feature of the invention.
The order of steps in the methods described herein is immaterial so long as the invention remains operable. Moreover, two or more steps may be conducted simultaneously or in a different order than recited herein unless otherwise specified.
Where a range or list of values is provided, each intervening value between the upper and lower limits of that range or list of values is individually contemplated and is encompassed within the invention as if each value were specifically enumerated herein. In addition, smaller ranges between and including the upper and lower limits of a given range are contemplated and encompassed within the invention. The listing of exemplary values or ranges is not a disclaimer of other values or ranges between and including the upper and lower limits of a given range.
The use of the singular herein includes the plural (and vice versa) unless specifically stated otherwise. Moreover, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural forms unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. In addition, where the use of the term “about” is before a quantitative value, the present teachings also include the specific quantitative value itself, unless specifically stated otherwise. As used herein, the term “about” refers to a ±10% variation from the nominal value, unless otherwise indicated or inferred.
It should be understood that the order of steps or order for performing certain actions is immaterial so long as the present teachings remain operable. Moreover, two or more steps or actions may be conducted simultaneously. The invention provides, in part, OCT imaging systems that incorporate a torque limiter which reduces the chance of patient injury should the OCT imaging probe unexpectedly bind. In some embodiments, this is accomplished by using a torque limiter to couple the torque wire to a drive member, such as a tube, which is in communication with the motor. Specifically, the torque limiter is configured to deliberately break or fail when the system experiences torsional forces above a predetermined amount or threshold. Upon breakage or failure of the torque limiter, the motor becomes disconnected from the torque wire, allowing the torque wire and imaging probe to slow down or stop independent of the rotational speed of the motor.
In some embodiments, the imaging probe is carried in a delivery catheter. Once at the imaging site, the rotating imaging probe is then pulled back rapidly towards the body entry point. As a result, the imaging core is therefore subject to axial and torsional stresses during pullback.
Thus, the invention also provides, in part, an OCT imaging system which separates torsional and tensile forces, thereby permitting optimum functionality and relatively inexpensive manufacturing. In some embodiments, the torsional forces required to spin the imaging probe are transmitted primarily via the torque limiter and/or the torque wire, while the tensile forces required to withdraw or pull back the probe are transmitted primarily by an optical fiber disposed in the torque wire. These embodiments are beneficial because the torque limiter and torque wire can be designed for optimal torsional strength at the expense of having significant tensile strength. It also allows the torque limiter of the break away section to be relatively inexpensive to manufacture. In some embodiments, the optical fiber can have optimal tensile strength at the expense of having significant torsional strength; this further reduces manufacturing cost and improves the reliability of the torque limiter. For example, in some embodiments the optical fiber is configured to stretch in the axial direction less than about 0.005 inches and, more preferably, less than about 0.001 inches.
An OCT system generally comprises an imaging core that is mechanically coupled to a motor which spins one or more components of the imaging core.
With further reference to
Referring to
In some embodiments, the spacer 208 and tube 108 are not attached to one another. Instead, a cylindrical torque limiter 112 is positioned over the area of overlap between the tube 108 and spacer 208. The proximal end 112a of the torque limiter 112 is glued 224 to the tube 108 and the distal end of the torque limiter 112b is glued 228 to the torque wire. The inclusion of the spacer helps to prevent glue migration between the tube 108 and the torque wire 116, and also helps to stiffen the break away joint and prevent premature breakage of the torque limiter 112. Thus, as the tube 108 rotates, torque is transferred by the torque limiter 112 to the torque wire. In some embodiments, the distal end 112b of the torque limiter 112 is glued to the spacer 208 and the distal end of the spacer 208, in turn, is glued to the torque wire 116. Thus, as the tube 208 rotates, the torque wire 116 also rotates. UV glue is useful for gluing the torque limiter 112 to tube 108 and the spacer 208 because UV glue, due to its rapid cure time, can be cured with minimal migration.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The strength of the torque limiter 112 can be controlled by its cross-sectional area, thickness, cutout size, and/or geometry. Large cutouts or more cutouts reduce the amount of material in a given cross-section and therefore will reduce the torsional strength of the torque limiter 112. Similarly, wall thickness of the torque limiter 112 will also affect its breaking strength. In a preferred embodiment, the torque limiter 112 has an inside diameter of about 0.043±0.002 inches and a wall thickness of about 0.001 inches. In some embodiments, the torque limiter 112 has a minimum length of about 0.5 cm and can be, for example, between about 0.5 cm to about 10.0 cm in length. In a preferred embodiment, the torque limiter 112 is about 3.0 cm in length. In some embodiments, the cutouts 230, 230′ are substantially circular. In a preferred embodiment, there are two substantially circular cutouts 230, 230′ which are sized such that the cutouts are separated by about 350 μm of material 236. As will be appreciated, a variety of cutout shapes, number, and arrangements can be employed to similar effect.
The torque limiter 112 can be made of any suitable material which can withstand significant rotational force and yet reliably break when a threshold amount of torque is experienced. In some embodiments, the torque limiter 112 is made of plastic such as, for example, poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). In a preferred embodiment, the PET has fracture strength of about 0.05 oz-in.
Thus, in use, if the torque wire 116 being spun by the tube 108, binds within the channel in which it is positioned, the torque wire 116 slows or stops and causes the glued end 224 of the spacer 208 to slow or stop. However, the tube 108 continues to rotate and thereby causes the other end of the torque limiter 112 to attempt to continue to spin. This causes a strong torque within the body of the torque limiter 112. This torque causes the torque limiter 112 to experience shear at the cutouts 230, 230′. The shearing of the torque limiter 112 permits the tube 108 end of the torque limiter 112 to continue to rotate while permitting the spacer end 208 of the torque limiter 112 to stop. This prevents the transmission of torque to the torque wire 116 and prevents the bound torque wire 116 from damaging the location in the channel in which the torque wire binds or any other location in the body.
Although shown as having one or more cutouts 230, 230′, the torque limiter may take on other forms. Referring to
In some embodiments, as an additional safeguard the glue used on the torque limiter 112 is designed to fail when a threshold amount of torque is experienced. This can be accomplished by, for example, using less glue and/or low-strength glue, such as, for example, thread locker glue. Appropriate controls can be used to provide repeatable glue coverage to reduce variability.
The optical fiber passes through the torque limiter section of the imaging core and can add significant axial strength. In some embodiments, the optical fiber has a small diameter, and therefore does not provide significant additional torsional strength to the torque limiter and thus does not interfere in its break away function. The optical fiber can be made of silica glass, which has a very high tensile strength. The optical fiber also transmits imaging data from the imaging probe to the optical connector. Data transmission is not compromised by the axial stresses of normal operation.
As will be appreciated, if an optical fiber is not present in the imaging core, a different tensile member may be used that possesses high axial strength but low torsional strength, such as glass and carbon fiber. Preferably, the material is brittle to cause it to break in torsion rather than wind up on itself.
Referring again to
S=F*L*A/E
Ideally, for a given axial friction force F, the stretch, S, on the torque limiter section is as small as possible because excess stretch can compromise the integrity of the torque limiter. Generally, A and E are set by optical requirements and other mechanical requirements, although there is some flexibility on the optical fiber diameter, which affects A. Thus, the distance between the optical fiber attachment points, L, is a variable that can be controlled to change the stretch on the torque limiter. Accordingly, in some embodiments, additional intermediate fiber attachment points may be incorporated in the design to reduce the stretch, S, on the fiber. For example, intermediate attachment points may be added just distal and proximal to the torque limiter to minimize S. While this would provide the minimum stretch for a given axial force, it has a disadvantage in that the fiber will take up a significant torsional load before the torque limiter joint fails.
With the disclosed PET material, the torque limiter will fail when twisted through about 15°. In addition, the fiber's contribution to torque is given by:
T=Theta*J*G/L
Thus, in order to minimize the optical fiber's contribution to the torsional strength of the imaging core, the distance between the attachment points should be as far apart as possible. In practice, with the attachment points 124a and 124b as shown in
By controlling the location of the fiber attachments in the current disclosure, the torque limiter 112 will break at a much smaller wind up than the optical fiber 124 will break. After the torque limiter 112 breaks, the optical fiber 124 takes up all the torque and will break at a lower torque than the torque limiter 112. In some embodiments, the native optical fiber 124 is weak enough that it does not need to be spliced and/or include its own break away joint.
In some embodiments, the optical fiber reduces axial strain on the torque limiter. However, axial stress and torsional stress on the torque limiter can be further decoupled by using helical cutouts in the torque limiter, as shown in
Referring back to
In the description, the invention is discussed in the context of optical coherency tomography imaging of a body lumen. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention can also be used in conjunction with other endoluminal devices and procedures (e.g., intravascular ultrasound) incorporating torque wires or other rotating components.
The aspects, embodiments, features, and examples of the invention are to be considered illustrative in all respects and are not intended to limit the invention, the scope of which is defined only by the claims. Other embodiments, modifications, and usages will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3306291 | Burke | Feb 1967 | A |
4434904 | D'Amico et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4669999 | Miller | Jun 1987 | A |
4971267 | Fulton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5185004 | Lashinski | Feb 1993 | A |
5228441 | Lundquist | Jul 1993 | A |
5321501 | Swanson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5368480 | Balfour et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5459570 | Swanson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465147 | Swanson | Nov 1995 | A |
5509093 | Miller et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5596996 | Johanson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5619368 | Swanson | Apr 1997 | A |
5748598 | Swanson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5784352 | Swanson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5913437 | Ma | Jun 1999 | A |
5956355 | Swanson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6111645 | Tearney et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134003 | Tearney et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160826 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6191862 | Swanson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6282011 | Tearney et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6421164 | Tearney et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6445939 | Swanson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6485413 | Boppart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501551 | Tearney et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6552796 | Magnin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6564087 | Pitris et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570659 | Schmitt | May 2003 | B2 |
6582368 | Holdaway et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6706004 | Tearney et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6879851 | McNamara et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891984 | Petersen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7066819 | Ueda et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7121947 | Ueda et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7208333 | Flanders et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7231243 | Tearney et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241286 | Atlas | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7311625 | Nosaka et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7407440 | White | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7414779 | Huber et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415049 | Flanders et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7625366 | Atlas | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7813609 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7848791 | Schmitt et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7916387 | Schmitt | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7935060 | Schmitt et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20020151799 | Pantages et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161351 | Samson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040186368 | Ramzipoor et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215166 | Atlas | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050201662 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060095065 | Tanimura et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060241503 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070232892 | Hirota | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070232893 | Tanioka | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260198 | Atlas | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260227 | Phan | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080161696 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165366 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090174931 | Huber et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090306520 | Schmitt et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100076320 | Petersen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094127 | Xu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100253949 | Adler et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110007315 | Petersen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110071404 | Schmitt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071405 | Judell et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101207 | Schmitt | May 2011 | A1 |
20110151980 | Petroff | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0445918 | Sep 1991 | EP |
07-184888 | Jul 1995 | JP |
10-66696 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2007139457 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008121234 | Oct 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110151980 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |