Transferring or migrating portions of data objects, such as block-level data migration or chunk-based data migration

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10572445
  • Patent Number
    10,572,445
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 18, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 25, 2020
    4 years ago
  • CPC
    • G06F16/13
    • G06F16/119
  • Field of Search
    • CPC
    • G06F17/30864
    • G06F17/30371
    • G06F17/30088
    • G06F17/30076
    • G06F17/3007
    • G06F17/30073
    • G06F17/30079
    • G06F17/30067
    • G06F17/301
    • G06F17/3012
    • G06F16/27
    • G06F16/113
    • G06F16/184
    • G06F16/1727
    • G06F16/275
    • G06F16/21
    • G06F16/214
    • G06F16/1748
    • G06F16/1827
    • G06F16/2282
    • G06F16/2358
    • G06F16/119
  • International Classifications
    • G06F16/00
    • G06F16/13
    • G06F16/11
    • Term Extension
      1053
Abstract
A system and method for migrating data objects based on portions of the data objects is described. The system may transfer portions of files, folders, and other data objects from primary storage to secondary storage based on certain criteria, such as time-based criteria, age-based criteria, and so on. An increment may be one or more blocks of a data object, or one or more chunks of a data object, or other segments that combine to form or store a data object. For example, the system identifies one or more blocks of a data object that satisfy a certain criteria, and migrates the identified blocks. The system may determine that a certain number of blocks of a file have not been modified or called by a file system in a certain time period, and migrate these blocks to secondary storage.
Description
BACKGROUND

Data storage systems contain large amounts of data. This data includes personal data, such as financial data, customer/client/patient contact data, audio/visual data, and much more. Computer systems often contain word processing documents, engineering diagrams, spreadsheets, business strategy presentations, email mailboxes, and so on. With the proliferation of computer systems and the ease of creating content, the amount of content in an organization has expanded rapidly. Even small offices often have more information stored than any single employee can know about or locate.


To that end, both companies and individuals rely on data storage systems to store, protect, and/or hold old data, such as data no longer actively needed. Often, these data storage systems perform data migration, moving data from primary storage (containing actively needed data) to secondary storage (such as backup storage or archives). Typical data storage systems transfer data in the forms of files, folders, and so on. For example, the typical data storage system may transfer data from a data store associated with a user to secondary storage while maintaining the structure and application format of the files themselves.


To restore the data, these systems then require knowledge of applications that create the data. Additionally, some files, can be very large, and restoring a large file can be costly, time consuming, and resource intensive.


The need exists for a system that overcomes the above problems, as well as one that provides additional benefits. Overall, the examples herein of some prior or related systems and their associated limitations are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of existing or prior systems will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon reading the following Detailed Description.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating components of a data stream utilized by a suitable data storage system.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a data storage system.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an example of components of a server used in data storage operations.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a system for performing increment-based data migration.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating the intermediate component of FIG. 4.



FIGS. 6A and 6B are schematic diagrams illustrating a data store before and after a block-based data migration, respectively.



FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine for performing block-level data migration.



FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating a system for providing chunk-based data migration and/or restoration.



FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine for performing chunk-level data migration.



FIG. 10 is flow diagram illustrating a routine for block-based or chunk-based data restoration and modification.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Overview


Described in detail herein is a system and method that transfers or migrates data objects (such as files, folders, data stores, and/or discrete data component(s) by migrating segments, portions, increments, or proper subsets of the data objects. The system may transfer increments of files, folders, and other data objects from primary storage (or other sources) to secondary storage based on certain criteria, such as time-based criteria, age-based criteria, and so on. An increment may be one or more blocks of a data object, or one or more chunks of a data object, or other portions that combine to form, store, and/or contain a data object, such as a file.


In some examples, the system performs block-based migration of data. That is, the system identifies one or more blocks of a data object that satisfy a certain criteria, and migrates the identified blocks. For example, the system may determine that a certain number of blocks of a file have not been modified or called by a file system within a certain time period, and migrate these blocks to secondary storage. The system then maintains the other blocks of the file in primary storage. In some cases, the system automatically migrates data without requiring user input. Additionally, the migration may be transparent to a user.


In some examples, the system performs chunk-based migration of data. A chunk is, for example, a group or set of blocks. One or more chunks may comprise a file, folder, or other data object. The system identifies one or more chunks of a data object that satisfy a certain criteria, and migrates the identified chunks. For example, the system may determine that a certain number of chunks of a file have not been modified or called by a file system in a certain time period, and migrate these chunks to secondary storage. The system then maintains the other chunks of the file in primary storage. Further details regarding chunks and chunk-based storage may be found in U.S. Patent Application No. 61/180,791, entitled BLOCK-LEVEL SINGLE INSTANCING, filed May 22, 2009.


In some examples, the system leverages the block-based or chunk-based data migration in order to restore portions of data objects without restoring entire data objects. For example, the system can restore one or more blocks of a file, present the data contained by the blocks, receive modifications to the data, and update the blocks, and hence the file.


The system will now be described with respect to various examples. The following description provides specific details for a thorough understanding of, and enabling description for, these examples of the system. However, one skilled in the art will understand that the system may be practiced without these details. In other instances, well-known structures and functions have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the examples of the system.


The terminology used in the description presented below is intended to be interpreted in its broadest reasonable manner, even though it is being used in conjunction with a detailed description of certain specific examples of the system. Certain terms may even be emphasized below; however, any terminology intended to be interpreted in any restricted manner will be overtly and specifically defined as such in this Detailed Description section.


Suitable System


Referring to FIG. 1, a block diagram illustrating components of a data stream utilized by a suitable data storage and recovery system, such as a system that performs block-based and/or chunk-based data migration, is shown. The stream 110 may include a client 111, a media agent 112, and a secondary storage device 113. For example, in storage operations, the system may store, receive and/or prepare data, such as blocks or chunks, to be stored, copied or backed up at a server or client 111. The system may then transfer the data to be stored to media agent 112, which may then refer to storage policies, schedule policies, and/retention policies (and other policies) to choose a secondary storage device 113. The media agent 112 may include or be associated with an intermediate component, to be discussed herein.


The secondary storage device 113 receives the data from the media agent 112 and stores the data as a secondary copy, such as a backup copy. Secondary storage devices may be magnetic tapes, optical disks, USB and other similar media, disk and tape drives, and so on. Of course, the system may employ other configurations of stream components not shown in the Figure.


Referring to FIG. 2, a block diagram illustrating an example of a data storage and recovery system 200 is shown. Data storage systems may contain some or all of the following components, depending on the needs of the system. FIG. 2 and the following discussion provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment in which the system can be implemented. Although not required, aspects of the system are described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as routines executed by a general-purpose computer, e.g., a server computer, wireless device or personal computer. Those skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the system can be practiced with other communications, data processing, or computer system configurations, including: Internet appliances, network PCs, mini-computers, mainframe computers, and the like. Indeed, the terms “computer,” “host,” and “host computer” are generally used interchangeably herein, and refer to any of the above devices and systems, as well as any data processor.


Aspects of the system can be embodied in a special purpose computer or data processor that is specifically programmed, configured, or constructed to perform one or more of the computer-executable instructions explained in detail herein. Aspects of the system can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks or modules are performed by remote processing devices, which are linked through a communications network, such as a Local Area Network (LAN), Wide Area Network (WAN), Storage Area Network (SAN), Fibre Channel, or the Internet. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.


Aspects of the system may be stored or distributed on computer-readable media, including tangible storage media, such as magnetically or optically readable computer discs, hard-wired or preprogrammed chips (e.g., EEPROM semiconductor chips), nanotechnology memory, biological memory, or other data storage media. Indeed, computer implemented instructions, data structures, screen displays, and other data under aspects of the system may be distributed over the Internet or over other networks (including wireless networks), on a propagated signal on a propagation medium (e.g., an electromagnetic wave(s), a sound wave, etc.) over a period of time, or they may be provided on any analog or digital network (packet switched, circuit switched, or other scheme). Those skilled in the relevant art will recognize that portions of the system reside on a server computer, while corresponding portions reside on a client computer, and thus, while certain hardware platforms are described herein, aspects of the system are equally applicable to nodes on a network.


For example, the data storage system 200 contains a storage manager 210, one or more clients 111, one or more media agents 112, and one or more storage devices 113. Storage manager 210 controls media agents 112, which may be responsible for transferring data to storage devices 113. Storage manager 210 includes a jobs agent 211, a management agent 212, a database 213, and/or an interface module 214. Storage manager 210 communicates with client(s) 111. One or more clients 111 may access data to be stored by the system from database 222 via a data agent 221. The system uses media agents 112, which contain databases 231, to transfer and store data into storage devices 113. Client databases 222 may contain data files and other information, while media agent databases may contain indices and other data structures that store the data at secondary storage devices, for example.


The data storage and recovery system may include software and/or hardware components and modules used in data storage operations. The components may be storage resources that function to copy data during storage operations. The components may perform other storage operations (or storage management operations) other that operations used in data stores. For example, some resources may create, store, retrieve, and/or migrate primary or secondary data copies of data. Additionally, some resources may create indices and other tables relied upon by the data storage system and other data recovery systems. The secondary copies may include snapshot copies and associated indices, but may also include other backup copies such as HSM copies, archive copies, auxiliary copies, and so on. The resources may also perform storage management functions that may communicate information to higher level components, such as global management resources.


In some examples, the system performs storage operations based on storage policies, as mentioned above. For example, a storage policy includes a set of preferences or other criteria to be considered during storage operations. The storage policy may determine or define a storage location and/or set of preferences about how the system transfers data to the location and what processes the system performs on the data before, during, or after the data transfer. In some cases, a storage policy may define a logical bucket in which to transfer, store or copy data from a source to a data store, such as storage media. Storage policies may be stored in storage manager 210, or may be stored in other resources, such as a global manager, a media agent, and so on. Further details regarding storage management and resources for storage management will now be discussed.


Referring to FIG. 3, a block diagram illustrating an example of components of a server used in data storage operations is shown. A server, such as storage manager 210, may communicate with clients 111 to determine data to be copied to storage media. As described above, the storage manager 210 may contain a jobs agent 211, a management agent 212, a database 213, and/or an interface module. Jobs agent 211 may manage and control the scheduling of jobs (such as copying data files) from clients 111 to media agents 112. Management agent 212 may control the overall functionality and processes of the data storage system, or may communicate with global managers. Database 213 or another data structure may store storage policies, schedule policies, retention policies, or other information, such as historical storage statistics, storage trend statistics, and so on. Interface module 215 may interact with a user interface, enabling the system to present information to administrators and receive feedback or other input from the administrators or with other components of the system (such as via APIs).


