Transdermal administration of tamsulosin

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9610253
  • Patent Number
    9,610,253
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 3, 2014
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 4, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
In an aspect of the invention, a composition for making a patch for the transdermal delivery of tamsulosin is provided. The composition comprises (a) at least about 1 wt % tamsulosin or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of tamsulosin, (b) at least about 40 wt % polyisobutylene adhesive or hydrophobic synthetic rubber adhesive, (c) about 1-20 wt % of an aprotic solvent in which tamsulosin dissolves readily, (d) about 1-20 wt % of an unsaturated fatty acid or an alpha-hydroxy acid or a mixture of unsaturated fatty acids or alpha-hydroxy acids or of both unsaturated fatty acids and alpha-hydroxy acids, (e) a lipophilic permeation enhancer, and (f) a matrix modifier.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates generally to the transdermal administration of tamsulosin and other active agents which are poorly soluble in the adhesive matrix.


BACKGROUND

Tamsulosin is a drug approved in the United States for the treatment of signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. It is marketed in an oral formulation under the trade name Flomax®. The R(—) stereoisomer is used for treatment. The approved oral doses are 0.4 mg/day and 0.8 mg/day. The chemical structure of tamsulosin is 5-[2-[[2-(2-ethoxyphenoxy)ethyl]amino]propyl]-2-methoxy-benzenesulfonamide:




embedded image


Tamsulosin is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,447,958 to Niigata et al., assigned to Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Therapeutically, it is believed to be an α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist acting preferentially on α1A receptors. While it has therapeutic effects comparable to other α1 antagonists, its benzenesulfonamide structure makes it different chemically from other α1 antagonists in common clinical use (e.g., prazosin and terazosin).


In addition to treatment of signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, tamsulosin has been reported to be effective in the treatment of ureterolithiasis and has been studied as a treatment for painful ejaculation. The use of tamsulosin has also been considered or suggested for other urological conditions, for example evacuatory insufficiency in U.S. Pat. No. 6,861,070 and pathogenic vascular degradative modeling in the ilio-hypogastric-pudendal arterial bed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,787,553.


About twelve years before the present application, the transdermal administration of tamsulosin was taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,843,472. Certain enhancer combinations are claimed there. It is believed that a permeation enhancer is needed for adequate transdermal administration of tamsulosin.


Despite the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 5,843,472, there are no tamsulosin patches available in the United States. Transdermal delivery offers well-known advantages in avoiding sharp peak concentrations and side effects resulting from such concentrations. The pharmacokinetics of the oral Flomax® formulation suffers from a considerable food effect, as documented in the package insert. Tamsulosin, like other al antagonists, has produced postural hypotension in some patients, which transdermal delivery may alleviate by avoiding high peak concentrations.


There is therefore a need for an improved transdermal patch which can deliver tamsulosin.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In an aspect of the invention, a composition for making a patch for the transdermal delivery of tamsulosin is provided. The composition comprises (a) at least about 1 wt % tamsulosin or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of tamsulosin, (b) at least about 40 wt % polyisobutylene adhesive or hydrophobic synthetic rubber adhesive, (c) about 1-20 wt % of an aprotic solvent in which tamsulosin dissolves readily, (d) about 1-20 wt % of an unsaturated fatty acid or an alpha-hydroxy acid or a mixture of unsaturated fatty acids or alpha-hydroxy acids or of both unsaturated fatty acids and alpha-hydroxy acids, (e) a lipophilic permeation enhancer, and (f) a matrix modifier.


In a further aspect of the invention, a method of manufacturing a transdermal drug-in-adhesive patch for delivery of tamsulosin is provided. In the method, tamsulosin or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of tamsulosin is dissolved in an aprotic solvent. The tamsulosin solution is combined with a lipophilic permeation enhancer and an unsaturated fatty acid. A matrix modifier is added and the resulting solution is homogenized. The solution is then mixed with a polyisobutylene adhesive or hydrophobic synthetic rubber adhesive in a suitable solvent. It may be solvent cast or extruded.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 depicts the results of a skin permeation test for Examples 1 and 2.



FIG. 2 depicts the results of a skin permeation test for Examples 1 and 3.



FIG. 3 depicts the results of a skin permeation test for Example 7.



FIG. 4 depicts the results of a skin permeation test for Examples 8 and 9, with an Example 1 patch used as a reference.



FIG. 5 depicts the results of a skin permeation test for Example 10.



FIGS. 6A-6B depicts the results of a skin permeation test for Example 11.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

It is to be understood that, unless otherwise indicated, this invention is not limited to specific polymers, oligomers, crosslinking agents, additives, manufacturing processes, or adhesive products. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting.


In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below.


The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a hydrophilic polymer” includes not only a single hydrophilic polymer but also two or more hydrophilic polymers that may or may not be combined in a single composition, reference to “a plasticizer” includes a single plasticizer as well as two or more plasticizers that may or may not be combined in a single composition, and the like.


Where a range of values is provided, it is intended that each intervening value between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the disclosure. For example, if a range of 1 μm to 8 μm is stated, it is intended that 2 μm, 3 μm, 4 μm, 5 μm, 6 μm, and 7 μm are also disclosed, as well as the range of values greater than or equal to 1 μm and the range of values less than or equal to 8 μm.


When we refer to an adhesive matrix in this application, we include matrices which are made in one piece, for example via solvent casting or extrusion. We also include, however, matrices which are made in two or more portions which are then pressed or joined together.


A. Patches and Compositions for Making them


In an aspect of the invention, a composition for making a patch for the transdermal delivery of tamsulosin is provided. The composition comprises (a) tamsulosin or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of tamsulosin, (b) polyisobutylene adhesive, (c) an aprotic solvent in which tamsulosin dissolves readily, (d) an unsaturated fatty acid, (e) a lipophilic permeation enhancer, and (f) a matrix modifier.


Among the obstacles standing in the way of a good tamsulosin transdermal patch are (a) the poor solubility of tamsulosin in conventional transdermal reservoir materials such as polyisobutylene (PIB) adhesives and (b) the skin irritation which may result from the active itself or from the additives e.g. permeation enhancers. For many drug substances the free base form is readily soluble in transdermal adhesives, whereas oral formulations tend to use salt forms of the drug substance. For tamsulosin, however, both aqueous and organic solvent solubility are generally poor.


Transdermal administration of tamsulosin with conventional transdermal adhesives requires some way of overcoming the solubility problem. A potential solution is the use of one of the relatively few solvents in which tamsulosin is readily soluble, and using additional excipients to allow the tamsulosin solution to be mixed with the polyisobutylene adhesive and to produce a pharmaceutically acceptable dosage form (e.g., from the irritation point of view).


For example, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) may potentially be used. The table below gives some data on the solubility of tamsulosin in DMSO and in mixtures of DMSO and water:















Water
Solubility of




in DMSO
Tamsulosin
Solubility of
Solubility of


(w/w %)
(w/w %)
Tamsulosin (mg/g)
Tamsulosin (Log Cs)


















0
23.0
230
2.362


8.85
7.29
72.9
1.863


16.85
3.02
30.2
1.479


29.19
0.52
0.52
0.715









It may be seen from the data in the table above that as long as the water content of the DMSO is maintained below certain limits, the tamsulosin may be solubilized in DMSO-water blends.


A patch may also be made with certain other aprotic solvents, for example dimethylacetamide (DMAc) and N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP), rather than DMSO.


It is also necessary to maintain skin irritation at no more than a tolerable level. Conventionally, the use of DMSO is seen as potentially increasing skin irritation. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,855,294 suggests that patches containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) would require an emollient, for example glycerin, to be sufficiently non-irritating.


It has surprisingly been discovered that appropriate proportions of DMSO, a co-solubilizer, and a lipophilic permeation enhancer allow tamsulosin to be delivered with acceptable irritation and good transdermal flux from a polyisobutylene adhesive.


The co-solubilizer may be, for example, an unsaturated fatty acid or a-hydroxy acid. The co-solubilizer may be, for example, CH3(CH2)m(CH═CH)nCOOH where m is an integer between 8 to 16, n is from 1 to 3, and the n CH═CH units may be arranged in any order within the chain of m CH2. Alternatively, the co-solubilizer may be R(OHCHCOOH) where R is an alkyl group with 1 to 6 carbons arranged either linear or branched, in an enantiomeric or racemic form. The co-solubilizer may be, for example, oleic acid, linoleic acid, or linolenic acid (fatty acids). The co-solubilizer may be, for example, lactic acid or glycolic acid (a-hydroxy acids).


The lipophilic permeation enhancer may be chosen from a wide range of such compounds known in the art. A review of permeation enhancers is found, for example, in Nadir Büyüktimkin et al., “Chemical Means of Transdermal Drug Permeation Enhancement,” chapter 11 of Transdermal and Topical Drug Delivery Systems (Tapash K. Ghosh et al. eds. 1997).


A useful class of lipophilic permeation enhancers has the formula CH3(CH2)mCOOR′. Here m is an integer in the range of 6 to 14, and R′ is a C1-C3 lower alkyl residue that is either unsubstituted or substituted with one, two, or three hydroxyl groups. A further useful class of lipophilic permeation enhancers has the formula CH3(CH2)m—OCOCHR1R2, where m is as above and R1 and R2 are hydrogen, hydroxyl, or C1-C2 lower alkyl, and at least one of R1 and R2 is hydroxyl or both R1 and R2 are hydrogen. Preferred permeation enhancers for use with the patches of the invention include methyl laurate, propylene glycol monolaurate, glycerol monolaurate, glycerol monooleate, lauryl lactate, myristyl lactate, and dodecyl acetate.


A matrix modifier is also useful in making a transdermal patch comprising tamsulosin. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the matrix modifier facilitates homogenization of the adhesive matrix. Sorption of hydrophilic moieties is a possible mechanism for this process. Thus, known matrix modifiers which are to some degree water-sorbent may be used. For example, possible matrix modifiers include colloidal silicone dioxide, fumed silica, cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), soluble PVP, cellulose derivatives (e.g. hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC)), polyacrylamide, polyacrylic acid, a polyacrylic acid salt, or a clay such as kaolin or bentonite. An exemplary commercial fumed silica product is Cab-O-Sil (Cabot Corporation, Boston, Mass.). The hydrophilic mixtures described in U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2003/0170308 may also be employed, for example mixtures of PVP and PEG or of PVP, PEG, and a water-swellable polymer such as Eudragit® L100-55.


Patches of the invention may be designed to be replaced, for example, once per week, so that they continue delivering significant amounts of active at 168 hours from patch application. With some patches of the invention, the time of maximum tamsulosin flux may be at least 60 hours, at least 75 hours, or at least 90 hours.


In understanding the performance of patches of the invention, it may be useful to consider the comparative flux of tamsulosin and DMSO. In general DMSO is present in larger amounts in the patch, for example in a DMSO/tamsulosin weight ratio of at least about 1.2, at least about 1.4, or at least about 1.8. The DMSO will generally be released more rapidly from the patch than the tamsulosin, as seen in Example 12 below. It is desirable, however, to control the ratio of tamsulosin/DMSO cumulative release. For example, the ratio of tamsulosin/DMSO cumulative release may be at least about 0.05 in the time period 72 hours to 120 hours after administration or at least about 0.08, 0.1, or 0.15 in the time period 120 hours to 168 hours. The ratio may also be, for example, no more than about 0.15 in the first 72 hours, no more than about 0.38 in the time period 72 hours to 120 hours, and no more than about 0.5, 0.6, or 0.8 in the time period from 120 to 168 hours.


As noted above, an alpha-hydroxy acid may be employed in the patches. The molar ratio of this acid to tamsulosin may be, for example, at least about 0.05, at least about 0.10, or at least about 0.20.


B. Methods of Making Patches


In a further aspect of this invention, a transdermal patch comprising tamsulosin is made by a process in which the active is used in the form of tamsulosin hydrochloride. For a variety of reasons, tamsulosin hydrochloride is an advantageous starting form of the active. For example, in the commercial oral dosage form, tamsulosin is in the hydrochloride form.


The following describes generally a class of processes for manufacturing a transdermal drug-in-adhesive patch for delivery of tamsulosin. Tamsulosin or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of tamsulosin is dissolved in an aprotic solvent. The tamsulosin solution is combined with a lipophilic permeation enhancer, an optional organic solvent, and an unsaturated fatty acid. A matrix modifier is added and the resulting solution is homogenized. The solution is then mixed with a polyisobutylene adhesive or hydrophobic synthetic rubber adhesive in a suitable solvent. It may be, for example, solvent cast or extruded.


Example 1 describes a method for making a transdermal tamsulosin patch using tamsulosin base. As may be seen, a peak in vitro flux of above about 2 μg/cm2-h is achieved.


In order to produce a transdermal patch which is made with tamsulosin salts e.g., tamsulosin hydrochloride, it is helpful to use a neutralizing agent as a process aid and mix it into the solution containing the tamsulosin salt prior to mixing that solution with the polyisobutylene adhesive, allowing a period of reaction in that solution. The neutralizing agents should have pKa equivalent or higher than that of tamsulosin. These neutralizing agents are alkali hydroxides and alkali salts (e.g. NaOH, KOH, Na2CO3, etc). Examples 2, 3, and 7 show some ways in which patches can be made with tamsulosin hydrochloride. With a suitable neutralizing agent, the final patch contains sufficient tamsulosin base to provide adequate delivery of the active across skin, as shown by the results of the examples. For example, a peak flux of at least about 0.01 μg/cm2-hr, at least about 1.0 μg/cm2-hr, at least about 1.5 μg/cm2-hr, or at least about 2.0 μg/cm2-hr may be achieved. (Similar fluxes can be achieved with patches made starting with tamsulosin base.)


It is in general desirable to have a relatively low coat weight in a transdermal formulation. One reason for this is that with lower coat weights and thus thinner patches, it may be possible to solvent-cast the patch rather than extruding it, a process which is somewhat more complex. For example, it may be desirable to have a coat weight of no more than about 10 mg/cm2, about 15 mg/cm2, about 20 mg/cm2, about 25 mg/cm2, about 30 mg/cm2, about 35 mg/cm2, about 40 mg/cm2, or about 50 mg/cm2. With poorly soluble drugs a limitation on the coat weight is the need to have sufficient adhesive matrix per cm2 of skin surface to hold the needed amount of drug to achieve extended duration of delivery with a patch of reasonable size. Thus the use of particular solvents as disclosed in this application can be helpful in achieving a desirably low coat weight, by allowing a higher weight ratio of active to total adhesive matrix. For example, it may be desirable to have a ratio of at least about 1% active to total adhesive matrix, at least about 2% active to total adhesive matrix, at least about 3%, at least about 3.5%, at least about 4%, or at least about 5%.


As noted earlier, the patches of the invention may be made, for example, by melt extrusion or by solvent casting. In an extrusion process, the components of the composition are weighed out and then admixed, for example using a Brabender or Baker Perkins Blender, generally although not necessarily at an elevated temperature, e.g., about 90 to 170° C., typically 100 to 140° C. Solvents may be added if desired. The resulting composition can be extruded using a single or twin extruder, or pelletized. Alternatively, the individual components can be dissolved or melted one at a time, and then mixed prior to extrusion. The composition can be extruded to a desired thickness directly onto a suitable substrate or backing member. The composition can be also extruded first, and then be pressed against a backing member or laminated to a backing member.


Alternatively, the compositions may be prepared by solution casting, by admixing the components in a suitable solvent, at a solids concentration which may be in the range of about 15 to 60% w/v. The solution is cast onto a substrate, backing member or releasable liner, as above. Both admixture and casting are preferably carried out at ambient temperature. The material coated with the film is then baked at a temperature above ambient, for example a temperature in the range of about 40 to 130° C., for a time period in the range of 5 minutes to 70 minutes.


C. Other Possible Components in Patches


The patches of the invention may comprise one or more additional actives to be administered with the tamsulosin. Corticosteroids have been suggested, for example, as useful for lithiasis in conjunction with tamsulosin. The patent literature suggests a large number of cotherapy combinations with tamsulosin. Exemplary recent U.S. patents mentioning concurrent administration of tamsulosin and other actives include U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,354,581; 7,332,482; 7,317,029; 7,288,558; 7,271,175; 7,211,599; 7,138,405; and 6,423,719.


In addition, the compositions and methods of the invention should be useful for making patches containing other actives which have adhesive matrix solubility issues similar to tamsulosin, so that they are dissolvable in a desired adhesive matrix no more than about 0.5%, 1% or 2%. Thus, these compositions and methods, although developed for tamsulosin, may be useful for the delivery of actives other than tamsulosin, not in combination with tamsulosin.


Various additives, known to those skilled in the art, may be included in transdermal compositions. Optional additives include opacifiers, antioxidants, fragrance, colorant, gelling agents, thickening agents, stabilizers, and the like. Other agents may also be added, such as antimicrobial agents, to prevent spoilage upon storage, i.e., to inhibit growth of microbes such as yeasts and molds. Suitable antimicrobial agents are typically selected from the group consisting of the methyl and propyl esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (i.e., methyl and propyl paraben), sodium benzoate, sorbic acid, imidurea, and combinations thereof.


While it is believed that the low irritation shown to be achieved in Examples 4-6 is acceptable, the formulation may also contain irritation-mitigating additives to minimize or eliminate the possibility of skin irritation or skin damage resulting from the drug, the enhancer, or other components of the formulation. Suitable irritation-mitigating additives include, for example: α-tocopherol; monoamine oxidase inhibitors, particularly phenyl alcohols such as 2-phenyl-1-ethanol; glycerin; salicylic acids and salicylates; ascorbic acids and ascorbates; ionophores such as monensin; amphiphilic amines; ammonium chloride; N-acetylcysteine; cis-urocanic acid; capsaicin; and chloroquine. Corticosteriods are also known in art as irritation-mitigating additives.


It is possible to employ a combination of permeation enhancers. The permeation enhancers listed in Büyüktimkin et al., supra, provide a range of choices to the formulator. Possible enhancers include, for example, the following: ethers such as diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (available commercially as Transcutol®) and diethylene glycol monomethyl ether; surfactants such as sodium laurate, sodium lauryl sulfate, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, benzalkonium chloride, Poloxamer (231, 182, 184), Tween® (20, 40, 60, 80) and lecithin (U.S. Pat. No. 4,783,450); the 1-substituted azacycloheptan-2-ones, particularly 1-n-dodecylcyclazacycloheptan-2-one (available under the trademark Azone® from Nelson Research & Development Co., Irvine, Calif.; see U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,989,816; 4,316,893; 4,405,616; and 4,557,934); alcohols such as ethanol, propanol, octanol, decanol, benzyl alcohol, and the like; fatty acids such as lauric acid, oleic acid and valeric acid; fatty acid esters such as isopropyl myristate, isopropyl palmitate, methylpropionate, and ethyl oleate; polyols and esters thereof such as propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, glycerol, butanediol, polyethylene glycol, and polyethylene glycol monolaurate (“PEGML”; see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,568,343); amides and other nitrogenous compounds such as urea, dimethylacetamide (DMA), dimethylformamide (DMF), 2-pyrrolidone, 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, ethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine; terpenes; alkanones; and organic acids, particularly salicylic acid and salicylates, citric acid and succinic acid.


In a common overall design of a transdermal patch, there is provided an adhesive matrix containing active as described above. The adhesive matrix may contain additional components besides those already described, for example a non-woven material which may, for example, assist in providing mechanical stability. The adhesive matrix may be provided in the form of a thin square or circle or other usually convex shape of flat material. On one side of the flat adhesive matrix, there is a release liner, and on the other side a backing layer. The release liner is intended to be removed before use, and the backing layer is intended to remain attached to the adhesive matrix in use. It may be convenient to have multiple adhesive layers, not all necessarily containing active.


The backing layer of the transdermal drug delivery device functions as the primary structural element of the transdermal system and provides the device with flexibility, drape and, optionally, occlusivity. The material used for the backing layer should be inert and incapable of absorbing drug, enhancer or other components of the pharmaceutical composition contained within the device. The material used for the backing layer should permit the device to follow the contours of the skin and be worn comfortably on areas of skin such as at joints or other points of flexure, that are normally subjected to mechanical strain with little or no likelihood of the device disengaging from the skin due to differences in the flexibility or resiliency of the skin and the device. Examples of materials useful for the backing layer are polyesters, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyurethanes and polyether amides. The layer is preferably in the range of about 1 micron to about 250 microns in thickness, and may, if desired, be pigmented, metallized, or provided with a matte finish suitable for writing. The layer is preferably occlusive, i.e., is preferably impermeable to moisture, for example with an MVTR (moisture vapor transmission rate) less than about 50 g/m2-day.


The release liner is desirably made from a drug/vehicle impermeable material, and is a disposable element which serves only to protect the device prior to application. Typically, the release liner is formed from a material impermeable to the components of the device and the pharmaceutical composition contained therein.


Additional layers, e.g., intermediate fabric or nonwoven layers and/or rate-controlling membranes, may also be present in transdermal patches of the invention. Fabric or nonwoven layers may be used to improve mechanical stability, while a rate-controlling membrane may be used to control the rate at which a component permeates out of the device.


The practice of the present invention will employ, unless otherwise indicated, conventional techniques of drug formulation, particularly topical drug formulation, which are within the skill of the art. Such techniques are fully explained in the literature. See, e.g., Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy (19th ed., Easton, Pa.: Mack Publishing Co., 1995).


It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with preferred specific embodiments thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications within the scope of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains.


All patents, patent applications, and publications mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. However, where a patent, patent application, or publication containing express definitions is incorporated by reference, those express definitions should be understood to apply to the incorporated patent, patent application, or publication in which they are found, and not to the remainder of the text of this application, in particular the claims of this application.


EXAMPLES

The following examples are put forth so as to provide those of ordinary skill in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how to manufacture the transdermal patches of the invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of that which the inventors regard as the invention. Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers (e.g., amounts, temperatures, etc.) but some errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unless indicated otherwise, parts are parts by weight, temperature is in degrees Celsius (° C.), and pressure is at or near atmospheric.


Example 1

Tamsulosin base was accurately weighed and dissolved in an aprotic solvent, dimethylsulfoxide, by vortexing. Lauryl lactate and oleic acid were added and mixed into the DMSO/drug solution. The heterogeneous mixture was homogenized with Cab-O-Sil. The homogenate was mixed with polyisobutylene/n-heptane solution for more than 3 hr to form a uniform coating mix. The formulation was coated and dried. The final formulation has a composition as given in the following table.


















PIB
69.50% 



Cab-O-Sil
7.00%



Tamuslosin
3.50%



Lauryl lactate
6.00%



Oleic acid
5.00%



DMSO
9.00%



Total
100.0% 










The PIB adhesive solution was prepared by mixing Oppanol B-100, Oppanol B-12, and Indopol H1900 in heptane.


The formulations were tested for tamsulosin skin penetration using cadaver skin on Franz diffusion cells. An in vitro skin flux study was done at 32-35° C. using phosphate buffer pH 6.0 with 0.01% sodium azide as receptor media. Samples at different time intervals were collected and tamsulosin was quantified by reversed phase HPLC method. Results are given in FIG. 1.


Example 2

Tamsulosin HCl is accurately weighed and dissolved in an aprotic solvent, dimethylsulfoxide, by vortexing. An appropriate volume of 2N aqueous sodium hydroxide is mixed with the tamsulosin-HCl salt solution and stirred at ambient temperature for 22 hours.


Following completion of the reaction as described above, lauryl lactate and oleic acid were added. The mixture was homogenized with Cab-O-Sil. The homogenate was mixed with polyisobutylene/n-heptane solution for more than 3 hr to form a uniform coating mix. The formulation was coated and dried. The final formulation has a composition as given in the following table.


















PIB
68.86% 



Cab-O-Sil
7.00%



Tamuslosin-HCl
3.80%



Lauryl lactate
6.00%



Oleic acid
5.00%



NaOH
0.34%



DMSO
9.00%



Total
100.0% 










The formulation was tested for skin penetration as in Example 1. Results are given in FIG. 1.


Example 3

Same as Example 2, except 20% methanolic sodium hydroxide solution was used in place of aqueous sodium hydroxide. The reaction mixture remained clear after reaction. The formulation was tested for skin penetration as in Example 1. Results are given in FIG. 2. The Example 1 formulation was tested again for skin flux using different skin. Results are given in FIG. 2.


Examples 4-6
Formulation and Irritation Testing

Examples 4, 5, and 6 formulations were prepared from tamsulosin base using the ingredient combinations in the following table:


















Ingredient
Ex 4
Ex 5
Ex 6





















PIB adhesive
75.5
69.5
74.5



DMSO
3.0
9.0
6.0



Lauryl lactate
6.0
6.0
6.0



Oleic acid
5.0
5.0
3.0



Cab-O-Sil
7.0
7.0
7.0



Tamsulosin base
3.5
3.5
3.5










Tamsulosin base was dissolved in DMSO. Lauryl lactate and oleic acid were added to the DMSO drug solution. Cab-O-Sil was suspended in the solution by homogenization and then the solution was mixed with PIB solution. The adhesive formulation solution was coated at 3 mils on drying. The two adhesive layers were laminated on each side of a Reemay 2250 non-woven polyester fabric layer. The PIB adhesive was prepared by mixing Oppanol B-100, Oppanol B-12, and Indopol H1900 in heptane.


A skin irritation study was done on New Zealand white rabbits. The test articles (active formulation) and control (placebo formulation) were applied to the skin of same animal for 24 hr. A primary irritation index (PII) was calculated based on erythema and edema scores at 24 and 72 hr after patch removal. The results are given in the following table. The active and placebo formulations of Examples 4, 5 and 6 were classified as mildly skin irritating as the primary skin irritation index for all test articles was in the range of 0.9 to 1.9.


Example 7
Formulation, In Vitro Skin Flux, and Irritation Testing

A scale up batch of Tamsulosin HCl adhesive mix was prepared based on the composition as given in the following table.

















Material Name
Wet Formula %
Dry Formula %




















PIB adhesive mix
40.165
69.2



Dimethylsulfoxide
12.250
9.0



Tamsulosin HCl
1.330
3.8



NaOH, added as 2N
1.610




aqueous solution



Lauryl Lactate
2.450
6.0



Organic solvent mix
37.96




Oleic Acid
1.750
5.0



Cab-O-Sil
2.450
7.0



Total
100.000
100.0










Tamsulosin HCl transdermal delivery system (Tamsulosin HCl TDS) was prepared from the mix and irritation was tested. Tamsulosin HCl was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide in a glass bottle. 2N NaOH solution in water was mixed with the tamsulosin-HCl salt solution and stirred. Following completion of the reaction described above, the solution was transferred to a dispersion mixer. Then lauryl lactate and oleic acid was added with the organic solvents and the mixture was dispersed with Cab-O-Sil. The dispersion homogenate was mixed with polyisobutylene/n-heptane solution in a mixing tank until a uniform coating mix is formed. The formulation was coated and dried. The formulation was tested for skin penetration as in Example 1 with multiple donors. Results are given in FIG. 3.


A skin irritation study was done on Specific Pathogen Free New Zealand white rabbits. Test articles (active formulation) and controls (placebo formulation) were applied on intact skin of the same animal for 24 hr. A primary irritation score (PIS) or index (PII) were calculated based on erythema and edema scores at 24, 48 and 72 hr after patch removal. Both test and placebo test articles were classified as slightly irritating, having primary irritation score or index in the range of 0.9 to 1.9.


Example 8

Same as Example 1, except that 5.0% linoleic acid was used instead of oleic acid. The formulation was tested for skin penetration as in Example 1. Results are given in FIG. 4.


Example 9

Same as Example 1, except that 5.0% linolenic acid was used instead of 5.0% oleic acid. The formulation was tested for skin penetration as in Example 1. Results are given in FIG. 4.


Example 10

Same as Example 1, 2.0 and 1.5% of lactic acid (an α-hydroxy acid) were used instead of oleic acid. The formulation was tested for skin penetration as in Example 1. Results are given in FIG. 5.


Example 11

Four formulations C1, C2, C3, C4 were prepared as described above with the following compositions.


















C1 (wt %)
C2 (wt %)
C3 (wt %)
C4 (wt %)




















Tamsulosin base
7.0
7.0
9.0
9.0


Colloidal silica
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0


Oleic acid
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0


Lactic acid
2.0
2.0
2.75
2.75


Dimethysulfoxide
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0


Lauryl lactate
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00


PIB adhesive mix
63.0
63.0
60.25
60.25


Dry thickness
6.0 mils
12.0 mils
6.0 mils
12.0 mils









To achieve the 12 mil thickness, a quadruple casting process was used.



FIGS. 6A and 6B depict the tamsulosin release achieved with formulations C1 through C4. As may be seen, the thicker formulations achieve higher fluxes. The testing was done with cadaver skin described as high permeability.


Example 12

Further patches C5, C6, and C7 were prepared as shown in the following table

















C5 (wt %)
C6 (wt %)
C7 (wt %)





















Tamsulosin base
9.0
9.0
9.0



Colloidal silica
7.0
7.0
7.0



Oleic acid
5.0
5.0
5.0



Lactic acid
3.0
3.0
3.0



Dimethylsulfoxide
10.0
10.0
10.0



Lauryl lactate
6.00
6.00
6.00



RIB adhesive mix
60.0
60.0
60.0



Dry thickness
6.0 mils
10.0 mils
12.0 mils










For patches C5, C6, and C7, both tamsulosin and DMSO release were measured in a Franz diffusion cell. The patches were tested against four lots of cadaver skin.


The following table gives the cumulative release of tamsulosin and DMSO in micrograms/cm2, and the ratio of tamsulosin to DMSO cumulative release, for patches C5, C6, and C7:


















Time
DMSO
Tamsulosin
DMSO
Tamsulosin
Ratio
Ratio


(h)
C5
C5
C6
C6
C5
C6





















24
533.62
6.79
929.25
11.47
0.01
0.01


48
1090.88
70.31
1651.05
76.78
0.06
0.05


72
1399.20
199.49
2011.94
195.03
0.14
0.10


96
1544.37
346.86
2163.58
329.54
0.22
0.15


120
1609.56
491.05
2229.31
466.23
0.31
0.21


144
1638.04
615.19
2257.65
591.09
0.38
0.26


168
1649.40
729.69
2270.15
706.37
0.44
0.31

























Time (h)
DMSO C7
Tamsulosin C7
Ratio C7





















24
786.12
6.02
0.01



48
1892.56
68.76
0.04



72
2607.60
230.81
0.09



96
2925.31
439.46
0.15



120
3097.52
667.79
0.22



144
3175.08
881.95
0.28



168
3214.69
1089.49
0.34









Claims
  • 1. A composition for delivery of tamsulosin, comprising an adhesive matrix comprised of: polyisobutylene;a solvent selected from dimethylacetamide, n-methylpyrrolidone and dimethylsulfoxide;a mixture of an unsaturated fatty acid and an alpha-hydroxy acid;a permeation enhancer of the formula CH3(CH2)mOCOCHR1R2, where m is an integer in the range of 6 to 14,R1 and R2 are each independently selected from hydrogen, hydroxyl, and a C1-C2 lower alkyl group, wherein at least one of R1 and R2 is hydroxyl or both R1 and R2 are hydrogen, andtamsulosin.
  • 2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the solvent is dimethylsulfoxide.
  • 3. The composition of claim 2, wherein the adhesive matrix comprises dimethylsulfoxide and tamsulosin in a weight ratio of at least 1.2.
  • 4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the adhesive matrix comprises a molar ratio of alpha-hydroxy acid to tamsulosin of at least 0.1.
  • 5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the unsaturated fatty acid is selected from the group consisting of oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid.
  • 6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the unsaturated fatty acid is a fatty acid with 11 to 21 carbon atoms.
  • 7. The composition of claim 1, comprising at least about 40 wt % polyisobutylene.
  • 8. The composition of claim 1, wherein the permeation enhancer is present at about 1-20 wt %.
  • 9. The composition of claim 1, wherein the permeation enhancer is either methyl laurate or lauryl lactate.
  • 10. The composition of claim 1, wherein tamsulosin is tamsulosin base.
  • 11. The composition of claim 1, wherein the adhesive matrix further comprises colloidal silicone dioxide or fumed silica.
  • 12. The composition of claim 1, wherein tamsulosin is a salt of tamsulosin and the matrix further comprises a neutralizing agent.
  • 13. A method for administering tamsulosin, comprising: providing to a subject a composition according to claim 1.
  • 14. A method for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, comprising: providing to a subject a composition according to claim 1.
  • 15. The composition of claim 1, wherein the alpha-hydroxy acid is selected from the group consisting of lactic acid and glycolic acid.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/687,586, filed Jan. 14, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,784,879, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/144,728, filed Jan. 14, 2009, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (360)
Number Name Date Kind
2561071 Prisk Jul 1951 A
2579403 Slomowitz et al. Dec 1951 A
3150977 Hart et al. Sep 1964 A
3689439 Field et al. Sep 1972 A
3721657 Seiderman Mar 1973 A
3749755 Bronstart et al. Jul 1973 A
3852228 Brothers Dec 1974 A
3957605 Assarsson et al. May 1976 A
3993551 Assarsson et al. Nov 1976 A
3996934 Zaffaroni Dec 1976 A
4091090 Sipos May 1978 A
4093673 Chang et al. Jun 1978 A
4160020 Ayer et al. Jul 1979 A
4231369 Sorensen et al. Nov 1980 A
4277580 Allen et al. Jul 1981 A
4325851 Colon et al. Apr 1982 A
4346709 Schmitt et al. Aug 1982 A
4367732 Poulsen et al. Jan 1983 A
4369229 Shah Jan 1983 A
4492685 Keith et al. Jan 1985 A
4529601 Broberg et al. Jul 1985 A
4552751 Inaba et al. Nov 1985 A
4557934 Cooper Dec 1985 A
4562060 Broberg et al. Dec 1985 A
4568343 Leeper et al. Feb 1986 A
4587289 Comert et al. May 1986 A
4593053 Jevne et al. Jun 1986 A
4624665 Nuwayser Nov 1986 A
4699146 Sieverding Oct 1987 A
4713243 Schiraldi et al. Dec 1987 A
4743249 Loveland May 1988 A
4750482 Sieverding Jun 1988 A
4771105 Shirai et al. Sep 1988 A
4849224 Chang et al. Jul 1989 A
4863738 Taskovich Sep 1989 A
4863970 Patel et al. Sep 1989 A
4867748 Samuelsen Sep 1989 A
4871536 Arraudeau et al. Oct 1989 A
4873299 Nawoakosky et al. Oct 1989 A
4877628 Stypula Oct 1989 A
4904247 Therriault et al. Feb 1990 A
4906169 Chien et al. Mar 1990 A
4927408 Haak et al. May 1990 A
4945084 Packman Jul 1990 A
4953053 Pratt Aug 1990 A
4973468 Chiang et al. Nov 1990 A
4983395 Chang et al. Jan 1991 A
5023084 Chien et al. Jun 1991 A
5053227 Chiang et al. Oct 1991 A
5057500 Thornfeldt Oct 1991 A
5073381 Ivan et al. Dec 1991 A
5102662 Gallagher Apr 1992 A
5125894 Phipps et al. Jun 1992 A
5133970 Petereit et al. Jul 1992 A
5141750 Lee et al. Aug 1992 A
5173302 Holmblad et al. Dec 1992 A
5183901 Login et al. Feb 1993 A
5196405 Packman Mar 1993 A
5200190 Azuma et al. Apr 1993 A
5206385 Login et al. Apr 1993 A
5224928 Sibalis et al. Jul 1993 A
5232702 Pfister et al. Aug 1993 A
5234690 Chiang et al. Aug 1993 A
5234957 Mantelle Aug 1993 A
5240995 Gyory et al. Aug 1993 A
5254346 Tucker et al. Oct 1993 A
5270358 Asmus Dec 1993 A
5276079 Duan et al. Jan 1994 A
5296512 Beier et al. Mar 1994 A
5300291 Sablotsky et al. Apr 1994 A
5310563 Curtis et al. May 1994 A
5322689 Hughes et al. Jun 1994 A
5326685 Gaglio et al. Jul 1994 A
5332576 Mantelle Jul 1994 A
5338490 Dietz et al. Aug 1994 A
5342623 Enscore et al. Aug 1994 A
5344394 Gyory et al. Sep 1994 A
5354823 Tseng et al. Oct 1994 A
5362420 Itoh et al. Nov 1994 A
5376377 Gale et al. Dec 1994 A
5422119 Casper Jun 1995 A
5438076 Friedman et al. Aug 1995 A
5446070 Mantelle Aug 1995 A
5456745 Roreger et al. Oct 1995 A
5462743 Turner et al. Oct 1995 A
5462745 Enscore et al. Oct 1995 A
5492943 Stempel Feb 1996 A
5508024 Tranner Apr 1996 A
5508367 Zajaczkowski Apr 1996 A
5527271 Shah et al. Jun 1996 A
5543148 Lapidus Aug 1996 A
5563153 Mueller et al. Oct 1996 A
5575654 Fontenot Nov 1996 A
5593686 Kissel et al. Jan 1997 A
5594068 Buchanan et al. Jan 1997 A
5599373 Zanuccoli Feb 1997 A
5614178 Bloon et al. Mar 1997 A
5614586 Tang et al. Mar 1997 A
5631267 Gleich et al. May 1997 A
5633010 Chen May 1997 A
5641504 Lee et al. Jun 1997 A
5641507 DeVillez Jun 1997 A
5643187 Naestoft et al. Jul 1997 A
5645062 Anderson et al. Jul 1997 A
5645855 Lorenz Jul 1997 A
5656286 Miranda et al. Aug 1997 A
5660178 Kantner et al. Aug 1997 A
5662925 Ebert et al. Sep 1997 A
5663010 Stocchiero Sep 1997 A
5674561 Dietz et al. Oct 1997 A
5700478 Biegajski et al. Dec 1997 A
5702721 Horstmann et al. Dec 1997 A
5718187 Pollock et al. Feb 1998 A
5718886 Pellico Feb 1998 A
5719197 Kanios et al. Feb 1998 A
5723145 Shikinami et al. Mar 1998 A
5725876 Mantelle et al. Mar 1998 A
5726250 Zajaczkowski Mar 1998 A
5730999 Lehmann et al. Mar 1998 A
5744155 Friedman et al. Apr 1998 A
5762956 Chien Jun 1998 A
5770220 Meconi et al. Jun 1998 A
5773490 Shikinami et al. Jun 1998 A
5780050 Jain et al. Jul 1998 A
5785527 Jensen et al. Jul 1998 A
5785976 Westesen et al. Jul 1998 A
5788983 Chien et al. Aug 1998 A
5800832 Tapolsky et al. Sep 1998 A
5804611 Takoh et al. Sep 1998 A
5827213 Jensen Oct 1998 A
5827525 Liao et al. Oct 1998 A
5830932 Kay Nov 1998 A
5837713 Gliech et al. Nov 1998 A
5843472 Ma Dec 1998 A
5846558 Nielsen et al. Dec 1998 A
5851549 Svec Dec 1998 A
5853755 Foldvari Dec 1998 A
5857992 Haak et al. Jan 1999 A
5858332 Jensen et al. Jan 1999 A
5858410 Muller et al. Jan 1999 A
5863662 Hornby et al. Jan 1999 A
5876746 Jona et al. Mar 1999 A
5879691 Sagel et al. Mar 1999 A
5879701 Audett Mar 1999 A
5891453 Sagel et al. Apr 1999 A
5894017 Sagel et al. Apr 1999 A
5900249 Smith May 1999 A
5902598 Chen et al. May 1999 A
5911980 Samour et al. Jun 1999 A
5912271 Brodine et al. Jun 1999 A
5916587 Min et al. Jun 1999 A
5942543 Ernst Aug 1999 A
5945032 Breitenbach et al. Aug 1999 A
5945457 Plate et al. Aug 1999 A
5948416 Wagner et al. Sep 1999 A
5948430 Zerbe et al. Sep 1999 A
5948433 Burton et al. Sep 1999 A
5958379 Regenold et al. Sep 1999 A
5958446 Miranda et al. Sep 1999 A
5958984 Devillez Sep 1999 A
5962011 DeVillez Oct 1999 A
5972377 Jona et al. Oct 1999 A
5976565 Fotinos Nov 1999 A
5985311 Cordes et al. Nov 1999 A
5985860 Toppo Nov 1999 A
5985990 Kantner et al. Nov 1999 A
5989569 Dirksing et al. Nov 1999 A
5990179 Gyori et al. Nov 1999 A
5993836 Castillo Nov 1999 A
5993849 Assmus et al. Nov 1999 A
5997886 Peffly et al. Dec 1999 A
6004566 Freidman et al. Dec 1999 A
6004578 Lee Dec 1999 A
6007837 Enscore et al. Dec 1999 A
6024976 Miranda et al. Feb 2000 A
6045811 Dirksing et al. Apr 2000 A
6051609 Yu et al. Apr 2000 A
6063399 Assmus et al. May 2000 A
6068650 Hofmann et al. May 2000 A
6072100 Mooney et al. Jun 2000 A
6075626 Mizutani et al. Jun 2000 A
6083421 Huang et al. Jul 2000 A
6093328 Santina Jul 2000 A
6096328 Sagal et al. Aug 2000 A
6135126 Joshi Oct 2000 A
6142939 Eppstein et al. Nov 2000 A
6146654 Kubo Nov 2000 A
6153215 Samuelsen et al. Nov 2000 A
6162456 Dunbar et al. Dec 2000 A
6165499 Kleinsorgen et al. Dec 2000 A
6177096 Zerbe et al. Jan 2001 B1
6193993 Murahashi et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197331 Lerner et al. Mar 2001 B1
6201164 Wulff et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212671 Kanehira et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221341 Montgomery Apr 2001 B1
6221383 Miranda et al. Apr 2001 B1
6231885 Carrara May 2001 B1
6248363 Patel et al. Jun 2001 B1
6264981 Zhang et al. Jul 2001 B1
6270792 Guillemet et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275728 Venkatraman et al. Aug 2001 B1
6306370 Jensen et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312666 Oxman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6312670 Montgomery Nov 2001 B1
6316022 Mantelle et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322774 Jensen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6329472 Kim et al. Dec 2001 B1
6368576 Jensen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6419905 Alvarez Hernandez Jul 2002 B1
6419906 Xu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6451240 Sherman et al. Sep 2002 B1
6451777 Bradbury et al. Sep 2002 B1
6461636 Arth et al. Oct 2002 B1
6488913 Orlowski et al. Dec 2002 B2
6517350 Diasti et al. Feb 2003 B2
6552147 Parker et al. Apr 2003 B2
6558654 McLaughlin May 2003 B2
6562363 Mantelle et al. May 2003 B1
6576712 Feldstein et al. Jun 2003 B2
6585997 Moro et al. Jul 2003 B2
6591124 Sherman et al. Jul 2003 B2
6596298 Leung et al. Jul 2003 B2
6602912 Hsu et al. Aug 2003 B2
6611706 Avrahami et al. Aug 2003 B2
6638528 Kanios Oct 2003 B1
6656493 Dzija Dec 2003 B2
6667410 Magnus et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673363 Luo et al. Jan 2004 B2
6682721 Kim et al. Jan 2004 B2
6689344 Chang et al. Feb 2004 B2
6696459 Jones et al. Feb 2004 B1
6708060 Avrahami et al. Mar 2004 B1
6709671 Zerbe et al. Mar 2004 B2
6711435 Avrahami Mar 2004 B2
6714497 Yeo et al. Mar 2004 B2
6750291 Kim et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759030 Kosti Jul 2004 B2
6762202 Marek et al. Jul 2004 B2
6780401 Kim et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783769 Arth et al. Aug 2004 B1
6803420 Cleary et al. Oct 2004 B2
6805874 Lutz et al. Oct 2004 B1
6806308 Zajac Oct 2004 B2
6884833 Cheang et al. Apr 2005 B2
6946142 Chang et al. Sep 2005 B2
6962691 Lulla et al. Nov 2005 B1
7078359 Stepanian et al. Jul 2006 B2
7112713 Sceusa Sep 2006 B2
7122199 Sagel et al. Oct 2006 B2
7138458 Cleary et al. Nov 2006 B2
7217853 Kulichikhin et al. May 2007 B2
7323161 Choi et al. Jan 2008 B2
7384650 Chien Jun 2008 B2
7456331 Kulichikhin et al. Nov 2008 B2
7744918 Yamaguchi et al. Jun 2010 B2
8206738 Singh et al. Jun 2012 B2
8273405 Feldstein et al. Sep 2012 B2
8481059 Cleary et al. Jul 2013 B2
8481071 Singh et al. Jul 2013 B2
8541021 Singh et al. Sep 2013 B2
8617647 Feldstein et al. Dec 2013 B2
8658201 Singh et al. Feb 2014 B2
8728445 Cleary et al. May 2014 B2
8741331 Singh et al. Jun 2014 B2
8753669 Cleary et al. Jun 2014 B2
8784879 Singh et al. Jul 2014 B2
8821901 Feldstein et al. Sep 2014 B2
8840918 Singh et al. Sep 2014 B2
9084723 Singh et al. Jul 2015 B2
9089481 Singh et al. Jul 2015 B2
20010006677 Mcginty et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010021374 Montgomery Sep 2001 A1
20010022964 Leung et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010046471 Marek et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010046511 Zerbe et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020004065 Kanios Jan 2002 A1
20020004190 Diasti et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020006387 Sagel Jan 2002 A1
20020009420 McLaughlin Jan 2002 A1
20020032240 Hsu et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020048602 Flore et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020058936 Avrahami et al. May 2002 A1
20020076487 Zajac Jun 2002 A1
20020094426 Stepanian et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106335 Orlowski et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120170 Magnus et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020131990 Barkalow et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020169411 Sherman et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020197284 Luo et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030035841 Dzija Feb 2003 A1
20030044446 Moro et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055190 Parker et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030059381 Goodhart et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030067855 Yeo et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030068376 Chen et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030082114 Kim et al. May 2003 A1
20030097127 Avrahami May 2003 A1
20030100654 Cheang et al. May 2003 A1
20030101507 Cleary et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030103427 Yeo et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030104041 Hsu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030130427 Cleary et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030133884 Chang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152528 Singh et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030152615 Houze et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030170308 Cleary et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030180229 Kosti Sep 2003 A1
20030194382 Chang et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199644 Choi Oct 2003 A1
20030225356 Kulichikhin et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030235549 Singh et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040005277 Willison et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040053901 Chien Mar 2004 A1
20040105834 Singh et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040136927 Kim et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040166147 Lundy et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040181183 Sceusa Sep 2004 A1
20040186132 Jones et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040213744 Lulla et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040219111 Kim et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040219113 Choi et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230227 Avrahami et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040258723 Singh et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050031554 Kim et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049365 Cleary et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050113510 Feldstein et al. May 2005 A1
20050208110 Singh et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050215727 Feldstein et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228113 Baumer et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251088 Kwon Nov 2005 A1
20050256223 Kolb et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060034905 Singh et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060089674 Walters et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060110434 Yamaguchi et al. May 2006 A1
20060168905 Blanc et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060171906 Singh et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060182788 Singh et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193793 Kim et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193794 Kim et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060257463 Elsohly et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070051376 Kulichikhin et al. Mar 2007 A1
20080161492 Cleary et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090155343 Kawahara et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090258060 Cleary et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100239644 Feldstein et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100291186 Singh et al. Nov 2010 A1
20120027695 Feldstein et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120237579 Singh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120321569 Feldstein et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130261526 Cleary et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130273127 Singh et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140044650 Singh et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140147489 Singh et al. May 2014 A1
20140271781 Singh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140322143 Feldstein et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140322284 Singh et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140371692 Cleary et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150080437 Lee et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150139919 Singh et al. May 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (99)
Number Date Country
2520985 Apr 2000 CA
2402021 Sep 2001 CA
2451431 Jan 2003 CA
2506073 Jun 2004 CA
2515128 Aug 2004 CA
2579492 Mar 2005 CA
8509793 May 1985 DE
4219368 Jun 1992 DE
19745208 Apr 1999 DE
0184470 Jun 1986 EP
0303445 Feb 1989 EP
0364211 Apr 1990 EP
0371421 Jun 1990 EP
0511782 Nov 1992 EP
0516026 Dec 1992 EP
0545594 Jun 1993 EP
0581581 Feb 1994 EP
0672094 Sep 1995 EP
0737477 Oct 1996 EP
0838225 Apr 1998 EP
0848960 Jun 1998 EP
1066823 Jan 2001 EP
2005952 Dec 2008 EP
2196197 Jun 2010 EP
1108837 Apr 1968 GB
58-162681 Sep 1983 JP
59-196817 Nov 1984 JP
01-151524 Jun 1989 JP
03-066612 Mar 1991 JP
03-247334 May 1991 JP
03-275619 Jun 1991 JP
04-266818 Sep 1992 JP
06-100467 Apr 1994 JP
08-092080 Jan 1996 JP
10-017448 Jan 1998 JP
2001-213768 Jul 2001 JP
2002-029949 Jan 2002 JP
2002-145746 May 2002 JP
20020045224 Jun 2002 KR
20030000299 Jan 2003 KR
20030000528 Jan 2003 KR
20030003969 Jan 2003 KR
20030003973 Jan 2003 KR
1459215 Nov 1995 SU
WO 8903859 May 1989 WO
WO 9007940 Jul 1990 WO
WO 9302717 Feb 1993 WO
WO 9405340 Mar 1994 WO
WO 9619205 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9640047 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9711676 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9820862 May 1998 WO
WO 9826763 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9837870 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9855044 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9911728 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9917738 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9944678 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9947128 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9954422 Oct 1999 WO
WO 9955312 Nov 1999 WO
WO 0016725 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0018365 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0061120 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0069421 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0101958 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0107018 Feb 2001 WO
WO 0126637 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0168045 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0187276 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0200182 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0204570 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0243657 Jun 2002 WO
WO 02087642 Nov 2002 WO
WO 02087645 Nov 2002 WO
WO 02089849 Nov 2002 WO
WO 03000216 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03011259 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03015748 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03089046 Oct 2003 WO
WO 03099344 Dec 2003 WO
WO 03101357 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2004000389 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2004024224 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004045569 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004054638 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004071323 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2004093786 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2004103201 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2005027768 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005074894 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2006017807 Feb 2006 WO
WO 2006029407 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2006069236 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006074173 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2006081497 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2006124639 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2007119656 Oct 2007 WO
WO 2010083035 Jul 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (69)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 11/150,811, filed Jun. 10, 2005, Feldstein et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/687,586, filed Jan. 11, 2009, Singh et al.
Emla Cream, (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%), EMLA Anesthetic Disc, (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream), “Topical anesthetic for dermal analgesia”, AstraZeneca Product Monograph, 46 pgs, Revised May 25, 2010.
“Aquasorb® A-500 Cellulose Gum (CMC)”, Hercules Incorporated, Aqualon Division, Product Data No. 4234, 2 pgs. (2005).
Aubin et al., “Analysis of the glass transition temperature of miscible polymer blends”, Macromolecules, vol. 21, pp. 2945-2949. (1988).
Bairamov et al., “Kinetic parameters of poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone) spontaneous mixing with short-chain poly(ethylene glycol)”, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 82, pp. 7-8, (2000).
Barbucci et al. “Swelling behavior of carboxymethylcellulose hydrogels in relation to cross-linking, pH, and charge density”, Macromolecules, vol. 33, No. 20, pp. 7475-7480 (2000).
Borodulina et al. “Viscoelasticity of Pressure-sensitive adhesive and bioadhesive hydrogels under compressive load”, Proceed. 24th Annual Meeting Adhesion Soc., pp. 147-149, (2001).
Chalykh et al., “Effects of composition and hydration on adhesive properties of poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)-poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels”, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 81, pp. 456-457, (1999).
Chalykh et al., “Fracture mechanics of poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)-poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel adhesive joints,” Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 81, pp. 427-428, (1999).
Chalykh et al., “Pressure-sensitive adhesion in the blends of poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone) and poly(ethylene glycol) of disparate chain lengths,” J. Adhesion, vol. 78, pp. 667-694, (2002).
Cleary et. al., A new polymer blend adhesive with combined properties to adhere to either skin or mucosa for drug delivery, podium abstract, 30th Annual Meeting and Exposition of the Controlled Release Society, Glasgow, Scotland, Jul. 19-23, 2003, Abstract #123.
Database WPI Section Ch, Week 198451, Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A96, AN 1984-315114 & JP 59196817 A (Sekisuki Chem Ind Co Ltd) Nov. 8, 1984 (Nov. 8, 1984) abstract.
Database WPI Section Ch, Week 199150, Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A18, AN 1991-366353 & JP 03247334 A (Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd) Nov. 5, 1991 (Nov. 5, 1991) abstract.
Database WPI Section Ch, Week 199118, Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A96, AN 1991-128478 & JP 03066612 A (Sato Pharm Co Ltd) Mar. 22, 1991 (Mar. 22, 1991) abstract.
Database WPI Section Ch, Week 199627, Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A14, AN 1996-266746 & SU 1459215 A ( A Med Cardiology Res Centre) Nov. 20, 1995 (Nov. 20, 1995) abstract.
Feldstein et al., “A structure-property relationship and quantitative approach to the development of universal transdermal drug delivery system,” NBC Risks, vol. 25, pp. 441-458, (1999).
Feldstein et al., “Coherence of thermal transitions in poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)-poly(ethylene glycol) compatible blends: 1. Interrelations among the temperatures of melting, maximum cold crystalization rate and glass transition”, Polymer, vol. 41, pp. 5327-5338, (2000).
Feldstein et al., “Coherence of thermal transitions in poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)-poly(ethylene glycol) compatible blends: 2. The temperature of maximum cold crystalization rate versus glass transition”, Polymer, vol. 41, pp. 5339-5348, (2000).
Feldstein et al., “Coherence of thermal transitions in poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)-poly(ethylene glycol) compatible blends: 3. Impact of sorbed water upon phase behavior”, Polymer, vol. 41, pp. 5349-5359, (2000).
Feldstein et al., “Correlations between activation energy for debonding and that for self-diffusion in pressure-sensitive hydrogels”, Proceed. 24th Annual Meeting Adhession Soc., pp. 137-140, (2001).
Feldstein et al., “Contribution of molecular mobility to debonding of pressure-sensitive adhesive hydrogels”, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 81, pp. 467-468, (1999).
Feldstein et al., “Effect of hydrophilic matrix hydration on transdermal drug delivery kinetics: I. The matrix hydration In Vivo and In Vitro”, Prediction of Percutaneous Penetration, vol. 4b, pp. 61-64, Brian, et al., (Eds.) (1996).
Feldstein et al., “Effect of hydrophilic matrix hydration on transdermal drug delivery kinetics: II. In Vitro cytasine Delivery From Cypercuten TTS”, Prediction of Percutaneous Penetration, vol. 4b, pp. 65-67, Brian, et al., (Eds.) (1996).
Feldstein et al., “Effect of hydrophilic matrix hydration on transdermal drug delivery kinetics: III. In Vitro clonide delivery from clopercuten TTS”, Prediction of Percutaneous Penetration, vol. 4b, pp. 68-70, Brian, et al., (Eds.) (1996).
Feldstein et al., “Effect of hydrophilic matrix hydration on transdermal drug delivery kinetics: IV. In Vitro-In Vivo correlation,” Prediction of Percutaneous Penetration, vol. 4b, pp. 71-73, Brian, et al., (eds.) (1996).
Feldstein et al., “Effects of chains orientation, free volume and interaction on glass transition in poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)-poly(ethylene glycol) blends involving a stoichiometric hydrogen-B bonded network complex”, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 82, pp. 365-366, (2000).
Feldstein et al., “General approach to the molecular design of hydrophilic pressure-sensitive adhesives,” Proc. 25th Ann. Mtg. and 2nd World Congress on Adhesion and Related Phenomena, Orlando, FL, vol. 1, pp. 292-294 (2002).
Feldstein et al., “Molecular insight into rheological and diffusion determinants of pressure sensitive adhesion”, Proceed. 23rd Annual Meeting Adhesion Soc., pp. 54-56, (2000).
Feldstein et al., “Peculiarities of glass transition temperature relation to the composition of poly(N-vinyl pyrolidone) blends with short chain poly(ethylene glycol)”, Polymer, vol. 42, pp. 7719-7726, (2001).
Feldstein et al., “Quantitative relationship between molecular structure and adhesion of PVP-PEG hydrogels”, Polym. Mater. Sci Eng., vol. 81, pp. 465-466, (1999).
Feldstein et al., “Relation of glass transition temperature to the hydrogen bonding degree and energy in poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone) blends with hydroxyl-containing plasticizers: 2. Effects of poly(ethylene glycol) chain length”, Polymer, vol. 42, pp. 981-990, (2001).
Feldstein et al., “Universal hydrophilic drug-containing adhesive matrix for systemic and topical transdermal drug delivery”, Proc. 1st World Meeting APGI/APV. Budapest. 9/11. 2 pages, (1995).
Feldstein et al., “A new class of pressure-sensitive adhesives based on interpolymer and polymer-oligomer complexes”, Polymer Science, vol. 51, No. 7, pp. 799-814 (2009).
Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, Arther H. Kibbe, ed., 3rd ed., pp. 401-406, (2000).
Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 14th Edition, Citation, “Oligomer, A polymer molecule of only a few monomer units (dimer, trimer, tetramer)”, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., (2002).
International Search Report for PCT/US2000/18557 mailed Oct. 17, 2000.
International Search Report for PCT/US2001/21417 mailed Feb. 25, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/US2002/13680 mailed Sep. 18, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/US2002/14260 Mailed Sep. 17, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/US2002/14725 mailed Sep. 27, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/US2003/16408 Mailed Dec. 8, 2003.
International Search Report for PCT/US2003/039717 Mailed Jun. 28, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT/US2004/003443 Mailed Aug. 20, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT/US2004/011567 Mailed Jan. 10, 2006.
International Search Report for PCT/US2004/015448 Mailed Dec. 28, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT/US2004/029620 Mailed Jun. 1, 2005.
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/0002873 Mailed Apr. 27, 2005.
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/0034439 Mailed Jul. 19, 2006.
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/0046577 Mailed Jul. 26, 2006.
International Search Report for PCT/US/2005/028063 Mailed Apr. 28, 2006.
International Search Report for PCT/US/2005/032525 Mailed Mar. 17, 2006.
International Search Report for PCT/US/2006/000098 Mailed Nov. 3, 2006.
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/0003091 Mailed Oct. 11, 2006.
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/018500 Mailed Sep. 21, 2006.
Kotomin et al., “Squeeze-recoil analysis of adhesive hydrogels and elastomers”, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 81, pp. 425-426, (1999).
Kotomin et al., “Durability and fracture of some visceolastic adhesives,” Proceed. of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Adhesion Soc., pp. 413-415, (Feb. 20-23, 2000).
MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet), Lactic Acid, No. L0522, (2008).
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 017, No. 055 (C-I023) Feb. 3, 1993 (Feb. 3, 1993) & JP 04 266818 A (Sekisui Chem Co Ltd), Sep. 22, 1992 (Sep. 22, 1992) abstract.
Roos et al., “Probe tack investigation of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)-poly(ethylene glycol) blends”, Proceed. 24th Annual Meeting Adhesion Soc., pp. 277-279, (2001).
Schehlmann “Polyvinylcaprolactam: physical and cosmetic properties of a new hair fixative resin”, Lecture held at the IN-COSMETICS, SOFW-Journal-Sounderdruck, Dusseldorf, 6 pages (1997).
Sintov et al., “Radiofrequency-driven skin microchanneling as a new way for electically assisted transdermal delivery of hydrophilic drugs”, J. Contr.Release, vol. 89, pp. 311-320, (2003).
Supplementary European Search Report for EP04783729.9 Mailed Jun. 5, 2009.
Vartapian et al., “Self-diffusion in poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)-poly(ethylene glycol) systems”, Colloid Polym. Sci., vol. 279, pp. 532-538, (2001).
Vartapian et al., “Molecular dynamics in poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)-poly(ethylene glycol) blends by pulsed-field gradient NMR method: effects of aging, hydration and PEG chain length”, Macromol. Chem. Phys., vol. 202, pp. 2648-2652, (2001).
Whelan Polymer Technology Dictionary, Citation Butyl Rubber, Chapman Hall, 2-6 Boundry Row, London, UK, vol. 1, pp. 53 (1994).
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/056118 Mailed Feb. 11, 2015.
Hurkmans et al., “Skin irritation caused by transdermal drug delivery systems during long-term (5 days) application”, Br. J. Dermatology, vol. 112, No. 4, pp. 461-467 (1985).
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/000081 Mailed Sep. 7, 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140322284 A1 Oct 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61144728 Jan 2009 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12687586 Jan 2010 US
Child 14323958 US