The present invention generally relates to the field of electro acoustic transducers. While the invention has applicability to a wide range of diverse applications, it will be specifically disclosed in connection with a speaker for producing air-borne sound waves.
Balanced armature electro acoustic transducers have long been fundamental components of communications equipment ranging from telephones to hearing aids. In essence, this type of speaker uses an armature positioned in an area of magnetic flux created by opposite poles of a magnet. An alternating current typically is passed through a coil positioned around the armature. This induces a fluctuating magnetic flux in the armature to change the magnetic polarity of a portion of the armature positioned between opposite poles of a magnet. The polarity of the armature depends on the direction of the AC current running through the coil, and the armature is attracted to one or the other of the magnetic poles of the magnet in an alternating sequence. This causes the armature to vibrate, and the vibrating movement of the armature is then used, either directly or indirectly, to move air and to thereby create sound waves.
A limitation to the performance of conventional balanced armature electro acoustic devices, whether used as speakers or microphones, is that their characteristic frequency spectra deviate from being perfectly flat, spectral flatness being one representation of a lack of distortion, a very desirable characteristic for acoustic (and most other) transducers. This spectral deviation or “signature” arises from the fundamental structural properties that are characteristic of all conventional balanced armature devices: the mass and springiness of the armature itself, the sound producing diaphragm and its chamber(s), and, in most conventional speaker of this type, the connector element and its attachments that link the armature and the diaphragm. Numerous techniques have been developed to minimize the disadvantages of this inherent signature, including, for example, the use of so-called “ferro-fluids” for damping the system and improving the transducer's dynamic performance.
Notwithstanding the substantial enhancements to these general types of transducers, room remains for improving and simplifying the frequency signature, minimizing the frictional and other mechanical losses, and improving the efficiency of this type of speakers. In many applications, it also is desirable to further reduce the size of the transducer. For example, when used in a hearing aid or earphone application, it is desirable to have a transducer that is small enough to comfortably fit within a human auditory canal. Similarly, when used as a component of a device such as a cell phone, the small size of the transducer allows the size of the device to be minimized.
According to one exemplary embodiment of the invention, the first (“free”) end of the armature is affixed to the vibratable sound-producing member producing thereof an integral element.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the invention, the vibratable sound-producing member is a diaphragm.
In another exemplary embodiment, different radial circumferential portions of the diaphragm have different flexibilities.
In another exemplary embodiment, the diaphragm includes a flexibility enhancing structure disposed circumferentially about the periphery of the diaphragm to enhance the flexibility of the diaphragm and reduce resistance to movement of the diaphragm in a direction substantially perpendicular to the plane of the diaphragm.
In another exemplary embodiment, the flexibility enhancing structure is a surround.
According to another exemplary embodiment, the thickness of the diaphragm in the direction substantially perpendicular to the plane of the diaphragm is variable, with at least one radially outward circumferential portion of the diaphragm having a reduced thickness relative to the thickness of the central portion of the diaphragm.
In another exemplary embodiment, different circumferential portions of the diaphragm are formed of different materials, with the material forming the radially outward circumferential portion of the diaphragm having greater flexibility that is greater than the material in the central portion of the diaphragm.
In another exemplary embodiment, the diaphragm includes a central portion and a radially outward circumferential portion with the radially outward circumferential portion having a magnetic permeability that is substantially less than the magnetic permeability of the central portion.
In another exemplary embodiment, the diaphragm includes a central portion and a radially outward circumferential portion with the radially outward circumferential portion having a lower specific mass than the central portion.
In another exemplary embodiment the armature has a non-uniform geometry configured to enhance flexibility of the armature in an area proximal to the sound-producing member.
In another exemplary embodiment, the non-uniform geometry includes a notch.
The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of the specification illustrate several aspects of the present invention, and together with the description, they serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
Reference will now be made in detail to certain exemplary embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
As best illustrated in
An electrical to magnetic coil 360 is wound around a portion 356 of the armature 350 at a position between its fixed and movable ends. Acoustic cavities 326 (see
The beam portion 356 of the armature/diaphragm 358 preferably is made of a material with a relatively high magnetic permeability, such as iron, low carbon (soft) steel, or mu-metal (e.g. Carpenter Steel Corporation “High mu 80”.) To further maximize the amount of magnetic flux that is communicated along the beam portion 356 to the diaphragm portion 357, which diaphragm portion is positioned in the gap 316, it may be desirable to maximize cross-sectional area of the beam portion 356. Further, to maximize the magnetic attraction between the diaphragm portion 357 and the opposite poles of the magnetic pole pieces 380 and 320 (see
In order to maximize the range of materials available to achieve the desired functionality, it may be desirable to form different regions of the armature/diaphragm of different materials. For example, in order to obtain the desired magnetic flux transfer along the beam 356, a permeable ferro-magnetic material such as iron, low carbon (soft) steel, or mu-metal (e.g. Carpenter Steel Corporation “High mu 80”) might be used. In order to increase the flexibility of the diaphragm, however, a more flexible material, such as Mylar might be preferable. With such a configuration, the central portion of the diaphragm might be formed of the highly permeable material, with the radially outward circumferential portion being formed of more flexible, but less permeable material such as a biaxially-oriented polyethylene terephthalate polyester film (such as the film sold under the trademark Mylar). Using this type of material on the radially outward circumferential portion of the diaphragm results in a combination in which the magnetic permeability of the radially outward circumferential portion of the diaphragm is less than the magnetic permeability of the central portion, and concentrates the magnetic forces to the central region. Variations of these mass and compliance features can, of course, be demonstrated in other than the planes shown.
In operation, the total structure of sound generating member 350 has fixed support around the outer periphery of the diaphragm 355 and at the extended region of beam armature 356. Sound is generated when the diaphragm region is caused to move under the influence of the interaction of magnetic fields described above in response to a varying electrical current in the coil, as for example an alternating current. The combined structural mechanics of the diaphragm 355, the beam armature 356 and the sound conducting fluid (not shown) all contribute to the frequency response for the structure. Altering the shape and/or thickness of the surround 354 will change the springiness of the dynamic structure of sound generating member 350, and altering the thickness and/or material of the diaphragm 355 will change the mass or the dynamic structure of sound generating member 350. Similarly, altering the shape and/or thickness of the beam armature 356 as exemplified by compliance altering feature 352 will change the springiness of the dynamic structure of sound generating member 350, and altering the thickness and/or material of the beam armature 356 itself, also will change the mass or the dynamic structure of sound generating member 350. It is noted that the change in thickness of the beam armature 356 as shown will affect its magnetic permeability in relationship to its thickness to the first power, whereas such thickness change alters the springiness to the third power of the thickness. It is well known that the overall relationship of springiness to mass affects the dynamic vibration spectrum as the square root of the ratio numerical value of the springiness to the mass of the entire structure, and preselected variations to the structures as shown serve to adjust the dynamic signature (along with other sound altering geometry in the sound path) of the acoustic transducer.
The foregoing description of preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented for purpose of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Obvious modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best illustrate the principles of the invention and its practical applications to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/395,289, filed Feb. 27, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/511,170, filed Aug. 28, 2006.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12395289 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 13585680 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11511170 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 12395289 | US |