Total reverse shoulder systems and methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11771561
  • Patent Number
    11,771,561
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 22, 2022
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 3, 2023
    7 months ago
Abstract
A reverse shoulder system can include, for example, a glenoid baseplate comprising a longitudinal axis, the glenoid baseplate further including a stem and a central channel within a sidewall of the stem. The stem can include a longitudinal axis. The longitudinal axis of the glenoid baseplate can be angled with respect to the longitudinal axis of the stem, wherein the longitudinal axis of the glenoid baseplate is not perpendicular with respect to the longitudinal axis of the stem. Other components including a glenosphere, tools, and methods of use are also disclosed.
Description
BACKGROUND

Shoulder replacement is a commonly performed medical procedure for treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, as well as for treatment of certain deformities related to oncological indications as well as trauma. There are two primary types of articulations available to surgeons for treatment: anatomic and reverse. With anatomic, the surgeon replaces the articular surfaces with industrial materials such that the articulating surfaces are substantially the same shape as the natural anatomy. A stem can be commonly fixed inside the canal of the humerus, a metallic articular head can be rigidly fixed to the proximal aspect of the same, the articular head having a convex articular surface adapted to articulate with the glenoid implant. The glenoid implant can include on its back side (medial side) certain pegs or posts or fins adapted to be rigidly fixed within the glenoid fossa of the scapula and on its front side a concave or flat articular surface adapted to articulate with the humeral head of the humeral implant.


When a reverse prosthesis is used, the articular surface is reversed in that the metallic ball is rigidly fixed to the glenoid fossa of the scapula, and the concave articular surface is rigidly fixed to the humeral bone, thereby reversing the fashion of articulation of the prosthesis.


The surgeon chooses between the two types of prostheses by assessing a number of conditions of the patient including level of pain, patient activity level, deformity or severity of the boney degradation, the strength of surrounding soft tissues, and present or absence of prior surgery, and particularly the health and strength of the rotator cuff muscle and tendon. Disease of the rotator cuff is common among patients with arthritis of the shoulder. In this circumstance, it is commonly observed that the absence of insufficiency of the rotator cuff leads to a condition where the anatomic shoulder replacement prosthesis is not sufficiently stabilized by surrounding soft tissue. In this case, a reverse shoulder replacement prosthesis can be preferred in some cases due to the higher inherent stability of the articulation. In addition, the reverse prosthesis can advantageously utilize the remaining muscles in a way they can be more effective in the absence of the other soft tissue structures by adjusting the position of the articular surfaces within the joint.


SUMMARY

In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a reverse shoulder system, comprising any number of a glenoid baseplate comprising a longitudinal axis, the glenoid baseplate further comprising a stem and a central channel within a sidewall of the stem, the stem comprising a longitudinal axis. The longitudinal axis of the glenoid baseplate can be angled with respect to the longitudinal axis of the stem, wherein the longitudinal axis of the glenoid baseplate is not perpendicular with respect to the longitudinal axis of the stem.


In some configurations, the glenoid baseplate comprises a generally disc-shaped portion extending radially outward from the central channel.


In some configurations, the stem comprises a sidewall that extends superiorly with respect to the disc portion.


In some configurations, the glenoid baseplate comprises a peripheral edge.


In some configurations, the peripheral edge comprises spaced-apart anti-rotation features.


In some configurations, the anti-rotation features comprise slots.


In some configurations, an inferior portion of the peripheral edge comprises a porous coating.


In some configurations, an inferior surface of the generally disc-shaped portion comprises a porous coating, but a superior surface does not comprise a porous coating.


In some configurations, the peripheral edge and/or an inferior surface of the baseplate comprises a conical geometry.


In some configurations, an inferior surface of the baseplate is concave.


In some configurations, the stem comprises a Morse taper lock superior to a superior-most portion of the generally disc-shaped portion of the glenoid baseplate.


In some configurations, the system further comprises a glenosphere.


In some configurations, the glenosphere comprises a superior dome-shaped surface comprising a rotational control feature configured such that an inserter tool can lock the glenosphere and the baseplate to allow for rotation of the glenosphere and the baseplate together.


In some configurations, the rotational control feature comprises a spline.


In some configurations, the system further comprises a central set screw and locking nut.


In some configurations, the system further comprises a central compression screw non-integral with the baseplate and configured for placement adjacent and distal to the central set screw.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These drawings are illustrative embodiments and do not present all possible embodiments of this invention.



FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of components of a total reverse shoulder system.



FIG. 2 illustrates various embodiments of humeral trays that can be utilized with total reverse shoulder systems, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 3 illustrates a variety of humeral bearing components that can be utilized with total reverse shoulder systems, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 4 illustrates schematically an embodiment of a glenoid baseplate configured to be inset into the glenoid.



FIG. 5 illustrates schematically an embodiment of a glenoid baseplate 500 configured to be inset into the glenoid.



FIG. 6 illustrates a threaded locking insert for a central channel of a stem/post, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 7 illustrates various views of glenospheres, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 8 illustrates a schematic cross-section of a fully assembled glenosphere with a locking bolt, according to some embodiments.



FIGS. 8A-8U illustrate a glenoid surgical technique, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of a sizer/angle guide.



FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of a stem drill guide.



FIG. 11 schematically illustrates a stem angle change with a rotational adjustment.



FIG. 12 schematically illustrates views of a glenoid baseplate inserter (alone on the left and together with a baseplate on the right), according to some embodiments.



FIG. 13 schematically illustrates views of a calibrated central drill, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 14 schematically illustrates views of fixed angle peripheral drill guides, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 15 schematically illustrates views of variable angle peripheral drill guides, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 16 schematically illustrates side and top views of central screws, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 17 schematically illustrates side and top views of fixed angle peripheral compression screws, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 18 schematically illustrates side and top views of variable angle peripheral screws, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 19 schematically illustrates views of a glenosphere inserter, according to some embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In some embodiments, disclosed herein are various embodiments of a total reverse shoulder system, including a variety of humeral trays, humeral bearings, inset glenoid baseplates, threaded locking inserts, and glenospheres. Glenoid surgical techniques are also described, which can utilize various tools including but not limited to sizer/angle guides, stem drill guides, glenoid baseplate inserters, calibrated central drills, peripheral drill guides with fixed or variable angles, central screws, fixed angle peripheral compression screws, variable angle peripheral screws, and glenosphere inserters. Dimensions listed on the accompanying Figures are non-limiting examples only.



FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of components of a total reverse shoulder system, including a glenosphere 200 and a glenoid baseplate 102 which can be partially or completely inset in some embodiments. The glenoid baseplate 102 can be a generally disc-shaped structure and include a central aperture defining a surface of (e.g., integral with an elongate stem), or configured to fit an elongate stem or post therethrough. The glenoid baseplate 102 can include a longitudinal axis that is at an angle to a longitudinal axis of the elongate stem 100. The longitudinal axis of the glenoid baseplate 102 can be at an angle, such as generally oblique with respect to the longitudinal axis of the elongate stem 100. In some embodiments, the angle is an acute angle, and not a right angle. The angle between the two intersecting longitudinal axes of the respective baseplate 102 and the stem 100 could be, for example, about, at least about, or no more than about 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, or more or less degrees, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values.



FIG. 2 illustrates various embodiments of humeral trays that can be utilized with total reverse shoulder systems, according to some embodiments. The humeral trays can include various inner diameters IDs and outer diameters ODs, including 30 mm, 32 mm, 34 mm, 36 mm, 38 mm, 40 mm, 42 mm, or more or less IDs and/or ODs, and ranges including any two of the foregoing values. The trays can include one or more pegs, such as a central peg extending from a medial surface. The trays can be neutral, or include extensions (e.g., in thickness) that can be, for example, +2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 mm, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. The trays can include various cross-sections, including oval or round cross-sections. The trays can be compatible with the same poly bearing surfaces in some cases. In some embodiments, a kit can include at least four different sizes of trays (34 mm oval neutral; 34 mm oval+6 mm extension; 38 mm round neutral; 38 mm round+6 mm extension.



FIG. 3 illustrates a variety of humeral bearing components that can be utilized with total reverse shoulder systems, according to some embodiments, including humeral trays as illustrated and described in connection with FIG. 2. The bearing components can include, for example, a peripheral ring 302 and a central recessed portion that can be outlined radially outwardly by an inner edge of the peripheral ring, and an inner bowl-shaped portion 304. The peripheral ring can include indicia, such as a slot or other marking 399 illustrating the highest point of the bearing component. Also illustrated is the recessed poly dome 395, and a partial or full annular barb 397 around the outer circumference of the bearing component. The bearing component can include a variety of geometries include neutral, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 degree angles to horizontal, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. In some embodiments, the bearing component does not change the joint center. In some embodiments, the bearing component can include 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 mm, or more or less spherical diameters, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. In some embodiments, systems and methods can include an offset of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 mm, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values.



FIG. 4 illustrates schematically an embodiment of a glenoid baseplate configured to be inset into the glenoid G as illustrated. The longitudinal axis of the baseplate can be angled with respect to the longitudinal axis of the stem/post as described, for example, with respect to FIG. 1, and can include a version change 499 to compensate for posterior bony defects. In some embodiments, the glenoid baseplate includes a central channel therethrough defining a surface of (e.g., integral with an elongate stem), or configured to fit configured to house a stem/post as shown. The glenoid baseplate can include a generally conical shape with a concave undersurface configured to rest within a reamed surface of glenoid bone, which advantageously allows for a single rotary reamer to be utilized, in contrast to conventional glenoid baseplates with flat undersurfaces that require a two-step reaming process. The post 493 can have a length of about, at least about, or no more than about 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10, 10.5, 11, 11.5, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15 mm or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. In some embodiments, the central channel and/or stem can include a female Morse taper 497 of about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more or less degrees, including ranges incorporating any two of the foregoing values. As shown in the right illustration of FIG. 4, the baseplate can be configured to pivot around the stem/taper at arrow 495 for version correction and to allow for a direct bone-implant interface without requiring augmentation. In some embodiments, the system can be configured to provide version angle corrections of, for example, about 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, 20 degrees or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. In some embodiments, the baseplate could have a diameter of about, at least about, or no more than about 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 mm, or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. The baseplate can advantageously pivot around the central stem with a Morse taper for version correction and allows for a direct bone-implant interface.



FIG. 5 illustrates schematically an embodiment of a glenoid baseplate 500 configured to be inset into the glenoid (not shown in FIG. 5). The longitudinal axis of the baseplate 500 can be angled with respect to the longitudinal axis of the stem/post 510 as described, for example, with respect to FIGS. 1 and 4 above. The baseplate 500 could have a generally arcuate peripheral edge. The peripheral edge could include spaced-apart anti-rotational slots 521 directed generally transverse to a longitudinal plane of the baseplate 500. In some embodiments, the peripheral edge of the baseplate 500 can taper (e.g., decrease) in diameter from a superior to inferior dimension. A central channel can extend through the baseplate 500, as well as include a superiorly-extending sidewall or lip 511 somewhat similar to the side slopes of a volcano. The central channel can define a surface of (e.g., integral with an elongate stem), or configured to fit be configured to house the stem/post 510 therethrough. The baseplate 500 can also include a plurality of regularly or irregularly spaced-apart secondary (peripheral) channels 555 spaced radially outward from the central channel of the baseplate and configured to house fixed and variable angle screws therethrough. The secondary channels 555 can be asymmetric and include superiorly-extending portions 556 that can extend into and interrupt the superiorly-extending sidewall or lip 511 of the central channel of the baseplate 500. The baseplate 500 can include a porous coating 585 on the entire, or only a part of the peripheral edge and/or an inferior surface (e.g., undersurface) of the baseplate 500 to promote bone ingrowth, for example.


Still referring to FIG. 5, the stem/post 510 could have an internal taper, such as a Morse taper, of about, at least about, or no more than about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 degrees, or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. The stem/post 510 can also include a rotational control feature 545 along an outer diameter of the stem/post 510, and in some embodiments superiorly with respect to the uppermost surface of the sidewall 511 of the central channel of the glenoid baseplate 500 as shown. The rotational control feature 545 could be non-circular or non-arcuate, such as a hexagonal shape as shown for example. The stem/post 510 can also include a central channel and include a Morse taper lock 535 configured to mate with a glenosphere (not shown). The Morse taper lock can extend superiorly with respect to the uppermost surface of the sidewall 511 of the central channel of the glenoid baseplate 500. The central channel of the stem/post 510 can be configured to house a primary screw (not shown) therethrough, which can be a variable angle primary screw, and optionally locking.



FIG. 6 illustrates a threaded locking insert 600 for a central channel of a stem/post, according to some embodiments. The insert 600 can include an outer male thread 602 and configured to go into the central channel of a baseplate. The outer diameter of the insert can also include a hexagonal geometry portion 604 at the superior end, of about, at least about, or no more than about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 mm or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. The hexagonal geometry portion 604 can be configured to serve as a rotational control feature in some embodiments. The insert 600 can also include a female thread 608 configured to receive a supplemental glenosphere locking screw (not shown), and a spherical surface 612, for example, at its inferior end to lock a variable angle screw.



FIG. 7 illustrates various views of glenospheres, according to some embodiments. The left image illustrates a glenosphere with a rotational control feature 702, which can include a spline, such as an asymmetric spline, and configured to advantageously allow for rotational control about the spline and allow an inserter tool to lock and rotate the glenosphere together with another component, such as a baseplate. The glenosphere can also include one or more indicia, such as an eccentric rotational mark 704. The glenosphere can include a generally dome-shaped surface 714, a cavity 706 with an inferior-facing opening 708, and a hollow post including a morse taper lock 711 into the baseplate. The glenosphere could be a full hemisphere, or short of a full hemisphere by a distance 720 of about, at least about, or no more than about 0.5 mm, 0.75 mm, 1 mm, 1.25 mm, 1.5 mm, 1.75 mm, 2 mm, 2.25 mm, 2.5 mm, 2.75 mm, 3 mm, or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values.


Still referring to FIG. 7, in some embodiments, the glenosphere can include an articulating diameter of about, at least about, or no more than about 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 mm, or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. In some embodiments, systems and methods can include an offset and/or eccentric dimension of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 mm, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. In some embodiments, the glenosphere has a neutral geometry. In some embodiments, a glenosphere 724 is offset by about +3 mm or about 6 mm, for example. In some embodiments, a glenosphere 722 has an eccentric dimension of between about 2 mm and about 4 mm. In some embodiments, a secondary locking screw can be utilized together with the glenosphere.



FIG. 8 illustrates a schematic cross-section of a fully assembled glenosphere with a locking bolt, according to some embodiments, along with the baseplate. The glenosphere can include a central channel therethrough including a rotational control feature 702 at, for example, a superior-most portion that can be as described elsewhere herein. The central channel can also include a threaded surface 808 for an inserter/head extractor, such as inferior to the rotational control feature 702, and optionally be configured to accommodate a secondary locking screw at 810, to push and/or rotate with the post of the baseplate. A post of the glenosphere can be placed at least partially within a central channel of the baseplate as illustrated. A central set screw/locking nut 814 can be connected to, and in some cases removably attachable to a central channel, e.g., of the glenoid baseplate, and have an end adjacent or directly touching an end of a central compression screw 816, which can include a diameter of, for example, of about, at least about, or no more than about 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10 mm, or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. The central compression screw can be configured to angulate with respect to the baseplate, and advantageously allow for the use of a locking screw.



FIGS. 8A-8U illustrate a glenoid surgical technique, according to some embodiments, which can include any number of the following actions. FIG. 8A illustrates a glenoid surface with an A3-E3 defect. A sizer/angle guide can be placed as in FIG. 8B. A wire guide/wire can be placed in FIG. 8C. The wire guide and sizer/angle guide can be removed, as in FIG. 8D. The glenoid surface can then be reamed for the baseplate, as in FIGS. 8E and 8F. The stem drill guide can then be placed and adjusted in FIG. 8G. A hole for a stem can then be drilled in FIGS. 8H and 8. The baseplate can then be inserted, as shown in FIG. 8J, and the threaded rod removed, as shown in FIG. 8K. A central cavity can be drilled, and the length of a central screw to be placed determined, in FIG. 8L. The drill can be removed in FIG. 8M, and the screw and screwdriver placed through the shaft, and the screw tightened in FIG. 8N. The baseplate inserter handle can be removed in FIG. 8O, and holes can be drilled for the peripheral locking screws in FIG. 8P. Holes can be drilled for variable angle screws, as shown in FIG. 8Q. The peripheral screws can be inserted and tightened in FIG. 8R. The central set screws and secondary locking nuts can be inserted and tightened in FIG. 8S. The glenosphere can be inserted in FIG. 8T, and the locking bolt inserted and tightened in FIG. 8U.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of a sizer/angle guide including an inferior tilt mechanism 902. The mechanism could be fixed to a set angle (e.g., about 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 degrees, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values), or adjustable in some embodiments. The mechanism could be round or oval shaped in some embodiments, and include a slot (e.g., posterior or posterior inferior) to allow for removal. The inferior tilt mechanism 902 could include a set screw with a calibrated window, or individual depth screws in some cases.



FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of a stem drill guide, that can include a diameter of about, at least about, or no more than about 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 mm or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. The drill guide could include a version angle of, for example, about 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 degrees or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing vales. In some embodiments, the larger the version angle, the more stem tilt is generated as rotation occurs.



FIG. 11 schematically illustrates a stem angle change with a rotational adjustment (e.g., about 30 degrees), and an angled version plate (e.g., about 15 degrees) as a non-limiting example. Anterior-posterior and inferior-superior views are illustrated.



FIG. 12 schematically illustrates views of a glenoid baseplate inserter (alone on the left and together with a baseplate on the right), according to some embodiments. The baseplate inserter can be configured for any number of: positive rotational control; slim design to allow visualization through screw holes to know when seated; and/or a multi-function handle allows for drilling central screw hole, and inserting a central screw.



FIG. 13 schematically illustrates views of a calibrated central drill, according to some embodiments. Calibrated marks/indicia 902 at spaced-apart desired increments (e.g., 5 mm increments in some embodiments) near the proximal end of the instrument can help to determine the length of a central screw that may be needed. The calibration length can start at, for example, about, at least about, or no more than about 15 mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, 30 mm, 35 mm, 40 mm, or more or less, including any two of the foregoing values and may advantageously allow for a surgical step to be cut out.



FIG. 14 schematically illustrates views of fixed angle peripheral drill guides, according to some embodiments. The drill guides can be configured to fit over a geometry, such as a polygonal shaped portion (e.g., octagon) on the top of the baseplate, and the operator can then determine which fixed angle screws to drill.



FIG. 15 schematically illustrates views of variable angle peripheral drill guides, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 16 schematically illustrates side and top views of central screws, according to some embodiments, including a head 1601, threaded shaft 1602, and distal tapered portion. In one embodiment, the screw can have a 6.5 mm head, and 6 mm threaded shaft, although various size ranges and increments are possible, including about, at least about, or no more than about 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10 mm, or more or less head and/or threaded shaft diameters, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. In some embodiments, a central screw can include a total or working length of about, at least about, or no more than about 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70 mm, or more or less, or ranges including any two of the foregoing values. In some embodiments, anodization of the screw can optionally be present to help differentiate the screws. The screw head could have various internal feature geometries 1603, including a T20 hexalobe configuration in some embodiments.



FIG. 17 schematically illustrates side and top views of fixed angle peripheral compression screws, according to some embodiments, including a head 1701, double-lead thread 1703 proximal to a threaded shaft 1702, and distal tapered portion. The screws can be various size ranges and increments, and include T20 hexalobe or other internal head feature geometries 1704 as described elsewhere herein. In one embodiment, the head could be about 5.7 mm in diameter, with a 4.5 mm threaded shaft diameter, or dimensions listed elsewhere herein, such as in connection with FIG. 16 for example.



FIG. 18 schematically illustrates side and top views of variable angle peripheral screws, according to some embodiments, including a head 1801, threaded shaft 1802, and distal tapered portion. The screws can be various size ranges and increments, and include T20 hexalobe or other internal head feature geometries 1803 as described elsewhere herein. In one embodiment, the head could be about 5.7 mm in diameter, with a 4.5 mm threaded shaft diameter, or dimensions listed elsewhere herein, such as in connection with FIG. 16 or 17 for example.



FIG. 19 schematically illustrates views of a glenosphere inserter, according to some embodiments, which can include a distal end with a feature complementary to a spline on the glenosphere, such as described in connection with FIG. 7, for example. The glenosphere inserter can be configured to, for example, advantageously provide positive attachment to the glenosphere; allow for solid rotational control while inserting; and/or may involve a secondary impaction step after removal.


In some embodiments, embodiments of the invention can be used or modified with use with particular advantages of using inset glenoid fixation technology in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty, such as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,007,538 and/or 8,778,028 to Gunther, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. Furthermore, embodiments of the invention can be used or modified with use with systems and methods as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pub. No. 2018/0368982 to Ball, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


Various other modifications, adaptations, and alternative designs are of course possible in light of the above teachings. Therefore, it should be understood at this time that within the scope of the appended claims the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. It is contemplated that various combinations or subcombinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments disclosed above may be made and still fall within one or more of the inventions. Further, the disclosure herein of any particular feature, aspect, method, property, characteristic, quality, attribute, element, or the like in connection with an embodiment can be used in all other embodiments set forth herein. Accordingly, it should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed inventions. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present inventions herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above. Moreover, while the invention is susceptible to various modifications, and alternative forms, specific examples thereof have been shown in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not to be limited to the particular forms or methods disclosed, but to the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the various embodiments described and the appended claims. Any methods disclosed herein need not be performed in the order recited. The methods disclosed herein include certain actions taken by a practitioner; however, they can also include any third-party instruction of those actions, either expressly or by implication. For example, actions such as “insetting an implant into a glenoid cavity” includes “instructing the insetting of an implant into the glenoid cavity.” The ranges disclosed herein also encompass any and all overlap, sub-ranges, and combinations thereof. Language such as “up to,” “at least,” “greater than,” “less than,” “between,” and the like includes the number recited. Numbers preceded by a term such as “approximately”, “about”, and “substantially” as used herein include the recited numbers (e.g., about 10%=10%), and also represent an amount close to the stated amount that still performs a desired function or achieves a desired result. For example, the terms “approximately”, “about”, and “substantially” may refer to an amount that is within less than 10% of, within less than 5% of, within less than 1% of, within less than 0.1% of, and within less than 0.01% of the stated amount.

Claims
  • 1. A reverse shoulder implant, comprising: a baseplate configured to be secured to a glenoid of a scapular bone of patient, the baseplate having a lateral end, a medial end, and a central channel extending therethrough from the lateral end to the medial end;a central screw sized to at least partially pass through the central channel and secure the baseplate to the glenoid of the patient;a locking nut having a cylindrical shape, an external thread on an outside surface of the locking nut and an internal thread on an internal surface of the locking nut, the locking nut configured to engage the central screw when the central screw and baseplate are implanted within the medical patient, wherein the external thread is configured to secure the locking nut to the central channel of the baseplate;a glenosphere, having a lateral, convex articular side, a medial side, and a central channel extending from the convex articular side to the medial side and configured to interface with the baseplate; anda glenosphere screw, sized to pass at least partially within the glenosphere central channel and having external threads sized to secure the glenosphere screw to the internal thread on the internal surface of the locking nut to secure the glenosphere to the locking nut.
  • 2. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 1, wherein the glenosphere further comprises a stem configured to be positioned at least partially within the central channel of the baseplate.
  • 3. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 1, wherein the glenosphere is configured to at least partially surround an external surface of the baseplate.
  • 4. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 1, wherein the baseplate has a circular shape.
  • 5. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 1, wherein the glenosphere is configured to surround the baseplate.
  • 6. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 1, wherein the glenosphere is configured to be secured to the baseplate with a morse taper.
  • 7. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 1, wherein a diameter of the locking nut is greater than a length of the locking nut.
  • 8. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 1, wherein the locking nut comprises a rotational control feature configured to receive a tool to enable twisting of the locking nut to secure it to the central screw.
  • 9. A reverse shoulder implant, comprising: a baseplate configured to be secured to a glenoid of a scapular bone of patient, the baseplate having a lateral end, a medial end, and a central channel extending therethrough from the lateral end to the medial end;a central screw sized to at least partially pass through the central channel and secure the baseplate to the glenoid of the patient;a locking nut having a cylindrical shape, an external thread on an outside surface of the locking nut and an internal thread on an internal surface of the locking nut, the locking nut configured to engage the central screw when the central screw and baseplate are implanted within the medical patient, wherein the external thread is configured to engage the central channel of the baseplate; anda glenosphere, having a lateral, convex articular side, a medial side, and a central channel extending from the convex articular side to the medial side and configured to interface with the baseplate; and a glenosphere screw, sized to pass at least partially within the glenosphere central channel and having external threads sized to secure the glenosphere screw to the internal thread on the internal surface of the locking nut to secure the glenosphere to the locking nut.
  • 10. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 9, wherein the glenosphere further comprises a stem configured to be positioned at least partially within the central channel of the baseplate.
  • 11. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 9, wherein the glenosphere is configured to at least partially surround an external surface of the baseplate.
  • 12. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 9, wherein the baseplate has a circular shape.
  • 13. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 9, wherein the glenosphere is configured to surround the baseplate.
  • 14. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 9, wherein the glenosphere is configured to be secured to the baseplate with a morse taper.
  • 15. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 9, wherein a diameter of the locking nut is greater than a length of the locking nut.
  • 16. The reverse shoulder implant of claim 9, wherein the locking nut comprises a rotational control feature configured to receive a tool to enable twisting of the locking nut to secure it to the central screw.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/435,333, filed Aug. 31, 2021, which is the national phase of International Application No. PCT/US2020/022094, filed Mar. 11, 2020, which claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional No. 62/816,708, filed Mar. 11, 2019, which are all hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (239)
Number Name Date Kind
2781758 Jacques Feb 1957 A
3979778 Stroot Sep 1976 A
4003095 Gristina Jan 1977 A
4045826 Stroot Sep 1977 A
4206517 Pappas et al. Jun 1980 A
4261062 Amstutz et al. Apr 1981 A
4404693 Zweymuller Sep 1983 A
4550450 Kinnett Nov 1985 A
4865605 Dines et al. Sep 1989 A
4964865 Burkhead et al. Oct 1990 A
4986833 Worland Jan 1991 A
4990161 Kampner Feb 1991 A
5030219 Matsen, III et al. Jul 1991 A
5032132 Matsen, III et al. Jul 1991 A
5080673 Burkhead et al. Jan 1992 A
5108440 Grundei Apr 1992 A
5282865 Dong Feb 1994 A
5314479 Rockwood, Jr. et al. May 1994 A
5314489 Hoffman et al. May 1994 A
5344458 Bonutti Sep 1994 A
5358525 Fox et al. Oct 1994 A
5370694 Davidson Dec 1994 A
5437677 Shearer et al. Aug 1995 A
5462563 Shearer et al. Oct 1995 A
5489309 Lackey et al. Feb 1996 A
5489310 Mikhail Feb 1996 A
5507819 Wolf Apr 1996 A
5514184 Doi May 1996 A
5549683 Bonutti Aug 1996 A
5593448 Dong Jan 1997 A
5702447 Walch Dec 1997 A
5702486 Craig et al. Dec 1997 A
5755811 Tanamal et al. May 1998 A
5769856 Dong et al. Jun 1998 A
5800551 Williamson et al. Sep 1998 A
5928285 Bigliani et al. Jul 1999 A
6037724 Buss et al. Mar 2000 A
6228119 Ondria et al. May 2001 B1
6231913 Schwimmer et al. May 2001 B1
6290726 Pope et al. Sep 2001 B1
6334874 Tornier et al. Jan 2002 B1
6364910 Shultz et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368353 Arcand Apr 2002 B1
6379386 Resch et al. Apr 2002 B1
6458136 Allard et al. Oct 2002 B1
6514287 Ondria et al. Feb 2003 B2
6520964 Tallarida et al. Feb 2003 B2
6589281 Hyde, Jr. Jul 2003 B2
6610067 Tallarida et al. Aug 2003 B2
6620197 Maroney Sep 2003 B2
