Patent Grant
7004291
The present invention generally relates to devices for controlling noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) and more particularly to a method for actively reducing or canceling vibration in a rotating shaft.
Propshafts are commonly employed for transmitting power from a rotational power source, such as the output shaft of a vehicle transmission, to a rotatably driven mechanism, such as a differential assembly. As is well known in the art, the torsional loading of the propshaft is rarely uniform over an extended period of time even at relatively constant vehicle speeds and as such, the propshaft is typically subjected to a continually varying torsional load. These variances in the torsional load carried by the propshaft tend to create torsional vibrations which may generate noise in the vehicle drivetrain or vehicle that is undesirable to passengers riding in the vehicle. In especially severe instances, the vibration that is transmitted through the propshaft can generate fatigue in the propshaft and other drivetrain components to thereby shorten the life of the vehicle drivetrain. Thus, it is desirable and advantageous to attenuate vibrations within the propshaft in order to reduce noise and guard against undue fatigue.
It is known in the art to provide tuned torsional vibrations dampers for attachment to shafts, such as crankshafts and propshafts, to attenuate torsional vibrations. This approach, however, has several drawbacks. One such drawback is that these devices are usually tuned to a specific frequency and consequently, will only damp vibrations within a relatively narrow frequency band. Accordingly, these devices are typically employed to effectively damp vibrations at a single critical frequency and offer little or no damping for vibrations which occur at other frequencies.
Another drawback with conventional mechanical damping devices relates to their incorporation into an application, such as an automotive vehicle. Generally speaking, these devices tend to have a relatively large mass, rendering their incorporation into a vehicle difficult due to their weight and overall size. Another concern is that it is frequently not possible to mount these devices in the position at which they would be most effective, as the size of the device will often not permit it to be packaged into the vehicle at a particular location.
In one form, the present teachings provide a method for damping torsional vibrations in a rotating shaft. The method includes coupling an actuator to a shaft; rotating the shaft; determining an amount of torsional vibration in the shaft; and controlling the actuator in response to the amount of torsional vibration and a rotational position of the shaft to damp the torsional vibration in the shaft.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Additional advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
With reference to
Briefly, the suspension system 18 resiliently couples the axle assembly 24 to the vehicle chassis 16. The transmission 22, which receives a rotary output from the motor 20, includes a plurality of gear ratios (not specifically shown) that are employed to selectively change the speed ratio of a transmission output shaft 22a. Rotary power is transmitted via the propshaft assembly 10 to the input pinion 24a of an axle assembly 24. The axle assembly 24 operates to selectively direct the rotary power to a pair of drive wheels 26.
With additional reference to
The dynamic damper mechanism 42 includes an inner ring 50, an outer ring 52, a resilient coupling 54, an actuator 56 and a controller 58. The inner ring 50 is coupled for rotation with the tubular body 44 of the propshaft 40 by any conventional process, including fastening, welding, bonding and/or an interference fit (e.g. press fit or shrink fit). The outer diameter of the inner ring 50 includes a plurality of circumferentially-spaced lugs 60 that extend outwardly toward the outer ring 52.
The outer ring 52 is concentrically disposed around the inner ring 50 and includes a sufficient amount of mass to accomplish the cancellation of vibration as will be discussed in detail, below. The inner side of the outer ring 52 includes a plurality of circumferentially-extending lugs 62 that extend radially inwardly toward the inner ring 50. Each of the lugs 62 is disposed between a pair of the lugs 60. The lugs 60 and 62 do not extend in so far in a radial direction that they contact the outer or inner ring 52 or 50, respectively.
The resilient coupling 54 maintains the concentric positioning of the outer ring 52 relative to the inner ring 50. The resilient coupling 54 may include a plurality of compression springs or may be an elastomeric material as is shown in the example provided.
One or more actuators 56 are disposed between the inner and outer rings 50 and 52 and in contact with the mutually opposed faces 60a and 62a of the lugs 60 and 62, respectively. The actuators 56 may use any appropriate means to extend and retract between the faces 60a and 62a, but in the particular embodiment provided, the actuators includes a magnetostrictive member whose length may be changed by varying the magnitude of an electrical charge that is applied to it. The controller 58 is electrically coupled to the actuators 56 and is operable for selectively controlling the charge that is applied to the magnetostrictive member.
During the operation of the propshaft assembly 10, the spring rate of the resilient coupling permits the outer ring 52 to damp vibrations within a predetermined frequency band. The controller 58, however, may be employed to extend or retract the actuators 56 to change the tangentially applied load on the resilient coupling 54 to thereby affect the spring rate of the resilient coupling 54. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the actuators 56 may be controlled so as to cancel-out torsional vibrations entering the axle assembly 24. More preferably, however, the actuators 56 are controlled so as to cancel out vibration that is generated by the axle assembly 24, including vibration that is generated by the meshing of the ring gear (not shown) and pinion axle gears (not shown). As this vibration is typically a function of the rotational speed of the propshaft 40, the response of the controller 58 to a given propshaft rotational speed may be preprogrammed in a look-up table 70. The controller 58 may utilize the existing vehicle sensors (not shown) and in-vehicle network (not shown) to determine the rotational speed of the propshaft 40 and thereafter control the actuators 56 according to the parameters found in the look-up table 70.
Alternatively, the controller 58 may include one or more vibration sensors 72 that are coupled to portions of the vehicle (e.g., the axle assembly 24). The vibration sensors 72 are operable for producing a vibration signal in response to sensed vibrations. The controller 58 responsively controls the actuators 56 so as to generate vibrations that are of sufficient amplitude and shifted in phase to cancel out the vibrations that are sensed by the vibration sensors 72.
While the propshaft assembly 10 has been described thus far as including a dynamic damper mechanism 42 that includes a resilient coupling that connects a pair of concentric rings, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention, in its broader aspects, may be constructed somewhat differently. As illustrated in
Each actuator 104 is disposed in a pocket 102 between the faces 106 and is selectively controllable to expand or contract in a direction that is approximately tangential to the point at which it is mounted in the ring 100. The actuators 104 may use any appropriate means to extend and retract between the faces 106, but in the particular embodiment provided, the actuators 104 include a magnetostrictive member whose length may be changed by varying the magnitude of an electrical charge that is applied to the magnetostrictive member. The controller 58′ is electrically coupled to the actuators 104 and is operable for selectively controlling the charge that is applied to the magnetostrictive member.
The controller 58′ controls the simultaneous actuation (i.e., expansion or retraction) of the actuators 104 to torsionally excite the ring 100. Like the dynamic damper mechanism 42, the actuators 104 of the dynamic damper mechanism 42′ may be controlled in a predetermined manner, such as based on the rotational speed of the propshaft 40, for example, or in response to one or more vibration signals that are generated by an associated vibration sensor.
While the invention has been described in the specification and illustrated in the drawings with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment illustrated by the drawings and described in the specification as the best mode presently contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include any embodiments falling within the foregoing description and the appended claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/269,354 filed Oct. 11, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,889,803.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3326036 | Hoeppner | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3726133 | Morgan | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3848694 | Matsui et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 4002043 | Yoshida | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4160390 | Spaetgens | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4283957 | Zobrist et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4349183 | Wirt et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4406642 | McNall | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4487592 | Strader | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4898026 | Damitz | Feb 1990 | A |
| 5145025 | Damian | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5185543 | Tebbe | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5194045 | Hanke | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5328408 | Wolf et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5352157 | Ochs et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5354237 | Amborn et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5413318 | Andreassen | May 1995 | A |
| 5419192 | Maxwell et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5468055 | Simon et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5553514 | Walkowc | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5641904 | Kopp et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5660256 | Gallmeyer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5749269 | Szymanski et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5760302 | Moradi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5829319 | Mokeddem | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5834867 | Kikuchi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5877420 | Moradi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884902 | Hamada et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5921149 | Masberg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5922952 | Moradi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5971859 | Runge et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5986545 | Sanada et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6068555 | Andra et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6131454 | Kopp et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6582125 | Lee et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6680554 | Krysinski et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6889803 | Schankin et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050051402 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10269354 | Oct 2002 | US |
| Child | 10967813 | US |
