1. The Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to tracking devices and corresponding communication systems and methods of use and, even more particularly, to tracking devices having enhanced security mounting strap configurations and corresponding systems and methods of use.
2. The Relevant Technology
Criminal offenders who have been granted parole, or accused offenders awaiting trial and disposition, are often granted the ability to remain outside conventional incarceration facilities with the use of current monitoring and tracking technologies. These technologies include the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (“GPS”) for position determination and cellular and other wireless communication technologies for communicating position and status information to monitoring centers and appropriate authorities. A tracking device that is attached to an individual for the purpose of monitoring and tracking the individual is often referred to as an offender tracking device (“OTD”) or a remote tracking device (“RTD”).
A problem with current tracking devices is that the mounting strap that is used to secure the tracking device to an individual being monitored can often be broken or cut, sometimes with only common scissors, and quickly removed. Once removed, the individual to which the device was affixed can quickly leave the area and escape monitoring and the tracking system altogether.
While the complete severing of a mounting strap and the removal of an existing tracking device can often generate an alarm, the speed at which existing straps can be cut is such that the offender will typically have ample time to flee the location where the tracking device was removed before enforcement authorities can be summoned to that location. In the past, this has resulted in successful escapes by tracked individuals defeating such systems and, therefore, poses a real danger to the public.
In view of the importance of providing reliable tracking and monitoring of offenders and other persons of interest, any improvements in the design and integrity of the tracking devices, and monitoring systems in general, is desirable.
The tracking devices of the present invention are provided with enhanced security characteristics. For instance, in some embodiments, a structurally enhanced mounting strap is configured to help trigger an alarm in response to an attempt to sever, break or otherwise remove the mounting strap from an individual wearing the tracking device. Enhanced structural elements are also provided to help the tracking device remain intact for a sufficiently long interval after tampering of the mounting strap has begun and the alarm has been sounded so as to provide the authorities a sufficient amount of time to dispatch resources to locate and apprehend the individual prior to the mounting strap being completely severed or destroyed and the tracking device being completely removed.
According to some embodiments, a mounting means, such as a mounting strap, is reinforced by one or more reinforcing means, such as one or more secondary straps or cables that are attached to the primary mounting strap and which are composed of a cut resistant material. The tracking device also includes tamper detection means for triggering an alarm in response to various conditions that evince tampering of the tracking device, such as an attempted severing of the mounting strap. The tamper detection means include continuity wires, fiber optics and/or other signal carrying structures which are used in combination with internal circuitry, processor components and/or software modules that monitor signal continuity through the mounting strap.
According to some embodiments, the reinforcing means and tamper detection means are positioned or otherwise situated relative to each other along the mounting strap or other mounting means in such a way that the reinforcing means prevent the mounting strap or other mounting means from being completely severed or broken and removed from an offender and while still enabling the tamper detection means to detect tampering and to trigger an alarm.
According to some embodiments, the reinforcing means and tamper detection means are positioned along the mounting strap or other mounting means in such a way that the reinforcing means cover or are positioned adjacent to at least a portion of the tamper detection means in such a way that an attempted breaking or severing of the reinforcing means will cause the reinforcing means to apply a force to the tamper detection means that is sufficient to trigger an alarm from the tamper detection means prior to the reinforcing means being completely severed or broken.
This summary has been provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that is further described below in the detailed description. The summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Additional features and advantages will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the teachings herein. Features and advantages of the invention may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. Features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
To further clarify the above and other advantages and features of embodiments of the present invention, a more particular description of embodiments of the present invention will be rendered by reference to the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
The present invention will now be described with respect to exemplary embodiments in a specific context, namely, an offender tracking device having enhanced security features. It will be appreciated, however, that the principles of the present invention are applicable to many fields beyond offender tracking devices including, without limitation, general prisoner management, the medical environment, personal monitoring, animal tracking, and the defense industry.
Various terms that are used throughout this document will now be defined to help provide clarity to the described and claimed embodiments.
Initially, the term “tracking device”, which is sometimes referred to herein as a “remote tracking device” or “offender tracking device” should not be limited by use to exclude devices that are not worn by offenders or parolees. Instead, the tracking devices described in this application should be broadly construed to apply to any tracking or monitoring device, including tracking devices that can be carried, worn or used by animals, objects (e.g., motorized vehicles, bicycles, computing equipment, containers and other devices) and persons who may or may not be considered offenders or parolees.
The term “detecting means”, as used herein, refers to any electronic circuitry and corresponding software that can be used for detecting a location and status of the tracking device. According to some embodiments, the term “detecting means” refers to the internal GPS receivers and antennas, cellular transceivers used to perform tower triangulation, internal processors, system memory, and software stored in the system memory that is executed by the internal processors.
The term “communication means”, as used herein, generally refers to any electronic circuitry and corresponding software that can be used to enable a tracking device to wirelessly communicate with a remote location, such as, for example, by transmitting location and status information and for receiving data from a monitoring center, as well as for enabling voice communications with one or more parties. According to some embodiments, the term “communication means” refers to short range wireless transceivers, voice-capable peripherals, cellular antennas and cellular transceivers, internal processors, system memory, and software stored in the system memory that is executed by the internal processors.
The term “mounting means” as used herein, generally refers to any physical structure that can be used to mount the disclosed tracking device(s) to an individual or object. According to some embodiments, the term “mounting means” refers to a strap, cable, band or other structure that is capable of being secured to a person or object, as well as the elements that are used to secure the strap, cable, band or other structure to the person or object, such as a latch, screw, adhesive or other mechanical or chemical bonding agent, as described in more detail below. In some embodiments, the mounting means include a mounting strap assembly that includes layers of components that are affixed to the tracking device with mounting elements, such as screws, rivets and/or anchors to a desired person or object.
The term “tamper detection means”, as used herein, generally refers to any electronic circuitry and corresponding software, as well as any physical objects that can be used to enable the detection of one or more conditions that evince tampering of the mounting strap or other component of the tracking device and for responsively triggering an alarm to the one or more conditions that evince the tampering. According to some embodiments, the tamper detection means include optical and/or electrical transceivers, optical fibers, continuity wires, signal processors and software modules that are capable of detecting signal continuity and discontinuity, as well as software modules that define alarm conditions and rules for generating corresponding alarms and speakers for emitting alarms and the communication means for communicating alarm data.
The term “reinforcing means” as used herein, generally refers to any physical structure that can be used to reinforce the mounting means, defined above, and for generally reinforcing the mounting of the tracking device(s) to an entity or object. According to some embodiments, the term “reinforcing means” refers to a cut resistant and hardened plastic or metal strap, cable, sheath, covering, a cut resistant fabric, or other cut resistant material which is positioned alongside, outside or inside the primary mounting strap, as described in more detail below.
Network/Tracking Device
To further aid in an understanding of the embodiments described above, some exemplary embodiments of the tracking device and corresponding internal and network components will now be described in more detail with reference to
In addition to a GPS engine, the tracking device 101 includes a wireless/cellular transceiver. After a location determination has been made by the GPS engine or an internal microprocessor, the location information and information indicating the status of the tracking device is sent over a terrestrial network, which is preferably a cellular network, as shown by cellular network 103. It will be appreciated, however, that other networks can also be used, such as, but not limited to, WiMax networks. In order to be useful, each position location for the tracking device needs to include an indication of the time for the location. In a preferred embodiment, the tracking device uses the time information contained in the GPS signals themselves to provide the time indication for the position determination, however, instead of using the time information from the GPS signal, the tracking device itself may provide the time indication from an internal clock. An internal clock may also be used to provide time indications on when data packets were created and sent using the cellular connection.
The information sent by the tracking device 101 over its cellular connection is received by monitoring center 104. Monitoring center 104 is preferably a staffed monitoring center providing representatives who can act as an intermediary between the person or object being monitored and the parole officer, supervisor or administrator with responsibility for the entity being monitored. The monitoring center 104 also includes the computer resources required to process, store and analyze the data received from the tracking device(s) and provide the interface for the officers/supervisors/administrators to review the information in the system and to setup, modify and terminate the operating parameters for each individual tracking device. While the present embodiment is described in terms of a ‘monitoring center’, it will be appreciated that the invention also contemplates the use of data centers in place of monitoring centers. Data centers typically have a smaller human staff than some traditional monitoring centers and utilize sophisticated automated computer equipment in place of some human operators.
Access to the information in the monitoring center or data center is available through a web interface which connects to a network 105, such as the Internet, which allows persons with authorization 106 outside the monitoring center to access information in the monitoring center's computers. Additionally, cellular network 103 can also be used to establish two-way voice communication between the tracking device(s) and the monitoring center, or responsible officer/supervisor/administrator. While reference is made to two-way voice communication, the term two-way is meant to encompass any interactive voice communication involving two or more parties, including three or more-way voice communication and would include conference type calls and multiparty calls. The two-way voice communications may use the same infrastructure as the data connections between the tracking device and monitoring center, or may use a completely different infrastructure or alternative paths through the network than the data connections. Other third parties may also be in the voice or data path between the tracking device and monitoring center to provide any number of functions, including the recording and archival of the voice communications between the tracking device and monitoring center, and still be within the scope of the concepts described herein. As described herein, voice communications can also be rendered in the form of pre-recorded messages sent from the monitoring/data center, which are recorded as voice messages prior to being sent or that are, alternatively, entered as text at the monitoring/data center or administrator computer and then subsequently translated from text to speech at the sending computing system, at the tracking device or any intermediary communication device.
Referring now to
The single housing 201 is configured to contain all electrical components necessary for tracking and communicating with the individual wearing device 200. Battery 202 provides power to the electronic circuitry within housing 201, as described below, and is preferably rechargeable. Top side 203 of housing 201 includes a first set of through ports 204. Another side 205 of housing 201 includes a second set of through ports 206. The first set of through ports 204 is configured to allow sound to pass through to a microphone (not shown) disposed within housing 201, while the second set of through ports 206 is configured to allow sound to pass outward from a speaker (not shown) which is also disposed within the housing 201. Top side 203 of housing 201 also includes two panels 207 and 208, at least one of which is configured as a rocker button to activate one or more of the electronic components described below.
The rear face of device 200 includes an appropriate curvature so that it can be attached to a person's body, preferably to an ankle, or to another object. Each end of a strap 209 (partially shown) is secured within an extension on each side of housing 201, such as extension 210. Strap 209 and the strap connections to housing 201 are tamper resistant and include security measures intended to prevent the disconnection or severing of strap 209, or if strap 209 is severed, device 200 can provide a signal indicating the status of the strap. The strap preferably includes one or more optical fibers and/or conductive materials embedded throughout its length, each of which is exposed at either end of the strap and connected to the electronics in device 200 which can determine the integrity of the connections, as described in more detail below.
Additional tamper detection may be achieved through monitoring all externally accessible fasteners, e.g., the screws affixing the pressure block to the housing, the battery, and the like, for electrical continuity by using each fastener to complete, or as part of, an electrical circuit.
Referring now to
Cellular transceiver 307 may be of the GSM/GPRS variety, and may include a SIM card 309. Cellular transceiver 307 allows two-way voice and data communication between the remote device and the monitoring center 104 from
Electronics 300 also include, in some embodiments, a short range wireless transceiver 313 and associated antenna 314 which, if included, allows for short range wireless voice and data communications with peripheral devices. This second wireless transceiver 313 can be chosen to utilize the wireless communications standard published by the ZigBee Alliance or another communication standard, including but not limited to Bluetooth technologies. Accordingly, it will be appreciated that wireless transceiver 313 may be designed and implemented using any of the alternative wireless communication standards which are well known in the art. Microprocessor 301 can be programmed to pass through voice communications received by cellular transceiver 307 to a voice-capable peripheral when such a peripheral is employed in conjunction with the remote tracking and communication device and is activated. Voice communications received from a voice enabled peripheral can be passed through to cellular transceiver 307 for transmission. Data generated by the device or received from a peripheral, if any, may be stored by microprocessor 301 in memory 315, which can be non-volatile memory such as serial flash memory until required by microprocessor 301 or until it is to be transmitted by the device.
GPS receiver 316 and antenna 317 receive signals transmitted by GPS satellites, the signal used to establish the geographical location of the device and the person being monitored. In one embodiment, data from GPS receiver 316 is passed through to microprocessor 301, which in turn processes the data to determine a location and associated time, and stores it in the serial flash memory 315 pending transmission using cellular transceiver 307. While electronics 300 are shown with a GPS receiver which passes the GPS signal data to the microprocessor for processing, a GPS engine which includes both the GPS receiver and the capability to process the GPS signal to produce a location determination and associated time indication may also be used according to the concepts described herein. Using a standalone GPS engine frees up processing bandwidth in the microprocessor, according to some embodiments, thereby allowing the microprocessor to perform other additional functions or generally improving responsiveness and processing capabilities of the tracking device.
Cellular transceiver 307 may also be used to geographically locate the device through any appropriate methods, including well known methods of cell tower triangulation, or may be used to provide location information used in assisted GPS schemes. Geographical location using cellular transceiver 307 may be performed in addition to, in conjunction with, or as a substitute for the GPS receiver 316. Other known methods for geographically locating the device may also be employed.
Either of memories 302 and 315, or memory resident on the microprocessor, may be used individually, or may be used in any combination to store the operating program and parameters for the operation of the device and may further be used to store prerecorded messages which can be played through speaker 311 as part of the monitoring and alarm management system in response to a received command or detected alarm condition.
A siren/speaker 323 may also be included in the device and controlled by microprocessor 301. Siren 323 is used as part of the alarm system to provide a high decibel audible alarm. This alarm can both warn those in the vicinity that the person being monitored has entered an exclusion zone or left an inclusion zone, and can aid the police in the location of the person being monitored. The siren can be activated automatically by the microprocessor as part of the alarm management system in response to a locally detected alarm condition or can be activated remotely by sending a signal to the microprocessor using cellular transceiver 307.
Siren 323 can be a separate device or could be combined with the functionality of speaker 311. LED light emissions can also be activated with the speaker in response to an alarm condition or a command received from a remote source. Tamper detection circuit 322 monitors the condition of strap 209 from
In the embodiment shown in
In embodiments that utilize an external battery, external battery 319 is removable and is preferably rechargeable by a separate recharging unit. Also, a person being monitored will preferably have multiple external batteries so that a charged external battery can be immediately inserted when a discharged battery is removed.
Internal battery 320 is preferably internal to the housing and not accessible by the person being monitored. The internal battery allows the device to continue to operate normally while the external battery is being replaced (for embodiments that utilize an external battery). If an external battery is used, the internal battery is intended to supply power to the device only during the transitioning from a depleted external battery to a charged external battery, or to provide a short amount of time to acquire a charged battery. Accordingly, the internal battery does not need to have a large capacity and can be charged using power from external battery 319 using voltage converter 321 and/or a battery charger which may be connected to the device through voltage converter 321.
When an external battery is not used, the internal battery is provided with a sufficient capacity to be worn for many hours and, in some instances, days between recharging.
Since tracking device 200 is typically intended to be worn around the ankle of the person being monitored, the microphone and speaker used for two-way voice communication is a significant distance from the ears and mouth of the person being monitored. To compensate for this, a peripheral device may be used in conjunction with the tracking device to aid in the two-way voice communication. In one embodiment the peripheral device has the form factor of a watch and includes an internal speaker, an internal microphone, and an internal short range wireless transceiver. The microphone and speaker are positioned in the housing of the peripheral to better enable voice communications. The short range wireless transceiver is configured to use the same wireless communications standard as the tracking device to enable wireless voice and data communications between the device and the peripheral. A button can be included which, when pressed, causes a command signal to be sent to the tracking device. This command signal can be used to instruct the remote tracking and communication device to initiate two-way voice communications with the monitoring center. When the peripheral device is used for such voice communications, the peripheral device communicates wirelessly with the tracking device using the respective short range wireless transceiver of each respective unit, and the tracking device then uses the cellular transceiver to connect the voice communications with the monitoring center. The microphone and speaker in the tracking device can be disabled by the microprocessor when a peripheral device, such as described, is in use.
Using electronics such as those described above, or in similar embodiments anticipated by this invention, the remote tracking devices according to the concepts described herein may be programmed with a variety of useful features. One such feature is the ability to track the geographical location of the individual wearing the device. Most frequently, the GPS receiver is used to determine the location of the device (and thus the wearer) at the time indicated in the GPS signals received from GPS network satellites. When the GPS is unable to determine the location, the cellular transceiver may be used to determine the location of the device using well-known cellular tower triangulation techniques. Once identified, the location of the device is passed to the microprocessor, which processes the data according to its programming and stores the data in the memory. The data can be sent at regular intervals to an appropriate entity such as a monitoring center, in response to a specific request and on demand, in grouped batches or in any other desired manner. Programming modules stored in the tracking device can also detect and track tampering with the tracking device and, even more specifically, with the mounting strap of the tracking device.
The specific electronic components of the tracking device which have been described above can be replaced or augmented with other special purpose or general-purpose computer hardware, including one or more additional processors and system memory. As described above, the tracking device includes memory which comprises physical and other computer-readable media for carrying or storing computer-executable instructions and/or data structures. Such computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer system.
Notably, computer-readable media that store computer-executable instructions are computer storage media and are distinguished from computer-readable media that merely carry computer-executable instructions, such as transmission media. Thus, by way of example, and not limitation, embodiments of the invention can comprise at least two distinctly different kinds of computer-readable media: computer storage media and transmission media. The embodiments of the present invention can utilize any combination of the foregoing computer readable media.
By way of example, computer storage media includes RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer.
Transmissions media, on the other hand, can include a network and/or data links which can be used to carry a desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced in network computing environments with many types of computer system configurations, including, personal computers, desktop computers, laptop computers, message processors, hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, mobile telephones, PDAs, pagers, routers, switches, and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed system environments where local and remote computer systems, which are linked (either by hardwired data links, wireless data links, or by a combination of hardwired and wireless data links) through a network, both perform tasks. In a distributed system environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
Attention will now be directed to some of the specific structures which, according to some embodiments, can help facilitate tamper detection of the tracking devices and which can also help facilitate enhanced structural integrity of the tracking devices.
Mounting Strap Assembly
As mentioned above, one problem with some existing tracking devices is that the mounting strap that is used to secure the tracking devices can often be broken or cut, sometimes with only common scissors, and quickly removed. Once removed, the entity to which the device was affixed can quickly leave the area and escape monitoring and the tracking system altogether.
While the complete severing of a mounting strap and the removal of an existing tracking device can often generate an alarm, the speed at which existing straps can be cut is such that an offender, for example, will typically have ample time to flee the location where the tracking device was removed before enforcement authorities can be summoned to that location.
According to the present invention, the structural integrity of the mounting strap is augmented or reinforced with the structural support of one or more secondary straps that are composed of a cut resistant material and that are placed alongside the primary mounting strap. This strengthening of primary mounting strap with the one or more secondary straps results in a single integral mounting strap or assembly. Appreciably, this additional structural support makes it more difficult to completely sever the mounting strap (in addition to the secondary straps). Accordingly, prior to the mounting strap being completely severed, or destroyed, an alarm is generated and authorities are notified of the alarm, often with sufficient time to respond to the alarm and locate and apprehend the offender prior to the tracking device being removed from the offender.
As indicated above, the tracking device 400 contains electronic navigation (e.g., GPS), tamper detection and communication components which are enclosed in an electronic housing 405 typically composed of a structurally tough dielectric material. A dielectric material is used to facilitate transmission of the GPS and communication signals.
Mounting elements 410 are typically used to facilitate the secure mounting of the mounting strap 415 to the housing. Additionally, screws, bolts, or other fasteners may be used in such a manner that the mounted tracking device cannot be removed without severing or otherwise destroying the mounting strap.
Turning now to
With respect to an enlarged end section view of mounting strap 505 of
Additional metallic conductors, such as foils or wires not used for adding strength to the mounting strap (not presently shown but comprehended) can also be added solely for the purpose of monitoring continuity of the strap so that the metallic cables shown can be used only for adding strength if desired.
Additionally, in some embodiments, the mounting strap 505 includes an optical fiber 520 whose purpose is to sense a severing of the mounting strap 505 with resultant alarms being generated in a manner similar to that described for an electrical cable. Optical transceivers and other circuitry within the tracking device can detect a break within the optical fiber.
It will be appreciated that any of the disclosed means for detecting a mounting strap being compromised or tampered with, such as the optical fibers, metallic conductors or metallic cables, or any other signal carrying elements which carry signals to the tamper detection circuitry in the housing of the tracking device can also be referred to herein as continuity cables.
While some existing tracking devices contain one or more continuity cables or alternative means for detecting a mounting strap being compromised, currently available tracking devices do not provide a means for detecting tampering as well as enhanced reinforcing means for causing the tracking device to remain attached to the individual for a sufficient time, after an alarm is triggered in response to tampering, to allow authorities to respond to the alarm and apprehend the individual before the tracking device is completely removed.
As indicated, the primary mounting strap 615 includes a secondary strap 620 positioned alongside the primary mounting strap 615 which covers at least a portion of the primary mounting strap 615 to provide a barrier to resist complete severing of the mounting strap assembly.
In some embodiments, the cut resistant material of the secondary strap 620 cannot be cut through without first cutting or damaging the primary mounting strap 615 as well as the continuity sensing elements within the mounting strap assembly. Since the cut resistant material of the secondary strap 620 cannot be easily cut, additional time is required by an individual to complete the action of removing the offender tracking device. This can provide authorities sufficient time to be summoned and respond to the alarm generated in response to the initial cutting of or tampering with the mounting strap or tracking device, while the offender tracking device continues to remain affixed to the individual and while that individual can continue to be tracked.
Materials for the cut resistant material include, but are not limited to, metals, such as hardened steels, Kevlars, layered elastomerics, composites, and other such types of materials both natural and synthetic. Bonding or attachment of the secondary strap 620 to the primary mounting strap 615 may be accomplished with adhesives, rivets, clamps or any suitable combination of the above or other similar types of attachment means. The secondary strap 620 can also be mounted directly to the housing of the tracking device with any of the attachment means described above.
The thickness of the secondary strap 620 can vary in size. In some embodiments the secondary strap 620 has a thickness between 0.5 and 5 mm. In other embodiments the secondary strap 620 has a thickness of between 1 and 3 mm. Width of the secondary strap 620 is preferably narrower than the width of the primary mounting strap, although the widths can also be the same. In some embodiments, the width of the secondary strap 620 is within a range of about 6 mm and 25 mm. In other embodiments, the width of the secondary strap 620 is within a range of about 8 mm and 15 mm. Other dimensions can also be used.
The primary mounting strap 615 and the secondary strap 620 may also be enclosed or encased within another material such as, but not limited to, an elastomeric sheath, wrapping, sprayed materials, or other covering. In some embodiments, the primary and secondary straps can also be extruded together as a single laminate strap.
It will be appreciated that the secondary strap can be positioned along any portion of the primary strap 615. In some embodiments, the secondary strap 620 is affixed to the primary strap 615 and does not extend the entire length of the primary strap 615. In other embodiments, the secondary strap 620 extends along the entire length of the primary strap 615 and is coupled to the primary strap or directly coupled to the mounting element(s) 610 of the tracking device housing.
It will be appreciated that the secondary strap 620 can also operate as part of the tamper detection means by completing a circuit through the mounting elements, the secondary strap and corresponding circuitry in the tracking device, such that the secondary strap 620 cannot be removed without destroying the continuity of the mounting strap assembly and triggering an alarm. In alternative embodiments, the mounting elements are electrically connected to the continuity wires and internal circuitry so as to form a circuit that can be used to detect tampering/removal of the mounting elements.
As shown, a housing or electronic shell 705 is affixed to the mounting straps via a mounting element 710 with a similar mounting element on the other side of the electronic shell 705. Alternatively, the mounting straps may be permanently affixed to one side of the electronic shell 705 in which case only a single mounting element 710 is required.
The cut resistant material of the secondary strap 720 helps to prevent severing of the mounting strap assembly and removal of the tracking device during use. In some embodiments, for example, the cut resistant material cannot be cut without first cutting the primary mounting strap 715 or sensing elements above or around it, such as continuity wires or optical fibers, and thereby triggering an alarm in response to the signal discontinuity that results from the cutting or other damage to the sensing elements, as described above.
Since the cut resistant material of the secondary strap 720 cannot be easily cut, additional time is required by an individual to complete the action of removing the offender tracking device. This gives authorities sufficient time to respond to the alarm generated by the initial tampering of the primary mounting strap 715 and corresponding sensing elements, while the offender tracking device continues to remain affixed to the tracked entity or object, and such that the authorities can be summoned to the location of the tracking device prior to the tracking device being completely removed.
Materials for the secondary strap 720 include, but are not limited to, metals, such as hardened steels, Kevlars, layered elastomerics, composites, and other such types of materials both natural and synthetic. Bonding of the secondary strap 720 to the primary strap or the housing may be accomplished by adhesives, rivets, clamps or any suitable combination of the above, or other similar attachment means.
As indicated above, although not shown, the primary mounting strap 715 and the secondary strap 720 may also be encased within a material such as, but not limited to, an elastomeric sheath, wrapping, sprayed materials, or other materials. Such a covering can provide additional comfort to the individual wearing the tracking device and can further help obscure the visibility of the different components of the mounting strap assembly. The various mounting strap components be assembled or extruded together with single system.
Circuitry, including a processor and memory, which are contained within the housing 805 facilitate the location detection, tamper detection, alarm notification, voice communication and the other tracking device functionality, as described above.
In the illustrated embodiment, the mounting strap assembly includes a primary mounting strap 815 having continuity sensing elements positioned between two secondary support straps 820 and 825 which are each composed of a cut resistant material, such as, but not limited to hardened steels, Kevlars, layered elastomerics, composites, and other cut resistant materials.
Preferably, the second and third mounting straps 820 and 825 cannot be cut without also cutting or destroying at least a portion of the mounting strap 815 and/or continuity sensing elements “sandwiched” between or next to the two layers of cut resistant material.
In some embodiments, the second and third mounting straps 820 and 825 are composed of the same material. In other embodiments, the second and third mounting straps 820 and 825 are composed of different materials. For instance, in one embodiment the second mounting strap is composed of a hardened steel band and the interior third mounting strap 825 is composed of a cut resistant fabric like Kevlar or another material. Such an embodiment can, in some instances, increase the comfort of wearing the tracking device. Alternatively, or additionally, all of the mounting straps 815, 820 and 825 can be encased together within a protective covering, such as a rubber or plastic coating, sheath or wrap. In other embodiments, the mounting strap 815 and the two support straps 820 and 825 are extruded together and manufactured as an integral mounting strap assembly.
As indicated above, tampering of the mounting strap assembly will result in the damage of the sensing elements of the detection means and will result in the generation of an alarm. Accordingly, when an offender attempts to remove the tracking device, an alarm will be generated. However, since the second and third support straps 820 and 825 are composed of a cut resistant material and are relatively more durable than the primary mounting strap and sensing elements of the detection means, additional time is required to complete the action of removing the tracking device once the tampering alarm is triggered. This gives authorities sufficient time to respond to the alarm, while the offender tracking device continues to remain affixed, and to be summoned to the location of the tracking device before it can be completely removed.
As indicated above, the secondary support straps can be positioned along any desired portion of the primary support strap. In
Turning now to
In some embodiments, the protective sheath 905 comprises the secondary support strap and is formed in a tubular shape that encases the optical fiber 910. This assembly can be placed alongside a primary mounting strap and/or integrated with the primary mounting strap. Any attempt to break or cut the secondary support strap will break the optical fiber and trigger an alarm. The cut resistant properties of the secondary support strap will prevent the secondary support strap from being completely cut or broken and thereby prevent the tracking device from being removed for a sufficient time after the initial tampering occurs for the authorities to track and apprehend the individual wearing the tracking device.
Materials for the protective sheath 905 include, but are not limited to, metals, such as hardened steels, Kevlars, layered elastomerics, composites, and other such types of materials both natural and synthetic. If the protective sheath 905 is metallic, it can also be separately monitored to sense its continuity.
In some embodiments, the optical fiber is encased in a plurality of different layered materials. For instance, a first layer encasing the optical fiber can be placed between the protective sheath 905 and the optical fiber within space 920. Alternatively, or additionally, at least one additional layer/sheath can be placed around the protective sheath 905. The additional layer that is placed over or under the protective sheath 905 comprises the primary mounting strap in some embodiments.
In view of the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the mounting strap assembly can define the shape of a tubular cable that includes the optical fiber (or alternatively a continuity wire) and the one or more protective layers. In other embodiments, as shown in
One benefit of surrounding, encasing or otherwise protecting the optical fiber with one or more protective support layers, straps or other reinforcing means is that any forces applied to the reinforcing means that would be necessary to sever or break the reinforcing means will apply a corresponding force, such as, but not limited to a compressive/crushing force, a shearing/tearing force, or a leveraging/bending force, to the tamper detection means (e.g., optical fiber, or other continuity sensing element) that is sufficient to create a discontinuity (such as by breaking the optical fiber) and to thereby trigger an alarm prior to the reinforcing means being completely broken. In some embodiments, the reinforcing means are sufficiently strong and durable to remain intact for a sufficient period of time after initial tampering of the mounting strap, which triggers an alarm, for an appropriate authority figure to be notified of the alarm and to arrive at the location where the tracking device is located, prior to the tracking device being completely removed.
In some embodiments, the optical fiber or, alternatively, the continuity wire, is intentionally manufactured and positioned within the mounting assembly in such a manner as to be relatively more fragile than the other elements in the mounting strap and the protective sheath. The optical fiber can also be positioned away from the support straps or other reinforcing means. This way, it is more likely that the optical fiber will be broken and the optical signal will be disrupted during any attempt to remove the offender tracking device by cutting, burning or stretching the mounting strap. Ample time will then be provided to notify the appropriate authorities of the attempted removal of the offender tracking device prior to the offender being able to cut through or remove the mounting straps, cables and/or protective sheaths.
In alternative embodiments, optical fibers or the continuity wires are utilized which have special cut resistant properties, to enhance the structural integrity of the offender tracking device and the mounting strap assembly in particular. The present invention comprehends the fact that the test for continuity can be individually and fully realized by the use of optical fiber (photonic conductivity), or the use of metallic materials (electrical conductivity), or any combination of the above for redundancy.
The mounting strap assembly includes an outer metallic band 1115, a central dielectric band 1120 containing at least an optical fiber for sensing continuity, and an internal metallic band 1125, all of which are connected together and/or to the mounting element(s) 1110 or housing with any of the mechanical or chemical means previously described. Additionally, the mounting strap assembly, including the metallic band(s) 1115 and 1125 may also be encased within another material such as, but not limited to, an elastomeric sheath, wrapping, sprayed materials, or other such material or extruded together within a single system.
The thickness of the outer and inner metallic bands 1115 and 1125 can vary in size. In some embodiments they each have a thickness between about 0.5 and 5 mm. In other embodiments they each have a thickness of between 1 and 3 mm. However, the thicknesses of the two metallic bands can vary from one another, as can their widths. Preferably, the width of each metallic band 1115 and 1125 is narrower than the width of the central dielectric band, although their widths can also be the same. In some embodiments, the width of the metallic bands is within a range of about 6 mm and 25 mm. In other embodiments, the width of the metallic bands is within a range of about 8 mm and 15 mm. Other dimensions can also be used.
The outer and inner metallic bands 1115 and 1125 provide enhanced reinforcement to the mounting strap assembly and can optionally be used to provide electrical continuity via electrical connections 1130 and 1140, respectively, through the mounting elements 1110 and into the electronic shell 1105. The optical fiber from the central dielectric band 1120 also provides optical continuity via an optical connection 1135 through the mounting elements 1110 and into the electronic shell 1105. A continuity wire can also be used with an appropriate electrical transceiver, in combination with, or as a replacement for the optical fiber sensing elements. Thus, each band of the mounting strap can be individually and uniquely monitored for continuity. Should continuity be broken in any one path, it can be sensed via electronics contained with the electronic shell 1105, an alarm generated and communicated to the appropriate data or monitoring center and/or authority figure(s).
When multiple continuity signals are monitored independently, each continuity signal can optionally be tied to a different alarm so as to provide a monitoring system/agent with an ability to detect progressive destruction/removal of the tracking device and to thereby more fully appreciate the urgency associated with certain alarm conditions and even, potentially, a complete removal of the tracking device. In such situations, a responding authority can be informed to be on the lookout for individuals fleeing an area where the tracking device is located. However, it is preferable that the alarm notification for any detected alarm condition is sent to the appropriate authorities before the tracking device can be completely removed.
Gap Protective Flap
In this present embodiment, the mounting strap 1215 also includes an additional cut resistant structure or gap flap 1225 that is affixed to the mounting strap 1215 proximate the housing near each mounting element 1210 location, or in the case of the mounting strap being permanently affixed to the electronic shell 1205, the second cut resistant material 1225 is also permanently mounted at that same location proximate the housing or shell 1205 of the tracking device.
Due to the anatomical nature of the human leg and ankle, where the tracking device is typically worn, a necessarily larger gap between an individual's leg and the mounting strap 1215 may exist near the mounting element(s) 1210 or correspondingly at an area close to where the mounting strap 1215 approaches the electronic shell 1205. By including the gap flap or other cut resistant structure 1225 on each side of the electronic shell 1205, another barrier is created at the location where a gap would otherwise be formed between the mounting strap and the leg or object where the tracking device is mounted, thereby making it more difficult to position a cutting instrument around the mounting strap and further increasing the amount of time required to remove the offender tracking device in an unauthorized manner.
Materials for the cut resistant structure 1225, as with the first and second support straps 1220 and 1230 include, but are not limited to, metals, such as hardened steels, Kevlars, layered elastomerics, composites, and other such types of materials both natural and synthetic. Bonding of the cut resistant structure 1225 and the support straps 1220 and 1230 to the primary mounting strap 1215 and/or the shell 1205 of the tracking device may be accomplished by adhesives, rivets, screws, bolts, clamps other similar chemical or mechanical attachment means or any suitable combination of the above. When the cut resistant structure 1225 and the support straps 1220 and 1230 are metallic, welding may also be a suitable means of attachment.
Additionally, the cut resistant structure 1225 and the support straps 1220 and 1230 may also be enclosed or encased within a material such as, but not limited to an elastomeric sheath, wrapping, sprayed material, or other such material or extruded together within a single system. The mounting strap 1215 and the first, second and third cut resistant materials 1220, 1230 and 1225 may also be surrounded, at least in part, by an external layer.
Turning now to
The reflective strip 1420 can be affixed to the mounting strap with an adhesive or mechanical fastener. One or more other reflective elements (not shown) can also be affixed to the shell 1405 in addition to or instead of the mounting strap.
Other detection means can also be used in combination with or without the reflective strip. For instance, an audible alarm, such as a constant sound or periodic beep, can be used and activated once the mounting strap has been tampered with or removed (such as by detection of a loss of signal continuity (electrical or optical), as described above. This audible alarm can be emitted from a speaker operably coupled to the offender tracking device. In other embodiments a visual alarm is activated, such as with a pulsing or constant light source, in response to a detected loss of signal continuity with any of the mounting strap elements described above. The light source can be disposed on any portion of the offender tracking device. In some embodiments, the light source is a low power LED light source that will continue to operate for several hours, thereby providing ample time to detect the device, even if the device is hidden or obscured in a dark location.
Other detection means can also be used in combination with or without the reflective strip. For instance, an audible alarm, such as a constant sound or periodic beep, can be used and activated once the mounting strap has been tampered with or removed, (such as by detection of a loss of signal continuity (electrical or optical), as described above. This audible alarm can be emitted from a speaker operably coupled to the offender tracking device. In other embodiments a visual alarm is activated, such as with a pulsing or constant light source, in response to a detected loss of signal continuity with any of the mounting strap elements described above. The light source can be disposed on any portion of the offender tracking device. In some embodiments, the light source is a low power LED light source that will continue to operate for several hours, thereby providing ample time to detect the device, even if the device is hidden or obscured in a dark location.
This U.S. patent application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/321,788, filed Apr. 7, 2010, and entitled “SECURE STRAP MOUNTING SYSTEM FOR AN OFFENDER TRACKING DEVICE”. The foregoing provisional patent application is incorporated herein by specific reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2986543 | Daniel | May 1961 | A |
3210747 | Clynes | Oct 1965 | A |
3440633 | Vinding | Apr 1969 | A |
3462692 | Bartlett | Aug 1969 | A |
3478344 | Schwitzgebel | Nov 1969 | A |
3568161 | Knickel | Mar 1971 | A |
3572316 | Vogelman | Mar 1971 | A |
3609741 | Miller | Sep 1971 | A |
3639907 | Greatbatch | Feb 1972 | A |
3656456 | Stigmark | Apr 1972 | A |
3665448 | McGlinchey | May 1972 | A |
3743865 | Riechmann | Jul 1973 | A |
3758855 | Meyer | Sep 1973 | A |
3764819 | Muller | Oct 1973 | A |
3876890 | Brown | Apr 1975 | A |
3882277 | DePedro | May 1975 | A |
3898472 | Long | Aug 1975 | A |
3898984 | Mandel | Aug 1975 | A |
3914692 | Seaborn | Oct 1975 | A |
3925763 | Wadhwani | Dec 1975 | A |
3930249 | Steck | Dec 1975 | A |
3972320 | Kalman | Aug 1976 | A |
3973208 | Diamond | Aug 1976 | A |
3983483 | Pando | Sep 1976 | A |
4095214 | Minasy | Jun 1978 | A |
4110741 | Hubert | Aug 1978 | A |
4157540 | Oros | Jun 1979 | A |
4234840 | Konrad | Nov 1980 | A |
4237344 | Moore | Dec 1980 | A |
4258709 | Flack | Mar 1981 | A |
4259665 | Manning | Mar 1981 | A |
4275385 | White | Jun 1981 | A |
4293852 | Rogers | Oct 1981 | A |
4295132 | Burney | Oct 1981 | A |
4309697 | Weaver | Jan 1982 | A |
4316134 | Balan | Feb 1982 | A |
4319241 | Mount | Mar 1982 | A |
4331161 | Patel | May 1982 | A |
4342986 | Buskirk | Aug 1982 | A |
4359733 | O'Neill | Nov 1982 | A |
4445118 | Taylor | Apr 1984 | A |
4446454 | Pyle | May 1984 | A |
4523184 | Abel | Jun 1985 | A |
4536755 | Holzgang | Aug 1985 | A |
4549169 | Moura | Oct 1985 | A |
4558309 | Antonevich | Dec 1985 | A |
4559526 | Tani | Dec 1985 | A |
4578539 | Townsing | Mar 1986 | A |
4591661 | Benedetto | May 1986 | A |
4596988 | Wanka | Jun 1986 | A |
4598272 | Cox | Jul 1986 | A |
4598275 | Ross | Jul 1986 | A |
4622544 | Bially | Nov 1986 | A |
4630035 | Stahl | Dec 1986 | A |
4651157 | Gray | Mar 1987 | A |
4665370 | Holland | May 1987 | A |
4665385 | Henderson | May 1987 | A |
4665387 | Cooper | May 1987 | A |
4667203 | Counselman | May 1987 | A |
4673936 | Kotoh | Jun 1987 | A |
4675656 | Narcisse | Jun 1987 | A |
4682155 | Shirley | Jul 1987 | A |
4701760 | Raoux | Oct 1987 | A |
4728959 | Maloney | Mar 1988 | A |
4731613 | Endo | Mar 1988 | A |
4736196 | McMahon | Apr 1988 | A |
4737976 | Borth | Apr 1988 | A |
4740792 | Sagey | Apr 1988 | A |
4741245 | Malone | May 1988 | A |
4742336 | Hall | May 1988 | A |
4742357 | Rackley | May 1988 | A |
4747120 | Foley | May 1988 | A |
4750197 | Denekamp | Jun 1988 | A |
4751512 | Longaker | Jun 1988 | A |
4754283 | Fowler | Jun 1988 | A |
4754465 | Trimble | Jun 1988 | A |
4764757 | DeMarco | Aug 1988 | A |
4777477 | Watson | Oct 1988 | A |
4791572 | Green | Dec 1988 | A |
4809005 | Counselman | Feb 1989 | A |
4812823 | Dickerson | Mar 1989 | A |
4812991 | Hatch | Mar 1989 | A |
4819053 | Halavais | Apr 1989 | A |
4819162 | Webb | Apr 1989 | A |
4819860 | Hargrove | Apr 1989 | A |
4820966 | Fridman | Apr 1989 | A |
4825457 | Lebowitz | Apr 1989 | A |
4833477 | Tendler | May 1989 | A |
4837568 | Snaper | Jun 1989 | A |
4843377 | Fuller | Jun 1989 | A |
4864277 | Goodman | Sep 1989 | A |
4885571 | Pauley | Dec 1989 | A |
4888716 | Ueno | Dec 1989 | A |
4891650 | Sheffer | Jan 1990 | A |
4891761 | Gray | Jan 1990 | A |
4894662 | Counselman | Jan 1990 | A |
4897642 | Dilullo | Jan 1990 | A |
4903212 | Yokouchi | Feb 1990 | A |
4907290 | Crompton | Mar 1990 | A |
4908629 | Apsell | Mar 1990 | A |
4912756 | Hop | Mar 1990 | A |
4916435 | Fuller | Apr 1990 | A |
4918425 | Greenberg | Apr 1990 | A |
4918432 | Pauley | Apr 1990 | A |
4924699 | Kuroda | May 1990 | A |
4928107 | Kuroda | May 1990 | A |
4952913 | Pauley | Aug 1990 | A |
4952928 | Carroll | Aug 1990 | A |
4953198 | Daly | Aug 1990 | A |
4956861 | Kondo | Sep 1990 | A |
4961212 | Marui | Oct 1990 | A |
4965548 | Fayfield | Oct 1990 | A |
4980671 | McCurdy | Dec 1990 | A |
4983980 | Ando | Jan 1991 | A |
4993061 | Hsieh | Feb 1991 | A |
4996161 | Conners | Feb 1991 | A |
4999613 | Williamson | Mar 1991 | A |
5003317 | Gray | Mar 1991 | A |
5003595 | Collins | Mar 1991 | A |
5008930 | Gawrys | Apr 1991 | A |
5014040 | Weaver | May 1991 | A |
5014066 | Counselman | May 1991 | A |
5014206 | Scribner | May 1991 | A |
5019802 | Brittain | May 1991 | A |
5019828 | Schoolman | May 1991 | A |
5021794 | Lawrence | Jun 1991 | A |
5023904 | Kaplan | Jun 1991 | A |
5025253 | Dilullo | Jun 1991 | A |
5025261 | Ohta | Jun 1991 | A |
5032823 | Bower | Jul 1991 | A |
5032845 | Velasco | Jul 1991 | A |
5043736 | Darnell | Aug 1991 | A |
5055851 | Sheffer | Oct 1991 | A |
5075670 | Bower | Dec 1991 | A |
5077788 | Cook | Dec 1991 | A |
5081667 | Drori | Jan 1992 | A |
5115223 | Moody | May 1992 | A |
5117222 | McCurdy | May 1992 | A |
5119102 | Barnard | Jun 1992 | A |
5131020 | Liebesny | Jul 1992 | A |
5146207 | Henry | Sep 1992 | A |
5146231 | Ghaem | Sep 1992 | A |
5148471 | Metroka | Sep 1992 | A |
5148473 | Freeland | Sep 1992 | A |
5155689 | Wortham | Oct 1992 | A |
5170426 | D'Alessio | Dec 1992 | A |
5179519 | Adachi | Jan 1993 | A |
5182543 | Siegel | Jan 1993 | A |
5193215 | Olmer | Mar 1993 | A |
5198831 | Burrell | Mar 1993 | A |
5203009 | Bogusz | Apr 1993 | A |
5204670 | Stinton | Apr 1993 | A |
5206897 | Goudreau | Apr 1993 | A |
5218344 | Ricketts | Jun 1993 | A |
5218367 | Sheffer | Jun 1993 | A |
5220509 | Takemura | Jun 1993 | A |
5223844 | Mansell | Jun 1993 | A |
5225842 | Brown | Jul 1993 | A |
5235320 | Romano | Aug 1993 | A |
5235633 | Dennison | Aug 1993 | A |
5243652 | Teare | Sep 1993 | A |
5247564 | Zicker | Sep 1993 | A |
5255183 | Katz | Oct 1993 | A |
5255306 | Melton | Oct 1993 | A |
5257195 | Hirata | Oct 1993 | A |
5266944 | Carroll | Nov 1993 | A |
5266958 | Durboraw | Nov 1993 | A |
5268845 | Startup | Dec 1993 | A |
5274695 | Green | Dec 1993 | A |
5278539 | Lauterbach | Jan 1994 | A |
5297186 | Dong | Mar 1994 | A |
5298884 | Gilmore | Mar 1994 | A |
5299132 | Wortham | Mar 1994 | A |
5305370 | Kearns | Apr 1994 | A |
5307277 | Hirano | Apr 1994 | A |
5311197 | Sorden | May 1994 | A |
5311374 | Oh | May 1994 | A |
5317309 | Vercellotti | May 1994 | A |
5317620 | Smith | May 1994 | A |
5319374 | Desai | Jun 1994 | A |
5319698 | Glidewell | Jun 1994 | A |
5334974 | Simms | Aug 1994 | A |
5334986 | Fernhout | Aug 1994 | A |
5349530 | Odagawa | Sep 1994 | A |
5353376 | Oh | Oct 1994 | A |
5355140 | Slavin | Oct 1994 | A |
5357560 | Nykerk | Oct 1994 | A |
5365451 | Wang | Nov 1994 | A |
5365570 | Boubelik | Nov 1994 | A |
5367524 | Rideout | Nov 1994 | A |
5369699 | Page | Nov 1994 | A |
5374933 | Kao | Dec 1994 | A |
5377256 | Franklin | Dec 1994 | A |
5379224 | Brown | Jan 1995 | A |
5388147 | Grimes | Feb 1995 | A |
5389934 | Kass | Feb 1995 | A |
5392052 | Eberwine | Feb 1995 | A |
5394333 | Kao | Feb 1995 | A |
5396227 | Carroll | Mar 1995 | A |
5396516 | Padovani | Mar 1995 | A |
5396540 | Gooch | Mar 1995 | A |
5398190 | Wortham | Mar 1995 | A |
5402466 | Delahanty | Mar 1995 | A |
5416468 | Baumann | May 1995 | A |
5416695 | Stutman | May 1995 | A |
5416808 | Witsaman | May 1995 | A |
5418537 | Bird | May 1995 | A |
5422816 | Sprague | Jun 1995 | A |
5426425 | Conrad | Jun 1995 | A |
5428546 | Shah | Jun 1995 | A |
5430656 | Dekel | Jul 1995 | A |
5437278 | Wilk | Aug 1995 | A |
5438315 | Nix | Aug 1995 | A |
5444430 | Mcshane | Aug 1995 | A |
5448221 | Weller | Sep 1995 | A |
5451948 | Jekel | Sep 1995 | A |
5461365 | Schlager | Oct 1995 | A |
5461390 | Hoshen | Oct 1995 | A |
5465388 | Zicker | Nov 1995 | A |
5475751 | McMonagle | Dec 1995 | A |
5479149 | Pike | Dec 1995 | A |
5479479 | Braitberg | Dec 1995 | A |
5479482 | Grimes | Dec 1995 | A |
5485385 | Mitsugi | Jan 1996 | A |
5490200 | Snyder | Feb 1996 | A |
5493692 | Theimer | Feb 1996 | A |
5493694 | Vlcek | Feb 1996 | A |
5497148 | Olivia | Mar 1996 | A |
5497149 | Fast | Mar 1996 | A |
5504482 | Schreder | Apr 1996 | A |
5510797 | Abraham | Apr 1996 | A |
5512879 | Stokes | Apr 1996 | A |
5513111 | Wortham | Apr 1996 | A |
5515043 | Bernard | May 1996 | A |
5515062 | Maine | May 1996 | A |
5515285 | Garrett | May 1996 | A |
5517419 | Lanckton | May 1996 | A |
5518402 | Tommarello | May 1996 | A |
5519380 | Edwards | May 1996 | A |
5519403 | Bickley | May 1996 | A |
5519621 | Wortham | May 1996 | A |
5523740 | Burgmann | Jun 1996 | A |
5525967 | Azizi | Jun 1996 | A |
5525969 | LaDue | Jun 1996 | A |
5528248 | Steiner | Jun 1996 | A |
5532690 | Hertel | Jul 1996 | A |
5537102 | Pinnow | Jul 1996 | A |
5541845 | Klein | Jul 1996 | A |
5542100 | Hatakeyama | Jul 1996 | A |
5543780 | Mcauley | Aug 1996 | A |
5544661 | Davis | Aug 1996 | A |
5546445 | Dennison | Aug 1996 | A |
5550551 | Alesio | Aug 1996 | A |
5552772 | Janky | Sep 1996 | A |
5555286 | Tendler | Sep 1996 | A |
5557254 | Johnson | Sep 1996 | A |
5559491 | Stadler | Sep 1996 | A |
5559497 | Hong | Sep 1996 | A |
5563931 | Bishop | Oct 1996 | A |
5568119 | Schnipper | Oct 1996 | A |
5572204 | Timm | Nov 1996 | A |
5572217 | Flawn | Nov 1996 | A |
5574649 | Levy | Nov 1996 | A |
5576716 | Sadler | Nov 1996 | A |
5587715 | Lewis | Dec 1996 | A |
5588038 | Snyder | Dec 1996 | A |
5589834 | Weinberg | Dec 1996 | A |
5594425 | Ladner | Jan 1997 | A |
5594650 | Shah | Jan 1997 | A |
5596262 | Boll | Jan 1997 | A |
5596313 | Berglund | Jan 1997 | A |
5598151 | Torii | Jan 1997 | A |
5600230 | Dunstan | Feb 1997 | A |
5602739 | Haagenstad | Feb 1997 | A |
5612675 | Jennings | Mar 1997 | A |
5617317 | Ignagni | Apr 1997 | A |
5621388 | Sherburne | Apr 1997 | A |
5625668 | Loomis | Apr 1997 | A |
5627520 | Grubbs | May 1997 | A |
5627548 | Woo | May 1997 | A |
5629693 | Janky | May 1997 | A |
5630206 | Urban | May 1997 | A |
5644317 | Weston | Jul 1997 | A |
5646593 | Hughes | Jul 1997 | A |
5650770 | Schlager | Jul 1997 | A |
5652570 | Lepkofker | Jul 1997 | A |
5673035 | Huang | Sep 1997 | A |
5673305 | Ross | Sep 1997 | A |
5677521 | Garrou | Oct 1997 | A |
5682133 | Johnson | Oct 1997 | A |
5682142 | Loosmore | Oct 1997 | A |
5684828 | Bolan | Nov 1997 | A |
5686910 | Timm | Nov 1997 | A |
5686924 | Trimble | Nov 1997 | A |
5687215 | Timm | Nov 1997 | A |
5694452 | Bertolet | Dec 1997 | A |
5699256 | Shibuya | Dec 1997 | A |
5703598 | Emmons | Dec 1997 | A |
5705980 | Shapiro | Jan 1998 | A |
5712619 | Simkin | Jan 1998 | A |
5715277 | Goodson | Feb 1998 | A |
5721678 | Widl | Feb 1998 | A |
5722081 | Tamura | Feb 1998 | A |
5722418 | Bro | Mar 1998 | A |
5724316 | Brunts | Mar 1998 | A |
5726893 | Schuchman | Mar 1998 | A |
5727057 | Emery | Mar 1998 | A |
5731757 | Layson | Mar 1998 | A |
5732076 | Ketseoglou | Mar 1998 | A |
5736962 | Tendler | Apr 1998 | A |
5740049 | Kaise | Apr 1998 | A |
5740532 | Fernandez | Apr 1998 | A |
5740547 | Kull | Apr 1998 | A |
5742233 | Hoffman | Apr 1998 | A |
5742509 | Goldberg | Apr 1998 | A |
5742666 | Alpert | Apr 1998 | A |
5742686 | Finley | Apr 1998 | A |
5742904 | Pinder | Apr 1998 | A |
5745037 | Guthrie | Apr 1998 | A |
5745849 | Britton | Apr 1998 | A |
5745868 | Geier | Apr 1998 | A |
5748089 | Sizemore | May 1998 | A |
5748148 | Heiser | May 1998 | A |
5751246 | Hertel | May 1998 | A |
5752976 | Duffin | May 1998 | A |
5757367 | Kapoor | May 1998 | A |
5760692 | Block | Jun 1998 | A |
5767788 | Ness | Jun 1998 | A |
5771002 | Creek | Jun 1998 | A |
5774825 | Reynolds | Jun 1998 | A |
5777580 | Janky | Jul 1998 | A |
5781101 | Stephen | Jul 1998 | A |
5784029 | Geier | Jul 1998 | A |
5786789 | Janky | Jul 1998 | A |
5790022 | Delvecchio | Aug 1998 | A |
5790974 | Tognazzini | Aug 1998 | A |
5793283 | Davis | Aug 1998 | A |
5793630 | Theimer | Aug 1998 | A |
5794174 | Janky | Aug 1998 | A |
5796613 | Kato | Aug 1998 | A |
5796777 | Terlep | Aug 1998 | A |
5797091 | Clise | Aug 1998 | A |
5805055 | Colizza | Sep 1998 | A |
5809426 | Radojevic | Sep 1998 | A |
5809520 | Edwards | Sep 1998 | A |
5811886 | Majmudar | Sep 1998 | A |
5815118 | Schipper | Sep 1998 | A |
5818333 | Yaffe | Oct 1998 | A |
5819864 | Koike | Oct 1998 | A |
5825283 | Camhi | Oct 1998 | A |
5825327 | Krasner | Oct 1998 | A |
5825871 | Mark | Oct 1998 | A |
5828292 | Kokhan | Oct 1998 | A |
5831535 | Reisman | Nov 1998 | A |
5835017 | Ohkura | Nov 1998 | A |
5835907 | Newman | Nov 1998 | A |
5842146 | Shishido | Nov 1998 | A |
5844894 | Dent | Dec 1998 | A |
5847679 | Yee | Dec 1998 | A |
5852401 | Kita | Dec 1998 | A |
5857433 | Files | Jan 1999 | A |
5867103 | Taylor | Feb 1999 | A |
5868100 | Marsh | Feb 1999 | A |
5873040 | Dunn | Feb 1999 | A |
5874801 | Kobayashi | Feb 1999 | A |
5874889 | Higdon | Feb 1999 | A |
5875402 | Yamawaki | Feb 1999 | A |
5877724 | Davis | Mar 1999 | A |
5889474 | LaDue | Mar 1999 | A |
5890061 | Timm | Mar 1999 | A |
5890092 | Kato | Mar 1999 | A |
5892447 | Wilkinson | Apr 1999 | A |
5892454 | Schipper | Apr 1999 | A |
5892825 | Mages | Apr 1999 | A |
5894498 | Kotzin | Apr 1999 | A |
5898391 | Jefferies | Apr 1999 | A |
5900734 | Munson | May 1999 | A |
5905461 | Neher | May 1999 | A |
5906655 | Fan | May 1999 | A |
5907555 | Raith | May 1999 | A |
5912623 | Pierson | Jun 1999 | A |
5912886 | Takahashi | Jun 1999 | A |
5912921 | Warren | Jun 1999 | A |
5914675 | Tognazzini | Jun 1999 | A |
5917405 | Joao | Jun 1999 | A |
5918180 | Dimino | Jun 1999 | A |
5918183 | Janky | Jun 1999 | A |
5919239 | Fraker | Jul 1999 | A |
5920278 | Tyler | Jul 1999 | A |
5926086 | Escareno | Jul 1999 | A |
5928306 | France | Jul 1999 | A |
5929752 | Janky | Jul 1999 | A |
5929753 | Montague | Jul 1999 | A |
5933080 | Nojima | Aug 1999 | A |
5936529 | Reisman | Aug 1999 | A |
5936530 | Meinhold | Aug 1999 | A |
5937164 | Mages | Aug 1999 | A |
5940004 | Fulton | Aug 1999 | A |
5940439 | Kleider | Aug 1999 | A |
5945906 | Onuma | Aug 1999 | A |
5945944 | Krasner | Aug 1999 | A |
5948043 | Mathis | Sep 1999 | A |
5949350 | Girard | Sep 1999 | A |
5959533 | Layson | Sep 1999 | A |
5963130 | Schlager | Oct 1999 | A |
5966079 | Tanguay | Oct 1999 | A |
5969600 | Tanguay | Oct 1999 | A |
5969673 | Bickley | Oct 1999 | A |
5982281 | Layson | Nov 1999 | A |
5982813 | Dutta | Nov 1999 | A |
5983115 | Mizikovsky | Nov 1999 | A |
5990785 | Suda | Nov 1999 | A |
5990793 | Bieback | Nov 1999 | A |
5991637 | Mack | Nov 1999 | A |
5995847 | Gergen | Nov 1999 | A |
5997476 | Brown | Dec 1999 | A |
5999124 | Sheynblat | Dec 1999 | A |
6009363 | Beckert | Dec 1999 | A |
6011510 | Yee | Jan 2000 | A |
6014080 | Layson | Jan 2000 | A |
6014555 | Tendler | Jan 2000 | A |
6018667 | Ghosh | Jan 2000 | A |
6025774 | Forbes | Feb 2000 | A |
6025779 | Huang | Feb 2000 | A |
6026125 | Larrick | Feb 2000 | A |
6026300 | Hicks | Feb 2000 | A |
6026345 | Shah | Feb 2000 | A |
6028551 | Schoen | Feb 2000 | A |
6029111 | Croyle | Feb 2000 | A |
6031454 | Lovejoy | Feb 2000 | A |
6031460 | Banks | Feb 2000 | A |
6034622 | Levine | Mar 2000 | A |
6035201 | Whitehead | Mar 2000 | A |
6035217 | Kravitz | Mar 2000 | A |
6044257 | Boling | Mar 2000 | A |
6046687 | Janky | Apr 2000 | A |
6047196 | Makela | Apr 2000 | A |
6054928 | Lemelson | Apr 2000 | A |
6055426 | Beasley | Apr 2000 | A |
6060982 | Holtrop | May 2000 | A |
6061018 | Sheynblat | May 2000 | A |
6061392 | Bremer | May 2000 | A |
6061561 | Alanara | May 2000 | A |
6069570 | Herring | May 2000 | A |
6072396 | Gaukel | Jun 2000 | A |
6075797 | Thomas | Jun 2000 | A |
6075821 | Kao | Jun 2000 | A |
6084510 | Lemelson | Jul 2000 | A |
6084906 | Kao | Jul 2000 | A |
6084917 | Kao | Jul 2000 | A |
6088387 | Gelblum | Jul 2000 | A |
6088586 | Haverty | Jul 2000 | A |
6091325 | Zur | Jul 2000 | A |
6091786 | Chen | Jul 2000 | A |
6091957 | Larkins | Jul 2000 | A |
6094140 | Parente | Jul 2000 | A |
6097337 | Bisio | Aug 2000 | A |
6100806 | Gaukel | Aug 2000 | A |
6115597 | Kroll | Sep 2000 | A |
6130620 | Pinnow | Oct 2000 | A |
6160481 | Taylor | Dec 2000 | A |
6181253 | Eschenbach | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198394 | Jacobsen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198914 | Saegusa | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218945 | Taylor | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226510 | Boling | May 2001 | B1 |
6232916 | Grillo | May 2001 | B1 |
6236319 | Pitzer | May 2001 | B1 |
6239700 | Hoffman | May 2001 | B1 |
6262666 | Lodichand | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285867 | Boling | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313733 | Kyte | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6356841 | Hamrick | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362778 | Neher | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6405213 | Layson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6437696 | Lemelson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6518889 | Schlager | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6580908 | Kroll | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6636732 | Boling | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639516 | Copley | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639519 | Drummond | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6646617 | Gaukel | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6671351 | Menard | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674368 | Hawkins | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6675006 | Diaz | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687497 | Parvulescu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6703936 | Hill | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6762684 | Camhi | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765991 | Hanuschak | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766159 | Lindholm | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774797 | Freathy | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782208 | Lundholm | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6847892 | Zhou | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859650 | Ritter | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6912399 | Zirul | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6972684 | Copley | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6992582 | Hill et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7002477 | Camhi | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7015817 | Copley | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7026929 | Wallace | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7038590 | Hoffman | May 2006 | B2 |
7042338 | Weber | May 2006 | B1 |
7061399 | Leck | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7092695 | Boling | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7106191 | Liberati | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7119690 | Lerch et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123141 | Contestabile | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7251471 | Boling | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7289031 | Hock | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7330122 | Derrick | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7446656 | Blakeway | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7545318 | Derrick | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20020084904 | De La Huerga | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020115436 | Howell | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030027547 | Wade | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030107487 | Korman | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030197612 | Tanaka | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050193104 | Mason | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060047543 | Moses | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070023496 | Hall | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041427 | Small | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070082677 | Hart | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070258417 | Harvey | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080012760 | Derrick | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018458 | Derrick | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018459 | Derrick | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080096521 | Boling | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080174422 | Freathy | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080218358 | Derrick | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080316022 | Buck | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090174550 | Aninye et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090224909 | Derrick | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100052916 | Canora et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4413974 | Nov 1995 | DE |
19625581 | Dec 1997 | DE |
0017448 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0242099 | Oct 1987 | EP |
0489915 | Jun 1992 | EP |
496538 | Jul 1992 | EP |
745867 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0780993 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0809117 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0889631 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0946037 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1363258 | Nov 2003 | EP |
2141006 | Dec 1984 | GB |
2007200 | Jan 1990 | JP |
6020191 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6036185 | Feb 1994 | JP |
38838 | Oct 2005 | RE |
39909 | Nov 2007 | RE |
WO 87-004851 | Aug 1987 | WO |
WO 87-06713 | Nov 1987 | WO |
WO 9300663 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 97-03511 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 00-077688 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0173466 | Oct 2001 | WO |
PCTUS2006030432 | Aug 2007 | WO |
PCTUS2007072736 | Jan 2008 | WO |
PCTUS2007072743 | Jan 2008 | WO |
PCTUS2007072740 | Apr 2008 | WO |
PCTUS2007072746 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/399,151, Dec. 30, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,989, Dec. 13, 2011, Office Action. |
John H Murphy et al., “Advanced Electronic Monitoring for Tracking Persons on Probation or Parole: Final Report”, Grumman STC, Feb. 1996. |
D. Evans, “Electronic Monitoring: Testimony to Ontario's Standing Committee on Administration of Justice”, Perspectives, Fall 1996, pp. 8-10. |
Albert et al., “GIS/GPS in Law Enforcement Master Bibliography”, Nov. 2000. |
M. Anderson (Editor), “GPS Used to Track Criminals”, GIS World, Aug. 1996, p. 15. |
B. Clede, “Radio Computers Locate Places, and Plot Them on a Map, Too”, Law and Order, Oct. 1994, <http://www.clede.com/Articles/Police/gps.htm>. |
G.W. Brown Jr., “What Impact Will Personal Position Location Technology Have Upon the Management and Administation of Mid-Sized Law Enforcement Organizations by the Year 2000?”, California Commission of Peace Officer Standards and Training, Sacramento, California, Jul. 1994. |
D. Anderson et al., “Seattle and Tacoma PDs Automated Crime Analysis”, The Journal, National FOP Journal, Spring 1990. |
B. Wise, “Catching Crooks with Computers”, American City and Country, May 1995, pp. 54-62. |
M. Alexander et al., “An Automated System for the identification and Prioritization of Rape Suspects”, SDSS for Rape Suspect Identification, http://www.esri.com/library/userconf/proc97/proc97/to350/pap333.htm, Jul. 2001. |
L. Pilant, “Spotlight on . . . High-Technology Solutions”, From Police Chief, Document #54650, May 1996. |
M. Lyew, “A New Weapon for Fighting Crime”, American Probation and Parole Association, “Electronic Monitoring”, 1996, <http://www.appa-net.org/about%20appa/electron.htm. |
Hoshen, J.; Sennott, J.; Winkler, M. “Keeping tabs on criminals [electronic monitoring]” Spectrum, IEEE, vol. 32, Issue 2, Feb 1995, pp. 26-32. |
National Center for Juvenile Justice. (1991). Desktop guide to good juvenile probation practice, Pittsburgh, PA: Author. |
Davis, S. (1986). Evaluation of the First Year of Expanded House Arrest, Oct. 1, 1984-Sep. 30, 1985: Oklahoma Department of Corrections. |
Jones, R K., Wiliszowski, C. H., & Lacey, J. H. (1996). Evaluation of Alternative Programs for Repeat DWI Offenders (Report prepared by Mid-America Research Institute No. DOT HS 808 493). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Office of Program Development and Evaluation. |
Nieto, M. (1996). Community correction Punishments: An Alternative to Incarceration for Nonviolent Offenders, Sacramento, California Research Bureau. |
Reconnecting Youth & Community: A Youth Development Approach. (1996). Washington, DC: Family and Youth Services Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. |
Whitfield, D. Tackling the Tag: The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders. Winchester, U.K.: Waterside Press, 1997. (Books). |
Torbet, P. M. (1997). Automated information systems in juvenile probation. In D. W. Thomas & P. M. Torbet (Eds.), Juvenile probation administrator's desktop guide (pp. 81-89). Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice. |
Spaans, E. C., & Verwers, C. (1997), Electronic monitoring in the Netherlands: results of the experiment. The Hague, Netherlands: Ministry of Justice. |
Church, A., & Dunstan, S. (1997). Home Detention: the Evaluation of the Home Detention Pilot Program 1995-1997. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Justice. |
Canada. Solicitor General Canada, Annual Report on the Use of Electronic Surveillance as Required Under Subsection 195(1) of the Criminal Code. Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada, 1991-1994. (Book). |
Schwitzgebel, R. L., & Bird, R. M. (1970). Sociotechnical design factors in remote instrumentation with humans in natural environments. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 2(3),99-105. |
Gould, L. A., & Archambault, W. G. (1995). Evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Monitoring (CAMO) Project: Some Measurement Issues. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 19(2), 255-273. |
Gable, R. K. (1986). Application of personal telemonitoring to current problems in corrections. Journal of Criminal Justice, 14 (2),167-176. |
Mainprize, S. (1996). Elective Affinities in the Engineering of Social Control: The Evolution of Electronic Monitoring. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 2(2), 26. |
Charles, Michael T. “The Development of a Juvenile Electronic Monitoring Program.” Federal Probation, vol. 53 (1989), 3-12. |
Huskey, B. L. (1987). Electronic Monitoring: an Evolving Alternative, Perspectives, 11(3), 19-23. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,088, May 13, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,992, Jun. 9, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,992, Jan. 22, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,989, Feb. 4, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,989, Jul. 29, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,989, Jan. 26, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,976, May 22, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,976, Oct. 2, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,976, Jan. 28, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,976, Jul. 20, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,991, Dec. 12, 2007, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,991, Jul, 7, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,991, Feb. 27, 2009, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/830,398, Dec. 11, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/830,398, Aug. 19, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,992, Sep. 18, 2009, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,992, Dec. 29, 2009, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,976, Dec. 21, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,088, Jan. 11, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,989, Feb. 23, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,088, Apr. 16, 2010, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,989, Dec. 21, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,989, May 24, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,976, Jan. 6, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,572, Mar. 3, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/875,988, Jun. 10, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,572, filed Jun. 2, 2010, Derrick. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/875,988, filed Sep. 3, 2010, Derrick. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,989, Jul. 28, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,572, Oct. 6, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,976, Oct. 28, 2010, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/875,988, Nov. 16, 2010, Office Action. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110248853 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61321788 | Apr 2010 | US |