This relates generally to touch and hover sensing, and in particular, to improved capacitive touch and hover sensing.
Many types of input devices are presently available for performing operations in a computing system, such as buttons or keys, mice, trackballs, joysticks, touch sensor panels, touch screens and the like. Touch screens, in particular, are becoming increasingly popular because of their ease and versatility of operation as well as their declining price. Touch screens can include a transparent touch sensor panel positioned in front of a display device such as a liquid crystal display (LCD), or an integrated touch screen in which touch sensing circuitry is partially or fully integrated into a display, etc. Touch screens can allow a user to perform various functions by touching the touch screen using a finger, stylus or other object at a location that may be dictated by a user interface (UI) being displayed by the display device. In general, touch screens can recognize a touch event and the position of the touch event on the touch sensor panel, and the computing system can then interpret the touch event in accordance with the display appearing at the time of the touch event, and thereafter can perform one or more actions based on the touch event.
Mutual capacitance touch sensor panels can be formed from a matrix of drive and sense lines of a substantially transparent conductive material such as Indium Tin Oxide (ITO), often arranged in rows and columns in horizontal and vertical directions on a substantially transparent substrate. Drive signals can be transmitted through the drive lines, which can make it possible to measure the static mutual capacitance at the crossover points or adjacent areas (sensing pixels) of the drive lines and the sense lines. The static mutual capacitance, and any changes to the static mutual capacitance due to a touch event, can be determined from sense signals that can be generated in the sense lines due to the drive signals.
While some touch sensors can also detect a hover event, i.e., an object near but not touching the touch sensor, typical hover detection information may be of limited practical use due to, for example, limited hover detection range, inefficient gathering of hover information, etc.
This relates to improved capacitive touch and hover sensing. A capacitive sensor array can be driven with electrical signals, such as alternating current (AC) signals, to generate electric fields that extend outward from the sensor array through a touch surface to detect a touch on the touch surface or an object hovering over the touch surface of a touch screen device, for example. The electric field can also extend behind the sensor array in the opposite direction from the touch surface, which is typically an internal space of the touch screen device. An AC ground shield may be used to enhance the hover sensing capability of the sensor array. The AC ground shield can be positioned behind the sensor array and can be stimulated with signals having the same waveform as the signals driving the sensor array. As a result, the electric field extending outward from the sensor array can be concentrated. In this way, for example, the hover sensing capability of the sensor array may be improved.
Hover sensing may also be improved using methods to detect a hover position of an object outside of a space directly above the touch surface. In particular, the hover position and/or height of an object that is nearby, but not directly above, the touch surface (in other words, an object outside of the space directly above the touch surface), e.g., in the border area at the end of a touch screen, may be determined using measurements of sensors near the end of the touch screen by fitting the measurements to a model. Other improvements relate to the joint operation of touch and hover sensing, such as determining when and how to perform touch sensing, hover sensing, both touch and hover sensing, or neither.
The present disclosure, in accordance with one or more various embodiments, is described in detail with reference to the following figures. The drawings are provided for purposes of illustration only and merely depict example embodiments of the disclosure. These drawings are provided to facilitate the reader's understanding of the disclosure and should not be considered limiting of the breadth, scope, or applicability of the disclosure. It should be noted that for clarity and ease of illustration these drawings are not necessarily made to scale.
In the following description of embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which it is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments that can be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments can be used and structural changes can be made without departing from the scope of the disclosed embodiments.
This relates generally to touch and hover sensing, and more particularly, to improved capacitive touch and hover sensing. For example, an alternating current (AC) ground shield may be used to enhance the hover sensing capability of a sensor array, such as a capacitive touch sensor array. Electrical signals, such as AC signals, transmitted to a capacitive touch sensor array in a touch screen can generate electric fields that extend outward from the sensor array through a touch surface to detect a touch on the touch surface or an object hovering over the touch surface. The electric field can also extend behind the sensor array in the opposite direction from the touch surface, which is typically an internal space of the touch screen device. An AC ground shield can be positioned behind the sensor array, and the AC ground shield can be stimulated with signals having the same waveform as the AC signals, for example. As a result, the electric field extending outward from the sensor array can be concentrated, as described in more detail below. In this way, for example, the hover sensing capability of the sensor array may be improved.
Hover sensing may also be improved using methods to detect a hover position of an object outside of a space directly above the touch surface. In particular, the hover position and/or height of an object that is nearby, but not directly above, the touch surface (in other words, an object outside of the space directly above the touch surface), e.g., in the border area at the end of a touch screen, may be determined using measurements of sensors near the end of the touch screen by fitting the measurements to a model, as described in more detail below. Other improvements relate to the joint operation of touch and hover sensing, such as determining when and how to perform touch sensing, hover sensing, both touch and hover sensing, or neither, as described in more detail below.
Touch and hover sensing apparatus 100 also includes a touch and hover control system 107 that can drive sensor array 101 with electrical signals, e.g., AC signals, applied to horizontal lines 103 and/or vertical lines 105. The AC signals transmitted to sensor array 101 create electric fields extending from the sensor array, which can be used to detect objects near the sensor array. For example, an object placed in the electric field near sensor array 101 can cause a change in the self capacitance of the sensor array, which can be measured by various techniques. Touch and hover control system 107 can measure the self capacitance of each of the horizontal and vertical lines to detect touch events and hover events on or near sensor array 101.
The maximum range of detection can depend on a variety of factors, including the strength of the electric field generated by sensor array 101, which can depend on the voltage, i.e., amplitude, of the AC signals used for detection. However, the AC signal voltage may be limited by a variety of design factors, such as power limitations, impedance limitations, etc. In some applications, such as consumer electronics in general and portable electronics in particular, the limited maximum voltage of the AC signals may make it more difficult to design touch and hover sensing systems with acceptable detection ranges.
In this regard,
In addition, AC ground shield 201 can reduce or eliminate the electric field between sensor array 101 and AC ground shield 201. More particularly, even though the voltages on sensor array 101 and AC ground shield 201 may be changing over time, the change can be substantially in unison so that the voltage difference, i.e., electric potential, between the sensor array and the AC ground shield can remain zero or substantially zero. Therefore, little or no electric fields may be created between sensor array 101 and AC ground shield 201.
The configuration of AC ground shield 201 may also help to shield sensor array 101 from other electronics and/or sources of ground, such as from display circuitry 317 which can be driven by a display driver 319 to generate an image viewed through cover surface 305. In particular, as described above, AC ground shield 201 can help prevent or reduce an electric field emanating from sensor array 101 in the direction of the AC ground shield. In the configuration shown in
Another type of AC shield, a transmission line AC shield 308, is shown in
In typical algorithms used to determine position and/or hover height of an object directly above a sensor array of a touch screen, for example, a full set of measurements such as measurements 601 can provide enough data to determine the position from a determination of local maximum 607. In this case, the determination of local maximum 607 can be easily made because the set of measurements 601 spans local maximum 607. In other words, local maximum 607 can be within the range of measurements 601. On the other hand, measurements 603 represent only tail end 609 portion of a complete curve, which does not include direct information of a local maximum. Thus, while the shape of tail end 609 can be known, the shape of the complete curve that would be measured if sensor array 101 extended beyond distal end 303 can be unknown.
Various methods can be used to fit a Gaussian curve to measurements 603. For example, one method that may be used is a maximum likelihood estimate method. In this case, for example, parameters of a Gaussian curve, such as maximum height and standard deviation, may be adjusted until differences (errors) between the estimated Gaussian curve and measurements 603 are minimized. The Gaussian curve with the lowest estimated error can be used to determine unknown local maximum 613, which can represent the position of finger 401 outside of space 307.
In some embodiments, the model used may be another type of curve, for example a modified Gaussian curve, a custom curve determined from previous data, etc. In some embodiments, the model used may not be a curve at all, but may simply be a set of parameters stored in a lookup table (LUT). In this case, individual sensor measurements may be individually fit to the values stored in the lookup table, and once the best match is found, the lookup table can simply return a single value representing the determined hover position of the object. The hover position values in the lookup table can be based on, for example, empirical data of hover positions corresponding to particular sensor measurements, previously calculated curve modeling, etc.
In some embodiments, other parameters may be used in the determination of hover position and/or height. For example, if the object's size, conductivity, etc., are known, these parameters may be included when fitting the measured capacitances to the model. In some embodiments, a model can be based on a previous set of capacitance measurements of the object that includes a local maximum.
In some embodiments, information regarding object size, velocity, etc., may be taken into consideration in determining a model to be used in fitting the capacitance measurements. For example,
In some embodiments, other information about finger 401, such as the finger's velocity, may be used when fitting measurements 603. For example, the velocity of finger 401, which may be determined by a separate algorithm, may be used as a parameter in the model used during the fitting process. In this way, a curve or representation of measurements 601 may be tracked as finger 401 travels outside of space 307, such that information regarding the local maximum of the curve can be maintained even though the local maximum may not be directly detected in measurements 603.
In some embodiments, multiple models may be considered during fitting of the measurements. For example, the method may determine that more than one object is causing the particular capacitance measurements near a distal end of the sensor array, and the method may use more than one model and/or fitting method to attempt to fit the capacitance measurements to one or more objects and/or types of objects. For example, the method may determine that the capacitance measurements are caused by multiple objects of the same type, such as “three fingers”, or “two thumbs”, etc. The method may determine that the capacitance measurements are caused by objects of different types, such as “a finger and a thumb”, or “a first and a thumb”, etc. The method may determine that the capacitance measurements are caused by a variety of numbers and types of objects, such as “two fingers and a first”, or “a left thumb, a right finger, and a palm”, etc. The method may fit different models, corresponding to the different number and/or type of objects, to different portions of the capacitance measurements. For example, the method may determine that the capacitance measurements are caused by two objects, e.g., a finger that was previously tracked as it moved off of the sensor array and an unknown object estimated to be a thumb. In this case, the method may attempt to fit the capacitance measurements corresponding to the finger to previously stored data by fitting individual sensor measurements to previously stored values in a LUT and fit the capacitance measurements corresponding to the thumb to a Gaussian curve using a maximum likelihood estimate of parameters associated with a thumb. Thus, some embodiments may estimate the number of objects and the parameters of each object when fitting the capacitance measurements.
In some embodiments, the position and/or motion of an object near the distal end of a sensor array and outside of the space directly above the sensor array may be processed as a user input. For example, a position and/or motion of an object may be processed as an input to a graphical user interface (GUI) currently displayed, as an input independent of a GUI, etc.
For example, the method described with reference to
In some embodiments, a user input can be based on a combination of information including the position and/or motion of an object directly above the sensor array and the position and/or motion of an object near the distal end of the sensor array and outside of the space directly above the sensor array. Referring to
Other operations can be occurring during or in between the touch detection and hover detection phases. For example, display driver 319 may transmit image signals to display circuitry 317 in a display phase that can be in between the touch sensing phase and the hover sensing phase. During the touch and/or hover sensing phases, AC shield driving system 203 may operate as described above to shield transmission line 309 using transmission line AC shield 308, and to boost the electric field emanating from cover surface 305 using AC shield 201. The touch detection phase and hover detection phase may occur in any order.
Some embodiments may not be able to sense touch and hover concurrently, i.e., only a single mode of sensing (non-overlapping touch/hover sensing) is possible. In this case, in some embodiments touch sensing and hover sensing may be time multiplexed, that is, touch and hover sensing can be performed during different, non-overlapping periods of time. Various methods can be implemented for deciding how to time multiplex the sensing operations, i.e., deciding whether touch sensing or hover sensing (or neither) should be performed at a particular time.
In some embodiments, touch and hover sensing can operate concurrently, i.e., multi-mode sensing. Even if a system can perform multi-mode touch and hover sensing, it may be advantageous to perform single mode sensing in some cases. For example, if either touch sensing or hover sensing is not needed at a particular time, switching to single mode sensing to save power may be desirable.
In some embodiments, the operation of touch sensing and hover sensing can be determined by a fixed schedule. In other embodiments, the time and duration of touch and hover sensing can be varied dynamically, for example, by setting the system to operate in one of a number of operational modes including the touch sensing mode and the hover sensing mode, and possibly other modes, such as a display mode. For instance,
If a touch is not detected at 1102, the system can perform (1104) hover detection, and can determine (1105) whether a hover is detected. If a hover is detected, the system can perform (1103) both touch and hover sensing, because the hover may indicate a period of user activity. If a hover is not detected at 1105, the system can perform (1104) hover detection again. As long as a hover is not detected, the system may not need to perform touch detection, because any approaching object will cause a hover detection before the object can touch down on the sensing system.
Other factors may be used to determine whether to detect touch, hover, both or neither. For example, some embodiments may detect an approaching object during hover sensing and wait until the object gets close to the touch surface to perform touch sensing. In other words, a distance threshold can be used to activate touch sensing. In some embodiments, the touch/hover mode may be determined by a particular software application that may require, for example, touch data but not hover data. In some embodiments, the current number and/or position of touches may be used as a factor. For example, a small mobile touch screen device may alternate between touch sensing and hover sensing until a predetermined number of contacts, e.g., five, touch the touch surface. When five touch contacts are detected, the device can cease detecting hover and can detect only touch because a user is unlikely to use sixth object to perform a hover, for example.
Some embodiments may be capable of multi-mode operation, i.e., performing touch sensing and hover sensing concurrently. For example, some embodiments can use frequency multiplexing to combine AC signals used for touch sensing with different frequency AC signals used for hover sensing. In some embodiments, code division multiplexing of the AC signals can be used to perform concurrent touch sensing and hover sensing.
Frequency multiplexing and code division multiplexing can allow circuit elements, such as sensing electrodes, to be used to detect touch and hover concurrently. For example, an entire array of sensors may be simultaneously stimulated to detect touch and hover.
In some embodiments, touch sensing and hover sensing may be space multiplexed by, e.g., operating one portion of a sensor array for touch sensing and concurrently operating another portion of the sensor array for hover sensing. For example, an AC signal used for touch sensing can be transmitted to a first group of sensors of the sensor array, and an AC signal used for hover sensing can be transmitted to a second group of sensors of the array. The groups of sensors may be changed dynamically, such that touch and hover sensing can be performed by different portions of the sensor array at different times. For example, touch sensing can be activated for portions of the sensor array on which touches are detected, and the remaining sensors may be operated to detect hover. The system can track moving touch objects and adjust the group of sensors sensing touch to follow the moving object.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not by way of limitation. Likewise, the various diagrams may depict an example architectural or other configuration for the disclosure, which is done to aid in understanding the features and functionality that can be included in the disclosure. The disclosure is not restricted to the illustrated example architectures or configurations, but can be implemented using a variety of alternative architectures and configurations. Additionally, although the disclosure is described above in terms of various example embodiments and implementations, it should be understood that the various features and functionality described in one or more of the individual embodiments are not limited in their applicability to the particular embodiment with which they are described. They instead can be applied alone or in some combination, to one or more of the other embodiments of the disclosure, whether or not such embodiments are described, and whether or not such features are presented as being a part of a described embodiment. Thus the breadth and scope of the present disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described example embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4603231 | Reiffel et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
5402151 | Duwaer | Mar 1995 | A |
5483261 | Yasutake | Jan 1996 | A |
5488204 | Mead et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5825352 | Bisset et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835079 | Shieh | Nov 1998 | A |
5880411 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6137427 | Binstead | Oct 2000 | A |
6188391 | Seely et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6310610 | Beaton et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323846 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335642 | Hiroshima et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6650157 | Amick et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6690387 | Zimmerman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7015894 | Morohoshi | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7084643 | Howard et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7184064 | Zimmerman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7315793 | Jean | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7663607 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8149002 | Ossart et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8479122 | Hotelling et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8770033 | Roziere | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8913021 | Elias et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8933710 | Blondin et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9086768 | Elias et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20020121146 | Manaresi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040217945 | Miyamoto et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060026521 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060071913 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060097991 | Hotelling et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060197749 | Popovich | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060197753 | Hotelling | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070074913 | Geaghan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070109274 | Reynolds | May 2007 | A1 |
20070152977 | Ng et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080007533 | Hotelling | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080007543 | D'Souza | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012835 | Rimon et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080041639 | Westerman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042660 | Ely et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062148 | Hotelling et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080122798 | Koshiyama et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080143683 | Hotelling | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158174 | Land et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080174321 | Kang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080231292 | Ossart et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080309632 | Westerman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090009483 | Hotelling et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090045823 | Tasher et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090128515 | Bytheway | May 2009 | A1 |
20090167325 | Geaghan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174675 | Gillespie et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090219255 | Woolley et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234207 | Rantala | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090251439 | Westerman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090289914 | Cho | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090309851 | Bernstein | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100026656 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100105443 | Vaisanen | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110040 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100149126 | Futter | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100241956 | Matsuda et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253638 | Yousefpor et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100321333 | Oda et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328262 | Huang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110025629 | Grivna et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050585 | Hotelling et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063247 | Min | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110115729 | Kremin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110157069 | Zhuang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110234523 | Chang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110273395 | Chung | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273399 | Lee | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120007831 | Chang et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120013399 | Huang | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120043971 | Maharyta | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120050180 | King et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120050333 | Bernstein | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092288 | Wadia | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120162088 | Van Lieshout et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120176179 | Harders et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120182251 | Krah | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120187965 | Roziere | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188200 | Roziere | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130038863 | Fresquet | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130285971 | Elias et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285972 | Elias et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285973 | Elias et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130314109 | Kremin et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140085246 | Shahparnia | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140145732 | Blondin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140146006 | Luong | May 2014 | A1 |
20140267165 | Roziere | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140360854 | Roziere | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150145802 | Yao et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150324062 | Elias et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000-163031 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002-342033 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2008-117371 | May 2008 | JP |
WO-2005114369 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2005114369 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2008121411 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2009023880 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO-2009023880 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO-2011005977 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO-2012027086 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2013165925 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report mailed Apr. 20, 2011, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/041391, filed Jul. 8, 2010, six pages. |
Lee, S.K. et al. (Apr. 1985). “A Multi-Touch Three Dimensional Touch-Sensitive Tablet,” Proceedings of CHI: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 21-25. |
Rubine, D.H. (Dec. 1991). “The Automatic Recognition of Gestures,” CMU-CS-91-202, Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon University, 285 pages. |
Rubine, D.H. (May 1992). “Combining Gestures and Direct Manipulation,” CHI ' 92, pp. 659-660. |
Westerman, W. (Spring 1999). “Hand Tracking, Finger Identification, and Chordic Manipulation on a Multi-Touch Surface,” A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering, 364 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed Mar. 3, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,643, filed Sep. 30, 2010, 22 pages. |
Cypress. (Apr. 21, 2010). “Cypress's New Hover Detection for TrueTouch™ Touchscreen Solution Indicates Where a Finger Will Touch as It Approaches Screen,” Press Release by Cypress Semiconductor Corp., located at <http://www.cypress.com/?rID=42779>, last visited Sep. 28, 2010, two pages. |
Final Office Action mailed Aug. 19, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,643, filed Sep. 30, 2010, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,620, filed Apr. 30, 2012, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed Oct. 14, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,652, filed Apr. 30, 2012, 16 pages. |
International Search Report mailed Aug. 22, 2012, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/046814, filed Aug. 5, 2011, three pages. |
International Search Report mailed Dec. 17, 2013, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/038706, filed Apr. 29, 2013, eight pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 29, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,643, filed Sep. 30, 2010, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,645, filed Apr. 30, 2012, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,620, filed Apr. 30, 2012, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,652, filed Apr. 30, 2012, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 15, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,643, filed Sep. 30, 2010, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 15, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,645, filed Apr. 30, 2012, seven pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 6, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,643, filed Sep. 30, 2010, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed mailed Mar. 16, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,620, filed Apr. 30, 2012, seven pages. |
European Search Report mailed Jul. 20, 2015, for EP Application No. 15162455.8, three pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed May 19, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/089,418, filed Nov. 25, 2013, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 13, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,652, filed Apr. 30, 2012, seven pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 5, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,620, filed Apr. 30, 2012, eight pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110007021 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |