The present invention relates to a workpiece transfer apparatus and, more particularly, to an apparatus capable of receiving a first workpiece from a moving anvil and transferring the first workpiece to a moving second workpiece or conveyor.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,224,405 discloses a transfer roll 28 provided with a plurality of puck assemblies 54 for receiving web strips 18, 20 from a cutting assembly 4 and for rotating and transferring them to a substrate 14. Each puck assembly 54 comprises a generally rectangular, pivotable puck 74. The pucks 74 are capable of rotating with the transfer roll 28 about its axis of rotation and, further, are capable of rotating about an axis transverse to the axis of rotation of the transfer roll 28. However, the pucks 74 do not rotate about a further axis generally parallel to the axis of rotation of the transfer roll 28 during transfer of a web strip 18, 20 from a vacuum anvil roll 32 to a puck 74. Hence, a gap between a strip 18, 20, secured to the vacuum anvil roll 32, and the puck 74, during transfer of the web strip 18, 20 from the cutting assembly 4 to the puck 74, may vary substantially unless the puck 74 is generally deformable so as to deform to the shape of the anvil roll 32 during workpiece transfer. If the gap between the strip/anvil roll and the puck 74 increases substantially during workpiece transfer, improper transfer of the strip 18, 20 to the puck 74 may occur due to the vacuum from the puck 74 being insufficient at the larger gap size to pull the strip 18, 20 to the puck 74.
International Application WO 00/00419 also discloses a workpiece transfer apparatus. The apparatus comprises a rotatable drum 30 having a plurality of rotatable transfer shafts 35 positioned near the drum perimeter. Each transfer shaft 35 comprises at least one transfer head 40 for receiving material from a source A. It is noted that rotation of the transfer shafts 35 is effected using a mechanical camming arrangement. Such a mechanical control arrangement is difficult to modify to accommodate workpieces of different sizes, or vary the pitch or distance between workpieces delivered to another workpiece, e.g., a continuous web, or a conveyor.
Accordingly, there is a need for a transfer device having a workpiece gripping member mounted to a rotatable shaft which, in turn, is mounted to a rotatable drum such that the gripping member rotates with the drum, rotates about an axis parallel to the drum's axis of rotation, and, if desired, can be controlled so as to rotate about an axis transverse to the drum's axis of rotation. There is also a need for a transfer device having a workpiece gripping member mounted to a rotatable shaft which, in turn, is mounted to a rotatable drum where the rotation of the shaft and, hence, the gripping member, is effected by a drive arrangement more versatile than a mechanical camming arrangement.
These needs are met by the present invention wherein a transfer apparatus is provided comprising one or more gripping members capable of rotating about first and second substantially parallel axes and a third axis which is substantially perpendicular to the first and second axes so as to receive a first workpiece from a rotating anvil and, if desired, rotate the workpiece about the third axis prior to transferring the workpiece to a moving second workpiece such that the first workpiece is positioned at a desired angle relative to the second workpiece. “Substantially perpendicular” means that the third axis may be positioned from about 80 degrees to about 100 degrees and preferably 90 degrees relative to the first and second axes. To allow for improved control and ease in modification, the transfer apparatus comprises one or more servo drive motors. “Servo drive motor,” as used herein, means a motor controlled by a controller, processor, or computer and wherein the controller, processor, or computer receives feedback, e.g., regarding the position or velocity of the motor's output shaft, via an encoder or like device.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a transfer apparatus is provided for transferring a workpiece from a moving anvil to a moving carrier. “Carrier,” as used herein, means another workpiece, e.g., a continuous web, or a conveyor such as a conveyor belt. The apparatus comprises: a support structure comprising a support member rotatable about a first axis, and a workpiece gripping structure mounted to the support structure and comprising at least one workpiece gripping member having a workpiece-receiving surface. The gripping member is rotatable about a second axis substantially parallel to the first axis such that the gripping member is capable of being rotated about the second axis during transfer of a workpiece from the moving anvil to the workpiece-receiving surface. The workpiece gripping member may also rotate about a third axis substantially perpendicular to the first and second axes so as to be capable of rotating the workpiece from a first angular position at the anvil to a second angular position.
A transfer apparatus 10 constructed in accordance with the present invention is illustrated in
The anvil 200 may form part of a first workpiece cutting assembly 210 further comprising a rotatable knife roll 220. The anvil 200 may have a plurality of openings 202 in an outer portion thereof, which communicate with an inner vacuum chamber (not shown). A vacuum source VA is provided for drawing at least a partial vacuum in the inner chamber so as to retain pairs of the first workpieces 100 on the anvil's outer surface 204. The rotatable knife roll 220 is provided with a pair of cutting knives 222, each comprising a substantially straight cutting blade. The knives 222 function to cut pairs of the first workpieces 100 from a pair of continuous webs 100a (see
The transfer apparatus 10 comprises a support structure 20 comprising a support member 22 rotatable about a first axis A1, see
In the illustrated embodiment, the first servo drive motor 24 comprises a servo drive motor unit 24c including an integral encoder, one of which is commercially available from Reliance Electric under the product designation Model No. 1326AB-B530E. During operation, the motor/encoder unit 24c generates encoder pulses representative of the motor output shaft angular position relative to a reference point to an amplifier 24d and a main controller 30, see FIG. 3. The main controller 30, based on the encoder pulses, determines the angular position, including the number of complete revolutions, of the drive motor output shaft relative to the reference point and generates to the amplifier 24d a reference signal representative of a desired velocity for the motor at that angular position. In this case, the desired velocity will be substantially constant for all angular positions. The amplifier 24d determines the actual velocity of the motor using the encoder pulses, compares the actual velocity to the desired velocity as indicated by the reference signal from the main controller 30 and generates an appropriate drive (current) signal to the motor/encoder unit 24c, causing the motor of the unit 24c to effect rotation of the support member 22 at a predetermined, substantially constant angular velocity.
The transfer apparatus further comprises first, second, third and fourth workpiece gripping structures 40a-40d mounted to the support member 22, see
The first gripping structure 40a comprises a rotatable frame 42 (also referred to herein as a “support element”) mounted in bearings 50a and 50b which, in turn, are mounted to the first and second support member end plates 28a and 28b, see FIG. 3C. Hence, the first gripping structure 40a rotates with the support member 22 and, further, is capable of rotating about a second axis A2 relative to the support member 22, see also FIG. 3. Mounted to the rotatable frame 42 for movement with the frame 42 are first and second workpiece gripping members 44a and 44b. It is also contemplated that one or more than two workpiece gripping members may be mounted to the frame 42. Each workpiece gripping member 44a and 44b comprises a main body 140 having an outer plate 142 provided with a plurality of openings 142a extending completely through the plate 142. A substantially planar outer surface 142b of the outer plate 142 defines a substantially planar workpiece-receiving surface 142c of the workpiece gripping member 44a, 44b. The workpiece-receiving surface 142c has a length LHA extending along its longitudinal axis LWRS, see
It is contemplated that a single vacuum source (not shown) may alternatively be mounted so as not to rotate with the support member 22 and, further, may comprise a conventional centrifugal vacuum pump having a rotating impeller.
As will be described in more detail below, the workpiece gripping members 44a and 44b may be rotated about spaced-apart third axes A3a and A3b, see
The first and second gripping members 44a and 44b are adjustably coupled to the rotatable frame 42 by bolts (not shown) or the like so as to permit the gripping members 44a and 44b to be repositioned on the frame 42, i.e., the members 44a and 44b may be moved closer together or spaced further apart from one another along the frame 42.
In the illustrated embodiment, the vacuum source 146 comprises a conventional venturi vacuum pump 146a, one of which is commercially available from Anver Corporation under the product designation Model No. FT050. It is noted that a non-rotating first high pressure air line 148a is coupled to a high pressure air source PH and to a conventional first slip ring 150, see
The gripping structure 40a further comprises a second servo drive motor 44, coupled to the second support plate 28b via conventional mounting structure 244a for rotation with the support member 22. The second servo drive motor 44 effects rotation of the frame 42 and the gripping members 44a and 44b about the second axis A2. Further provided are a pair of third servo drive motors 46a and 46b mounted to the rotatable frame 42 and coupled respectively to the first and second gripping members 44a and 44b to effect rotation of the gripping members 44a and 44b about spaced-apart third axes A3a and A3b. The pair of third servo drive motors 46a and 46b rotate with the frame 42.
As a first workpiece 100 is received by a workpiece-receiving surface 142c, a plurality of points on the first workpiece 100, extending along a line substantially perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the anvil 200, make sequential contact with the workpiece-receiving surface 142c one point at a time on a continuous basis until transfer to the workpiece-receiving surface 142c is completed. Movement of the workpiece points along the workpiece-receiving surface 142c is considered equivalent to a single first transfer point moving along the surface 142c during workpiece transfer. The velocity at which the workpiece points move along, i.e., the velocity at which the first transfer point moves along, the workpiece-receiving surface 142c is referred to as “a first transfer point velocity.”
As a first workpiece 100 is removed from the anvil surface 204, a plurality of points on the first workpiece 100, extending along a line substantially perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the anvil, sequentially leave the anvil surface 204 one point at a time on a continuous basis until transfer from the anvil surface 204 is completed. Movement of the workpiece points from the anvil surface 204 is considered equivalent to a single second transfer point moving along the anvil surface 204 during workpiece transfer. The velocity at which the workpiece points move along, i.e., the velocity at which the second transfer point moves along, the anvil surface 204 is referred to as “a second transfer point velocity.”
In order to ensure each first workpiece 100 is properly transferred from the anvil 200 to a workpiece receiving surface 142c, the first transfer point velocity needs to be substantially equal to the second transfer point velocity. Too much of a difference between those two velocities will result in an improper transfer of a first workpiece 100 to a workpiece-receiving surface 142c, e.g., wrinkles, workpiece slipping out of position, excessive workpiece strain or tear.
The first transfer point velocity is determined as follows. It is presumed that during transfer of a first workpiece 100 to the workpiece-receiving surface 142c, the plurality of points on the first workpiece 100, extending along a line substantially perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the anvil 200, make sequential contact with the workpiece-receiving surface 142c one point at a time on a continuous and uniform basis until transfer to the workpiece-receiving surface 142c is completed. It is also presumed that transfer occurs during a time period −T≦t≦T. The first transfer point velocity, i.e., the velocity at which the first transfer point moves across the entire workpiece receiving surface length LH (defined below), in a time from t=−T to t=T, is determined as follows:
VTransferPtReltoHeadSurf=LH/2T
where LH is equal to the length, i.e., length component, of the workpiece receiving surface 142c along an axis substantially perpendicular to the axis of the anvil 200. LH will equal LHA when the longitudinal axis LWRS of the workpiece receiving surface 142c is substantially perpendicular to the axis of the anvil 200.
There are two components needed to determine the second transfer point velocity. The first is the movement of the workpiece-receiving surface 142c relative to the anvil surface 204. Referring to
VB represents the velocity of the transfer point relative to a fixed reference point. To determine the velocity of the transfer point relative to the rotating anvil surface 204, the anvil surface velocity needs to be included. The surface velocity of the anvil (VAnvSurf) due to rotation about its center is equal to the linear velocity of the first workpiece 100. The workpiece linear velocity is the combination of the production rate and the pitch between the first workpieces 100. For first workpieces 100 that have no gap between them, the pitch is equal to the length of the first workpieces 100.
VAnvSurf=Rate*LH
Rate is the first workpiece delivery rate in Hz.
Due to the anvil surface velocity (VAnvSurf), the transfer starting point (J) will be at a new location (J2) at the end of workpiece transfer (t=T), see FIG. 8. Similarly, the ending point (K) will be at a different initial location (K2) at the beginning of workpiece transfer (t=−T).
The velocity of the second transfer point relative to the anvil surface 204 is the combination of the second transfer point velocity VB from point J to point K and the anvil surface velocity VAnvSurf from point J to point J2. The second transfer point moves from point J to point K while a point on the anvil surface 204 which corresponds with point J at t=−T moves to point J2 at t=T. Therefore the effective travel distance of the second transfer point relative to the anvil surface 204 is the arc length from point J2 to point K. The arc length from point J to point K is the product of the velocity of vector B (VB) and the transfer time (2T). The length from point J to point J2 is the product of the anvil surface velocity (VAnvSurf) and the transfer time (2T) where anvil surface speed is equal to the workpiece linear velocity.
LengthJtoK=VB*2T
LengthJtoJ2=VAnvSurf*2T
Therefore, the effective total travel of the transfer point relative to the anvil surface 204 is:
EffectiveTotalTravel=LengthJtoK+LengthJtoJ2
The velocity of the second transfer point is EffectiveTotalTravel divided by the transfer time (2T).
VTransferPtReltoAnvilSurf=EffectiveTotalTravel/2T=VB+VAnvSurf
Average Velocity Mismatch between the first and second transfer point velocities is defined as the percent difference between the VTransferptReltoHeadSurf and VTransferPtReltoAnvilSurf.
AvgVelMismatch=[1−(VTransferptReltoHeadSurf/VTransferPtReltoAnvilSurf)]·100% EQ. A
Preferably, the second drive motor 44 effects rotation of the frame 42 and the gripping members 44a and 44b about the second axis A2 in conjunction with rotation of the support member 22 by the drive motor 24 such that, during transfer of a first workpiece 100 from the anvil 200 to a workpiece receiving surface 142c of a gripping member 44a and 44b, the first transfer point velocity is substantially equal to the second transfer point velocity. It is preferred that any difference between the first and second transfer point velocities fall within the range of from about −2.0% and +2.0%. If the difference between these velocities is less than −2.0% or greater than +2.0%, then the first workpiece 100 may stretch, bunch-up or slip on the workpiece-receiving surface 142c during the transfer process.
As a first workpiece 100 is received by the conveyor 300, a plurality of points on the first workpiece 100, extending along a line parallel to a longitudinal axis LC of the conveyor 300, see
As a first workpiece 100 is removed from the workpiece-receiving surface 142c, a plurality of points on the first workpiece 100, extending along a line substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis LC of the conveyor 300, see
In order to ensure each first workpiece 100 is properly transferred from the workpiece receiving surface 142c to the conveyor 300, the third transfer point velocity needs to be substantially equal to the fourth transfer point velocity. Too much of a difference between those two velocities will result in an improper transfer of a first workpiece 100 to the conveyor 300, e.g., wrinkles, workpiece slipping out of position, excessive workpiece strain or tear.
The third and fourth transfer point velocities are determined with reference to
For the simplified case with a constant support member angular velocity and constant gripping member angular velocity:
Substituting equations F-I into B-E gives the following equations J-M:
To solve for the angular velocity of the gripping member (Ks), set the linear velocity of the workpiece receiving surface 142c and the conveyor 300 to be equal at time t=0 sec.
Rp·Kp−Rs(Ks−Kp)=Rate·PitchConv
Solving for Ks gives:
TConv is solved via Eq N, set out below, with TConv set to the smallest value for TConv which makes the equation true:
RConv is selected so that GapConv, defined below, is never less than 0.0 mm.
Let Hmax be the absolute maximum of H1y(t) and H2y(t) over the range −TConv<t<TConv. Then the gap is the difference between RConv and Hmax and is solved via equation O, set out below.
GapConv=RConv−Hmax EQ. O
Tconv, RConv, HMax, and GapConv are determined/solved using an iterative process via equations K, M, N and O set out above.
The velocity of the fourth transfer point relative to the workpiece receiving surface 142c is the length LHC of the workpiece receiving surface 142c along an axis parallel to the longitudinal axis LC of the conveyor 300 divided by the time it takes for the transfer to occur (2*TConv).
VConvTranPtReltoWorkpieceSurface=LHC/2TConv
The velocity of the third transfer point relative to the surface of the conveyor 300 is the velocity of the transfer point moving across the conveyor 300 minus the velocity of the conveyor 300.
VConvTranPtReltoConveyorSurface=(2H2x(t=TConv)/2TConv)−Rate·PitchConv
The third and fourth transfer point velocity mismatch between the third and fourth transfer point velocities during transfer to the conveyor 300 is then solved via Equation P:
AvgVelMismatchAtRelease=[1−(VConvTranPtReltoconveyorSurface/VConvTranPtReltoWorkpieceSurface)]·100% EQ. P
Likewise, the second drive motor 44 effects rotation of the frame 42 and the gripping members 44a and 44b about the second axis A2 in conjunction with rotation of the support member 22 by the drive motor 24 such that, during transfer of a pair of first workpieces 100 from the workpiece receiving surfaces 142c of the first and second gripping members 44a and 44b to a continuous second workpiece 110, the third transfer point velocity is substantially equal to the fourth transfer point velocity. It is preferred that any difference between the third and fourth transfer point velocities fall within the range of from about −2.0% and +2.0%.
In the illustrated embodiment, the drive motor 44 comprises a conventional servo drive motor unit 244b including an integral encoder, which unit 244b is commercially available from Allen-Bradley under the product designation Model MPL-A4540F. A conventional gear reducer (not shown) is coupled to an output shaft of the unit 244b. An amplifier 46 is mounted to the second support plate 28b and is coupled to the unit 244b and the main controller 30, see FIG. 3. The amplifier 46 receives power via wiring (not shown) coupled to a power supply (not shown) and a conventional slip ring 49a mounted to the shaft 26 and the fixed frame member 24a, see FIG. 3A. During operation, the servo drive motor/encoder unit 244b generates encoder pulses representative of the angular position of the motor's output shaft relative to a reference point to the amplifier 46. The amplifier 46 determines the actual velocity of the motor output shaft from those encoder pulses and also forwards the encoder pulses, in a substantially unmodified form, to the main controller 30. The main controller 30, based on the encoder pulses from the unit 244b, determines the angular position and number of complete revolutions of the drive motor output shaft of the unit 244b relative to the reference point. As noted above, the main controller 30, based on the encoder pulses from the unit 24c, also determines the angular position and number of complete revolutions of the drive motor output shaft of unit 24c. Based on the angular positions and number of complete revolutions of the output shafts of the units 24c and 244b, the main controller 30 generates to the amplifier 46 a reference signal representative of a desired velocity for the motor of the unit 244b. In this case, the desired velocity of the motor of the unit 244b will vary based on the angular positions and number of complete revolutions of the motor output shafts of units 24c and 244b. The amplifier 46 compares the actual velocity of the motor of the unit 244b, determined using the encoder pulses, to the desired velocity as indicated by the reference signal from the main controller 30 and generates an appropriate drive (current) signal to the drive motor of the unit 244b so as to effect rotation of the motor and, hence, the frame 42 and the gripping members 44a and 44b about the second axis A2.
In particular, data is stored in the main controller 30 corresponding to the angular position and number of complete revolutions of the motor output shaft relative to a reference point for each unit 24c and 244b so that a signal is generated by the main controller 30 to the amplifier 46 representative of a desired velocity for the motor of the unit 244b which varies with the angular positions and number of complete revolutions of the motor output shafts of the units 24c and 244b. More particularly, the motor may be driven so as to cause the frame 42 and gripping members 44a and 44b to rotate in accordance with the displacement, velocity and acceleration curves illustrated in
The angular displacement, angular velocity (relative to the support member 22) and angular acceleration (relative to the support member 22) of the frame 42 and the first and second workpiece gripping members 44a and 44b as a function of angular position of the support member 22 is illustrated in
In
In the illustrated embodiment, the support member 22 rotates in a clockwise direction, as illustrated in
Preferably, the radius RP of the support member 22 (discussed below), the radius RS of each gripping member 44a, 44b (discussed below), the radius RA of the anvil 200 (discussed below), the length LH of each workpiece-receiving surface 142c along an axis perpendicular to the axis of the anvil 200, see
During workpiece transfer, the vacuum applied by the anvil 200 to a workpiece 100 is less than the vacuum applied by a workpiece-receiving surface 142c of a gripping member 44a, 44b.
It is also preferred that the radius RP of the support member 22, the radius RS of each gripping member 44a, 44b, the radius RA of the anvil 200, the length LHC of each workpiece-receiving surface 142c along an axis parallel to the longitudinal axis LC of the conveyor 300, the constant angular velocity of the support member 22, the angular velocity of each gripping member 44a, 44b, the perpendicular distance RConv from the support member center to the conveyor 300, and one-half of the total transfer time TConv are defined such that a gap between the nearest point on a planar workpiece-receiving surface 142c of a gripping member 44a, 44b to a corresponding, opposing point on the conveyor 300 during workpiece transfer is between about 0 mm and 2 mm. During workpiece transfer, the vacuum applied by a workpiece-receiving surface 142c of a gripping member 44a, 44b is removed just before a first workpiece 100 is transferred to a second workpiece 110. The valve V, illustrated in
The planar workpiece-receiving surface 142c of each gripping member 44a, 44b preferably has a length LHA (see
Once the length LHA of the workpiece-receiving surface 142c has been defined, the gripping members 44a, 44b are capable of receiving from the anvil 200 first workpieces 100 having a length equal to or less than the length LHA of the workpiece-receiving surface 142c.
It is contemplated that a first gap between adjacent edges of sequential first workpieces 100 provided on the anvil 200 may be 0 or equal to a first predefined length. The speed of the rotatable member 42 and first and second workpiece gripping members 44a and 44b may be varied so that a second gap between those same first workpieces 100, after being transferred to a corresponding second workpiece 110, is equal to a second predefined length, which is not equal to the length of the first gap. Alternatively, the second predefined length may be equal to the length of the first gap.
As noted above, the workpiece gripping members 44a and 44b are rotatable about a pair of space-apart third axes A3a and A3b via third servo drive motors 46a and 46b. In particular, the drive motors 46a and 46b are controlled so as to rotate the first workpieces 100 from a first angular position at the anvil 200 to a desired, second angular position so that the first workpieces 100 are transferred to and positioned relative to the second workpiece 110 at the second angular position. For example, the first workpieces 100 may be rotated by the gripping members 44a and 44b from a first angular position relative to the anvil 200 (in
Each third servo drive motor 46a, 46b comprises a servo motor unit 246 including an integral encoder and controller, one of which is commercially available from Animatics Corporation under the product designation SM1720, which unit 246 is coupled to the rotatable frame 42. A conventional gear reducer (not shown) is coupled to the output shaft of each unit 246. A slip ring 170, shown only in
It is contemplated that a transfer apparatus having four workpiece gripping structures 40a-40d equally spaced about a support member 22 may be constructed in accordance with the present invention as follows. The support member 22 has a radius RP of 0.4 m; each gripping member 44a, 44b has a radius RS of 0.25 m; and the anvil 200 has a radius RA of 0.240324 m, see FIG. 6. Each workpiece-receiving surface 142c of each gripping member 44a, 44b has a length LHA extending along its longitudinal axis LWRS equal to about 0.16 m; a length LH extending along an axis perpendicular to the axis of the anvil 200 during transfer from the anvil 200 of about 0.16 m and a length LHC extending along an axis parallel to the longitudinal axis LC of the conveyor 300 during transfer to the conveyor 300 of about 0.16 m. Pairs of first workpieces 100 are transferred from the anvil 200 at a rate of 750 pairs per minute. The anvil 200 is rotated at a constant angular velocity of about 8.322 radians/second, the support member 22 is rotated at a substantially constant angular velocity of about 19.635 radians/second, and each workpiece gripping member 44a, 44b is rotated at an angular velocity corresponding to the velocity curve illustrated in FIG. 4A. During workpiece transfer from the anvil 200 to the gripping members 42a, 42b, the angular velocity of each gripping member 44a, 44b is substantially constant and equal to about 59.051 radians/second. Also during workpiece transfer from the anvil 200 to the gripping members 42a, 42b, by calculation, a first transfer point velocity is substantially equal to 11.473 m/s and a second transfer point velocity is equal to 11.511 m/s such that the difference between those two velocities is about 0.4%. Further, the maximum gap between any point on a planar workpiece-receiving surface 142c of a gripping member 44a, 44b and a corresponding, opposing point on the anvil outer surface 204 during workpiece transfer is believed to be, by calculation, between about 0 and about 0.074 mm. Still further, by calculation, the maximum gap between any point on a planar workpiece-receiving surface 142c of a gripping member 44a, 44b and a corresponding, opposing point on the conveyor 300 during workpiece transfer is between about 0.0 mm and 0.8 mm. During workpiece transfer from the gripping members 42a, 42b to the conveyor 300, by calculation, a third transfer point velocity is substantially equal to 25.797 m/s and a fourth transfer point velocity is equal to 25.8065 m/s such that the difference between those two velocities is about 0.04%. The pitch between first workpieces 100 on the second workpiece 110 is 0.5 m, the angular velocity of the workpiece gripping members 44a, 44b during transfer of the first workpieces 100 to the second workpiece 110 is 26.0509 radians/sec; RConv is 0.6508 m and TConv is 0.0031 second. The conveyor 300 may move at a linear speed of about 6.25 m/s.
A transfer apparatus including only three workpiece gripping structures provided equally spaced about a support member 22 may be constructed as follows. The support member 22 has a radius RP of 1.031 m; each gripping member 44a, 44b has a radius RS of 0.850 m; and the anvil 200 has a radius RA of 0.971 m. Each workpiece-receiving surface 142c of each gripping member 44a, 44b has a length LHA extending along its longitudinal axis LWRS of about 0.50 m, a length LH extending along an axis perpendicular to the axis of the anvil 200 during transfer from the anvil 200 of about 0.50 m and a length LHC (i.e., length component) extending along an axis parallel to the longitudinal axis LC of the conveyor 300 during transfer to the conveyor 300 of about 0.1 m. Pairs of first workpieces 100 are transferred from the anvil 200 at rate of about 540 pairs/minute. The anvil 200 is rotated at a constant angular velocity of about 4.631 radians/second, the support member 22 is rotated at a substantially constant angular velocity of about 18.85 radians/second, and each workpiece gripping member 44a, 44b is rotated at an angular velocity corresponding to the velocity curve illustrated in FIG. 4B. During workpiece transfer from the anvil to the first workpiece receiving surfaces, the angular velocity of each gripping member 44a, 44b is substantially constant and equaled to about 47.007 radians/second. Also during workpiece transfer from the anvil 200 to the gripping members 42a, 42b, by calculation, a first transfer point velocity is substantially equal to 31.863 m/s and a second transfer point, velocity is equal to 31.847 m/s such that the difference between those two velocities is about −0.5%. Further, by calculation, the maximum gap between any point on a planar workpiece-receiving surface 142c of a gripping member 44a, 44b and a corresponding, opposing point on the anvil outer surface 204 during workpiece transfer is between about 0.0 mm and about 0.2 mm. Still further, by calculation, the maximum gap between any point on a planar workpiece-receiving surface 142c of the gripping member 44a, 44b and a corresponding, opposing point on the conveyor 300 during workpiece transfer is between about 0.09 mm and about 1.4 mm. During workpiece transfer from the gripping members 42a, 42b to the conveyor 300, by calculation, a third transfer point velocity is equal to 57.143 m/s and a fourth transfer point velocity is equal to 57.125 m/s such that the difference between those two velocities is about 0.03%. The pitch between first workpieces 100 on the second workpiece 110 is 0.5 m, the angular velocity of the workpiece gripping members 44a, 44b during transfer of the first workpieces 100 to the second workpiece 110 is 36.4 radians/sec; RConv is 1.8824 m and TConv is 0.0014 second. The conveyor 300 may move at a linear velocity of about 4.5 m/s.
Further equations will now be developed which can be used, along with the equations set out above, to design a transfer system 10 in accordance with the present invention.
To achieve proper first workpiece transfer, both position and velocity requirements must be met. If either the position or velocity of the workpiece receiving surface 142c relative to the anvil 200 is incorrect, either the workpiece 100 will not be transferred properly, or there may be a collision between the surface 142c and the anvil 200.
The relationships between the workpiece receiving surface and anvil surface geometry and kinetics which enable a first workpiece 100 to be transferred between the surface 142c and the anvil 200 will now be described.
With regard to
Assumptions:
It is assumed that the support member radius (Rp) and the number of gripping members 44a, 44b which are equally positioned about the support member 22 are known. It is desired to solve for the following unknowns to enable proper workpiece transfer:
Position (See FIG. 7)
For perfect contact, the difference between the x components and the difference between the y components will both be zero.
Ax−Bx=0
Ay−By=0
Velocity
To ensure proper transfer of pairs of workpieces 100 from the anvil surface 204 to the workpiece receiving surface 142c, the transfer rate of the workpieces 100 from the anvil surface 204 to the workpiece receiving surface 142c needs to be evaluated. More specifically, to ensure a proper transfer, the change in vectors {right arrow over (A)} and {right arrow over (B)} with respect to time should be equal. This ensures the transfer point on the workpiece receiving surface 142c coincides with the desired transfer point on the anvil surface 204 at any given instance during workpiece transfer. These changes in vector vectors {right arrow over (A)} and {right arrow over (B)} with respect to time are velocities {right arrow over (V)}A and {right arrow over (V)}B respectively.
{right arrow over (V)}B={right arrow over (V)}A
{right arrow over (V)}A is made up of x and y components
{right arrow over (V)}B is made up of x and y components
For perfectly matched velocity between the workpiece-receiving surface 142c and the anvil 200, the velocity components will be equal.
{right arrow over (V)}Ax−{right arrow over (V)}Bx=0 and {right arrow over (V)}Ay−{right arrow over (V)}By=0
Solution:
Solving Equations A, N, O, P (set out above) and Equation 21 (set out below) simultaneously using an iterative process while maintaining the difference between the first and second transfer point velocities within a desired range, the difference between the third and fourth transfer point velocities within a desired range, both discussed above, an anvil surface/workpiece receiving surface gap (GapA) within a desired range, discussed below, a workpiece receiving surface/conveyor gap (GapConv) within a desired range, discussed above, and setting RConv to a value such that GapConv is never less than 0.0 mm, will give the following six unknown variables which need to be determined: anvil radius (Ra), gripping member radius (Rs), gripping member position as a function of time (Θs(t)), one-half of the total workpiece-receiving surface 142c/anvil 200 transfer time (T); RConv; and TConv.
More Specific Embodiment:
In this embodiment, it is presumed that the support member and gripping member angular velocities are constant during workpiece transfer.
This leads to some simplifications of the equations.
Constant support member velocity
Constant gripping member velocity
Θs(t)=Ks·t EQ. 11
Kp=constant representing support member angular velocity during transfer; Ks=constant representing gripping member angular velocity during transfer.
Substituting equations 9-12 into 1-8 gives:
EQ. 13
Solution:
Solving Equations A, N, O, P (set out above) and equation 21 (set out below) simultaneously using an iterative process while maintaining the difference between the first and second transfer point velocities within a desired range, the difference between the third and fourth transfer point velocities within a desired range, both discussed above, an anvil surface/workpiece receiving surface gap (GapA) within a desired range, discussed below, a workpiece receiving surface/conveyor gap (GapConv) within a desired range, discussed above, and setting RConv to a value such that GapConv is never less than 0.0 mm, will give the following six unknown variables which need to be determined: anvil radius (Ra), gripping member radius (Rs), gripping member position as a function of time (Θs(t)), one-half of the total transfer time (T); RConv; and TConv.
Gap or Interference Between Anvil Surface and the Workpiece-Receiving Surface:
The gap or interference is the difference between the anvil radius (Ra) and the shortest distance between the workpiece-receiving surface and the anvil center of rotation at a given time.
Line 1 below represents the workpiece-receiving surface 142c and Line 2 (not shown) represents a line perpendicular to the workpiece-receiving surface which passes through the anvil center of rotation. Point (x1,y1) is at the center of the Workpiece-receiving surface. Point (x2,y2) is the anvil center of rotation.
The intersection of these two lines is:
The gap is then represented by:
If GapA is positive, then there is a clearance between the workpiece-receiving surface 142c and the anvil 200. If it is negative, then there is interference. The maximum Gap/Interference is found by evaluating GapA over the full range of time (t) from −T to T.
As noted above, it is preferred that the maximum GapA over the range of time (t) from −T to T between the nearest point on a planar workpiece-receiving surface 142c of the gripping member 44a, 44b, to a corresponding, opposing point on a first workpiece 100 secured to anvil outer surface 204 during workpiece transfer be between about 0 mm and 2 mm.
With regard to the gap between the workpiece-receiving surface 142c and the conveyor, if GapConv is positive, then there is a clearance between the workpiece-receiving surface 142c and the conveyor 300. If it is negative, then there is interference. The maximum Gap/Interference is found by evaluating GapConv over the full range of time (t) from −Tconv to Tconv.
It is preferred that the maximum GapConv (determined using the following equation as noted above: GapConv=RConv−Hmax) over the range of time (t) from −Tconv to TConv between the nearest point on a planar workpiece-receiving surface 142c of the gripping member 44a, 44b, to a corresponding, opposing point on the conveyor 300 during workpiece transfer be between about 0 mm and 2 mm.
The above discussion is based on transferring a theoretical workpiece 100 with a zero thickness. In practice, for a workpiece 100 with a non-zero thickness, D, that thickness needs to be considered. More specifically, if the gap (GapA or GapConv) for the zero thickness workpiece 100 was found to be 0, then the gap (GapA or GapConv) for a workpiece 100 with thickness D will be 0−D or −D, where the negative implies an interference or crash situation. In order to maintain the gap (GapA or GapConv) within a desired range to ensure proper workpiece transfer, the gripping member radius Rs needs to be adjusted for the workpiece thickness, D. More specifically, the gripping member radius of the actual equipment will be the gripping member radius from the zero thickness workpiece solution (Rs) minus the workpiece thickness, D. It should be noted that after selecting the actual gripping member radius for a first workpiece 100 of thickness, D, there is some range of first workpiece thicknesses less than D where the resulting gap will still fall within the desired range, thus enabling, without modification, the use of the same gripping member radius for a multiplicity of workpiece thicknesses, D.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2359432 | McNamara | Oct 1944 | A |
4298422 | Zodrow | Nov 1981 | A |
4300967 | Sigl | Nov 1981 | A |
4397704 | Frick | Aug 1983 | A |
4486192 | Sigl | Dec 1984 | A |
4578133 | Oshefsky et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4596545 | Greenwell | Jun 1986 | A |
4648928 | Ales | Mar 1987 | A |
4726876 | Tomsovic, Jr. | Feb 1988 | A |
4901843 | Lashyro | Feb 1990 | A |
5104116 | Pohjola | Apr 1992 | A |
5224405 | Pohjola | Jul 1993 | A |
5407513 | Hayden et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5556504 | Rajala et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
6139004 | Couillard et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
20020103468 | Nakakado et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 302 326 | Jan 1997 | GB |
WO 9510472 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 0000419 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0102277 | Jan 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040099114 A1 | May 2004 | US |