Computer systems typically employ a display or multiple displays which are mounted on a support stand and/or are incorporated into some other component of the computer system. For displays employing touch sensitive technology (e.g., touch screens), it is often desirable for a user to interact directly with such displays in order to fully utilize such touch technology during system operations. However, optimum ergonomic placement of a display for simply viewing an image thereon is often at odds with such placement for engaging in touch interaction therewith. Thus, users desiring to use a single computer system for both traditional viewing applications as well as touch interactive application often encounter difficulties in positioning and/or utilizing such systems.
For a detailed description of various examples, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular system components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, computer companies may refer to a component by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function. In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . .” Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct electrical or mechanical connection, through an indirect electrical or mechanical connection via other devices and connections, through an optical electrical connection, or through a wireless electrical connection. As used herein the term “approximately” means plus or minus 10%. In addition, as used herein, the phrase “user input device” refers to any suitable device for providing an input, by a user, into an electrical system such as, for example, a mouse, keyboard, a hand (or any finger thereof), a stylus, a pointing device, etc.
The following discussion is directed to various examples of the disclosure. Although one or more of these examples may be preferred, the examples disclosed should not be interpreted, or otherwise used, as limiting the scope of the disclosure, including the claims. In addition, one skilled in the art will understand that the following description has broad application, and the discussion of any example is meant only to be descriptive of that example, and not intended to intimate that the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, is limited to that example.
Referring now to
Referring still to
Upright member 140 includes a first or upper end 140a, a second or lower end 140b opposite the upper end 140a, a first or front side 140c extending between the ends 140a, 140b, and a second or rear side 140d opposite the front side 140c and also extending between the ends 140a, 140b. The lower end 140b of member 140 is coupled to the rear end 120b of base 120, such that member 140 extends substantially upward from the support surface 15.
Top 160 includes a first or proximate end 160a, a second or distal end 160b opposite the proximate end 160a, a top surface 160c extending between the ends 160a, 160b, and a bottom surface 160d opposite the top surface 160c and also extending between the ends 160a, 160b. Proximate end 160a of top 160 is coupled to upper end 140a of upright member 140 such that distal end 160b extends outward therefrom. As a result, in the example shown in
Referring still to
During operation, mat 200 is aligned with base 120 of structure 110, as previously described to ensure proper alignment thereof. In particular, in this example, rear side 200b of mat 200 is placed between the raised portion 122 of base 120 and support surface 15 such that rear end 200b is aligned with front side 120a of base, thereby ensuring proper overall alignment of mat 200, and particularly surface 202, with other components within system 100. In some examples, mat 200 is aligned with device 150 such that the center line 155 of device 150 is substantially aligned with center line 205 of mat 200; however, other alignments are possible. In addition, as will be described in more detail below, in at least some examples surface 202 of mat 200 and device 150 are electrically coupled to one another such that user inputs received by surface 202 are communicated to device 150. Any suitable wireless or wired electrical coupling or connection may be used between surface 202 and device 150 such as, for example, WI-FI, BLUETOOTH®, ultrasonic, electrical cables, electrical leads, electrical spring-loaded pogo pins with magnetic holding force, or some combination thereof, while still complying with the principles disclosed herein. In this example, exposed electrical contacts disposed on rear side 200b of mat 200 engage with corresponding electrical pogo-pin leads within portion 122 of base 120 to transfer signals between device 150 and surface 202 during operation. In addition, in this example, the electrical contacts are held together by adjacent magnets located in the clearance between portion 122 of base 120 and surface 15, previously described, to magnetically attract and hold (e.g., mechanically) a corresponding ferrous and/or magnetic material disposed along rear side 200b of mat 200.
Referring specifically now to
Thus, referring briefly to
Projector assembly 184 is generally disposed within cavity 183 of housing 182, and includes a first or upper end 184a, a second or lower end 184b opposite the upper end 184a. Upper end 184a is proximate upper end 182a of housing 182 while lower end 184b is proximate lower end 182b of housing 182. Projector assembly 184 may comprise any suitable digital light projector assembly for receiving data from a computing device (e.g., device 150) and projecting an image or images (e.g., out of upper end 184a) that correspond with that input data. For example, in some implementations, projector assembly 184 comprises a digital light processing (DLP) projector or a liquid crystal on silicon (LCoS) projector which are advantageously compact and power efficient projection engines capable of multiple display resolutions and sizes, such as, for example, standard XGA (1024×768) resolution 4:3 aspect ratio or standard WXGA (1280×800) resolution 16:10 aspect ratio. Projector assembly 184 is further electrically coupled to device 150 in order to receive data therefrom for producing light and images from end 184a during operation. Projector assembly 184 may be electrically coupled to device 150 through any suitable type of electrical coupling while still complying with the principles disclosed herein. For example, in some implementations, assembly 184 is electrically coupled to device 150 through an electric conductor, WI-FI, BLUETOOTH®, an optical connection, an ultrasonic connection, or some combination thereof. In this example, device 150 is electrically coupled to assembly 184 through electrical leads or conductors (previously described) that are disposed within mounting member 186 such that when device 150 is suspended from structure 110 through member 186, the electrical leads disposed within member 186 contact corresponding leads or conductors disposed on device 150.
Referring still to
Sensor bundle 164 includes a plurality of sensors and/or cameras to measure and/or detect various parameters occurring on or near mat 200 during operation. For example, in the specific implementation depicted in
Referring now to
In some examples, device 150 directs assembly 184 to project an image onto surface 202 of mat 200. In addition, device 150 may also display an image on the display 152 (which may or may not be the same as the image projected onto surface 202 by assembly 184). The image projected by assembly 184 may comprise information and/or images produced by software executing within device 150. A user (not shown) may then interact with the image displayed on surface 202 and display 152 by physically engaging the touch sensitive surface 202 of mat 200. Such interaction may take place through any suitable method such as, direct interaction with a user's hand 35, through a stylus 25, or other suitable user input device(s).
In some examples, both space 188 and space 168 coincide or correspond with surface 202 of mat 200, previously described, to effectively integrate the functionality of the touch sensitive surface 202, projector assembly 184, and sensor bundle 164 within a defined area. Referring to
Although the computer system 100 may be delivered to a user with factory calibrated settings, misalignment of various components of the system 100 may occur due to various reasons, such as a loose connection, mechanical conditions, or user interaction. As an example, changes in temperature may cause components of the system 100, such as the touch sensitive surface 202 of the mat 200, to thermally expand or contract, resulting in potential misalignment with respect to other components of the system 100 (e.g., the projector assembly 184 and/or the sensor bundle 164).
Misalignment of one or more components of the system 100 may affect the integrated functionality of the touch sensitive surface 202, projector assembly 184, and sensor bundle 164 within a defined area (e.g., the surface 202). For example, sensors of the sensor bundle 164 may inadvertently change positions with respect to the touch sensitive surface 202 and/or the projector assembly 184, positioning of the surface 202 may inadvertently change with respect to the sensor bundle 164 and/or the projector assembly 184, or both the sensor bundle 164 and the surface 202 may inadvertently change positions with respect to the projector assembly 184.
Referring to
Examples disclosed herein provide the ability to align components of the computer system 100 in order to effectively integrate the functionality of the touch sensitive surface 202, projector assembly 184, and sensor bundle 164 within a defined area. Alignment between at least the projector assembly 184 and the touch sensitive surface 202 may ensure that interactions between assembly 184 and the surface 202 are correctly correlated.
Although the computer system 100 may be delivered to a user with factory calibrated settings, the system 100 may include a program for verifying alignment of the components within the system 100 with respect to each other. The program may be initiated by software executing within the device 150. As an example, the program may verify whether the touch sensitive mat 200 is properly aligned with respect to other components, and whether the sensor bundle 164 is calibrated properly with respect to the projector assembly 184, as will be further described. As an example, the verification program may be executed regularly (e.g., once a week), at power up of the system 100, or upon a reconnection of the mat 200. If misalignment of components within the system 100 are detected, calibration operations may be performed.
As an example, alignment of the components within the system 100, at least between the projector assembly 184 and the touch sensitive surface 202, may be verified by detecting corners of the touch sensitive surface 202 and corners of the projector display space 188, and determining any correspondence between the two sets of corners, based according to mapping methods, such as homography. As an example, vector offsets may be generated between the two sets of corners in order to determine any correspondence. Based upon the differences detected between the two sets of corners, calibration operations (e.g., automatic and/or manual) may be performed on one or more components of the system 100, as will be further described. As an example, the corners or the touch sensitive surface 202 may be reversely mapped to the corners of the projector display space 188 for estimating a realigning homography between the projector assembly 184 and the touch sensitive mat 200.
As an example, in order to accurately detect the four corners of the touch sensitive surface 202, the mat 200 may be designed such that a spectral reflectance characteristic of the touch sensitive surface 202 may be different from a spectral reflectance characteristic of a border of the mat 200 surrounding a perimeter of the touch sensitive surface 202. For example, the touch sensitive surface 202 and the border of the mat 200 may each reflect different frequencies (e.g., due to the different spectral reflectance characteristics) as detected by sensors from the sensor bundle 164. Examples of the spectral reflectance characteristic include materials that reflect various wavelengths, such as ultraviolet, visible light, and infrared. As an example, the different spectral reflectance characteristics may correspond various colors or IR coatings. The different spectral reflectance characteristics may serve as fiducial objects in order to detect the four corners of the touch sensitive surface 202.
The difference in the spectral reflectance characteristic may be slight but with a sufficient contrast ratio for sensors from the sensor bundle 164 to be able to differentiate the first spectral reflectance characteristic of the touch sensitive surface 202 from the second spectral reflectance characteristic of the border of the mat 200. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to the detection of the corners 902a-d of the touch sensitive surface 202, camera 164b may be used to take either a still image or a video of the whole mat 200, or at least relevant portions of the mat 200. A histogram of the image/video may provide regions of interest, generally providing an indication of the difference in color intensity between the color of the touch sensitive surface 202 (e.g., color 702) and the color of the border of the mat 200 surrounding a perimeter of the surface 202 (e.g., color 704). Histogram equalization may be performed on the regions of interest to obtain high and low thresholds for an edge detection algorithm (e.g., Canny edge detection). Upon running the edge detection algorithm, edge points indicating the perimeter of the touch sensitive surface 202 may be extracted (e.g., edge points for all four sides of the surface 202). A line fitting algorithm may be used for determining four fitted lines, which may be representative of the perimeter of the touch sensitive surface 202. Intersection of two lines from the four fitted lines may be used for calculating each corner 902a-d. When the still image of the mat 200 is captured by the color camera 164b, the corners 902a-d of the touch sensitive surface 202 may be determined even if one or more of the corners is occluded by an object in the still image (e.g., an object resting on the mat 200). This may be made possible due to the other portions of the mat 200 that is captured in the still image that represents the difference in color intensities between the two regions.
A similar corner detection may be performed for detecting corners 904a-d of the projector display space 188. For example, sensors from the sensor bundle 164 may be used for differentiating a color intensity of the projector display space 188 from a color intensity of an area outside the space 188. Upon detecting the corners 902a-d of the touch sensitive surface 202 and the corners 904a-d of the projector display space 188, correspondence between the two sets of corners may be determined, based according to mapping methods, such as homography. As an example, based upon the correspondence between the two sets of corners, the projector 184 may adjust settings for the border of the image reflected on to the mat 200 (e.g., border of the projector display space 188) to fit within the detected border of the mat 200 (e.g., the touch sensitive surface 202).
As an example, the corners 902a-d of the touch sensitive surface 202 may be reversely mapped to the corners 904a-d of the projector display space 188 for realigning mapping between the projector assembly 184 and the touch sensitive mat 200 (e.g., via homography). As an example, vector offsets may be generated between the two sets of corners in order to determine any correspondence. Based upon the differences detected between the two sets of corners, calibration operations may be performed (e.g., automatic and/or manual) on one or more components of the system 100. If the misalignment between the two sets of corners is above an acceptability tolerance, the system 100 may inform the user to disconnect and reconnect the mat 200 by aligning the mat 200 with the base 120 of structure 110, as previously described to ensure proper alignment thereof. However, if the misalignment between the two sets of corners (e.g., 902a-d and 904a-d) is below an acceptability tolerance, but above a usability tolerance, the system 100 may automatically recalibrate in order for the border of the projector display space 188 to coincide with the border of the touch sensitive surface 202. As an example, the automatic recalibration may occur adjusting firmware settings of the project 184.
When using the color camera 164b to capture a still image of the mat 200 for detecting the corners 902a-d of the touch sensitive surface 202, the camera 164b may also capture objects in the background or surrounding the mat 200. These background objects may affect the ability to differentiate between the color intensities of colors 702 and 704. For example, a background object may be confused for a portion of the mat 200. As an example, the mat 200 may include an IR-absorbing coating that serves as a fiducial object for detection of the mat by a sensor from the sensor bundle 164 (e.g., IR camera or depth sensor 164c). The IR-absorbing coating may be robustly detected by the IR camera. As a result, the mat 200, as detected by the IR camera, may be distinct compared to other objects under the IR camera (e.g., from the objects in the background or surrounding the mat 200). After the positioning of the mat 200 has been properly detected via the IR camera, the color camera 164 may be used as described above to capture a still image of the mat 200 according to the positioning determined by the IR camera. As an example, at least the border of the touch sensitive mat 200 may include the IR-absorbing coating as the fiducial object for detection of the border of the mat 200 by the IR camera.
Although the use of different colors are described with reference to
Referring to
Computing device 150 may include at least one processing resource. In examples described herein, a processing resource may include, for example, one processor or multiple processors included in a single computing device or distributed across multiple computing devices. As used herein, a “processor” may be at least one of a central processing unit (CPU), a semiconductor-based microprocessor, a graphics processing unit (GPU), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) configured to retrieve and execute instructions, other electronic circuitry suitable for the retrieval and execution instructions stored on a machine-readable storage medium, or a combination thereof.
As used herein, a “machine-readable storage medium” may be any electronic, magnetic, optical, or other physical storage apparatus to contain or store information such as executable instructions, data, and the like. For example, any machine-readable storage medium described herein may be any of a storage drive (e.g., a hard drive), flash memory, Random Access Memory (RAM), any type of storage disc (e.g., a compact disc, a DVD, etc.), and the like, or a combination thereof. Further, any machine-readable storage medium described herein may be non-transitory.
In the example of
At 1105, one or more sensors from the sensor bundle 164 may detect a border of a touch sensitive mat, wherein the mat includes a surface area of a first spectral reflectance characteristic on to which a projector is to project content, and the border of a second spectral reflectance characteristic different from the first spectral reflectance characteristic surrounding a perimeter of the surface area. As an example, the sensor(s) may detect the border of the mat by differentiating the second spectral reflectance characteristic of the border from the first spectral reflectance characteristic of the surface area. At 1110, one or more sensors from the sensor bundle 164 may detect a border of the content displayed on to the mat. At 1115, the computing system 100 may adjust projector settings for the border of the content displayed on to the mat to fit within the detected border of the mat.
Although the flowchart of
In the manner described, through use of examples of a computer system 100 in accordance with the principles disclosed herein, an additional touch sensitive display may be projected onto a touch sensitive surface (e.g., surface 202) to provide dual screen capability for a computing device (e.g., device 150).
While device 150 has been described as an all-in-one computer, it should be appreciated that in other examples, device 150 may further employ the use of more traditional user input devices such as, for example, a keyboard and a mouse. In addition, while sensors 164a, 164b, 164c, 164d within bundle 164 have been described as each representing a single sensor or camera, it should be appreciated that each of the sensors 164a, 164b, 164c, 164d may each include multiple sensors or cameras while still complying with the principles described herein. Further, while top 160 has been described herein as a cantilevered top, it should be appreciated that in other examples, top 160 may be supported at more than one point and is thus may not be cantilevered while still complying with the principles disclosed herein.
The above discussion is meant to be illustrative of the principles and various embodiments of the present invention. Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/014328 | 1/31/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/116220 | 8/6/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5890787 | McNelley et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
7023536 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038846 | Mandella et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7088440 | Buermann et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110100 | Buermann et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113270 | Buermann et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7161664 | Buermann et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7203384 | Carl et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7252387 | Raskar | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7268956 | Mandella et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7355593 | Hill | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7432917 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474809 | Carl et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7729515 | Mandella et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7826641 | Mandella et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7961909 | Mandella et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
9746966 | Suzuki | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20050078092 | Clapper | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050168437 | Carl et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060007170 | Wilson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060158617 | Hu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080018591 | Pittel et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080088593 | Smoot | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100805 | Majumder | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121442 | De Boer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080175000 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192017 | Hildebrandt et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090096895 | Benezra | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090128499 | Izadi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090251585 | Joseph | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100103330 | Morrison | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100234094 | Gagner | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110227915 | Mandella et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242054 | Tsu | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120038549 | Mandella et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120236038 | Cudak et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130077236 | Becze et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082953 | Yoshizawa | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130121601 | Yu | May 2013 | A1 |
20130194418 | Gonzalez-Banos | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130300637 | Smits et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130336525 | Kurtz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140292647 | Murase | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1701603 | Nov 2005 | CN |
1934459 | Mar 2007 | CN |
101091137 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101625619 | Jan 2010 | CN |
101916175 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102257424 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102306065 | Jan 2012 | CN |
103106648 | May 2013 | CN |
103414861 | Nov 2013 | CN |
103500438 | Jan 2014 | CN |
1608160 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1811360 | Jul 2007 | EP |
2499635 | Aug 2013 | GB |
2503749 | Jan 2014 | GB |
2005070944 | Mar 2017 | JP |
200404245 | Mar 2004 | TW |
201113786 | Apr 2011 | TW |
201237717 | Sep 2012 | TW |
WO-0147259 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO-2007139189 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2012064520 | May 2012 | WO |
WO-2013019190 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO-2013019255 | Feb 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
D. Cotting et al., “Towards a Continuous, Unified Calibration of Projectors and Cameras,” May 14, 2004, pp. 1-36. |
Gao, Rui et al; Microsoft Research-Mobile Surface; Microsoft Research; 2010; http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/mobilesurface/ ˜ 1 page. |
Han Chen et al., “Scalable Alignment of Large-Format Multi-Projector Displays Using Camera Homography Trees,” IEEE Visualization 2002, pp. 339-346, IEEE. |
Hand, Randall: Infinite, Z Launches zSpace Virtual Holographic 3D Displaly for Designers; VizWorld.com; Dec. 13, 2011; http://www.vizworld.com/ ˜ 2 pages. |
Harrison, Chris et al; OmniTouch: Wearable Multitouch Interaction Everywhere; USIT'11; Oct. 16, 2011; http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/ ˜ 10 pages. |
Harrison:, et al; Bringing Toys To Life: Intel Labs OASIS Project; Augmented Engineering; Jan. 26, 2011; http://augmentedengineering.wordpress.com/ ˜ 1 page. |
Hartmann: Bjorn et al; Pictionaire: Supporting Collaborative Design Work by Integrating Physical and Digital Artifacts; CSCW 2010; http://research.microsoft.com/en-us ˜ 4 pages. |
Hinckley, Ken et al; Pen + Touch = New Tools; UIST'10; http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/˜ 10 pages. |
Izadi et al., “C-Slate: A Multi-Touch and Object Recognition System for Remote Collaboration using Horizontal Surfaces,” IEEE Int'l Workshop on HIHCS, 2007, pp. 3-10. |
Junuzovic, Sasa et al; Microsoft Research-IllumiShare; Microsoft Research; 2012; http://delivery.acm.org/ ˜ 2 pages. |
Kane, Shaun K. et al; Bonfire: A Nomadic System for Hybrid Laptop-Tabletop Interaction; UIST'09; http://dub.washington.edu/ ˜ 10 pages. |
Linder, Natan et al; LuminAR: Portable Robotic Augmented Reality Interface Design and Prototype; UIST'10, 03; http://fluid.media.mit.edu/ ˜ 2 pages. |
Melanson, Donald; Microsoft Research Working on Portable Surface; Mar. 2, 2010; http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/02 ˜ 2 pages. |
Melanson, Donald; Wiimote Repurposed For Multi-Point Interactive Whiteboard; Dec. 10, 2007; http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/ ˜ 2 pages. |
Simonite, Tom; A Kitchen Countertop With A Brain; MIT Technology Review; Jul. 2, 2010; http://www.technologyreview.com/news/ ˜ 2 pages. |
Wilson, Andrew D. et al; Combining Multiple Depth Cameras and Projectors for Interactions On, Above, and Between Surfaces.; USTI'10; Oct. 3, 2010; 10 pages. |
Wilson, Andrew D.; Using A Depth Camera As A Touch Sensor; ITS 2010: Devices & Algorithms; http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/ ˜ 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160334938 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |