The disclosed embodiments relate to methods, devices, systems and computer program products that enable insertion of transactional (or forensic) watermarks in a video content in an efficient and flexible manner.
Transactional video marking system is a forensic video watermarking system that can be used for applications such as high-value content distribution, including, but not limited to, distribution of pre-release content (e.g., early release of a movie before nationwide theatre distribution, early release for reviewer viewing, etc.), digital cinema, and video-on-demand applications. In such applications, a unique identifier is inserted into each individual video stream in the form of digital watermarks to identify, for example, the content distributor and the transaction (e.g., the provision of the content to a particular user or entity). The embedded watermarks after release of the movie, and potential piracy of the content, can be used to trace back the source of content piracy by identifying the particular user, entity or distribution channel(s) involved in dissemination of the content.
The disclosed embodiments relates to methods, devices, systems and computer program products that facilitate the insertion of transactional watermarks into a video content. One aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a method for facilitating embedding of watermarks into a video content, comprising selecting a first number of frames from the video content, performing one or both of a temporal and a spatial psychovisual analysis on the first number of frames, identifying at least one area within the first number of frames for insertion of watermarks, embedding a first watermark symbol in the identified area(s) of the first number of frames, re-encoding the first number of frames subsequent to embedding with the first watermark symbol to obtain a first alternative data, embedding a second watermark symbol in the identified area(s) of the first number of frames, re-encoding to the first number of frames subsequent to embedding with the second watermark symbol to obtain a second alternative data; and forming an inserter manifest comprising the first and the second alternative data to enable insertion of a watermark into the video content by selecting one or the other of the first and second alternative data for insertion into the video content.
In one exemplary embodiment, the first number of frames are selected to minimize a number of frames that must be re-encoded. In another exemplary embodiment, the first number of frames consist of only frames that are not referred to by other frames in the video content. In another exemplary embodiment, the video content is a compressed video content. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the first number of frames are selected to include image areas that remain substantially similar in consecutive frames. In another exemplary embodiment, identifying the at least one area for insertion of watermarks comprises performing a watermark extraction simulation operation to assess a robustness measure of one or more areas of the first number of frames, and selecting an area within each of the first number of frames that produces highest robustness measure.
According to another exemplary embodiment, performing the watermark extraction simulation operation comprises, for each of the first number of frames: (a) selecting a candidate area of a selected frame for insertion of watermarks; (b) inserting the first watermark symbol into the selected candidate area; (c) impairing the selected candidate area subsequent to embedding with the first watermark symbol; (d) determining a correlation value associated with extraction of the first watermark value from the impaired area; (c) selecting another area of the selected frame that is shifted with respect to the previously selected candidate area; (f) repeating steps (b) through (e) for a plurality of additional shifted areas within the selected frame to obtain a plurality of correlation values; (g) performing steps (a) through (f) but instead of inserting the first watermark value, inserting the second watermark value; and (h) identifying an area with highest correlation value.
In one exemplary embodiment, the method further includes customizing the inserter manifest in accordance with a profile. In another exemplary embodiment, the method further includes receiving a pre-marking message to be inserted as a watermark into the video content for generation of a pre-marked video stream. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the method further includes receiving a built-in message, the built-in message identifying at least a portion of the first or the second alternative data to be excluded from insertion into the video content and to thereby generate a customized inserter and/or extractor manifest that designates, for the excluded portion, the insertion of either the first or the second alternative data into the video content. In one exemplary embodiment, generation of the customized inserter manifest comprises removing one or more of the alternate data from the inserter manifest.
In still another exemplary embodiment, the method further includes producing an extractor manifest to facilitate extraction of watermark from contents include the first and the second alternative data, the extractor manifest including information to assist selection of specific video frames or areas within the specific video frames for watermark extraction. In another exemplary embodiment, the profile specifies at least one of: a channel design, a repeat of payload, a message size, a payload size, or a priority. In yet another exemplary embodiment, each channel represents a different transaction watermark, the channel design is one of a sequential design or an overlapping design, the sequential channel design designates, in a particular sequential order, non-overlapping segments of the video content for insertion of watermark payloads of each channel, and the overlapping channel design designates overlapping segments of the video content for insertion of watermark payloads for two or more channels.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a device that includes a frame selection component coupled to a video decoder to receive a video content from the video decoder and to select a first number of frames from the video content. The device also includes an evaluation component coupled to the frame selection component to receive the first number of frames, the evaluation component including: a temporal psychovisual analysis component to conduct a temporal psychovisual analysis on the first number of frames, a spatial psychovisual analysis component to conduct a spatial psychovisual analysis on the first number of frames, and an area selection component to identify at least one area within the first number of frames for insertion of watermarks. The device further includes one or more combiners coupled to the evaluation component to embed a first watermark symbol in the identified area(s) of the first number of frames and to embed a second watermark symbol in the identified area(s) of the first number of frames, and a video re-encoder coupled to the one or more combiners to re-encode to the first number of frames subsequent to embedding with the first watermark symbol to obtain a first alternative data, to re-encode the first number of frames subsequent to embedding with the second watermark symbol to obtain a second alternative data, and to form an inserter manifest comprising the first and the second alternative data.
In one exemplary embodiment, the frame selection component is configured to select the first number of frames to minimize a number of frames that must be re-encoded. In another exemplary embodiment, the frame selection component is configured to select the first number of frames that only consist of frames that are not referred to by other frames in the video content. In still another exemplary embodiment, the video decoder is coupled to a video input, and is configured to receive a compressed video content and to decompress the received compressed video content.
In another exemplary embodiment, the frame selection component is configured select the first number of frames to include image areas that remain substantially similar in consecutive frames. According to another exemplary embodiment, the area selection component includes a simulator component to perform a watermark extraction simulation operation to assess a robustness measure of one or more areas of the first number of frames, and the frame selection component is configured to select an area within each of the first number of frames that produces highest robustness measure.
In one exemplary embodiment, the simulator component of the above device is configured to perform the following operations on each the selected first number of frames: (a) select a candidate area of a selected frame for insertion of watermarks, (b) insert the first watermark symbol into the selected candidate area, (c) impair the selected candidate area subsequent to embedding with the first watermark symbol, (d) determine a correlation value associated with extraction of the first watermark value from the impaired area, (c) select another area of the selected frame that is shifted with respect to the previously selected candidate area, (f) repeat operations (b) through (e) for a plurality of additional shifted areas within the selected frame to obtain a plurality of correlation values, (g) perform operations (a) through (f) but instead of inserting the first watermark value, insert the second watermark value, and (h) identify an area with highest correlation value.
In one exemplary embodiment, the above device further includes a customizer component coupled to the re-encoder to receive the inserter manifest and to customize the inserter manifest in accordance with a profile. In another exemplary embodiment, the customizer component is configured to receive a pre-marking message to be inserted as a watermark into the video content for generation of a pre-marked video stream. In still another exemplary embodiment, the customizer component is configured to receive a built-in message, the built-in message identifying at least a portion of the first or the second alternative data to be excluded from insertion into the video content and to thereby generate a customized inserter and/or extractor manifest that designates, for the excluded portion, the insertion of either the first or the second alternative data into the video content.
According to another exemplary embodiment, the customizer component generates the customized inserter manifest by removing one or more of the alternate data from the inserter manifest. In another exemplary embodiment, the customizer component is configured to generate an extractor manifest to facilitate extraction of watermark from contents that include the first and the second alternative data, the extractor manifest including information to assist selection of specific video frames or areas within the specific video frames for watermark extraction.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a computer program product stored on a one or more non-transitory computer readable media, that includes program code for selecting a first number of frames from the video content, program code for performing one or both of a temporal and a spatial psychovisual analysis on the selected frames, program code for identifying at least one area within the first number of frames for insertion of watermarks, program code for embedding a first watermark symbol in the identified area(s) of the first number of frames, program code for re-encoding the first number of frames subsequent to embedding with the first watermark symbol to obtain a first alternative data, program code for embedding a second watermark symbol in the identified area(s) of the first number of frames, program code for re-encoding to the first number of frames subsequent to embedding with the second watermark symbol to obtain a second alternative data, and program code for forming an inserter manifest comprising the first and the second alternative data to enable insertion of a watermark into the video content by selecting one or the other of the first and second alternative data for insertion into the video content.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a device that includes a processor and a memory comprising processor executable code. The processor executable code when executed by the processor configures the device to select a first number of frames from the video content, to perform one or both of a temporal and a spatial psychovisual analysis on the selected frames, to identify at least one area within the first number of frames for insertion of watermarks, to embed a first watermark symbol in the identified area(s) of the first number of frames, to re-encode the first number of frames subsequent to embedding with the first watermark symbol to obtain a first alternative data, to embed a second watermark symbol in the identified area(s) of the first number of frames, to re-encode to the first number of frames subsequent to embedding with the second watermark symbol to obtain a second alternative data, and to form an inserter manifest comprising the first and the second alternative data to enable insertion of a watermark into the video content by selecting one or the other of the first and second alternative data for insertion into the video content.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a method that includes using a first inserter manifest associated with a first video stream to facilitate insertion of watermarks into a second video stream. The first inserter manifest comprises at least a first and a second alternative data, and the first and the second video stream include similar image content. In such a method one or both of the following takes place: (a) a frame in the second video stream is identified for embedding of watermark symbols based on a corresponding frame in the first video stream, or (b) an area within a frame in the second video stream is identified for embedding of watermark symbols based on a corresponding area in a corresponding frame in the first video stream.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a computer program product stored on a one or more non-transitory computer readable media, that includes computer code for using a first inserter manifest associated with a first video stream to facilitate insertion of watermarks into a second video stream, where the first inserter manifest comprises at least a first and a second alternative data, and the first and the second video stream include similar image content. Further, one or both of the following is carried out: (a) a frame in the second video stream is identified for embedding of watermark symbols based on a corresponding frame in the first video stream, or (b) an area within a frame in the second video stream is identified for embedding of watermark symbols based on a corresponding area in a corresponding frame in the first video stream.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a device that includes a processor and a memory comprising processor executable code. The processor executable code when executed by the processor configures the device to: use a first inserter manifest associated with a first video stream to facilitate insertion of watermarks into a second video stream, wherein the first inserter manifest comprises at least a first and a second alternative data, the first and the second video stream include similar image content, and one or both of the following: (a) a frame in the second video stream is identified for embedding of watermark symbols based on a corresponding frame in the first video stream, or (b) an area within a frame in the second video stream is identified for embedding of watermark symbols based on a corresponding area in a corresponding frame in the first video stream.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a method for inserting a watermark into a video content that includes receiving the video content, obtaining an inserter manifest comprising at least a first and a second alternative data, where the at least the first and the second alternative data having been generated by preprocessing the video content prior to the receiving, each of the at least the first and the second alternative data, when replacing a particular segment of the video content, producing video segments that are perceptually similar to the particular segment. The method also includes selecting the first alternative data in accordance with a transactional watermark payload and replacing a first segment of the received video content with the selected first alternative data, selecting the second alternative data in accordance with the transactional watermark payload and replacing a second segment of the received video with the selected second alternative data.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a computer program product stored on a one or more non-transitory computer readable media, that includes computer code for receiving the video content, computer code for obtaining an inserter manifest comprising at least a first and a second alternative data, the at least the first and the second alternative data having been generated by preprocessing the video content prior to the receiving, each of the at least the first and the second alternative data, when replacing a particular segment of the video content, producing video segments that are perceptually similar to the particular segment. The computer program product also includes computer code for selecting the first alternative data in accordance with a transactional watermark payload and replacing a first segment of the received video content with the selected first alternative data, and computer code for selecting the second alternative data in accordance with the transactional watermark payload and replacing a second segment of the received video with the selected second alternative data.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a device that includes a processor, and a memory comprising processor executable code. The processor executable code when executed by the processor configures the device to receive a video content, obtain an inserter manifest comprising at least a first and a second alternative data, the at least the first and the second alternative data having been generated by preprocessing the video content, each of the at least the first and the second alternative data, when replacing a particular segment of the video content, producing video segments that are perceptually similar to the particular segment. The processor executable code when executed by the processor also configures the device to select the first alternative data in accordance with a transactional watermark payload and replace a first segment of the received video content with the selected first alternative data, and select the second alternative data in accordance with the transactional watermark payload and replace a second segment of the received video with the selected second alternative data.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a method for over-watermarking a segment of a video content that has an existing watermark embedded therein. The method includes detecting a value of the existing watermark in the segment, determining whether a new value that is designated for embedding is identical to the value of the existing watermark, upon a determination that the new value that is designated for embedding is not identical to the value of the existing watermark, using an inserter manifest to obtain an alternate data corresponding to the new value. The inserter manifest can include at least a first and a second alternative data, the at least the first and the second alternative data having been generated by preprocessing the video content prior to the detecting, each of the at least the first and the second alternative data, when replacing a particular segment of the video content, producing video segments that are perceptually similar to the particular segment. The method also includes inserting the new value into the segment.
In one exemplary embodiment, the over-watermarking is performed in an swapping mode of operation that includes updating the inserter manifest to exclude one alternative data from the inserter manifest that corresponds to each of the embedded symbols of the new value.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a computer program product stored on a one or more non-transitory computer readable media that includes computer code for detecting a value of the existing watermark in the segment, computer code for determining whether a new value that is designated for embedding is identical to the value of the existing watermark, computer code for, upon a determination that the new value that is designated for embedding is not identical to the value of the existing watermark, using an inserter manifest to obtain an alternate data corresponding to the new value. The inserter manifest includes at least a first and a second alternative data, the at least the first and the second alternative data having been generated by preprocessing the video content prior to the detecting, each of the at least the first and the second alternative data, when replacing a particular segment of the video content, producing video segments that are perceptually similar to the particular segment. The computer program product further includes computer code for inserting the new value into the segment.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a device that includes a processor and a memory comprising processor executable code. The processor executable code when executed by the processor configures the device to detect a value of the existing watermark in the segment, determine whether a new value that is designated for embedding is identical to the value of the existing watermark. The processor executable code when executed by the processor also configures the device to, upon a determination that the new value that is designated for embedding is not identical to the value of the existing watermark, use an inserter manifest to obtain an alternate data corresponding to the new value. The inserter manifest comprising at least a first and a second alternative data, the at least the first and the second alternative data having been generated by preprocessing the video content, each of the at least the first and the second alternative data, when replacing a particular segment of the video content, producing video segments that are perceptually similar to the particular segment. The processor executable code when executed by the processor further configures the device to insert the new value into the segment.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a method for facilitating insertion of a watermark into an encrypted video. The method includes decrypting a portion of the encrypted video, using a preprocessor for processing the decrypted portion to generate an inserter manifest comprising at least a first and a second alternative data. Each of the at least the first and the second alternative data, when replacing a particular segment of the video content in non-encrypted format, produce video segments that are perceptually similar to the particular segment. The method also includes, upon a determination that a size of the first or the second alternate data is not a multiple of encryption block size, increasing the size of the first or the second alternate data to become a multiple of the encryption block size, encrypting the first and the second alternate data using an encryption key used for encrypting the video, and generating an inserter manifest that includes the encrypted first and second alternative data.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a computer program product stored on a one or more non-transitory computer readable media that includes computer code for decrypting a portion of the encrypted video, computer code for using a preprocessor for processing the decrypted portion to generate an inserter manifest comprising at least a first and a second alternative data. Each of the at least the first and the second alternative data, when replacing a particular segment of the video content in non-encrypted format, produce video segments that are perceptually similar to the particular segment. The computer program product also includes computer code for, upon a determination that a size of the first or the second alternate data is not a multiple of encryption block size, increasing the size of the first or the second alternate data to become a multiple of the encryption block size, computer code for encrypting the first and the second alternate data using an encryption key used for encrypting the video, and computer code for generating an inserter manifest that includes the encrypted first and second alternative data.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a device that includes a processor and a memory comprising processor executable code. The processor executable code when executed by the processor configures the device to decrypt a portion of the encrypted video, process the decrypted portion to generate an inserter manifest comprising at least a first and a second alternative data. Each of the at least the first and the second alternative data, when replacing a particular segment of the video content in non-encrypted format, produce video segments that are perceptually similar to the particular segment. The processor executable code when executed by the processor also configures the device to, upon a determination that a size of the first or the second alternate data is not a multiple of encryption block size, increase the size of the first or the second alternate data to become a multiple of the encryption block size, encrypt the first and the second alternate data using an encryption key used for encrypting the video, and generate an inserter manifest that includes the encrypted first and second alternative data.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a device that includes a decryptor coupled to a video input to receive an encrypted video content and to decrypt at least a portion of the received encrypted content using an encryption key and a pre-processor component coupled to the decryptor to receive the decrypted portions of the video content and to generate an inserter manifest comprising at least a first and a second alternative data. Each of the at least the first and the second alternative data, when replacing a particular segment of the video content in non-encrypted format, producing video segments that are perceptually similar to the particular segment. The device further includes a customizer coupled to the pre-processor component to generate an inserter manifest that includes encrypted first and second alternative data. The customizer includes an encryption block alignment component, where the encryption block alignment component to increase a size of the first or the second alternate data to become a multiple of encryption block size when the size of the first or the second alternate data is not a multiple of the encryption block size. The customizer also includes an alternate data encryptor component to encrypt the first and the second alternate data using the encryption key.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a method for identification of a watermark within an embedded content. The method includes obtaining the embedded content, searching a database of extraction manifests to obtain one or more extraction manifests that potentially match the embedded content, iteratively using each of the obtained one or more extraction manifests to perform a watermark extraction process, and, upon a successful extraction of a watermark message, providing an indication that the embedded content has been identified.
In one exemplary embodiment, obtaining one or more extraction manifests that potentially match the embedded content is carried out using one or more of a metadata search, a fingerprint search, or a watermarking-based content identifier search.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a computer program product stored on a one or more non-transitory computer readable media that includes computer code for obtaining the embedded content, computer code for searching a database of extraction manifests to obtain one or more extraction manifests that potentially match the embedded content, computer code for iteratively using each of the obtained one or more extraction manifests to perform a watermark extraction process, and computer code for, upon a successful extraction of a watermark message, providing an indication that the embedded content has been identified.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a device that includes a processor and a memory comprising processor executable code. The processor executable code when executed by the processor configures the device to obtain the embedded content, search a database of extraction manifests to obtain one or more extraction manifests that potentially match the embedded content, iteratively use each of the obtained one or more extraction manifests to perform a watermark extraction process, and upon a successful extraction of a watermark message, provide an indication that the embedded content has been identified.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a system that includes a portal for receiving a content from a subscriber, and a back-end processing device coupled to the portal so as to allow the portal to transmit the received content to the back-end processing device. The back-end processing component includes a watermark extractor, an extraction coordinator, an extraction manifest search component and one or more databases with fingerprints and extraction manifests stored therein. The watermark extractor coupled to the extraction coordinator to communicated watermark extraction results to the extraction coordinator and the extraction coordinator coupled to the portal to transmit information associated with the watermark extraction results to the portal for presentation to the subscriber.
In one exemplary embodiment, the portal is configured to allow reception of extractor manifests from the back-end device. In another exemplary embodiment, the portal is configured to allow reception of metadata from the subscriber in conjunction with the received content.
Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a method for selecting an area within a video content for insertion of watermarks. The method includes (a) selecting a candidate area within a frame of the video content that is smaller in size that the frame itself; (b) adding a first watermark value to the selected candidate area to obtain a first version of the area; (c) adding one or more noise components to the first version of the area to obtain a noisy first version of the area; (d) conducting a watermark extraction operation on the noisy first version of the area to obtain a first correlation value; (e) adding a second watermark signal to the selected candidate area to obtain a second version of the area; (f) adding one or more noise components to the second version of the area to obtain a noisy second version of the area; (g) conducting a watermark extraction operation on the noisy second version of the area to obtain a second correlation value; (h) selecting one or more pseudo-random offset values to select a different candidate area within the frame for adding the first watermark value or for adding the second watermark value; (i) repeating operations (a) through (g) until all pixels of the frame have been selected as part of one or more of the selected candidate areas, wherein in each iteration of operations (a) through (g) the values obtained for the first correlation value and the second correlated value are stored; and (j) designating one or more of the selected areas that produced the largest first correlation value or the largest second correlation value for the insertion of watermarks.
In one exemplary embodiment, the method also includes conducting a spatial psychovisual analysis on one or more frame frames that include the designated selected area(s). The spatial psychovisual analysis includes applying a non-linear inverse gamma curve to luminance components of the one or more video frames corresponding to the human visual system response in dark areas; performing a Laplacian or a Gaussian pyramid operation multiple times at multiple resolutions on the one or more video frames subsequent to the applying of the non-linear inverse gamma curve to detect highly textured areas; and performing an edge detection operation to detect edge features within the one or more frames.
In another exemplary embodiment, the above noted method further includes embedding the first watermark value in the designated area of the frame to produce a first embedded version of the frame, embedding the first watermark value in the designated area of the frame to produce a first embedded version of the frame, re-encoding the first and the second versions of the frame to obtain a first and a second encoded version of the frame, respectively, decoding the first and second versions of the encoded frames, comparing one or more measures of quality associated with the decoded first and second versions with corresponding one or more reference measures of quality, and based on the comparing, making a determination to accept or reject the frame as a frame that is suitable for watermark insertion.
a) is a simplified diagram illustrating some of the components of a preprocessor in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.
b) is a block diagram of the preprocessor engine in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.
a) illustrates an mapping of a PRN sequence to a rectangular area in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.
b) illustrates a mapping of a PRN sequence to a circular area in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.
a) illustrates a preprocessor engine for preprocessing an uncompressed video stream in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.
b) illustrates a preprocessor engine in accordance with another exemplary embodiment.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, details and descriptions are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed embodiments. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these details and descriptions.
Additionally, in the subject description, the word “exemplary” is used to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any embodiment or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs. Rather, use of the word exemplary is intended to present concepts in a concrete manner.
The disclosed embodiments enable insertion of transactional (or forensic) watermarks in a video content in an efficient and flexible manner. It should be noted that the disclosed embodiments relate to principles that are well suited for embedding watermarks in compressed video domain, it is, however, understood that the disclosed embodiments are also applicable to watermarking in uncompressed video, as also described in the present application.
Referring again to
a) is a simplified diagram illustrating some of the components of the preprocessor 300 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment. The preprocessor 300 comprises two components: the preprocessor engine 302 and the customizer 304. The pre-processor engine 302 is responsible for the majority of the computationally expensive operations performed on the video content. The preprocessor engine 302 generates the inserter and optionally the extractor manifests that are provided to the customizer 304. The operations and components of the preprocessor engine 302 will be discussed in further detail the sections that follow. The customizer 304 modifies the inserter manifest based on a given profile to produce customized inserter extractor manifests that facilitate embedding and extraction of watermarks at subsequent stages. In some embodiments, the customizer 304 can also optionally produce a pre-marked video. Further details of the operations and components of the customizer 304 are described in the sections that follow.
b) is a block diagram of the preprocessor engine 302 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment. It should be noted that
While each component of the preprocessor 302 will be described in greater detail in later sections, it is instructive to describe the overall operations of the pre-processor engine 302 as follows. The video is input to a decoder 324 to produce an uncompressed video stream, which is directed to a frame selection component 306 that selects a particular video frame or frames for the insertion of watermark. The selected frames are input to evaluation component 322 that may comprise several subcomponents. In particular, the temporal psychovisual analysis component 308 and spatial psychovisual analysis component 310 can conduct psychovisual analysis to determine areas within the frame(s) that can accommodate the embedding of watermarks. For instance, temporal analysis cam determine areas that due to the motion of images within a sequence of frames produce less perceptible artifacts when embedded with watermarks, or alternatively areas of the image that should not be embedded with watermarks since they produce perceptible artifacts. Similarly, spatial analysis determines areas within a frame where the presence of watermarks can be masked (and/or alternatively cannot be masked) due to, for example, the presence of stronger image signals, or higher spatial frequencies. The area selection component 312 determines the actual areas within a frame that can be used for embedding of watermarks. The mask values that are generated by the psychovisual analysis components can be binary valued or non-binary valued (e.g., as a real number). The area selection component 312 can, for example, simulate embedding and extraction of watermarks to select the areas that are suitable for watermark insertion. Thus, the output of the evaluation component 322 can include the selected areas, as well as the masking factors that can attenuate (or eliminate altogether) the embedding of watermarks at certain locations within the selected areas.
The pseudo-random number (PRN) generator 314 produces a set of random numbers (e.g., a random carrier) that can be used for embedding of watermarks. Using the combiner 318 (e.g., a modulator), the PRN is combined (e.g., modulated) with a robustness factor and the pixel values of the selected area as modified by the mask to produce the watermark signals. For example, in case of binary watermark symbols, such watermark signals can represent two streams, one corresponding to the “zero” watermark and one corresponding to the “one” watermark. Using the combiner 320 (e.g. an adder), the watermark signals can then be combined with the selected frames of the unmarked video signal to produce the watermarked video signal. The watermarked video signal is then re-encoded to properly form the compressed video stream that is part of the inserter/extractor manifests.
The PRNs that are generated by the PRN generator 314 are data signals or sequences with strong autocorrelation and/or cross-correlation properties. They also present noise-resistance features because they are pseudo random noise sequences. Examples of the PRNs include maximal length sequences, Gold codes, Kasami codes, Barker codecs, and complementary sequences. A watermark symbol can be embedded by modulating a specific PRN sequence into the video stream. The notation Sij will be used throughout this document to indicate the element j of sequence i, where is the index to the PRN sequence and can range between 0 and the total number of the bits to be embedded as a watermark symbol, and j is the index to an element of the sequence Si and can range between 1 and the total number of pixels of a video frame. Most PRNs are binary sequence, e.g., the value of Sij is either 1 or −1 (or, 0 or 1). Multiple PRA sequences in a set can be generated for embedding multi-bit symbols, and each such sequence has a very low correlation with any other sequence in the set. For example, for a set of 32 PRN sequences, 32 “alternative data” at a single location in the video stream may be produced by the preprocessor engine 302. In other words, up to 5 bits per symbol can be transmitted using the set of 32 PRN sequences.
It should be noted that the term alternative data refers to one or more video stream portions that may alternatively replace a particular segment of the video stream in a manner that such replacement does not produce perceptually significant differences on the rendering and quality of the video stream. For example, a first and a second segment of video stream that are embedded with a zero-valued and one-valued watermark are examples of two alternative data that can replace a corresponding unmarked segment of the video stream. Alternative data is often the same size as, or smaller than, the segment of the video stream that it intends to replace.
PRN Patterns:
A PRN sequence Si that is used in accordance with the disclosed embodiments can be expanded and mapped into one or more arbitrary 2-dimensional shapes such as rectangles, polygons, circles, ovals and the like. One exemplary shape is rectangular area that consists of W×H elements, where W and H are the width and height of the rectangular area, respectively. Such a rectangular area can be further divided into W/Wc×H/Hc cells, where Wc and Hc are the width and height of each cell, respectively. In one exemplary embodiment, mapping a PRN sequence to such a rectangular area is performed by applying the value of Sij to all elements of a cell of the rectangular area.
a) shows a mapping of a PRN sequence to a rectangular area in accordance with an exemplary embodiment. The exemplary diagram of
In another exemplary embodiment, the PRN pattern can be in the form of a circular area. In particular, one example circular design maps a PRN sequence into an solid core with multiple bands of non-overlapping rings around the core. The value of each is applied to all elements of a specific ring (including the solid core), and/or a specific section of a ring.
A PRN pattern is an expanded spatial representation of the PRN. In one exemplary embodiment, the number of elements in a PRN pattern is equal to the number of pixels of the watermarked area (e.g., in luminance domain), and the shape of the watermarked area in a video frame is identical to the shape of the PRN pattern. There are a number of ways to map a PRN sequence into a PRN Pattern. Some non-exclusive examples include: (a) the PRN has only one element and such element is applied to the entire video frame, (b) the PRN has 4 elements, and each element is applied to one of the quarters of the video frame, (c) the PRN has 2 elements, which are applied to the top half and bottom half of the video frame, respectively.
Once mapping of the PRN is carried out, the resulting spatial representation of the PRN is modulated with the mask values calculated by the psycho-visual analysis components to create the watermark signals, as shown in
Referring back to
Guided Frame Selection:
According to some exemplary embodiments, one or more frames of a video can be selected according to a guided frame selection methodology. In particular, an inserter manifest and/or extractor manifest produced from a first video stream can be used to guide the frame selection for a second video stream. For example, the first and the second video streams can be different encodings of the same movie title that are produced for different purposes, such as to provide different bit rates or language versions for the same movie title. In such scenarios, the content of one video are substantially similar to the contents of the other video and, therefore, an inserter (or extractor) manifest that has been generated for one video can greatly facilitate the generation of the inserting and/or extraction manifests for the other video. When the frames in the first video stream are not synchronized with the frames in the second stream (due to editing and/or different frame rates), temporal synchronization information (e.g., fingerprints, timestamps and temporal locations of key frames, scene changes) that is stored in the inserter/extractor manifests can be used to synchronize the frames between the first and second video streams when conducting a guided frame selection. After synchronization, if the selected frames at a temporal location in the first video stream do not exist in the second stream (e.g., because of editing), no frames at the same temporal location in the second stream are selected. Moreover, any frame in the second stream that does not exist in the first video stream is not selected.
In a guided frame selection mode, frames in the second video stream are identified with the frame numbers and/or timestamps of the selected frames specified in the inserter/extractor manifests produced from the first video stream. In another exemplary embodiment, the frames of the first video stream are identified based on an identification scheme (e.g., by computing a fingerprint that uniquely identifies a frame). Such identification information can, for example, reside at the inserter/extractor manifest, or at a database. Guided frame selection in the second video can be carried out by identifying the frames of the second video using the same identification scheme, matching them to frames in the first video stream, and obtaining the associated embedding/extraction information from the manifest.
Additionally, or alternatively, information obtained from sources other than the inserter/extractor manifest can be used to guide the frame selection. One example of such information is a client manifest or playlist for adaptive video streaming used in protocols and systems such as MPEG-DASH (Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP), Microsoft Smooth Streaming, HTTP Live Streaming (HLS) or HDS (HTTP Adaptive Streaming). Such a client manifest or playlist specifies the indices for a client to access the content segments for each bitrate version of the content.
Temporal Psychovisual Analysis: Referring back to
Spatial Psychovisual Analysis:
In the exemplary diagram of
In an exemplary embodiment, the spatial psychovisual analysis operations includes the following operations: 1) a non-linear inverse gamma curve is applied to the luminance component of video images to better match the human visual system response in dark areas; 2) a Laplacian/Gaussian pyramid is performed multiple times at multiple resolutions on video frames in the contrast domain for detection of highly textured areas; and 3) a edge and contour detection algorithm to handle edges is performed. In some cases, image areas within a few pixels of an edge (e.g., edge included) may be avoided by setting the mask values for such areas to 0, or adjusting the mask values to better match the human visual system response around edges. The Laplacian or Gaussian pyramid techniques involve creating a series of images which are weighted down using, e.g., a Gaussian average and scaled down. When these techniques are used multiple times, they create a stack of successively smaller images, with each pixel containing a local average that corresponds to a pixel neighborhood on a lower level of the pyramid.
The temporal mask and spatial mask for each selected frame can be combined multiplied with weights) to produce the final mask.
Area Selection:
Referring back to
To simulate noise channels, such as camcorder capture of the video content, compression or other image/video processing operations, additional noise signals are modulated onto the watermarked video. In one exemplary embodiment, an extraction simulator component, which can be implemented as part of the area selection component 312, performs the following steps in sequence. Assume that f is the selected frame, f(x,y,w,h) is a rectangular area within the frame f, where (x,y) is the top-left coordinate of the area, and w and h are the width and height of the area, and further assume that the number of alternative data is 2 (i.e., binary watermark symbols are used), and w0 and w1 are the watermark signals carrying the symbol ‘0’ and ‘1’ when they are added to f(x,y,w,h), respectively.
Guided Area Selection:
Similar to the above-described guided frame selection, an inserter manifest and/or an extractor manifest produced from a first video stream can be used to guide the area selection for a second video stream. For example, the first and the second video streams can be different encodings of the same movie title that are produced for different purposes, such as to provide different bit rates or language versions for the same movie title. In a guided area selection mode, areas in the second video stream are selected based on the spatial location, size and/or shape of the selected area specified in the inserter/extractor manifests produced from the first video stream. If the width and/or height of the frames in the first video stream are different from the second video stream, the area selected by the guided selection in the second stream can be resized proportionally according to the width and height of the video frame of the first video stream, or registered with the selected area in the first video stream based on spatial fingerprints or other metadata.
Guided preprocessing based on the inserter/extractor manifests produced from the first video stream, including the guided frame and area selections, ensures that when an extractor manifest is required for watermark extraction, only a single extractor manifest is needed for different video streams that are derived from a specific visual work through encoding and/or editing or other processing. One example is the adaptive streaming scenario where multiple video streams with different bit rates are delivered to users based on, for example, the user's network bandwidth and capability of the playback client. In these cases, the input video stream to the preprocessor should be in streaming-ready format such as fragmented MP4, MPEG Transport Stream, or MPEG Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) compatible video stream. In one exemplary embodiment, each video stream is divided into multiple segments, and all segments in all video streams with different bit rates at a specific temporal location are switchable under the request of the playback client. The preprocessor first generates inserter/extractor manifests from one of such multiple video streams (e.g., the video stream with the highest bit rate), and then uses such manifest(s) to guide the generation of inserter manifests for other video streams in such a way that 1) the inserter will insert the same watermark symbols (if any) in a segment, independent of which video stream such a segment come from; and 2) the extractor can extract the watermarks with the aid of the extractor manifest (if required) from a content mixed from segments from all video streams with the different bit rates. For example, assume that S1, S2, . . . Sn are the segments of the first video stream S at one bite rate, and S′1, S′2, . . . S′n are the corresponding segments of the second stream S′ at another bit rate. The guided preprocessing ensures that the same watermark symbol is embedded into either Si or S′i (1≦i≦n), and the watermark can be extracted with a single extractor manifest (if required) from the content delivered to the playback client, which may consists of segments from either S or S′.
Another broader use case of the guided pre-processing is to ensure that a single extractor manifest can be used for all video streams derived from a specific visual work across different regions for a distributor or for all distributors. In the former case, an extractor/inserter manifest produced from the first video stream by a branch of a distributor may be provided to another branch of the same distributor for selected preprocessing of the second stream. In the latter case, a content producer or owner may provide extractor/inserter manifests to all distributors, in addition to the associated content; such distributors may optionally encode and edit the received content to produce video streams for distribution, and then can use such manifest to perform guided preprocessing on such video streams.
Video Re-Encoder:
Referring again to
It should be noted that any frame in the set F can be referred by any other frame within the frame set F, and also can use any other frames that are not in the set F as references, A strategy to reduce the number of re-encoded frames is to select the frames for watermarking immediately prior to a key frame (e.g., an instantaneous decoding refresh (IDR) frame in H.264).
In one exemplary embodiment, after a video frame is optionally re-encoded, the resulting video frame is decoded and its quality is compared with the original video frame using quality measurement methods such as SSIM (Structural Similarity) method, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). If the quality of re-encoded frame reaches unacceptable levels (compared to the original video frame), the candidate frames for watermarking may not be selected.
As is well known in video compression, a compressed video stream, such as an MPEG stream or High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), comprises a series of frames, some of which require information from the previous or future frames for decoding. For example, the raw frames in an MPEG-2 video can be compressed into three kinds of frames: intra-coded frames (I-frames), predictive-coded frames (P-frames), and bidirectionally-predictive-coded frames (B-frames). An I-frame is a compressed version of a single uncompressed (raw) frame that may be decoded independently, without referencing other P- or B-frames. P-frames and B-frames are not independently decidable since they are produced by computing a motion vector which points to the position of a matching block in a reference frame. The process of motion vector determination is called motion estimation. P-frames provide more compression than I-frames because they take advantage of the data in a previous I-frame or P-frame (i.e., the relied upon I- or P-frame is considered as a reference frame for the P-frame). B-frames use the picture in a subsequent reference frame as well as the picture in a preceding reference frame. As a result, B-frames usually provide more compression than P-frames. Further details of video compression and decoding are not described in this document since the details of video compression techniques can be readily found in many published documents and standards.
In some cases, the number of frames to be re-encoded may be larger than the frames in the selected group of frames. For example,
Alternative Data:
As also noted in connection with
In some embodiments, to detect intentional or unintentional manipulations of the alternative data or wrong segment replacement, a hash value of the original data to be replaced by one of the alternative data is computed and associated with each alternative data. The inserter can then perform an integrity validation by comparing the hash value computed from the original data to be replaced with the hash value associated with the replacing alternative data before any replacement.
Watermark Embedding Function:
Referring back to
f′i(x,y,w,h)=fi(z,y,w,h)+[nj,u,v(x,y,w,h)*mi(x,y,w,h)] Eq. (1),
where
Watermarking in Uncompressed Domain:
In some embodiments, transactional watermarking can be carried out in an uncompressed video stream.
Another exemplary embodiment is depicted in
Customizer:
As noted in connection with
Profile:
The profile includes a set of instruction or information that is provided to the customizer to facilitate the generation of customized inserter/extractor manifests, and/or the pre-marked video stream. A Profile may include a list of attributes described below.
Channel design: Transactional watermarking in accordance with the disclosed embodiments allows the insertion of different transactional watermarks in separate “channels.” For example, if a video stream can support a watermarking bit rate of 100 bits per second, the watermarks bits may be allocated as 5 separate channels, each allowing 20-bits-per-second watermark insertion rate. The channel design field (or entry) in the profile defines the design of the channels (for example, up to 5 channels), including, for example, a built-in channel that is only available to the preprocessor (i.e., customizer) for insertion of particular watermark message that will be described later.
As such the disclosed embodiments enable more than one watermark messages to be inserted into a single video stream through one or multiple insertion, sessions. This capability is sometimes referred to as “multi-channel watermarking.”
Each channel can have a payload interval that defines the duration of the segment of the video stream in which one payload for such channel is embedded. In some exemplary embodiments, each payload interval can be configured as being either dynamic or static.
A dynamic payload interval does not have a fixed duration. Therefore, when a payload with a dynamic payload interval is repeatedly embedded into a video stream, each instance of the payload may be embedded in a different duration of the video stream. A static payload interval has a fixed duration. Therefore, when a payload with a static payload interval is repeatedly embedded into the video stream, each instance of the payload shall be embedded in a fixed duration of the video stream.
In some embodiments, a channel may be designed as a sequential channel or as an overlapping channel.
Sequential channel design:
Overlapping channel design:
Repeat:
Another entry in the profile can be the repeat field. This field defines the repetition structure of the payload in each channel. For example, a repeat entry of zero indicates that the payload must be repeated from the start to the end of the video stream, whereas a non-zero entry (e.g., N>0) can indicate that the payload must be repeated in every N times in the video stream.
Message Size:
This field in the profile defines the number of bits in Message defined in each channel.
Payload Size:
This field in the profile defines the number of bits in the Payload defined in each channel.
Payload Interval:
This field in the profile defines the duration in which a payload in a specific channel is embedded once. For example, if the value of this field is 0, the payload interval is dynamic (e.g., a single payload is embedded in a dynamic duration of the video stream based on the embedding capability of the inserter manifest entries). If the value of this field is N (N>0), a single payload is embedded in a fixed N-seconds of the video stream.
Priority:
This field in the profile defines the priority (or importance) of each channel (e.g. from 1 to 5 if the total number of the channels is 5). The greater the value of this field, the higher the priority (or importance) of the channel when more than one channel competes for the embedding resources and capabilities (e.g., when the channels compete to acquire better inserter manifest entries). If two or more channels have the same value of this field, the Inserter Manifest entries are assigned to the channels without considering the priority. By default, this field is set to 0 (i.e., no priority).
In some exemplary embodiments, the priority is determined by one of more following criteria:
Watermark Robustness: Inserter manifest entries with more robust watermarks are selected for channels with a higher priority; the watermark robustness can be determined based on, for example, correlation values that were described previously.
Inserter Manifest Size: Inserter manifest entries with the smaller sizes are selected for channels with a higher priority.
Watermark Transparency: Inserter manifest entries with more transparent watermarks are selected for channels with a higher priority; the transparency can be determined based on, for example, the mask values that were described previously.
The following Table illustrates the assignment of priority values in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.
Pre-Watermarking:
Referring back to
Built-In Message:
Referring again to
An example application of the built-in message includes a scenario in which the inserter only needs to insert a unique identifier for each pre-processor, as provided by the built-in message. Such identifier can be stored in a pre-processor prior to its shipment. Thus, all video streams that are preprocessed by such preprocessor will contain such preprocessor identifier after applying inserter functionality. When such pre-processor identifiers are associated with a content distributor, such identifiers (e.g., “Distributor IDs”) can also be used to identify the content distributor.
Over-Watermarking:
An inserter manifest can be customized to allow an inserter to insert a new watermark message that completely replaces the existing watermark message in the video stream.
Over-watermarking in accordance with the exemplary embodiments of the present application may be carried out in one of two different manners: in overwriting mode and in swapping mode. In the swapping mode, the inserter updates the inserter manifest for each insertion, whereas in the overwriting mode the same inserter manifest may be used for ail over-watermarking.
Overwriting Mode:
In the overwriting mode, the number of alternative data in the inserter manifest entries is equal to all possible alternative data entries. In one exemplary embodiment, the inserter manifest includes 2n alternative data entries, where n is the number of bits that can be inserted in an entry. The inserter performs the insertion without considering the presence of the existing watermark. For example, if the new watermark is a “1” watermark, the alternative data in the inserter manifest entry associated with the “1” watermark is selected and is used to replace the video segment associated with the existing watermark in the video stream regardless of the value of the existing watermark.
Swapping Mode:
In the swapping mode, the inserter manifest does not include all of possible alternative data entries. In one exemplary embodiment, the number of alternative data in inserter manifest entries is 2n−1, where n is the number of bits that can be inserted in an entry. The reason for the missing entry (compared to the overwriting mode) is that the missing entry is presumed to have been inserted in the video stream. In the swapping mode, if the pre-existing watermark value (e.g., a bit) is different from the value of the new watermark to be inserted, the alternative data is swapped with the data that is in the video stream (i.e., the original data). However, if the pre-existing watermark value is the same as the alternative data, no replacement or swapping takes place.
The swapping mode reduces the inserter manifest size by remembering the presence and the value represented by the “original data” in the inserter manifest. However, the inserter manifest needs to be updated by the inserter for each over-watermarking session.
Watermark Encrypted Content:
To support direct insertion on encrypted video stream, the inserter manifest produced by pre-processor is customized in accordance with an exemplary embodiment to meet the following criteria: 1) all alternative data in the inserter manifest is encrypted by the same algorithm and the same key used for encryption of the video stream; and 2) all alternative data must is an integer byte number of the encryption block size. For example, the size of an alternative data must be in the multiple of 16 bytes if an AES encryption block size is 16 bytes.
Watermark Extraction:
Video Preparation:
As illustrated in
According to an exemplary embodiment, at least two kinds of fingerprints that are registered by the pre-processor and stored in the extractor manifest file can help the automated video temporal and spatial registration: 1) temporal fingerprints based on the relationships and characteristics between and among frames for identifying the watermarked frames, and 2) spatial fingerprints based on salient and feature points for identifying the watermarked areas within the watermarked frames.
Correlation:
Referring to
In one example embodiment, to extract an N-bit symbol, 2N PRN patterns are retrieved, or generated, as described earlier. Each of these 2N PRN patterns is correlated with the watermarked area of the user video to produce N correlation values. The symbol value corresponding to the highest correlation value is the extracted symbol value (or the most likely extracted symbol value).
Local optimization may be performed by conducting a local search of the watermarked areas in the user video with a search window. The correlation operation is performed repeatedly by moving the watermarked area within the windows.
Aggregation Over Watermarked Frames: The correlation operations described above extract a symbol value from a single selected frame. When two or more consecutive frames are selected to embed the same symbol, the correlation values from each of such consecutive frames are statistically aggregated. In one exemplary embodiment, the symbol value corresponding to the highest aggregated correlation value determines the extracted symbol value. In the example system of
One, or a combination, of the following aggregation methods can be used for watermark aggregation: (1) first aggregate watermark signals over consecutive watermarked frames, and then perform correlation, or (2) first perform correlation on each watermarked frame, and then aggregate the correlation values over consecutive watermarked frames.
Message Decoder:
Message decoder decodes the extracted payload into a watermark message. The following example illustrates how message decoding can be done in one exemplary embodiment where the inserted watermark payload is error-correction-code encoded. Once an instance of the payload is detected, an error correction decoder is invoked to decode the payload instance. If the error correction decoder fails to decode the payload instance, this instance is statistically combined with the previous consecutive payload instances, which cannot be decoded individually or combined, to produce a combined payload instance. The error correction decoder is called again to decode the combined payload instance. The above steps can be repeated until a watermark message is successfully decoded, or to a point where the end of the content from which the extraction is attempted is reached.
Extraction Portal:
In the exemplary system of
Extractor Manifest Registration:
In the exemplary system of
Extractor Manifest Search:
According to an exemplary embodiment, once the extractor manifest search module receives an extraction request, it first identifies the corresponding extractor manifests that have been registered with the portal. The search can be conducted using any one, or combinations of, the following methodologies.
Metadata Search:
This method identities the extraction manifests by matching the metadata optionally provided in the request against the metadata in the extractor manifest files that reside at the extractor manifest database.
Fingerprints Match:
This method uses fingerprints to identify the extractor manifest. For example, video fingerprints of movie titles are registered in the fingerprint (FP) database(s). The extractor manifest search module extracts the fingerprints from the submitted video, matches them against the stored fingerprints at the FP database, and provides all extractor manifest files that belong to the matched title to the extraction coordinator.
Watermarking-Based Content Identifier (CID):
In this search method, a CID detected from the watermarks embedded in the audio and/or video tracks of the submitted video can be used to identify the registered extractor manifests by matching such CIDs with the CIDs of the registered video that reside at the database.
Extraction Coordinator:
Referring again to
Extraction Investigation:
Extraction investigation is a forensic investigation phase typically involving a manual process and/or an in-depth scrutiny of content to evaluate whether or not watermarks are present (even if their value cannot be ascertained) and to provide any other insight as to the origins or history of the content. In one exemplary embodiment, the extraction investigation process includes 1) verifying the extractor manifest files selected by the extractor manifest search module and/or 2) verifying the extraction results by investigating the detailed log files produced by the extractor. Such detailed log files may only be produced by Extractor under an “investigative” execution mode.
Certain aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be implemented as a device that includes a processor, and a memory comprising processor executable code. The processor executable code, when executed by the processor, configures the device to perform any one of and/or all operations that are described in the present application. For example,
As shown in various figures of the present application, such as
Various embodiments described herein are described in the general context of methods or processes, which may be implemented in one embodiment by a computer program product, embodied in a computer-readable medium, including computer-executable instructions, such as program code, executed by computers in networked environments. A computer-readable medium may include removable and non-removable storage devices including, but not limited to, Read Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), compact discs (CDs), digital versatile discs (DVD), Blu-ray Discs, etc. Therefore, the computer-readable media described in the present application include non-transitory storage media. Generally, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer-executable instructions, associated data structures, and program modules represent examples of program code for executing steps of the methods disclosed herein. The particular sequence of such executable instructions or associated data structures represents examples of corresponding acts for implementing the functions described in such steps or processes.
For example, one aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a computer program product that is embodied on a non-transitory computer readable medium. The computer program product includes program code for carrying out any one or and/or all of the operations of the disclosed embodiments.
The foregoing description of embodiments has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit embodiments of the present invention to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of various embodiments. The embodiments discussed herein were chosen and described in order to explain the principles and the nature of various embodiments and their practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the present invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. The features of the embodiments described herein may be combined in all possible combinations of methods, apparatus, modules, systems, and computer program products.
This patent application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/785,149, filed Mar. 14, 2013. The entire content of the before-mentioned provisional patent application is incorporated by reference as part of the disclosure of this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3406344 | Hopper | Oct 1968 | A |
3842196 | Loughlin | Oct 1974 | A |
3885217 | Cintron | May 1975 | A |
3894190 | Gassmann | Jul 1975 | A |
3919479 | Moon et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3973206 | Haselwood et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4048562 | Haselwood et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4176379 | Wessler et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4199788 | Tsujimura | Apr 1980 | A |
4225967 | Miwa et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4230990 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4281217 | Dolby | Jul 1981 | A |
4295128 | Hashemian et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4425578 | Haselwood et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4454610 | Sziklai | Jun 1984 | A |
4464656 | Nakamura | Aug 1984 | A |
4497060 | Yang | Jan 1985 | A |
4512013 | Nash et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4547804 | Greenberg | Oct 1985 | A |
4564862 | Cohen | Jan 1986 | A |
4593904 | Graves | Jun 1986 | A |
4639779 | Greenberg | Jan 1987 | A |
4669089 | Gahagan et al. | May 1987 | A |
4677466 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686707 | Iwasaki et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4703476 | Howard | Oct 1987 | A |
4706282 | Knowd | Nov 1987 | A |
4723302 | Fulmer et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4729398 | Benson et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4739398 | Thomas et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4750173 | Bluthgen | Jun 1988 | A |
4755871 | Morales-Garza et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4755884 | Efron et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4764608 | Masuzawa et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4764808 | Solar | Aug 1988 | A |
4789863 | Bush | Dec 1988 | A |
4805020 | Greenberg | Feb 1989 | A |
4807013 | Manocha | Feb 1989 | A |
4807031 | Broughton et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4840602 | Rose | Jun 1989 | A |
4843562 | Kenyon et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4876617 | Best et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4876736 | Kiewit | Oct 1989 | A |
4930011 | Kiewit | May 1990 | A |
4931871 | Kramer | Jun 1990 | A |
4937807 | Weitz et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939515 | Adelson | Jul 1990 | A |
4943963 | Waechter et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945412 | Kramer | Jul 1990 | A |
4967273 | Greenberg | Oct 1990 | A |
4969041 | O'Grady et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4972471 | Gross et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4972503 | Zurlinden | Nov 1990 | A |
4979210 | Nagata et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5057915 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1991 | A |
5073925 | Nagata et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080479 | Rosenberg | Jan 1992 | A |
5113437 | Best et al. | May 1992 | A |
5116437 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1992 | A |
5161251 | Mankovitz | Nov 1992 | A |
5191615 | Aldava et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5200822 | Bronfin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210820 | Kenyon | May 1993 | A |
5210831 | Emma et al. | May 1993 | A |
5213337 | Sherman | May 1993 | A |
5214792 | Alwadish | May 1993 | A |
5237611 | Rasmussen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251041 | Young et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5270480 | Hikawa | Dec 1993 | A |
5294962 | Sato et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5294982 | Salomon et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5319453 | Copriviza et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5319735 | Preuss et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5351304 | Yamamoto | Sep 1994 | A |
5379345 | Greenberg | Jan 1995 | A |
5402488 | Karlock | Mar 1995 | A |
5404160 | Schober et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5404377 | Moses | Apr 1995 | A |
5408258 | Kolessar | Apr 1995 | A |
5414729 | Fenton | May 1995 | A |
5424785 | Orphan | Jun 1995 | A |
5425100 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432799 | Shimpuku et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436653 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5450490 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452901 | Nakada et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5473631 | Moses | Dec 1995 | A |
5481294 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497372 | Nankoh et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502576 | Ramsay et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504518 | Ellis et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5508754 | Orphan | Apr 1996 | A |
5519454 | Willis | May 1996 | A |
5523794 | Mankovitz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526427 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537484 | Kobayashi | Jul 1996 | A |
5579124 | Aijala et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581658 | O'Hagan et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5581800 | Fardeau et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592553 | Guski et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5612729 | Ellis et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613004 | Cooperman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5636292 | Rhoads | Jun 1997 | A |
5664018 | Leighton | Sep 1997 | A |
5687191 | Lee et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687236 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699427 | Chow et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719619 | Hattori et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719937 | Warren et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5737329 | Horiguchi | Apr 1998 | A |
5752880 | Gabai et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761606 | Wolzien | Jun 1998 | A |
5764763 | Jensen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778108 | Coleman, Jr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787334 | Fardeau et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5805635 | Andrews, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809064 | Fenton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809139 | Girod et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819289 | Sanford, II et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822360 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822432 | Moskowitz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825892 | Braudaway et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828325 | Wolosewicz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832119 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5841978 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5848155 | Cox | Dec 1998 | A |
5850249 | Massetti et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850481 | Rhoads | Dec 1998 | A |
5862260 | Rhoads | Jan 1999 | A |
5870030 | DeLuca et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5887243 | Harvey et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889868 | Moskowitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893067 | Bender et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901178 | Lee et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905800 | Moskowitz et al. | May 1999 | A |
5930369 | Cox et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933798 | Linnartz | Aug 1999 | A |
5937000 | Lee et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940124 | Janko et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940134 | Wirtz | Aug 1999 | A |
5940135 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940429 | Lam et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943422 | Van Wie et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945932 | Smith et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949885 | Leighton | Sep 1999 | A |
5960081 | Vynne et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963909 | Warren et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986692 | Logan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6021432 | Sizer, II et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031914 | Tewfik et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035171 | Takaya et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035177 | Moses et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037984 | Isnardi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044156 | Honsinger et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061793 | Tewfik et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067440 | Diefes | May 2000 | A |
6078664 | Moskowitz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6094228 | Ciardullo et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101310 | Terada et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122610 | Isabelle | Sep 2000 | A |
6128597 | Kolluru et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145081 | Winograd et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154571 | Cox et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160986 | Gabai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173271 | Goodman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175627 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189123 | Anders Nystrom et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209092 | Linnartz | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209094 | Levine et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222932 | Rao et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229572 | Ciardullo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233347 | Chen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246775 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246802 | Fujihara et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249870 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252972 | Linnartz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253113 | Lu | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6268866 | Shibata | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278792 | Cox et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282299 | Tewfik et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285774 | Schumann et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289108 | Rhoads | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290566 | Gabai et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6330335 | Rhoads | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330672 | Shur | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332031 | Rhoads et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332194 | Bloom et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353672 | Rhoads | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363159 | Rhoads | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373974 | Zeng | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374036 | Ryan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381341 | Rhoads | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385330 | Powell et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388712 | Shinohara et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389152 | Nakamura et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6389538 | Gruse et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400826 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6400827 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404781 | Kawamae et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404898 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411725 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415040 | Linnartz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415041 | Oami et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424726 | Nakano et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6427012 | Petrovic | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430301 | Petrovic | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430302 | Rhoads | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6442285 | Rhoads et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6449367 | Van Wie et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6449496 | Beith et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473560 | Linnartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477431 | Kalker et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487301 | Zhao | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490355 | Epstein | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496591 | Rhoads | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505160 | Levy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510233 | Nakano | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510234 | Cox et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512837 | Ahmed | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6523113 | Wehrenberg | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529506 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530021 | Epstein et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6550011 | Sims, III | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553127 | Kurowski | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556688 | Ratnakar | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557103 | Boncelet, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570996 | Linnartz | May 2003 | B1 |
6571144 | Moses et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574350 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577744 | Braudaway et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584138 | Neubauer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6590996 | Reed et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590997 | Rhoads | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591365 | Cookson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592516 | Lee | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598162 | Moskowitz | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614914 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618484 | Van Wie et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625297 | Bradley | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628729 | Sorensen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633653 | Hobson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636615 | Rhoads et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636967 | Koyano | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647128 | Rhoads | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647129 | Rhoads | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654501 | Acharya et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6661905 | Chupp et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665419 | Oami | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668068 | Hashimoto | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671376 | Koto et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671388 | Op De Beeck et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674861 | Xu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6674876 | Hannigan et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6675146 | Rhoads | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678389 | Sun et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681029 | Rhoads | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683958 | Petrovic | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6697944 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700990 | Rhoads | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704431 | Ogawa et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707926 | Macy et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721439 | Levy et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728390 | Rhoads et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737957 | Petrovic et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738495 | Rhoads et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744906 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748360 | Pitman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751337 | Tewfik et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757405 | Muratani et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757908 | Vogel | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760463 | Rhoads | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768807 | Muratani | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771797 | Ahmed | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785399 | Fujihara | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785401 | Walker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785815 | Serret-Avila et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792542 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798893 | Tanaka | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801999 | Venkatesan et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810527 | Conrad et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6823455 | Macy et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829368 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6829582 | Barsness | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834344 | Aggarwal et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834345 | Bloom et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850555 | Barclay | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6850626 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856693 | Miller | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871180 | Neuhauser et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6880082 | Ohta | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888943 | Lam et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6891958 | Kirovski et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912010 | Baker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912294 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912315 | Wong et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6915002 | Gustafson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6915422 | Nakamura | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6915481 | Tewfik et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928233 | Walker et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931536 | Hollar | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944313 | Donescu | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6944771 | Epstein | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947571 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6947893 | Iwaki et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952774 | Kirovski et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6954541 | Fan et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961854 | Serret-Avila et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973195 | Matsui | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6993154 | Brunk | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996249 | Miller et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007166 | Moskowitz et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7020304 | Alattar et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024018 | Petrovic | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043049 | Kuzma | May 2006 | B2 |
7043536 | Philyaw et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7043638 | McGrath et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046808 | Metois et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7054461 | Zeller et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054462 | Rhoads et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058809 | White et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058815 | Morin | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068809 | Stach | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072492 | Ogawa et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7103678 | Asai et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107452 | Serret-Avila et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111169 | Ripley et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113613 | Echizen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123718 | Moskowitz et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7142691 | Levy | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7159118 | Petrovic | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162642 | Schumann et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164778 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167560 | Yu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167599 | Diehl | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171020 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177429 | Moskowitz et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197368 | Kirovski et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206649 | Kirovski et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224819 | Levy et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7231061 | Bradley | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7289643 | Brunk et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298865 | Lubin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7319759 | Peinado et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7321666 | Kunisa | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7334247 | Finseth et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7336802 | Kunisa | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346514 | Herre et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7369677 | Petrovic et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7369678 | Rhoads | May 2008 | B2 |
7389421 | Kirovski et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7409073 | Moskowitz et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7430670 | Horning et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7450727 | Griesinger | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454019 | Williams | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460667 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7562392 | Rhoads et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7581103 | Home et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587601 | Levy et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7616776 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617509 | Brunheroto et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7630497 | Lotspiech et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644282 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7660991 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664332 | Wong et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7693297 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698570 | Schumann et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7756272 | Kocher et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7788684 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788693 | Robbins | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7818763 | Sie et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7840006 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7979881 | Wong et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7983922 | Neusinger et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7986806 | Rhoads | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991995 | Rabin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005258 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015410 | Pelly et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8055013 | Levy et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8059815 | Lofgren et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8059858 | Brundage et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8085935 | Petrovic | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8106744 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106745 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8138930 | Heath | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8151113 | Rhoads | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8155463 | Wong et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8181262 | Cooper et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8189861 | Rucklidge | May 2012 | B1 |
8194803 | Baum et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8249992 | Harkness et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8259938 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280103 | Petrovic et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301893 | Brundage | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8315835 | Tian et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8321679 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8340348 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8346532 | Chakra et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8346567 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8451086 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8467717 | Croy et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8479225 | Covell et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8533481 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8538066 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8588459 | Bloom et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8589969 | Falcon | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8601504 | Stone et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615104 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8681978 | Petriovic et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8682026 | Petrovic et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8726304 | Petrovic et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8745403 | Petrovic | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8781967 | Tehranchi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8791789 | Petrovic et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8806517 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8811655 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8838977 | Winograd et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838978 | Winograd et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8869222 | Winograd et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8923548 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9009482 | Winograd | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9055239 | Tehranchi et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9106964 | Zhao | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117270 | Wong et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20010001159 | Ford | May 2001 | A1 |
20010021926 | Schneck et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010022786 | King et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010025341 | Marshall | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010044899 | Levy | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051996 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054146 | Carro et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007403 | Echizen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010684 | Moskowitz | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012443 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019769 | Barritz et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020033844 | Levy et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044659 | Ohta | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052885 | Levy | May 2002 | A1 |
20020053026 | Hashimoto | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054089 | Nicholas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068987 | Hars | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080964 | Stone et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080976 | Schreer | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082731 | Pitman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095577 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097873 | Petrovic | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120849 | McKinley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120854 | LeVine et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126842 | Hollar | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126872 | Brunk et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138734 | David et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154144 | Lofgren et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168087 | Petrovic | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178368 | Yin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020199106 | Hayashi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009671 | Yacobi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012098 | Sako et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012403 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016825 | Jones | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021439 | Lubin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021441 | Levy et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028796 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031317 | Epstein | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033321 | Schrempp et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037075 | Hannigan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030053655 | Barone et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056213 | McFaddin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061489 | Pelly et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063747 | Petrovic | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070075 | Deguillaume et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072468 | Brunk et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076955 | Alve et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078891 | Capitant | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081780 | Kim | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081809 | Fridrich et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112974 | Levy | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112997 | Ahmed | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115504 | Holliman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131350 | Peiffer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152225 | Kunisa | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174862 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177359 | Bradley | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179901 | Tian et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185417 | Alattar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187679 | Odgers et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030188166 | Pelly et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030190054 | Troyansky et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030190055 | Kalker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200438 | Kirovski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030223584 | Bradley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040005076 | Hosaka et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008864 | Watson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009763 | Stone et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010692 | Watson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015400 | Whymark | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025023 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040025176 | Franklin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028255 | Miller | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042635 | Epstein et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042636 | Oh | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073916 | Petrovic et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078575 | Morten et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088556 | Weirauch | May 2004 | A1 |
20040091111 | Levy et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093202 | Fischer et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093523 | Matsuzaki et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098593 | Muratani | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101160 | Kunisa | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103293 | Ryan | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111740 | Seok et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120544 | Eguchi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133794 | Kocher et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136531 | Asano et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151316 | Petrovic | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169581 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174996 | Tewfik et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202324 | Yamaguchi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204943 | Kirovski et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216157 | Shain et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040250078 | Stach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258274 | Brundage et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260930 | Malik et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008190 | Levy et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010779 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013462 | Rhoads | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025332 | Seroussi | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050332 | Serret-Avila et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071283 | Randle et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071669 | Medvinsky et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050120220 | Oostveen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144632 | Mears et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154891 | Skipper | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177861 | Ma et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050196051 | Wong et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202781 | Steelberg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242568 | Long et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251683 | Levy et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267928 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005029 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060056653 | Kunisa | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062426 | Levy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075424 | Talstra et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104477 | Isogai et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060190403 | Lin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060227968 | Chen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239501 | Petrovic et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070003103 | Lemma et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005500 | Steeves et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033146 | Hollar | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070039018 | Saslow et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070100483 | Kentish et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110237 | Tehranchi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143617 | Farber et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150418 | Ben-Menahem et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168673 | Van Der Veen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177761 | Levy | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192261 | Kelkar et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208711 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214049 | Postrel | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223708 | Villemoes et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080002854 | Tehranchi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016360 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031463 | Davis | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080209219 | Rhein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219643 | Le Buhan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228733 | Davis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080273861 | Yang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298632 | Reed | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301304 | Chitsaz et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310629 | Van Der Veen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310673 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313741 | Alve et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090031134 | Levy | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090033617 | Lindberg et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090086812 | Ducharme | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090136082 | Zandifar et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158318 | Levy | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172405 | Shiomi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175594 | Ann et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177674 | Yoshida | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090208008 | Lubin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090262932 | Petrovic | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090319639 | Gao et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326961 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011217 | Tachibana et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023489 | Miyata et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034513 | Nakano et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046606 | Celik et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069151 | Suchocki | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100111355 | Petrovic et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115267 | Guo et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121608 | Tian et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100146286 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159425 | Hamlin | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162352 | Haga et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100214307 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226525 | Levy et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228632 | Rodriguez | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228857 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287579 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287609 | Gonzalez et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100332723 | Lin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016172 | Shah | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110068898 | Petrovic et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091066 | Alattar | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103444 | Baum et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110123063 | Delp et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110173210 | Ahn et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110194727 | Guo et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202687 | Glitsch et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202844 | Davidson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209191 | Shah | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214044 | Davis et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110214143 | Rits et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219229 | Cholas et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225427 | Wood et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235908 | Ke et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110255690 | Kocher et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261667 | Ren et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110286625 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293090 | Ayaki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311056 | Winograd | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320627 | Landow et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017091 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023595 | Speare et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120026393 | Petrovic et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120072729 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072730 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072731 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084870 | Petrovic | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102304 | Brave | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120122429 | Wood et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129547 | Andrews, III et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130719 | Petrovic et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120203556 | Villette et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203734 | Spivack et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216236 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120265735 | McMillan et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272012 | Aronovich et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272327 | Shin et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120300975 | Chalamala et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300977 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304206 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120308071 | Ramsdell et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007462 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130011006 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031579 | Klappert | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130060837 | Chakraborty et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073065 | Chen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130108101 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130114847 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130114848 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117570 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117571 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130129303 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132727 | Petrovic | May 2013 | A1 |
20130142382 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151855 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151856 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130152210 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130283402 | Petrovic | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130339029 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140029786 | Winograd | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140067950 | Winograd | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071342 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074855 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075465 | Petrovic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075466 | Zhao | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075469 | Zhao | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140229963 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140237628 | Petrovic | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140267907 | Downes et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270337 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270338 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279296 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279549 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140325550 | Winograd et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140325673 | Petrovic | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140355817 | Wong et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376723 | Petrovic | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150016228 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150016663 | Tehranchi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150030200 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036873 | Petrovic et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150121534 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2276638 | Jan 2000 | CA |
1447269 | Oct 2003 | CN |
1556987 | Dec 2004 | CN |
101001354 | Jul 2007 | CN |
282734 | Sep 1988 | EP |
372601 | Jun 1990 | EP |
581317 | Feb 1994 | EP |
1137250 | Sep 2001 | EP |
2166725 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2306725 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2605485 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2653964 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2782337 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2260246 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2292506 | Feb 1996 | GB |
2358313 | Jul 2001 | GB |
2363027 | Dec 2001 | GB |
10-150548 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11-086435 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-284516 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-346302 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-069273 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000083159 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-174628 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000163870 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000216981 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001022366 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-119555 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001175270 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001-188549 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-216763 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-218006 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001245132 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001257865 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001-312570 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001-527660 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2001339700 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-010057 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-024095 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-027223 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-091465 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002091712 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002100116 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002125205 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002135557 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-165191 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002176614 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-519916 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-232693 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002232412 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002319924 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002354232 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-008873 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-039770 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-091927 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003134461 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-230095 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-244419 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-283802 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003316556 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2003348324 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2004-023786 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004070606 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-163855 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004163855 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004173237 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-193843 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004193843 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004194233 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-328747 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004328747 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005051733 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-094107 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005094107 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005525600 | Aug 2005 | JP |
20080539669 | Nov 2008 | JP |
20100272920 | Dec 2010 | JP |
5283732 | Jul 2013 | JP |
1020080087047 | Sep 2008 | KR |
20100009384 | Jan 2010 | KR |
1020110007789 | Jan 2011 | KR |
1020120045131 | May 2012 | KR |
1020120128149 | Nov 2012 | KR |
94-10771 | May 1994 | WO |
95-14289 | May 1995 | WO |
97-09797 | Mar 1997 | WO |
97-33391 | Sep 1997 | WO |
98-53565 | Nov 1998 | WO |
99-03340 | Jan 1999 | WO |
99-39344 | May 1999 | WO |
99-45706 | Oct 1999 | WO |
99-62022 | Dec 1999 | WO |
00-00969 | Jan 2000 | WO |
00-13136 | Mar 2000 | WO |
00-56059 | Sep 2000 | WO |
01-54035 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0150665 | Jul 2001 | WO |
01-55889 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0197128 | Dec 2001 | WO |
200213138 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0219589 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0223883 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0249363 | Jun 2002 | WO |
0295727 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2003052598 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003102947 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2005017827 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005-027501 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005038778 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2006051043 | May 2006 | WO |
2006116394 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2009031082 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2010073236 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010135687 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011116309 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2013067439 | May 2013 | WO |
2013090462 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013090466 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013090467 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013163921 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014144101 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014153199 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014160324 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015013419 | Jan 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114666 (8 pages). |
Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2014 for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7009718 (8 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2015 for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-7015220 (19 pages). |
Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2015 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180051678.7 (27 pages). |
Park, J.H., et al., “Robust and fragile watermarking techniques for documents using bidirectional diagonal profiles,” Information and Communications Security: Third International Conference, Xian, China, Nov. 2001, pp. 483-494. |
Perez-Gonzalez, F., et al., “Approaching the capacity limit in image watermarking a perspective on coding techniques for data hiding applications,” Signal Processing, 6(81):1215-1238 Jun. 2001. |
Petitcolas, F., et al., “The blind pattern matching attack on watermark systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, Apr. 2003 (4 pages). |
Petitcolas, F.A.P., et al., “Attacks: on copyright marking systems,” Second Workshop on Information Hiding, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Portland, Oregon, pp. 218-238, Apr. 1998. |
Philips Research Liquid Audio Fraunhofer Institute, “Digital Audio Screening Technology for Phased Rollout,” Version 1.00, May 1999 (38 pages). |
Pytlak, J.,“Anti-piracy coding,” http://www.tele.com/pipermail/tig/2003-November/003842.html;; Nov. 2003 (2 pages). |
RSA Laboratories, “Frequently asked questions about today's cryptography,” Version 4.1, May 2000 (37 pages). |
Schneier, B., “Applied cryptography, second edition: protocols, algorithms and source code in C,” Oct. 1995 (10 pages). |
Seok, J., et al., “A novel audio watermarking algorithm for copyright protection of digital audio,” ETRI Journal, 24 (3):181-189, Jun. 2002. |
Shih, F.Y., et al., “Combinational, image watermarking in the spatial and frequency domains,” Pattern Recognition, 36:696-975, May 2002. |
Solanki, K., et al., “Robust image-adaptive data hiding: modeling, source coding and channel coding”, 41st Allerton Conference on Communications, Control and Computing, Oct. 2003 (10 pages). |
Spangler, T., “Social Science,” http://www.multichannel.com/content/social-science, Sep. 2011 (5 pages). |
Steinebach, M., et al., “StirMark benchmark: audio; watermarking attacks,” International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC 2001), Las Vegas, Nevada, Apr. 2001 (6 pages). |
Tanaka, K., et al., “Secret transmission method of character data in motion picture communication,” SPIE Visual Communications and Image Processing '91, 1605:646-649, 1991. |
Tsai, M.J., et al., “Wavelet packet and adaptive spatial transformation of watermark for digital image authentication,” IEEE Image Processing, 2000 International Conference, 1:450-453, 2000 (4 pages). |
Verance Corporation, “Confirmedia,” PowerPoint presentation made to National Association of Broadcasters, Apr. 24, 2001 (40 pages). |
Wang, X, et al., “Robust correlation of encrypted attack traffic through stepping stones by manipulation of interpacket delays,” Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on computer communications security, Oct. 27-30, 2003, Washington D.C., USA. |
Wolfgang, R., et al., “Perceptual watermarks for digital images and video,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(7):1108-1126, Jul. 1999. |
Xu, C., et al., “Applications of digital watermarking technology in audio signals,” Journal of Audio Eng. Soc., 10(47):805-812, Oct. 1999. |
Yeung, M. M., et al., “An invisible watermarking technique for image verification,” Image Processing, International Conference Proceedings, 2:680-683, Oct. 26-29, 1997. |
Zhao, J., “A WWW service to embed and prove digital copyright watermarks,” Proc. European Conf. on Multimedia Applications, Services and Techniques (ECMAST'96), May 1996 (15 pages). |
Zhao, J., “Applying digital watermarking techniques to online multimedia commerce,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Imaging Science, Systems and Applications (CISSA'97), Jun./Jul. 1997 (7 pages). |
Aris Technologies, Inc. “Audio Watermarking System to Screen Digital Audio Content for LCM Acceptance,” May 1999 (17 pages). |
Bangaleea, R., et al., “Performance improvement of spread spectrum spatial-domain watermarking scheme through diversity and attack characterisation,” IEEE Africon, pp. 293-298, 2002. |
Hartung, F., et al., “Watermarking of MPEG-2 encoded video without decoding and re-coding,” Proc. SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking 97, 3020:264-274, Feb. 1997. |
Hartung, F., et al., “Watermarking of uncompressed and compressed video,” Signal Processing, 3(66):283-301, May 1998. |
Kalker, T., et al., “System issues in digital image and video watermarking for copy protection,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, pp. 562-567, Jun. 1999. |
Kirovski, D., et al., “Multimedia content screening using a dual watermarking and fingerprinting system,” Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference, pp. 372-381, 2002. |
Kirovski, D., et al., “Multimedia content screening using a dual watermarking and fingerprinting system,”Multimedia '02 Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia, 2002 (11 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/029564, filed Mar. 14, 2014 (10 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 22, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031267, filed Aug. 9, 2006 (2 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/026322, filed Aug. 25, 2014 (12 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 8, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/028372, filed Mar. 14, 2014 (18 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 14, 2002 for International Application No. PCT/US2001/026505, filed Aug. 27, 2001 (2 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/066138, filed Nov. 20, 2012 (11 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 4, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/015615, filed Apr. 25, 2006 (5 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 14, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069308, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (10 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/063431, filed Nov. 2, 2012 (10 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 25, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069302, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (22 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051855, filed Sep. 15, 2011 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 13, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/025090, filed Jun. 27, 2006 (2 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 19, 2004 for International Application No. PCT/US2003/031816, filed Apr. 29, 2004 (3 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 29, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/015410, filed Apr. 21, 2006 (6 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 26, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/016812, filed Jul. 25, 2007 (6 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 11, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/047840, filed Jul. 23, 2014 (15 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 25, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/041166, filed Jun. 5, 2014 (10 pages). |
Jacobsmeyer, J., et al., “Introduction to error-control coding,” Pericle Communications Company, 2004 (16 pages). |
Kalker, T., et al., “A security risk for publicly available watermark detectors,” Proc. Benelux Info. Theory Symp., Veldhoven, The Netherlands, May 1998 (7 pages). |
Kang, X., et al., “A DWT-DFT composite watermarking scheme robust to both affine transform and JPEG compression,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 8(13):776-786, Aug. 2003. |
Kim, T.Y., et al., “An asymmetric watermarking system with many embedding watermarks corresponding to one detection watermark,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 3(11):375-377, Mar. 2004. |
Kirovski, D., et al., “Randomizing the replacement attack,” ICASSP, pp. 381-384, 2004. |
Kirovski, D., et al., “Robust spread-spectrum audio watermarking,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 3:1345-1348, 2001. |
Kirovski, D., et al., “Multimedia content; screening using a dual watermarking and fingerprinting system,” Multimedia '02 Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia, 2002 (11 pages). |
Kocher, P., et al., “Self-Protecting Digital Content: A Technical Report from the CRI Content Security Research Initiative,” Cryptography Research, Inc. (CRI), 2002-2003 (14 pages). |
Kutter, M., et al., “The watermark; copy attack,” Proc. of the SPIE: Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Content II, 3971:1-10, Jan. 2000. |
Kuznetsov, A.V., et al., “An error correcting scheme for defective memory,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 6(4):712-718, Nov. 1978 (7 pages). |
Lacy, J., et al., “Intellectual property protection systems and digital watermarking,” Proceedings: Information Hiding, Second International Workshop, Portland, Oregon, pp. 158-168, 1998. |
Lin, E.T., et al., “Detection of image alterations using semi-fragile watermarks,” Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference on Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents II, Jan. 2000 (12 pages). |
Lin, P.L., et al., “Robust transparent image watermarking system with spatial mechanisms,” The Journal of Systems and Software, 50:107-116, Feb. 2000. |
Lotspeich, J., “The Advanced Access Content System's Use of Digital Watermarking,” MCPS '06, Oct. 28, 2006, pp. 19-21. |
Lu, C.S., et al., “Oblivious cocktail watermarking by sparse code shrinkage: A regional-and global-based scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 4(2):209-224, Dec. 2000. |
Maehara, F., et al., “A proposal of multimedial home education terminal system based on flash-squeak OS,” Technical report of the institute of image information and television engineers, 28(43):21-24, Jul. 2004. |
Mason, A. J., et al., “User requirements for watermarking in broadcast applications,” IEEE Conference Publication, International Broadcasting Convention (BC 2000), Amsterdam, Sep. 8-12, 2000 (7 pages). |
Miller, M.L. et al. “Computing the probability of false watermark detection,” Published in the Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Hiding, Dresden, Germany, Sep. 29-Oct. 1, 1999. |
Miller, M.L. et al. “Informed embedding: exploiting image and detector information during watermark insertion,” IEEE Conference Publication, Image Processing, (3):1-4, Sep. 2000. |
Mintzer, F., et al., “If one watermark is good, are more better?,” Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP, 4:2067-2069, Mar. 1999. |
Mobasseri, B.G., et al. “Content authentication and tamper detection in digital video,” Image Processing Proceedings, International Conference, 1:458-461, 2000. |
Moulin, P., et al., “Detection-theoretic analysis of desynchronization attacks in watermarking, ” Technical Report MSR-TR-2002-24, Microsoft Corporation, Mar. 2002. |
Muranoi, R., et al., “Video retrieval method using shotlD for copyright protection systems,” Proc. SPIE Multimedia Storage and Archiving Systems III, 3527:245-252, Nov. 1998. |
Nikolaidis, N., et al., “Watermark detection: benchmarking perspectives,” 2002 IEEE Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2002 (4 pages). |
Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2014 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180051690.8 (14 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2014 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-036990 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-508985 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-508985 (8 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2011 for European Patent Application No. 03774648.4 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated May 1, 2013 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114667 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated May 8, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-522802 (4 pages). |
Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114667 (8 pages). |
“Advanced Access Content System (AACS), Pre-recorded Video Book,” Revision 0.951, Sep. 2009 (86 pages). |
“Civolution's 2nd screen synchronisation solution wins CSI product of the year 2011 award at IBC,” IBC Press Release, Hall 2—Stand C30, Sep. 2011 (2 pages). |
“Content Protection—Self Protecting Digital Content,” http://www.cryptography.com/technology/spdc/index.html, May 2010 (1 page). |
“Microsoft response to CfP for technology solutions to screen digital audio content for LCM acceptance,” Microsoft Corporation, May 23, 1999 (9 pages). |
“Red Bee and Civolution develop companion app for FX UK,” http://www.digitaltveurope.net/19981/red-bee-and-civolution-develop-companion-app-for-fx-uk, Jan. 2012 (2 pages). |
“Task AC122-copy protection for distribution services,” Http://acad.bg/WISE/english/rd/partners/acts/areal/ac122-t.html, Jul. 1, 1997 (2 pages). |
Adelsbach, A., et al., “Proving Ownership of Digital Content,” Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Information Hiding, 1768:117-133, Sep. 1999. |
Aggarwal, A., et al., “Multi-Layer Grid Embeddings,” Foundations of Computer Science, 26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 85:186-196, Oct. 1985. |
Barreto, P.S.L.M., et al. “Toward Secure Public-Key Blockwise Fragile Authentication Watermarking,” IEEE Proceedings Vision, Image, and Signal Processing, 149(2):57-62, Apr. 2002. |
Baudy, S., et al., “Estimation of geometric distortions in digital watermarking,” IEEE International Conference on Watermarking, (2):885-888, Sep. 2002. |
Boney, L., et al., “Digital Watermarks for Audio Signals,” Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota, Mar. 1996 (4 pages). |
Cappellini, V., et al. “Robust Frame-based Watermarking for Digital Video,” Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Sep. 2001 (5 pages). |
Caronni, G., “Assuring Ownership Rights for Digital; Images,” Proceedings of reliable IT systems VIS 95, Vieweg Publishing Company, Germany, 1995 (10 pages). |
Chen, B et al., “Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47(4):1423-1443, May 2001. |
Chou, J., et al., “A Robust Blind Watermarking Scheme based on Distributed Source Coding Principles,” Multimedia! 2000 Proceedings of the eighth ACM international conference on multimedia, Los Angeles, California, 2000 (8 pages). |
Chou, J., et al., “A Robust Optimization Solution to the Data Hiding Problem using Distributed Source Coding Principles,” Pro. SPIE, 3971, San Jose, California, Jan. 2000 (10 pages). |
Cinea, Inc., “Forensic watermarking deterring video piracy,” 2004, (9 pages). [http://www.cinea.com/whitepapers/forensic—watermarking.pdf];. |
Costa, M., “Writing on Dirty Paper,” IEEE Trans. on Info. Theory, 29(3):439-441, May 1983. |
Cox, I. J., et al., “Some general methods for tampering with watermarks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(4): 587-593, May 1998. |
Coxford, A., et al., “Advanced Mathematics: A Preparation for Calculus, Second Edition,” Harcourt Brace Jovanovish, Inc., 1978 (14 pages). |
Das, et al., “Distributed Priority Queues on Hybercube Architectures,” IEEE, 1996, pp. 620-627. |
Davidson, M.F., “Music File Filter,” Sony Music, New York, May 23, 1999 (2 pages). |
Digimarc Corporation, “Digimarc Watermarking Guide,” 1999 (22 pages). |
Dittmann, J., “Combining digital watermarks and collusion secure fingerprints for customer copy monitoring,” Proc. IEEE Seminar on Secure Images and Image Authentication, Apr. 2000 (6 pages). |
Dittmann, J., et al., “Combining digital watermarks and collusion secure fingerprints for digital images,” Proc. SPIE 3657:171-182, Jan. 1999 (12 pages). |
Epp, L.W., et al., “Generalized scattering matrices for unit cell characterization of grid amplifiers and device de-embedding,” IEEE, 2:1288-1291, Jun. 1995. |
European Search Report dated Apr. 12, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 07836262.1 filed Jul. 25, 2007 (12 pages). |
European Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 12150742.0, filed Oct. 7, 2003 (5 pages). |
European Search Report dated Nov. 10, 2010 for European Patent Application No. 03774648.4, filed Oct. 7, 2003 (5 pages). |
European Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06785709.4, filed Jun. 27, 2006 (5 pages). |
European Search Report dated Oct. 24, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06758537.2, filed Apr. 21, 2006 (6 pages). |
European Search Report dated Oct. 31, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06758577.8, filed Apr. 25, 2006 (6 pages). |
European Search Report dated Oct. 14, 2014 for European Patent Application No. 14173053.1, filed Oct. 7, 2003 (5 pages). |
European Search Report dated Apr. 15, 2015 for European Patent Application No. 12846172.0, filed Nov. 2, 2012 (8 pages). |
Furon, T., et al., “An asymmetric watermarking; method,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 4(51):981-995, Apr. 2003. |
Guth, H.J. et al., “Error-and collusion-secure fingerprinting for digital data,” Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Information Hiding, LNCS 1768:134-145, Sep./Oct. 1999. |
Hartung, F., et al., “Digital watermarking of MPEG-2 coded video in the bitstream domain,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 4:2621-2624, Apr. 1997. |
Heegard, C., et al., “On the capacity of computer memory with defects,” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, 5(IT-29):731-739, Sep. 1983. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 28, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/020282, filed Mar. 12, 2015 (7 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 1, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/052973, filed Aug. 27, 2014 (16 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 12, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/035474, filed Apr. 25, 2014 (17 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/035539, filed Apr. 25, 2014 (16 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 24, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051857, filed Sep. 15, 2011 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 8, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069306, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (12 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 14, 1998 for International Application No. PCT/US1998/009587, filed May 12, 1998 (3 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140270338 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61785149 | Mar 2013 | US |