The present invention relates to an apparatus for use in hydrocarbon cracking. The apparatus is specifically intended for use in assisting in the removal of coke and the prevention of coke build up in high coking units that are used for hydrocarbon cracking.
Refining of petroleum products to produce gasoline and other olefinic products can result in some of the processing units producing significant secondary byproducts, most notably carbonatious deposits or coke. In particular, fired tubular furnace reactors utilizing process reactor tubes, such as resid hydrotreaters, atmospheric towers, vacuum towers, FCC main fractionators, coker main fractionators, and the like form deposits of coke byproducts on the inside of the reactors and on the process tubes of the reactors. The coke deposits inhibit effective heat transfer, thereby resulting in inefficient processes.
For instance, atmospheric towers used with resid hydrotreaters have a typical operating cycle which includes declining capacity through the third year and ultimate shutdown of the atmospheric tower due to coke formations and large pieces of coke plugging the outlet lines for the tower bottoms. Management of the coke is critical to efficiency and, ultimately, the turnaround cycle of the atmospheric tower.
Therefore, it is an object of the invention to more easily remove coke formed in the reactor units, thereby allowing the reactor unit to run more efficiently for a longer period of time.
Another object of the invention is to prevent large pieces of coke from clogging the outlet lines for the tower bottoms.
Another object of the present invention is to catch and remove large pieces of coke spalling off the interior components of the reactor unit.
The objects of the invention are readily realized by the following apparatus.
The coke catcher of the present invention is basically a grid device or colander-like device that is positioned within the reactor unit to catch large pieces of coke that spall off the walls of the unit. The apparatus is specifically designed to pass smaller pieces of coke through to the pump suction baskets while retaining the larger pieces of coke within the unit. The internal coke catcher installed in the reactor unit protects the unit outlet piping from becoming clogged with large pieces of spalled coke. The large pieces of spalled coke sometimes occur due to thermal cycling from an unplanned shutdown. The present invention is intended to reduce the frequency of unintended shutdowns and increase the predictability in length of time between planned turnarounds of the reactor unit.
The coke catcher prevents large pieces of coke from entering the outlet lines upstream of the bottoms pump suction screens. The bottoms pumps have two suction screens per pump that are designed to prevent coke from reaching the bottoms pump. The coke catcher prevents the larger pieces of coke from collecting in the outlet piping in the section upstream of the suction screens and restricting the outlet line flow of bottoms through the outlet line. The larger pieces of coke are particularly problematic because they cannot be flushed to the pump suction screens where they can be removed. The piping layout from the towers to the screens includes a series of bends that inhibits movement of large pieces of coke through the piping.
The grid spacing of the coke catcher is sized to be larger than the pump suction basket screens to allow coke which can be managed by the baskets to pass through to the screens while retaining larger coke materials in the reactor unit.
The apparatus also includes a vaulted chimney hat to keep coke from settling on top of the apparatus.
The present invention creates a tubular colander shaped coke catcher which allows smaller pieces of coke and liquid to flow into the bottom outlet nozzle of the reactor unit, while retaining larger pieces of coke inside the reactor unit. Over time, the larger pieces of coke will sometimes break up and exit the reactor. Otherwise they are removed during a planned shutdown.
The present invention is shown by schematic in
The coke catcher is preferably made up of four units A, B, C and D, which can be easily disassembled to assist in removing the coke catcher from the interior of the atmospheric tower to allow for cleaning of the coke catcher. Section A of the coke catcher includes the bottom (16). Sections B and C provide a colander-like grid for screening the coke particles. Preferably, the bar spacing of the grid is a minimum of four inches to prevent coke buildup on the bars. Sections B, C and D are held together by clamp members (22) which allow for sections B, C and D to be separated from one another for easy maintenance. Section D is the top hat portion of the coke catcher which prevents coke from settling on top of the coke catcher. The gap between the top hat and the top of section C is, preferably, a minimum of twelve inches to avoid coke spreading and potential plugging. As the coke spalls off the walls of the atmospheric tower, it enters the coke catcher through the colander sections B and C and through the hat supports (18). The coke catcher is supported within the atmospheric tower by support bars (20).
During the last turnaround of a Resid Hydrotreater Unit (RHU), the coke catcher of the present invention was installed in the atmospheric tower. The historic record of the atmospheric tower of this particular RHU typically had the third year of its cycle as the most challenging. For instance, as illustrated in
An additional benefit to the installation of the coke catcher is the ability to better recover from unplanned unit shutdowns from process.
One indicator of atmospheric tower bottoms fouling is the temperature difference between feed zone and bottom product temperatures. An increase in this delta temperature suggests increased coke growth in the tower and bottoms circuit. An increase in delta temperatures is indicative of increased thermal cycling in the tower. Such thermal cycling of the tower can cause coke in the vessel to spall off and be flushed out. If the coke catcher were not installed the coke would have plugged the outlet line completely. A tower NCE turnaround would have been needed before restarting the unit. The NCE turnaround was unnecessary, resulting in a more efficient and rapid startup of the unit.
The above detailed description of the present invention is given for explanatory purposes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be construed in an illustrative and not a limitative sense, the scope of the invention being defined solely by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation, and claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 16/946,584, filed Jun. 29, 2020, titled “TOWER BOTTOMS COKE CATCHING DEVICE,” which is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 16/124,322, filed Sep. 7, 2018, titled “TOWER BOTTOMS COKE CATCHING DEVICE,” now U.S. Pat. No. 10,696,906, issued Jun. 30, 2020, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/565,227, filed Sep. 29, 2017, titled “TOWER BOTTOMS COKE CATCHING DEVICE,” the full disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3771638 | Schneider | Nov 1973 | A |
4764347 | Milligan | Aug 1988 | A |
5258117 | Kolstad et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
8647415 | De Haan et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
10696906 | Cantley et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20080207974 | McCoy et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20120125813 | Bridges et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20140024873 | De Haan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150071028 | Glanville | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20190100702 | Cantley et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Philip Lopiccolo, Coke trap reduces FCC slurry exchanger fouling for Texas refiner, Journal, Sep. 8, 2003. |
Daryl W. Hanson et al., An atmospheric crude tower revamp, Article, Jul. 2005. |
Niaei et al., Computational Study of the Pyrolysis Reactions and Coke Deposition in Industrial Naphtha Cracking, P.M.A. Sloot et al. (Eds.): ICCS 2002, LNCS 2329, pp. 723-732 (Year: 2002). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220064542 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62565227 | Sep 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16946584 | Jun 2020 | US |
Child | 17523776 | US | |
Parent | 16124322 | Sep 2018 | US |
Child | 16946584 | US |