6673115 Resch et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679916 Frankie et al. Jan 2004 B1
6679917 Ek Jan 2004 B2
6699289 Iannotti et al. Mar 2004 B2
6709463 Pope et al. Mar 2004 B1
6712823 Grusin et al. Mar 2004 B2
6761740 Tornier Jul 2004 B2
6783549 Stone et al. Aug 2004 B1
6875234 Lipman et al. Apr 2005 B2
6953478 Bouttens Oct 2005 B2
7011686 Ball et al. Mar 2006 B2
7044973 Rockwood et al. May 2006 B2
7238089 Tsumuraya et al. Jul 2007 B2
7238208 Camino et al. Jul 2007 B2
7294149 Hozack et al. Nov 2007 B2
7320709 Felt et al. Jan 2008 B2
7329284 Maroney et al. Feb 2008 B2
7465319 Tornier Dec 2008 B2
7517364 Long et al. Apr 2009 B2
7618462 Ek Nov 2009 B2
7678151 Ek Mar 2010 B2
7749278 Frederick et al. Jul 2010 B2
7766969 Justin Aug 2010 B2
7776098 Murphy Aug 2010 B2
7892287 Deffenbaugh Feb 2011 B2
7922769 Deffenbaugh et al. Apr 2011 B2
8007538 Gunther Aug 2011 B2
8038719 Gunther Oct 2011 B2
8048161 Guederian et al. Nov 2011 B2
8048167 Dietz et al. Nov 2011 B2
8177786 Leyden et al. May 2012 B2
8529629 Angibaud et al. Sep 2013 B2
8608805 Forrer et al. Dec 2013 B2
8778028 Gunther et al. Jul 2014 B2
8840671 Ambacher Sep 2014 B2
8870962 Roche et al. Oct 2014 B2
8920508 Iannotti et al. Dec 2014 B2
8940054 Wiley et al. Jan 2015 B2
9114017 Lappin Aug 2015 B2
9283083 Winslow Mar 2016 B2
9381086 Ries et al. Jul 2016 B2
9545311 Courtney, Jr. et al. Jan 2017 B2
9545312 Tornier et al. Jan 2017 B2
9610166 Gunther et al. Apr 2017 B2
9615839 Olson Apr 2017 B2
9693784 Gunther Jul 2017 B2
9867710 Pria et al. Jan 2018 B2
10143559 Ries et al. Dec 2018 B2
10357373 Gargac Jul 2019 B2
10492926 Gunther Dec 2019 B1
10702390 Chavarria et al. Jul 2020 B2
10779952 Gunther et al. Sep 2020 B2
10786265 Gunther Sep 2020 B2
10925745 Cardon Feb 2021 B2
11065125 Ball Jul 2021 B2
11166733 Neichel Nov 2021 B2
11259931 Pressacco et al. Mar 2022 B2
11464645 Cardon Oct 2022 B2
11564802 Ball Jan 2023 B2
D977643 Ball et al. Feb 2023 S
20010011192 Ondria et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010037153 Rockwood, Jr. et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047210 Wolf Nov 2001 A1
20020055783 Tallarida et al. May 2002 A1
20020082702 Resch et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087213 Bertram, III Jul 2002 A1
20020095214 Hyde, Jr. Jul 2002 A1
20020111689 Hyde, Jr. et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020138148 Hyde, Jr. et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030100952 Rockwood, Jr. et al. May 2003 A1
20030114933 Bouttens et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030125809 Iannotti et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030144738 Rogalski Jul 2003 A1
20030158605 Tournier Aug 2003 A1
20030163202 Lakin Aug 2003 A1
20030236572 Bertram, III Dec 2003 A1
20040002766 Hunter et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040039449 Tournier Feb 2004 A1
20040039451 Southworth Feb 2004 A1
20040059424 Guederian et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064187 Ball et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040064189 Maroney et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040064190 Ball et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040107002 Katsuya Jun 2004 A1
20040122519 Wiley et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122520 Lipman et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040167629 Geremakis et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167630 Rolston Aug 2004 A1
20040193168 Long et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193275 Long et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193276 Maroney et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193277 Long et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193278 Maroney et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199260 Pope Oct 2004 A1
20040220674 Pria Nov 2004 A1
20040230311 Cyprien et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040260398 Kelman Dec 2004 A1
20050043805 Chudik Feb 2005 A1
20050049709 Tornier Mar 2005 A1
20050065612 Winslow Mar 2005 A1
20050107882 Stone et al. May 2005 A1
20050119531 Sharratt Jun 2005 A1
20050177241 Angibaud et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050261775 Baum et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278030 Tornier et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060036328 Parrott et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060069443 Deffenbaugh et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069444 Deffenbaugh et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069445 Ondria et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060195194 Gunther Aug 2006 A1
20060200249 Beguin et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070038302 Shultz et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050042 Dietz et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055380 Berelsman et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070112433 Frederick et al. May 2007 A1
20070156246 Meswania Jul 2007 A1
20070179624 Stone Aug 2007 A1
20070225817 Ruebelt et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225818 Reubelt et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080021564 Gunther Jan 2008 A1
20080082175 Holovacs et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080177327 Malandain et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080234820 Felt et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080294268 Baum Nov 2008 A1
20090105837 LaFosse et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125113 Guederian et al. May 2009 A1
20090228112 Clark et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090287309 Walch et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100087876 Gunther Apr 2010 A1
20100087877 Gunther Apr 2010 A1
20100114326 Winslow et al. May 2010 A1
20100161066 Iannotti et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100217399 Groh Aug 2010 A1
20100249938 Gunther et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100274360 Gunther Oct 2010 A1
20110029089 Giuliani et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110106266 Schwyzer et al. May 2011 A1
20110112648 Gunther May 2011 A1
20110137424 Lappin et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110144758 Deffenbaugh Jun 2011 A1
20110276144 Wirth et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110313533 Gunther Dec 2011 A1
20120172996 Ries et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120209392 Angibuad et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120239156 De Wilde et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130060346 Collins Mar 2013 A1
20130090736 Katrana et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130150972 Iannotti Jun 2013 A1
20130166033 Gunther Jun 2013 A1
20130197651 McDaniel et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140025173 Cardon et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140107794 Deffenbaugh et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140253641 Furuya Sep 2014 A1
20140257499 Winslow et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277520 Chavarria et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150105861 Gunther et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150223941 Lang Aug 2015 A1
20150265411 Deransart et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160045323 Kovacs et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160302934 Chavarria Oct 2016 A1
20170000617 Ries et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170056187 Humphrey et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170071749 Lappin et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170202674 Gunther Jul 2017 A1
20170273806 Cardon et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170304063 Hatzidakis et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170360456 Gunther Dec 2017 A1
20180071104 Kovacs et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180078377 Gargac Mar 2018 A1
20180161169 Cardon et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180193150 Winslow et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180200067 Axelso, Jr. et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180243102 Burkhead, Jr. et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180368982 Ball Dec 2018 A1
20190336293 Kehres Nov 2019 A1
20200261209 Stchur Aug 2020 A1
20210038401 Ball et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210137692 Budge May 2021 A1
20210137693 Ball et al. May 2021 A1
20210236292 Chavarria Aug 2021 A1
20210244547 Gunther et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210251640 Gunther Aug 2021 A1
20210338446 Ball Nov 2021 A1
20220151795 Running et al. May 2022 A1
20220175543 Ball Jun 2022 A1
20220175544 Ball et al. Jun 2022 A1
20230078024 Gunther et al. Mar 2023 A1
20230080207 Gunther et al. Mar 2023 A1
20230081505 Gunther Mar 2023 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (36)
Number Date Country
4220217 Dec 1993 DE
10164328 Jul 2003 DE
0299889 Jan 1989 EP
0339530 Nov 1989 EP
0570816 Nov 1993 EP
1464305 Oct 2004 EP
14887646 Dec 2006 EP
1858453 Nov 2007 EP
1952788 Aug 2008 EP
2601912 Jun 2013 EP
2083759 Sep 2015 EP
2689750 Aug 2016 EP
3090705 Nov 2016 EP
3598957 Jan 2020 EP
2248820 May 1975 FR
2567019 Jan 1986 FR
2695313 Mar 1994 FR
2013-158909 Aug 2013 JP
2014-515651 Jul 2014 JP
WO 2006093763 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2008011078 Jan 2008 WO
WO 2009071940 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2011112425 Sep 2011 WO
WO-2013148437 Oct 2013 WO
WO 2012075183 Apr 2014 WO
WO 20140195909 Dec 2014 WO
WO-2014195909 Dec 2014 WO
WO 2018022227 Feb 2018 WO
WO-2018022227 Feb 2018 WO
WO 2018129286 Jul 2018 WO
WO 2018181420 Oct 2018 WO
WO-2019006205 Jan 2019 WO
WO 2019178104 Sep 2019 WO
WO 2019213073 Nov 2019 WO
WO-2020023975 Jan 2020 WO
WO 2020185893 Sep 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (27)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,341, filed Jan. 31, 2011, Gunther.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/088,976, filed Apr. 18, 2011, Gunther.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/701,118, filed Dec. 2, 2019, Gunther.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/870,666, filed Feb. 1, 2023, Ball et al.
Biomet, “Absolute™ Bi-Polar.” 2001 in 2 pages.
Biomet, “Copeland™ Humeral Resurfacing Head, Interlok®/HA Coated Implant Information,” 2003 in 1 page.
Biomet, “Copeland™ Humeral Resurfacing Head,” 2001 in 12 pages.
Biomet, “Copeland™ Humeral Resurfacing Head, Macrobond™ Implant Information,” 2003 in 1 page.
Biomet, “Copeland™ Humeral Resurfacing Head, Surgical Technique,” 2003 in 2 pages.
Boileau et al., “The Three-Dimensional Geometry of the Proximal Humerus. Implications for Surgical Technique and Prosthetic Design,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 79: 857-865, 1997.
Braun, et al., Modular Short-stem Prosthesis in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implant Positioning and the Influence of Navigation, Ortho SuperSite (Oct. 2007) in 8 pages.
Clavert et al. Glenoid resurfacing: what are the limits to asymmetric reaming for posterior erosion? J. Shoulder and Elbow Surg. Nov./Dec. 2007: 843-848.
Dalia Pria, Paolo. Slide presentation, entitled “Shoulder Prosthesis Design and Evolution”, to the Naples International Shoulder Congress in Italy (2000) in 55 pages.
DePuy, “Global C.A.P., Surgical Technique Resurfacing Humeral Head Implant,” 2004 in 23 pages.
Inset Mini-glenoid Brochure, Titan Modular Shoulder System Brochure, Ascension Orthopedics, 2011, 4 pages.
Karduna et al. Glenhumeral Joint Translations before and after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg. 79(8) (1997): 1166-1174.
Redacted letter from a third party dated Aug. 24, 2012 in 2 pages.
Levy et al., “Cementless Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Should. 5- to 10-year Results with the Copeland Mark-2 Prosthesis,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 83: 213-221, 2001.
Lima-Lto Medical Systems Glenoidi/Glenoids catalogue (2001) in 1 page.
Lima-Lto Miniglenoide Cementata document 7560.50.030 (1999) in 1 page.
Panisello, et al., Bone remodelling after total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented anatomic femoral stem: a three-year prospective study using bone densitometry, J Ortho Surg 14(1):32-37 (2006).
Ross, Mark and Duke, Phillip, “Early Experience in the Use of a New Glenoid Resurfacing Technique” Glenoid Presentation, SESA Nov. 4, 2006, Session 4/0800-0930 p. 93 in 1 page.
Tight Fit Tools, Right Angle Drill Attachment, Serial No. 00400 www.tightfittools.com/riganat.html in 1 page/downloaded Mar. 11, 2005.
TITAN(™) Modular Shoulder System Brochure, 2011, available at http://www.ascensionortho.com/Assets/PDF/TitanModular/TITANModularShoulder_Brochure-revD.pdf (2 pages).
Tournier et al., Enhancement of Glenoid Prosthesis Anchorage using Burying Technique. Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery 9(1)(2008): 35-42.
Wang et al., Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Glenoid Design in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J. Shoulder & Elbow Surgery (2005) 15: 129S-140S.
Statement of Grounds and Particulars of Opposition for Australian Patent Application No. 2006218936 dated Oct. 5, 2012 in 8 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230090753 A1 Mar 2023 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62816708 Mar 2019 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 17435333 US
Child 18058058 US