The present invention relates generally to toy flying aircraft, and, more particularly, to toy flying aircraft, preferably those styled after science fiction spaceships, that can be flown unpowered as gliders or powered, with or without remote control, for an extended period of time due to their unique structure.
Toy flying aircraft are generally known. Consumers today desire relatively inexpensive toy flying aircrafts that have structure that mimics the appearance of a life-size realistic or fanciful aircraft. Furthermore, consumers today desire toy flying aircraft having structure that allows the aircraft to stay airborne or fly for an extended period of time. Unfortunately, it can be difficult to create a toy flying aircraft that successfully combines the above-identified features for a variety of reasons.
Therefore, it would be desirable to create a toy flying aircraft that can be flown for an extended period of time, either unpowered as a glider or powered by remote control, for example, that mimics the appearance of a life-size realistic or fanciful aircraft. Specifically, it would be desirable to create a toy flying aircraft out of generally planar semi-rigid stock material that is modeled after the fictional and imaginary star ships “Enterprise” created for the Star Trek science fiction television series and movies and that is capable of staying airborne for an extended period of time due to its unique structural features.
Briefly stated, the present invention is a toy flying aircraft that includes a fuselage having a central vertical longitudinal plane. The fuselage has an upper part forming a front portion thereof and a lower part forming a rear portion thereof. The front portion and rear portion being coupled by a vertical support angling generally forward and upward from a front upper side of the rear portion to a lower rear side of the front portion. A generally circular wing in the form of an at least generally horizontally planar disk intersecting the front portion of the fuselage. The central vertical longitudinal plane bisecting the wing into two generally equal halves and a geometric center of the wing being generally fixedly connected to and supported by the front portion of the fuselage. One diameter of the wing being defined as extending through the geometric center thereof and generally perpendicularly to the central vertical longitudinal plane. The one diameter bisecting the wing into a first portion and a second portion. The first portion of the wing being forward of the one diameter and defining an upper horizontal plane generally perpendicular to the central vertical longitudinal plane. The second portion of the wing being rearward of the one diameter and downwardly offset from the upper horizontal plane defining a lift surface. A generally V-shaped rear stabilizer bisected and supported by the rear portion of the fuselage so as to locate the rear stabilizer at least substantially behind the wing and vertically entirely below the upper horizontal plane.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings several embodiments which are presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
In the drawings:
Certain terminology is used in the following description for convenience only and is not limiting. The words “right,” “left,” “upper,” and “lower” designate directions in the drawings to which reference is made. The words “first” and “second” designate an order of operations in the drawings to which reference is made, but do not limit these steps to the exact order described. The words “inwardly” and “outwardly” refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the aircraft and designated parts thereof. Additionally, the term “a,” as used in the specification, means “at least one.” The terminology include the words above specifically mentioned, derivatives thereof, and words of similar import. Finally, the words “horizontal” and “planar” are relative as opposed to absolute terms.
Referring to the drawings in detail, wherein like numerals indicate like elements throughout, there is shown in
Preferably, the aircraft 10 is two-dimensional (“2D”) or “flat” in the sense that each of its main body components is built and/or formed of generally planar, relatively thin foam sheet or similarly thin and planar stock material of at least generally uniform thinness. The main body components of the aircraft 10 are at least generally, but not necessarily exactly flat, giving the components a two-dimensional appearance. The material employed is preferably sufficiently rigid to maintain its general form, yet resiliently flexible to provide the angularity described. Moreover, depending upon the material selected, it can be bent to a permanent extent by appropriate manufacturing techniques for the materials selected (e.g. heat and pressure with or without moisture) or forced into the angularity described by stops/bracketry/bracing or both. For example, the aircraft 10 may formed a ¼ or 3/16 inch thick polystyrene foam sheet stock, but could be built from balsa or other foam(s) or laminated plastic(s) or other similarly relatively rigid yet light weight material. Alternatively, the aircraft 10 may be given for a more three-dimensional (“3D”) appearance. More particularly, the aircraft 10 may be built from shaped foam block material (not shown), for example, may use a planar frame that is covered on each of its major structures with preferably shaped retaining, non-porous, thin, sheet polymer material, for example ten millimeter thick polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”) sheet to present a more 3D representation of the aircraft (also not shown).
Referring to
Referring again to
In the preferred embodiment, the wing 30 preferably is made of planar sheet stock material and includes a generally horizontally planar first or top surface 30a, an opposing generally horizontally planar second or bottom surface 30b, and an outer circumferential edge 30c that extends around an entire perimeter of the wing 30 generally perpendicular to and extending between the top and bottom surfaces 30a, 30b. The central vertical longitudinal plane V preferably bisects the wing 30 into two generally equal halves h1, h2. A geometric center of the wing 30 is preferably generally fixedly connected to and supported by the front portion 22 of the fuselage 20. The wing 30 thus intersects the front portion 22 of the fuselage 20 and preferably runs the entire length of the front portion. The circular wing 30 can further be shaped with a slight bend to form a dihedral angle suggestedly about ten degrees or less (i.e. 160 degrees top surface h1 to top surface h2) for greater roll stability. Also, a dihedral angle is provided along at least a majority of the length of the wing 30 and suggestedly at least from the intersection of the wing 30 with the fuselage 20 and rearward. The wing 30 preferably has a dihedral bend of about five degrees (i.e. about 175° from top surface of h1 to top surface of h2) in the first portion 32 increasing to about ten degrees (i.e. about 170° from top surface of h1 to top surface of h2) at the rear end of the rear portion 34.
In the preferred embodiment, the one diameter 19 of the wing 30 in particular is defined as extending through the geometric center thereof and perpendicular to the central vertical longitudinal plane V. Preferably, a Center of Gravity (C.G.) of the aircraft 10 is located along or proximal to the one diameter 19, which extends across a widest part of the wing 30. The one diameter 19 of the wing 30 bisects the wing 30 into the first or front portion 32 and the second or rear portion 34. The front portion 32 of the wing 30 is located forward of the one diameter 19 and defines an upper horizontal plane HP (see
As mentioned above, lift is generated, at least in part, by flexing the wing 30 downwardly along at least part of its length. More particularly, the rear portion 34 of the wing 30, which is located rearward of the one diameter 19, preferably defines a plane P (see
Preferably, the front portion 32 of the wing 30 is generally solid and/or unitary until it intersects a portion of the fuselage 20 approximately at or above a downwardly extending chin-like protrusion 23 of the front portion 22 thereof. From this intersection rearward, as mentioned above, the rear portion 34 of the wing 30 is preferably split so as to extend along the lateral sides of the front portion 22 of the fuselage 20 and is angled downwardly towards the rear of the aircraft 10 so as to create downward facing lift surfaces 38a, 38b by presenting a positive angle of attack to the airflow. At least one stop 29 is preferably located on each side surface of the fuselage 20 to generally maintain the generally angled position of the second portion 34 of the wing 30. Specifically, rear ends of the lift surfaces 38a, 38b may be retained in their flexed position by the stop(s) 29 or other suitable means that are connected directly to the fuselage 30.
There are at least two differences between
As seen in
As seen in
Referring to
Preferably, each motor 52 and propeller 53 is located proximate one of the two slots 36, such that at least a portion of each propeller 53 extends through at least a portion of one of the slots 36 during operation thereof. Thus, in operation, a portion of each propeller 53 rotates into and within each slot 36. The motors 52 may be fixedly attached to the top surface 30a of the wing 30 as seen in
In the preferred embodiment, the propulsion and control system 50 further includes a power supply (not shown), such as rechargeable or disposable batteries or, more preferably, rechargeable capacitor(s) operatively connected to the motors 52. Specifically, the aircraft 10 is controlled by a controller (not shown), which, in this embodiment, is located together with the power supply in a housing 54 either fixedly attached to or embedded within the wing 30 forward of the fuselage 20. The central vertical longitudinal plane V preferably generally bisects the housing 54 to generally maintain an equal balance of weight on each side of the central vertical longitudinal plane V. For remote control, the system 50 preferably includes a wireless signal receiver or antenna 58 and processing circuitry (not shown) sufficient to at least independently control rotational speed of the motors 52 for differential thrust vectoring directional control. It will be appreciated that the aircraft 10 may be operated without differential thrust vectoring for uncontrolled powered flight.
Referring again to
In the preferred embodiment, the central vertical longitudinal plane V preferably bisects the rear stabilizer 40 and pair of struts 42. Each strut 42 extends laterally outwardly from the fuselage 20 and preferably upwardly and rearwardly with respect to the fuselage 20, terminating with the nacelles 44. The struts 42 and nacelles 44 stabilize the aircraft 10 both horizontally (yaw) and vertically (pitch).
Preferably, the pair of struts 42 and/or nacelles 44, or at least forward ends thereof, are neutrally angled or angled a predetermined degree downwardly, with respect to the upper horizontal plane HP forming the front portion 32 of the wing 30, as they extend forwardly so as to present a negative angle of attack to promote downward movement of the rear portion 24 of the fuselage 20 and increase the angle of attack of the wing 30 during flight. The struts 42 are flexed upwardly as they extend outwardly from the fuselage 20 at a dihedral angle of less than thirty degrees (i.e., more than 120° from top surface to top surface), suggestedly about twenty-five degrees or less (i.e. about 130° or more top surface to top surface as in
More information about various aspects of flying toy aircraft, particularly twin engine control, are found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,275,973 and, particularly those constructed of foam sheet material like the present invention, are further found in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0259595 A1, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
The surface decorations depicted in originally filed
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof. For example, the motors 52, propellers 53 and housing 54 with controller and power supply can be deleted and the remainder of aircraft 10 used as a glider even with slots 36. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but it is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/130,621, filed on May 30, 2008 and entitled “Toy Flying Trek Aircraft,” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1728937 | Kemp | Sep 1929 | A |
1771257 | Ingram | Jul 1930 | A |
2157448 | Back | May 1939 | A |
2347561 | Howard et al. | Apr 1944 | A |
2354453 | Gazda | Jul 1944 | A |
2361929 | DeFlorez | Nov 1944 | A |
3092060 | Reid | Jun 1963 | A |
3118411 | Koriagin | Jan 1964 | A |
3190582 | Lippisch | Jun 1965 | A |
3244246 | Walter | Apr 1966 | A |
3261575 | Gorton | Jul 1966 | A |
3369319 | Brown | Feb 1968 | A |
3392935 | Allmand | Jul 1968 | A |
3645474 | Arbuse | Feb 1972 | A |
3949519 | Meyer | Apr 1976 | A |
3957230 | Boucher et al. | May 1976 | A |
4103454 | Stone | Aug 1978 | A |
4106232 | Higgins | Aug 1978 | A |
4206411 | Meyer | Jun 1980 | A |
4253897 | Pistone | Mar 1981 | A |
4624425 | Austin et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4848700 | Lockheed | Jul 1989 | A |
4899954 | Pruszenski, Jr. | Feb 1990 | A |
D307923 | Probert | May 1990 | S |
5035382 | Lissaman et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5046979 | Ragan et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5050817 | Miller | Sep 1991 | A |
5065833 | Matsuoka et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5078638 | Molina | Jan 1992 | A |
5082204 | Croston | Jan 1992 | A |
5087000 | Suto | Feb 1992 | A |
5178088 | Howard | Jan 1993 | A |
5242132 | Wukowitz | Sep 1993 | A |
5269249 | Micheletti | Dec 1993 | A |
5357894 | Jacobson | Oct 1994 | A |
5562061 | Crocker | Oct 1996 | A |
5634839 | Dixon | Jun 1997 | A |
5727495 | Reslein | Mar 1998 | A |
5758844 | Cummings | Jun 1998 | A |
5853312 | Li | Dec 1998 | A |
6014940 | Jacobson | Jan 2000 | A |
6113028 | Lohse et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131848 | Crow | Oct 2000 | A |
6158540 | Rice et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164591 | Descatha | Dec 2000 | A |
6217404 | Liao | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6257946 | Yang | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6435932 | Lynn | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450852 | Arredondo | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478650 | Tsai | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517026 | Smith | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6568980 | Barthold | May 2003 | B2 |
6592073 | Meekins | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6612893 | Rehkemper et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6679753 | Motosko | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6732672 | Shin et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6824093 | Haseloh et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6912967 | Oats et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7073750 | Choi | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7275973 | Ong | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20020106961 | Barthold | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030040247 | Rehkemper et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030136873 | Churchman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040195438 | Chamberlain | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050233672 | Shantz | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060144995 | Clancy | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070259595 | Amireh et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080014827 | Amireh et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2004045735 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2007090156 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090305599 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61130621 | May 2008 | US |