This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/089,224, filed Aug. 15, 2008, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/170,859, filed Apr. 20, 2009, the entireties of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention is related to surgical working platforms. More specifically, the present invention relates to a trajectory guide and method for using the same which facilitates the alignment of surgical and observational instruments into a patient.
Each year roughly 200,000 patients are diagnosed with brain tumors in the United States. Roughly 17,000 of these tumors are “benign,” meaning that the tumor mass is not cancerous. However, the other roughly 183,000 of these tumors are “malignant” (i.e., cancerous), meaning that they are capable of causing or contributing to patient death. Approximately 10% of cancerous brain tumors are “primary” tumors, meaning that the tumors originate in the brain. The primary tumors typically consist of brain tissue with mutated DNA that aggressively grows and displaces or replaces normal brain tissue. The most common of the primary tumors are known as gliomas, which indicate cancer of the glial cells of the brain. In most instances, primary tumors appear as single masses. However, these single masses can often be quite large, irregularly-shaped, multi-lobed and/or infiltrated into surrounding brain tissue.
Primary tumors are generally not diagnosed until the patient experiences symptoms, such as headaches, altered behavior, sensory impairment, or the like. However, by the time the symptoms develop the tumor may already be large and aggressive.
Various treatments for brain tumors exist and several involve accessing the brain so that treatment of the tumor can be effected. One such method of treatment involves the treatment of tumors by “heat” (also referred to as hyperthermia or thermal therapy). In particular, it is known that above 57 C all living tissue is almost immediately and irreparably damaged and killed through a process called coagulation necrosis or ablation. Malignant tumors, because of their high vascularization and altered DNA, are more susceptible to heat-induced damage than normal tissue. Various types of energy sources may be used, such as laser, microwave, radiofrequency, electric, and ultrasound sources. Depending upon the application and the technology, the heat source may be extracorporeal (i.e. outside the body), extrastitial (i.e. outside the tumor), or interstitial (i.e. inside the tumor).
Interstitial thermal therapy (ITT) is a process designed to heat and destroy a tumor from within the tumor. One advantage of this type of therapy is that the energy is applied directly to the tumor rather than passing through surrounding normal tissue. Another advantage of the type of therapy is that the energy deposition is more likely to be extended throughout the entire tumor.
One exemplary ITT process involves the use of laser (LITT) and begins by inserting an optical fiber into the tumor, wherein the tumor has an element at its “inserted” end that redirects laser light from an exterior source in a direction generally at right angles to the length of the fiber. The energy from the laser thus extends into the tissue surrounding the end or tip and effects heating. The energy is directed in a beam confined to a relatively shallow angle so that, as the fiber is rotated, the beam also rotates around the axis of the fiber to effect heating of different parts of the lesion at positions around the fiber. The fiber can thus be moved longitudinally and rotated to effect heating of the lesion over the full volume of the lesion with the intention of heating the lesion to the required temperature without significantly affecting tissue surrounding the lesion.
To locate the tumor or other lesion to be treated with LITT, magnetic resonance imaging is frequently used. Although these imaging systems have been helpful to assist the surgeon in determining a location of the lesion to be treated, an instrument for determining the trajectory for entry of the optical fiber into the brain is necessary in order to ensure controlled accuracy in treating the tumor. Several conventional methods and apparatuses are used to determine trajectory so that surgical and observational instruments may be inserted in the patient's brain.
Stereotactic neurosurgery is a field of neurosurgery in which a probe is advanced through a burr hole to a target of interest by means of a mechanical device attached to the skull with aiming based on pre-operative images. The probe may be a biopsy needle or an implantable device, but it is geometrically rigid, so that its tip can be brought to a target of interest specified on a pre-operative image, by means of a geometrical calculation. For the past decade, the field has been advancing from the imposition of large, classical metal frames, which encompass the entire head of a patient, to the attachment of small platforms placed only over an entry site to reduce patient discomfort, facilitate surgical access, allow multiple targeting during one surgery via multiple platforms, and reduce procedure time, while maintaining the same level of accuracy.
Classical metal frames are designed for approaching one target at a time with an unrestricted entry point towards the deep target by employing the principle that the target is at the center of a sphere. Because of the long trajectories, both accuracy and patient comfort are challenged by the demands of surgeries for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in which the patients are awake throughout the lengthy surgery procedure (about 5-8 hours).
During the last few years, microplatforms have become available as replacements for the classical frames for DBS stereotactic surgery.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,206,890 to Truwit discloses an apparatus for aligning the trajectory of, guiding, and introducing and withdrawing a surgical probe to treat a brain tumor. The apparatus includes a unitary base which has a ball joint member that is movably attached to the base. The ball joint member has a passage therein which forms a portion of the trajectory path. The ball joint member also includes a long, cylindrical, thin-walled guide stem which has an opening therein that substantially aligns with the passage in the moveable member. The ball joint member includes either an integral guide stem for holding the positioning stem or a removably attached guide stem. In the case of the former, a positioning stem is inserted into the opening of the guide stem for purposes of trajectory alignment. In the case of the latter, the removably attached guide stem can be removed and replaced with a positioning stem.
However, there are problems regarding geometric stability, limited space for access to the burr hole and surgical manipulation once the tower is mounted, the time consuming process of aiming, and the difficulty of locking on the target. Access to the burr hole is crucially important for the purpose of stopping bleeding from the bone cavity, dura, and the surface of the cortex during the procedure. Aiming is achieved by watching a guiding icon on the screen of the intraoperative tracking system, while adjusting the orientation of the platform. When the icon indicates a correct trajectory, the platform must be locked into place with one hand, while it is held at the correct trajectory with the other. The trajectory is two-dimensional, meaning that there are two mutually perpendicular angular adjustments required, each of which must be set simultaneously for the correct trajectory. Finding the correct trajectory via the guiding icon is time consuming because of the difficulty of making fine adjustments of one angle of the approach without changing the other angle. A further difficulty with this aiming procedure is maintaining both angles of the correct trajectory while locking the device on target. The locking step can be especially frustrating, because, if either angle is changed inadvertently during locking, as revealed by the guiding icon, the device must be unlocked and the adjustment started from the beginning. Typically several iterations are required, resulting in wasted operating time.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,167,760 to Dawant et al. discloses a device that also requires the attachment of bone-implanted fiducials and the subsequent acquisition of a preoperative tomogram, but it does not require intraoperative optical tracking for aiming. Instead the device is custom made for each patient based on a pre-operative tomogram and the surgeon's identification of the entry point and the target on that tomogram. Thus, the device arrives at the operating suite pre-aimed with no adjustment required intraoperatively. It is a one-piece rigid plastic block having a cylindrical hole that accommodates the probe, supported by a plurality of legs, each of which attaches to a base that is implanted in the skull. Fiducial markers are attached to these same bases before the pre-operative image is acquired and discarded after imaging. The shape of the device provides far greater access to the burr hole but does not allow the surgeon total flexibility in changing trajectory. In addition, while the device is disposable a significant disadvantage is that the patient must wait between the acquisition of the tomogram and the delivery of the device which can range from two to four days.
U.S. Patent Publn. 2007/0106305 attempts to address the shortcomings of the Dawant device by disclosing a surgical platform that includes a ring structure and a ball joint that is configured to be received in the ring structure, where the ball joint defines a bore for accommodating a surgical probe therethrough. The surgical platform includes a plurality of threadably-adjustable leg assemblies. While the adjustable legs provide the surgeon with the ability to make macro and micro adjustments, mechanically the device is cumbersome to use.
Therefore, a heretofore unaddressed need exists to establish a rigid, secure apparatus for holding a long cylindrical medical device in a fixed, three-dimensional trajectory relative to the patient, that is able to withstand torquing, bumping and other potentially dislodging or disorienting forces during patient transfer from the operating room to the MRI suite and while in the MRI suite during the procedure. A further need exists that will give the surgeon complete maneuverability to easily and quickly make macro changes or fine adjustments to the trajectory; to change the position of the medical device when desired and as needed in the MRI; and to visualize the surgical site. The device must be MRI-compatible, lightweight and able to be easily affixed to the patient. The maneuverability allows the surgeon to drill multiple holes.
These and other advantages are accomplished by the trajectory guide in accordance with the present invention. The present invention relates to an MRI-compatible trajectory guide for providing access to a target site of a living subject along a desired path. In one embodiment, the trajectory guide includes a baseplate including a clamp lock, a guide member at least partially contained within the baseplate and having a channel therein, a plurality of adjustable legs each including a first end and a second end, wherein the first end is coupled to the baseplate, and a leg lock coupled to each adjustable leg and moveable between an unlocked position and a locked position in order to set a desired length of the adjustable leg, wherein the adjustable legs and the guide member are structured to be adjusted to provide an infinite number of trajectories in three-dimensional space extending through the channel in the guide member toward a target.
Generally speaking, the present invention encompasses a trajectory guide structured to provide a strong and rigid platform for applications such as neurosurgery which require trajectory alignment. When unlocked, the trajectory guide may be manipulated to align with a wide range of trajectories. In one exemplary embodiment, a plurality of adjustable legs and an adjustable guide member of the trajectory guide may be structured to provide an infinite number of trajectories in three-dimensional space extending through a channel in the guide member toward a target. When locked, the device may provide a secure and rigid interface for a variety of neurosurgical applications. Examples of these applications include, but are not limited to, laser treatment, biopsy, catheter placement, drug delivery, deep brain stimulation, drain hole creation such as for ventriculostomies, and burr hole creation. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the trajectory guide may be useful for applications other than neurosurgical applications without departing from the intended scope of the present invention.
The base plate 11 of the trajectory guide 10 includes a top clamp 16, which includes a first disk having a first hole, and a bottom clamp 18, which includes a second disk having a second hole, hingedly coupled together by hinge means 19, which may include a first hinge portion 20 extending from the top clamp 16 that is structured to mate with a second hinge portion 22 extending from the bottom clamp 18. The first and second hinge portions 20 and 22 may be coupled together via any suitable connection means, such as a pin 24 or similar connection device. Furthermore, the top clamp 16 and the bottom clamp 18 may be locked together in a closed position with a clamp lock 25 after the trajectory is determined.
The top and bottom clamps 16 and 18 each include an opening that is structured to allow a ball joint moveable member 26 to be moveably and rotatably seated therebetween. The ball joint moveable member 26 may include an adapter receiving member 28 and a central receiving lumen (not shown in
As illustrated in
The center ball adapter 30 may include a lumen 38 extending through the tubular portion 32 and the interface portion 34 that is structured to receive a surgical tool. The diameter of the lumens in various center ball adapters may vary depending upon the size of the probe and/or instrument that the lumen is designed and structured to receive. Additionally, the center ball adapter 30 may include a second fastening means 40 that is operable to secure the tool in place once it has been positioned within the lumen 38. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the second fastening means 40 may be similar to the first fastening means 36 previously described.
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, interface means that comprise a pair of notches and a corresponding pair of tabs are merely one example of an interface means in accordance with the present invention. In one alternative embodiment, a single tab and notch may be utilized. In another alternative embodiment, more than two corresponding tabs and notches may be utilized. In yet another alternative embodiment, the position of the notches and the tabs may be reversed such that the notches are positioned within the center ball adapter 30 and the tabs are positioned on the adapter receiving member 28. Various types of interface means other than notches structured to receive mating tabs are also contemplated and within the intended scope of the present invention.
In order to adjust the position of the ball joint moveable member 26, and thus the trajectory line of the trajectory guide 10, the surgeon simply rotates the cam lever 50 relative to the lock base 52 to the unlocked position as illustrated in
An exemplary range of motion of the ball joint moveable member 26 is shown in
In addition to adjusting the trajectory line of the trajectory guide 10 by rotating the ball joint moveable member 26 with respect to the base plate 11, the trajectory line of the trajectory guide 10 may also be adjusted by changing the length of one or more of the telescoping legs 14 supporting the base plate 11. Particularly, changing the length of each leg alters the angle of the bottom clamp 18, which in turn alters the trajectory of the ball joint moveable member 26.
The hinged end 43 of the outer portion 66 of the telescoping leg 14 may include a first hinge portion 68 that is structured to be received by a second hinge portion 70 extending from the bottom clamp 18 of the base plate 11, thereby forming a hinge means 72. As illustrated in
The ball joint end 42 of the inner portion 64 of each telescoping leg 14 includes a ball joint 76 that is structured to be received by a socket in the corresponding foot 12. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the ball joint 76 provides the trajectory guide 10 with a full range of angular travel so that the position of each of the telescoping legs 14 may be set independently.
In one exemplary embodiment, each telescoping leg 14 may have a linear travel of about 15 mm, which provides an angular range of motion of approximately 32° (at the baseplate 11). However, telescoping legs may be designed having any suitable amount of linear travel without departing from the intended scope of the present invention. For instance, the amount of linear travel that is necessary may depend upon the size of the trajectory guide or the range of movement of the ball joint moveable member.
As discussed above, once the inner portion 64 of the telescoping leg 14 has been adjusted relative to the outer portion 66 such that a desired leg length has been obtained, the telescoping leg 14 may be locked with the leg cam lock 44.
As illustrated in
In order to move between the locked and unlocked position, the cam lever 80 may be hingedly coupled to the outer leg portion 66 via any suitable hinge member, such as a pair of post members 86 (only one being shown) structured to be received by apertures within the outer portion 66. Additionally, one or more dimples 88 or similar structures on the cam lever 80 of the leg lock 44 that are structured to be received by corresponding wells 90 in the outer portion 66 may be utilized in order to maintain the leg lock 44 in the closed and locked position (as illustrated in
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the leg lock 44 having a cam lever 80 and a set of teeth 82 that engages with a corresponding set of teeth 84 on the leg represents merely one type of leg locking means that may be utilized in accordance with the trajectory guide of the present invention. One exemplary alternative embodiment of a leg lock 87 is illustrated in
Although not a necessary feature of the trajectory guide 10, each leg 14 may be printed with gradations 92 as illustrated in
As illustrated in
In addition to assisting with the length adjustment of the legs 14, the one or more alignment members 94 may also function as travel stops for the leg 14 to prevent the inner and outer portions 64 and 66 from becoming separated. In one exemplary embodiment as illustrated in
As mentioned above, the trajectory guide 10 attaches to the skull with a plurality of feet 12 equal in number to the number of telescoping legs 14 to position the pivot point provided by the ball joint moveable member 26 above a surface of the skull.
As illustrated in
When the trajectory guide in accordance with the present invention is used in combination with an imaging system, such as a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) system, it may be helpful to incorporate fiducial markers into the trajectory guide to provide points of reference for the user.
Particularly,
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the placement of fiducial markers in the ball joint moveable member and the lower leg portion is illustrated merely for purposes of example and not limitation. Thus, fiducial markers may be positioned within various other components of the trajectory guide instead of or in addition to the ball joint moveable member and the lower leg portion without departing from the intended scope of the present invention.
Although the trajectory guide 10 has been illustrated herein as including the web assembly 45, as discussed above with reference to
As illustrated in
In a further embodiment of the present invention, once the trajectory guide 10 is attached to the patient and the trajectory is set, a protective cap may be attached to the trajectory guide to prevent accidental contact of the trajectory guide during, for example, patient transport to the MRI room.
As illustrated in
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art based upon the foregoing description with reference to the various figures, the trajectory guide in accordance with the present invention allows for any trajectory with respect to a target area. The maneuverability of the trajectory guide may allow a surgeon to drill and access multiple holes without having to move the position of the feet. Additionally, providing telescoping legs allows the surgeon to directly visualize the surgical site.
The foregoing description of the exemplary embodiments of the invention has been presented only for the purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above disclosure.
The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and their practical application so as to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention and various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. Alternative embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains without departing from its spirit and scope. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description and the exemplary embodiments described therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3021842 | Flood | Feb 1962 | A |
3139990 | Jelatis et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
4111209 | Wolvek et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4609174 | Nakatani | Sep 1986 | A |
4671254 | Fair | Jun 1987 | A |
4733660 | Itzkan | Mar 1988 | A |
4733929 | Brown | Mar 1988 | A |
4832024 | Boussignac et al. | May 1989 | A |
4914608 | LeBihan et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4986628 | Lozhenko et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5102410 | Dressel | Apr 1992 | A |
5116344 | Sundqvist | May 1992 | A |
5196005 | Doiron et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201742 | Hasson | Apr 1993 | A |
5207669 | Baker et al. | May 1993 | A |
5207681 | Ghadjar et al. | May 1993 | A |
5230338 | Allen et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5242438 | Saadatmanesh et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246436 | Rowe | Sep 1993 | A |
5247935 | Cline et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5263956 | Nobles | Nov 1993 | A |
5269777 | Doiron et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5281213 | Milder et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5284144 | Delannoy | Feb 1994 | A |
5291890 | Cline et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5292320 | Brown et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5307144 | Hiroshi et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307812 | Hardy et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320617 | Leach | Jun 1994 | A |
5327884 | Hardy et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5343543 | Novak, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344419 | Spears | Sep 1994 | A |
5354293 | Beyer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354294 | Chou | Oct 1994 | A |
5366456 | Rink et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368031 | Cline et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370649 | Gardetto et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5374266 | Kataoka et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5387220 | Pisharodi | Feb 1995 | A |
5433717 | Rubinsky et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5445166 | Taylor | Aug 1995 | A |
5454794 | Narciso et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5454807 | Lennox | Oct 1995 | A |
5454897 | Vaniglia | Oct 1995 | A |
5474564 | Clayman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5492122 | Button et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496308 | Brown et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5509917 | Cecchetti et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5530780 | Ohsawa | Jun 1996 | A |
5534000 | Bruce | Jul 1996 | A |
5537499 | Brekke | Jul 1996 | A |
5568503 | Omori | Oct 1996 | A |
5571099 | Purcell, Jr. et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5620479 | Diederich | Apr 1997 | A |
5632767 | Sinofsky | May 1997 | A |
5638819 | Manwaring et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5672172 | Zupkas | Sep 1997 | A |
5695501 | Carol et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719975 | Wolfson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733277 | Pallarito | Mar 1998 | A |
5749362 | Funda et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749549 | Ashjaee | May 1998 | A |
5752962 | D'Urso | May 1998 | A |
5762066 | Law et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772657 | Hmelar et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785704 | Bille | Jul 1998 | A |
5792110 | Cunningham | Aug 1998 | A |
5807383 | Kolesa et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823941 | Shaunnessey | Oct 1998 | A |
5824005 | Motamedi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5848967 | Cosman | Dec 1998 | A |
5855583 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861020 | Schwarzmaier | Jan 1999 | A |
5891157 | Day et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5947958 | Woodard et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949929 | Hamm | Sep 1999 | A |
5959246 | Gretz | Sep 1999 | A |
5978541 | Doiron et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989246 | Kaufmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993463 | Truwit | Nov 1999 | A |
6004315 | Dumont | Dec 1999 | A |
6006126 | Cosman | Dec 1999 | A |
6022309 | Celliers et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039728 | Berlien et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058323 | Lemelson | May 2000 | A |
6071288 | Carol et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086532 | Panescu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106516 | Massengill | Aug 2000 | A |
6117143 | Hynes et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123719 | Masychev | Sep 2000 | A |
6128522 | Acker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132437 | Omurtag et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162052 | Kokubu | Dec 2000 | A |
6164843 | Battocchio | Dec 2000 | A |
6167295 | Cosman | Dec 2000 | A |
6206873 | Paolini et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206885 | Ghahremani et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206890 | Truwit | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246200 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246896 | Dumoulin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254043 | Schwärzler | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267769 | Truwit | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267770 | Truwit | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280384 | Loeffler | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283958 | Vogl et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286795 | Johnson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293282 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6332891 | Himes | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355028 | Castaneda et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6368329 | Truwit | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368330 | Hynes et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6398778 | Gu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413253 | Koop | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6413263 | Lobdill et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418337 | Torchia | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423077 | Carol et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6425867 | Vaezy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6464690 | Castaneda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464691 | Castaneda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464694 | Massengil | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491699 | Henderson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6529765 | Franck et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544248 | Bass | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551274 | Heiner | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558375 | Sinofsky et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579281 | Palmer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589174 | Chopra et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589233 | Maki | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6695871 | Maki et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701181 | Tang et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716215 | David et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741883 | Gildenberg | May 2004 | B2 |
6752812 | Truwit | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6782288 | Truwit et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6843793 | Brock et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845193 | Loeb et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6893447 | Dominguez et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902569 | Parmer et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6986764 | Davenport et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7033367 | Ghahremani et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7072704 | Bucholz | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7167741 | Torchia et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167760 | Dawant et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7235084 | Skakoon et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235089 | McGuckin, Jr. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7270656 | Gowda et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7344529 | Torchia et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7366561 | Mills et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371210 | Brock et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7463801 | Brekke et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7479139 | Cytron et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7736371 | Schoepp | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7794469 | Kao et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8114068 | Rheinwald et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8165658 | Waynik et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8267938 | Murphy | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8285097 | Griffin | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8298245 | Li et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8414597 | Kao et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20020019641 | Truwit | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042605 | Castaneda et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052610 | Skakoon et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020169460 | Foster et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177843 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030060813 | Loeb et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030171741 | Ziebol et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040075031 | Crain et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040122446 | Solar | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133190 | Hobart et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040134884 | Wei et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167542 | Solar | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167543 | Mazzocchi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040267284 | Parmer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050070920 | Solar et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050154378 | Teague et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060009749 | Weckwerth et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060086868 | White | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089626 | Vlegele et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122590 | Bliweis et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122629 | Skakoon | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060175484 | Wood, III et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060192319 | Solar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195119 | Mazzocchi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206105 | Chopra et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212044 | Bova et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229641 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060287647 | Torchia et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070043342 | Kleinberger | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070100346 | Wyss et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106305 | Kao et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070149977 | Heavener | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070191867 | Mazzocchi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208352 | Henderson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225562 | Spivey et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239062 | Chopra et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250077 | Skakoon et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270717 | Tang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080002927 | Furnish | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027463 | Labadie et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077159 | Madhani et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097187 | Gielen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080123921 | Gielen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123922 | Gielen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080195085 | Loeb | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242978 | Simon et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243142 | Gildenberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255583 | Gielen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269588 | Csavoy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269602 | Csavoy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287917 | Cunningham | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306375 | Sayler et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012509 | Csavoy et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048588 | Peng et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090112082 | Piferi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118610 | Karmarkar et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090124398 | Thompson | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131783 | Jenkins et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090198309 | Gowda et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204111 | Bissig et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090240242 | Neuberger | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090287199 | Hanley et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326525 | Hixon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100041938 | Stoianovici et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042112 | Qureshi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100082035 | Keefer | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110040172 | Carpentier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110118715 | Zerfas | May 2011 | A1 |
20110141759 | Smith | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166447 | Windolf et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110190787 | Sahni | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110217665 | Walsh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110301450 | Hue et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319910 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120053573 | Alksnis | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130018430 | Murphy | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130041356 | Smith et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060253 | Couture et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085342 | Stefanchik et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1317641 | May 2011 | CA |
2620289 | Jun 2004 | CN |
2748071 | Dec 2005 | CN |
101040772 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101194853 | Jun 2008 | CN |
0 610 991 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0 614 651 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0 755 697 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1 829 764 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 985 330 | Oct 2008 | EP |
7-308393 | Nov 1995 | JP |
9-038220 | Feb 1997 | JP |
10-155805 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11-253562 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-000319 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-126316 | May 2000 | JP |
2002-543865 | Dec 2002 | JP |
WO 9005494 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9320769 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 9404220 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9851229 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9852465 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9951156 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0023000 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0067640 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0176498 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 03094759 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004075722 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005046451 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2007056458 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007-056458 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007060474 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007064937 | Jun 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Feb. 15, 2011, regarding PCT/CA2009/001137, 8 pgs. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2013, in Israeli Patent Application No. 210878. |
Office Action mailed Oct. 8, 2012, in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131600.9 (with English-language translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 10, 2013, in PCT/US13/32273. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 15, 2011, in PCT/CA2009/001138, 5 pages. |
Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2011, in Brazilian Patent Application No. PI-0214951-6 (English translation). |
Office Action mailed May 28, 2013, in Brazilian Patent Application No. PI-0214951-6 (English translation). |
Office Action mailed Nov. 1, 2012, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-522361 (with English-language translation). |
Combined Chinese OA and Search Report mailed Mar. 13, 2013, in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131609.X. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2013, in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131600.9 (with English-language translation). |
Kahn et al., “MRI-Guided Laser-Induced Interstitial Thermotherapy of Cerebral Neoplasms,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 519-532, Jul./Aug. 1994, Raven Press, Ltd., New York, NY. |
Kahn et al., “In Vivo MRI Thermometry Using a Phase-Sensitive Sequence: Preliminary Experience During MRI-Guided Laser-Induced Interstitial Thermotherapy of Brain Tumors,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 160-164, Williams & Wilkins, 1998, Baltimore, MD. |
Vogl et al., “Internally Cooled Power Laser for MR-guided Interstitial Laser-induced Thermotherapy of Liver Lesions: Initial Clinical Results”, in Radiology, 1998, 209: pp. 381-385. |
McNichols et al., “MR Thermometry-Based Feedback Control of Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy at 980 nm,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2004, 34: 48-55, Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
Schwarzmaier et al., “MR-guided laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: Preliminary results in 16 patients,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 59, Issue 2, pp. 208-215, Aug. 2006. |
Office Action mailed Jul. 17, 2013, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-522361 (with English-language translation). |
Office Action mailed Jul. 29, 2013, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-522360 (with English-language translation). |
Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131609.X on Jan. 10, 2014. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,725 on Feb. 28, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100042111 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61089224 | Aug 2008 | US | |
61170859 | Apr 2009 | US |