This disclosure relates to a torque limiting tool, method for using the same, and set of torque limiting tools, and more particularly a tool arranged for adjusting a device to a predetermined load, and preventing further adjustment once the predetermined load is reached.
In certain instances, it is desired to limit the torque applied to certain devices due to possible destruction of the device or injury. In orthopedic devices, and medical devices as a whole, it is possible to exceed desirable tightening of various devices worn by a user, including pins, straps, cables, etc. If a device is over-tightened, this may cause injury to the user. Although a common tool, such as a screwdriver or wrench, may tighten devices, these common tools lack any safeguards to prevent over tightening.
While it is possible to create safeguards within the device itself, such actions have the tendency of overcomplicating the device and adding to material bulk of the device. As each individual wearer of a medical device has different anatomies and thresholds, it is difficult to provide a one-size fits all approach in design of a mechanism within the device to limit certain tightening thresholds.
Various ranges of force may be required for a device or treatment, and a single tool may not adequately permit limiting to lower or higher ranges. Current solutions do not account for different forces required for different applications and treatment stages, and are limited to a single tool that may be arranged to arbitrarily fail.
Known tools may be expensive and are general tools not specific to an application. It is desirable to provide a tool or set of tools specifically designed to handle an application while providing torque limiting means. Many tools may be expensive to make and since it is useful to provide a tool with a device, such as a knee brace, it is helpful to supply a tool or set of tools that are less expensive to make and may be disposable.
According to embodiments of the disclosure, a torque limiting tool is arranged for adjusting a device to a predetermined load, and preventing further adjustment once the predetermined load is reached. The tool may shear apart once the predetermined load is reached with a handle shearing away from a key part when a predetermined magnitude of rotational force applies to the tool.
In an embodiment, the torque limiting tool includes an upper portion having a handle, a lower portion including a key part, and an intermediate portion with a shearing section and connecting the upper and lower portions.
The intermediate portion may define opposed frustoconical sections tapering toward a dividing line within the shearing section. The dividing line may be along the shearing section and adapted to shear the frustoconical sections from one another upon application of a predetermined rotational force. The frustoconical sections may have the same dimensions and may be mirror opposite one another. The frustoconical sections may have substantially continuous concentric dimensions. The torque limiting tool may be monolithic and continuously formed.
The key part may define a protruding non-cylindrical shape forming an end portion of the torque limiting tool. The key part may define a polygonal cross-section, although other shapes are likewise envisioned. The upper, intermediate and lower portions may be coaxial along a longitudinal axis of the torque limiting tool. The handle may define coaxial first and second arms along a lateral axis perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the torque limiting tool. Each of the first and second arms may define an arcuate surface and a linear surface on opposed sides of each of the arms. The arcuate surface of the first arm may be on a side opposite to the arcuate surface of the second arm. The arcuate surface of each of the first and second arms extends along opposed sides of the longitudinal axis.
The arcuate surface of each of the first and second arms may define an arcuate segment generally concentric with the intermediate portion. The upper portion may define an upper cylindrical portion between the handle and the intermediate portion, and is generally concentric with the intermediate portion. The lower portion defines a lower cylindrical portion between the key part and the intermediate portion. The lower portion is generally concentric with the intermediate portion. The lower portion may define a lower cylindrical portion between the key part and the intermediate portion. The lower portion is generally concentric with the intermediate portion and defines a flanged surface extending generally perpendicularly to the key part.
In a method for securing a device with a torque limiting tool of any of the foregoing embodiments, the method includes coupling the key part with the rotatable receptacle, and rotating the torque limiting tool in a first rotational direction wherein at a predetermined level of rotational force, the shearing section separates the handle from the key part. The rotatable receptacle couples to a ratchet element preventing rotational movement in a second rotational direction opposite the first rotational direction. The method may further include selecting the torque limiting tool among a plurality of different torque limiting tools each having a shearing section indexed at a different predetermined level of rotational force.
A set of torque limiting tools may be provided wherein each of the torque limiting tools has a different shearing section indexed at a different predetermined level of rotational force required to shear the shearing section and sever the handle from the key part. Each of the torque limiting tools includes different indicia indicating the predetermined level of rotational force of an individual torque limiting tool.
The torque limiting tool, the methods for using the same, and set of torque limiting tools are described referring to the accompanying drawings which show preferred embodiments. The tool, method and set as disclosed in the accompanying drawings are illustrated for example only. The elements and combinations of elements described below and illustrated in the drawings can be arranged and organized differently to result in embodiments still within the spirit and scope of the tool, method and set described.
A better understanding of different embodiments of the torque limiting tool, the methods for using the same, and set of torque limiting tools may be gained from the following description read with the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to like elements.
While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrative embodiments are in the drawings and will be described below. It should be understood, however, there is no intention to limit the disclosure to the embodiments disclosed, but on the contrary, the invention covers all modifications, alternative constructions, combinations, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure and defined by the appended claims.
It will be understood that, unless a term is defined in this disclosure to possess a described meaning, there is no intent to limit the meaning of such term, either expressly or indirectly, beyond its plain or ordinary meaning.
Referring to the embodiment of
The shearing section 15 serves as the torque limiting aspect of the tool 10 and fails upon applying a torque over a predetermined maximum amount. The shearing section 15 fails in shear so the upper portion 12 separates from the lower portion 16. When used to tighten a device, the separation of handle 20 from the key part 18 prevents a user from tightening the device beyond the predetermined amount, with the key part 18 unable to be used any further. The tool 10 may be mass produced and used with a corresponding device regardless of the circumstances of the usage of the device because the shearing section fails at the same torque.
Because the torque limiting tool is not a fastener by itself, but a tool for fastening or applying torque to a device, the key part may be configured to accommodate any mass produced receptacle. The key part can be adapted according to the receptacle, and therefore has universal application.
The frustoconical sections 34, 36 have the same dimensions and are preferably mirror opposite one another. Also, it is preferred that the frustoconical sections have substantially continuous concentric dimensions which provide uniform separation along the shearing section 15. As with the gradually reduction of material at the frustoconical sections, the separation at the shearing section is smooth to avoid abrupt breaking.
The torque limiting tool is not limited to using opposed frustoconical sections, and may merely include a shearing section having a reduced diameter between the upper and lower portions.
As shown in
Each of the first and second arms 22, 24 defines an arcuate surface 28 and a linear surface 26 on opposed sides of each of the arms 22, 24. The arcuate surface 28 of the first arm 22 is preferably on a side opposite to the arcuate surface 28 of the second arm 24. The arcuate surface 28 of each of the first and second arms 22, 24 extends along opposed sides of the longitudinal axis 30, and defines an arcuate segment 29 concentric with the intermediate portion 14.
The orientation of the arms of the handle provide for greater ease in tightening the key part to a receptacle, and reduces the impact of any sharp edges that may harm fingers in rotating the device. The shape of the handle is not limited to the embodiments described herein, and may be defined by a variety of shapes enabling one to grasp and turn the tool according to the manner described herein.
The lower portion 16 defines a cylindrical portion 41 between the key part 18 and the intermediate portion 14, and is concentric with the intermediate portion 14, as understood by lines 38. The cylindrical portion 41 defines a flanged surface 52 extending generally perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis 42 along which protrudes the key part 18. The flanged surface 52 is preferably substantially flat, and should extend flush with a surface of a device with which the torque limiting tool engages.
The key part 18 defines a protruding non-cylindrical shape forming an end portion of the torque limiting tool, and the shape is preferably of a polygon such as a square, hexagonal, diamond, Phillips head, etc. As shown in
An example of a key part 120 with a diamond profile 122 is found in
The torque limiting tool is preferably monolithic and continuously formed. The torque limiting tool is formed from plastic as a solid, single body and therefore mass produced. In this manner, it is readily acceptable and cost-effective to provide a user with an abundance of torque limiting tools for each application of the device to limit effects from excessive torque. A variety of torque limiting tools may be provided each having a different threshold for separation.
As an alternative, the torque limiting tool may be reinforced with additional elements. The handle may be reinforced with a lateral bar, or the key part may be attached to the lower cylindrical portion whereby the key part is formed from a different material such as a different plastic comprising the remainder of the torque limiting tool, or a metal part.
In an example of operation,
The device part 47 is arranged as a shell that is incrementally drawn toward a tibia of a user by regulation of a cable 48 coupling to a frame of the orthopedic device (not shown). The device part 47 includes a tightening mechanism defining opening 46 through which the lower portion 16 of the torque limiting tool 10 extends to engage a receptacle 50. The receptacle 50 has a cavity dimensioned and configured to couple with the key part 18 to permit coupling in a rotational direction forming internal surfaces of the same size and shape as the key part. The tightening mechanism defines a surface 54 upon which the flanged surface 52 engages and prevents further movement of the key part into the receptacle 50.
The tightening mechanism is arranged to incrementally rotate in a first direction A and resists rotation in a second direction B unless released by release means described in Ser. No. 61/838,217. Upon excessive tightening in the first direction A, the shearing section 15 breaks and the handle and the key lock separate from one another.
The torque limiting tool is not limited to be being used in medical devices, but can be used in a variety of applications requiring limitations on torque.
Each tool has a different shearing section 108, 110, 112 defined by a different geometry. The different geometry may be defined by a shearing section with a greater diameter, thickness or other suitable means to enable a failure at a different torque.
To assist the user distinguish among the torque limiting tools, each tool may be colored differently. For example in the set 100, the first tool 102 is colored black, the second tool 104 is colored gray, and the third tool 106 is colored white. The tool set is not limited to the specified colors, and may be provided with any color scheme that distinguishes one tool from the other.
Whether provided alone or in combination with a color scheme, each tool may include indicia to denote the torque limits of each tool. The first tool 102 has indicia 114 defined by a single dot. The first tool preferably has a lower torque or load limit and the device incurs a variable load over a range of motion. Once a load is achieved, the shearing section will fail once it reaches the lower limit threshold. The second tool 104 has indicia 116 defined by two dots and preferably has a middle torque limit. The third tool 106 has indicia 118 defined by three dots and preferably has a higher torque limit. Various other indicia may denote the torque limit of each tool.
It should be understood that not necessarily all objects or advantages may be achieved under any embodiment of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out to achieve or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught without achieving other objects or advantages as taught or suggested.
Those skilled in the art will recognize the interchangeability of various disclosed features. Besides the variations described, other known equivalents for each feature can be mixed and matched by one of ordinary skill under principles of the present invention.
Although this invention has been disclosed in certain exemplary embodiments and variations, it therefore will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents. It is intended that the present invention disclosed should not be limited by the disclosed embodiments described above.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2195024 | Bullock | Mar 1940 | A |
2536454 | Mcintyre | Jan 1951 | A |
2959168 | Shook | Nov 1960 | A |
3331267 | Tietge | Jul 1967 | A |
3444560 | Northup, Jr. | May 1969 | A |
3753625 | Fabrizio et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3976057 | Barclay | Aug 1976 | A |
4064569 | Campbell | Dec 1977 | A |
4100918 | Glancy | Jul 1978 | A |
4145766 | May | Mar 1979 | A |
4215600 | Kesselman | Aug 1980 | A |
4298992 | Burstein et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4361142 | Lewis et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4370977 | Mauldin et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4372298 | Lerman | Feb 1983 | A |
4407276 | Bledsoe | Oct 1983 | A |
4433679 | Mauldin et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4463751 | Bledsoe | Aug 1984 | A |
4506661 | Foster | Mar 1985 | A |
4520802 | Mercer et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4523585 | Lamb et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4649906 | Spademan | Mar 1987 | A |
4655201 | Pirmantgen | Apr 1987 | A |
4691694 | Boyd et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697583 | Mason et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4723539 | Townsend | Feb 1988 | A |
4732143 | Kausek et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733656 | Marquette | Mar 1988 | A |
4768762 | Lund | Sep 1988 | A |
4773404 | Townsend | Sep 1988 | A |
4790299 | Marquette | Dec 1988 | A |
4793333 | Marquette | Dec 1988 | A |
4817588 | Bledsoe | Apr 1989 | A |
4838264 | Bremer et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4856500 | Spadman | Aug 1989 | A |
4856501 | Castillo et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865024 | Hensley et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4890607 | Townsend | Jan 1990 | A |
4911709 | Marlow et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4955369 | Bledsoe et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961416 | Moore et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4966133 | Kausek | Oct 1990 | A |
D313471 | Bremer et al. | Jan 1991 | S |
4982732 | Morris | Jan 1991 | A |
4991571 | Kausek | Feb 1991 | A |
5002045 | Spademan | Mar 1991 | A |
5018514 | Grood et al. | May 1991 | A |
5020797 | Burns | Jun 1991 | A |
5038765 | Young et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5052375 | Stark et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5063917 | Young et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5158458 | Perry | Oct 1992 | A |
5176622 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5213094 | Bonutti | May 1993 | A |
5230696 | Silver et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5230697 | Castillo et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5261871 | Greenfield | Nov 1993 | A |
5299474 | Hohmann | Apr 1994 | A |
5347894 | Fischer | Sep 1994 | A |
5357654 | Hsing-Chi | Oct 1994 | A |
5437611 | Stern | Aug 1995 | A |
5443444 | Pruyssers | Aug 1995 | A |
5456268 | Bonutti | Oct 1995 | A |
5472410 | Hamersly | Dec 1995 | A |
5472412 | Knoth | Dec 1995 | A |
5514082 | Smith, III | May 1996 | A |
5588956 | Billotti | Dec 1996 | A |
5599288 | Shirley et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5628722 | Solomonow et al. | May 1997 | A |
5658241 | Deharde et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662596 | Young | Sep 1997 | A |
5685830 | Bonutti | Nov 1997 | A |
5807294 | Cawley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827208 | Mason et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5857988 | Shirley | Jan 1999 | A |
5873847 | Bennett et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5891061 | Kaiser | Apr 1999 | A |
5891071 | Sterns et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5921946 | Tillinghast et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5950245 | Binduga | Sep 1999 | A |
5954677 | Albrecht et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5997493 | Young | Dec 1999 | A |
6004283 | Young | Dec 1999 | A |
6074355 | Bartlett | Jun 2000 | A |
6110137 | Bastyr et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6129690 | Hamlin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
RE37209 | Hensley et al. | Jun 2001 | E |
RE37297 | Smith, III | Jul 2001 | E |
6290664 | Nauert | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308598 | O'Neil | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331169 | Bastyr et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6409693 | Brannigan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413232 | Townsend et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425166 | Seligman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6666837 | Weihermuller | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6740054 | Sterns | May 2004 | B2 |
6752775 | Seligman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6868757 | Hufnagl | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875187 | Castillo | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6936020 | Davis | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6993808 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7004919 | Gaylord et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7037287 | Cormier et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7059329 | Mason et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074201 | Reinecke et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7097627 | Enzerink et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117569 | Bledsoe | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144252 | Walton | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7150721 | Houser | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7182740 | Castillo | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7188556 | Rinner | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7192407 | Seligman et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198610 | Ingimundarson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201728 | Sterling | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207960 | Kenney | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7235058 | Doty et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235059 | Mason et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7299725 | Helstern | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308842 | Hufnagl | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7309322 | Albrecht et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311687 | Hoffmeier et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7431708 | Sreeramagiri | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435234 | Gamada | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7485103 | Mason et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500957 | Bledsoe | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7534217 | Seligman et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7534219 | Sterns | May 2009 | B2 |
7544174 | Nathanson | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7553289 | Cadichon | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7597675 | Ingimundarson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7662122 | Sterling | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7722555 | Doty et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7757303 | Miller | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7806842 | Stevenson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811242 | Seligman | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7846115 | Seligman et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850632 | Gilmour | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7927299 | Krause | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7963933 | Nace | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8048013 | Ingimundarson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8128587 | Stevenson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
9044286 | O'Neil | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20020013544 | Stearns | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020052568 | Houser et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020133108 | Jagodzinski | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040002674 | Sterling | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040049140 | Doty et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054307 | Mason et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054311 | Sterling | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068215 | Adelson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040097859 | Sterns | May 2004 | A1 |
20050015156 | Hikichi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020951 | Gaylord et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050177082 | Bledsoe | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050273025 | Houser | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060100560 | Gilmour | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100561 | Gilmour | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116616 | Albrecht et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142680 | Iarocci | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070010772 | Ryan | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070100265 | Gamada | May 2007 | A1 |
20070232972 | Martinez | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270976 | DeHarde et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080051684 | Gamada | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080249448 | Stevenson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294079 | Sterling et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090054819 | Einarsson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090099495 | Campos et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099562 | Ingimundarson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105622 | Sterling et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124948 | Ingimundarson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090240181 | Sreeramagiri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259154 | Nace | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287128 | Ingimundarson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100010409 | Bejarano | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100056970 | Nace | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100162539 | Rancon | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110098618 | Fleming | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120046585 | Lee et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059296 | Kompa | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130172797 | Merkley et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178771 | Moir et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130331754 | Dunn et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
196 31 632 | Feb 1998 | DE |
196 45 076 | May 1998 | DE |
198 11 925 | Oct 1999 | DE |
102 59 751 | Jul 2004 | DE |
0 841 044 | May 1998 | EP |
0 941 722 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1 114 619 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1 302 184 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 575 464 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1 880 802 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2 612 624 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2 486 852 | Jan 1982 | FR |
2 663 380 | Dec 1991 | FR |
2 777 489 | Oct 1999 | FR |
2 828 093 | Feb 2003 | FR |
8604228 | Jul 1986 | WO |
9616615 | Jun 1996 | WO |
2004056293 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2006044423 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2010087899 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Defrate, Louis E., et al., “In Vivo Function of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament During Weightbearing Knee Flexion”, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Dec. 2004, pp. 1923-1928, vol. 32, No. 8, Publisher: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Published by SAGE; http://ajs.sagepub.com/content/32/8/1923. |
Cascade, “Jack PCL Brace”, Oct. 2004, Publisher: Cascade Orthopedic Supply, Inc., Published in: US. http://www.cascade-usa.com/customer/caorsu/images/PDF/SSN—jackPCL.pdf downloaded. |
Markolf, Keith L., et al., “Changes in Knee Laxity and Ligament Force After Sectioning the Posteromedial Bundle of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Oct. 2006, pp. 1100-1106, vol. 22, No. 10, Publisher: Arthroscopy Association of North America, Published in: US. |
Papannagari, Ramprasand, et al., “Function of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Bundles During In Vivo Knee Flexion”, American Journal of Sports Medicine, Sep. 2007, pp. 1507-1512, vol. 35, No. 9, Publisher: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Published by SAGE; http://ajs.sage.pub.com/content/35/9/1507. |
Bledsoe Axiom/Axiom-D Custom 7 OTS Knee Brace, “Application Instructions & Patient Manual”, Jan. 2007, pp. 1-4, vol. CP020223, Rev B, Publisher: Bledsoe Brace Systems, Published in: US. http://www.bledsoebrace.com/pdf/Al/Axiom-Al.pdf. |
Brochure: Armor Fourcepoint, Donjoy Product pages http://www.donjoy.com/armorfp. Downloaded, Oct. 2011, p. 2. Published: US. |
Brochure: “Fusion OA”, Breg 360 Customer Care, Product page http://www.breg.com/knee-bracing/oa/fusion-oa.html, downloaded, Oct. 2011, 2 pages. Publisher: Orthofix, Published in: US. |
Brochure: “Fusion XT OA”, Bregg 360 Customer Care, Product page http://www.breg.com/knee-bracing/oa/fusion-xt-oa.html, downloaded, Oct. 2011, 2 pages. Publisher: Orthofix, Published in: US. |
Brochure: “CTI Custom”, OSSUR Product page from http://www.ossur.com/?PageID=13230 downloaded, Oct. 2011, 2 pages. Publisher: Ossur Americas, Published in: US. |
Brochure: “X2K-OA”, Bregg 360 Customer Care, Product page http://www.breg.com/knee-bracing/oa/x2k-oa.html. Downloaded, Oct. 2011, 1 page. Publisher: Orthofix, Published in: US. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from International Application No. PCT/US2011/051627, Jan. 6, 2012. |
International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2012/062702, Feb. 15, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application No. PCT/US2011/051627, Mar. 28, 2013. |
Menetrey, Jacques, “PCL: Conservative Treatment”, 4th Advanced Course on Knee Surgery, Jan. 22-27, 2012. http://www.kneecourse.com/download/seminar—2012/monday/MENETREY%20Conservative%20treatment.pdf. |
Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 12150517.6, May 22, 2012. |
Smith, Sean D. et al., “Functional bracing of ACL injuries: current state and future directions”, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthhroscopy, Springer, Apr. 27, 2013, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from International Application No. PCT/US2014/013245, mailed May 6, 2014. |
Jansson, Kyle S. et al., “A Historical Perspective of PCL Bracing”, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthhroscopy, Springer-Verlag, May 24, 2012, 7 pages. |
Knapik, Joseph J. et al., “Isometric, Isotonic and Isokinetic Torque Variations in Four Muscle Groups Through a Range of Joint Motion, Physical Therapy: Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association and de Fysiotherapeut”, vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 938-947, downloaded from http://ptjournal.apta.org/ on Apr. 15, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from Corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2014/051784, Nov. 19, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150053053 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61982972 | Apr 2014 | US | |
61868659 | Aug 2013 | US |