1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a system and method for automatically determining the status of a traffic control signal and more particularly the invention relates to a system for monitoring and recording the status of a traffic signal by observing the light emitted from one or more traffic lights and using the resultant information as input to a traffic monitoring system in a controlled intersection.
2. Background of the Invention
Installing a red light photo-enforcement system in an intersection involves digging the road and pavement in order to install cables for interfacing the violation detecting/recording system with the traffic light controller for synchronization. This requirement makes the red light photo-enforcement system a permanent installation for a specific approach at an intersection. The disclosed invention eliminates the need for a cable connection between a light controller and a photo-enforcement system in order to communicate the status of the traffic signal. The state of the traffic signal can be determined remotely by using an optical system coupled to individual detectors or a CCD (charge-coupled device) image recorder as a remote traffic light sensor.
The disclosed system eliminates the installation costs associated with interfacing the traffic signal controller with Red Light Camera applications. In conjunction with non-intrusive speed estimation technologies (such as laser or video speed sensors), the remote sensor system makes possible the development of a fully transportable photo-enforcement system. This is a significant development for smaller municipalities and police departments who cannot afford to install photo-enforcement systems in many intersections.
Implementing a removable photo-enforcement system helps improve the efficiency of documenting red light violators. Another advantage of the disclosed remote system working in combination with a red-light photo-enforcement system is that the decision making process is based on exactly what a driver sees upon entering an intersection. If, for any reason, a traffic light is broken or hidden, and the driver cannot determine the state of the traffic light, neither will the sensor. In addition, immediate information about a light malfunction may be communicated to a control office, enabling immediate action to fix the light and/or dispatch personnel, thus increasing the safety of the intersection.
Another advantage of a transportable photo-enforcement red light system is the element of surprise to red light violators. In other words, when drivers realize that an intersection has been instrumented they tend to stop violating and the municipalities may lose money.
The above and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention are considered in more detail, in relation to the following description of embodiments thereof shown in the accompanying drawings, in which:
The invention summarized above and defined by the enumerated claims may be better understood by referring to the following description, which should be read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. This description of an embodiment, set out below to enable one to build and use an implementation of the invention, is not intended to limit the invention, but to serve as a particular example thereof. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that they may readily use the conception and specific embodiments disclosed as a basis for modifying or designing other methods and systems for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. Those skilled in the art should also realize that such equivalent assemblies do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention in its broadest form.
Referring now to the figures, the basic principle of operation of the disclosed sensor system is illustrated in
An optical arrangement of a remote traffic light status sensor is shown in
Optical radiation from the traffic light is filtered by bandpass filters and is incident on only one of the lenses (since only one filter will allow light of a desired wavelength to pass through). The pass bands of the individual filters depend on the type of lights used in the signal device. In the case of LED (Light Emitting Diode) lights, a narrower bandpass filter can be used since the emission wavelength of LED lights is narrower as compared with traditional incandescent lights. The lens focuses the collected light onto a detector corresponding to a predetermined detected color and an electrical output is generated. The traffic signal status is determined according to which detector generates the output and the traffic signal status is communicated to one or more interfaced controllers.
Data collected and processed by the remote sensor system can generate useful information concerning the traffic signal under surveillance. Inspection of the traffic signal timing sequence can reveal whether the traffic signal is operated according to the rules and regulations of the local government.
In some embodiments, it is not necessary to employ three detectors. Other embodiments of the remote traffic light status sensor are shown in
Instead of using individual detectors, lenses, and filters to determine the state of the traffic light, the disclosed system can be constructed using a single lens and a color video CCD detector or a multi element position sensitive detector (PSD). This system is schematically shown in
In an alternate embodiment, the narrowband filter is placed between the lens and the detector resulting in a smaller filter size. This option, shown in
Detection of the light status using the setup shown in
As shown in
The algorithm shown in
The system is specifically useful for Red-Light Camera violation detection. In operation, the speed of passing vehicles is estimated using a traffic sensor system and the status of the traffic light is detected by the remote traffic light sensor system described herein. In a preferred embodiment, the remote traffic light sensor system is located in the same housing as the recording media, which may be a digital camera or other appropriate recording device. The remote traffic light status system provides input to a controller/CPU in the violation detection system about the traffic signal status. This input together with speed estimated provided by the traffic sensor system is used to make a decision whether a violation is about to occur. If a violation is likely, the controller/CPU initiates a series of recordings for documenting the violation.
The invention has been described with references to a preferred embodiment. While specific values, relationships, materials and steps have been set forth for purposes of describing concepts of the invention, it will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the basic concepts and operating principles of the invention as broadly described. It should be recognized that, in the light of the above teachings, those skilled in the art can modify those specifics without departing from the invention taught herein. Having now fully set forth the preferred embodiments and certain modifications of the concept underlying the present invention, various other embodiments as well as certain variations and modifications of the embodiments herein shown and described will obviously occur to those skilled in the art upon becoming familiar with such underlying concept. It is intended to include all such modifications, alternatives and other embodiments insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or equivalents thereof. It should be understood, therefore, that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically set forth herein. Consequently, the present embodiments are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3532886 | Kruger, Jr. et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
4436427 | Schwartz | Mar 1984 | A |
5066950 | Schweitzer et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5321490 | Olson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5546188 | Wangler et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5757472 | Wangler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5793491 | Wangler et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5896190 | Wangler et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6111523 | Mee | Aug 2000 | A |
6188469 | Liou et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6351208 | Kaszczak | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366219 | Hoummady | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373402 | Mee | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396417 | Lee | May 2002 | B2 |
6404506 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6466260 | Hatae et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6546119 | Ciolli et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6573929 | Glier et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6774988 | Stam et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6985073 | Doan | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7123165 | Davenport et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20020012534 | Kibayashi et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020054210 | Glier et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020141618 | Ciolli et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020186297 | Bakewell | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030020633 | Lee | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030080878 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070008176 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |