The invention relates to transducers, actuators or exciters, in particular but not exclusively transducers for use in acoustic devices, e.g. loudspeakers and microphones.
It is known from WO 01/54450 in the name New Transducers Limited to provide an electromechanical force transducer comprising a resonant element having a frequency distribution of modes in the operative frequency range of the transducer. The parameters of the resonant element may be selected to enhance the distribution of modes in the element in the operative frequency range. The transducer may thus be considered to be an intendedly modal transducer.
The transducer may be coupled to a site to which force is to be applied by coupling means which may be attached to the resonant element at a position which is beneficial for coupling modal activity of the resonant element to the site. Thus for example as shown in
According to the present invention, there is provided an electromechanical force transducer having an intended operative frequency range and comprising a resonant element having a frequency distribution of modes in the operative frequency range, characterised by support means coupled to the periphery of the resonant element, the support means having a substantially restraining nature in relation to bending wave vibration of the resonant element.
The transducer may be for applying a force to a load, e.g. to excite an acoustic radiator to produce an acoustic output or to drive non-acoustic loads, e.g. inkjet printer heads.
Restraining the resonant element alters its boundary conditions which affects the performance of the transducer. Accordingly, the nature of the support means may be selected to achieve a desired performance of the transducer and may for example extend its bandwidth. The support means may partially or substantially simply support or clamp the resonant element. The support means may extend along at least part of and/or be coupled to at least two discrete portions of the periphery.
Simply supporting means restraining the resonant element to allow rotational but not translational movement of the resonant element about the support. The support thus acts as a hinge and has zero compliance. Clamping means constraining the resonant element to prevent both translational and rotational movement about the clamp. The velocity of the resonant element at the support or clamp is zero. In practice, it is difficult if not impossible to achieve zero velocity and thus the support means may approximate to simply supporting or clamping.
The resonant element may be rectangular and the support means may comprise portions engaging opposite edges of the resonant element. The resonant element may be generally disc-shaped and the support means may extend along part or whole of the perimeter. Alternatively, the support means may be located at least three positions on the perimeter and the positions may be equally spaced around the perimeter. The resonant element may be triangular and the support means may be located at each vertex of the triangle. The resonant element may be trapezoidal or hyperelliptical. The resonant element may be plate-like and may be planar or curved out of planar.
The support means may be vestigial, e.g. a layer of suitable adhesive. The transducer may further comprise coupling means on the resonant element for mounting the transducer to a site to which force is to be applied. The support means may be adapted to mount the transducer to the site or to a separate support, i.e. to ground the transducer. In this way, the support means may increase the ruggedness of the transducer and improve its resistant to shock and drop impacts.
The support means may be integral with the resonant element. The resonant element may be a bi-morph with a central vane and the central vane may be adapted to form the support means. Alternatively, the support means may in the form of discrete supports.
The parameters, e.g. aspect ratio, geometry and isotropy or anisotropy of bending stiffness or thickness, of the resonant element may be selected to enhance the distribution of modes in the resonant element in the operative frequency range. Analysis, e.g. computer simulation using FEA or modelling, may be used to select the parameters.
The distribution may be enhanced by ensuring a first mode of the active element is near to the lowest operating frequency of interest. The distribution may also be enhanced by ensuring a satisfactory, e.g. high, density of modes in the operative frequency range. The density of modes is preferably sufficient for the active element to provide an effective mean average force which is substantially constant with frequency. The distribution of modes may also be enhanced by distributing the resonant bending wave modes substantially evenly in frequency.
The resonant element may be modal along two substantially normal axes, each axis having an associated fundamental frequency. The ratio of the two fundamental frequencies may be adjusted for best modal distribution, e.g. 9:7 (˜1.286:1).
The resonant element may be active and may be a piezoelectric, a magnetostrictive or an electret device. The piezoelectric active element may be pre-stressed, for example as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,632,841 or may be electrically prestressed or biased. The active element may be a bi-morph, a bi-morph with a central vane or substrate or a uni-morph. The active element may be fixed to a backing plate or shim which may be a thin metal sheet and may have a similar stiffness to that of the active element.
The resonant element may be passive and may be coupled by connecting means to an active transducer element which may be a moving coil, a moving magnet, a piezoelectric, a magnetostrictive or an electret device. The connecting means may be attached to the resonant element at a position which is beneficial for enhancing modal activity in the resonant element. The passive resonant element may act as a short term resonant store and may have low natural resonant frequencies so that its modal behaviour is satisfactorily dense in the range where it performs its loading and matching action for the active element.
The transducer may comprise a plurality of resonant elements each having a distribution of modes, the modes of the resonant elements being arranged to interleave in the operative frequency range and thus enhance the distribution of modes in the transducer as a whole device. The resonant elements may be coupled together by connecting means and may be arranged in a stack with axially aligned coupling points. The resonant devices may be passive or active or combinations of passive and active devices to form a hybrid transducer.
The transducer may comprise a flat piezoelectric disc; a combination of at least two or preferably at least three flat piezoelectric discs; two coincident piezoelectric beams; a combination of multiple coincident piezoelectric beams; a curved piezoelectric plate; a combination of multiple curved piezoelectric plates or two coincident curved piezoelectric beams.
Each resonant element may have a different fundamental resonance. The interleaving of the distribution of the modes in each resonant element may be enhanced by optimising the frequency ratio of the resonant elements, i.e. the ratio of the frequencies of each fundamental resonance of each resonant element. For a transducer comprising two beams, the two beams may have a frequency ratio of 1.27:1 and for a transducer comprising three beams, the frequency ratio may be 1.315:1.147:1. For a transducer comprising two discs, the frequency ratio may be 1.1:1 to optimise high order modal density or may be 3.2:1 to optimise low order modal density. For a transducer comprising three discs, the frequency ratio may be 3.03:1.63:1 or may be 8.19:3.20:1.
The support means may be coupled to the periphery of each resonant element. Alternatively, at least one resonant element may be unrestrained, i.e. not coupled to the support means and free to move.
According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a loudspeaker comprising an acoustic radiator and a modal transducer as defined above, the transducer being coupled via coupling means to the acoustic radiator to excite the acoustic radiator to produce an acoustic output. The coupling means may be vestigial, e.g. a controlled layer of adhesive. The resonant member may be acoustically substantially inactive.
In both the first and second embodiments, the coupling means may form a line of attachment or a point or small local area of attachment where the area of attachment is small in relation to the size of the resonant element. The coupling means may comprise a combination of points and/or lines of attachment. Alternatively only a single coupling point may be provided, whereby the output of the or each resonant elements is summed through the single coupling means rather than the acoustic radiator. The coupling means may be attached to the resonant element at a position which is beneficial for coupling modal activity of the resonant element to the site or acoustic radiator.
The coupling means may be chosen to be located at an anti-node on the resonant element and may be chosen to deliver a constant average force with frequency. The coupling means may be positioned at the centre of or away from the centre of the resonant element.
The mechanical impedance of the transducer may be matched to the mechanical impedance of the load, i.e. to the acoustic radiator. The boundary conditions of the transducer may be selected to provide the required mechanical impedance of the transducer. The transducer may be mounted to a second load, e.g. a panel, which ensures impedance matching between the primary load and the transducer. The second load may be perforated to prevent acoustic radiation therefrom.
The loudspeaker may be intendedly pistonic over at least part of its operating frequency range or may be a bending wave loudspeaker. The parameters of the acoustic radiator may be selected to enhance the distribution of modes in the resonant element in the operative frequency range. The loudspeaker may be a resonant bending wave mode loudspeaker having an acoustic radiator and a transducer fixed to the acoustic radiator for exciting resonant bending wave modes. Such a loudspeaker is described in International Patent Application WO97/09842 and other patent applications and publications, and may be referred to as a distributed mode loudspeaker.
The acoustic radiator may be in the form of a panel. The panel may be flat and may be lightweight. The material of the acoustic radiator may be anisotropic or isotropic. The properties of the acoustic radiator may be chosen to distribute the resonant bending wave modes substantially evenly in frequency, i.e. to smooth peaks in the frequency response caused by “bunching” or clustering of the modes. In particular, the properties of the acoustic radiator may be chosen to distribute the lower frequency resonant bending wave modes substantially evenly in frequency.
The transducer location may be chosen to couple substantially evenly to the resonant bending wave modes in the acoustic radiator, in particular to lower frequency resonant bending wave modes. In other words, the transducer may be mounted at a location where the number of vibrationally active resonance anti-nodes in the acoustic radiator is relatively high and conversely the number of resonance nodes is relatively low.
According to a third aspect of the invention, there is a provided electronic apparatus having a body and comprising a loudspeaker as described above mounted in the body. The support means may be mounted to the body. The electronic apparatus may be in the form of a mobile phone. The support means may extend from the casing of the mobile phone. The support means may be moulded as part of the casing or fixed to the or each resonant element prior to assembly into the casing.
The operative frequency range may be over a relatively broad frequency range and may be in the audio range and/or ultrasonic range. There may also be applications for sonar and sound ranging and imaging where a wider bandwidth and/or higher possible power will be useful by virtue of distributed mode transducer operation. Thus, operation over a range greater than the range defined by a single dominant, natural resonance of the transducer may be achieved. The lowest frequency in the operative frequency range is preferably above a predetermined lower limit which is about the fundamental resonance of the transducer.
The invention is diagrammatically illustrated, by way of example, in the accompanying drawings in which:
The dotted and solid lines of
The casing 30 comprises support means in the form of four elongate finger-like supports 44a,44b, 46a,46b which extend from the casing 30 beneath part of the acoustic radiator 38. A first pair of supports 44a, 44b supports each end of the first beam 32 and a second pair of supports 46a, 46b supports each end of the second beam 34. The ends of each support are aligned with the ends of the beams. The beams are fixed, e.g. by adhesive, to the respective supports, thus providing a boundary condition which approximates a simple support for the ends of the beams.
Alternative arrangements for the end terminations of the beams are shown in
In
In
In
In
By matching the mechanical impedance of the load to the transducer, a relatively smooth variation of power, force and velocity with frequency which extends down to the 300 Hz region and below may be achieved. In contrast, if the load impedance is not matched, for example is too high or too low, there may be a 10-fold drop in power transfer. Lowering the load impedance may also introduce an extra low frequency mode, say at about 500 Hz. Simply supporting the ends increases the mechanical impedance of the transducer. For a double-beam transducer, the increase in mechanical impedance may be counteracted by removing one of the beams so that the transducer remains matched to the load impedance. In other words, a simply supported single beam transducer may have approximately the same impedance as a free double-beam transducer.
Another arrangement for achieving matching of the load impedance with that of the transducer is shown in
The central vane 82 is longer than both piezoelectric layers and its ends are curved to attach to a second load, namely a panel 94. Together the curved ends and the panel 94 form the boundary conditions for the beam. The panel is used as the admittance for the beam-ends and is selected so that the impedance of the transducer matches that of the acoustic radiator 88. The panel 94 may be perforated to effectively prevent it from radiating any sound whilst preserving its mechanical impedance.
Any loss in power which occurs when restraining the ends of the beam may be overcome by combining the transducer with a transducer having an unrestrained resonant element. For example,
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0211508.7 | May 2002 | GB | national |
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 60/381,803, filed May 21, 2002.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB03/01857 | 4/30/2003 | WO | 00 | 4/4/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/098964 | 11/27/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2045404 | Nicholides | Jun 1936 | A |
2270167 | Meissner et al. | Jan 1942 | A |
2769867 | Crownover et al. | Nov 1956 | A |
3186237 | Forrest | Jun 1965 | A |
3394275 | Lippmann | Jul 1968 | A |
3653253 | Olin | Apr 1972 | A |
4140936 | Bullock | Feb 1979 | A |
4593160 | Nakamura | Jun 1986 | A |
4705059 | Lecerf et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4814753 | Coppola | Mar 1989 | A |
5251188 | Parsons et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5552655 | Stokes et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5677487 | Hansen | Oct 1997 | A |
5705880 | Shimura et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5804906 | Tsutsumi | Sep 1998 | A |
6078674 | Cattafesta et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6259188 | Woodard et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285063 | Splett et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6674219 | Szilagyi et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
7034440 | Kim et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7116036 | Balasubramaniam et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7180225 | Sashida et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7258533 | Tanner et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7482734 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20010026625 | Azima et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010033669 | Bank et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010055403 | Bachmann et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030059069 | Bank et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040056564 | Iino et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056566 | Rubach | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040085001 | Takeshima | May 2004 | A1 |
20040195935 | Jansson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060146096 | Wright et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070086616 | Bank et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2737034 | Oct 1978 | DE |
19644161 | May 1997 | DE |
0065883 | Dec 1982 | EP |
54-38791 | Mar 1979 | JP |
57-4698 | Jan 1982 | JP |
63-016800 | Jan 1988 | JP |
10-144976 | May 1998 | JP |
11-233843 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-134697 | May 2000 | JP |
WO-9709861 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 0154450 | Jul 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050168111 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60381803 | May 2002 | US |