(1) Field of the Invention
One aspect of this disclosure relates to a manufacturing apparatus and process to produce a torrefied biomass or biocoal that can replace coal in coal-fired systems such as gasification, pyrolysis and combustion.
(2) Background Art
Biomass aids in meeting the targets established by the Kyoto Protocol and the Copenhagen Accord. Also, using biomass for energy production can meet the Renewable Energy Portfolios of U.S. States.
Initially, using raw-biomass seemed the most promising solution to reduce greenhouse gases. Indeed, co-firing raw-biomass in coal-fired boilers has been attempted for demonstration and commercial purposes. However, problems have been encountered, the most important of which is grindability of the raw-biomass (others are high bulk volume moisture content, low calorific value, hydrophobic material, thermal instability and production of undesired tars). Using torrefied-biomass, or simply biocoal, as a replacement of coal solves many of the problems encountered in using raw-biomass because during torrefaction, hemicelluloses, made of polysaccharides, is decomposed and changes the viscoelastic properties of the biomass and improves grindability. Furthermore, biocoal will merge into existing technologies with no added technological complications, nor large capital or operation costs.
It is expected that electricity production by coal-fired utility boilers will continue to be stable at ˜45% of total production in the next 30 years. Coal's efficiencies and energy-generation capabilities are well documented. However, it is accompanied by high levels of CO2 and other emissions. Biocoal offers many of the same benefits of coal and also: (1) significantly reduces emissions (CO2, NOx, SOx, mercury, PAH, particulates); (2) can be cost-competitive with coal. Replacing 20-25% of coal by biocoal can be achieved in 10 years. Therefore it is important to develop torrefaction processes. Torrefaction has been shown to decrease volatile matter in biomass, making biocoal safer for grinding due to a lower risk of self-ignition. Temperature and residence time were found to have a great effect on: (1) the chemical properties and durability of torrefied-biomass; (2) the behavior of oxidation biocoal; (3) syngas production in gasification; (4) increasing the hydrophobic nature of biomass. As a consequence, biocoal can be considered a premium drop-in biofuel with properties similar to coal that can be controlled to match those of a given coal.
Among the patent references considered before filing this application were:
US20080263891 A1: Process for treating lignocellulosic material, and apparatus for carrying out the same;
US20030221363: Process and apparatus for making a densified torrefied fuel;
US20090250331 A1: Auto thermal and mobile torrefaction devices;
US20090272027 A1: Method for the preparation of solid fuels by means of torrefaction as well as the solid fuels thus obtained and the use of these fuels;
US20110179700 A1: System and methods for torrefaction and processing of biomass.
One aspect of this disclosure relates to a torrefaction process and the resulting biocoal product.
Another aspect involves a process for producing a new material, referred to as torrefied-biomass or biocoal that can replace coal in coal-fired systems such as gasification, pyrolysis and combustion. Biocoal is considered a drop-in fuel to be used in existing coal fired systems without the necessity to retrofit or upgrade them.
The disclosed process and related manufacturing apparatus uses a variety of feedstock types, including woody, herbaceous and other biomass types as well as waste streams that include any organic material such as municipal solid wastes and scrap tires.
Described herein is a method and apparatus for the production of torrefied biomass (referred to herein as “biocoal”) from all carbonaceous materials, including, but not restricted to, plant biomass, carbonaceous wastes (for example municipal solid waste—MSW), synthetic carbonaceous materials (for example plastic polymers), animal manure, sewage, and other carbonaceous materials, to produce customized biocoal with properties required for a specific application, such as combustion, gasification and pyrolysis.
In several embodiments, the torrefaction process of this disclosure is automatically controlled to provide a customized biocoal, including but not restricted to volatile matter, fixed carbon content, moisture content, calorific value, level of hydrophobicity, endurance, density, and strength. The control parameters of the process include moisture content, heating rate, residence time, temperature, oxygen content, feed rate, feedstock type, and chlorine content.
One aspect of the disclosed torrefaction system involves several stages that use difference manufacturing components. Each stage has its own characteristics according to the specific properties of the material and the process control parameters, from the input feed (for example wet biomass, MSW), through drying, heating, torrefaction, grinding, compaction, cooling, and finally of the output biocoal for storage.
None of the above-listed patent references or others of which applicant is aware disclose or suggest a control system for producing customized biocoal using a multi-stage process in which each stage has different characteristics according to needs.
In an exemplary approach, the disclosed torrefaction process and manufacturing apparatus has up to six stages, some of which are optional:
Stage I: A feed process step that ensures smooth and controlled feedstock ingestion that operates automatically (feed bin #1 in
Stage II: A drying process step that operates anaerobically to avoid potential fire and give full control over the biocoal properties, occurring at about 120-150° C. (dryer #3 in
Stage III: A torrefaction process step that comprises:
Stage IV: A downsizing (grinding) step that involves reducing the biocoal particles to 30-1000 microns at high temperatures required for the compaction (mill #12 in
Stage V: A mineral matter separation step, after downsizing, that separates the mineral matter from the biocoal particles. Experimenters have observed that after grinding, most of the mineral matter is separated from the biocoal particles. Therefore separation of these two components is much easier than if the mineral matter remained within the biocoal particles. The biocoal produced after separation is a high grade, beneficiated fuel with very little risk of producing slagging in pulverized coal-fired boilers (separator #14 in
Stage VI: A compaction process (compactor #15 in
Some of the above stages release gas streams that must be pumped and treated according to the nature of the gas composition.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention. Correlation tables of reference numerals and the components which they identify appear at the end of this section of our patent application.
The first step is to shred the biomass feedstock to pieces that preferably are about 6-15 mm in size. Reduced size allows efficient heat transfer from the various reactors (downstream) and yet is affordable from the economic stand point of the cost of the biomass shredding. The inventors have tested many types of feedstock that can be used in practicing the disclosed process: carbonaceous materials such as woody biomass, agricultural wastes, forest wastes, garden residues, plastic materials, municipal solid waste (MSW) and scrap tires. Each can yield biocoal that is suitable for firing. The fact that one can use any type of carbonaceous material is a useful feature of the disclosed process—particularly the use of MSW and its potential to solve ecological and environmental problems.
What now follows is a more detailed description of the various stages of our torrefaction system.
Stage I—The Feed Bin
The feed bin (#1 in
These two issues are solved in the feed bin that is described below. The feedstock is fed into a storage tank (#1 in
The flow rate of the feedstock emanating from the feed bin is corrected according a signal related to mass flow measured downstream by changing the rotation speed of the paddle conveyor (preferably by a variable frequency motor).
To determine any bridging occurring during the feed operation, a density sensor (#4 in
A control system (#6 in
As required, the controller operates a set of gas jet devices (#5 in
Stage II—The Dryer
The dryer, shown in
The dryer is a sealed, automatically operated device that solves these three issues. Following is a description of the dryer system.
The feedstock is conveyed through an inlet (#8 in
The feedstock is then conveyed into an externally heated device that dries and warms the feedstock (#1 in
Heat is provided from: (i) flue gas that is generated by a burner/furnace (#9 in
The paddles in the conveyer can be plain (#3 in
Oxygen content in the device is controlled as follows. An oxygen sensor (#11 in
Moisture content in the feedstock is controlled as follows. The moisture in the feedstock is monitored in real-time and is measured on-line. The moisture in the feedstock prior to flowing into the first rotary valve is measured by a moisture meter (#16 in
The dry feedstock flows through airlock-2 (#4 in
Outlet (#10 in
Stage III—The Torrefaction Subassembly
There are two main versions of the torrefaction subassembly system. Each version is a sealed subsystem with up to three chambers and shares these common features:
A control system with an oxygen control unit keeps oxygen content below a certain value (e.g., 3%) in order to avoid fire and assert full control over the torrefaction process. Oxygen control was described above. Minimizing oxygen content in the torrefaction subassembly is achieved by a similar mechanism to that described in the dryer section (Stage II).
A separate or the same control system measures real-time, on-line the feedstock mass flow rates at the inlet and the outlet of the torrefaction subassembly from which the mass loss during torrefaction is determined. The weight loss of the feedstock during the process is thereby monitored and controlled. Mass loss is correlated to calorific value and to the volatile matter of the biocoal, as seen in
Control of the mass loss occurs as follows. Feedstock flows through inlet (#12 in
Signals of the two mass flow meters (in and out) are sent to a controller (#21 in
A scrubbing system cleans most of the acids that are released from the torrefaction process (hydrochloric, acetic, formic, lactic and other acids) and treats the water such that they can be re-circulated to the scrubber. The scrubbing system involves pumping a gas stream produced during the torrefaction process through exits #17, 18, and 19 (in
An externally heated device is optionally provided that is similar to the one described for the dryer.
There may be two or more heaters in either or both embodiments of the torrefaction subassembly. Thermal energy is provided by hot fluids, such as flue gases flowing to the inlets of the external jackets, parallel-flow to feedstock at the heater-1 (#1 in
To enhance heating efficiency a recirculation system (
A fan or an ejector (#6 in
A control system in communication with a thermocouple (#30 in
The disclosed torrefaction process can reduce chlorine content in the biocoal as much as required by regulating the torrefaction temperature and residence time by converting chlorinated compounds in the feedstock into hydrochloric acid in the gas phase. At 300° C. chlorine content reduces at a rate of 1.5-1.7% for each 1% of mass loss. This feature is helpful when feedstock contains organic chlorinated compounds because they are responsible for the hazardous emission of dioxins and furans.
Version 1 of the Torrefaction System
The weighed feedstock flows into an airlock-2 (#2 in
The feedstock then flows into a fast heater (#5 in
The hot feedstock then flows through opening #32 (in
The biocoal produced in the torrefaction reactor exits opening #33 (in
Oxygen content in the device can be controlled the same way as for Stage II. An oxygen sensor (#20 in
Version 2 of the Torrefaction System
State IV—The Particle Downsizing System
The particle downsizing system, shown in
i. cooling the biocoal to the temperature required for the compaction process;
ii. grinding the biocoal to the required size for the compaction process;
iii. keeping oxygen below a certain level to prevent fire.
The particle downsizing system is a sealed, automatically operated device that satisfies these purposes. Following is a description of the downsizing system:
Stage V—Mineral Separation From Biocoal
Biocoal that originates from any type of carbonaceous material may have mineral matter which might cause slagging in a coal-fired boiler. Hence complete or partial removal of the mineral matter will generate a beneficiated biocoal that will perform with reduced slagging in coal-fired boilers. One key to mineral separation is whether or not the mineral particles were separated or detached from the biocoal particles after grinding.
The applicants have tested various carbonaceous feedstock types (woody and herbaceous biomass, municipal solid waste, plastic waste, and others) by surface and chemical analysis techniques. They discovered that 75-95% of the mineral matter is separated (detached) from the biocoal particles. A mineral separation step (for example flotation, coal washing, gravity separation, interfacial, flocculation separation techniques) removes most of the detached mineral particles. Detachment of the mineral matter from the biocoal particles and the ability to separate these mineral particles from the coal particles enhance overall biocoal properties.
Stage VI—Compaction
The compaction stage produces highly compacted biocoal material for the following reasons:
The compaction stage involves these steps:
Exemplary compaction parameters that produce hydrophobic binderless compacted biocoal having a density of 1200-1400 kg/m3 with high durability and strength include:
Here are correlation tables of reference numerals and the components that they identify in the several Figures of the drawings:
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.