Tracheobronchial implantable medical device and methods of use

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9173733
  • Patent Number
    9,173,733
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 21, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 3, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
Devices and methods for treating a diseased tracheobronchial region in a mammal. The device can be a stent which can include a sustained-release material such as a polymer matrix with a treatment agent. The stent can be bioabsorbable and a treatment agent can be incorporated therewith. A treatment method can be delivery of a stent to a tracheobronchial region by a delivery device such as a catheter assembly.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

Bioabsorbable implantable medical devices for the treatment of lesions caused by cancer of the tracheobronchial tree or cancer of the head, neck or chest.


BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

This invention relates generally to radially expandable endoprostheses which are adapted to be implanted in a physiological lumen. An “endoprosthesis” corresponds to an artificial device that is placed inside of a physiological lumen. A “lumen” refers to a cavity of a tubular organ such as a blood vessel or other physiological passageway. A stent, or implantable medical device, is an example of an endoprosthesis. Stents are generally cylindrically shaped devices which function to hold open or expand a physiological lumen, or to compress a lesion. A stent must be able to satisfy a number of mechanical requirements. For example, the stent must be capable of withstanding the structural loads, namely radial compressive forces, imposed on the stent as it supports the walls of the tubular organ. Accordingly, a stent must possess adequate radial strength.


In adults, primary cancer of the tracheobronchial tree or cancer of the head, neck or chest that extends into the tracheobronchial tree frequently causes lumen compromise and airway obstruction. “Tracheobronchial” refers to the physiological passageway from the throat to the lungs. In some methods of treatment, a compromised component of the tracheobronchial tree can be removed by laser treatment, mechanical debulking, electrocautery, brachytherapy, photodynamic therapy or cryotherapy. A stent can then be placed at the treatment site following removal of a comprised component to maintain the airway lumen to counteract collapse or edema.


Alternatively, a stent can be placed to help compress any lesion extending into the tracheo or bronchi without the need for removal of the compromised component. In some methods of treatment, a stent has been used to palliate patients with inoperable bronchogenic cancer, primary tracheal tumors and metastatic malignancies.


Stents which have been used in the tracheobronchial tree include metal, silicone and bioabsorbable stents. Metallic stents are generally made from an inert metal such as stainless steel, cobalt chromium and Nitinol. Some problems associated with known stent types delivered to the tracheobronchial region include inflammation, stent migration, epithelial damage, granulation tissue formation and mucous plugging. In addition, it is believed that known bioabsorbable stents designed for placement in the tracheobronchial region are not able to adequately combat inflammation caused by stent placement.


“Stent migration” refers to the gradual movement of the stent down the tracheobronchial tree after placement thereof. Stent migration of silicone stents in the tracheobronchial tree is common. “Mucous plugging” is an excessive production of mucous produced in response to the stent. Mucous plugging can cause interference with breathing. “Granulation tissue formation” is the formation of new tissue in response to a wound or other disruption of tissue. Excessive granulation tissue formation can cause a stent to be permanently lodged within a passageway complicating removal if required. Metal stents are especially susceptible to granulation tissue formation. Accordingly, a tracheobronchial stent which addresses these problems is desirable.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

Devices and methods for treating a diseased tracheobronchial region in a mammal are herein disclosed. The device can be a stent which can include a sustained-release material such as a polymer matrix with a treatment agent. The stent can be a bioabsorbable stent and a treatment agent can be incorporated therewith. A treatment method can be delivery of a stent to a tracheobronchial region by a delivery device such as a catheter assembly.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a side view of an embodiment of a stent of the present invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates a side view of an alternative embodiment of a stent of the present invention.



FIG. 3A illustrates side view of a first alternative embodiment of a stent of the present invention.



FIG. 3B illustrates side view of a second alternative embodiment of a stent of the present invention.



FIG. 3C illustrates an embodiment of a braided stent with variable radial strength.



FIG. 3D illustrates an embodiment of a coiled stent with variable radial strength.



FIG. 4A illustrates an elevational view, partially in section, of a delivery system having a covered stent on a catheter balloon which may be used pursuant to methods of the present invention.



FIG. 4B is a cross-section of the delivery system of FIG. 4A taken at line 2-2.



FIG. 4C is a cross-section of the delivery system of FIG. 4B taken at line 3-3.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of devices and methods for treating a diseased tracheobronchial region in a mammal, including, but not limited to, humans, are herein disclosed. In some embodiments, the device can be an implantable medical device such as a stent. Representative examples of implantable medical devices include, but are not limited to, self-expandable stents, balloon-expandable stents, micro-depot or micro-channel stents and grafts. In some embodiments, a treatment method can be delivery of a stent to a tracheobronchial region by a delivery device such as a catheter assembly.


In some treatment applications, a stent may only be required to be present in the tracheobronchial region for a limited period of time. To accommodate this, a stent can be made of a biodegradable, bioerodable or bioabsorbable polymer, hereinafter used interchangeably. A stent can also be made of a biostable or biodurable (hereinafter used interchangeably) or a combination of a biostable and biodegradable polymer. A stent made from a biodegradable polymer is intended to remain in the body for a duration of time until its intended function of, for example, maintaining luminal patency and/or drug delivery, is accomplished. After the process of degradation, erosion, absorption and/or resorption has been completed, none or substantially none of the biodegradable portion of the stent will remain in the tracheobronchial region.


In some embodiments, the stent may include a treatment agent. As used herein, treatment agents are intended to include, but are not intended to be limited to, drugs, biologically active agents, chemically active agents, therapeutic agents, and the like, and pharmaceutical compositions thereof, which can be used to deliver a treatment agent to a treatment site as described herein. Representative treatment agents include, but are not limited to, an anti-inflammatory, an anti-platelet, an anti-coagulant, a fibrinolytic, an anti-thrombonic, an anti-mitotic, an anti-biotic, an anti-allergic, an anti-oxidant, an anti-proliferative and an anti-migratory. The treatment agent may be incorporated within the body of the stent or within a polymer-based coating applied on or within the stent.


Tracheobronchial Stents



FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a stent. Stent 100 is generally tubular and includes a lumen 102 with an abluminal surface 104 and a luminal surface 106. Stent 100 can include a plurality of struts 108 connected by linking struts 110 with interstitial spaces 112 located therebetween. The plurality of struts 108 can be configured in an annular fashion in discrete “rows” such that they form a series of “rings” throughout the body of stent 100. Thus, stent 100 can include a proximal ring 114, i.e., proximal concentric end region, distal ring 116, i.e., distal concentric end region, and at least one central ring 118, i.e., middle concentric region. In some embodiments, proximal ring 114 and distal ring 116 can have a larger outer diameter than that of central rings 118. For example, the outer diameter (OD) of central rings 118 can be from about 3.5 mm to about 25 mm, and in some embodiments, from about 8 to about 20 mm. The OD of proximal ring 114 and distal ring 116 can be from about 5.0 mm to about 30 mm, and in some embodiments, from about 10 to about 22 mm. Such configuration may reduce or eliminate stent migration.



FIG. 2 illustrates an alternative embodiment of a stent. Stent 200 is generally tubular and includes a lumen 202 with an abluminal surface 204 and a luminal surface 206. Stent 200 can include a series of filaments 208 which can be interconnected in a braided, twisted or coiled fashion. Filaments 208 may be fabricated from a biodurable or biodegradable metal or polymer. Tubular stent 200 can include a proximal end 214, a distal end 216 and at least one central portion 218. In some embodiments, proximal end 214 and distal end 216 can have a larger outer diameter than that of central portion 218 similar to those ranges given with respect to FIG. 1. Stent 200 can be a self-expanding stent.



FIG. 3A illustrates another alternative embodiment of a stent. Stent 300 is generally tubular and includes a lumen 302 with an abluminal surface 304 and a luminal surface 306. Stent 300 can include a series of filaments 308 which can be interconnected in a braided, twisted, weaved or coiled fashion. Filaments 308 may be fabricated from a biodurable or biodegradable metal or polymer. Tubular stent 300 can include a proximal end 314, a distal end 316 and at least one central portion 318. In some embodiments, proximal end 314 and distal end 316 can have a larger outer diameter than that of central portion 318 similar to those ranges given with respect to FIG. 1. Stent 300 can be a self-expanding stent.



FIG. 3B illustrates another alternative embodiment of a stent. Stent 301 is generally tubular and includes a lumen 303 with an abluminal surface 305 and a luminal surface 307. Stent 301 can include a series of filaments 309 which can be interconnected in a braided, twisted, weaved or coiled. Filaments 309 may be fabricated from a biodurable or biodegradable metal or polymer. Tubular stent 301 can include a proximal end 315, a distal end 317 and at least one central portion 319 similar to those ranges given with respect to FIG. 1. In some embodiments, proximal end 315 and distal end 317 can have a larger outer diameter than that of central portion 319. Stent 301 can be a self-expanding stent.


In some embodiments, a stent according to the present invention can have variable radial strength along the stent length. For example, the stent can have higher radial strength at the proximal and distal ends relative to the central portions. In this aspect, the higher radial strength proximal and distal ends can serve as “anchors” after placement in the tracheobronchial tree. It is anticipated that higher radial strength proximal and distal ends can substantially minimize, or even prevent, stent migration.



FIG. 3C illustrates an embodiment of a braided stent with variable radial strength. Stent 320 includes proximal end 322, distal end 324 and at least one central portion 326. Proximal end 322 and distal end 324 can have higher picks per inch, or pitch (hereinafter referred to interchangeably), which can give ends 322 and 324 higher radial strength relative to central portion 326. “Pitch” is the density of material in a given unit of length. In some embodiments, a thin polymer fiber can be extruded, drawn and heat set to the dimensions ranging from about 0.003 inches to about 0.010 inches. The fibers can be wound onto a bobbin or spool and braided into a stent using a braiding machine. Braiding machines for stent fabrication are generally known by those skilled in the art. The pitch for central portion 326 of stent 320 can be predetermined by using the appropriate gear dimension in the braiding machine in the braiding machine to produce a predetermined picks per inch. Once central portion of stent 320 has been braided, the gear dimension in the braiding machine can be changed to accommodate fabrication of higher picks per inch of proximal end 322 and distal end 324. In some embodiments, central portion 326 can have a pitch of about 40 to about 90 picks per inch while ends 322 and 324 can have a pitch from about 60 to about 100 picks per inch. In any case, the proximal and distal ends will have higher picks per inch as compared to the central portion. In some embodiments, ends 322 and 324 can be from about 1.0 mm to about 5.0 mm. After braiding, stent 320 can be heat set. For example, in braided stents comprised of poly-L-lactic acid, heat setting can be done at between about 120° C. to about 160° C. for about 10 to about 30 minutes.



FIG. 3D illustrates an embodiment of a coiled stent with variable radial strength. Stent 321 includes proximal end 323, distal end 325 and at least one central portion 327. Proximal end 323 and distal end 325 can have a higher pitch angle, which can give ends 323 and 325 higher radial strength relative to central portion 327. “Pitch angle” is defined as the angle between the direction of the fiber and longitudinal axis. In some embodiments, a thin polymer fiber can be extruded, drawn and heat set to the dimensions ranging from about 0.003 inches to about 0.010 inches. The fiber can be coiled onto a mandrel with a predetermined pitch angle for central portion 327. Proximal end 323 and distal end 325 can be constructed using a higher pitch angle to increase radial strength. In some embodiments, central portion 327 can have a pitch angle of about 25° to about 70°, while ends 323 and 325 can have a pitch angle from about 50° to about 90°. In any case, the pitch angle at the proximal and distal ends will be higher than the central portion for increased radial strength. In some embodiments, ends 323 and 325 can be from about 1.0 mm to about 10.0 mm. After coiling, stent 321 can be heat set. For example, in coiled stents comprised of poly-L-lactic acid, heat setting can be done at between about 120° C. to about 160° C. for about 10 to about 30 minutes.


In general, a stent is designed so that the stent can be radially compressed (crimped) and radially expanded (to allow deployment). The stresses involved during compression and expansion are generally distributed throughout various structural elements of the stent. As a stent deforms, various portions of the stent can deform to accomplish radial expansion. In this aspect, the stent must be sufficiently malleable to withstand compression and expansion.


On the other hand, the stent must exhibit a certain degree of rigidity to maintain lumen patency during its lifetime. For a bioabsorbable stent, a lifetime can be from about 2 months to about 24 months depending on the intended application. Thus, a biodegradable stent is preferably fabricated from a polymer which allows for sufficient malleability during compression and expansion, and sufficient rigidity after deployment thereof.


Representative examples of polymers that may be used to manufacture or coat a stent, include but are not limited to, poly(N-acetylglucosamine) (Chitin), Chitosan, poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(lactide-co-glycolide), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate), polyorthoester, polyanhydride, poly(glycolic acid), poly(glycolide), poly(L-lactic acid), poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactic), poly(caprolactone), poly(trimethylene carbonate), polyester amide, poly(glycolic acid-co-trimethylene carbonate), co-poly(ether-esters) (e.g. PEO/PLA), polyphosphazenes, biomolecules (such as fibrin, fibrinogen, cellulose, starch, collagen and hyaluronic acid), polyurethanes, silicones, polyesters, polyolefins, polyisobutylene and ethylene-alphaolefin copolymers, acrylic polymers and copolymers other than polyacrylates, vinyl halide polymers and copolymers (such as polyvinyl chloride), polyvinyl ethers (such as polyvinyl methyl ether), polyvinylidene halides (such as polyvinylidene chloride), polyacrylonitrile, polyvinyl ketones, polyvinyl aromatics (such as polystyrene), polyvinyl esters (such as polyvinyl acetate), acrylonitrile styrene copolymers, ABS resins, polyamides (such as Nylon 66 and polycaprolactam), polycarbonates, polyoxymethylenes, polyimides, polyethers, polyurethanes, rayon, rayon-tracetate, cellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose butyrate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellophane, cellulose nitrate, cellulose propionate, cellulose ethers, and carboxymethyl cellulose. Another type of polymer based on poly(lactic acid) that can be used includes graft copolymers, and block copolymers, such as AB block-copolymers (“diblock-copolymers”) or ABA block-copolymers (“triblock-copolymers”), or mixtures thereof.


Additional representative examples of polymers that may be especially well suited for use in manufacturing or coating stents include ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (e.g., EVOH or EVAL), poly(butyl methacrylate), poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexfluorapropene (e.g., SOLEF 21508, available from Solvay Solexis PVDF, Thorofare, N.J.), polyvinylidene fluoride (e.g., KYNAR, available from ATOFINA Chemicals, Philadelphia, Pa.), ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers and polyethylene glycol.


Manufacturing processes for forming a bioabsorbable stent include, but are not limited to, casting, molding, extrusion, drawing or combinations thereof. Casting involves pouring a liquid polymeric composition into a mold. Molding processes include, but are not limited to, compression molding, extrusion molding, injection molding and foam molding. In compressing molding, solid polymeric materials are added to a mold and pressure and heat are applied until the polymeric material conforms to the mold. In extrusion molding, solid polymeric materials are added to a continuous melt that is forced through a die and cooled to a solid form. In injection molding, solid polymeric materials are added to a heated cylinder, softened and forced into a mold under pressure to create a solid form. In foam molding, blowing agents are used to expand and mold solid polymeric materials into a desired form, and the solid polymeric materials can be expanded to a volume in a range from about 2 to about 50 times their original volume. In the above-described molding embodiments, the solid form may require additional processing to obtain the final product in a desired form. Additional processing may include fiber processing methods such as hot drawing to induce orientation and higher crystallinity for increased mechanical strength.


The material for the stent can also be produced from known man-made fiber processing methods such as dry spinning, wet spinning, and melt spinning. In dry spinning, a polymer solution in warm solvent is forced through a tiny hole into warm air. The solvent evaporates into the air and the liquid stream solidifies into a continuous filament. Wet spinning method involves a polymer solution forced through tiny holes into another solution where it is coagulated into a continuous filament. Melt spinning method is a method in which a solid polymer is melted and forced through a tiny hole into cool air which solidifies the fiber into a continuous filament.


In some embodiments, a stent may be fabricated from a biocompatible metal or metal alloy. Representative examples include, but are not limited to, stainless steel (316L or 300), MP35N, MP2ON, Nitinol, Egiloy, tantalum, tantalum alloy, cobalt-chromium alloy, nickel-titanium alloy, platinum, iridium, platinum-iridium alloy, gold, magnesium or combinations thereof. MP35N and MP2ON are trade names for alloys of cobalt, nickel, chromium and molybdenum available from Standard Press Steel Co., Jenkintown, Pa. MP35N consists of 35 percent (%), cobalt, 35% nickel, 20% chromium and 10% molybdenum. MP2ON consists of 50% cobalt, 20% nickel, 20% chromium and 10% molybdenum.


In some embodiments, a treatment agent may be directly incorporated into the body of a bioabsorbable stent during the manufacturing process. For example, a treatment agent may be combined with a polymer matrix and subsequently subjected to any of the above-described manufacturing process for formation thereof. In this aspect, the treatment agent may be released in a controlled manner as the bioabsorbable stent naturally degrades in the tracheobronchial region.


In some applications, a polymer coating comprising at least one layer including a treatment agent can be applied to a surface of a stent for controlled release of the treatment agent. The polymer can be a polymer which exhibits a sustained-release characteristic of the treatment agent. For example, the polymer can be polyglycolide (PGA) which has a degradation rate of about 9 months to about 12 months. In another example, the polymer can be polylactide (PLA) which has a degradation rate of about 14 and about 18 months. Copolymers of PLA and PGA can also be used to tailor degradation rates. It should be appreciated that more than one coating may be applied to treat a variety of symptoms typically experienced with tracheobronchial stent placement.


For example, a coating can include one or a combination of the following types of layers: (a) a treatment agent layer, which may include a polymer and a treatment agent, or alternatively, a polymer-free treatment agent; (b) an optional primer layer, which may improve adhesion of subsequent layers on the stent or on a previously formed layer; (c) an optional topcoat layer, which may serve to control the rate of release of the treatment agent; and (d) an optional biocompatible finishing layer, which may improve the biocompatibility of the coating.


In some embodiments, the coating can be partially or completely applied to an abluminal surface or a luminal surface of the stent. The coating can be applied by methods known by those skilled in the art, including, but not limited to, dipping, spraying, pouring, brushing, spin-coating, roller coating, meniscus coating, powder coating, drop-on-demand coating, sputtering, gas-phase polymerization, solvent inversion or any combination thereof. Coating techniques are known by those skilled in the art.


The coating which includes a treatment agent can include, but is not limited to, an anti-inflammatory, an anti-platelet, an anti-coagulant, a fibrinolytic, an anti-thrombonic, an anti-mitotic, an anti-biotic, an anti-allergic, an anti-oxidant, an anti-proliferative and an anti-migratory. In some embodiments, the treatment agent can be an anti-inflammatory steroid or non-steroid. Examples of anti-inflammatory steroids include, but are not limited to, prednisone, oxymetholone, oxandrolone and methanodrostenolone. Examples of anti-inflammatory non-steroids (NSAID) include, but are not limited to, ibuprofen, diclofenac, diflunisal, fenoprofen, aspirin, sulindac, naproxen, indomethacin, piroxicam, ketoprofen, tolmetin and azapropazonelast.


The treatment agent can treat symptoms typically associated with tracheobronchial stent deployment, such as, inflammation, epithelial damage, granulation tissue formation and mucous plugging.


Methods of Delivery



FIGS. 4A-4C illustrate an over-the-wire type stent delivery balloon catheter 400 which can be used pursuant to embodiments of the present invention. Catheter 400 generally comprises an elongated catheter shaft 402 having an outer tubular member 404 and an inner tubular member 406. Inner tubular member 406 defines a guidewire lumen 408 adapted to slidingly receive a guidewire 410. The coaxial relationship between outer tubular member 404 and inner tubular member 406 defines annular inflation lumen 412 (see FIGS. 4B and 4C, illustrating transverse cross sections of the catheter 400 of FIG. 4A, taken along lines 2-2 and 3-3 respectively). An inflatable balloon 414 is disposed on a distal section of catheter shaft 402, having a proximal shaft section sealingly secured to the distal end of outer tubular member 404 and a distal shaft section sealingly secured to the distal end of inner tubular member 406, so that its interior is in fluid communication with inflation lumen 412. An adapter 416 at the proximal end of catheter shaft 402 is configured to direct inflation fluid through arm 418 into inflation lumen 412 and to provide access to guidewire lumen 408. Balloon 414 has an inflatable working length located between tapered sections of the balloon, with an expandable stent 420 mounted on the balloon working length. FIG. 4A illustrates the balloon 414 in an uninflated configuration prior to deployment of the stent 420. The distal end of catheter may be advanced to a desired region of a patient's body lumen 422 in a conventional manner, and balloon 414 inflated to expand stent 420, seating the stent in the body lumen 422. A stent cover 430 is on an outer surface of the stent 420. Stent cover 430 generally comprises a tubular body, which preferably conforms to a surface of the stent and expands with the stent during implantation thereof in the patient. Although stent cover 430 is illustrated on an outer surface of the stent 430 in FIG. 4A, the stent cover may be provided on all or part of an inner and/or an outer surface of the stent 420.


It should be appreciated that, in some embodiments, a self-expanding stent may be delivered by a stent delivery catheter without (or with) a balloon. Various methods are employed for delivery and implantation of a self-expanding stent. For instance, a self-expanding stent may be positioned at the distal end of a catheter around a core lumen. Self-expanding stents are typically held in an unexpanded state during delivery using a variety of methods including sheaths or sleeves which cover all or a portion of the stent. When the stent is in its desired location of the targeted vessel the sheath or sleeve is retracted to expose the stent which then self-expands upon retraction.


In some methods, a stent according to the present invention may be delivered to a tracheobronchial region by a stent delivery catheter (with or without a balloon) for treatment thereof.


From the foregoing detailed description, it will be evident that there are a number of changes, adaptations and modifications of the present invention which come within the province of those skilled in the part. The scope of the invention includes any combination of the elements from the different species and embodiments disclosed herein, as well as subassemblies, assemblies and methods thereof. However, it is intended that all such variations not departing from the spirit of the invention be considered as within the scope thereof.

