The present invention generally relates to a transceiver arrangement. The present invention also relates to a communication device capable of frequency division duplex communication comprising such a transceiver arrangement. The present invention also relates to a method of operating such a transceiver arrangement, and a computer program for implementing the method.
Transceivers comprise both a transmitter and a receiver, and are commonly used in a variety of communication apparatuses. Transceivers can be arranged to be operated in semi-duplex, i.e. the receiver and transmitter operate separated in time to prevent the transmitter signal from concealing the received signal. This approach is therefore commonly referred to as time division duplex (TDD). Transceivers can also be operated in full duplex, i.e. the receiver and transmitter operate simultaneously wherein some special arrangements are provided to prevent the transmitter from concealing the received signal. One approach to achieve this is to assign different frequencies for transmission and reception. This approach is therefore commonly referred to as frequency division duplex (FDD).
Often the receiver and the transmitter use the same antenna, or antenna system which may comprise several antennas, which implies that some kind of circuitry may be desired to enable proper interaction with the antenna. This circuitry should be made with certain care when operating the transceiver in full duplex since the transmitter signal, although using FDD, may interfere with the received signal, i.e. internal interference within the transceiver.
An object of the invention is to at least alleviate the above stated drawback. The present invention is based on the understanding that counteracting contribution from a transmitter at a receiver input in a transceiver reduces or cancels signal. The inventors have found that contribution by the transmitter signal at the receiver input via one branch can be counteracted by the contribution by the transmitter signal at the receiver input via another branch including an element including an adaptable resistance, wherein the aggregate contribution by the transmitter signal at the receiver input is ideally zero. By combining a filtering structure with a cancelling structure, less transmitter energy will reach the receiver.
According to a first aspect, there is provided a transceiver arrangement comprising a receiver arranged for frequency-division duplex communication with a communication network; a transmitter arranged for frequency-division duplex communication with the communication network; a transmission port for connecting to an antenna or wire; a first filter connected between an output of the transmitter and the transmission port and arranged to pass signals at transmitter frequency and attenuate signals at receiver frequency; a transformer having a primary winding and a secondary winding, wherein the primary winding has one of its terminals connected to the transmission port; a second filter connected between another of the terminals of the primary winding and a reference voltage and arranged to attenuate signals at transmitter frequency and pass signals at receiver frequency; and an adaptive impedance circuit arranged to provide an adjustable resistance, connected between the output of the transmitter and the junction between the second filter and the another of the terminals of the primary winding, and arranged to provide a contribution from the transmitter to the primary winding such that a common-mode rejection of a contribution from the transmitter provided at the transmission port occurs at receive frequency.
The transceiver arrangement may further comprise a third filter connected between the output of the transmitter and a reference voltage and arranged to attenuate signals at transmitter frequency and pass signals at an interferer frequency.
The transceiver arrangement may further comprise a fourth filter connected at the input of the receiver arranged to attenuate signals at receive frequency and pass signals at an interferer frequency. The fourth filter may be connected across differential input terminals of the receiver, or the fourth filter may be connected between a single-ended input terminal of the receiver and a reference voltage.
The first filter may comprise a capacitance and a first inductance coupled in parallel where the parallel coupling is coupled in series with a second inductance, and the second filter comprises a first capacitance and an inductance coupled in parallel, where the parallel coupling is coupled in series with a second capacitance. At least one of the capacitance and the first and second inductances of the first filter may be controllable and is controlled by a controller, and at least one of the inductance and the first and second capacitances of the second filter is controllable and is controlled by the controller. The first filter may comprise a further capacitance coupled in series with the second inductance, and the further capacitance may be controllable and controlled by the controller.
The first filter may comprise a first capacitance and an inductance coupled in parallel, where the parallel coupling is coupled in series with a second capacitance, and the second filter comprises a capacitance and a first inductance coupled in parallel where the parallel coupling is coupled in series with a second inductance. At least one of the inductance and the first and second capacitances of the first filter may be controllable and controlled by a controller, and at least one of the capacitance and the first and second inductances of the second filter may be controllable and controlled by the controller. The second filter may comprise a further capacitance coupled in series with the second inductance, and the further capacitance may be controllable and controlled by the controller.
The transceiver arrangement may further comprise a signal detector arrangement at terminal or terminals of an input port of the receiver or at the terminals of the primary winding, and a controller arranged to control at least one of the first filter, the second filter and the adaptive impedance circuit based on the detected signal or signals such that the transmitter contribution at the receiver input at receive frequency is minimised.
According to a second aspect, there is provided a communication device, capable of frequency division duplex communication via a communication network, comprising a transceiver arrangement according to the first aspect.
According to a third aspect, there is provided a method of controlling a transceiver arrangement comprising a receiver and a transmitter arranged for frequency-division duplex communication with a communication network, a transmission port for connecting to an antenna or wire, a first filter connected between an output of the transmitter and the transmission port and arranged to pass signals at transmitter frequency and attenuate signals at receiver frequency, a transformer having a primary winding and a secondary winding, wherein the primary winding has one of its terminals connected to the transmission port, a second filter connected between another of the terminals of the primary winding and a reference voltage and arranged to attenuate signals at transmitter frequency and pass signals at receiver frequency, and an adaptive impedance circuit arranged to provide an adjustable resistance, connected between the output of the transmitter and the junction between the second filter and the another of the terminals of the primary winding, and arranged to provide a contribution from the transmitter to the primary winding such that a common-mode rejection of a contribution from the transmitter provided at the transmission port occurs at receive frequency. The method comprises setting filter parameters such that the first filter passes signals at transmitter frequency and attenuates signals at receiver frequency and the second filter attenuates signals at transmitter frequency and passes signals at receive frequency; adjusting the adjustable resistance of the adaptive impedance circuit such that magnitude of transmitter contribution in the primary winding is reduced; and phase tuning at least one impedance element of at least one of the first filter, the second filter and the adaptive impedance circuit such that the amplitude is minimised.
The method may further comprise measuring signals at the receiver input or at the primary winding of the transformer, wherein the adjusting of the adjustable resistance and/or the phase tuning is based on the measured signals.
According to a fourth aspect, there is provided a computer program comprising computer executable instructions which when executed by a programmable controller of a transceiver arrangement causes the controller to perform the method according to the third aspect.
Other objectives, features and advantages of the present invention will appear from the following detailed disclosure, from the attached dependent claims as well as from the drawings. Generally, all terms used in the claims are to be interpreted according to their ordinary meaning in the technical field, unless explicitly defined otherwise herein. All references to “a/an/the [element, device, component, means, step, etc)” are to be interpreted openly as referring to at least one instance of said element, device, component, means, step, etc., unless explicitly stated otherwise. The steps of any method disclosed herein do not have to be performed in the exact order disclosed, unless explicitly stated.
The above, as well as additional objects, features and advantages of the present invention, will be better understood through the following illustrative and non-limiting detailed description of preferred embodiments of the present invention, with reference to the appended drawings.
The transmitting frequency and the receiving frequencies are distinguished since the transceiver arrangement 300 is arranged to work with FDD communication. The first filter 310 is of a type which is arranged to pass signals at the transmitting frequency and attenuate signals at the receive frequency. Thus, a signal at transmitting frequency from the transmitter 304 will be transmitted efficiently through e.g. an antenna connected to the antenna port 306.
The second filter 312 is of a type which are arranged to pass signals at the receiving frequency and attenuate signals at the transmitting frequency. Thus, a signal at transmitting frequency from the transmitter 304 will not be lost to ground and is enabled to be transmitted efficiently through e.g. an antenna connected to the antenna port 306.
A received signal from an antenna connected to the antenna port 306 reaches the receiver 302 via a transformer 314 which has a primary winding 316 which is connected via the second filter to a reference voltage, e.g. ground. A secondary winding 318 of the transformer 314 is connected to the input of the receiver 302. Thus, the transceiver arrangement 300 provides a structure which efficiently provides signals from the transmitter to the antenna port, efficiently provides signals from the antenna port to the receiver, and at the same time reduces interfering signals from the transmitter to reach the receiver.
The second filter 312 has high impedance at transmit frequency and the adaptive impedance circuit 308 bleeds some transmitter output current to this high impedance such that the resulting signal gets the same amplitude as the transmitter signal at the other terminal of the primary winding 316, i.e. at the antenna port node. Thus, the adaptive impedance circuit 308 is tuned for magnitude cancellation of the transmitter signal at the receiver. The first filter limits the amount of transmitter noise at receive frequency to get through to the receiver by providing a high impedance at the receive frequency. The high impedance at the receive frequency also reduces receiver insertion loss.
Symmetry of the transmitter signal reaching one terminal of the primary winding 316 and the transmitter signal reaching the other terminal of the primary winding 316 via the adaptive impedance circuit 308 is desired to keep the aggregate contribution by the transmitter signal at the receiver input close to zero, i.e. cancellation will then occur in the primary winding 314. This is accomplished adapting the resistance of the adaptive impedance circuit 308. This can be made by having a controller 340 controlling an adjustable resistance of the adaptive impedance circuit 308. Here, although the controller 340 is depicted as a separate element, it can be integrated with the adaptive impedance circuit 308.
The controller 340 can comprise circuitry measuring transmitter contribution signal at the input of the receiver 302, as indicated by hashed lines, or at the terminals of the primary winding 316, and provide control to the . . . adaptive impedance circuit 308 using a control scheme where the transmitter signal contribution at the receiver input is minimised at all times.
The controller 340 can also be arranged to control the filters 310, 312, such that suitable filter characteristics for passing and attenuating signals as described above are achieved for different frequency constellations of frequencies for transmitting and receiving. For example, if the transceiver operates in FDD where transmit frequency is a certain amount higher than the receive frequency, and the transceiver switches to an operation mode where transceiver operates in FDD where receive frequency is the certain amount higher than the transmit frequency, the controller 340 can swap the properties of the first and second filters. Similar change of respective properties of the first and second filters can be made by the controller 340 upon change of the certain amount of frequency difference between receive and transmit frequencies, etc.
Impedance levels of the adaptive impedance circuit 308, the first filter and the second filter are designed and scaled to enable that noise at receive frequency, i.e. contributed by the transmitter, appear as common-mode around the primary winding 316. Such noise is thereby rejected.
A controller 440 can comprise circuitry measuring transmitter contribution signal at the input of the receiver 402, and provide control to the adaptive impedance circuit 408 using a control scheme where the transmitter signal contribution at the receiver input is minimised at all times. The controller 440 can also be arranged to control the filters 410, 412, 414, 416 such that suitable filter characteristics for passing and attenuating signals as described above are achieved for different frequency constellations of frequencies for transmitting and receiving.
The particular features of the structure of
Another option demonstrated with reference to
The selectable operation of the optional filters 420, 422, 424, 426 can be controlled by the controller 440.
The receiver 302 depicted in
The filters in the different embodiments demonstrated above can be made more or less complex, and with different constraints on performance. Simple filters comprising single capacitors or inductors may be used, but may not fulfil the demands of constraints set up. High-order filters may on the other hand introduce other problems, and/or cost/space issues.
Depending on whether receiving frequency is higher or lower than the transmitting frequency, the first filter can be selected as one of the types illustrated in
The impedances of the filters are low at the pass frequency, which is set by the series resonance between their LC tank and the series capacitor or inductor 506, 606. At the rejected frequency the impedance is high, which is set by the parallel resonance of the respective parallel coupling 502, 504; 602, 604. Depending on the frequency relationship between pass and rejection frequency selection between the types of filters 500, 600 is made, i.e. if pass frequency is less than rejected frequency, a filter as depicted in
The capacitors can be coarse and/or fine tuned. Coarse tuning can be used for example to set an operating band of a transceiver arrangement, and fine tuning can be used for phase control for antenna impedance matching. The fine tuning is also applied to achieve proper isolation of the transmitter contribution from the receiver input. Depending on quality factor and value needed for the components in the filters, they can be implemented on chip, on high-Q substrate or as discrete components of a printed circuit board.
For the controlling of filter properties as demonstrated above, an efficient way is to let the controller 340, 440 control the capacitance values of capacitances 502, 602, 606, 702, 708 of the filters, e.g. by having the capacitances 502, 602, 606, 702, 708 as controllable capacitance banks. It is of course also possible to control inductors 506, 504, 604, 704, 706.
The antenna port described above need not necessarily by connected to an antenna, but can equally be connected to a wired line which conveys radio frequency signals. Thus, the communication device 1000 described with reference to
The invention has mainly been described above with reference to a few embodiments. However, as is readily appreciated by a person skilled in the art, other embodiments than the ones disclosed above are equally possible within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended patent claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/058997 | 4/30/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/177191 | 11/6/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
404375 | Bain | Jun 1869 | A |
3900823 | Sokal et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4325140 | Stitzer | Apr 1982 | A |
5404375 | Kroeger et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
6169912 | Zuckerman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6567648 | Ahn et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567649 | Souissi | May 2003 | B2 |
6745018 | Zehavi et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7109793 | Nakatani et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7756480 | Loh | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8654743 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8797927 | Chen | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8909161 | Din et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9143186 | Andersson et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9344139 | Sjoland et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
20030008693 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030128081 | Ella et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030193997 | Dent | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040180633 | Nakatani et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050035824 | Kearns | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046585 | Dodge | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050170790 | Chang et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060028298 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060133599 | Pagnanelli | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135084 | Lee | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060261902 | Masuda et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070015468 | Kouki et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070117524 | Do | May 2007 | A1 |
20070152904 | Castaneda et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070182509 | Park et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202826 | Dean | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070207747 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070217488 | Smaini et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080198773 | Loh | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080238789 | Wilcox | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080242235 | Adler et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279262 | Shanjani | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090028074 | Knox | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090253385 | Dent et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090289739 | Sasaki et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100035563 | Mikhemar et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100109800 | Ueda et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100148886 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159837 | Dent et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100253477 | Seppä et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279617 | Osman | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100304701 | Jung et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110064004 | Mikhemar et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064005 | Mikhemar et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110124309 | Trotta et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110158134 | Mikhemar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175789 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110187478 | Link et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110199142 | Mu | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110221521 | Razzell et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110299433 | Darabi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299437 | Mikhemar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120009886 | Poulin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120126907 | Nakamoto et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120195351 | Banwell et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130063223 | See et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077540 | Black et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130176912 | Khlat | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130194978 | Andersson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130258911 | Choksi | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130271004 | Min et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130315116 | Chen | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140169231 | Mikhemar et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169235 | Mikhemar | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140253236 | Cheeranthodi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140315501 | Rudell et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140364073 | Sjoland | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376419 | Goel et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150156005 | Sjoland et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150281974 | Ghasemzadeh et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150303981 | Sjoland et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160043767 | Andersson et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160065352 | Sjoland et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160294436 | Din et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102332931 | Jan 2012 | CN |
0388927 | Sep 1990 | EP |
1813030 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2226948 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2296286 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2388927 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2672631 | Dec 2013 | EP |
2264032 | Nov 2005 | RU |
2006068635 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2007149954 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2009080878 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2011146404 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2014173459 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Pursula, P. et al., “Hybrid Transformer-Based Adaptive RF Front End for UHF RFID Mobile Phone Readers”, 2008 IEEE International Conference on RFID, The Venetian, Las Vegas, US, Apr. 16, 2008, pp. 151-155, IEEE. |
Mikhemar, M., et al., “A Tunable Integrated Duplexer with 50dB Isolation in 40nm CMOS”, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference—Digest of Technical Papers, Feb. 8, 2009, 386-387,387a, San Francisco, CA, IEEE. |
Mikhemar, M., et al., “An On-Chip Wideband and Low-Loss Duplexer for 3G/4G CMOS Radios”, 2010 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits (VLSIC), Technical Digest of Technical Papers, Jun. 16, 2010, pp. 129-130, IEEE. |
Larson, L., et al., “4th Generation Wireless Transceiver Design”, Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (BCTM), Oct. 4, 2010, pp. 113-120, IEEE. |
Elzayat, A., et al., “Tx/Rx Isolation Enhancement Based on a Novel Balanced Duplexer Architecture”, 2011 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Jun. 5, 2011, pp. 1-4, IEEE. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160072542 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |