This invention relates in general to well tools and particularly to a load shoulder located within a wellbore tubular member that is capable of transmitting torque as well as transmitting an axial load.
Load shoulders are often used in wellbores to support various tools and equipment. A load shoulders is typically a conical or flat surface that encircles a bore within a tubular member. A load shoulder, also called a “no-go” shoulder, prevents tools having diameters larger than the inner diameter of the load shoulder from passing through. The load shoulder has the capacity to support the weight of the tool or device that lands on it.
A load shoulder is employed wherein wells are drilled by a method called casing-while-drilling. In this method, rather than a string of drill pipe being employed to drill the well, the operator drills the well with a string of casing or liner, and the casing or liner is subsequently cemented in the well. The term “casing” refers to well pipe that is cemented in the well and extends all the way to the wellhead. The term “liner” refers to pipe that is cemented in the well but extends only a short distance above the lower end of a previously installed string of casing. For convenience, both casing and liner will be referred to herein as casing. In the casing-while-drilling technique, a sub or tubular member is connected into the casing string near or at the lower end of the casing string. The tubular member has a no-go shoulder located within its bore.
The operator lowers a bottom hole assembly (“BHA”) into the casing string. The BHA has a profile that will land on the no-go shoulder. A lower portion of the BHA extends through the no-go shoulder and out the lower end of the casing. A drill bit and optionally other equipment are located on this lower portion. Typically the BHA has a connector member that includes dogs that extend out and engage an annular recess in the tubular member to prevent the BHA from moving upward from the no-go shoulder when the casing string weight is imposed on the drill bit during drilling. Also, torque needs to be transmitted from the casing string to the BHA. Typically, spring-biased dogs are employed to spring out and engage circumferentially spaced-apart recesses or splines located in the bore of the tubular member. The operator employs a casing gripper at the surface to grip the casing and rotate it. The casing gripper attaches to a top drive of the drilling rig.
While this type of casing drilling is successful, the spring-biased dogs that serve to transmit torque from the casing to the BHA add some complexity to the BHA. Also, in small diameter wellbores, there may be inadequate room to mount spring biased dogs for transmitting torque.
The well apparatus of this invention includes a tubular member that locates in the wellbore and may be connected into and form part of a casing string employed for casing-while-drilling. The tubular member has a bore with a load shoulder located within it. The load shoulder has a torque transferring portion that extends upward from a lower terminus to an upward terminus. The torque transferring portion faces generally into a selected rotational direction relative to an axis of a tubular member. The load shoulder also has an axial force transferring portion that faces upward for transferring axial force.
A BHA that is lowered through the casing string has a profile that lands on the load shoulder. The profile has a torque transferring portion that mates in flush contact with the torque transferring portion of the load shoulder, so that the torque imposed on the casing string transfers to the BHA. The profile also has an axial load transferring portion that mates in flush contact with the axial load transferring portion of the load shoulder for transferring weight of the casing string to the BHA.
The load shoulder may be formed on a sleeve that is rigidly attached to the tubular member within the bore of the tubular member. In some of the embodiments, the torque transferring portion is substantially parallel with an axis of the tubular member. In other embodiments, it is inclined. The axial force transferring portion may comprise a helical surface extending 360 degrees from the lower terminus to the upper terminus of the torque transferring portion. Alternately, the load shoulder may have a sawtooth configuration with peaks and valleys defining the upper terminus and lower terminus. The flanks between the valleys and peaks comprise the torque transferring portions. The flanks may be parallel to the axis of the tubular member or they may be inclined at an angle. The axial force transferring portions are at the valleys of the load shoulder.
Preferably the BHA has a latch that mounts to the BHA and engages a recess in the tubular member when the profile lands on the load shoulder. The latch prevents upward movement of the BHA relative to the casing string.
Referring to
A sleeve 17 has a lower end that is in contact with no-go shoulder 15. Sleeve 17 has an outer diameter that is greater than the inner diameter of no-go shoulder 15. In this example, the outer diameter of sleeve 17 is substantially the same as the inner diameter of bore 13 above no-go shoulder 15. Sleeve 17 is rigidly attached to tubular member 11 so that it will transmit torque as well as resist upward and downward movement within bore 13. Sleeve 17 may be attached to tubular member 11 in various manners, and in this embodiment, a weld 19 is shown attaching the lower end of sleeve 17 to no-go shoulder 15. Alternately, sleeve 17 could have splines or keys that engage mating grooves in bore 13 or vice-versa for transmitting torque.
As shown also in
Load shoulder 21 also has an axial load transfer portion 29. The axial load transfer portion 29 in this example is a helical edge that faces and slopes upward from lower terminus 27 to upper terminus 25. The lowest point of axial load transfer portion 29 joins lower terminus 27. The uppermost point of axial load transfer portion 29 joins upper terminus 25. A helical angle relative to axis 16 is selected so as to provide a desired axial length for load transfer portion 23. The circumferential extent of axial load transfer portion 29 from lower terminus 27 to upper terminus 25 is 360 degrees about axis 16. The thickness of torque transfer portion 23 is the same as the thickness of axial load transfer portion 29, which is the wall thickness of sleeve 17. Rather than a separate sleeve 17 being installed in bore 13, load shoulder 21 could be machined directly into bore 13 of tubular member 11.
Referring again to
A profile 37 is formed on BHA 31 above drill bit 35. Profile 37 matches the contour of load shoulder 21. Profile 37 has a torque transfer portion 39 that is at the same angle relative to axis 16 as torque transfer portion 23 of load shoulder 21. Profile 37 has an axial load transfer portion 41 that comprises a helical edge sloping from the lower terminus of torque transfer portion 39 to the upper terminus of torque transfer portion 39. Axial load transfer portion 41 extends 360 degrees and has the same helical angle as load shoulder axial load transfer portion 29. The length of torque transfer portion 39 is the same as the length of torque transfer portion 23 of load shoulder 21. The outer diameter of profile 37 may be slightly less than the outer diameter of sleeve 17 in order to provide a clearance as BHA 31 is being lowered into tubular member 11. Alternately, it could have the same outer diameter as sleeve 17 if sleeve 17 were located in a smaller diameter portion of bore 13.
Referring to
In the example of
In the operation of the invention, the operator may need to trip out BHA 31 from the position of
The BHA (not shown) for the embodiment of
In the example of
The various embodiments disclose load shoulders that not only support the weight of a tool being lowered into a well bore, but also will transmit torque between the tool and the tubular member.
While the invention has been shown in only a few of its forms, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that it is not so limited but it is susceptible to various changes without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3556216 | Condra | Jan 1971 | A |
4256179 | Shillander | Mar 1981 | A |
4489781 | Weeks | Dec 1984 | A |
4496000 | Weeks | Jan 1985 | A |
4821818 | Mefferd | Apr 1989 | A |
5018582 | Baker | May 1991 | A |
5086843 | Mims et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5125148 | Krasnov | Jun 1992 | A |
5839524 | Sanford | Nov 1998 | A |
6634424 | Knowles | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7475742 | Angman et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7975771 | Ford | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20020070032 | Maguire et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20050257935 | Craig | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050287854 | Shears et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060096787 | Underwood et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20100122849 | Salzer et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 123 523 | Feb 1984 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110192614 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |