This patent application is a U.S. National Phase application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/GB2008/050305, filed on Apr. 28, 2008, entitled TRANSDUCER, which claims priority to Great Britain patent application number 0708981.6, filed May 10, 2007, and Great Britain patent application number 0713942.1, filed Jul. 18, 2007.
The present invention relates to a transducer for use in an inductive position sensor. The invention has particular relevance to transducers for linear and rotary position sensor systems which are applicable to machines, robotics, front panel controls and instrumentation, and other applications where such position measurements are required.
Various electromagnetic transducers have been proposed for use in sensing position. A traditional approach is the use of optical encoders. However these devices are expensive and prone to dirt contamination unless housed, at added cost. More recently Hall-effect based sensors have become available, dedicated to the task of absolute position sensing. These are exemplified by Austria Microsystems' AS5030 integrated circuit, which measures the angular position of a magnet positioned above. However these sensors are relatively sensitive to DC magnetic fields present in their operating environment, for example due to their proximity to motors and/or the presence of magnets. They are also sensitive to misalignment of the magnet's rotation axis relative to their own central axis, which can cause errors in their reported position. Such misalignment arises through tolerances at manufacture. It is possible to calibrate out the resulting errors, but the resulting calibration time is costly. It is possible to mechanically trim out the misalignment, but the trimming step is costly. It is possible to tighten the tolerances, but this usually results in the need for more expensive components.
Inductive sensors such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,128 (the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference) overcome the problem of DC magnetic field sensitivity by operating with AC fields. Many of these known inductive sensors use excitation and sensor coils that are inductively coupled, in use, to a resonator coil. To keep manufacturing costs down, the coils, including the resonator coil, are manufactured from conductive tracks mounted on printed circuit boards. This can result in relatively low Q factor and hence poor signal levels and hence poor signal to noise for a given drive power.
The present invention aims to provide an alternative transducer design that can be used in an electromagnetic position sensor.
According to one aspect, the present invention provides a transducer for use in a position sensor, the transducer comprising: a magnetic field concentrating member; a first coil operable, in use, to couple with a first portion of the magnetic field concentrating member positioned adjacent the first coil; a second coil operable, in use, to couple with a second portion of the magnetic field concentrating member positioned adjacent the second coil, the second portion being spaced along the magnetic field concentrating member from the first portion; and a resonator having a coil wound around a portion of said magnetic field concentrating member which is located between said first and second portions; wherein, during use, the electromagnetic coupling between the resonator coil and at least one of the first and second coils varies as a function of the relative position between the resonator and that coil. In this way, separate processing electronics can process the signals obtained from the transducer to determine the desired position information.
The electromagnetic coupling between the resonator and both the first and second coils varies as a function of the relative position between the resonator and those coils.
A third coil may be provided for coupling with a third portion of the elongate magnetic field concentrating member positioned adjacent the third coil, the first portion being positioned between said second and third portions. In this case, the second and third coils can be connected in series, preferably so that signals induced in the second coil by a background magnetic field oppose the signals induced in the third coil by the same background magnetic field.
The arrangement of the resonator and the coils is preferably such that, during use, an electromagnetic field generated by the resonator couples with a first polarity with the second coil and couples with a second, opposite, polarity with the third coil.
In one embodiment, the field concentrating member is rotatable about an axis which passes through or near said first portion and the resonator coil is mounted asymmetrically on the field concentrating member. In this case, the second and third coils can be symmetrically arranged about an axis which is substantially coaxial with the rotational axis of the field concentrating member.
In a preferred embodiment, the first and second coils are substantially planar and the magnetic field concentrating member is oriented so that a longitudinal axis of the magnetic field concentrating member lies in a plane that is substantially parallel with said planar coils. The planar coils can be formed, for example, from conductor tracks on a printed circuit board or from conductive inks on a substrate.
Another aspect provides a rotational position sensor comprising a resonant element mounted for relative rotational motion about an axis of rotation and which is operable to generate substantially equal and opposite magnetic fields on opposing sides of said axis of rotation in response to a substantially rotationally symmetric excitation magnetic field.
The resonant element may be formed from an inductor and capacitor or from a mechanical type resonator such as a magnetostrictive element. If formed from an inductor and capacitor, the inductor may include a coil wound onto a permeable member, such as a ferrite rod. In one embodiment, the coil is asymmetrically positioned on the ferrite rod relative to the rotation axis of the resonant element.
If required, the permeable member may be tilted relative to substantially planar sensor coils to ensure that the field magnitudes are equalised on opposing sides of the rotational axis.
This aspect also provides a system for inductively measuring the angular position of the above resonant element. The system may include one or more patterned sensor coils for the detection of resonator angle. The patterning of the sensor coils may be arranged to generate a substantially sinusoidally varying amplitude with angle in response to resonator rotation.
The system may include a processor for combining coupling information from multiple sensor coils to deliver a position indication substantially immune to misalignment of the resonator and sensor coils.
The system may include a substantially rotationally symmetric coil for powering the resonator. Alternatively, the resonator may be powered from the patterned coils.
These and various other aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of exemplary embodiment described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
a schematically illustrates a SIN sensor winding used in the position sensor shown in
b schematically illustrates a COS sensor winding and an excitation winding used in the position sensor shown in
a schematically illustrates an error in reported position caused by an offset between a resonator and the excitation and sensor windings;
b schematically illustrates how the offset shown in
a to 6d illustrate the conductive tracks formed on the four layers of the sensor board which form the COS sensor winding;
a to 7d illustrate the conductive tracks formed on the four layers of the sensor board which form part of the excitation winding;
a to 8d illustrate all of the conductive tracks on the four layers of the sensor printed circuit board;
Overview
One embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The resonator 1 is powered by an excitation coil 11 integrated onto the sensor board 9. This excitation coil 11 generates an approximately uniform and rotationally symmetric field concentrated near the centre of the resonator's ferrite rod 4. The excitation field is concentrated by the ferrite rod 4. The asymmetric placement of the resonator coil 3 on the ferrite rod 4 means that it couples with the resulting concentrated field. The coupling factor is largely immune to the rotational angle of the resonator 1, due to the radially symmetric nature of the excitation field. The resonator 1 is therefore forced to resonate at all angular positions Az, and with a phase relationship to the excitation field which is largely independent of that angle.
Once powered to resonance by the excitation field, the resonator 1 generates its own AC magnetic fields in response. This field passes along the ferrite rod 4, such that the field at the end of the rod furthest from the coil 3 (“long end”) is approximately equal and opposite to the field at the end closest to the coil 3 (“short end”). This resonator field couples into sensor coils 13 located adjacent the ends of the ferrite rod 4. In this embodiment, the sensor coils 13 are patterned so that the coupling of this resonator field with the sensor coils 13 varies with the angular position of the resonator 1 relative to the sensor coils 13.
This resonator 1 can be used in conjunction with a wide range of sensor coil 13 geometries. The fact that the fields from its two ends have opposite polarity mean that there is no rotational symmetry so that it is possible for sensing electronics to determine the resonator's angular position unambiguously over 360°. The fact that these fields are approximately equal in strength and opposite in polarity means that the sensor can be highly immune to misalignments between the resonator 1 and the sensor circuit board 9, provided that the sensor coils 13 used have equal and opposite sensitivity to the individual misalignment of field from the long and short ends of the ferrite rod 4.
One possible sensor coil geometry is illustrated in
The SIN coil 13-1 is shown separately for clarity, but its centre actually coincides with the centres of the COS coil 13-2 and the excitation coil 11. For clarity the number of turns in each coil has been simplified: the number of turns in each coil is larger in the actual pattern, and cross connections are less pronounced.
Operation
The operation of the sensor will now be described with reference to
When the resonator 1 is aligned at 0° so that its short end 16 is centered on C+ (the positive set of loops of the COS coil 13-2 illustrated in
The situation is reversed at −180° (which is identical to +180° in this case). Here the short end 16 of the resonator 1 and the C+ set of loops of the COS coil 13-2 coincide, and the long end 18 and the C− set of loops of the COS coil 13-2 coincide. kCOS is therefore now a large negative value. kSIN remains zero.
At 90° the short end 16 of the resonator 1 coincides with the S+ set of loops and the long end 18 with the S− set of loops. kSIN is therefore a large positive value, and KCOS is zero.
The graph in
Misalignment Immunity
We will now consider the effect of a misalignment (Mx) in the x-direction and (My) in the y-direction for the resonator 1 shown in
The reason for this will now be explained. A processing circuit (not shown) connected to the sensor coils 13 determines position from the relative amplitude of the signals (Acos and Asin) detected in the COS and SIN sensor coils 13 respectively:
Az_estimate=a tan 2(A cos, A sin)
The signals induced in the sensor coils 13 will be AC signals at the excitation frequency. The processing circuit will therefore process these signals to determine their relative amplitudes so that they can be used in the above 4 quadrant arctangent calculation.
If we now consider the detected signals as being obtained by two components—one for the field due to the long end of the resonator 1 and one due to the field from the short end of the resonator 1, then:
Az_estimate=a tan 2(A cos_short+A cos_long, A sin_short+A sin_long)
Provided the magnitude of the vector rm is small (ie the misalignments in the x and y directions are small) enough that detected signals from the short and long ends of the resonator 1 remain approximately the same, then this can be approximated by:
Az_estimate=0.5×[a tan 2(A cos_short, A sin_short)+a tan 2(A cos_long, A sin_long)]
Denoting:
Az_estimate_short=a tan 2(A cos_short, A sin_short)
Az_estimate_long=a tan 2(A cos_long, A sin_long)
which are the effective angular positions of the resonator's short and long ends (which the system can not individually detect since the underlying signals are summed together by virtue of the series connection of the sets of loops 15 forming the sensing coils 13), then we can then write:
Az_estimate=0.5×[Az_estimate_short+Az_estimate_long]
Thus the system's reported position is the average of the effective angular position of the resonator's short and long ends. By symmetry, if misalignments Mx and My cause an angular error of Az_error_short in Az_estimate_short, then an equal and opposite angular error Az_error_long=−Az_error_short will be caused in Az_estimate_long. The net effect on the value of Az_estimate reported by the system will therefore be zero, yielding a system that is largely immune to misalignments.
Sensor Board Design
In this embodiment, the sensor coils 13 and the excitation coil 11 are formed from conductor tracks formed on a four layer printed circuit board 9.
a illustrates a portion of the COS coil 13-2 described above, implemented on layer 1 of the 4 layer PCB 9.
The two small traces illustrated in
Each main sensing set of loops of the COS coil 13-2 comprises a set of turns on layer 1 (here illustrated in
The two sets of loops are connected by only a few vias. The use of such a small number of vias means that a maximum amount of space can be afforded to conductor traces, and hence a maximum number of turns. This is especially important in the design presented here, since it is implemented on four layers. Each via therefore occupies space not only on the layers it is connecting, but also on the layers occupied by other traces to which appropriate clearance is required.
The SIN coil 13-1 is almost identical to the COS coil 13-2, only rotated through 90° and implemented mainly on layers 2 and 3.
As shown, the SIN and COS coils 13 are largely implemented on different layers of the PCB 9. The problem of different sensing amplitudes is solved by having the SIN and COS coils 13 each implemented on multiple layers, such that their mean depth within the PCB stack-up is nominally identical.
The excitation coil 11 is concentrated towards the centre of the board 9.
The design presented here yields an excitation coil 11 whose diameter is maximised without clashing with SIN and COS coils 13, to further increase efficiency and hence output EMF. This is made possible by eliminating vias positioned between the sensor coils 13 and the excitation coil 11. Vias used for connecting different sections of the excitation coil 11 are instead positioned within the turns of and between the SIN and COS coils 13, where there is plenty of space, or inside the excitation coil 11, where additional excitation turns have less effect on efficiency.
The excitation coil 11 can be seen to have substantial symmetry. In particular, its field patterns are highly symmetric under rotations of 90° and 180°, which means that coupling between the excitation coil and SIN and COS coils 13 is minimised. This reduction in stray coupling yields high accuracy, especially when the sensor is operated with excitation current applied continuously.
Modifications and Alternatives
The one period sensor windings 13 illustrated in
As noted above such a 3-period sensor does not detect angular position unambiguously over 360°. To do this, the sensor coils of
This approach can be deployed with other sensor coil combinations. For example the data from three period and seven period sensor coils can be combined in the same way to yield data which is accurate and unambiguous over 360°.
The description above is for sensors having two phase (SIN,COS) sinusoidal sensors. The use of a two phase system is not necessary; the invention works with three or more phases.
The description above is for sensor coils that are balanced, ie where each coil comprises individual coil segments which are wound in opposite senses. This is not a necessary requirement, as illustrated by the sensor in
Az_estimate=a tan 2[Aa−(Aa+Ab+Ac)/3, (Ab−Ac)/sqrt(3)]
Similarly, sensors having a different number of arrayed coils may be used, in conjunction with interpolation routines appropriate to the sensor and resonator geometry.
We noted above that a sensor coil patterned to generate an odd number of sinusoidal repeats over a circle has equal and opposite sensitivities to fields generated at points on opposing sides of its axis, and therefore couples with the resonator of
We described above an excitation coil 11 that is wound within the inner portions of sensor coils 13. The excitation coil may instead overlap sensor coils as illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,128, or it may be wound around the sensor's outer portion, or a combination of such positions. The excitation coil 11 may be wound in different senses. For example it may be implemented in two parts, one wound clockwise within the sensor coils and one anticlockwise outside. By appropriately selecting the number of turns in each portion, the fields from the two portions may cancel at some distance and beyond, to minimise emissions that may otherwise cause interference.
We described sensor boards 9 built from conductors printed on circuit boards (PCBs) above. They may instead be built from appropriately patterned windings of wire. They may also optionally be wound onto formers, which may optionally be magnetically permeable formers to concentrate the field to improve signal levels and/or accuracy.
We described a resonator 1 above, having a single offset winding 3 (which may optionally be tilted), to create equal and opposite fields at its two ends in response to an excitation field that is substantially uniform under rotation. This can also be achieved with the resonator of
The ferrite rod 4 of
The resonators described above were designed to couple with an excitation field applied near their centres, and to generate equal and opposite fields at their ends in order to couple with sensor coils. These positions can be modified. For example the resonator of
We described magnetically coupled resonators above which were implemented with a wound coil in parallel with a capacitor, where energy is exchanged between magnetic (current in a coil) and electrostatic (electric field across capacitor plates) forms. The magnetically coupled resonance may be achieved in different ways. For example, a strip 67 of appropriately biased magnetostrictive material may be mounted to permit mechanical oscillation 68 as illustrated in
The resonators described above may be used in conjunction with shielding material on the side opposite to the sensor, to minimise field distortion and interference from objects behind. This shielding may be built from magnetically permeable material and/or from conductive material.
The systems described above sensed position by powering a resonator with an approximately uniform field and detecting the response in two or more patterned sensor coils. However what is fundamental is the measurement of the relative coupling factors from the resonator to the patterned sensor coils. These coupling factors may also be derived from a measurement in the “reverse” direction. In this case current is passed through the patterned coils (eg coils 13 shown in
In the previous embodiments, the resonator has been mounted for rotation relative to the sensor and excitation windings. The invention is also applicable to linear embodiments, such as the one illustrated in
The operation of this embodiment is similar to the previous embodiments. In particular, when excitation current is applied to the excitation winding 11′, excitation magnetic field couples into the lower end 73 of the ferrite core 4, which in turn causes the resonator 1′ to resonate. The magnetic field generated by the resonator 1 will emerge from the lower end 73 of the resonator and “flows” to the upper end 18, thereby coupling with the SIN and COS sensor windings 13′. FIG. 14 also illustrates the way in which the amplitudes of the signals induced in the sensor windings 13′ vary with the position of the resonator 1′ along the x-axis. As before, the amplitudes vary approximately sinusoidally with position.
In an alternative linear embodiment, a second set of sensor windings may be arranged below the excitation winding 11′. In this case, the resonator coil 3 would remain in its current position, but the ferrite rod 4 would be extended so that the lower end 73 was positioned over the second set of sensor windings. The signals from the two sets of sensor windings can then be combined and processed to determine the desired position information. For example, if the additional set of sensor windings are exact copies of the windings illustrated in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0708981.6 | May 2007 | GB | national |
0713942.1 | Jul 2007 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2008/050305 | 4/28/2008 | WO | 00 | 10/19/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/139216 | 11/20/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2145742 | Wechsung | Jan 1939 | A |
2867783 | Childs | Jan 1959 | A |
2942212 | Mynall | Jun 1960 | A |
3219956 | Newell et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3297940 | Mulligan et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3482242 | Hargrove | Dec 1969 | A |
3579023 | Fox | May 1971 | A |
3647963 | Bailey | Mar 1972 | A |
3772587 | Farrand et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3812481 | Stedtnitz | May 1974 | A |
3851242 | Ellis | Nov 1974 | A |
3873770 | Ioannou | Mar 1975 | A |
3895356 | Kraus | Jul 1975 | A |
3898635 | Kulterman | Aug 1975 | A |
3906436 | Kurauchi et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3925610 | French et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3962663 | Visser | Jun 1976 | A |
4005396 | Fujiwara et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4014015 | Gundlach | Mar 1977 | A |
4065850 | Burr et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4081603 | Davis et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4092852 | Fowler et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4094572 | Burr et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4097684 | Burr | Jun 1978 | A |
4150352 | Pomella et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4156192 | Schedrovitsky et al. | May 1979 | A |
4205199 | Mochizuki | May 1980 | A |
4210775 | Rodgers et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4223300 | Wiklund | Sep 1980 | A |
4255617 | Carau, Sr. et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4341385 | Doyle et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4358723 | Scholl et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4387509 | Dechelette | Jun 1983 | A |
4423286 | Bergeron | Dec 1983 | A |
4425511 | Brosh | Jan 1984 | A |
4482784 | Whetstone | Nov 1984 | A |
4504832 | Conte | Mar 1985 | A |
4507638 | Brosh | Mar 1985 | A |
4532376 | Rockwell | Jul 1985 | A |
4577057 | Blesser | Mar 1986 | A |
4577058 | Collins | Mar 1986 | A |
4593245 | Viertl et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4609776 | Murakami et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4642321 | Schoenberg et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4672154 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686501 | Palmier et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4693778 | Swiggett et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697050 | Farel et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697144 | Howbrook | Sep 1987 | A |
4697244 | Murakami et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4704501 | Taguchi et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4709209 | Murakami et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4711026 | Swiggett et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4711977 | Miyamori et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4723446 | Saito et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4734546 | Landmeier | Mar 1988 | A |
4737698 | McMullin et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4748295 | Rogers | May 1988 | A |
4752655 | Tajiri et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4786765 | Yamanami et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4820961 | McMullin | Apr 1989 | A |
4821002 | Luly | Apr 1989 | A |
4848496 | Murakami et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4868443 | Rossi | Sep 1989 | A |
4878553 | Yamanami et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4891590 | Hammel et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4893077 | Auchterlonie | Jan 1990 | A |
4902858 | Yamanami et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4963703 | Phillips et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4975546 | Craig | Dec 1990 | A |
4985691 | Pulyer et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4988837 | Murakami et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4999461 | Murakami et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5004872 | Lasley | Apr 1991 | A |
5013047 | Schwab | May 1991 | A |
5023408 | Murakami et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5028745 | Yamanami et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041785 | Bogaerts et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5045645 | Hoendervoogt et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5059180 | McLees | Oct 1991 | A |
5066833 | Zalenski | Nov 1991 | A |
5082286 | Ryan et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5088928 | Chan | Feb 1992 | A |
5122623 | Zank et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129654 | Bogner | Jul 1992 | A |
5134388 | Murakami et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134689 | Murakami et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5136125 | Russell | Aug 1992 | A |
5177389 | Schalk | Jan 1993 | A |
5188368 | Ryan | Feb 1993 | A |
5206785 | Hukashima | Apr 1993 | A |
5218174 | Gray et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5225637 | Rodgers et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239489 | Russell | Aug 1993 | A |
5245336 | Chen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5247137 | Epperson | Sep 1993 | A |
5247138 | Landmeier | Sep 1993 | A |
5274198 | Landmeier | Dec 1993 | A |
5342136 | Fukami | Aug 1994 | A |
5349139 | Verrier et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5357062 | Rockwell et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5369227 | Stone | Nov 1994 | A |
5381091 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5396443 | Mese et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5406155 | Persson | Apr 1995 | A |
5434372 | Lin | Jul 1995 | A |
5461204 | Makinwa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5486731 | Masaki et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5525981 | Abernethy | Jun 1996 | A |
5554827 | Oda | Sep 1996 | A |
5557076 | Wieczorek et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5571997 | Gray et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5600105 | Fukuzaki et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619431 | Oda | Apr 1997 | A |
5625239 | Persson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5635683 | McDermott et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646496 | Woodland et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657011 | Komatsu et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5691513 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691748 | Fukuzaki | Nov 1997 | A |
5693913 | Sudo et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5693993 | Ito et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5748110 | Sekizawa et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751229 | Funahashi | May 1998 | A |
5764052 | Renger | Jun 1998 | A |
5783940 | Kolomeitsev | Jul 1998 | A |
5815091 | Dames et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818091 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818431 | Oh et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826473 | Saka et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831431 | Gottfried-Gottfried et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854449 | Adkins | Dec 1998 | A |
5864098 | Shinohe | Jan 1999 | A |
5866847 | Saka et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5895895 | Ono et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5914735 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5939878 | Dong | Aug 1999 | A |
5943044 | Martinelli et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6002387 | Ronkka et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005555 | Katsurahira et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6054851 | Masreliez et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6124708 | Dames | Sep 2000 | A |
6131457 | Sato | Oct 2000 | A |
6236199 | Irle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239789 | Sekizawa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249135 | Maruyama et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249234 | Ely et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249235 | Iwasaki | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255810 | Irle et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262684 | Stewart et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271744 | McCarthy | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288710 | Lee et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291907 | Haigh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304014 | England et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304076 | Madni et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310473 | Zhao | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6393912 | Pchelnikov et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6489899 | Ely et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513943 | Fukuyoshi | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522128 | Ely et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534970 | Ely et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6650106 | Daalmans et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6667740 | Ely et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6705511 | Dames et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713981 | Nakajima | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6788221 | Ely et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797895 | Lapstun et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798404 | Sharma | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6888538 | Ely et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6909281 | Gassman et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6969987 | Schwartzbart | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6977594 | Hudman et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980134 | Ely et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7005847 | Gassman et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7019672 | Ely | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7219547 | Suzuki | May 2007 | B2 |
7301333 | Kuwahara | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305882 | May | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7511705 | Silk et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
8058865 | May | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010001430 | Ely et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010006369 | Ely | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010045858 | Alhoussami | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052823 | Hirano et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020163331 | Sekiya et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179339 | Ely et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006760 | Valles | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030062889 | Ely et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040035221 | May | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040169594 | Ely et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040232913 | Schott et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233178 | Silk et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050021269 | Ely et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050171714 | Ely et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050174259 | Ely | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060244464 | Kreit | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090102463 | May | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090237073 | Uchiyama et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100301840 | Filatov | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110043196 | Fujita et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110109304 | Suzuki et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20130113467 | Sasada | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 134 848 | Aug 1962 | DE |
35 00 121 | Jul 1986 | DE |
36 20 412 | Dec 1987 | DE |
0 159 191 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 182 085 | May 1986 | EP |
0 182 085 | May 1986 | EP |
0 209 513 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0 218 745 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0 307 667 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0 313 046 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0 499 641 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0 511 406 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 537 458 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 552 001 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0 554 900 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 607 694 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0 657 917 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 672 997 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 675 581 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0 680 009 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 709 648 | May 1996 | EP |
0 716 390 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 743 508 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0 772 149 | May 1997 | EP |
0 915 429 | May 1999 | EP |
1 325 017 | Apr 1963 | FR |
2 298 082 | Aug 1976 | FR |
2 682 760 | Apr 1993 | FR |
851 543 | Oct 1960 | GB |
1 122 763 | Aug 1968 | GB |
1 452 132 | Oct 1976 | GB |
2 012 431 | Jul 1979 | GB |
2 021 273 | Nov 1979 | GB |
2 042 183 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2 059 593 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2 064 125 | Jun 1981 | GB |
2 074 736 | Nov 1981 | GB |
1 604 824 | Dec 1981 | GB |
2 103 943 | Mar 1983 | GB |
2 141 235 | Dec 1984 | GB |
2231161 | Nov 1990 | GB |
60-165512 | Aug 1985 | JP |
60-189231 | Sep 1985 | JP |
63-211014 | Sep 1988 | JP |
02-248816 | Oct 1990 | JP |
02-275314 | Nov 1990 | JP |
60-51905 | Feb 1994 | JP |
287267 | Oct 1996 | TW |
347542 | Dec 1998 | TW |
WO 9212401 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO 9425829 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9425829 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9531696 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9603188 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO 9714935 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9800921 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9854545 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9858237 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9919691 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9934171 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9961868 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0033244 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Patents Act 1977: Search Report under Section 17 for GB 0416614.6, 1 pg., (Oct. 21, 2004). |
PCT International Search Report for PCT/GB2004/003639, 2 pgs., (Apr. 11, 2005). |
PCT International Search Report for PCT/GB1999/003989, 5 pgs., (Aug. 23, 2000). |
PCT International Search Report for PCT/GB2003/002432, 3 pgs., (May 11, 2004). |
PCT International Search Report for PCT/GB2002/005247, 5 pgs., (May 23, 2005). |
PCT International Search Report for PCT/GB2002/002387, 5 pgs., (Jan. 8, 2004). |
Pulle, et al., “A New Magnetoresistive Based Sensor for Switched Reluctance Drives”, Proceedings of the Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, PESC '92 Record., vol. 2, No. 23, 23rd Annual IEEE, pp. 839-843, (Jun. 29-Jul. 3, 1992). |
Gordon, “Digitial xy Position Indicator using Walsh Functions”, Electronics Letters, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 5-6, (Jan. 9, 1975). |
Patents Act 1977: Examination Report under Section 18(3) for GB 0422091.9, 4 pgs., (Jun. 1, 2005). |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Counterpart Application No. PCT/GB2008/050305 containing Communication relating to the Results of the Partial International Search Report, 13 pgs., (Feb. 12, 2009). |
D. McDonnell, “The Use of Inductosyn to Digital Converters in Linear Control Systems”, Automation, vol. 10, No. 11-12, pp. 31-32, (Nov./Dec. 1975), XP-002077774. |
Robert W. Klatt, “Phase of Digital Fixes Shaft Angle”, Electrical Design News, vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 53-56, (Jun. 15, 1971), XP002045871. |
“Physics 2CL Lab Manual” Online! 1999, retrieved from the Internet on May 11, 2005: http://hep.ucsd.edu/dbmacf/1998-1999/2cl/manual/experiment3.pdf, pp. 51-61, XP00232778. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120098527 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |