The present invention relates to a method of controlling the blade of a towed scraper pulled by a towing vehicle, such as a tractor.
With a tractor drawn scraper the depth of cut of the scraper is manually controlled by an operator as the machine traverses the ground. To obtain maximum operating efficiency, experienced operators will feather the depth of cut to prevent clutching, tractor stall or wheel slip during use. It is often difficult for an operator to properly adjust blade position or depth at the start of a scraping operation. These tasks require an operator with considerable experience and skill and a high level of concentration to operate at an acceptable level of productivity and performance. It would be desirable to have a control system which, at the start of a towed scraper operation, can automatically, quickly and accurately move the scraper blade to its proper desired working depth.
Accordingly, an object of this invention is to provide a method of automatically lowering the blade of a towed scraper to a working position.
A further object of the invention is to provide such a method which, at the start of a towed scraper operation, will quickly and accurately move the scraper blade to its proper desired working depth.
These and other objects are achieved by the present invention, wherein a control system automatically moves the blade of a towed scraper to a desired working position. The control system includes a position sensor which provides a signal proportional to the position of the scraper cutting edge relative to the scraper chassis, and a draft sensor which provides a signal proportional to the draft load exerted by the scraper on the tractor drawbar. An electronic controller receives the sensor signals, operator commands, and various signals from the tractor system. The electronic controller stores blade position setpoints, monitors the operator controls, and monitors various parameters, such as the engine rpm, transmission gear, ground speed, etc. The electronic controller moves the scraper blade to preset positions, and automatically moves the blade from a pre-dig position to a working or digging position as a scraping operation is begun under a desired method.
The method includes sensing the ground speed of the vehicle, sensing a draft force applied by the scraper to the vehicle, and with the vehicle pulling the scraper at a target measurable ground speed with the blade positioned above the surface of the ground, automatically lowering the blade with respect to the front frame at a first rate until the blade begins to engage the surface of the ground. Thereafter, while the vehicle continues to move forward at near the target ground speed, the blade is lowered at a second rate and for a duration related to the sensed ground speed so that lowering of the blade stops when the scraper wheels begin to enter the cut produced by the blade. With the blade position fixed, the scraper is moved forward at near the target ground speed for a distance determined as a function of the sensed draft force. Thereafter, the blade is raised until the position of the blade relative to the front frame matches the position of the blade relative to the front frame at the end of the first lowering step.
Referring to
The gate 22 and the blade 20 are raised and lowered by blade lift cylinders 26. A blade position sensor 28 on the scraper 10 senses the position or angle of the blade 20 with respect to the front frame 11. A draft force sensor 40 is preferably mounted on a upper surface of the conventional tractor drawbar 16. The draft force sensor 40 is preferably a strain gauge type force sensor with a T-rosette configuration, similar to a Series 460 bolt-on strain gauge which is commercially available from Datum Electronics Limited. Alternatively, the draft force sensor could be mounted in an appropriate location on the scraper tongue 14.
As best seen in
Referring now to
The ECU 50 is preferably programmed to perform the automatic blade lowering method illustrated by
Referring to
Before this method is performed, the following steps are performed by an operator while the scraper 10 and tractor 12 are stationary. First, button 66 is pressed so that future inputs of the blade position signal P from sensor 30 and buttons 68 and 70 will be associated with and stored in connection with the operation of SCV 44. Then lever 72 is move back to a rearward position, thus raising the blade 20 to a desired raised position, whereupon upper set point button 68 is pressed to cause the ECU 50 to store the current signal from position sensor 30 as an upper position set point value, at or near position 80 of
Lever 72 is then manipulated to cause SCV 44 to retract cylinder 26 and lower the blade 20 to a position just above and not engaging the surface of the ground, whereupon button 70 is pressed to store the current position from sensor 30 as a prepare to dig position set point value, corresponding to position 7 of
Lever 72 is then manipulated to cause SCV 44 to lower the blade 20 slightly into the ground, and lever 72 is moved fully forward to its float position. Button 70 is then pressed to cause the ECU to store a working position set point value Pw 81. Lever 72 is then moved full back to the detented position and released and the ECU 50 will raise the blade to its upper set point position, at or near position 80 of
Next, the tractor transmission (not shown) is placed in a working speed gear and the throttle (not shown) is moved fully forward so that the tractor 12 will move forward at the desired working speed.
Lever 72 is then pushed forward to its detent position and released. The ECU is programmed to automatically lower the blade 20 to the previously stored prepare to dig position (84 of
Referring to
Thereafter, while the scraper 10 continues to move forward at near the target ground speed, the blade 20 is lowered at a second rate (with respect to frame 11) and for a duration related to the sensed ground speed so that lowering of the blade 20 stops when the scraper wheel 18 begins to enter the cut produced by the blade 20 traveling through the ground (step 108). The ECU 50 determines this by integrating the ground speed to obtain the distance traveled and comparing the distance traveled to the stored distance between the blade 20 and the wheels 18. The second lowering rate is preferably slower than the first lowering rate. When the wheels 18 begin to enter the cut, lowering of the blade 20 is stopped as the scraper 10 continues to move forward, whereupon the position of the blade 20 relative to frame 11 is represented by position 88 of
With the blade 20 fixed with respect to the scraper frame 11, the scraper 10 is pulled forward at the desired ground speed (step 110) while the sensed draft force is monitored and compared to a stored draft force level which is a predetermined percentage of the draft force parameter set by the operator with knob 74. The draft force will be increasing because the blade 20 will be moving downward with respect to the surface of the ground (but fixed with respect to front frame 11).
When the sensed draft force increases to this stored draft force level (position 90 of
The scraper 10 is thereafter continued to be pulled forward by the tractor 12 at the desired working speed while the position of the blade 20 remains fixed with respect to scraper frame 11. The position of the blade 20 may be thereafter controlled in a closed loop manner in response to sensed draft force, engine speed and other parameters as is well known in the implement draft control field.
A similar blade lowering method could be applicable in a tandem towed scraper arrangement (not shown) where two scrapers are towed, one behind the other. Normally, when the front scraper is filled, its blade is lifted and the rear scraper blade then-continues the same cut as its blade reaches the end of the cut made by the front scraper. In the case of the rear scraper, the lowering of its blade at the second rate would be delayed until the blade of the rear scraper engages the ramp of soil left at the point where the blade of the front scraper was lifted.
While the present invention has been described in conjunction with a specific embodiment, it is understood that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, this invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations which fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4031964 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4173258 | Boulais et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4299290 | Nunes, Jr. | Nov 1981 | A |
5235511 | Middleton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5560431 | Stratton | Oct 1996 | A |
5685377 | Arstein et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6125561 | Shull | Oct 2000 | A |
6269885 | Barber et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
7284346 | Miskin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20060219417 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070181318 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |