Rotor blades on military helicopters are routinely removed and installed during maintenance, storage and transportation. Dismantling of a main rotor blade involves the attachment of a blade clamp to the lateral center of gravity of the blade, lifting the blade clamp with a hoist to facilitate removal of the blade from the rotor and then hoisting it away from the helicopter for storage.
The cross section of a typical rotor blade is a classic airfoil design with a rounded leading edge and a sharp trailing edge. The new Blackhawk M model helicopter implements a wide-chord composite main rotor blade containing a trim tab along its trailing edge. “Wide-chord” is a term used to refer to the width of the blades. Composite blade designs are fragile and require sensitive clamping so that the blade is not damaged. The delicate trim tabs on the trailing edge are made with precision, perhaps from a costly material such as titanium alloy strip, for example. By virtue of the blade design, the trim tab is placed at the center of gravity of the blade, which coincidentally is also the blade clamping location.
Securing a rotor blade with a clamp at its center of gravity and connecting a hoist or sling to the clamp to support its weight is known. Blade clamps provide a way to secure or move helicopter blades in order to protect the blades during storage/transit of the helicopter. Protection of a helicopter blade during its removal or installation is critical since many present day helicopter blades are designed with lighter but more fragile materials, allowing for the greater possibility of costly damage. Likewise, modern helicopter blades also require carefully engineered clamps to ensure that damage to the blade does not occur during removal and installation of the blade.
A typical blade clamp is expected to secure the blade at its lateral center of gravity, and when lifted, the blade must hang level from a hoist. Transportation and handling of the blade using the blade clamp must be carried out without any risk of damage to the blade and its accessories. During the clamping operation, the blade clamp must not damage the blade, and thus the blade clamp must avoid certain structurally-sensitive areas on the blade during clamping and removal. Moreover, the clamping pressure must not damage the structure of the blade. The clamping mechanism must be secure, and the structural components used for the blade clamp must have adequate material properties and room temperature durability for the life of the clamp.
Known attempts at a helicopter blade clamp such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,301,982 to Tiemann, feature a leading edge design where the clamp hinge is situated on the leading edge of the blade. Leading edge designs, while able to avoid contact of sensitive trim tabs located on the trailing edge of some types of blades, prevent the blades from entering the blade cradle in a skid.
Additionally, known clamps such as Tiemann, clamp only upon part of the blade, and not along the entire width. This prevents any clamp mechanism from contacting and damaging the sensitive trim tabs on the trailing edge, but at the expense of not evenly distributing the restraining force along the width of the blade. Moreover, because the known blade clamps extend only half-way across the cross section in a clamping-ready position from the leading edge, the blade is not fully secured, resulting in blades being dropped during handling. To prevent this problem, a safety strap was later added to the known blade clamps; however the strap could not be used on blades with trim tabs located at the lateral CG.
Ease of use of known blade clamps is also a problem. Known clamps often require at least three people to maneuver the unclamping of blades and their placement in skids. Moreover, the clamps are too heavy for field use and none of the current clamp designs interface with the blade storage cradle. With the known clamps, removing the blade typically takes 10-15 minutes. First the blade clamp is secured and then a safety strap has to be tied around the trailing edge of the blade. Clamping the blade is done by feel and experience, and any slight mistakes in the clamping process can damage the blade. Once the blades are removed, they are placed with the leading edge down in narrow slots or cradles in a skid. Placing the blade in the skids is challenging, in that the clamp has to be removed at a pre-designated location way from the skid. Then the blade has to be physically lifted by two individuals and placed in the cradle.
Moreover, many known clamps are suited to fit only one type of blade width and cannot safely be used interchangeably with other models of helicopter blades.
Known blade clamps suited for the A/L model Blackhawk helicopter blades have a narrow width. Out of necessity, efforts have been made to use the legacy blade clamps on the newer wide-chord blades. However, special blade clamping challenges present with the new Blackhawk M model blade design prevent these known clamps from being suitable for use.
The older, existing A/L blade clamp requires use of a safety strap due to occurrences of clamp failure. Trim tab location of the M model blades falls at the blade's center of gravity, the necessary location for clamping. The straps on the existing blade clamp damage the trailing edge. The clamping force used to secure the clamp on the blade creates a line force on the surface of the blade that may damage the blade and its sub-surface structure.
What is needed is an ideal new blade clamp that would be lightweight and easily maneuverable such that it could be lowered and unclamped directly into the cradle by a single individual. Also the ideal blade clamp would be easily maneuverable when removing the blade from the cradle for installation on a helicopter. The ideal blade clamp would be a design with features that make it universally adaptable across other platforms with minor modifications. The ideal blade clamp would be capable of clamping with even force across the width of the blade, clamping on the center of gravity located at the trim tabs, but without damaging the trim tabs. The ideal blade clamp would be capable of all the above features while still meeting certain benchmarked structural requirements.
The inventors propose a clamp for a helicopter blade. The blade has a width and leading and trailing edges. The clamp has a first clamping part, a first flexible liner, a second clamping part, a second flexible liner, a hinge mechanism and a connector. The first flexible liner is attachable to the first clamping part and has a cross-sectional shape with outer portions and a recessed middle. The first clamping part fits on a first side of the helicopter blade with the first flexible liner interfacing with the helicopter blade. The first flexible liner has a clamping length at least equal to the width of the helicopter blade. The second flexible liner is attachable to the second clamping part. The second clamping part fits on a second side of the helicopter blade with the second flexible liner interfacing with the helicopter blade such that the helicopter blade can be clamped between the first and second flexible liners. The hinge mechanism pivots the first clamping part and the first flexible liner with respect to the second clamping part and the second flexible liner and vice versa. The hinge mechanism has a pivot point spaced away from the first flexible liner by a distance equal to at least 0.25 times the clamping length. The connector is provided opposite to the hinge mechanism to releasably attach the first and second clamping parts to each other.
The connector may have first and second pieces and an attachment point where the first and second pieces are releasably joined together. The pivot point of the hinge mechanism may be separated from the attachment point of the connector by a distance at least equal to 1.5 times the clamping length.
The first and second flexible liners may be formed of a polyurethane or a neoprene.
The first and second flexible liners may have different hardness values.
The first and second flexible liners may have lips that fit over the first and second clamping parts to attach to the first and second clamping parts, respectfully.
The clamp may have substantially non-flexible structural components that move rigidly with respect to the hinge mechanism, the structural components including the first and second clamping parts. Substantially non-flexible meaning that the structural components are sufficiently rigid as to maintain constant pressure across the width of the blade. In this case, the first and second flexible liners may keep the structural components of the clamp separated from the helicopter blade when the helicopter blade is clamped.
The second clamping part may have front and back parts separated by a secondary hinge. The second flexible liner may have a clamping length less than that of the first flexible liner. When the helicopter blade is clamped between the first and second flexible liners, the secondary hinge may oppose the first clamping part.
The clamp may have a back clamping mechanism with released and fastened configurations. In this case, the released configuration limits an angle of separation between the first and second clamping parts, and the fastened configuration allows the first and second clamping parts to be tightened together at an angle determined by an amount of tightening.
The clamp may have a flexible trim tab guard positioned between the first and second clamping parts and between the flexible liners and the hinge mechanism. In this case, the back clamping mechanism may have a connecting part extending from the first clamping part to the second clamping part. The connecting part may be at least partially surrounded by the trim tab guard. If the second clamping part comprises front and back parts separated by a secondary hinge, when the helicopter blade is clamped between the first and second flexible liners, the secondary hinge opposes the first clamping part. The back clamping mechanism would be between the hinge mechanism and the secondary hinge.
A pivot hoist bar may be pivotally attached to the first clamping part so that the helicopter blade and the clamp can be lifted from above the first clamping part. The pivot hoist bar may be attached to the first clamping part at an attachment point. The attachment point may be variable to adjust to helicopter blades with different centers of gravity.
These together with other aspects and advantages which will be subsequently apparent, reside in the details of construction and operation as more fully hereinafter described and claimed, reference being had to the accompanying drawings forming a part hereof, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout.
So that those of ordinary skill in the art to which the subject invention pertains will more readily understand how to make and use the device described herein, embodiments of the invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings, wherein:
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures for the purpose of describing, in detail, embodiments of the present invention. The figures and accompanying detailed description are provided as examples of the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims appended hereto.
Referring to
The first clamping part can further comprise a top arm 7 spanning the entire length of the blade clamp to which a top clamp plate 8 is connected. The second clamping part can further comprise a bottom arm 9 with a secondary hinge 10 and a bottom clamp plate 11. The secondary hinge 10 can be used to connect the bottom arm 9 to the bottom clamp plate 11. The top arm 7 can further include a pivot hoist bar 12 to connect the blade clamp to a crane. The top 8 and bottom 11 clamp plates may have a wall thickness in the range of from 0.10 to 1.0 inches, more particularly in the range of from 0.20 to 0.40 inches, and most particularly in the range of from 0.25 to 0.35 inches. The top and bottom clamp plates may be extensively ribbed for stiffness. The top 7 and bottom 9 arms may have a wall thickness in the range of from 0.1 to 1.0 inches, more particularly in the range of from 0.25 to 0.75 inches, and most particularly in the range of from 0.45 to 0.55 inches. The top and bottom arms 7, 9 may not incorporate any ribs.
The top 7 and bottom 9 arms are connected at the rear end of the blade clamp 13. With the two hinge configuration, the bottom arm 9 would open wide to facilitate the opening of the bottom plate 11 of the blade clamp.
The blade clamp may further comprise a handle 14 incorporated at the rear of the clamp to facilitate easy lifting of the blade clamp.
Referring to
A hinge mechanism 5 pivots the first clamping part 1 with respect to the second clamping part 3. The hinge mechanism 5 has a pivot point 15 spaced away from the first flexible liner 2 by a distance equal to at least 0.15 times the clamping length. More specifically, the distance is at least equal to 0.25 times the clamping length. Most specifically, the distance is at least equal to 0.50 times the clamping length. The pivot point 15 of the hinge mechanism may be separated from an attachment point of the connector 6 by a distance at least equal to 1.25 times the clamping length of the blade clamp. More specifically, the distance is at least equal to 1.50 times the clamping length. Most specifically, the distance is at least equal to 1.65 times the clamping length.
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Use of this invention is not limited in scope and it is contemplated for use on Blackhawk helicopters as well as on other helicopter platforms.
Those having ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that technologies that spawn from helicopter blade clamp projects will have application outside of these projects. For example, a helicopter blade clamp may be used on many other helicopter platforms such as the Apache platform, the various Bell platforms and the Chinook platform. Moreover, a helicopter blade clamp could also be used on other winged aircraft with delicate wings requiring careful and easy removal and installation of wings for storage and transport.
Although a few embodiments have been shown and described, it would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes might be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the claims and their equivalents.
The U.S. Government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided for by the terms of W31P4Q-05-C-0242 awarded by the United States Army.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2110443 | Larsen | Mar 1938 | A |
2986422 | Renfroe | May 1961 | A |
3123392 | Jacobson | Mar 1964 | A |
3133715 | Grunfelder | May 1964 | A |
3175851 | McMurray | Mar 1965 | A |
3556438 | Meditz | Jan 1971 | A |
3802798 | Hibyan | Apr 1974 | A |
4055026 | Zwicker | Oct 1977 | A |
4223429 | Robinson | Sep 1980 | A |
4301982 | Tiemann | Nov 1981 | A |
4339230 | Hill | Jul 1982 | A |
4366606 | Willis et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4427340 | Metzger et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4445657 | Breckenridge | May 1984 | A |
4449703 | Robinson | May 1984 | A |
4475607 | Haney | Oct 1984 | A |
4535822 | Rogers, Jr. | Aug 1985 | A |
4601639 | Yen et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4623300 | Ruzicka | Nov 1986 | A |
4818004 | Oswalt et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4881874 | White et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5263821 | Noehren et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5383767 | Aubry | Jan 1995 | A |
5697135 | Dischler | Dec 1997 | A |
5772269 | Henning, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797432 | Bennett et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5820186 | Schmitz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823468 | Bothe | Oct 1998 | A |
5832605 | Leahy et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836062 | Leahy et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5853030 | Walding | Dec 1998 | A |
5862576 | Leahy et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6113352 | Certain et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6213712 | Muylaert | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6568644 | Pedersen | May 2003 | B2 |
6644081 | Berry | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681971 | Laverack et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6793186 | Pedersen | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800956 | Bartlett | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6860450 | Muylaert et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6960065 | Leach | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7114924 | Munsch | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7207519 | Hoynash | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20020125282 | Laverack | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040118970 | Muylaert | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050211825 | Hoynash | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090166498 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |