Patent Grant
11446140
The invention relates to atrio-ventricular valve (mitral valve or tricuspid valve) replacement devices for functionally replacing the corresponding native atrio-ventricular valve, and, in more detail, to a transcatheter atrio-ventricular valve replacement device or transcatheter atrio-ventricular valve prosthesis which allows implantation by means of a percutaneous approach, that is, a minimally invasive approach on a beating heart.
Normally the mitral valve allows blood to flow freely from the left atrial chamber to the left ventricular chamber during diastole when the heart is relaxed and prevents the backflow of blood from the left ventricle to the left atrium during systole when the heart contracts. The mitral valve or mitral valve structure has a generally circumferential wall structure forming a connection channel or through opening between the atrial and ventricular chambers of the heart and including a circumferential valve annulus, valve leaflets opening and closing the connection channel/through opening at a position close to the valve annulus, a generally circumferential chord structure (chordae tendinae) connected between the valve leaflets and generally circumferential papillary muscle(s), and said circumferential papillary muscle(s).
Proper opening and closing of the mitral valve leaflets depends on the coordinated function of its individual components i.e., the mitral annulus, the anterior and posterior mitral valve leaflets, chordae tendineae, papillary muscles, and the left atrial and left ventricular (LV) walls in continuity with the leaflets, and papillary muscles, respectively.
Mitral valve disease can take the form of mitral stenosis or mitral regurgitation. Mitral stenosis results when the valve does not open fully during diastole. In this case, higher than normal pressures are required to push blood forward into the left ventricle. Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a condition whereby the mitral valve does not close properly when the left ventricle contracts during left ventricular contraction. As a result, there is abnormal leaking of blood from the left ventricle into the left atrium.
Mitral pathology may basically be treated by valve repair or valve replacement. The treatment of mitral steno sis was revolutionized in 1984 and 1985 when Inoue and Lock developed percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. Echocardiography is essential for patient screening and predicting the likelihood of a successful percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy (PBMV). Nevertheless, predicting the outcome of percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy remains somewhat limited. In cases where the mitral valve leaflets are severely restricted, thickened, and/or calcified and the submitral apparatus is severely thickened and/or calcified, surgical mitral valve replacement or repair needs to be considered. Mitral valve surgery is also indicated in patients with concomitant moderate to severe mitral regurgitation or left atrial thrombus. Although there is some data comparing the outcomes of PBMV to surgical commissurotomy for patients with mitral stenosis, there is a paucity of data comparing the outcomes of PBMV to surgical mitral valve replacement. The outcomes of PBMV were just as good or better than surgical commissurotomy in patients who were candidates for PBMV.
Mitral regurgitation can result from an abnormality of the mitral valve leaflets or chordae tendinae, in which case it is called primary or degenerative mitral valve disease. On the other hand, mitral regurgitation can occur in the setting of normal mitral valve leaflets and chordae tendinae; known as secondary or functional mitral regurgitation. In this case, a dilated left ventricle from ischemic or non-ischemic origin can result in mitral annular dilatation or a change in position of the papillary muscles and lead to abnormal closing of the mitral valve leaflets.
Mitral regurgitation is an important health problem. It affects approximately 9% of the population above 75 years old. Of the 5 million patients suffering from heart failure in the United States, 15-20% are found to have moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. The occurrence of mitral regurgitation early after a myocardial infarction (MI) is reported to be 50% (mild in 38%, moderate-severe in 12%). Short- and long-term survival is worse when mitral regurgitation of any severity accompanies heart failure or a myocardial infarction.
Although surgical mitral valve repair or replacement remains the standard of care for patients with significant mitral valve disease, the European Heart Survey demonstrated that up to one-half of patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation do not undergo surgery. Compared with those who underwent surgery, these patients were typically older, had impairment of left ventricular function, and had more noncardiac diseases than did patients undergoing valve surgery. Whether denying surgery in these patients was justified or not, the challenges of managing these patients will only increase in the coming years as the number of patients considered for surgery continues to rise.
Although surgical mitral valve repair and replacement can be associated with an acceptable mortality risk approaching 1% and 6%, respectively, it requires a sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass that can be associated with significant complications. More specifically, the occurrence of any major complication (e.g. operative mortality, myocardial infarction, tamponade, septicemia, stroke, re-operation, renal failure, deep wound infection, ventilatory support >24 hours and GI bleed) can be as high as 12% and 25% for mitral valve repair and replacement, respectively (STS database 2002).
Previous data published from the mid 1990's suggested that surgical mitral valve repair had better short- and long-term survival chances than mitral valve replacement (Circulation 1995; 91:1022). It is important to note that the Starr Edwards valve was the most frequently utilized mechanical valve in that study. Since then, there has been a better understanding of the techniques for surgical mitral valve replacement. For instance, preservation of the chords and maintaining the submitral apparatus intact during mitral valve replacement has been associated with improved indices of left ventricular end systolic function (Circulation 1992; 86:1718-1726). In addition, the use of bioprosthetic over mechanical mitral valves has been shown to reduce the incidence of valve-related complications such as bleeding (JACC 200; 36:1152-1158). In a propensity-matched analysis, the probability of re-operation was higher after mitral valve repair than mitral valve replacement.
Mitral valve annuloplasty is the cornerstone of mitral valve repair. Annuloplasty may be used together with leaflet repair (resection, sliding annuloplasty) or chordal reconstruction (transposition, artificial chords). For repair of a degenerative mitral valve, failure to include an annuloplasty procedure negatively affects the long-term results of the procedure.
The Alfieri procedure involves suturing the free edges of the middle anterior and middle posterior leaflets of the mitral valve. This produces a double orifice mitral valve. The procedure can be used to treat degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation Like leaflet repair, the Alfieri procedure requires concomitant annuloplasty to avoid repair failure.
The clinical benefits and durability of mitral valve repair in the setting of severe functional mitral regurgitation are controversial; especially in the setting of severe left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction (JACC 2008; 52:319-26) (JACC 2005; 45:381-7) (Circulation 1998; 98:Suppl II:124-7) (Sem Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 14:133-6). Furthermore, the respective role of mitral valve repair and replacement in this setting is also unclear. Although mitral valve replacement with chordal preservation is associated with a higher operative mortality than mitral valve repair, replacement offers a significantly lower failure rate. The failure rate of mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation can be as high as 30% at 1-2 years follow-up. Most of the literature pertaining to secondary mitral regurgitation and surgical therapy is based on mitral valve repair rather than mitral valve replacement. It can be hypothesized that the lack of mortality benefit associated with mitral valve repair is in some ways related to the poor durability results with mitral valve repair than mitral valve replacement.
In an effort to address the challenges ahead, researchers have been developing new options for a rapidly growing pool of patients in whom heart valve replacement or repair may be beneficial, but for whom surgical intervention is considered too high risk.
The goal of transcatheter valve therapy is to provide a treatment modality that is less invasive, associated with equal or greater efficacy compared with standard surgery, and is potentially safer compared to more invasive procedures.
To overcome limitations of surgical mitral valve implantation, several techniques have been proposed for minimally invasive or endovascular valve implantation in the mitral and/or tricuspid position.
Most catheter delivered devices are based on stents to enable collapsation and re-expansion, anchoring and sealing contact with the anatomy. Stents, whether balloon- or self-expandable, anchor by inner radial force on the anatomy. However the atrio-ventricular heart valves do not offer a substantially cylindrical location like a vessel or an aortic or pulmonary valve. Consequently anchoring by inner radial force is unstable. Furthermore, the valve annulus usually is very supple and extends significantly under inner radial force which can be deleterious to the anchoring and to the heart function. In addition the size and shape of the mitral valve annulus varies considerably in diseased valves. Therefore many different diameters for prosthetic replacement devices would be necessary.
Several authors have described alternative ways to anchor a valve prosthesis in the atrio-ventricular position. Some rely on a specific shape enabling a firm anchoring without the need of inner radial force like Hill et al. (US20100036479) describing a cage like construction filling the atrium and enabling to rest on the atrial wall over its complete surface. However, this technique will considerably impair atrial function, because atrial contraction is impeded. Quadri et al. (US2009306768) and Lamphere et al. (US20080221672) suggested the use of hooks engaging the valve annulus. Rowe et al. (US20090276040) described both a specific shape and a tether that can be anchored in the ventricular wall to resist dislodgment. Likewise Lutter (DE102007043830 A1) et al. describe a prosthesis which is anchored by broad extensions in the left atrium and held in place by countertraction through fixation in the left ventricular apex. In contrast Thambar et al. (US20080243245) describe a prosthesis which is anchored on the ventricular side of the mitral valve and held in place by countertraction through the left atrial wall. Both Palmaz et al. (WO03003943) and Leonhardt et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,957,949) suggest a prosthesis which is fixed in the mitral valve annulus by radial force, supported by some longitudinal compression through atrial and ventricular extensions. A different approach is presented by Laske et al. (WO 2008091515) who describe a two double barrel stent design, fixed in the mitral annulus by radial force.
While those authors describe means to achieve anchoring of a collapsible valve device, there is no clear description on how they achieve sealing contact to avoid per-prosthetic leakages. Furthermore there is no mention on how the prosthesis can accommodate different ring sizes and shapes.
Furthermore, to avoid pushing the anterior mitral leaflet in the outflow tract and obstructing the blood flow out of the ventricle, such authors describe specific requirements. Quadri's device is anchored on the annulus and it does not reach inside the ventricle between the mitral leaflets but rather protrudes proximally inside the left atrium creating a no-flow zone and the risk of thrombus. Part of the free floating anterior leaflet which is not fixed by the hooks on the ventricular side of the stent may even protrude into the left ventricular outflow tract causing SAM. Rowe's device requires a distal end smaller than the proximal end.
All of the devices described above share the same potentially unresolved issues.
Embodiments of a transcatheter atrio-ventricular valve prosthesis for functional replacement of an atrio-ventricular valve in a connection channel, having a circumferential connection channel wall structure, between atrial and ventricular chambers of a heart, comprise an inner device to be disposed in the interior of the connection channel, the inner device having a circumferential support structure which is radially expandable and having a valve attached to the circumferential support structure, and an outer device to be disposed on the exterior of the connection channel, wherein the outer device at least partly extends around the inner device in a radial distance to the inner device, wherein the inner and outer devices form a clamping mechanism for clamping the circumferential connection channel wall structure therebetween. Further embodiments of the invention provide methods for implanting a transcatheter atrio-ventricular valve prosthesis.
Exemplary techniques and apparatuses, including prostheses, for practicing embodiments of the invention are shown in the attached figures and the descriptive appearing thereon. The features described herein can be used in various combinations, which are intended to be encompassed hereby. The disclosure of the embodiments as disclosed herein is not intended to restrict the invention to those specific embodiments, but to encompass all embodiments of the concepts addressed herein.
In the figures, the same reference signs are used to identify same and similar parts and elements.
Implantation of a transcatheter atrio-ventricular valve prosthesis (mitral valve or tricuspid valve prosthesis) on a beating heart can be achieved by a minimally invasive approach in a mammal. This specification describes procedures and apparatuses, including the valve prosthesis itself, to insert and deploy the valve prosthesis and to anchor it by attachment to locations inside the heart.
According to an embodiment, the invention provides a transcatheter atrio-ventricular valve prosthesis. According to another embodiment, the invention provides a method for implanting a transcatheter atrio-ventricular valve prosthesis. Further embodiments of the invention are described below.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a transcatheter atrio-ventricular valve prosthesis for functional replacement of an atrio-ventricular valve in a connection channel, having a circumferential connection channel wall structure, between atrial and ventricular chambers of a heart is provided, comprising an inner device to be disposed in the interior of the connection channel, the inner device having a circumferential support structure or circumferential support body which is radially expandable and having a valve attached to the circumferential support structure, and an outer device to be disposed on the exterior side of the connection channel, wherein the outer device at least partly extends around (circumferentially around) the inner device in a radial distance to the inner device, wherein the inner device, for example the circumferential support structure of the inner device, and the outer device form a clamping mechanism for clamping the circumferential connection channel wall structure of the connection channel therebetween.
The circumferential support structure defines an inner channel or inner through opening forming a replacement channel for functionally replacing or re-enforcing the (native) connection channel between the atrial chamber and the ventricular chamber. In the implanted condition, the circumferential support structure, for example, circumferentially and continuously abuts the inner periphery of the circumferential connection channel wall structure. The (new) valve is fixedly arranged in the interior of the circumferential support structure and, thus, within said replacement channel, and is fixedly attached to the circumferential support structure so as to be able to take over and correspondingly replace the function of the native valve, that is, so as to be able to appropriately open and close the replacement channel to appropriately allow blood flow therethrough between the atrial chamber and the ventricular chamber, between which it is (or is to be) implanted.
According to another embodiment of the invention, a transcatheter atrio-ventricular valve prosthesis for functional replacement of an atrio-ventricular valve in a connection channel, having a circumferential connection channel wall structure, between the atrial chamber and the ventricular chamber of a heart is provided, comprising an inner device to be disposed in the interior of the connection channel, the inner device having a circumferential support structure which is radially expandable, and having a valve attached to the circumferential support structure, wherein the circumferential support structure of the inner device is of tubular shape and extends along an axis and has two axial ends, and an outer device to be disposed on the exterior of the connection channel, wherein the outer device at least partly extends around the inner device in a radial distance to the inner device, and wherein the inner and outer devices form a clamping mechanism for clamping the circumferential connection channel wall structure therebetween, wherein the outer device comprises a ring, for extending circumferentially around the circumferential connection channel wall structure, arranged between and in a distance to the axial ends of the inner device, wherein the outer device further comprises an anchor member having one or more anchor parts, such as one or more barbs and/or one or more hooks, to penetrate into the circumferential connection channel wall structure at a position at or close to the ring, the anchor member comprising an eye, through which the ring extends to thereby be anchored on the circumferential connection channel wall structure at this position by the anchor member.
The (native) connection channel between the native arterial and ventricular chambers (which may be the left chambers in case of (functional) mitral valve replacement or right chambers in case of (functional) tricuspid valve replacement) is defined by the circumferential and/or peripheral connection channel wall structure provided by (the tissue of) the native valve leaflets, the native valve annulus of the native atrial-ventricular valve and, in an embodiment, may also be the adjacent muscular tissue, the generally circumferential chord structure (chordae tendinae) between the valve leaflets and the generally circumferential papillary muscle(s), and said papillary muscle(s), wherein the inner and outer devices are provided such as to (at least partly) circumferentially clamp said connection channel wall structure therebetween. In the area of the native valve leaflets and the native valve annulus, the circumferential connection channel wall structure forms a substantially closed circumferential connection channel wall, and in the area of the chordae tendinae the circumferential connection channel wall structure forms a longitudinally slotted and, hence, more radially opened circumferential wall structure. The inner device is, for example, to be arranged within the circumferential connection channel wall (formed by the valve annulus and the leaflets), thereby achieving an improved sealing and fixation function. Also the outer device is, for example, to be arranged around the mentioned circumferential connection channel wall (formed by the valve annulus and the valve leaflets), and/or the outer device may also be arranged around the circumferential connection channel wall structure in the area of the chordae tendinae and/or in the area of the papillary muscle(s) in as far as the inner device extends into between these/this area(s). According to a further extended approach, part of the respective atrium, for example that part of the respective atrium which is adjacent to the corresponding atrio-ventricular valve to be functionally replaced, may be considered to also form part of the corresponding connection channel so that according to this extended approach the (native) circumferential connection channel wall structure which is to be clamped between the outer and inner devices is formed by a part of the corresponding atrium wall. In this respect, the outer device may also be arranged around the corresponding atrium.
The transcatheter atrio-ventricular valve prosthesis is preferably collapsible to fit inside a delivery catheter and re-expandable to be functional inside the heart cavity. In this respect, the circumferential support structure of the inner device can be brought in a collapsed condition to be then implanted in percutaneous manner, and can then be expanded when being in its final implanted position within the (native) connection channel. The circumferential support structure can be a stent-like component, and can be, for example, self expandable or balloon expandable. It can be made of nitinol or stainless steel or any material enabling properties desired for the application (e.g., biocompatibility, elasticity, yield strength, fatigue resistance, corrosion resistance). It can be laser-cut or assembled from a wire, or produced by other methods. For example, the circumferential support structure can be formed by a mesh-like wire structure of either a shape-memory material, such as nitinol, thereby forming a self-expandable mesh structure, or of a non-shape-memory material, such as stainless steel, thereby forming a non-self-expandable mesh structure which has to be expanded by an additional or separate expanding means, such as by an internal and expandable balloon which is inserted into an interior of the initially collapsed circumferential support structure and which can be inflated and deflated to expand the circumferential support structure and to be then removed therefrom, respectively.
Further, the circumferential support structure is, for example, of a tubular shape (for example, of a tubular mesh shape) which is collapsible and re-expandable to its tubular shape.
The expandability and corresponding collapsibility of the circumferential support structure (the valve attached thereto is correspondingly collapsible and deployable) allows delivery of the inner device by means of a catheter forwarded to the atrio-ventricular valve, for example, via the corresponding atrial chamber or ventricular chamber.
The outer device can also be forwarded by means of a catheter to the atrio-ventricular valve, for example via the atrial chamber or the ventricular chamber, wherein the inner and outer devices may be forwarded simultaneously or one after another via a respective (other) one of the atrial and ventricular chambers or via the respective same of the atrial and ventricular chambers.
The (new, replacing or non-native) valve attached to the circumferential support member can be made of biological tissue, for example, of pericardium, or it can be an artificial valve made of a synthetic material, such as of a plastic film material, for example a PE film material. The non-native valve may be provided as a flap valve arranged in an interior of the circumferential support structure of the inner device, and having one or a plurality of (co-acting) flaps.
When the circumferential support structure is in its finally implanted position, for example between the native valve leaflets and/or the native valve annulus, and will be expanded, the circumferential support structure radially and inwardly contacts against the inner periphery of the circumferential or peripheral connection channel wall structure, for example against the inner periphery of the connection channel wall formed by the native valve annulus and the native valve leaflets. In this respect, the circumferential support structure may be expandable to merely (in general) abut against the inner periphery without causing inner pressure as such. In this case, the active clamping action can be caused by an outer device which is a contractible device and which then can radially and inwardly contract the circumferential connection channel wall structure against the inner device. It is also possible that the outer device is generally not radially contractible, and the clamping force can be actively provided by the inner device, that is, by the expandable circumferential support structure radially expanded to press the (native) circumferential connection channel wall structure against the inner periphery of the outer device. It is also possible that both the inner device, for example its circumferential support structure, and the outer device are expandable and contractible, respectively, such that both provide for such radial forces so as to be able to actively press against the circumferential connection channel wall structure from the inner side and the outer side thereof.
The outer device may be one or more collapsible and correspondingly (re-)expandable or formable, for example circumferentially closed, rings or tubular members, for example in form of one or a plurality of snares, which extend around, for example completely around, the (circumference of the) inner device and can be arranged around, for example completely around, the native connection channel and, hence, the outer circumference of the corresponding circumferential connection channel wall structure. Accordingly, by using a ring, the clamping mechanism can continuously (that is, without interruptions) circumferentially clamp the connection channel wall structure. The outer device may be a closed ring (as shown in e.g.,
A wire, which may also be a ribbon or a rope, may be used as material for the outer device, the wire forming the above-mentioned ring around the circumferential connection channel wall structure. The wire or wire material may be flexible and non-elastic, but may also be flexible and elastic so as to be able to always provide an elastic clamping force against the inner device.
In general, the outer device may be non-elastically contractible up to any appropriate inner diameter, or the outer device may be elastically contractible up to an inner diameter which, for example is equal or smaller than the outer diameter of the inner device, so as to ensure an elastic clamping force against the circumferential connection channel wall structure when being implanted.
The wire or wire material as such may be linearly forwarded to the atrio-ventricular valve through a catheter and may be wound circumferentially around the outer periphery of the circumferential connectional channel wall structure to form the outer device in the shape of one or more rings such as snare rings. Such rings may be arranged in a respective distance to each other along an axial extension of the inner device along the direction of the connection channel/through opening formed by native atrio-ventricular valve. The wire ring can be easily further contracted to correspondingly contract the connection channel and circumferential connection channel wall structure radially inwardly against the inner device and the circumferential support structure thereof. Thereby, a tight and thereby sealed and reliable circumferential connection between the circumferential support structure with the (new/replacing) valve attached thereto and the inner periphery/circumference of the circumferential connection channel wall structure can be achieved. In this respect, as mentioned above, the inner device with its circumferential support structure may be arranged within the native valve annulus or at an interior position close thereto and in-between the native valve leaflets, and the outer device may be arranged around the exterior of the native valve leaflets close to the native valve annulus to thereby circumferentially and tightly clamp the native valve leaflets, which form part of the connection channel and, thus, of the connection channel wall structure thereof, between the inner and outer devices, thereby providing for safe and reliable seal as well as fixation functions. As mentioned above, the inner device and/or the outer device may also and/or additionally be provided on the inner and outer, respectively, peripheries of further elements of the circumferential connection channel wall structure, such as within and around, respectively, the periphery of the chordae tendinae, the periphery of the papillary muscle(s), and the periphery of the atrial wall.
The outer device, for example the ring, such as the wire ring or ribbon ring, may be of a shape-memory material (e.g., Nitinol) so as to be able to create a contracting force around the native leaflet and inner device, without requirement of any externally applied cinching force. The shape memory material can be characterized by its transition temperature (Af temperature) separating the cold, deformable state (martensitic phase) from the warm state (austenitic phase) where the component springs back to its original shape. The Af temperature of the shape memory material could be set in such a range (e.g., between 40° C. and 60° C.) that the outer device is inserted into position in the anatomy in its cold, deformable state (martensitic phase) so as to enable delivery through the tortuosities of the vasculature and adequate positioning without resistance. It could then be heated beyond the Af temperature, for instance by an electric current, so as to conform to its original shape in its warm state (austenitic phase). Its original shape could be set in such a way that upon recovering this shape after cold deformation and upon heating, a freeze mechanism like a ratchet or anchoring becomes active for instance enabling the two ends of the outer device to become connected. This feature would enable the outer device to maintain its shape and position despite partially cooling down again after the heating action is stopped.
The inner device and the outer device may be separated from each other and may be not in a physical contact with each other. However, the inner and outer devices may also include projections projecting toward each other and penetrating the tissue of the circumferential connection channel wall structure clamped in-between, wherein the penetrating projections of the inner and outer devices may come in contact with the respective other one of the inner and outer devices.
The inner device, for example its circumferential support structure, extends along an axis along the through opening therethrough (following the direction of the native connection channel or through opening through the native atrio-ventricular valve), and the outer device, for example provided as a ring, may be arranged at a position along said axis, that is between the axial ends of the inner device, for example between the ends of the circumferential support structure, to thereby be arranged in a distance (axial distance) from these ends. The inner device, for example its circumferential support structure, may have an elongate shape so that said axis may be the longitudinal axis and the ends may be the longitudinal ends.
The inner and outer devices may also include means for engaging the circumferential connection channel wall structure from the respective inner and outer peripheries thereof. In this respect, the inner device, for example its circumferential support structure, may comprise barbs, hooks, anchor part(s), or other projections for penetrating into the circumferential connection channel wall structure from the interior thereof. Correspondingly, the outer device may include such projections for correspondingly penetrate into the circumferential connection channel wall structure.
On the other hand, the inner device may also be free of projections at or on its outer surface (outer circumferential surface).
Further, the outer device formed by a wire or ribbon may also be at least partially interwoven into the chordae tendinae structure to thereby internally extend therearound, but still in a radial distance to the inner device and its circumferential support structure arranged on the inner periphery of the circumferential connection channel wall structure.
The inner device, for example its circumferential support structure, may be provided with an outer circumferential or peripheral indentation, for example a groove, for example with a V-shaped or U-shaped cross-section, and the outer device may comprise a closed or open ring engaging the indentation, for example the groove, with the connection wall channel structure clamped therebetween. The width of the groove, for example of the U-shaped groove, may be substantially adapted/substantially correspond to the cross-sectional dimension of the ring (ring wall) or may be slightly greater such as to still allow tissue of the corresponding wall structure portion of the circumferential connection channel wall structure to be pressed into the groove following the groove's cross-section, for example the U-shaped cross-section thereon, and laterally pressed against the lateral walls of the groove, and for example additionally pressed against the bottom/base of the groove, for example pressed against the base and/or laterally pressed against the legs of the U-shaped cross-section. The circumferential groove may be a continuously circumferentially extending groove or may extend circumferentially in an interrupted manner. The groove may be formed by (between) adjacent rips which radially protrude from the outer surface of the inner device (such as from its circumferential support structure) and which circumferentially, for example in a continuous or interrupted manner, extend around the inner device (such as around its circumferential support structure). The groove may also be formed by adjacent rows of separated projections (such as bosses) which radially protrude outwardly from the outer surface of the inner device (such as from the outer surface of the circumferential support structure). The groove may also be formed as circumferentially extending (for example in a continuous manner) recess provided in the otherwise smooth or projection-free outer surface of the inner device (such as of the circumferential support structure).
The inner device, for example its circumferential support structure, may be provided with an outer circumferential projection (rib-like projection) as the outer circumferential indentation, and the outer device may comprise one or two rings arranged adjacent to and (in case of two rings) on opposite (axial) sides of the outer circumferential projection.
The inner device, for example its circumferential support structure, may be provided, on its outer periphery, with a compressible material or a compressible structure (the compressible material/structure may be different from the material of the circumferential support structure), such as a foam material, for example as a coating or coating structure or surface structure/material, wherein the outer device, for example the ring shaped outer device, then may locally compress said compressible material, for example along the circumference of the ring of the outer device, to thereby form a corresponding (circumferential) groove in the compressible material.
The inner device may further have a funnel shape to approach the funnel shape of the connection channel/through opening through the native valve annulus and native valve leaflets of the atrio-ventricular valve in the area of the native valve annulus.
The implantation procedure may be carried out under various visualization means, such as: angiography, echography (Trans Esophageal Echo, Trans Thoracic Echo, Intra Cardiac Echo), MRI.
The catheter(s) for forwarding the inner and outer devices may, for example, be inserted by any of the following paths for treatment of the mitral valve: 1) over an arterial retrograde approach entering the heart cavity over the aorta, 2) through a venous access and through a puncture through the inter atrial septum (trans-septal approach), 3) over a puncture through the apex of the heart (trans-apical approach) or 4) over a puncture through the atrial wall from outside the heart.
The catheter(s) for forwarding the inner and outer devices may, for example, be inserted by any of the following paths for treatment of the tricuspid valve: 1) over an arterial retrograde approach entering the heart cavity over the pulmonary artery following a surgical access of the later, 2) through a venous access, 3) over a puncture through the apex of the heart (trans-apical approach) or 4) over a puncture through the atrial wall from outside the heart.
A possible access for delivering the outer device, for example the wire, ring or snare, is an arterial access (e.g., the femoral artery through a puncture in the groin). A guide-wire may be advanced over the aorta through the aortic valve inside the left ventricle. Over the guide-wire, a guiding catheter can be advanced. The catheter may be pre-shaped on its distal end with an angle of approximately 90° in such a way that it enables positioning of the guide-wire in the sub-annular groove (the space bellow the mitral annulus and between the ventricular wall and the posterior leaflet). Over the guide-wire and inside the guiding catheter, a second pre-shaped catheter can be advanced that will, upon exiting the guiding catheter, position itself around the posterior leaflet inside the sub-annular groove. Advancing the guide-wire inside that pre-shaped catheter allows it to travel around the posterior and the anterior mitral leaflet. A second lumen inside the guiding catheter (for example in form of a second catheter, or a second catheter) allows positioning of a snare to catch the guide-wire after its loop around the native valve leaflets, whereby the native valve leaflets are caught in a lasso manner.
Optionally a catheter can be threaded over the guide-wire to position an anchor (member) inside the ventricular wall or the annulus close to selected areas like the middle of the posterior leaflet. This anchor (member) allows maintenance of the relative height of the guide-wire so as to avoid grabbing the native leaflet too low. It also allows the apparatus to favor the final position of the stent-valve, that is, the inner device with its circumferential support structure and valve, within the mitral annulus plane close to the posterior wall so as for instance to grab a greater length of the posterior leaflet.
In embodiments, the guide-wire can be exchanged for a different kind of lasso with additional features (e.g., greater contact surface, barbs on its surface, shape memory). In addition, if the custom made lasso does not already provide for it, a stopping device can be advanced so as to close the loop and freeze it at a given circumference optimal for stent-valve anchoring.
The outer device, for example formed as a ring, such as a wire ring or snare ring, may be positioned around the native leaflets in such a way that it wraps those leaflets around the deployed inner device. The ring can be positioned at different heights, wherein a (height) position providing an improved sealing function may be seen to be a position as close as possible to the native valve annulus. In this regard, the native leaflets are used to anchor the atrio-ventricular (mitral) valve prosthesis as well as to achieve peri-prosthetic sealing. Preferably, the ring is inserted around the native valve annulus so as to be positioned above the chordae tendinae to provide an improved sealing function.
The outer device, for example, formed as a ring, such as a wire ring or snare ring, may be fixed into place, and thus remain attached inside the heart upon completion of the implantation of the atrio-ventricular (mitral) valve prosthesis. Alternatively, the wire ring or snare ring may be used to position the native leaflets in a selected area to activate an anchoring mechanism, and may be subsequently removed. That is, in some embodiments, the wire ring or snare ring may be used only during the implantation procedure.
According to an aspect of the invention, the outer device, for example in addition to the ring thereof, may further comprise one or more staples arranged around the periphery/circumference of the inner device and each having a base member arranged in a radial distance to and outwardly of the inner device to clamp the circumferential connection channel wall structure between the base member and the inner device and each having penetration legs for penetrating the circumferential connection channel wall structure and engaging the inner device, for example the circumferential support member thereof, for being fixed thereon and for providing the clamping force between the base member and the inner device.
According to an aspect of the invention, for example in addition to the ring and/or in addition to the staples of the outer device, the outer device may comprise one or more clips arranged around the outer circumference or outer periphery of the inner device and having a U-shape with a base portion and two legs extending from the base portion, one of the legs extending in a radial distance to and outwardly of the inner device, the other one of the legs engaging the inner device, for example by engaging the circumferential support member at an inner peripheral/circumferential side thereof, and the base portion may be arranged at a free front end of the native valve leaflets, whereby the clip(s) (axially) extend around the free front end of the native valve leaflets, and the legs clamp the circumferential connection channel wall structure, formed by the leaflets in this area, and the circumferential support structure together, whereby the circumferential connection channel wall structure (here, the native valve leaflets) is positioned between the one clip leg and the circumferential support member of the inner device.
The above-mentioned clips or staples can be inserted through the leaflets to the inner device (clipping from the ‘outside’), or through the inner device to the leaflets (clipping from the ‘inside’). In the latter case, the base member of the respective staple is arranged on an inner peripheral side of the inner device, for example of the circumferential support member, and the penetration legs of the staple penetrate the circumferential connection channel wall structure from an inner side to an outer side, with the free end of the penetration legs extending in a radial distance outwards of the inner device therealong or therearound, whereby the circumferential connection channel wall structure is clamped between the free ends of the penetration legs and the inner device.
In case of using the above-mentioned clips and/or staples arranged in angular intervals around the circumference of the inner device, the clamping mechanism can correspondingly clamp in a non-continuous (interrupted) circumferential manner.
As an alternative to the outer device, or in addition to the outer device, the inner device may comprise anchors or hooks fixed to the inner device and extending therefrom to be positioned inside the heart muscle (papillary muscle or ventricular wall) to enable the inner device to further resist the back pressure. In this respect, for example, the outer device may comprise elongate anchor elements which extend from the inner device by a (axial) distance so as to be able to penetrate with free ends thereof into native papillary muscle(s) when the inner device is in a finally implanted position within the connection channel.
Further, the inner device itself may contain components to facilitate its inherent anchoring such as hooks, barbs, an adhesive surface (e.g., biological glue), arms or cuffs to wrap around the native leaflets or the chordae tendinae or combinations thereof. According to an aspect of the invention, for example in addition to the ring and/or in addition to the staples and/or in addition to the clips, the outer device may comprise one or more arms extending at the outer periphery of the inner device in a radial distance thereto, to thereby be able to clamp the circumferential connection channel wall structure radially between the arm(s) and the inner device, the arms, starting from a free end thereof, (axially) extend in parallel to the inner device (for example, the circumferential support structure thereof) to thereby form a corresponding radial gap therebetween for receiving the circumferential connection channel wall structure therein for being clamped, and extend towards the inner device (for example, the circumferential support structure thereof) to be connected thereto, for example at an axial end of the inner device (e.g., of the circumferential support structure thereof). Thereby, the arms distributed around the outer periphery of the inner device form a collar therearound for radially wrapping the free ends of the native valve leaflets and for radially clamping the (free ends of the) native valve leaflets in the radial gap between the radial inner side of the collar and the inner device (for example the circumferential support member).
The valve prosthesis 1 of
The circumferential support structure 21 is radially compressible to thereby be insertable into the mitral valve 9 by means of a catheter 23 via a percutaneous approach. When in place in the interior of the connection channel 18, the circumferential support structure 21 is brought from its collapsed condition into a deployed condition circumferentially abutting, for example pressing, against the inner periphery of the circumferential connection channel wall structure 18′ of the connection channel 18 of the native atrial valve 9, here against the inner periphery of both the native valve leaflets 11 and the native valve annulus 13.
The valve prosthesis 1 further comprises an outer device 25 in form of or comprising a wire ring 26 or snare ring 26 disposed on and extending completely around an exterior or outer side of the connection channel 18 and of the circumferential connection channel wall structure 18′ thereof, here, around the native valve leaflets 11 at a position close to the valve annulus 13 and between longitudinal ends of the circumferential support structure 21 of the inner device 19. In this embodiment, the outer device 25 is separate from the inner device 19 and is not in physical contact therewith. The ring-shaped outer device 25 thereby circumferentially extends around the inner device 19 in a radial distance thereto, wherein the circumferential connection channel wall structure 18′, here the circumferential connection channel wall formed by the native valve annulus 13 and the native valve leaflets 11, is clamped between the inner and outer devices 19, 25 which thereby form a clamping mechanism for continuously circumferentially clamping the connection channel wall structure 18′ therebetween.
The wire ring 26 of the outer device 25 may be elastically or non-elastically contractible so as to be able to add additional active clamping force from radially outside of the valve structure 11, 13, 15, 17 thereagainst. The wire material of the wire of the outer device 25 may be linearly forwarded to the exterior of the circumferential connection channel wall structure 18′ via a catheter 27 forwarded via a percutaneous approach.
As can be further seen in
In
As can be seen from
In order to catch the free end 25″ of the wire 25′ and to thereby form the loop 31, a catching wire or additional lasso wire, having a contractible catching snare 28 at its distal end, is forwarded through the catheter 27. By means of said snare 28 of the catching wire the free end 25″ of the wire 25′ is caught and drawn into the catheter 27 to thereby form the loop 31 formed by the wire 25′, which loop then can be further contracted to closely circumferentially engage the connection channel wall structure 18′. Instead of the shown snare 28, a catching basket (not shown) may be used for catching the free end 25″ of the wire 25′, which is provided on the snare or lasso wire. Such a catching basket may, for example, be formed as a tubular member provided with longitudinal slots, wherein the tubular member can be axially contracted to laterally widen the longitudinal slots, in order to receive the free end 25″ within one or more of the longitudinal slots, and can be axially re-extended (after axial contraction) to thereby laterally narrow/close the previously widened slots to thereby catch/fix the free end 25″ of the wire 25′ therein. It is to be noted that other catching mechanisms/catching devices may be used, instead of the catching snare or catching basket, to catch or grip the free end of the wire 25″, such as any gripping device, such as a gripper device or forceps.
As can be seen from
In sum, with respect to
As can be further seen in
In all aspects of the invention, the (new/replacing) valve attached to the circumferential support structure of the stent-type inner device may comprise a circumferential wall portion which is circumferentially and radially clamped as part of the inner device against the inner periphery of the circumferential connection channel wall structure of the native atrial-ventricular valve to thereby provide for further improved seal function between the circumferential connection channel wall structure and the inner device. The outer device may be arranged aligned to or at a level of said circumferential wall portion of the (new/replacing) valve to thereby provide the clamping force at the level of or at least close to said circumferential wall portion of the valve.
As can be seen from
As can be seen from
As can be seen from
The wire 25″ and/or the catching wire 106 may be guided around the circumferential connection channel wall structure 18′ by means of first and second auxiliary delivery catheters 110, 112, respectively, which auxiliary delivery catheters 110, 112 may have been previously forwarded through the first and second delivery catheters 100, 102 and may be of a shape-memory material provided to return the first and second auxiliary delivery catheters 110, 112 to assume a bow shape to be correspondingly able to automatically surround the circumferential connection channel wall structure 18′ when being exposed from the first and second delivery catheters 100, 112. Accordingly, as can be seen from
As can be seen from
Various figures herein illustrate that the ring 26 of the outer device 25 remains positioned around the inner device 19 upon completion of the implantation of the atrio-ventricular (here mitral) valve prosthesis 1. However, the ring 26 of the outer device 25 can in embodiments be removed upon completion of the implantation. In such a case, the ring 26 of the outer device 25 may be used only during the implantation procedure to position the native valve leaflets 11 in a selected area to activate an anchoring mechanism, for example, as described herein, and may be subsequently removed. As illustrated in
Although the invention has been described on the basis of embodiments, the invention is not intended to be restricted to these embodiments, but is intended to cover all modifications, equivalents and variations within the spirit and scope of the invention as disclosed herein. In this regard, for example, the described methods may be carried out on the beating heart or on the arrested heart.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102010036824.5 | Aug 2010 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/884,953, filed Jan. 31, 2018, which in turn is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/153,333, filed May 12, 2016, which in turn is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/808,838, filed Jan. 7, 2013, which is a National Stage of PCT/IB2011/002282, filed Jun. 30, 2011. The present application claims priority and benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 61/363,070 and of German patent application No. 10 2010 036 824.5. The entire content of the prior applications is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3409013 | Berry | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3548417 | Kischer | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3587115 | Shiley | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3657744 | Ersek | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3671979 | Moulopoulos | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3714671 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3755823 | Hancock | Sep 1973 | A |
| 4035849 | Angell et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4056854 | Boretos et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4106129 | Carpentier et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4222126 | Boretos et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4265694 | Boretos et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4297749 | Davis et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4339831 | Johnson | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4343048 | Ross et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4345340 | Rosen | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4373216 | Klawitter | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4406022 | Roy | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4470157 | Love | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4535483 | Klawitter et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4574803 | Storz | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4592340 | Boyles | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4605407 | Black et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4612011 | Kautzky | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4643732 | Pietsch et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4692164 | Dzemeshkevich et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4759758 | Gabbay | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4762128 | Rosenbluth | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4777951 | Cribier et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4787899 | Lazarus | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4787901 | Baykut | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4796629 | Grayzel | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4829990 | Thuroff et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4851001 | Taheri | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4856516 | Hillstead | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4878495 | Grayzel | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4883458 | Shiber | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4922905 | Strecker | May 1990 | A |
| 4966604 | Reiss | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4979939 | Shiber | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4986830 | Owens et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5007896 | Shiber | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5026366 | Leckrone | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5032128 | Alonso | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5037434 | Lane | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5047041 | Samuels | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5059177 | Towne et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5080668 | Bolz et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085635 | Cragg | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5089015 | Ross | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5152771 | Sabbaghian et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5163953 | Vince | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5167628 | Boyles | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5192297 | Hull | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5266073 | Wall | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5282847 | Trescony et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5295958 | Shturman | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5332402 | Teitelbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5360444 | Kusuhara | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5370685 | Stevens | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5383905 | Golds et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5397351 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5411055 | Kane | May 1995 | A |
| 5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5443446 | Shturman | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5480424 | Cox | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5500014 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5545209 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5545214 | Stevens | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549665 | Vesely et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5554185 | Block et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5571175 | Vanney et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5591185 | Kilmer et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5607464 | Trescony et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5609626 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5639274 | Fischell et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5665115 | Cragg | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5716417 | Girard et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5728068 | Leone et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5749890 | Shaknovich | May 1998 | A |
| 5756476 | Epstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5769812 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5800508 | Goicoechea et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5855597 | Jayaraman | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5855601 | Bessler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5855602 | Angell | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5925063 | Khosravi | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6027525 | Suh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6132473 | Williams et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171335 | Wheatley et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174327 | Mertens et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6210408 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217585 | Houser et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221091 | Khosravi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6231602 | Carpentier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6245102 | Jayaraman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6299637 | Shaolian et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6302906 | Goicoechea et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6338735 | Stevens | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6350277 | Kocur | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6419696 | Ortiz | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425916 | Garrison et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6440164 | DiMatteo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6454799 | Schreck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6461382 | Cao | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468660 | Ogle et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6482228 | Norred | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6488704 | Connelly et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6537314 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6540782 | Snyders | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6569196 | Vesely | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6582462 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6605112 | Moll et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6629534 | St. Goar et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6733525 | Yang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6752813 | Goldfarb et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6830584 | Seguin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6875231 | Anduiza et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6893460 | Spenser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6908481 | Cribier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6951571 | Srivastava | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6978176 | Lattouf | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7018406 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7025780 | Gabbay | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7033390 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7041132 | Quijano et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7101396 | Artof et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7198646 | Figulla et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7201772 | Schwammenthal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7276078 | Spenser et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7276084 | Yang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7320704 | Lashinski et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7329279 | Haug et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7364588 | Mathis et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7374571 | Pease et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7381219 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7393360 | Spenser et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7399315 | Iobbi | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7429269 | Schwammenthal et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7442204 | Schwammenthal et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7445630 | Lashinski et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7462191 | Spenser et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7534259 | Lashinski et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7588582 | Starksen et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7618446 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7621948 | Herrmann et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7641686 | Lashinski et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7641688 | Lesh | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7666193 | Starksen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7717955 | Lane et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7722666 | Lafontaine | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7744912 | Hubbell et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7753949 | Lamphere et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7803185 | Gabbay | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 8070802 | Lamphere et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8092520 | Quadri | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8236049 | Rowe et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 20010021872 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020032481 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138135 | Duerig et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143393 | Cox | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151970 | Garrison et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020173842 | Buchanan | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004079 | Aigner et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014104 | Cribier | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036791 | Philipp et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040792 | Gabbay | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050694 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069635 | Cartledge et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100939 | Yodfat et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114913 | Spenser et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149476 | Damm et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163194 | Quijano et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030198722 | Johnston et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212454 | Scott et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220245 | Hubbell et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233142 | Morales et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040039436 | Spenser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049266 | Anduiza et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092858 | Wilson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122448 | Levine | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127981 | Rahdert et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127982 | Machold et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138745 | Macoviak et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186563 | Lobbi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186565 | Schreck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225355 | Stevens | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236418 | Stevens | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243230 | Navia et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260389 | Case et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260393 | Rahdert et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050033398 | Seguin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055089 | Macoviak et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137688 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137691 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197696 | Gomez Duran | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234546 | Nugent et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060025854 | Lashinski et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025857 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089671 | Goldfarb et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149350 | Patel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195134 | Crittenden | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229719 | Marquez et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259135 | Navia | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259137 | Artof et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271166 | Thill et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070005129 | Damm et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005131 | Taylor | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005133 | Lashinski et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016286 | Herrmann et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016288 | Gurskis et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100439 | Cangialosi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112422 | Dehdashtian | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142906 | Figulla et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162107 | Haug et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168024 | Khairkhahan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213813 | Von Segesser et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255396 | Douk et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070270944 | Bergheim et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004697 | Lichtenstein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033543 | Gurskis et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039934 | Styrc | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065011 | Marchand et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071361 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071362 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071363 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071366 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071368 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071369 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077234 | Styrc | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091264 | Machold et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147183 | Styrc | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154355 | Benichou et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208328 | Antocci et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208332 | Lamphere et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221672 | Lamphere et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243245 | Thambar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255660 | Guyenot et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255661 | Straubinger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080269878 | Iobbi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090012356 | Dann et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090012602 | Quadri | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054968 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054974 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062908 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149872 | Gross et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171432 | Von Segesser et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171447 | Von Segesser et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171456 | Kveen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216314 | Quadri | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222076 | Figulla et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259307 | Gross et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090270858 | Hauck et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276040 | Rowe | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090281609 | Benichou et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287298 | Jenson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287299 | Tabor et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319037 | Rowe | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100001001 | Seline | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100004740 | Seguin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100016958 | St. Goar et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036479 | Hill et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036484 | Hariton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036485 | Seguin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042208 | Herrmann et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049303 | Guyenot et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049315 | Kirson | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100069852 | Kelley | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070027 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100076548 | Konno | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082089 | Quadri et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082094 | Quadri et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082098 | Starksen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100100176 | Elizondo et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121435 | Subramanian et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121437 | Subramanian et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137397 | Birch et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141047 | Gibbs et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141847 | Jayaram et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100145438 | Barone | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100161042 | Maisano et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174363 | Castro | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198347 | Zakay et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210899 | Schankereli | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217382 | Chau et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249917 | Zhang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249918 | Zhang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100256751 | Rowe et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262232 | Annest | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280495 | Paul et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280604 | Zipory et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100292785 | Seguin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100298931 | Quadri et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312333 | Navia et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100331971 | Keranen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004296 | Lutter et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029072 | Gabbay | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060407 | Ketai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110071625 | Hill et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110106244 | Ferrari et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110111047 | Young | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110112632 | Chau et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125258 | Centola | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137397 | Chau et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178597 | Navia et al. | Jul 2011 | A9 |
| 20110184510 | Maisano et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208297 | Tuval et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208298 | Tuval et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213460 | Lashinski et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224785 | Hacohen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251684 | Rahdert et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264196 | Savage et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295059 | Machold et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313515 | Quadri et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110319988 | Schankereli et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120010700 | Spenser | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120016464 | Seguin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120022639 | Hacohen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120022640 | Gross et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101572 | Kovalsky et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179244 | Schankereli et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120191182 | Hauser et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197388 | Khairkhahan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203336 | Annest | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209376 | Hauser et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209377 | Machold et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226349 | Tuval et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120303116 | Gorman, III et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120323316 | Chau et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130096673 | Hill et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2006203499 | Aug 2006 | AU |
| 2414022 | Jan 2002 | CA |
| 1714766 | Jan 2006 | CN |
| 195 32 846 | Mar 1997 | DE |
| 199 07 646 | Aug 2000 | DE |
| 195 46 692 | Nov 2002 | DE |
| 100 49 812 | Jun 2004 | DE |
| 198 57 887 | May 2005 | DE |
| 601 11 184 | Oct 2005 | DE |
| 10 2006 052 564 | Dec 2007 | DE |
| 10 2007 049 404 | May 2008 | DE |
| 692 33 715 | Oct 2008 | DE |
| 20 2008 009 610 | Dec 2008 | DE |
| 10 2007 043 830 | Apr 2009 | DE |
| 0 103 546 | May 1988 | EP |
| 0 144 167 | Nov 1989 | EP |
| 0 592 410 | Apr 1994 | EP |
| 0 597 967 | May 1994 | EP |
| 0 850 607 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 1 057 460 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 1 469 797 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 1 088 529 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| 1 702 247 | Sep 2006 | EP |
| 1 629 795 | Jan 2008 | EP |
| 1 570 809 | Jan 2009 | EP |
| 205 5 266 | May 2009 | EP |
| 2 260 798 | Dec 2010 | EP |
| 9117720 | Nov 1991 | WO |
| 9217118 | Oct 1992 | WO |
| 9301768 | Feb 1993 | WO |
| 9724080 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| 9829057 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| 9933414 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 9940964 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| 9947075 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 0018333 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| 0041652 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| 0047139 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| 0135878 | May 2001 | WO |
| 0149213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 0154624 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 0156512 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 0162189 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 0164137 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 0176510 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| 02003892 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 0205731 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 0222054 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| 0236048 | May 2002 | WO |
| 0241789 | May 2002 | WO |
| 0243620 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 0247575 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 0249540 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 03003943 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| 03047468 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 03080150 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 2004014282 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| 2004026117 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2004032724 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2004112651 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| 2004112657 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| 2005062980 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| 2005070343 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2005072655 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2005079706 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2005087140 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2006014233 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006034008 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2006054930 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006113906 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2006121450 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2006127756 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2006127765 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2006128185 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2006128193 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2007009117 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007016187 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| 2007025028 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007053243 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2007075394 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| 2008005405 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008013915 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008035337 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| 2008070224 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2008089365 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008091515 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008092101 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008095475 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2008103497 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2008103498 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2008103722 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2008106531 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| 2008125153 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| 2008147964 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2008150529 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009014617 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| 2009024859 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009026563 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009033469 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| 2009052188 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009053497 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009085206 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2009085207 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2009092782 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2009108355 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| 2009132187 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2009134701 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2009140268 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2009149215 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2009155561 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2010007609 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2010033936 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010037141 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010042950 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010057262 | May 2010 | WO |
| 2010080594 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2010086460 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2010090878 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2010091653 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2010093837 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2010099032 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2010117471 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010117589 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010117609 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010117680 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010121076 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010127041 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 2010141047 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2010141847 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2011051043 | May 2011 | WO |
| 2011072084 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2011106137 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011106533 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011106544 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011109813 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011111047 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011137531 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2012063228 | May 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Oct. 16, 2020 Office Action issued U.S. Appl. No. 15/884,953. |
| Walher et al. Transapical Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Implantation; Multicenter Experience. Circulation 116,11 suppl. (2007). |
| Jun. 1, 2017 Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/153,333. |
| D.N. Ross, “Aortic Valve Surgery,” The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, Sep. 1966, pp. 192-197. |
| Poncin et al., Nitinol Tubular Stents: Comparing Two Manufacturing Methods, Proceedings of the First European Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies, 1999, pp. 165-170. |
| Antona, et al., “Hybrid Technique for Total Arch Repair: Aortic Neck Reshaping for Endovascular-Graft Fixation,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007, vol. 83, pp. 1158-1161. |
| Boudjemline et al, “Steps Toward Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement”, Journal of the American Heart Association, Feb. 12, 2002. |
| “Direct Flow Medical Announces Fifth Patent Issuance of Their Unique Percutaneous Aortic Valve Technology”, Santa Rosa, California, May 19, 2009. |
| Andersen, et al, “Transluminal implantation of articifial heart valves, Description of a new expandable aortic valve and initial results with implantation by catheter technique in closed chest pigs”, Eur Heart J., May 1992, vol. 103, No. 5, pp. 704-708 (Abstract). (retrieved from http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=1618213%5Buid%5D). |
| Inoue et al., “Clinical application of transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon catheter,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg., Mar. 1984, vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 394-402. (Abstract). (retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=6700245%5Buid%5D). |
| Lawrence, Jr. et al., “Percutaneous endvascular graft: experimental evaluation,” Radiology, May 1987, vol. 163, No. 2, pp. 357-3690. (Abstract). (retrieved from http://www.Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=2951767%5Buid%5D). |
| Pavcnik et al., “Development and initial experimental evaluation of a prosthetic aortic valve for transcatheter placement. Work in progress,” Radiology, Apr. 1992, vol. 183, No. 1, pp. 151-154. (Abstract) (retrieved from http://www.Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=1549662). |
| Sabbah et al., “Mechanical factors in the degeneration of porcine bioprosthetic valves: an overview”, J Card Surg, Dec. 1989, vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 302-309 (Abstract). (retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=252009%5Buid%5D). |
| Selby et al., “Experience with new retrieval forceps for foreign body removal in the vascular, urinary, and billiary systems”, Radiology, Aug. 1990, vol. 176, No. 2, pp. 535-538. (Abstract). (retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=2367671%5Buid%5D). |
| Al Zaibag et al., “Percutaneous balloon valvotomy in tricuspid stenosis,” Br Heart J, Case Reports, 1987, vol. 57, pp. 51-53. (retrieved froom http://www.heartbmj.com). |
| Al-Khaja et al., “Eleven years' experience with Carpentier-Edwards biological valves in relation to survival and complications,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1989, vol. 3, pp. 305-311. |
| Almagor et al., “Balloon Expandable Stent Implantation in Stenotic Right Heart Valved Conduits,” JACC, Nov. 1, 1990, vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 1310-1314. |
| Benchimol et al., “Simultaneous left ventricular echocardiography and aortic blood velocity during rapid right ventricular pacing in man,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Jan.-Feb. 1977, vol. 273, No. 1, pp. 55-62. |
| Dotter et al., “Transluminal Treatment of Arteriosclerotic Obstruction”, Curculation, vol. XXX, Nov. 1964, pp. 654-670. |
| Kolata, “Device That Opens Clogged Arteries Gets a Failing Grade in a New Study,” Jan. 3, 1991 (retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/articles.html). |
| Rashkind et al., “Creation of an Atrial Septal Defect Without Thoracotomy,” JAMA, Jun. 13, 1966, vol. 196, No. 11, pp. 173-174. |
| Rashkind et al., “Historical Aspects of Interventional Cardiology: Past, Present and Future,” Texas Heart Institute Journal, vol. 13, No. 4, Dec. 1986, pp. 363-367. |
| Rosch et al., “The Birth, Early Years, and Future of Interventional Radiology,” Radiol, 2003, vol. 14, pp. 841-853. |
| Uchida et al., “Modifications of Gianturco Expandable Wire Stents,” AJR, May 1988, vol. 150, pp. 1185-1187. |
| Watt et al., “Intravenous adenosine in the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia: a dose-ranging study and interactions with dipyridamole,” Br. J. cln. Pharmac, 1986, vol. 21, pp. 227-230. |
| Jan. 7, 2020 Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/884,953. |
| Jun. 26, 2020 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/884,953. |
| Apr. 9, 2021 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/884,953. |
| Oct. 21, 2021 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/684,751. |
| Jul. 20, 2021 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/685,018. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200078171 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61363070 | Jul 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13808838 | US | |
| Child | 15153333 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15884953 | Jan 2018 | US |
| Child | 16685062 | US | |
| Parent | 15153333 | May 2016 | US |
| Child | 15884953 | US |
