The present invention generally relates to a method for the evaluation of noise from an axle into a vehicle and more particularly to a method for experimentally evaluating the transfer functions that dictate the amount and type of axle energy that is transferred through a vehicle suspension system into the vehicle.
Scientific evaluation of complex noise sources in automobiles, such as axles, has long been desired, particularly in view of recent advancements in the sound-proofing of modern automobiles. One problem that is encountered in this evaluation concerns the various paths through which noise may be transferred from its source into the vehicle. More specifically, the amount and type of energy that is transmitted from a noise source into the vehicle is a function of the interactions between the noise source and each item, component and/or assembly that couples the noise source to the vehicle. Without a thorough understanding and quantification of these transfer functions, the task of noise attenuation may be at least partially based upon improvements that are discovered through trial-and-error testing. Accordingly, the task of noise attenuation usually cannot be accomplished in the most expedient and efficient manner without a thorough understanding and quantification of the transfer functions that link a noise source to the vehicle.
In the context of an axle assembly, the amount and type of energy that is transmitted into the vehicle is a function of the interactions between the axle assembly and the vehicle suspension system (since the axle assembly is coupled to the vehicle suspension system) and the interactions between the vehicle suspension system and the vehicle body (since the vehicle suspension system is coupled to the vehicle body).
Mathematical (i.e., calculation-based) modeling of these transfer functions can be extremely complex and time consuming. Further complicating matters is the fact that a set of transfer functions is usually unique to a particular vehicle configuration. Changes in the suspension system, the vehicle body or the coupling of the suspension system to the vehicle body may therefore affect a vehicle's set of transfer functions to the extent that a new mathematical model would be desired.
Accordingly, there remains a need in the art for a method which improves the speed and accuracy with which a set of transfer functions that quantify the amount and type of energy that is transmitted from an axle through a vehicle suspension system are fashioned.
In one preferred form, the present invention provides a method for evaluating energy transmission into a vehicle over at least one transfer path between an axle and a vehicle suspension system. The method includes the steps of: applying a torsional input to a gearset in the axle to torsionally excite the axle in a manner that mimics the gearset's excitation of the axle during operation of the vehicle; and monitoring the energy that is transmitted through the vehicle suspension system into the vehicle via the at least one transfer path.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Additional advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
With reference to
Briefly, the suspension system 16 resiliently couples the axle assembly 24 to the chassis 14 via conventional components such as shock absorbers 26 and struts 28. The motor 18 and the transmission 20 are conventionally operable for supplying a rotary input to the axle assembly 24 via the propshaft 22.
With specific reference to
The housing 36 is typically formed in a suitable casting process and is thereafter machined as required. The housing 36 includes a wall member 48 that defines a central cavity 50 having a left axle aperture 52 and a right axle aperture 54.
The left axle shaft assembly 32 includes a first axle tube 60, which extends into the left axle aperture 52 and is fixedly coupled to the housing 36, as well as a first axle half-shaft 62 that is supported for rotation in the first axle tube 60 about the first axis 42. Similarly, the right axle shaft assembly 34 includes a second axle tube 64, which extends into the right axle aperture 54 and is fixedly coupled to the housing 36, as well as a second axle half-shaft 66 that is supported for rotation in the second axle tube 64 about the first axis 42.
The differential unit 38 is disposed within the central cavity 50 of the housing 36 and includes a case 70, a ring gear 72 that is fixed for rotation with the case 70, and a differential gearset 74 that is disposed within the case 70. The differential gearset 74 includes first and second side gears 76 and 78, respectively, and a plurality of differential pinions 80 that are rotatably supported on pinion shafts 82 that are mounted to the case 70. The case 70 includes a pair of trunnions 84 and 86 and a gear cavity 88. A pair of bearing assemblies 90 are shown to support the trunnions 84 and 86 for rotation about the first axis 42. The first axle half-shaft 62 and the second axle half-shaft 66 extend through the left and right axle apertures 52 and 54, respectively, and are coupled for rotation with the first and second side gears 76 and 78, respectively. The case 70 is operable for supporting the plurality of differential pinions 80 for rotation within the gear cavity 88 about one or more axes that are perpendicular to the first axis 42. The first and second side gears 76 and 78 each include a plurality of teeth 94 that meshingly engage teeth 96 that are formed on the differential pinions 80.
The input shaft assembly 40 extends through the input shaft aperture 98 and includes an input pinion shaft 100, a conventional propshaft coupling flange 102 and a pair of conventional bearing assemblies 104. Each of the bearing assemblies 104 is coupled to the housing 36 and supports the input pinion shaft 100 for rotation about the second axis 44. The input pinion shaft 100 includes a plurality of pinion teeth 106 that meshingly engage the ring gear 72. Accordingly, rotary power transmitted to the input pinion shaft 100 (via the propshaft 22) is communicated to the ring gear 72 which serves to rotate the case 70 to thereby transmit the rotary power through the differential gearset 74 and to the first and second axle half-shafts 62 and 66 in a predetermined manner.
As the vehicle body 12 is coupled to the chassis 14, noise generated by the axle assembly 24 during the operation of the vehicle 10 is able to migrate into the vehicle passenger compartment 12a where it would be felt or heard by the vehicle passengers. One component of the noise that is generated by the axle assembly 24 is induced by subtle variances in the formation of each tooth in the axle gearset 110 (i.e., the input pinion teeth 106, the ring gear 72, and the differential gearset 74), as well as subtle variances in the location of each tooth relative to the pitch diameter of its associated gear and in the mounting of the gear relative to the other gears in the axle gearset 110. Another component of the noise that is generated by the axle assembly is gearset motion variation, which may be described as an acceleration (positive or negative) that migrates through the axle gearset 110 in response to variances in the magnitude of the rotary input (i.e., torque or speed) that is transmitted to the axle gearset 110 via the propshaft 22.
With additional reference to
An actuator 140, which is coupled to the input shaft assembly 40 (e.g., to the propshaft coupling flange 102, is configured to apply a torsional input to the axle assembly 24. In the particular embodiment illustrated, the actuator 140 includes a servo-control system 142 having a controller 144, a hydraulic pump 146 and a linear actuator 148 that is coupled in fluid connection to the hydraulic pump 146.
Preferably, the torsional input excites the axle gearset 110 in a manner that mimics the excitation of the axle gearset 110 as it would ordinarily be during the normal operation of the vehicle 10. Accordingly, the controller 144 is employed to regulate and control the magnitude of the torsional input. More specifically, the controller 144 controls the actuator 140 (i.e., the hydraulic pump 146) in a manner such that a first portion of the torsional input simulates a powertrain input torque (i.e., a torque that is delivered to the axle assembly 24 from the propshaft 22 for propelling the vehicle 10) and a second portion of the torsional input simulates a torsional vibration induced by gearset motion variation. Preferably, the first portion is static and approximately constant over a predetermined time increment, while the second portion is dynamic and oscillates over the same time increment.
Vibrations transmitted through the suspension system 16 and into the vehicle body 12 are sensed by the vibration sensors 130, which produces an associated array of sensor signals in response thereto. The sensor signals permit the technician to evaluate the relative degree to which noise induced by gearset motion variation is transmitted into the vehicle passenger compartment 12a. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the energy that is input by the actuator to the axle assembly 24 may be readily quantified and monitored and as such, noise dampening efforts may be tailored to meet a given noise threshold in a manner that is both convenient and cost effective.
While the invention has been described in the specification and illustrated in the drawings with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment illustrated by the drawings and described in the specification as the best mode presently contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include any embodiments falling within the foregoing description and the appended claims.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/269,578 filed Oct. 11, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,802,206 entitled “Torsional Actuation NVH Test Method”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3326036 | Hoeppner | Jun 1967 | A |
3726133 | Morgan | Apr 1973 | A |
3770077 | Johnson | Nov 1973 | A |
3848694 | Matsui et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3921746 | Lewus | Nov 1975 | A |
4002043 | Yoshida | Jan 1977 | A |
4103532 | Buzzi | Aug 1978 | A |
4160390 | Spaetgens | Jul 1979 | A |
4283957 | Zobrist et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4406642 | McNall | Sep 1983 | A |
4487592 | Strader | Dec 1984 | A |
4646210 | Skogler et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4898026 | Damitz | Feb 1990 | A |
5145025 | Damian | Sep 1992 | A |
5185543 | Tebbe | Feb 1993 | A |
5194045 | Hanke | Mar 1993 | A |
5328408 | Wolf et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5352157 | Ochs et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354237 | Amborn et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5419192 | Maxwell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5553514 | Walkowc | Sep 1996 | A |
5641904 | Kopp et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5660256 | Gallmeyer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5749269 | Szymanski et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760302 | Moradi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5829319 | Mokeddem | Nov 1998 | A |
5877420 | Moradi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884902 | Hamada et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5922952 | Moradi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5971859 | Runge et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986545 | Sanada et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6068555 | Andra et al. | May 2000 | A |
6131454 | Kopp et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6389888 | Juranitch et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6454674 | Krzesicki et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6619672 | Charaudeau et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626787 | Porter | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6802206 | Kurecka et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050022580 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10269578 | Oct 2002 | US |
Child | 10932715 | US |