Modern mobile phone transceivers can support transmission and reception of data over a wide array of communication protocols, such as Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Bluetooth, FM radio, 3G, 4G, infrared, etc. In some instances, each of these communication protocols is carried out in the mobile phone transceiver by its own hardware subunit. For example, GSM communication can be carried out by a GSM hardware subunit, and FM radio reception can be carried out by another, separate FM Radio (FMR) hardware subunit.
Although these subunits may share some components, they often include distinct communication paths so they can transmit and/or receive data concurrently. On each path, a mixer often receives a local oscillator (LO) signal to convert the frequency of a signal-of-interest to another desired frequency. The inventors have appreciated that interference can arise when a harmonic of an LO signal over a second communication path (e.g., in an FMR subunit) downconverts a transmit signal of a first communication path (e.g., in a GSM subunit). This cross-talk interference can degrade the sensitivity of the second communication path. Similarly, LO harmonics generated by the first communication path can parasitically affect the second communication path.
Therefore, the inventors have devised improved transceivers that limit degradation between communication units within mobile phones and other communication devices.
The claimed subject matter is now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the claimed subject matter. It may be evident, however, that the claimed subject matter may be practiced without these specific details.
Some embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a transceiver that includes multiple communication subunits associated with multiple communication protocols, respectively. The transceiver includes a conflict detection and control unit that determines whether interference is present or anticipated to occur between two or more of the communication subunits. If interference is present or anticipated, a local oscillator (LO) tuning unit changes an LO frequency provided to at least one of the two or more communication units. For example, in some embodiments, the LO tuning unit changes the LO frequency from high-side injection to low-side injection, or vice versa, and/or changes an intermediate frequency (IF) associated with a given communication subunit. In these ways, the techniques disclosed herein limit signal degradation due to interference from communication subunits residing within the transceiver.
Referring now to
In any case, each subunit includes one or more communication paths on which signals are transmitted and/or received. For example, in FIG. 1's embodiment, the first subunit 102 includes a first communication path 112 having a first antenna 106, a first local oscillator 108, and a first mixer 110; which are operably coupled as shown. When the first communication subunit 102 acts as a transmitter, a digital block 114 provides a first signal 116 to a first input of the first mixer 110. The first mixer 110 then multiplies the first signal 116 with a first LO signal 118 to produce an up-converted RF signal 120, which can be transmitted over the first antenna 106.
The illustrated second subunit 104 includes a second communication path 130 having a second antenna 122, a second LO 124, a second mixer 126, and a filter unit 128; which are operably coupled as shown. When the second subunit acts as a receiver, the second antenna 122 provides an RF signal 132, which includes a wanted signal, to a first input of the second mixer 126. The second mixer 126 mixes the wanted signal with a second LO signal 134 from the second LO 124, and provides a down-converted wanted signal 136 (e.g., IF signal) therefrom. The down-converted wanted signal 136 is then passed through the filter block 128, which rejects unwanted frequency components, to provide a filtered signal 142 which can be demodulated and otherwise processed in digital circuitry 114.
Absent countermeasures, the first signal 116 or first LO signal 118 (and/or a harmonic frequency thereof) can lead to interference on the second communication path 130. To limit or avoid such interference, a conflict detection and control unit 138 monitors the frequencies of the first and second LO signals 118, 134 and harmonics thereof in relation to the frequencies being transmitted or received on the communication paths 112, 130.
If a conflict is detected, the conflict detection and control unit 138 notifies an LO tuning unit 140, which selectively adjusts the frequency of the second LO signal 134 to mitigate the interference. In particular, the LO tuning unit 140 can induce a discrete change in the frequency of the second LO signal 134 such that the second LO signal is changed between a low-side injection mode and a high-side injection mode without changing an intermediate frequency (IF) associated with the corresponding communication path. In other embodiments, the detection and control unit 138 can change the frequency of the second LO signal 134 in a manner that changes the IF to limit or avoid interference. When the IF is adjusted, the conflict detection and control unit 138 also typically adjusts the passband of filter block 128 to allow the newly “tuned” IF to pass therethrough.
By continuously or intermittently monitoring the LO frequencies used by the various communication subunits (and harmonics associated therewith), and comparing these frequencies with the frequencies used for transmission and reception of RF signals, the disclosed techniques provide more efficient communication than previous solutions in some respects.
Referring now to
The conflict detection and control unit 210 monitors the frequencies (and associated harmonics) of the LO signals and any transmitted or received signals. In the case of
It will be appreciated that the frequencies in
Each subunit can include one or more communication paths that include an analog front end (e.g. 304A, 304B) and digital circuitry (e.g., 306A, 306B), wherein an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) or digital-to-analog converter (DAC) is disposed therebetween, depending on whether the communication path is used for reception or transmission. Within the analog front ends, one or more local oscillators (LOs) (e.g., 308A, 308B), which can comprise a phase-locked loop (e.g., 310A, 310B) and a fractional divider (e.g., 312A, 312B) in some instances, provide LO signals to the communication paths. Within the digital circuitry, a digital processor (e.g., 314A, 314B), memory (316A, 316B), and JTAG interface (318A, 318B) are often found.
Although
At 404, the method determines a fundamental frequency and harmonic frequencies of a second signal-of-interest to be provided on a second communication path in the mobile communication device. Typically the fundamental frequency of the second signal-of-interest differs from the fundamental frequency of the first signal-of-interest. For example, consistent with the example previously discussed in
At 406, the method sets a fundamental frequency of a first LO signal. This first LO signal is to be provided on the first communication path to convert (e.g., up-convert) the fundamental frequency of the first signal. The method also determines first LO harmonics associated the first LO signal in 406.
At 408, the method sets a fundamental frequency of a second LO signal. This second LO signal is to be provided on the second communication path to convert (e.g., down-convert) the fundamental frequency of the second signal. The method also determines second LO harmonics associated the second LO signal in 408.
The method then proceeds to 410 and determines whether the fundamental or harmonic frequencies of the first signal or the fundamental or harmonic frequencies of the first LO signal cause interference in the second communication channel 420. If so (‘YES’ at 410), the method changes the fundamental frequency of the second LO signal to mitigate the conflict in 412.
If not (‘NO’ at 410), there is no detected conflict and the method proceeds to 414 where it uses the first and second LO signals to perform frequency conversion on the first and second signals of interest, respectively.
Furthermore, the ninth harmonic of the LO frequency is located at 830.475 MHz, which is separated from the frequency of the GSM by an intermediate frequency IF of 0.275 MHz, too.
As shown in
Consequently, to limit interference/cross-talk, the frequency of the LOHS signal is shifted to LOLs (see arrow 504), as shown in
It will be appreciated that the frequencies in
Although the disclosure has been shown and described with respect to one or more implementations, equivalent alterations and modifications will occur to others skilled in the art based upon a reading and understanding of this specification and the annexed drawings. The disclosure includes all such modifications and alterations and is limited only by the scope of the following claims. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described components (e.g., elements and/or resources), the terms used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component which performs the specified function of the described component (e.g., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary implementations of the disclosure. In addition, while a particular feature of the disclosure may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. In addition, the articles “a” and “an” as used in this application and the appended claims are to be construed to mean “one or more”.
Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “includes”, “having”, “has”, “with”, or variants thereof are used in either the detailed description or the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising.”