Claims
  • 1. An implantable medical device comprising: a bioabsorbable tracheobronchial stent adapted to be positioned in a tracheobronchial passageway from a throat to lungs of a mammal, wherein the tracheobronchial stent is operable to hold open the tracheobronchial passageway from the throat to the lungs, the tracheobronchial stent having a generally tubular body comprising a single coiled fiber, the generally tubular body having a proximal concentric end region, a middle concentric region, and a distal concentric end region, wherein the proximal and distal concentric end regions each have a greater pitch and a greater pitch angle than a pitch and the pitch angle of the middle concentric region, wherein the pitch angle of the proximal and distal concentric end regions is between 50 degrees and 90 degrees and the pitch angle of the middle concentric region is 25 degrees to 70 degrees when the tracheobronchial stent is in a same state, and wherein an outer diameter of the middle concentric region is dimensioned to hold open the tracheobronchial passageway; anda first treatment agent and a second treatment agent disposed at least one of on and within at least a portion of the tracheobronchial stent, wherein the first and second treatment agents are subjected to controlled release, and wherein the first treatment agent is operable to treat mucous plugging and the second treatment agent is operable to treat granulation tissue formation.
  • 2. The implantable medical device of claim 1, further comprising an anti-inflammatory disposed at least one of on and within at least a portion of the tracheobronchial stent.
  • 3. The implantable medical device of claim 1, wherein the proximal and distal concentric end regions have greater pitch than the middle concentric region.
  • 4. The implantable medical device of claim 1, further comprising a third treatment agent at least one of on and within the stent, in which the third treatment agent comprises at least one selected from an anti-mitotic, an anti-proliferative and an anti-migratory.
  • 5. The implantable medical device of claim 1, wherein the implantable medical device is operable to be implanted within the tracheobronchial passageway.
  • 6. An implantable medical device comprising: a bioabsorbable tracheobronchial stent adapted to be positioned in a tracheobronchial passageway from a throat to lungs of a mammal, wherein the bioabsorbable tracheobronchial stent is operable to hold open the tracheobronchial passageway from the throat to the lungs, and has a generally tubular body comprising a single coiled fiber, the generally tubular body having a proximal concentric end region, a middle concentric region, and a distal concentric end region, wherein the middle concentric region is operable to hold open the tracheobronchial passageway, and wherein the proximal and distal concentric end regions have a pitch angle of between 50 degrees and 90 degrees and the middle concentric region has a pitch angle of 25 degrees to 70 degrees when the tracheobronchial stent is in a radially expanded state, a pitch and the pitch angle of the proximal concentric end region and the distal concentric end region are greater than a pitch and the pitch angle of the middle concentric region; anda first treatment agent and a second treatment agent each disposed at least one of on and within at least a portion of the tracheobronchial stent, wherein the first and second treatment agents (a) are subjected to controlled release and (b) the first treatment agent is to treat mucous plugging and the second treatment agent is to treat granulation tissue formation.
  • 7. The implantable medical device of claim 6, wherein the first treatment agent is combined with a polymer matrix forming a mixture, and wherein the mixture is coated on at least one of an abluminal surface and a luminal surface of the tracheobronchial stent.
  • 8. The implantable medical device of claim 7, wherein the polymer matrix comprises a polymer that is selected from the group consisting of polyglycolide, polylactide, and copolymers and combinations thereof.
  • 9. The implantable medical device of claim 6, wherein the first treatment agent is incorporated within the body of the tracheobronchial stent.
  • 10. The implantable medical device of claim 6, wherein the bioabsorbable tracheobronchial stent comprises a material selected from the group consisting of polylactide, polyglycolide, polycaprolactones, and copolymers and combinations thereof.
  • 11. The implantable medical device of claim 6, further comprising a treatment agent that is an anti-inflammatory.
  • 12. The implantable medical device of claim 11, wherein the anti-inflammatory is selected from the group consisting of prednisone, oxymetholone, oxandrolone, methanodrostenolone, ibuprofen, diclofenac, diflunisal, fenoprofen, aspirin, sulindac, naproxen, indomethacin, piroxicam, ketoprofen, tolmetin and azapropazonelast.
  • 13. The implantable medical device of claim 6, wherein the controlled release is from about 2 to about 24 months.
  • 14. The implantable medical device of claim 6, wherein the tracheobronchial stent is balloon expandable or self-expandable.
  • 15. The implantable medical device of claim 6, further comprising a treatment agent to treat inflammation.
  • 16. The implantable medical device of claim 6, further comprising a third treatment agent at least one of on and within the stent, in which the third treatment agent comprises at least one selected from an anti-mitotic, an anti-proliferative and an anti-migratory.
  • 17. The implantable medical device of claim 6, wherein the implantable medical device is operable to be implanted within the tracheobronchial passageway.
US Referenced Citations (334)
Number Name Date Kind
3687135 Stroganov et al. Aug 1972 A
3839743 Schwarcz Oct 1974 A
3900632 Robinson Aug 1975 A
4104410 Malecki Aug 1978 A
4110497 Hoel Aug 1978 A
4321711 Mano Mar 1982 A
4346028 Griffith Aug 1982 A
4596574 Urist Jun 1986 A
4599085 Riess et al. Jul 1986 A
4612009 Drobnik et al. Sep 1986 A
4633873 Dumican et al. Jan 1987 A
4656083 Hoffman et al. Apr 1987 A
4718907 Karwoski et al. Jan 1988 A
4722335 Vilasi Feb 1988 A
4723549 Wholey et al. Feb 1988 A
4732152 Wallsten et al. Mar 1988 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4739762 Palmaz Apr 1988 A
4740207 Kreamer Apr 1988 A
4743252 Martin, Jr. et al. May 1988 A
4760849 Kropf Aug 1988 A
4768507 Fischell et al. Sep 1988 A
4776337 Palmaz Oct 1988 A
4800882 Gianturco Jan 1989 A
4816339 Tu et al. Mar 1989 A
4818559 Hama et al. Apr 1989 A
4850999 Planck Jul 1989 A
4877030 Beck et al. Oct 1989 A
4878906 Lindemann et al. Nov 1989 A
4879135 Greco et al. Nov 1989 A
4886062 Wiktor Dec 1989 A
4902289 Yannas Feb 1990 A
4977901 Ofstead Dec 1990 A
4994298 Yasuda Feb 1991 A
5019090 Pinchuk May 1991 A
5028597 Kodama et al. Jul 1991 A
5059211 Stack et al. Oct 1991 A
5062829 Pryor et al. Nov 1991 A
5084065 Weldon et al. Jan 1992 A
5085629 Goldberg et al. Feb 1992 A
5100429 Sinofsky et al. Mar 1992 A
5104410 Chowdhary Apr 1992 A
5108417 Sawyer Apr 1992 A
5108755 Daniels et al. Apr 1992 A
5112457 Marchant May 1992 A
5123917 Lee Jun 1992 A
5156623 Hakamatsuka et al. Oct 1992 A
5163951 Pinchuk et al. Nov 1992 A
5163952 Froix Nov 1992 A
5163958 Pinchuk Nov 1992 A
5167614 Tessmann et al. Dec 1992 A
5192311 King et al. Mar 1993 A
5197977 Hoffman, Jr. et al. Mar 1993 A
5234456 Silvestrini Aug 1993 A
5234457 Andersen Aug 1993 A
5236447 Kubo et al. Aug 1993 A
5279594 Jackson Jan 1994 A
5282860 Matsuno et al. Feb 1994 A
5289831 Bosley Mar 1994 A
5290271 Jernberg Mar 1994 A
5306286 Stack et al. Apr 1994 A
5306294 Winston et al. Apr 1994 A
5328471 Slepian Jul 1994 A
5330500 Song Jul 1994 A
5342348 Kaplan Aug 1994 A
5342395 Jarrett et al. Aug 1994 A
5342621 Eury Aug 1994 A
5356433 Rowland et al. Oct 1994 A
5383925 Schmitt Jan 1995 A
5385580 Schmitt Jan 1995 A
5389106 Tower Feb 1995 A
5399666 Ford Mar 1995 A
5423885 Williams Jun 1995 A
5441515 Khosravi et al. Aug 1995 A
5443458 Eury Aug 1995 A
5443500 Sigwart Aug 1995 A
5455040 Marchant Oct 1995 A
5464650 Berg et al. Nov 1995 A
5502158 Sinclair et al. Mar 1996 A
5514379 Weissleder et al. May 1996 A
5527337 Stack et al. Jun 1996 A
5545408 Trigg et al. Aug 1996 A
5554120 Chen et al. Sep 1996 A
5556413 Lam Sep 1996 A
5575818 Pinchuk Nov 1996 A
5578046 Liu et al. Nov 1996 A
5578073 Haimovich et al. Nov 1996 A
5591199 Porter et al. Jan 1997 A
5591607 Gryaznov et al. Jan 1997 A
5593403 Buscemi Jan 1997 A
5593434 Williams Jan 1997 A
5599301 Jacobs et al. Feb 1997 A
5599922 Gryaznov et al. Feb 1997 A
5605696 Eury et al. Feb 1997 A
5607442 Fischell et al. Mar 1997 A
5607467 Froix Mar 1997 A
5618299 Khosravi et al. Apr 1997 A
5629077 Turnlund et al. May 1997 A
5631135 Gryaznov et al. May 1997 A
5632771 Boatman et al. May 1997 A
5632840 Campbell May 1997 A
5637113 Tartaglia et al. Jun 1997 A
5649977 Campbell Jul 1997 A
5667767 Greff et al. Sep 1997 A
5667796 Otten Sep 1997 A
5670558 Onishi et al. Sep 1997 A
5693085 Buirge et al. Dec 1997 A
5700286 Tartaglia et al. Dec 1997 A
5707385 Williams Jan 1998 A
5711763 Nonami et al. Jan 1998 A
5716981 Hunter et al. Feb 1998 A
5725549 Lam Mar 1998 A
5726297 Gryaznov et al. Mar 1998 A
5728751 Patnaik Mar 1998 A
5733326 Tomonto et al. Mar 1998 A
5733330 Cox Mar 1998 A
5733564 Lehtinen Mar 1998 A
5733925 Kunz et al. Mar 1998 A
5741881 Patnaik Apr 1998 A
5756457 Wang et al. May 1998 A
5756476 Epstein et al. May 1998 A
5765682 Bley et al. Jun 1998 A
5766204 Porter et al. Jun 1998 A
5766239 Cox Jun 1998 A
5766710 Turnlund et al. Jun 1998 A
5769883 Buscemi et al. Jun 1998 A
5780807 Saunders Jul 1998 A
5800516 Fine et al. Sep 1998 A
5811447 Kunz et al. Sep 1998 A
5824049 Ragheb et al. Oct 1998 A
5830178 Jones et al. Nov 1998 A
5830461 Billiar Nov 1998 A
5830879 Isner Nov 1998 A
5833651 Donovan et al. Nov 1998 A
5834582 Sinclair et al. Nov 1998 A
5836962 Gianotti Nov 1998 A
5837313 Ding et al. Nov 1998 A
5837835 Gryaznov et al. Nov 1998 A
5840083 Braach-Maksvytis Nov 1998 A
5851508 Greff et al. Dec 1998 A
5853408 Muni Dec 1998 A
5854207 Lee et al. Dec 1998 A
5855612 Ohthuki et al. Jan 1999 A
5855618 Patnaik et al. Jan 1999 A
5858746 Hubbell et al. Jan 1999 A
5865814 Tuch Feb 1999 A
5868781 Killion Feb 1999 A
5873904 Ragheb et al. Feb 1999 A
5874101 Zhong et al. Feb 1999 A
5874109 Ducheyne et al. Feb 1999 A
5874165 Drumheller Feb 1999 A
5876743 Ibsen et al. Mar 1999 A
5877263 Patnaik et al. Mar 1999 A
5879713 Roth et al. Mar 1999 A
5888533 Dunn Mar 1999 A
5891192 Murayama et al. Apr 1999 A
5897955 Drumheller Apr 1999 A
5906759 Richter May 1999 A
5914182 Drumheller Jun 1999 A
5916870 Lee et al. Jun 1999 A
5922005 Richter et al. Jul 1999 A
5942209 Leavitt et al. Aug 1999 A
5948428 Lee et al. Sep 1999 A
5954744 Phan et al. Sep 1999 A
5957975 Lafont et al. Sep 1999 A
5965720 Gryaznov et al. Oct 1999 A
5971954 Conway et al. Oct 1999 A
5976182 Cox Nov 1999 A
5980564 Stinson Nov 1999 A
5980928 Terry Nov 1999 A
5980972 Ding Nov 1999 A
5981568 Kunz et al. Nov 1999 A
5986169 Gjunter Nov 1999 A
5997468 Wolff et al. Dec 1999 A
6010455 Barnett et al. Jan 2000 A
6015541 Greff et al. Jan 2000 A
6042875 Ding et al. Mar 2000 A
6048964 Lee et al. Apr 2000 A
6051648 Rhee et al. Apr 2000 A
6056993 Leidner et al. May 2000 A
6060451 DiMaio et al. May 2000 A
6066156 Yan May 2000 A
6071266 Kelley Jun 2000 A
6074659 Kunz et al. Jun 2000 A
6080177 Igaki et al. Jun 2000 A
6080488 Hostettler et al. Jun 2000 A
6083258 Yadav Jul 2000 A
6093463 Thakrar Jul 2000 A
6096070 Ragheb et al. Aug 2000 A
6096525 Patnaik Aug 2000 A
6099562 Ding et al. Aug 2000 A
6103230 Billiar et al. Aug 2000 A
6107416 Patnaik et al. Aug 2000 A
6110188 Narciso, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6113629 Ken Sep 2000 A
6117979 Hendriks et al. Sep 2000 A
6120536 Ding et al. Sep 2000 A
6120904 Hostettler et al. Sep 2000 A
6121027 Clapper et al. Sep 2000 A
6125523 Brown et al. Oct 2000 A
6127173 Eckstein et al. Oct 2000 A
6129761 Hubbell Oct 2000 A
6129928 Sarangapani et al. Oct 2000 A
6150630 Perry et al. Nov 2000 A
6153252 Hossainy et al. Nov 2000 A
6159951 Karpeisky et al. Dec 2000 A
6160084 Langer et al. Dec 2000 A
6165212 Dereume et al. Dec 2000 A
6166130 Rhee et al. Dec 2000 A
6169170 Gryaznov et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171609 Kunz Jan 2001 B1
6174330 Stinson Jan 2001 B1
6177523 Reich et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183505 Mohn, Jr. et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187045 Fehring et al. Feb 2001 B1
6210715 Starling et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224626 Steinke May 2001 B1
6228845 Donovan et al. May 2001 B1
6240616 Yan Jun 2001 B1
6245076 Yan Jun 2001 B1
6245103 Stinson Jun 2001 B1
6248344 Ylanen et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251135 Stinson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251142 Bernacca et al. Jun 2001 B1
6273913 Wright et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281262 Shikinami Aug 2001 B1
6284333 Wang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287332 Bolz et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290721 Heath Sep 2001 B1
6293966 Frantzen Sep 2001 B1
6303901 Perry et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312459 Huang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327772 Zadno-Azizi et al. Dec 2001 B1
4733665 Palmaz Jan 2002 C2
6375826 Wang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379381 Hossainy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387121 Alt May 2002 B1
6388043 Langer et al. May 2002 B1
6395326 Castro et al. May 2002 B1
6409761 Jang Jun 2002 B1
6423092 Datta et al. Jul 2002 B2
6461632 Gogolewski Oct 2002 B1
6464720 Boatman et al. Oct 2002 B2
6479565 Stanley Nov 2002 B1
6485512 Cheng Nov 2002 B1
6492615 Flanagan Dec 2002 B1
6494908 Huxel et al. Dec 2002 B1
6495156 Wenz et al. Dec 2002 B2
6511748 Barrows Jan 2003 B1
6517888 Weber Feb 2003 B1
6527801 Dutta Mar 2003 B1
6537589 Chae et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539607 Fehring et al. Apr 2003 B1
6540777 Stenzel Apr 2003 B2
6554854 Flanagan Apr 2003 B1
6565599 Hong et al. May 2003 B1
6569191 Hogan May 2003 B1
6569193 Cox et al. May 2003 B1
6572672 Yadav et al. Jun 2003 B2
6574851 Mirizzi Jun 2003 B1
6585755 Jackson et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592614 Lenker et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592617 Thompson Jul 2003 B2
6613072 Lau et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626939 Burnside et al. Sep 2003 B1
6635269 Jennissen Oct 2003 B1
6645243 Vallana et al. Nov 2003 B2
6656162 Santini, Jr. et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664335 Krishnan Dec 2003 B2
6666214 Canham Dec 2003 B2
6667049 Janas et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669723 Killion et al. Dec 2003 B2
6676697 Richter Jan 2004 B1
6679980 Andreacchi Jan 2004 B1
6689375 Wahlig et al. Feb 2004 B1
6695920 Pacetti et al. Feb 2004 B1
6706273 Roessler Mar 2004 B1
6709379 Brandau et al. Mar 2004 B1
6719934 Stinson Apr 2004 B2
6719989 Matsushima et al. Apr 2004 B1
6720402 Langer et al. Apr 2004 B2
6746773 Llanos et al. Jun 2004 B2
6752826 Holloway et al. Jun 2004 B2
6753007 Haggard et al. Jun 2004 B2
6764505 Hossainy et al. Jul 2004 B1
6814754 Greenhalgh Nov 2004 B2
6818063 Kerrigan Nov 2004 B1
6846323 Yip et al. Jan 2005 B2
6997946 Girton et al. Feb 2006 B2
7582108 Hierlemann et al. Sep 2009 B2
20010029398 Jadhav Oct 2001 A1
20010044652 Moore Nov 2001 A1
20020002399 Huxel et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020004060 Heublein et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020004101 Ding et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020062148 Hart May 2002 A1
20020065553 Weber May 2002 A1
20020082682 Barclay et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020111590 Davila et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116050 Kocur Aug 2002 A1
20020138133 Lenz et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020161114 Gunatillake et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030004563 Jackson et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030033001 Igaki Feb 2003 A1
20030069629 Jadhav et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030093107 Parsonage et al. May 2003 A1
20030100865 Santini, Jr. et al. May 2003 A1
20030105518 Dutta Jun 2003 A1
20030105530 Pirhonen Jun 2003 A1
20030170287 Prescott Sep 2003 A1
20030171053 Sanders Sep 2003 A1
20030187495 Cully et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208256 DiMatteo et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030208259 Penhasi Nov 2003 A1
20030209835 Chun et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030226833 Shapovalov et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236565 Fiter Dec 2003 A1
20040093077 White et al. May 2004 A1
20040098095 Burnside et al. May 2004 A1
20040111149 Stinson Jun 2004 A1
20040116958 Gopferich et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127970 Weber Jul 2004 A1
20040143317 Stinson et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167610 Fleming, III Aug 2004 A1
20050021131 Venkatraman et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050049694 Neary Mar 2005 A1
20050137678 Varma Jun 2005 A1
20050149172 Varma Jul 2005 A1
20050177246 Datta et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050240147 Makower et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245906 Makower et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060018948 Guire et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060041102 Hossainy et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060070626 Frazier et al. Apr 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (36)
Number Date Country
44 07 079 Sep 1994 DE
197 31 021 Jan 1999 DE
198 56 983 Dec 1999 DE
0 108 171 May 1984 EP
0 144 534 Jun 1985 EP
0 364 787 Apr 1990 EP
0 397 500 Nov 1990 EP
0 464 755 Jan 1992 EP
0 493 788 Jul 1992 EP
0 554 082 Aug 1993 EP
0 578 998 Jan 1994 EP
0 604 022 Jun 1994 EP
0 621 017 Oct 1994 EP
0 623 354 Nov 1994 EP
0 665 023 Aug 1995 EP
0 709 068 May 1996 EP
0 970 711 Jan 2000 EP
2 247 696 Mar 1992 GB
WO 8903232 Apr 1989 WO
WO 9001969 Mar 1990 WO
WO 9004982 May 1990 WO
WO 9006094 Jun 1990 WO
WO 9117744 Nov 1991 WO
WO 9117789 Nov 1991 WO
WO 9210218 Jun 1992 WO
WO 9306792 Apr 1993 WO
WO 9421196 Sep 1994 WO
WO 9529647 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9804415 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9903515 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9916386 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9942147 Aug 1999 WO
WO 0012147 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0064506 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0101890 Jan 2001 WO
WO 2004023985 Mar 2004 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (35)
Entry
Anonymous, “Bioabsorbable stent mounted on a catheter having optical coherence tomography capabilities,” Research Disclosure, Sep. 2004, pp. 1159-1162.
Ansari, “Tubal Reanastomosis Using Absorbable Stent,” International Journal of Fertility, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 242-243 (1978).
Ansari, “End-to-end tubal anastomosis using an absorbable stent,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 32(2), pp. 197-201 (Aug. 1979).
Casper et al., “Fiber-Reinforced Absorbable Composite for Orthopedic Surgery,” Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 53, pp. 497-501 (1985).
Detweiler et al., “Gastrointestinal Sutureless Anastomosis Using Fibrin Glue: Reinforcement of the Sliding Absorbable Inraluminal Nontoxic Stent and Development of a Stent Placement Device,” Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 9(2), pp. 111-130 (Mar./Apr. 1996).
Detweiler et al., “Sliding, Absorbable, Reinforced Ring and an Axially Driven Stent Placement Device for Sutureless Fibrin Glue Gastrointestinal Anastomisis,” Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 9(6), pp. 495-504 (Nov./Dec. 1996j.
Detweiler et al., “Sutureless Anastomosis of the Small Intestine and the Colon in Pigs Using an Absorbable Intraluminal Stent and Fibrin Glue,” Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 8(2), pp. 129-140 (Mar. 1995).
Detweiler et al., “Sutureless Cholecystojejunostomy in Pigs Using an Absorbable Intraluminal Stent and Fibrin Glue,” Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 9(1), pp. 13-26 (Jan./Feb. 1996).
Devanathan et al., “Polymeriic Conformal Coatings for Implantable Electronic Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-27(11), pp. 671-675 (1980).
Elbert et al., “Conjugate Addition Reactions Combined with Free-Radical Cross-Linking for the Design of Materials for Tissue Engineering,” Biomacromolecules 2, pp. 430-441 (2001).
Feng-Chun et al., “Assessment of Tissue Blood Flow Following Small Artery Welding with an Intraluminal Dissolvable Stent,” Microsurgery, vol. 19(3), pp. 148-152 (1999).
Hahn et al., “Blocompatibility of Glow-Discharge-Polymerized Films and Vacuum-Deposited Parylene,” J Applied Polymer Sci, vol. 38, pp. 55-64 (1984).
Hahn et al., “Glow Discharge Polymers as Coatings for Implanted Devices,” ISA, pp. 109-111 (1981).
Hossainy et al., “Biocompatible coating for implantable medical devices,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/317,435, filed Dec. 11, 2002.
Kelley et al., “Totally Resorbable High-Strength Composite Material,” Advances in Biomedical Polymers, vol. 35, pp. 75-85 (1987).
Kubies et al., “Microdomain Structure in polylactide-block-poly(ethylene oxide) copolymer films,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, pp. 529-536 (2000).
Kutryk at al., “Coronary Stenting: Current Perspectives,” a companion to the Handbook of Coronary Stents, pp. i-16 (1999).
Martin et al., “Enhancing the biological activity of immobilized osteopontin using a type-1 collagen affinity coating,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., vol. 70A, pp. 10-19 (2004).
Mauduit at al., “Hydrolytic degradation of films prepared from blends of high and low molecular weight poly(DL-lactic acid)s,” J. Blamed. Mater. Res., vol. 30, pp. 201-207 (1996).
McClay, “Laryngeal and Tracheal Stents,” Emedicine, (Aug. 18, 2004). Mar. 21, 2006: <http://www.emedicine.com/ent/topic593htm>.
Middleton et al., “Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, pp. 2335-2346 (2000).
Muller at al., “Advances in Coronary Angioplasty: Endovascular Stents,” Caron. Arter. Dis., vol. 1(4), pp. 438-448 (Jul./Aug. 1990).
Nichols et al., “Electrical Insulation of Implantable Devices by Composite Polymer Coatings,” ISA Transactions, vol. 26(4), pp. 15-18 (1987).
Peuster et al., “A novel approach to temporary stenting: degradable cardiovascular stents produced from corrodible metal-results 6-18 months after implantation into New Zealand white rabbits,” Heart, vol. 86, pp. 563-569 (2001).
Pietrzak et al., “Bioresorbable implants—practical considerations,” Bone, vol. 19, No. 1, suppl., pp. 109S-119S (Jul. 1996).
Pietrzak at al., “Bioabsorbable Fixation Devices: Status for the Craniomaxillofacial Surgeon,” J. Craniofaxial Surg., vol. 2, pp. 92-96 (1997).
von Recum et al., “Degradation of polydispersed poly(L-lactic acid) to modulate lactic acid release,” Biomaterials, vol. 16, pp. 441-445 (1995).
Redman, “Clinical Experience with Vasovasostomy Utilizing Absorbable Intravasal Stent,” Urology, vol. 20(1), pp. 59-61 (Jul. 1982).
Rust et al., “The Effect of Absorbable Stenting on Postoperative Stenosis of the Surgically Enlarged Maxillary Sinus Ostia in a Rabbit Animal Model,” Archives of Otolaryngology, vol. 122(12), pp. 1395-1397 (Dec. 1996).
Schatz, “A View of Vascular Stents,” Circulation, vol. 79(2), pp. 445-457 (Feb. 1989).
Schmidt et al., “Long-Term Implants of Parylene-C Coated Microelectrodes,” Med & Blot Eng & Comp, vol. 26(1), pp. 96-101 (Jan. 1988).
Spagnuoio et al., “Gas 1 is induced by VE-cadherin and vascular endothelial growth factor and inhibits endothelial cell apoptosis,” Blood, vol. 103, pp. 3005-3012 (2004).
Tamai et al., “Initial and 6-Month Results of Biodegradable Poly-I-Lactic Acid Coronary Stents in Humans,” Circulation, pp. 399-404 (2000).
Tsuji et al., “Biodegradable Polymeric Stents,” Current Interventional Cardiology Reports, vol. 3, pp. 10-17 (2001).
Volker at al., “Targeting of immunoliposomes to endothelial cells using a single-chain Fv fragment directed against human endoglin (CD105),” Biochemica et Blophysica Acta, 1663, pp. 158-166 (2004).