This disclosure generally relates to torque-limiting surgical driver devices, systems, and methods, such as torque-limiting surgical drivers for use in orthopedic surgeries.
In certain surgical procedures, medical professionals (for example, surgeons) utilize hand-powered instruments to drill into a bone of a patient. As powered surgical instruments have become more commonplace, medical professionals have moved away from manual surgical drilling instruments and methods when drilling and driving into patient bone. Powered surgical instruments operate at much higher speeds than hand-actuated, manual surgical instruments. However, while such powered instruments provide many benefits, it is difficult for medical professionals to determine when a drill bit has transitioned through different layers of the bones and/or when a drill bit has penetrated through the entirety of the bone cross-section.
It can be beneficial to detect when a surgical drill is presently drilling through particular layers of bone, transitions between different layers of the bone, and/or has penetrated through an entirety of a cross-section of bone. Such detection can avoid or reduce potential damage to tissue proximate to a patient's bone, such as tissue or nearby organs. For example, it can be beneficial for a surgical drill to differentiate between varying densities of bone in order to provide continuous feedback as to the current location of a drill bit within the bone. Such “tissue differentiation” or “density differentiation” can help avoid “plunging” of the drill bit through and/or outside the bone which can cause damage to tissue proximate or adjacent the bone. This can be accomplished with a surgical driver that monitors the torque applied to the drill bit and stops or reduces the rotation of the drill bit when certain torque criteria are satisfied. For example, the criteria can include the amount of torque being applied, how the torque is changing over time (e.g., whether the torque is consistently or inconsistently increasing or decreasing), how current torque values compare with previously-measured torque values and/or thresholds. Certain comparisons or thresholds of measured torque values can aid in determining whether present or recent torque values being sensed are indicative of the drill bit being located (or drilling through) a harder portion of the bone, which can in turn indicate that the drill bit is about to exit the bone cross-section. Additionally or alternatively, certain comparisons or thresholds of measured torque values can aid in determining whether present or recent torque values being sensed indicate that the drill bit has breached the bone. As discussed further below, the surgical driver can detect whether the drill bit is drilling through, or has drilled through, the harder (cortical) portion of the bone around the softer (cancellous) portion of the bone, and/or whether the drill bit has drilled through one or both of the entry and exit portions of the harder (cortical) portion. Some embodiments are configured to detect that the drill bit has passed through a softer tissue and then to stop upon, or soon after, encountering and/or beginning to drill into a harder tissue. For example, to detect that the drill bit has passed through a spinal disk and is at a vertebrae. Certain embodiments operate with algorithms such as those described herein, but without those steps that relate to and/or are dependent on detecting a first cortical layer of bone.
Various surgical drivers and associated systems and methods are disclosed that address one or more of the concerns discussed above, or other concerns. Embodiments of the surgical drivers, systems, and methods can be used for many different procedures, such as reconstructive, clavicle, craniomaxillofacial, thoracic, spinal, fracture repair, and extremity surgical approaches, among others. Further, in the reconstructive process, embodiments can be used for joint replacements (such as for patients suffering from arthritis), reconstructive orthopedics can restore the function of joints by replacing them. This can include knee, hip, and shoulder surgeries, though other surgeries can be used as well. Fracture repair can be used with respect to bones experiencing trauma, such as large bones like the femur. Further, extremities can be reconstructive, which can include joints such as ankles, writs, hands, fingers, feet, and toes. Each of the determined torque values can vary depending on the particular application, such as those discussed above. Embodiments can be used in the orthopedic realm and outside the orthopedic realm.
Some embodiments are configured to identify differentiations in torque characteristics. In some embodiments, the surgical driver can differentiate different bodily tissue (e.g., different bone tissues) so that the user will know where they are operating (e.g., where the tip of the drill bit is located). In certain embodiments, the surgical driver is configured to reduce or avoid breaching of a bone (e.g., a clavicle), such as with a drill bit.
The surgical driver can include a body and a motor. The motor can be operably connected to a drive head at a distal end of the surgical driver such that the motor can turn the drive head. The drive head can receive a drill bit. The drill bit can be positioned at a desired drill location on a substrate (e.g., a bone) and the motor can be operated to drive the drill bit into a substrate. Various embodiments of the surgical driver can limit and/or control torque applied to the drill bit. Certain embodiments reduce the speed of the drill bit during the drilling process. Various embodiments provide one or more of the advantages described above, or other advantages.
In some embodiments, a powered device (such as a surgical driver) can be capable of determining torque (e.g., by reading current and/or voltage) and a controller (either inside the device or outside the device) can be configured to implement torque-limiting functionality. In some embodiments, the device can be programmed to use current, voltage, and/or torque values to identify the substrate through which the drill bit is drilling and manage drive velocity accordingly. In some embodiments, the device can be programmed to use current, voltage, and/or torque values to identify changes in the drill bit path through more or less dense materials (such as through harder or softer portions of a bone). In some embodiments, the device can identify cortical and cancellous bone using discrete current, voltage, and/or torque values and can use the values to interpret the current substrate of the drill bit and control the powered device accordingly. For example, some implementations are configured to stop the device if a higher density tissue type is detected, such as a cortical portion of a bone.
Disclosed herein are embodiments of a torque-limiting surgical driver comprising: a body comprising a handle that is configured to be grasped by a user; a motor positioned in the body; a drive head configured to be rotated by the motor and to receive a drill bit; a power source configured to provide electric power to the motor; and a processor positioned in the body. In some embodiments, under the control of the processor, the torque-limiting surgical driver is configured to: apply torque to the drill bit to drill into a bone; monitor current or voltage supplied to the motor; determine, from the current or voltage supplied to the motor, torque values applied to the drill bit as the drill bit drills through the bone; and determine that a torque-limiting condition is satisfied. In some embodiments, the determining that the torque-limiting condition is satisfied comprises: determining that the drill bit has drilled in or through a first cortical layer of the bone; and determining that the drill bit has drilled through a second cortical layer of the bone; and in response to determining that the torque-limiting condition is satisfied, stopping the application of torque to the drill bit.
In some embodiments, the torque-limiting surgical driver is configured to determine whether the drill bit has drilled in or through the first cortical portion of the bone by comparing a difference between a first pair of consecutive torque values to a first threshold. In some embodiments, the torque-limiting surgical driver is configured to determine whether the drill bit has drilled in or through the first cortical portion of the bone by further comparing a difference between a second pair of consecutive torque values to the first threshold. In some embodiments, if the difference between the first pair of consecutive torque values is not greater than or equal to the first threshold, the torque-limiting surgical driver is further configured to compare a difference between a first pair of non-consecutive torque values with a second threshold, wherein the second threshold is greater than the first threshold. In some embodiments, if the difference between the first pair of non-consecutive torque values is not greater than or equal to the second threshold, the torque-limiting surgical driver is further configured to compare a second pair of non-consecutive torque values with the second threshold.
In some embodiments, the torque-limiting surgical driver is further configured to determine at least one of: whether the drill bit has drilled through an entry point of the second cortical portion of the bone; and whether the drill bit is drilling in the second cortical portion of the bone. In some embodiments, the torque-limiting surgical driver is configured to determine whether the drill bit has drilled through the entry point of the second cortical portion of the bone by comparing a difference between a second pair of consecutive torque values to a second threshold, the second pair of consecutive torque values obtained after the first pair of consecutive torque values. In some embodiments, the second threshold is equal to a percentage of an average of a subset of all the determined torque values. In some embodiments, the subset of all of the determined torque values is equal to all of the determined torque values that are greater than or equal to a third threshold, wherein the third threshold is indicative of drilling through a material other than air. In some embodiments, the torque-limiting surgical driver is configured to determine whether the drill bit is drilling in the second cortical portion of the bone by comparing a difference between a current torque value and a maximum measured torque value to a second threshold.
In some embodiments, in response to a determination that the drill bit has drilled through the entry point of the second cortical portion of the bone or a determination that the drill bit is drilling in the second cortical portion of the bone, the torque-limiting surgical driver is further configured to determine an average torque value, the average torque value representative of the torque values measured when the drill bit is drilling in the second cortical portion of the bone. In some embodiments, the torque-limiting surgical driver is further configured to determine a difference between a first torque value and the average torque value, the first torque value being a current torque value measured by the torque-limiting surgical driver.
In some embodiments, the surgical driver is configured to limit the amount of torque applied to the drill bit in response to a determination that the first torque value is less than the average torque value. In some embodiments, the torque-limiting surgical driver is further configured to: determine a difference between a second torque value and the average torque value, the second torque value measured prior to the first torque value; and limit the amount of torque applied to the drill bit in response to a determination that both of the first and second torque values are less than the average torque value.
Disclosed herein are methods of controlling a torque-limiting driver to limit the amount of torque applied to a drill bit after breaching a bone. In some embodiments, the torque-limiting driver comprises a body with a handle, a motor positioned in the body, a drive head that is configured to receive a drill bit and to be rotated by the motor so as to enable the drill bit to drill into the bone, and a processor. In some embodiments, under the control of the processor the method comprises: driving the drill bit into the bone, wherein the bone comprises a first cortical layer, a second cortical layer, and a cancellous layer in between the first and second cortical layers; detecting torque values when the drill bit is drilling into the bone; determining whether the drill bit has drilled in the first cortical layer of the bone; determining whether the drill bit has drilled through and exited the second cortical layer of the bone; and in response to determining that the drill bit has drilled through and exited the second cortical layer of the bone, stopping the driving of the drill bit. In some embodiments, the step of determining whether the drill bit has drilled in the first cortical layer of the bone comprises comparing a difference between a first pair of consecutive torque values to a first threshold. In some embodiments, the method further comprises determining at least one of: whether the drill bit has drilled through an entry point of the second cortical layer of the bone; and whether the drill bit is drilling in the second cortical layer of the bone.
In some embodiments, in response to a determination that the drill bit has drilled through the entry point of the second cortical layer of the bone or a determination that the drill bit is drilling in the second cortical layer of the bone, the method further comprises determining an average torque value, the average torque value representative of torque values measured when the drill bit is drilling in the second cortical layer of the bone. In some embodiments, the method further comprises determining a difference between a first torque value and the average torque value, the first torque value being a current torque value measured by the torque-limiting surgical driver. In some embodiments, the method further comprises limiting the amount of torque applied to the drill bit in response to a determination that the first torque value is less than the average torque value.
Any of the structures, materials, steps, or other features disclosed above, or disclosed elsewhere herein, can be used in any of the embodiments in this disclosure. Any structure, material, step, or other feature of any embodiment can be combined with any structure, material, step, or other feature of any other embodiment to form further embodiments, which are part of this disclosure.
The preceding summary is meant to be a high-level summary of certain features within the scope of this disclosure. The summary, the following detailed description, and the associated drawings do not limit or define the scope of protection. The scope of protection is defined by the claims. No feature is critical or indispensable.
Certain features of this disclosure are described below with reference to the drawings. The illustrated embodiments are intended to illustrate, but not to limit the embodiments. Various features of the different disclosed embodiments can be combined to form further embodiments, which are part of this disclosure.
Various features and advantages of the disclosed technology will become more fully apparent from the following description of the several specific embodiments illustrated in the figures. These embodiments are intended to illustrate the principles of this disclosure. However, this disclosure should not be limited to only the illustrated embodiments. The features of the illustrated embodiments can be modified, combined, removed, and/or substituted as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon consideration of the principles disclosed herein.
Overview of the Surgical Driver
Various embodiments of torque-limiting devices, systems, and methods are disclosed. For purposes of presentation, the devices are called “surgical drivers.” A surgical driver can be any powered device capable of drilling a drill bit into, for example, a bone of a patient. Several embodiments are configured to drive drill bits into a bone. However, the features, characteristics, and/or operation of the surgical drivers described herein can be applicable in other contexts. For example, the features, characteristics, and/or operation of the surgical drivers described herein can be applicable to drive screws into a bone. Additionally, while the phrase “surgical driver” is used herein, such phrase does not limit this disclosure only to “surgical” contexts. Rather, the devices, methods, systems, features, characteristics, and/or operations discussed herein can be applicable to other contexts as well.
As more fully described below, the devices, systems, and methods can determine when to stop a drill bit being driven into various types and/or layers of bone so as to avoid “plunging” through the bone and potentially damaging nearby tissue. The term “plunging” refers to when a drill bit transitions from a state where it is drilling through bone to a state where it breaches the bone and advances away from the bone and into and/or through nearby tissue proximate to the bone.
Certain embodiments of the disclosed surgical drivers can be used, for example, as a powered surgical device in an on-plane form factor, a powered surgical device in an on-plane form factor for clavicle applications, a powered surgical device in an on-plane form factor for spinal applications, a powered surgical device in an on-plane form factor for extremities, and/or a powered surgical device in an on-plane form factor for large bone. The surgical drivers can be used for other procedures as well, and the particular procedure is not limiting. In some embodiments, the surgical driver can be operated remotely, for example, through the use of robotics.
As shown in
In some variants, the motor 12 is powered by a power source, such as a source of AC or DC electrical power. In some embodiments, the motor 12 is powered by an on-board power source 28, such as a battery, capacitor, or otherwise. In some embodiments, the motor 12 is configured to receive power from an external source, such as from a console, wall socket, or other external power source. In some embodiments, the motor 12 is a brushless DC motor. In some embodiments, the motor 12 is a three-phase electric motor. The motor 12 can include one or more hall sensors, which can send signals to the controller 20 to enable the controller 20 to determine the number of revolutions of the motor 12. In certain variants, the controller 20 determines the number of revolutions of the bit 200 from the number of revolutions of the motor 12.
The surgical driver 100 can monitor and/or limit the torque that the surgical driver 100 is applying to the drill bit 200 during the drilling process. For example, as described in more detail below, the surgical driver 100 can include a sensor 18 that senses the current supplied to the motor 12. The sensor 18 can send such data to a controller 20, which can include a processor 22 coupled with a memory 24, along with other electronic components. Because, in some implementations, the current supplied to the motor 12 can be proportional to the torque applied to the drill bit 200, the controller 20 can dynamically determine the amount of torque being applied to the drill bit 200. In certain variants, the controller 20 is configured to determine or receive signals indicative of one or more of the following data features: current supplied to the motor 12, number of revolutions of the drill bit 200 and/or motor 12, speed of the motor 12, or otherwise.
As described in more detail below, various embodiments of the surgical driver 100 can include one or more algorithms adapted to limit and/or control the torque applied to a drill bit 200. The algorithms can be included in the memory 24 as program code 26 to be implemented on a computer-readable non-transitory medium. The processor 22 can execute the program code 26 to perform various operations, such as determining a torque limit, instructing the motor 12 to cease operation, instructing a power source 28 to reduce and/or stop providing power to the motor 12, or other operations. The processor 22 and/or program code 26 can control and/or implement any of the features described in this disclosure, such as any of the torque-limiting features. Some implementations are configured to stop the rotation of the drill bit 200 by shutting-off (e.g., substantially or totally) the power to the motor 12. Certain implementations include a brake to actively decelerate the motor 12 or components. For example, some implementations include a friction or electromagnetic brake.
In various embodiments, the surgical driver 100 can include one or more computers or computing devices that implement the various functions described herein under the control of program modules stored on one or more non-transitory computer storage devices (e.g., hard disk drives, solid state memory devices, etc.). Each such computer or computing device typically includes a hardware processor and a memory. Where the surgical driver 100 includes multiple computing devices, these devices may, but need not, be co-located. In some cases the surgical driver 100 may be controlled by cloud-based or shared computing resources, which can be allocated dynamically. The processes and algorithms described herein may be implemented partially or wholly in application-specific circuitry, such as Application Specific Integrated Circuits and Programmable Gate Array devices. The results of the disclosed processes and process steps may be stored, persistently or otherwise, in any type of non-transitory computer storage such as, e.g., volatile or non-volatile storage.
In some embodiments, different attachments can be removably attached to the surgical driver 100, such as at a collet of the surgical driver 100. An example of an attachment 110 is shown in
In some embodiments, the surgical driver 100 can include a mode switch (or similar mechanism) that can allow the user to toggle between modes, such as the powered and manual modes discussed below. In some embodiments, the mode switch can change the parameters of the surgical driver 100 based on a specific type of drill bit. In some embodiments, the mode switch can allow the surgical driver 100 to recognize the presence of different adapters or attachments.
In some embodiments, the body 102 may provide a user with visual output on certain parameters of the surgical driver 100, such as, power status, mode, speed, or otherwise. Some embodiments are configured to provide trajectory orientation, such as through the use of MIMS (Medical Information Management System), MEMS (Micro-Electromechanical Systems), gyroscopic, or other technology that can cue a user about the orientation of the surgical driver. In some embodiments, the surgical driver 100 is configured to indicate (e.g., to a user) deviations from a “zeroed” orientation, such as the angular deviation from a horizontal or vertical position. In some embodiments, the body 102 can include an LED or LCD display to provide information, to the user. In some embodiments, the surgical driver 100 can connect to an outside display, such as a monitor, such as through a wireless network, to provide a visual output to the outside display. In some embodiments, haptic cues (e.g., small vibrations) can provide information to the user. In some embodiments, electromagnetic field (EMF) or Hall Effect sensors can be incorporated into embodiments of the surgical driver 100.
Various shapes of the surgical driver 100 are contemplated. For example, some embodiments are on plane, which can enhance feel. In this disclosure, the term “on plane” describes a device with a generally linear arrangement. This is in contrast to “off plane” devices, which generally have an L-shaped arrangement, such as a pistol grip. In some embodiments, the surgical driver 100 has an on plane configuration in which the tip is generally in line with the user's hand, such as the tip and the handle being generally collinear. In some variants, the surgical driver 100 has an off plane configuration, such as having a pistol grip.
An on plane configuration can have a number of advantages. For example, an on plane configuration can allow a user to apply force through the surgical driver to the screw along a linear axis, rather than, for example, through a curve or elbow. In some implementations, an on plane design reduces or eliminates a moment of force that can be associated with certain pistol grip designs, such as due to force being applied to the handle of the pistol grip device and then being transferred through the barrel of the pistol grip device. Reducing or eliminating the moment can increase control of the screw and/or decrease user fatigue (e.g., by reducing exertion needed to counteract the moment). Some embodiments with an on plane configuration can avoid or reduce slippage of the drill bit 200 relative to the substrate, or at least increase the chance that such slippage will occur generally in a desired direction. For example, the on plane arrangement can locate the fingers closer to the drill bit than a pistol grip design, which can enable the user to better detect when slippage is occurring, or is about to occur, and to take action in response.
In some embodiments, an on plane configuration allows a user to use larger muscles (e.g., muscles of the upper arm) compared to pistol grip devices (e.g., which may require usage of wrist muscles or other smaller muscles). The engagement of the larger muscles can provide greater strength and/or control. In some embodiments, there may be no cantilever or no pistol grip.
The on plane arrangement can provide an improved weight distribution, such as by removing weight from a cantilever from the handle. In some arrangements, an on plane configuration can enhance the sensitivity with which a user can discern characteristics of the drill bit and/or the substrate. For example, while large muscles can control the initial driving, the fingers, located closer to the tip than if an off plane arrangement, can be used for final manipulations. Thus, the user can use their fingers for fine-tuning, which can provide more dexterity when handling the surgical driver. Further, the on plane arrangement can dampen vibrations as the surgical driver is being held by the larger arm muscles. Moreover, by stabilizing with the large arm muscles and using the wrists/fingers to manipulate, there can be less migration of the surgical driver, especially caused by unwanted jolts, as compared to an off plane arrangement, which uses a larger moment arm and thus is more susceptible to jerks/movements.
In some embodiments, the sleek form factor of the device can reduce packaging sizes, thus resulting in cost savings. Certain embodiments can ease the transition from manual surgical drivers to powered surgical drivers, can increase visibility of the tip and tissues into which the driving is occurring, and/or can reduce weight of the surgical driver which can mitigate user fatigue.
In some embodiments, the surgical driver 100 can be partially or fully cannulated and/or configured to be cannulated. This can allow the threading of a guidewire and/or k-wire (or other wire, the type of which is not limiting) through the surgical driver 100. Further, the cannulation can allow for suction to be used in conjunction with the surgical driver 100. The cannula can extend through the entirety of the surgical driver 100 (e.g., from back to front), or can include an aperture on a side of the body 102 that can lead to a tip (or near a tip) of the surgical driver 100. The cannula can general extend along (or be parallel with) a longitudinal axis of the surgical driver 100.
Further, in some embodiments, the motor 12 itself within the surgical driver 100 can be cannulated as well. Thus, a cannula can extend through at least a portion of the motor of the surgical driver 100. The motor 12 can be partially or fully cannulated and/or configured to be cannulated. The cannula can extend through the entirety of the motor 12 (e.g., from back to front), or can include an aperture on a side of the body 102 that can lead to a tip (or near a tip) of the surgical driver 100. In some embodiments, the cannula can generally extend along (or be parallel with) a longitudinal axis of the motor in the surgical driver 100. The cannulated motor can be used for a number of different applications including, for example, using a cannulated motor in a powered surgical device, using a cannulated motor in an on-plane powered surgical device, using a cannulated motor in an on-plane powered surgical device for clavicle applications, using a cannulated motor in an on-plane powered surgical device for spinal applications, using a cannulated motor in an on-plane powered surgical device for extremities, and/or using a cannulated motor in an on-plane powered surgical device for large bone applications. However, the cannulated motor can be used for other procedures as well, and the particular procedure is not limiting.
In some embodiments, the body 102 can include different shaped handles (or grips). The different handles can be used to replace a portion of the body 102, and thus can be integrally formed with the body 102 in some embodiments. In some embodiments, different handles can be detachable from a proximal end of the body 102, thus allowing a user to choose which particular handle suits the needs of a particular use (e.g., surgery). In some embodiments, the handles can be switched out during surgery by the surgeon. For example, the handles can have an attachment mechanism to the body 102, such as through male/female threading, snaps, fasteners, or other non-limiting removable attachment devices.
The handles can be made from a number of different materials, such as metal, plastic, or rubber, and can come in a variety of different shapes. Handles can further include gripping features such as bumps or divots that make it easier for a user to control the handle.
Various embodiments of the surgical driver 100 have a variety of operational characteristics. For example, some embodiments provide a maximum rotational speed (at no load) of at least about: 3,000 rpm, 4,000 rpm, 5,000 rpm, 6,000 rpm, 10,000 rpm, values between the aforementioned values, or other values. Some embodiments can slow the rotation of the drill bit 200 after a slowdown point has been reached. Certain such embodiments have a slowed speed (at no load) of less than or equal to about: 500 rpm, 600 rpm, 700 rpm, 800 rpm, 900 rpm, 1,000 rpm, 1,100 rpm, 1,200 rpm, values between the aforementioned values, or other values. Certain implementations of the surgical driver 100 can provide a torque on the drill bit 200 of at least about: 25 in-oz, 30 in-oz, 35 in-oz, 40 in-oz, 45 in-oz, values between the aforementioned values, or other values. Some embodiments of the surgical driver 100 can provide a torque on the drill bit 200 of at least: 25 N-cm, 30 N-cm, 35 N-cm, 40 N-cm, 45 N-cm, values between the aforementioned values, or other values.
Various embodiments of the surgical driver 100 include a forward input that a user can engage to instruct the surgical driver 100 to turn the drill bit 200 in a forward direction, such as in the direction to drill the drill bit 200 into the bone. For example, the forward input can be a switch, button, dial, trigger, slider, touchpad, or the like. Certain embodiments have multiple input members, such as a fast forward switch (e.g., the motor will spin at about 4100 RPM at no-load) and a slow forward switch (e.g., motor will spin at 500 RPM at no-load). Some implementations have a reversing input, which can instruct the surgical driver 100 to turn the drill bit 200 in a reverse direction, such as in the direction to remove the drill bit 200 from the bone. The reversing input can be similar to the forward input, such as the options described above. In some embodiments, engaging the reversing input causes the motor to spin at about 500 RPM at no-load. In certain implementations, the final rotational speed of the drill bit 200 is about 500 RPM. In some embodiments, the forward input and the override input are the same component. In some implementations, the surgical driver 100 can includes an input device 106, such as buttons, switches, or otherwise, that can allow a user to select a mode of operation. For example, the user can choose between a mode in which the driver stops drilling before breach (e.g., before the drill bit exits out the opposite side of the bone) occurs and a mode in which driver stops drilling after breach occurs.
In various embodiments, the surgical driver 100 includes components configured to adjust the torque data, such as by filtering the torque data, decreasing noise in a signal from a sensor 18 (e.g., a motor current sensor), or otherwise. For example, the surgical driver 100 can include one or more low-pass filters. The filters can be implemented in hardware and/or software. For example, in some embodiments, the filters comprise resistance capacitor circuitry. Certain embodiments include a software filter configured to filter out certain frequencies and/or levels of torque data. In various embodiments, the filtering components can facilitate a smoother torque curve. In some variants, the filtering components can reduce errors in the torque-limiting functionality that may otherwise be caused by noise and/or outlier measurements. In some embodiments, conversion of current, voltage, power, etc. to torque values (such as nm, inch ounces, etc.) can be performed with a look up table or a mathematical equation.
In some embodiments, the surgical driver can incorporate additional features that can identify and/or differentiate the starting torque for an already seated screw from that of a screw that has just started, such as through a higher initial torque value, which can inhibit or prevent the device from continuing to drive and potentially strip an already seated screw. Further disclosure regarding torque-limiting surgical devices (such as regarding dynamically determining and/or limiting torque when attempting to secure a plate against a bone with a screw in order to inhibit or prevent the screw from stripping or damaging the bone of a patient) can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 10,383,674 filed on Jun. 6, 2017, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Any of the features described in the '674 patent can be incorporated in the systems, devices, and methods disclosed herein.
Substrate Identification and/or Differentiation Overview
In some embodiments, data inputs (e.g., measurements performed during a portion or throughout a drill bit drilling procedure) can be used by a surgical driver 100 to make certain determinations. For example, the surgical driver 100 can be configured to use the data inputs to distinguish between and/or identify different types of tissues that the drill is being driven into. This can be called “tissue differentiation.”
The data inputs can come from, for example, motor current and/or speed, though other methods of torque measurement can be used as well. In some embodiments, the data inputs comprise a measured torque, which can be data that is derived from or indicative of the torque being supplied by the surgical driver 100. In some implementations, the data inputs comprise current and/or voltage measurements, and one or more algorithms or data tables can be used to convert the inputs into torque values.
As discussed in more detail below, in some embodiments, the surgical driver 100 can use the data inputs, and/or changes in the data inputs, to determine a particular tissue type that the surgical driver 100 is driving the drill bit 200 into. For example, the surgical driver 100 can be configured to discern whether the drill bit 200 is being driven into soft tissue or bone based on the data inputs and/or changes in the data inputs. Further, the surgical driver 100 can be configured to discern between different soft tissues or different bone types or portions of bone (e.g., cortical and cancellous) based on the data inputs and/or changes in the data inputs.
In some embodiments, the data inputs and/or the determinations can be used to adjust operation of the surgical driver 100. For example, an algorithm (e.g., a discrete torque analysis algorithm) can use the data inputs to manage the drill bit velocity of the surgical driver 100. The algorithm can be used to adjust other characteristics/functionalities of the surgical driver 100, such as voltage, current, rotational speed of the drill bit, and/or power supplied to the motor. In some embodiments, the measured torque and/or changes in the measured torque can be used to control driving of the drill bit 200, such as stopping operation of the motor, changing the driving velocity of the drill bit 200, or other changes.
In some embodiments, the changes in torque can be presented (e.g., shown or displayed) to a user. For example, embodiments of the surgical driver 100 can include one or more indicators, such as lights or sounds, which indicate the drill bit 200 is being driven in a particular torque range and/or that the drill bit 200 is being driven in a particular tissue layer or type. For example, a first indicator can activate when the drill bit 200 is being driven into a first tissue type and/or layer, and a second indicator can activate when the drill bit 200 is being driven into a second tissue type and/or layer. The surgical driver 100 can include a display (e.g., an electronic screen) that displays certain information, such as the torque being applied to the drill bit, the type of tissue the drill bit is being driven into, or otherwise. The display can be located directly on the surgical driver 100, or can be through another connected visual device, such as a TV screen or monitor in which the surgical driver 100 is connected to, for example wirelessly or wired.
As discussed in detail below, the torque and/or changes in torque can be measured in a number of different ways. For example, torque measurements can be taken during some or all (and consistently or inconsistently) of the drill bit drilling procedure. In some implementations, variations between consecutive measurements can be provided to the user. In some embodiments, an alert is provided to the user when the measured torque is outside of a certain range or beyond a threshold. This threshold may be created, for example, by a user inputting a particular torque profile into the surgical driver 100 for a particular procedure. For example, the torque profile could be for the drilling of a drill bit 200 into a clavicle bone and could include pre-programmed thresholds for that particular procedure. Further, changes in the torque or other aspects of the torque, such as the first or second derivatives of torque measurements, may be provided to the user.
The surgical driver 100 can use tissue differentiation in a variety of applications and environments. For example, the surgical driver 100 can be configured to distinguish and/or identify different tissue types during a clavicle orthopedic surgery. However, other types of surgeries or procedures are possible.
Further disclosure regarding certain features related to torque-limiting surgical drivers can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 9,265,551, filed on Jul. 16, 2014 and U.S. Pat. No. 10,383,674, filed on Jun. 6, 2017, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. Any of the features (for example, certain torque-limiting features) disclosed in the '551 Patent and/or the '674 Patent can be used in conjunction with the surgical drivers disclosed herein.
The torque used to drill a drill bit through a given bone can vary significantly. One factor that affects the amount of torque required to drill the drill bit through a bone is the density of the bone, which can change based on the patient's age, gender, disease, and other factors. Typically, the denser the bone, the greater the force required to drill the drill bit. Additionally, density can change depending on the location of bone within the body.
Several torque-limiting methods, algorithms, and components are described below. Any method, algorithm, or component disclosed anywhere in this specification can be used in conjunction with any other method, algorithm, or component disclosed anywhere in this specification, or can be used separately.
“Anti-Plunge” Torque-Limiting Applications
As discussed above, in certain surgical procedures, medical professionals (for example, surgeons) utilize hand-powered instruments to drill into a bone of a patient. However, after drilling through an entry side of the bone (e.g., a first cortical portion of a bone), it can be difficult to determine when to stop the motor so as to inhibit or prevent “plunging” of the drill bit into tissue proximate an exit side of the bone, which can cause significant damage to the tissue. Embodiments of the surgical driver described herein can be configured to limit or stop operation of the motor and/or rotation of the drill bit when the surgical driver detects that the drill bit has breached or is close to breaching a bone. For example, embodiments of the surgical driver described herein can limit or stop operation of the motor and/or rotation of the drill bit: (1) when the surgical drill detects that the drill bit is drilling at or through a location close to an exit point or region of the bone; and/or (2) when the surgical drill detects that the drill bit breaches (exits), or has breached, the bone. With respect to “(1)” (also referred to herein as a “pre-breach” stage), some embodiments of the surgical driver described herein can limit or stop operation of the motor and/or rotation of the drill bit: (a) when the surgical drill detects that the drill bit has transitioned from a softer portion of bone (e.g., cancellous portion) to a harder portion of bone (e.g., cortical); and/or (b) when the surgical drill detects that the drill bit is currently located (and/or drilling) within a second layer of a harder portion of bone (e.g., cortical) and is thus close to an exit side of the bone. With respect to “(2)” (also referred to herein as a “post-breach” stage), some embodiments of the surgical driver described herein can limit or stop operation of the motor and/or rotation of the drill bit when the surgical drill detects that the drill bit breaches (exits), or has breached, the bone.
Surgical driver 100 can utilize various methods and/or algorithms to detect the location of the drill bit 200 within bone 202 and stop rotation of the drill bit 200 prior to breaching bone 202 and/or plunging into or through tissue proximate the breaching point of bone 202. Surgical driver 100 can measure torque values at various sequential times in order to monitor and/or detect the position of drill bit 200 within bone 202. For example, in certain embodiments, a measured amount of torque (or current drawn by the motor, or other methods of determining rotation/torque discussed herein) is sampled at a sampling rate, such as about every: 2 milliseconds (ms), 5 ms, 10 ms, 20 ms, 30 ms, or any value therebetween, or any range bounded by any combination of these values, although other values outside these ranges are possible. The torque and time data can be stored in memory 24 of the surgical driver 100. This can facilitate monitoring the change in the torque relative to time (e.g., a first derivative of the torque) and/or monitoring torque at discrete intervals defined by the sampling time (for example, every 10 ms). As noted above, the torque can be directly proportional to the motor power required to drill the drill bit 200. In several embodiments, the torque at a given time is determined by the controller 20, which receives a signal from the sensor 18 indicative of the current drawn by the motor 12.
Overview of Exemplary Torque-Limiting Procedures
The method 201 can begin after the driver 100 is on (e.g., energized). At block 210, the surgical driver 100 determines whether the motor 12 is on. Motor 12 can be turned on in response to a user activating an input (e.g., a button or switch) and the controller 20 instructing that power be supplied to the motor 12. The power can be used to begin turning the drill bit 200 received within and/or secured to the drive head 104. As shown in
As shown in block 214, the surgical driver 100 can (e.g., via controller 20 and/or processor 22) compare each collected and/or stored torque value to a first threshold TThresh1. This can be used to determine whether the drill bit 200 is engaging and/or drilling through bone 202, as opposed to merely rotating in air (e.g., free-spinning). The torque values detected when drill bit 200 is free-spinning through air are generally significantly lower than torque values detected when drill bit 200 is engaging and/or drilling through bone 202. In some implementations, the first threshold TThresh1 can be 0.035 in-oz, 0.036 in-oz, 0.037 in-oz, 0.038 in-oz, or 0.039 in-oz, or any range bounded by any combination of these values, or any value within a range bounded by any of these values, although other values are possible. As shown in block 216, if a given torque value is greater than or equal to the first threshold TThresh1, the controller 20 can collect/store each of such occurrence as a “count,” the benefits of which are described further below. In some cases, the number of occurrences/times that measured torque values are greater than or equal to the first threshold TThresh1 can provide an indication of the thickness of the bone 202.
In some embodiments, the controller 20 tracks the torque data that meets certain requirements. For example, in the embodiment illustrated in
In various implementations, the controller 20 can use the torque data to deduce a location of the drill bit 200. For example, at block 220, the controller 20 can run a drill bit location analysis to determine the location of the drill bit 200 with respect to bone 202, as will be described further below. In some implementations, the controller 20 can run the drill bit location analysis regardless of whether a given torque value is greater than or equal to first threshold TThresh1 at block 214. Thus, blocks 214, 216, and/or 218 are not requirements for the operation of block 220. As discussed in more detail below, after the drill bit location analysis is conducted at block 220, the surgical driver 100 can be configured to determine whether to change an operating characteristic of motor 12. For example, the surgical driver 100 can be configured to determine whether to reduce or stop rotation of the drill bit 200 (via motor 12 and/or drive head 104) in response to a determination resulting from the analysis conducted at block 220 and to implement such a change. Such drill bit location analysis can include determining whether measured torque value(s) satisfy a criteria that indicates that the drill bit 200 has breach a bone or that is indicative that the drill bit 200 is close to breaching the bone. As shown in
Drill Bit Location/Torque Criteria Analysis
After block 222 is completed, controller 20 carries out blocks 224 and 226, each of which will be described in more detail below. At a high level, blocks 224 and 226 can determine the location of drill bit 200 within bone 202. More specifically, block 224 can determine whether the drill bit 200 is drilling, or has drilled, through or in the first cortical portion of bone 202. For example, with reference to
As will be discussed in more detail below, determining the location of drill bit 200 with respect to the second cortical portion of bone 202 can involve determining, with the surgical driver 100 whether the drill bit 200 is in a “pre-breach” stage (e.g., close to breaching the bone) or whether the drill bit 200 is in a “post breach” stage (e.g., has breached the bone). Surgical driver 100 can determine that the drill bit 200 is in a pre-breach stage by determining whether the drill bit 200 is drilling at or through a location close to an exit point or region of the bone 202 (such as exit point D in
Drill Bit Location with Respect to First Cortical Portion of Bone
At block 224a, the second group of torque samples or a portion thereof (for example, torque samples 5-9) can be analyzed and/or compared to determine whether a difference between consecutive torque values within this second group is greater than or equal to a second threshold TThresh2. For example, controller 20 can determine whether a difference between a 7th and a 6th torque value (numbered consecutively with respect to the first group of torque values) within the second group is greater than or equal to the second threshold TThresh2 and/or whether a difference between a 6th and a 5th torque value (numbered consecutively with respect to the first group of torque values) within the second group is greater than or equal to the second threshold TThresh2. If one or both of such differences is greater than or equal to the second threshold TThresh2, then block 224a is affirmative. An affirmative block 224a can be indicative that the drill bit 200 is drilling through a hard portion of the bone 202, such as the first cortical portion of bone 202 at or between points A and B as shown in
In some embodiments, the controller 20 can determine that the first cortical portion (e.g., between points A and B in
The second threshold TThresh2 can be 0.00195 in-oz, 0.00196 in-oz, 0.00197 in-oz, 0.00198 in-oz, 0.00199 in-oz, 0.002 in-oz, 0.00201 in-oz, 0.00202 in-oz, 0.00203 in-oz, 0.00204 in-oz, or 0.00205 in-oz, or any range bounded by any combination of these values, or any value within a range bounded by any of these values, although other values are possible.
At block 224b, the second group of torque samples (e.g., torque samples 5-9) or a portion thereof can be analyzed and/or compared to determine whether a difference between non-consecutive torque values within this second group is greater than or equal to a third threshold TThresh3. For example, one or more non-consecutive torque samples within the second group that are separated by one intermediate torque sample can be compared to determine whether a difference therebetween is greater than or equal to the third threshold TThresh3. For example, controller 20 can determine whether a difference between a 9th and a 7th torque value is greater than or equal to the third threshold TThresh3 and/or whether a difference between a 7th and a 5th torque value is greater than or equal to the third threshold TThresh3. If one or both of such differences is greater than or equal to the third threshold TThresh3, this can be indicative that the drill bit 200 is drilling through the hard portion of the bone 202, such as the first cortical portion of bone 202 at or between points A and B as shown in
If a difference between non-consecutive torque values (e.g., 2 values separated by one intermediate value) within this second group is not greater than or equal to the third threshold TThresh3, this can indicate either: (a) that the drill bit 200 has not engaged bone 202 (e.g., is free-spinning); or (b) that the drill bit 200 has already drilled through the first cortical portion of bone 202 (e.g., through point B of
In some embodiments, the third threshold TThresh3 can be greater than the second threshold TThresh2. The third threshold TThresh3 can be 0.00215 in-oz, 0.00216 in-oz, 0.00217 in-oz, 0.00218 in-oz, 0.00219 in-oz, 0.0022 in-oz, 0.00221 in-oz, 0.00222 in-oz, 0.00223 in-oz, 0.00224 in-oz, or 0.00225 in-oz, or any value within a range bounded by any of these values, although other values are possible.
As discussed above, the controller 20 can move to block 226 after determining a “Yes” result from block 224a or 224b, or can wait to move to block 226 until all the torque values in the second group have been analyzed according to blocks 224a and 224b (e.g., via a determination at block 224h). As discussed above, at block 226, additional analysis can be carried out to determine where the tip of the drill bit 200 is with respect to the interior (e.g., cancellous) portion of bone 202 and/or the second cortical portion of bone 202 (e.g., at or between points C and D in
Blocks 224a and 224b provide two methods by which drilling of the drill bit 200 through the first cortical portion of bone 202 can be detected. Comparing differences between one or more (or one or more sets of) consecutive torque values within the second group of torque samples (as done in block 224a) can be advantageous when drilling through thinner bone cross-sections (and, for example, thinner cortical portions of such bones). Comparing one or more (or one or more sets of) non-consecutive torque values separated by an intermediate torque value within the second group (as done in block 224b) can be advantageous when drilling through thicker bones or where a surgeon angles the drill bit 200 at an angle different than perpendicular to a surface of bone 202 (for example, at angles within 15 degrees from an axis perpendicular to such bone surface). Incorporating both blocks 224a and 224b advantageously allows controller 20 of surgical driver 100 to be used for both thin and thick bones and/or to predict whether the drill bit 200 is drilling through or in the first cortical portion of bone 202 (for example, between points A and B of bone 202 as shown in
Drill Bit Location with Respect to Second Cortical Portion of Bone
As discussed above, the controller 20 can move to block 226 after block 224g or block 224e. As discussed above, at a high level, block 226 can aid in determining the location of drill bit 200 with respect to the second cortical portion of bone 202 (for example, the portion of bone 202 between points C and D in
As discussed above, the controller 20 of surgical driver 100 can collect torque values measured and/or communicated by sensor 18 at a sampling rate. As also discussed, a first group of torque samples can be discarded (see
In block 226, the third group of torque samples can be collected. The controller 20 can analyze (e.g., compare) one or more torque values within the third group of torque samples. This can aid in determining whether drill bit 200 has recently transitioned from the interior cancellous portion of the bone 202 to a second cortical portion of bone 202 and/or whether drill bit 200 is currently drilling through this second cortical portion of bone 202. Before carrying out such comparisons, as shown in
If the number of bone-engaging torque samples is greater than or equal to such threshold percentage PThresh1, the controller 20 carries out block 226c. Block 226c can facilitate determining whether the drill bit 200 has recently transitioned from the interior cancellous portion of the bone 202 to a second cortical portion of bone 202 (for example, has recently transitioned through point C in
If a difference between a consecutive pair of torque values from the third group of torque samples is greater than or equal to ΔStep, this can indicate that there has been a significant rate of change of torque values between such consecutive torque values, which in turn can indicate that drill bit 200 has recently transitioned from cancellous bone to a second cortical portion of bone 202 (for example, through point C shown in
At block 226e, controller 20 can analyze one or more torque values within the third group of samples to determine whether drill bit 200 is currently drilling through the second cortical portion of bone 202 (for example, between points C and D in
At block 226e, controller 20 compares a given (for example, current or most recent) torque value with a fifth threshold, referred to herein as “TorqueΔ” or “TΔ.” If such current (e.g., most recent) torque value is greater or equal to TΔ, this can indicate that the drill bit 200 is currently drilling through the second portion of cortical bone. TΔ can be equal to the average torque value TAvg. plus the ΔStep (both discussed previously). TΔ thus represents a high torque value relative to previously recorded (e.g., measured) torque values.
If a given (e.g., current) torque value is greater than or equal to TΔ, controller 20 can move to block 226f to conduct an additional test as to whether the given torque value is close to the maximum torque value recorded (e.g., measured) so far, TMax. More specifically, at block 226f, controller 20 can determine a difference between a current (e.g., recent) torque value and TMax, and further determine whether such difference is greater than or equal to a sixth threshold TThresh6. In some embodiments, controller 20 determines whether an absolute value of the difference between a current torque value and TMax is greater than or equal to the sixth threshold TThresh6. The sixth threshold TThresh6 can be 0.00295 in-oz, 0.00296 in-oz, 0.00297 in-oz, 0.00298 in-oz, 0.00299 in-oz, 0.003 in-oz, 0.00301 in-oz, 0.00302 in-oz, 0.00303 in-oz, 0.00304 in-oz, or 0.00305 in-oz, or any range bounded by any combination of these values, or any value within a range bounded by any of these values, although other values are possible.
If controller 20 determines that a difference (or absolute value of a difference) between a current torque value and TMax is greater than or equal to the sixth threshold TThresh6, controller 20 moves to block 226d, which is discussed further below. Alternatively, if controller 20 determines that such difference (or absolute value of a difference) is less than the sixth threshold TThresh6, controller 20 moves to block 226g.
At block 226g, controller 20 can check whether an event was recorded according to block 224c (indicating that the drill bit 200 was drilling through the first cortical portion) and/or can check the results of the determination made at block 224d (whether the drill bit 200 actually drilled through the first cortical portion of bone). If the controller 20 previously determined that drill bit 200 drilled in or through the first cortical portion of bone 202, controller 20 can move from block 226g to block 226d, which is described further below. Block 226g can be advantageous because, even if controller 20 determines at block 226f that a current (e.g., recent) torque value is not close enough (e.g., within the sixth threshold TThresh6) to TMax, so long as the controller 20 recognizes that the first cortical portion has already been drilled in or through, the current (e.g., recent) torque value is sufficiently high (as determined by block 226e) such that it indicates that the drill bit 200 is currently drilling through the second cortical portion of bone 202. Alternatively, if controller 20 analyzes the results of block 224d and determines that the first cortical portion of bone 202 was not drilled in or through (e.g., that block 224f was determined), controller 20 can continue to collect and analyze subsequent torque values and carry out one or more of blocks 226a-226g thereafter.
In some embodiments, when results of the determinations of block 226c and/or blocks 226e-226g lead to block 226d, that can indicate that the drill bit 200 is drilling through the second cortical portion of bone 202. In response, the controller 22 can communicate with the motor 12 to stop or reduce rotation of drill bit 200. For example, at block 226c, when the controller 20 determines that drill bit 200 has recently transitioned from cancellous bone to a second cortical portion of bone 202 (for example, through point C shown in
Drill Bit Breach
With reference to block 230a, in some embodiments, for each torque value within the third group that results in a “Yes” for block 226c, block 226e and block 226f, or block 226g, controller 20 and/or processor 22 can determine a rolling average of such torque values. For example, if 5 torque samples from the third group of samples result in a “Yes” for block 226c, block 226e and block 226f, or block 226g, (representing drilling through the second cortical portion of bone 202), controller 20 and/or processor 22 can determine an average of these torque values, store such average, and update such average after each subsequent one of these 5 samples. Such average can advantageously be used as a breach threshold TBreach to determine whether the drill bit 200 has breached the bone 202. Controller 20 can carry out block 226 and block 230a for each of the third group of torque samples until all of the torque samples within the third group are measured. The precise number of torque values within the third group can be modified and can be dependent upon the sampling rate. For example, the third group of samples can include 15 torque samples, each measured at 10 ms intervals.
Some embodiments include collecting a fourth group of torque samples. In certain variants, after all of the torque samples in the third group have been analyzed according to block 226 and block 230a, controller 20 can measure and carry out analysis on a fourth group of torque samples at block 230b. As shown in
In some cases, none of the torque samples in the third group registered that the drill bit 200 was drilling in/through the second cortical portion of bone 202. In such cases, with reference to
In some embodiments, controller 20 does not carry out block 230a. In such embodiments, controller 20 can analyze whether torque values are decreasing, and immediately upon making such determination, can move to block 240 to reduce or stop rotation of drill bit 200. For example, at block 230b, controller 20 can compare a current (e.g., recent) torque value with one or more past torque values and determine, at block 230c, whether the current (e.g., recent) torque value is less than such one or more past torque values. If the current (e.g., recent) torque value is less than such one or more past torque values, controller 20 can, as shown by block 230c, move to block 240. Alternatively, if a current (e.g., recent) torque value is not less than such one or more past torque values, surgical driver 100 can continue drilling of drill bit 200 and controller 20 can continue to collect and analyze torque values according to block 230b (see block 230e).
With reference to block 230c, if controller 20 determines that torque values are decreasing or that torque values are dropping below a threshold (e.g., TBreach), this can indicate that drill bit 200 has breached bone 202. As discussed previously, such determination, and subsequent action taken according to block 240, can advantageously inhibit or prevent drilling through tissue adjacent or proximate to bone 202.
While the various steps and methods discussed above utilize the phrases “first group,” “second group,” “third group,” and “fourth group,” such phrases are not intended to be limiting. Such phrases are merely used to illustrate that one or more of the above-described blocks, steps, or processes measure and/or analyze one or more torque values to make various determinations that can advantageously help the controller 20 determine where drill bit 200 is with respect to the cross-section of bone 202. For example, use of the phrase “first group of torque samples/values” with respect to block 222 is meant to convey that a certain amount of initial torque values are discarded prior to measuring/analyzing additional torque values. Use of the phrase “second group of torque samples/values” with respect to block 224 and
The number of torque samples utilized and/or required in order to carry out the method/algorithm of
While
Certain Terminology
Conditional language used herein, such as, “can,” “could,” “might,” “may,” “e.g.,” and the like, unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without author input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Conjunctive language, such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, and Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is otherwise understood with the context as used in general to convey that an item, term, etc. may be either X, Y, or Z. Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain embodiments require at least one of X, at least one of Y, and at least one of Z to each be present.
The terms “comprising,” “including,” “having,” and the like are synonymous and are used inclusively, in an open-ended fashion, and do not exclude additional elements, features, acts, operations and so forth. Also, the term “or” is used in its inclusive sense (and not in its exclusive sense) so that when used, for example, to connect a list of elements, the term “or” means one, some, or all of the elements in the list. The term “and/or” means that “and” applies to some embodiments and “or” applies to some embodiments. Thus, A, B, and/or C is equivalent to A, B, and C written in one sentence and A, B, or C written in another sentence. The term “and/or” is used to avoid unnecessary redundancy.
The terms “approximately,” “about,” and “substantially” as used herein represent an amount close to the stated amount that still performs a desired function or achieves a desired result. For example, in some embodiments, as the context may dictate, the terms “approximately”, “about”, and “substantially” may refer to an amount that is within less than or equal to 10% of the stated amount. The term “generally” as used herein represents a value, amount, or characteristic that predominantly includes or tends toward a particular value, amount, or characteristic. As an example, in certain embodiments, as the context may dictate, the term “generally parallel” can refer to something that departs from exactly parallel by less than or equal to 20 degrees.
Terms relating to circular shapes as used herein, such as diameter or radius, should be understood not to require perfect circular structures, but rather should be applied to any suitable structure with a cross-sectional region that can be measured from side-to-side. Terms relating to shapes, such as “circular” or “cylindrical” or “semi-circular” or “semi-cylindrical” or any related or similar terms, are not required to conform strictly to the mathematical definitions of circles or cylinders or other structures, but can encompass structures that are reasonably close approximations. Likewise, shapes modified by the word “generally” (e.g., “generally cylindrical”) can include reasonably close approximations of the stated shape. As used herein, any discussion of the “drill bit,” such as the location of the drill bit relative to bone, can refer to the drill bit's tip (e.g., the distal-most end of the drill bit).
Some embodiments have been described in connection with the accompanying drawings. The figures are drawn to scale, but such scale should not be interpreted as limiting, since dimensions and proportions other than what are shown are contemplated and are within the scope of this disclosure. Distances, angles, etc. are merely illustrative and do not necessarily bear an exact relationship to actual dimensions and layout of the devices illustrated. Components can be added, removed, and/or rearranged. Further, the disclosure herein of any particular feature, aspect, method, property, characteristic, quality, attribute, element, or the like in connection with various embodiments can be used in all other embodiments set forth herein. Additionally, it will be recognized that any methods described herein may be practiced using any device suitable for performing the recited steps.
Various surgical driver devices, systems, and methods have been disclosed in the context of aspects of certain embodiments, examples, and variations. The present disclosure extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments, examples, and variations to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention, as well as obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In addition, while a number of variations of the surgical driver have been shown and described in detail, other modifications, which are within the scope of this disclosure, will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art based upon this disclosure. Moreover, while certain examples have been discussed in the context of surgical drivers, the various inventions disclosed herein are not limited to use in surgical drivers. Indeed, the various inventions disclosed herein are contemplated for in use a variety of other types of devices and other environments.
Certain features have been described in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the combination may be claimed as any subcombination or variation of any subcombination.
Any portion of any of the steps, processes, structures, and/or devices disclosed or illustrated in one embodiment, flowchart, or example in this disclosure can be combined or used with (or instead of) any other portion of any of the steps, processes, structures, and/or devices disclosed or illustrated in a different embodiment, flowchart, or example. The embodiments and examples described herein are not intended to be discrete and separate from each other. Combinations, variations, and other implementations of the disclosed features are within the scope of this disclosure.
Any of the steps and blocks can be adjusted or modified. Other or additional steps can be used. None of the steps or blocks described herein is essential or indispensable. Moreover, while operations may be depicted in the drawings or described in the specification in a particular order, such operations need not be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, and that all operations need not be performed, to achieve desirable results. Other operations that are not depicted or described can be incorporated in the example methods and processes. For example, one or more additional operations can be performed before, after, simultaneously, or between any of the described operations. Further, the operations may be rearranged or reordered in other implementations. Also, the separation of various system components in the implementations described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single product or packaged into multiple products.
The various features and processes described above may be used independently of one another, or may be combined in various ways. All possible combinations and subcombinations are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure. In addition, certain method, event, state, or process blocks may be omitted in some implementations. The methods and processes described herein are also not limited to any particular sequence, and the blocks or states relating thereto can be performed in other sequences that are appropriate. For example, described tasks or events may be performed in an order other than the order specifically disclosed. Multiple steps may be combined in a single block or state. The example tasks or events may be performed in serial, in parallel, or in some other manner. Tasks or events may be added to or removed from the disclosed example embodiments. The example systems and components described herein may be configured differently than described. For example, elements may be added to, removed from, or rearranged compared to the disclosed example embodiments.
In summary, various embodiments and examples of torque-limiting surgical driver systems and methods have been disclosed. Although the disclosure has been in the context of those embodiments and examples, this disclosure extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or other uses of the embodiments, as well as to certain modifications and equivalents thereof. Moreover, this disclosure expressly contemplates that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with, or substituted for, one another. Accordingly, the scope of this disclosure should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/544,512, filed Aug. 19, 2019, and titled “TORQUE-LIMITING DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS,” which claims from the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/719,874, filed Aug. 20, 2018, and titled “TORQUE-LIMITING DRILLING.” The entirety of each of the aforementioned applications is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2414882 | Longfellow | Jan 1947 | A |
2979089 | Piesker | Apr 1961 | A |
3120845 | Horner | Feb 1964 | A |
3578872 | McBurnie | May 1971 | A |
3643501 | Pauley | Feb 1972 | A |
3692910 | Laguzzi | Sep 1972 | A |
3926264 | Bardwell et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3962910 | Spyridakis et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3973434 | Smith | Aug 1976 | A |
3974685 | Walker | Aug 1976 | A |
3974883 | Sigmund | Aug 1976 | A |
3982419 | Boys | Sep 1976 | A |
4008772 | Boys | Feb 1977 | A |
4008773 | Wallace et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4013895 | Akiyoshi et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4023406 | Benz, Jr. | May 1977 | A |
4078589 | Miller | Mar 1978 | A |
4081037 | Jonsson | Mar 1978 | A |
4095325 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4102182 | Brown et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4104778 | Vliet | Aug 1978 | A |
4104780 | Sigmund | Aug 1978 | A |
4106176 | Rice et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4110829 | Boys | Aug 1978 | A |
4163310 | Sigmund | Aug 1979 | A |
4179786 | Eshghy | Dec 1979 | A |
4233721 | Eshghy | Nov 1980 | A |
4244213 | Marcinkiewicz | Jan 1981 | A |
4249117 | Leukhardt et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4267914 | Saar | May 1981 | A |
4273198 | Doniwa | Jun 1981 | A |
4292571 | Cuneo | Sep 1981 | A |
4344216 | Finkelston | Aug 1982 | A |
4359906 | Cordey | Nov 1982 | A |
4361945 | Eshghy | Dec 1982 | A |
4375120 | Sigmund | Mar 1983 | A |
4375121 | Sigmund | Mar 1983 | A |
4375122 | Sigmund | Mar 1983 | A |
4375123 | Ney | Mar 1983 | A |
4426588 | Weilenmann | Jan 1984 | A |
RE31569 | Eshghy | May 1984 | E |
4450727 | Reinholm et al. | May 1984 | A |
4562389 | Jundt et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4684922 | Minogue | Aug 1987 | A |
4705038 | Sjostrom et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4721169 | Nagasawa et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4830549 | Neumaier et al. | May 1989 | A |
4878404 | Liao | Nov 1989 | A |
4894767 | Doniwa | Jan 1990 | A |
4908926 | Takeshima et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4995877 | Ams et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5014793 | Germanton | May 1991 | A |
5038084 | Wing | Aug 1991 | A |
5061885 | Fukuhara | Oct 1991 | A |
5131130 | Eshghy | Jul 1992 | A |
5152046 | Abe | Oct 1992 | A |
5154242 | Soshin et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5155421 | Hansson | Oct 1992 | A |
5160978 | Faville | Nov 1992 | A |
5207697 | Carusillo et al. | May 1993 | A |
5284217 | Eshghy | Feb 1994 | A |
RE34556 | Sjostrom et al. | Mar 1994 | E |
5315501 | Whitehouse | May 1994 | A |
5337638 | Coss | Aug 1994 | A |
5382251 | Hood et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5404643 | Rice | Apr 1995 | A |
5410229 | Sebastian et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5430923 | Parent et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440215 | Gilmore | Aug 1995 | A |
5496330 | Bates et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5536267 | Edwards et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5538423 | Coss et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539288 | Neijzen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543695 | Culp et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5563482 | Shaw et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584619 | Guzzella | Oct 1996 | A |
5591919 | Hathaway et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5626474 | Kukla et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5632759 | Rexroth | May 1997 | A |
5637968 | Kainec et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5689159 | Culp et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5725533 | Carlsson | Mar 1998 | A |
5731673 | Gilmore | Mar 1998 | A |
5754019 | Walz | May 1998 | A |
5810821 | Vandewalle | Sep 1998 | A |
5831404 | Ishii | Nov 1998 | A |
5868746 | Sarver et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874816 | Ishii | Feb 1999 | A |
5890405 | Becker | Apr 1999 | A |
5898112 | Dawood | Apr 1999 | A |
5904689 | Jonjic | May 1999 | A |
5927976 | Wu | Jul 1999 | A |
5980248 | Kusakabe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993454 | Longo | Nov 1999 | A |
6022352 | Vandewalle | Feb 2000 | A |
6084366 | Koselke et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6110174 | Nichter | Aug 2000 | A |
6132435 | Young | Oct 2000 | A |
6162053 | Hollander | Dec 2000 | A |
6171312 | Beaty | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179841 | Jackson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197065 | Martin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211636 | Matsubara et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6257351 | Ark et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280476 | Metzger et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
RE37358 | Del Rio et al. | Sep 2001 | E |
6329778 | Culp et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6378623 | Kawarai | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6402757 | Moore, III et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6471707 | Miller et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479958 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500208 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508841 | Martin et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516896 | Bookshar et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6536536 | Gass et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537274 | Katz | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547565 | Dawood et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569186 | Winters et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6607385 | Sevcik et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616446 | Schmid | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629778 | Enderle et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6656184 | White et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665948 | Kozin | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676665 | Foley et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6680595 | Ito | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6700341 | Schaer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712855 | Martin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723099 | Goshert | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6780175 | Sachdeva et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6916340 | Metzger et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923813 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6954682 | Makimae et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6981976 | Schoenefeld | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7062979 | Day et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7091683 | Smith et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7141073 | May et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7185562 | Raines, Jr. et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7234536 | Scholl et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235940 | Bosch et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7250055 | Vanderwalle | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7255703 | Mujwid et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7306607 | Metzger | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7331406 | Wottreng, Jr. et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335207 | Smith | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7338286 | Porter et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344376 | Beaty et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7398700 | Makimae et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400106 | DeCicco et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7431682 | Zeiler et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435085 | Gugel et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441480 | Raines, Jr. et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7481832 | Meridew et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7484959 | Porter et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7488323 | Bacastow et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507231 | Schmieding et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7604636 | Walters et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7713285 | Stone et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7722678 | Brown et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727282 | Slone et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740425 | Zeiler et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7770658 | Ito et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7823465 | Makimae et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7839112 | Wei | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849766 | Sharifi-Mehr et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850452 | Suttin et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7881806 | Horrigan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887559 | Deng et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7896923 | Blackwell et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7936140 | Wei | May 2011 | B2 |
7955334 | Steiner et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8012215 | Metzger et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025106 | Schmidt | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8028608 | Sixto, Jr. et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8035487 | Malackowski | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8038702 | Yuan et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048115 | Winslow et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057538 | Bergin et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8074334 | Tharp et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083596 | Silver et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8087935 | Beaty et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103358 | Sommer et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8136431 | Wengreen | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147498 | Schlueter et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8161613 | Schuele et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8172004 | Ho | May 2012 | B2 |
8182539 | Tyber et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8276487 | Wengreen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8286723 | Puzio et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8322456 | Pozgay et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8347768 | Witte | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8372085 | Prager et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8425521 | Cremer et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8463421 | Brett et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8485075 | Gauthier et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8523845 | Ippisch | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529567 | Garcia et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8603148 | Raven, III et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8821493 | Anderson | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8894654 | Anderson | Nov 2014 | B2 |
D719594 | Leugers | Dec 2014 | S |
D722627 | Leugers | Feb 2015 | S |
D727985 | Leugers | Apr 2015 | S |
D732364 | Rinaldis et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
9204885 | McGinley et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9265551 | Kust et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9277926 | Xu et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
D759244 | Leugers | Jun 2016 | S |
D759245 | Leugers | Jun 2016 | S |
9358016 | McGinley et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9370372 | McGinley et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9468445 | McGinley et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9468978 | Lo et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9492181 | McGinley et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9554807 | McGinley et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9554812 | Inkpen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9561544 | Walsh et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9585677 | Garcia et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9649141 | Raven, III et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
D791944 | Palazzolo et al. | Jul 2017 | S |
D793831 | Russell et al. | Aug 2017 | S |
D793832 | Russell et al. | Aug 2017 | S |
D793833 | Russell et al. | Aug 2017 | S |
D794190 | Russell et al. | Aug 2017 | S |
D794196 | Russell et al. | Aug 2017 | S |
9826984 | McGinley et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9833244 | McGinley et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9833270 | Zlotolow | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9877734 | Anderson | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10028801 | McGinley et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10111688 | Raven, III et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10117689 | Zlotolow | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10149686 | Anderson | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10206731 | Kust et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10383674 | Sexson et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
11071575 | Sexson et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11090128 | Pfotenhauer et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20020146663 | Nakanishi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030093103 | Malackowski et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030121685 | Yamamoto | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030173096 | Setton et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040024311 | Quaid, III | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050096684 | Farrow et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116673 | Carl | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131415 | Hearn | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050205274 | Bogue | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050268750 | Bruce | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060117911 | Raines, Jr. et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060234617 | Francis et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070060933 | Sankaran et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070085496 | Philipp et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070125201 | Raines et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141110 | Stone et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070179476 | Shelton et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191915 | Strother et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070256527 | Phan | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004646 | To et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016990 | Rinner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080060487 | Schell | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080133020 | Blackwell et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080153062 | Beaty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080215060 | Garcia et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221564 | Rouiller et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080286722 | Berckmans, III et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090014192 | Ito et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090260485 | Hohmann et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100034605 | Huckins et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063508 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100116519 | Gareis | May 2010 | A1 |
20100204685 | Ippisch | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222812 | Stone et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100318093 | Ippisch | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110000688 | Iwata | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110190907 | Porter et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110245833 | Anderson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110288549 | Steiner et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301611 | Garcia et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306008 | Suttin et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306009 | Suttin et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319745 | Frey | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120046665 | Kim | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120067139 | Pernestal | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120116494 | Leynov et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120184958 | Knuchel et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120255756 | Aoki | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130014368 | Woods et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025892 | Mashiko et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130098646 | Funabashi et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130105189 | Murthy et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130116519 | Wood | May 2013 | A1 |
20130118323 | Witte | May 2013 | A1 |
20130165930 | Lehmann et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130193891 | Wood et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130269961 | Lim et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130319190 | Nino et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130327552 | Lovelass et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130331895 | Garcia et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130331994 | Ng et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341058 | Roehm | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140048298 | Fuchs | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140296845 | Miller et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150025538 | Kust | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150066036 | McGinley et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150182285 | Yen et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150201918 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160128704 | McGinley et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160206328 | Lo et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160256213 | Kust et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170007289 | McGinley et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170128081 | McGinley | May 2017 | A1 |
20170143396 | McGinley et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170143440 | McGinley et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170181758 | Brotman | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170189037 | McGinley et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170296250 | McGinley et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170348037 | Sexson et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180185034 | McGinley et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190013830 | Hoglund et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190029697 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20200038085 | Sexson et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200054410 | Pfotenhauer et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20210085342 | Ayer | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210378726 | Sexson et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105491965 | Apr 2016 | CN |
2010914 | Sep 1971 | DE |
3238069 | Apr 1984 | DE |
19620782 | Dec 1996 | DE |
19845871 | Apr 1999 | DE |
0170068 | Feb 1986 | EP |
S52-46600 | Apr 1977 | JP |
S63-150167 | Jun 1988 | JP |
H06-210575 | Aug 1994 | JP |
H07-124827 | May 1995 | JP |
H07-256566 | Oct 1995 | JP |
H08-281567 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2959294 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2002-283248 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2005-066787 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-118911 | May 2005 | JP |
2005-523174 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2009-125907 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2012-200807 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2004-291143 | Dec 2016 | JP |
WO 03090974 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03101322 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004110293 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2008105057 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008128523 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2011133160 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 2012109760 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2015006296 | Jan 2015 | WO |
WO 2015009850 | Jan 2015 | WO |
WO 2017083992 | May 2017 | WO |
WO 2017139674 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2017214194 | Dec 2017 | WO |
WO 2018132835 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO 2020041211 | Feb 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Boys, J.T., “Design and Performance of an Automatic Control System for Fastener Tightening, ” Applied Mechanics Group, vol. 191, Issue 1, Jun. 1, 1977, in 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2019/047089, dated Mar. 4, 2021, 8 pages. |
Office Action from corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201980052230.3, dated Mar. 2, 2022, 14 pages. |
Extended European Search Report received in Application No. 19851881.3, dated Mar. 23, 2022, in 7 pages. |
Brockwell, P., Excerpt from Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting, 2d Ed., 2002. |
Brown, R.G., Excerpt from Smoothing, Forecasting and Prediction of Discrete Time Series, 1963. |
Gill, P.J., The Yielding of Fastenings During Tightening, The Japan Research Institute, vol. 7, No. 12., 1976. |
Hatcher, “Evaluation of the iQTM Intelligent System for Rapid Screw Insertion,” undated but believed to be publicly available at least as early as Dec. 2012 (e.g., via http://pharma-gate.net/wp content/uploads/ 2012/12/1.pdf). |
Hsu, et al., A Modular Mechatronic System for Automatic Bone Drilling, Biomedical Engineering Applications, Basis, & Communications, vol. 13, No. 4, Aug. 2001. |
https://cwisociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/MatrixRIB_CWIS-Full_Page_Ad-1.pdf, “The Perfect Combination”, retrieved May 25, 2020, 1 page. |
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20070256527, “Torque limiting device and methods”, retrieved on Feb. 9, 2021, 7 pages. |
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6132435A/en, “Torque limiting device for surgical use”, retrieved Feb. 9, 2021, 12 pages. |
https://www.hospimedica.com/surgical-techniques/articles/294743226/novel-torque-limiting-instruments-for-orthopedic-surgeons.html, “Novel Torque Limiting Instruments for Orthopedic Surgeons”, posted Nov. 5, 2012, retrieved Dec. 6, 2020, 3 pages. |
https://www.medicaldesignandoutsourcing.com/torque-fast-series-of-disposable-surgical-instruments-launched/, “Torque Fast Series of Disposable Surgical Instruments Launched”, posted Oct. 8, 2013, retrieved Dec. 7, 2020, 3 pages. |
https://www.odtmag.com/contents/view_features/2007-12-05/applying-reliability-concepts-to-torque-limit/, “Applying Reliability Concepts to Torque-Limiting Instruments”, retrieved Feb. 9, 2021, 6 pages. |
https://www.portescap.com/en/industries-supported/surgical-power-tools/powered-surgical-screwdrivers, “Miniature Motors for Powered Surgical Screwdrivers”, retrieved on Feb. 9, 2021, 3 pages. |
https://www.pro-dex.com/turnkey-solutions, Pro-Dex, retrieved May 25, 2020, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036216, dated Oct. 10, 2017, 12 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2019/047089, dated Oct. 16, 2019, in 19 pages. |
Sears/Zemansky/Young, Excerpt from “University Physics,” 1986. |
Smith, S., Excerpt from “The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing,” 2d Ed. 1999. |
Wadsworth, H., Excerpt from Handbook of Statistical Methods for Engineers and Scientists, 2d Ed., 1990. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220202521 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62719874 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16544512 | Aug 2019 | US |
Child | 17371760 | US |