In some examples, the system performs some or all the operations described herein using an intermediate component, virtual storage device, virtual device driver, virtual disk driver, or other intermediary capable of mounting to a file system and communicating with a storage device. That is, an intermediate component may communicatively reside between a file system and a primary data store that contains data created by the file system and a secondary data store. The intermediate component enables flexibility during data restoration, enabling a file system to indirectly access a secondary copy of data in order to identify information associated with data stored by the secondary copy, among other benefits.


Data Migration System


Referring to FIG. 4, a block diagram illustrating a system for performing portion-based data migration is shown. The system components include a data creation and/or modification component 410, an intermediate component 420, and a data storage component 430. The restore component 410 may include a client portion 415, such as a client portion that receives input from users. A file system 417, as discussed herein, may organize and provide data to applications, user interfaces, and so on to the user, among other things. The file system creates, updates, modifies, and/or removes data from a data store, based on input from users. The file system 417 may store the created data in one or more data stores, such as a local database 418 that provides primary storage. For example, the database 418 may be a hard drive or hard disk that stores data produced by the file system as primary copies or production copies of the data. The system components may also include an intermediate component 420 (further described herein), such as a virtual disk driver. The intermediate component 420 communicates with a disk driver 435 and mounted disk 437, which together may act as the data storage component 430. Additionally, the intermediate component 420 may be located between the file system 417 and database 418. The data storage component provides secondary storage, and may store secondary copies of data generated by the file system 417, such as secondary copies of primary copies stored in database 418.


Referring to FIG. 5, a block diagram illustrating the intermediate component 420 of FIG. 4 is shown. The intermediate component 420 includes a restore module 510 that may contain its own file system 515. The restore module 510 (or component, sub-system, and so on), may communicate with a file system, such as the file system 417. Further details with respect the functionality of the restore module 510 is described herein.


The intermediate component 420 may also include a storage device module 520 that communicates with storage devices, such as disk driver 435 and disk 437 (or other fixed or removable media). The storage device module 520 may include an index 525 or allocation table that identifies available media for data storage, contains information associated with data stored via the intermediate component 420, and so on.


The intermediate component 420 may also include a cache 530 (or, a cache module or interface that communicates with an external cache), and/or other agents or modules 540, such as modules that index files, classify files, manage files or information, and so on.


Block-Based Data Migration


Block-level migration, or block-based data migration, involves migrating disk blocks from a primary data store (e.g., a disk partition) to secondary media. Using block-level migration, a data storage system transfers blocks on a disk partition that have not been recently accessed to secondary storage, freeing up space on the disk. In order to expand the database, the system moves data from the database to other locations, such as other databases or storage locations. Typically, such expansion requires knowledge of the database, such as the database application, the database schema, and so on. However, using block-level migration, the system can expand or extend a database without any knowledge of the applications or schema of the database, providing for transparent migration and/or restoration of data from one storage location to another. This can be helpful when migrating data from virtual machines that contain large files, (e.g., large files created by applications such as Vmware, Microsoft Virtual Server, and so on). The system may implement block-level migration processes as software device drivers, but may also implement block-level migration in disk hardware.


As described herein, the system can transfer or migrate certain blocks of a data object from one data store to another, such as from primary storage that contains a primary copy of the data object to secondary storage that contains or will contain a secondary copy of the primary copy of the data object. Referring to FIGS. 6A-6B, a schematic diagram illustrating contents of two data stores before and after a block-based data migration is shown. In FIG. 6A, a first data store 610 contains primary copies (i.e., production copies) of two data objects, a first data object 620 and a second data object 630. The first data object comprises blocks A and A1, where blocks A are blocks that satisfy or meet certain storage criteria (such as blocks that have not been modified since creation or not been modified within a certain period of time) and blocks A′ are blocks that do not meet the criteria (such as blocks that have been modified within the certain time period). The second data object comprises blocks B and B′, where blocks B satisfy the criteria and blocks B′ do not meet the criteria.



FIG. 6B depicts the first data store 610 after a block-based data migration of the two data objects 620 and 630. In this example, the system only transfers the data from blocks that satisfy a criteria (blocks A and B) from the first data store 610 to a second data store 640, such as secondary storage 642, 644. The secondary storage may include one or more magnetic tapes, one or more optical disks, and so on. The system maintains data in the remaining blocks (blocks A′ and B′) within the first data store 610.


The system can perform file system data migration at a block level, unlike previous systems that only migrate data at the file level (that is, they have a file-level granularity). By tracking migrated blocks, the system can also restore data at the block level, which may avoid cost and time problems associated with restoring data at the file level or may assist in defragmenting a storage device. Further details regarding the block-level restoration of data is be discussed herein.


Referring to FIG. 7, a flow diagram illustrating a routine 700 for performing block-level data migration is shown. In step 710, the system identifies data blocks within a data store that satisfy a certain criteria. The system may track data blocks and access the blocks via APIs. The data store may be a database associated with a file system, a SQL database, a Microsoft Exchange mailbox, and so on. The system may compare some or all of the blocks (or, information associated with the blocks) of the data store with predetermined criteria. The predetermined criteria may be time-based criteria within a storage policy or data retention policy.


In some examples, the system identifies blocks set to be “aged off” from the data store. That is, the system identifies blocks created, changed, or last modified before a certain date and time. For example, the system may review a data store for all data blocks that satisfy a criterion or criteria. The data store may be an electronic mailbox or personal folders (.pst) file for a Microsoft Exchange user, and the criterion may define, for example, all blocks or emails last modified or changed thirty days ago or earlier. The system compares information associated with the blocks, such as metadata associated with the blocks, to the criteria, and identifies all blocks that satisfy the criteria. For example, the system identifies all blocks in the .pst file not modified within the past thirty days. The identified blocks may include all the blocks for some emails and/or a portion of the blocks for other emails. That is, for a given email (or data object), a first portion of the blocks that include the email may satisfy the criteria, while a second portion of the blocks that include the same email may not satisfy the criteria. In other words, a file or a data object can be divided into parts or portions, and only some of the parts or portions change.


To determine which blocks have changed, and when, the system can monitor the activity of the file system via the intermediate component 420, (e.g., the virtual device driver). The system may store a data structure, such as a bitmap, table, log, and so on within the cache 530 or other memory of the intermediate component 420, and update the bitmap whenever the file system calls the database 418 to access and update or change data blocks within the database 418. The intermediate component 420 traps the command to the disk driver, where that command identifies certain blocks on a disk for access or modifications, and writes to the bitmap the changed blocks and the time of the change. The bitmap may include information such as an identification of changed blocks and a date and a time the blocks were changed. The bitmap, which may be a table, data structure, or group of pointers, such as a snapshot, may also include other information, such as information that maps file names to blocks, information that maps chunks to blocks and/or file names, and so on. Table 1 provides entry information for a bitmap tracking the activity of a file system with the “/users” directory:












TABLE 1







Blocks
Date and Time Modified









/users/blocks1-100
09.08.2008 @14:30



/users/blocks101-105
09.04.2008 @12:23



/users2/blocks106-110
09.04.2008 @11:34



/users3/blocks110-1000
08.05.2008 @10:34










Thus, if a storage policy identified the time 08.30.2008@12:00 as a threshold time criteria, where data modified after the time is to be retained, the system would identify, in step 710, blocks 110-1000 as having satisfied the criteria. Thus, the system, via the intermediate component 420, can monitor what blocks are requested by a file system, and act accordingly, as described herein.


In step 720, the system transfers data within the identified blocks from the data store to a media agent, to be stored in a different data store. The system may perform some or all of the processes described with respect to FIGS. 1-3 when transferring the data to the media agent. For example, before transferring data, the system may review a storage policy as described herein to select a media agent, such as media agent 112, based on instructions within the storage policy. In step 725, the system optionally updates an allocation table, such as a file allocation table (FAT) for a file system associated with the data store, to indicate the data blocks that no longer contain data and are now free to receive and store data from the file system.


In step 730, via the media agent, the system stores data from the blocks to a different data store. In some cases, the system, via the media agent, stores the data from the blocks to a secondary storage device, such as a magnetic tape or optical disk. For example, the system may store the data from the blocks in secondary copies of the data store, such as a backup copy, an archive copy, and so on. In some cases, the system stores the data from the blocks to a storage device located near and/or associated with the data store, such as to a quick recovery volume that facilitates quick restores of data.


The system may create, generate, update, and/or include an allocation table, (such as a table for the data store) that tracks the transferred data and the data that was not transferred. The table may include information identifying the original data blocks for the data, the name of the data object, the location of any transferred data blocks, and so on. For example, Table 2 provides entry information for an example .pst file:












TABLE 2







Name of Data Object
Location of data









Email1
C:/users/blocks1-100



Email2.1 (body of email)
C:/users/blocks101-120



Email2.2 (attachment)
X:/remov1/blocks1-250



Email3
X:/remov2/blocks300-500










In the above example, the data for “Email2” is stored in two locations, a local data store (C:/) and an off-site data store (X:/). The system maintains the body of the email, recently modified or accessed, at a location within a data store associated with a file system, “C:/users/blocks101-120.” The system stores the attachment, not recently modified or accessed, in a separate data store, “X:/remov1/blocks1-250.” Of course, the table may include other information, fields, or entries not shown. For example, when the system stored data to tape, the table may include tape identification information, tape offset information, and so on.


Chunk-Based Data Migration


Chunked file migration, or chunk-based data migration, involves splitting a data object into two or more portions of the data object, creating an index that tracks the portions, and storing the data object to secondary storage via the two or more portions. Among other things, the chunk-based migration provides for fast and efficient storage of a data object. Additionally, chunk-based migration facilitates fast and efficient recall of a data object, such as the large files described herein. For example, if a user modifies a migrated file, chunk-based migration enables a data restore component to only retrieve from, and migrate back to, secondary storage the chunk containing the modified portion of the file, and not the entire file. In some cases, chunk-based migration may collaborate with components that provide file format and/or database schema information in order to facilitate data recovery.


As described above, in some examples the system migrates chunks of data (sets of blocks) that comprise a data object from one data store to another. Referring to FIG. 8, a block diagram illustrating a system 800 for providing chunk-based data migration and/or restoration is shown. The system 800 includes a file system 810, a callback layer 820, which interacts with the file system, and a device driver 830, which reads from and writes data to a data store 840 such as removable media including magnetic tapes, optical disks, and so on. Further details with respect to the callback layer 820 will be described herein.


As described above, the system migrates data via one or more chunks, such as sets of blocks. A data object, such as a file, may comprise two or more chunks. A chunk may be a logical division of a data object. For example, a .pst file may include two or more chucks: a first chunk that stores data associated with an index of a user's mailbox, and one or more chunks that stores email, attachments, and so on within the user's mailbox. A chunk is a proper subset of all the blocks comprising a file. That is, for a file consisting of n blocks, the largest chunk of the file comprises at most n−1 blocks.


The system 800 may include a chunking component 815 that divides data objects, such as files, into chunks. The chunking component 815 may receive files to be stored in database 418, divide the files into two or more chunks, and store the files as two or more chunks in database 418. The chunking component 815 may update an index that associated information associated with files with the chunks of the file, the data blocks of the chunks, and so on.


The chunking component 815 may perform different processes when determining how to divide a data object. For example, the chunking component 815 may include indexing, header, and other identifying information or metadata in a first chunk, and include the payload in other chunks. The chunking component 815 may follow a rules-based process when dividing a data object. The rules may define a minimum or maximum data size for a chunk, a time of creation for data within a chunk, a type of data within a chunk, and so on.


For example, the chunking component 815 may divide a user mailbox (such as a .pst file) into a number of chunks, based on various rules that assign emails within the mailbox to chunks based on the metadata associated with the emails. The chunking component 815 may place an index of the mailbox in a first chunk and the emails in other chunks. The chunking component 815 may then divide the other chunks based on dates of creation, deletion or reception of the emails, size of the emails, sender of the emails, type of emails, and so on. Thus, as an example, the chunking component may divide a mailbox as follows:


















User1/Chunk1
Index



User1/Chunk2
Sent emails



User1/Chunk3
Received emails



User1/Chunk4
Deleted emails



User1/Chunk5
All Attachments.











Of course, other divisions are possible. Chunks may not necessarily fall within logical divisions. For example, the chunking component may divide a data object based on information or instructions not associated with the data object, such as information about data storage resources, information about a target secondary storage device, historical information about previous divisions, and so on.


The system may perform chunking at various times or in different locations of a data storage system. For example, although FIG. 8 shows the chunking component 815 at file system 810, the system may locate the chunking component at the device driver 830, at an intermediate component, or other locations. In some cases, the system may utilize the chunking component 815 to divide data already in secondary storage into chunks. For example, a data storage system may retrieve data objects under management that were transferred to secondary storage using file-based data migration, divide the data objects into two or more chunks, and migrate the data objects based to storage using the chunk-based data migration discussed herein. Thus, future restoration of the data objects may be faster and easier because the data objects are divided into chunks.


Referring to FIG. 9, a flow diagram illustrating a routine 900 for performing chunk-level data migration is shown. In step 910, the system identifies chunks of data blocks within a data store that satisfy one or more criteria. The data store may store large files (>50 MB), such as databases associated with a file system, SQL databases, Microsoft Exchange mailboxes, virtual machine files, and so on. The system may compare some or all of the chunks (or, information associated with the chunks) of the data store with predetermined and/or dynamic criteria. The predetermined criteria may be time-based criteria within a storage policy or data retention policy. The system may review an index with the chunking component 815 when comparing the chunks with applicable criteria.


In step 920, the system transfers data within the identified chunks from the data store to a media agent, to be stored in a different data store. The system may perform some or all of the processes described with respect to FIGS. 1-3 when transferring the data to the media agent. For example, the system may review a storage policy assigned to the data store and select a media agent based on instructions within the storage policy. In step 925, the system optionally updates an allocation table, such as a file allocation table (FAT) for a file system associated with the data store, to indicate the data blocks that no longer contain data and are now free to receive and store data from the file system.


In some examples, the system monitors the transfer of data from the file system to the data store via the callback layer 820. The callback layer 820 may be a layer, or additional file system, that resides on top of the file system 810. The intermediate layer 820 may intercept data requests from the file system 810, in order to identify, track and/or monitor the chunks requested by the file system 810 and store information associated with these requests in a data structure, such as a bitmap similar to the one shown in Table 1. Thus, the intermediate layer 820 stores information identifying when chunks are accessed by tracking calls from the file system 810 to the data store 840. For example, Table 3 provides entry information for a bitmap tracking calls to a data store:












TABLE 3







Chunk of File1
Access Time









File1.1
09.05.2008 @12:00



File1.2
09.05.2008 @12:30



File1.3
09.05.2008 @13:30



File1.4
06.04.2008 @12:30










In this example, the file system 810 creates a data object named “File1,” using the chunking component to divide the file into four chunks: “File1.1,” “File1.2,” “File1.3,” and “File1.4.” The file system 810 stores the four chunks to data store 840 on 06.04.2008. According to the table, the file system has not accessed File1.4 since its creation, and most recently accessed the other chunks on Sep. 5, 2008. Of course, Table 3 may include other or different information, such as information identifying a location of the chunks, information identifying the type of media storing the chunks, information identifying the blocks within the chunk, and/or other information or metadata.


In step 930, via the media agent, the system stores the data from the chunks to a different data store. In some cases, the system, via the media agent, stores the data to a secondary storage device, such as a magnetic tape or optical disk. For example, the system may store the data in secondary copies of the data store, such as a backup copy, and archive copy, and so on. In some cases, the system stores the data to a storage device located near and/or associated with the data store, such as to a quick recovery volume.


Data Recovery


The system, using the block-based or chunk-based data migration processes described herein, is able to restore portions of files instead of entire files, such as individual blocks or chunks that comprise portions of the files. Referring to FIG. 10, a flow diagram illustrating a routine 1000 for block-based or chunk-based data restoration and modification is shown. In step 1010, the system, via a restore or data recovery component, receives a request to modify a file located in a data store. For example, a user submits a request to a file system to provide an old copy of a large Powerpoint presentation so the user can modify a picture located on slide 5 of 300 of the presentation. For example, the data recovery component 410 works with the file system 417 and the data store 430.


In step 1020, the system identifies one or more blocks or one or more chunks associated with the request. For example, the system looks to a table similar to Table 2, and identifies blocks associated with page 5 of the presentation and blocks associated with an table of contents of the presentation.


In step 1030, the system retrieves the identified blocks or chunks and presents them to the user. For example, the system only retrieves page 5 and table of contents of the presentation and presents the pages to the user.


In step 1040, the system, via the file system, modifies the retrieved blocks or chunks via the file system. For example, the user updates the Powerpoint presentation to include a different picture. In step 1050, the system transfers data associated with the modified blocks or chunks to the data store. For example, the system transfers the modified page 5 to the data store. The system may also update a table that tracks access to the data store, such as Table 1 or Table 3.


Thus, the system, leveraging block-based or chunk-based data migration during data storage, restores only portions of data objects required by a file system. Such restoration can be, among other benefits, advantageous over systems that perform file-based restoration, because those systems restore entire files, which can be expensive, time consuming, and so on. Some files, such as .pst files, may contain large amounts of data. File-based restoration can therefore be inconvenient and cumbersome, among other things, especially when a user only requires a small portion of a large file.


For example, a user submits a request to the system to retrieve an old email stored in a secondary copy on removable media. The system identifies a portion of a .pst file associated with the user that contains a list of old emails, and retrieves the list. That is, the system has knowledge of the chunk that includes the list (e.g., a chunking component may always include the list in a first chunk of a data object), accesses the chunk, and retrieves the list. The other portions (e.g., all the emails with the .pst file), are not retrieved from media. The user selects the desired email from the list. The system, via an index that associates chunks with data (such as an index similar to Table 2), identifies the chunk that contains the email, and retrieves the chunk for presentation to the user. The index may include information about the chunks, information about the data objects (such as file formats, database schemas, application specific information, and so on).


Thus, the system is able to restore the email without restoring the entire mailbox (.pst file) associated with the user. That is, although an entire data object is in storage, the system is able to retrieve a portion of the entire data object by leveraging the processes described herein.


Conclusion


From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific examples of the data recovery system have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the system. For example, although files have been described, other types of content such as user settings, application data, emails, and other data objects can be imaged by snapshots. Accordingly, the system is not limited except as by the appended claims.


Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” The word “coupled”, as generally used herein, refers to two or more elements that may be either directly connected, or connected by way of one or more intermediate elements. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or” in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.


The above detailed description of embodiments of the system is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the system to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the system are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the system, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified. Each of these processes or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times.


The teachings of the system provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.


These and other changes can be made to the system in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description details certain embodiments of the system and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the system can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system may vary considerably in implementation details, while still being encompassed by the system disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the system should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the system with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the system to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the system encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the system under the claims.


While certain aspects of the system are presented below in certain claim forms, the applicant contemplates the various aspects of the system in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the system is recited as a means-plus-function claim under 35 U.S.C sec. 112, sixth paragraph, other aspects may likewise be embodied as a means-plus-function claim, or in other forms, such as being embodied in a computer-readable medium. (Any claims intended to be treated under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶6 will begin with the words “means for”.) Accordingly, the applicant reserves the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the system.

Claims
  • 1. At least one non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions, which when executed by at least one data processor, enable restoration from secondary storage of a portion of a file in a data storage system, comprising: receiving, via a user interface associated with a file system, a request from a user to modify a portion of a file in the file system, wherein the file is partially stored in secondary storage on a second storage device that is distinct from a first storage device storing the file system;identifying one or more data blocks within the second storage device that contain data associated with the portion of the file requested to be modified;retrieving from the second storage device the one or more data blocks without retrieving data blocks therefrom that are not associated with the portion of the file requested to be modified;presenting to the user data contained by the one or more data blocks retrieved from the second storage device, via the user interface associated with the file system;upon receiving input from the user to modify the portion of the file, transferring data associated with the received input for storage by one of the first storage device and the second storage device; andmaintaining a data structure in a memory of an intermediate component that resides between the file system and the second storage device, wherein the data structure reflects information about changes to the file, including information about data blocks that were changed by the received input to modify the portion of the file.
  • 2. The at least one non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the data structure comprises one or more of: a bitmap, a table, and a log.
  • 3. The at least one non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the identified one or more data blocks are a proper subset of a set of data blocks that contain file data.
  • 4. The at least one non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the identifying one or more data blocks identifies one or more chunks within the second storage device.
  • 5. The at least one non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, further comprising: dividing data already stored in the second storage device into subsets of data based on logical divisions including one or more of: a date of creation, a date of deletion, a date of reception, and a size of data to be divided; andupdating an index associated with the file to include information associating the identified one or more data blocks with the second storage device.
  • 6. A method in a data storage system for restoring a portion of a file, the method comprising: receiving, via a user interface associated with a file system that comprises a file, a request from a user to modify only a portion of the file in the file system, wherein the file is partially stored in secondary storage on a second storage device that is distinct from a first storage device storing the file system;determining one or more data blocks stored within the second storage device that contain data associated with the portion of the file requested to be modified;retrieving from the second storage device the one or more data blocks that contain data associated with the portion of the file requested to be modified without retrieving data blocks therefrom that are not associated with the portion of the file requested to be modified;in response to the request, presenting to the user via the user interface associated with the file system one or more data blocks retrieved from the second storage device;upon receiving input from the user, via the user interface, to modify the portion of the file, transferring data blocks that were changed by the received input for storage by one of the first storage device and the second storage device; andmaintaining a data structure in a memory of an intermediate component that resides between the file system and the second storage device, wherein the data structure reflects information about changes to the file, including information about data blocks that were changed by the received input to modify the portion of the file.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the data structure at the intermediate component comprises a bitmap.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the identified one or more data blocks are a proper subset of a set of data blocks that contain file data.
  • 9. The method of claim 6, wherein the identifying one or more data blocks identifies one or more chunks within the second storage device.
  • 10. The method of claim 6, further comprising: dividing data already stored in the second storage device into subsets of data based on logical divisions including one or more of: a date of creation, a date of deletion, a date of reception, and a size of data to be divided; andupdating an index associated with the file to include information associating the identified one or more data blocks with the storage device.
  • 11. A system for restoring a portion of a file, the system comprising: at least one processor;means, at a file system, for receiving a request from a user to modify only a portion of a file in the file system, wherein the file is partially stored in secondary storage on a second storage device that is distinct from a first storage device storing the file system;means for identifying one or more data blocks stored within the second storage device that contain data associated with the portion of the file requested to be modified;means for retrieving from the second storage device the one or more data blocks without retrieving data blocks therefrom that are not associated with the portion of the file requested to be modified;means for presenting in a user interface the portion of the file requested to be modified, including the data blocks retrieved from the second storage device;means for transferring data blocks that were changed by input received from the user to modify the portion of the file, for storage by one or more of the first storage device and the second storage device; andmeans for maintaining a data structure in a memory of an intermediate component that resides between the file system and the second storage device, wherein the data structure reflects information about changes to the file, including information about data blocks that were changed by the input to modify the portion of the file.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the identified one or more data blocks are a proper subset of a set of data blocks that contain file data.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the means for identifying one or more data blocks identifies one or more chunks within the second storage device.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the data structure is configured as a bitmap.
  • 15. The system of claim 11, further comprising: means for dividing data already stored in the second storage device into subsets of data based on logical divisions including one or more of: a date of creation, a date of deletion, a date of reception, and a size of data to be divided; andmeans for updating an index associated with the file to include information associating the identified one or more data blocks with the second storage device.
  • 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the file is a slide presentation and wherein the data contained by the identified one or more data blocks includes data associated with a single slide of the slide presentation.
  • 17. The system of claim 11, wherein the file is a .pst file for an email mailbox associated with the user and wherein the identified one or more data blocks comprise one or more emails within the .pst file.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/553,199, filed Sep. 3, 2009, entitled TRANSFERRING OR MIGRATING PORTIONS OF DATA OBJECTS, SUCH AS BLOCK-LEVEL DATA MIGRATION OR CHUNK-BASED DATA MIGRATION, which claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 61/096,587, filed on Sep. 12, 2008, entitled TRANSFERRING OR MIGRATING PORTIONS OF DATA OBJECTS, SUCH AS BLOCK-LEVEL DATA MIGRATION OR CHUNK-BASED DATA MIGRATION, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (322)
Number Name Date Kind
4464122 Fuller et al. Aug 1984 A
4686620 Ng Aug 1987 A
4995035 Cole et al. Feb 1991 A
5005122 Griffin et al. Apr 1991 A
5093912 Dong et al. Mar 1992 A
5133065 Cheffetz et al. Jul 1992 A
5193154 Kitajima et al. Mar 1993 A
5212772 Masters May 1993 A
5212784 Sparks May 1993 A
5226157 Nakano et al. Jul 1993 A
5239647 Anglin et al. Aug 1993 A
5241668 Eastridge et al. Aug 1993 A
5241670 Eastridge et al. Aug 1993 A
5276860 Fortier et al. Jan 1994 A
5276867 Kenley et al. Jan 1994 A
5287500 Stoppani, Jr. Feb 1994 A
5321816 Rogan et al. Jun 1994 A
5333315 Saether et al. Jul 1994 A
5347653 Flynn et al. Sep 1994 A
5386545 Gombos, Jr. et al. Jan 1995 A
5410700 Fecteau et al. Apr 1995 A
5448718 Cohn et al. Sep 1995 A
5448724 Hayashi Sep 1995 A
5485606 Midgdey et al. Jan 1996 A
5491810 Allen Feb 1996 A
5495607 Pisello et al. Feb 1996 A
5504873 Martin et al. Apr 1996 A
5517405 McAndrew et al. May 1996 A
5537568 Yanai et al. Jul 1996 A
5544345 Carpenter et al. Aug 1996 A
5544347 Yanai et al. Aug 1996 A
5555371 Duyanovich et al. Sep 1996 A
5559957 Balk Sep 1996 A
5564037 Lam Oct 1996 A
5608865 Midgely et al. Mar 1997 A
5613134 Lucus et al. Mar 1997 A
5619644 Crockett et al. Apr 1997 A
5634052 Morris May 1997 A
5638509 Dunphy et al. Jun 1997 A
5659614 Bailey, III Aug 1997 A
5666501 Jones et al. Sep 1997 A
5673381 Huai et al. Sep 1997 A
5673382 Cannon et al. Sep 1997 A
5699361 Ding et al. Dec 1997 A
5729743 Squibb Mar 1998 A
5740405 DeGraaf Apr 1998 A
5751997 Kullick et al. May 1998 A
5758359 Saxon May 1998 A
5758649 Iwashita et al. Jun 1998 A
5761677 Senator et al. Jun 1998 A
5764972 Crouse et al. Jun 1998 A
5778165 Saxon Jul 1998 A
5778395 Whiting et al. Jul 1998 A
5812398 Nielsen Sep 1998 A
5813009 Johnson et al. Sep 1998 A
5813017 Morris Sep 1998 A
5860073 Ferrel et al. Jan 1999 A
5864846 Voorhees et al. Jan 1999 A
5875478 Blumenau Feb 1999 A
5887134 Ebrahim Mar 1999 A
5896531 Curtis et al. Apr 1999 A
5901327 Ofek May 1999 A
5924102 Perks Jul 1999 A
5950205 Aviani, Jr. Sep 1999 A
5974563 Beeler, Jr. Oct 1999 A
5983239 Cannon Nov 1999 A
5991753 Wilde Nov 1999 A
6012053 Pant et al. Jan 2000 A
6021415 Cannon et al. Feb 2000 A
6026414 Anglin Feb 2000 A
6052735 Ulrich et al. Apr 2000 A
6064821 Shough et al. May 2000 A
6073128 Pongracz et al. Jun 2000 A
6076148 Kedem Jun 2000 A
6091518 Anabuki et al. Jul 2000 A
6094416 Ying Jul 2000 A
6131095 Low et al. Oct 2000 A
6131190 Sidwell Oct 2000 A
6148412 Cannon et al. Nov 2000 A
6154787 Urevig et al. Nov 2000 A
6161111 Mutalik et al. Dec 2000 A
6167402 Yeager Dec 2000 A
6182198 Hubis et al. Jan 2001 B1
6212512 Barney et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226759 Miller et al. May 2001 B1
6239800 Mayhew et al. May 2001 B1
6253217 Dourish et al. Jun 2001 B1
6260069 Anglin Jul 2001 B1
6266679 Szalwinski et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266784 Hsiao et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269431 Dunham Jul 2001 B1
6275953 Vahalia et al. Aug 2001 B1
6298439 Beglin Oct 2001 B1
6301592 Aoyama et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308175 Lang et al. Oct 2001 B1
6324581 Xu et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327590 Chidlovskii et al. Dec 2001 B1
6327612 Watanabe et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328766 Long Dec 2001 B1
6330570 Crighton Dec 2001 B1
6330642 Carteau Dec 2001 B1
6341287 Sziklai Jan 2002 B1
6343287 Kumar et al. Jan 2002 B1
6343324 Hubis et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345288 Reed et al. Feb 2002 B1
RE37601 Eastridge et al. Mar 2002 E
6356801 Goodman et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363462 Bergsten Mar 2002 B1
6367073 Elledge Apr 2002 B2
6374363 Wu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389432 Pothapragada et al. May 2002 B1
6418478 Ignatius et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421678 Smiga et al. Jul 2002 B2
6421711 Blumenau et al. Jul 2002 B1
6442706 Wahl et al. Aug 2002 B1
6470332 Weschler Oct 2002 B1
6484162 Edlund et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487561 Ofek et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487644 Huebsch et al. Nov 2002 B1
6502205 Yanai et al. Dec 2002 B1
6519679 Devireddy et al. Feb 2003 B2
6538669 Lagueux, Jr. et al. Mar 2003 B1
6540623 Jackson Apr 2003 B2
6549918 Probert, Jr. et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557039 Leong et al. Apr 2003 B1
6564228 O'Connor May 2003 B1
6593656 Ahn et al. Jul 2003 B2
6618771 Leja et al. Sep 2003 B1
6629110 Cane et al. Sep 2003 B2
6647399 Zaremba Nov 2003 B2
6658526 Nguyen et al. Dec 2003 B2
6662218 Mighdoll et al. Dec 2003 B2
6675177 Webb Jan 2004 B1
6691232 Wood et al. Feb 2004 B1
6721767 De Meno et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732088 Glance May 2004 B1
6732231 Don et al. May 2004 B1
6732244 Ashton et al. May 2004 B2
6745178 Goldring Jun 2004 B1
6795828 Ricketts Sep 2004 B2
6816941 Carlson et al. Nov 2004 B1
6820070 Goldman et al. Nov 2004 B2
6839741 Tsai Jan 2005 B1
6839803 Loh et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850994 Gabryjelski Feb 2005 B2
6860422 Hull et al. Mar 2005 B2
6865568 Chau Mar 2005 B2
6871182 Winnard et al. Mar 2005 B1
6892221 Ricart et al. May 2005 B2
6948038 Berkowitz et al. Sep 2005 B2
6948039 Biessener et al. Sep 2005 B2
6957186 Guheen et al. Oct 2005 B1
6970997 Shibayama et al. Nov 2005 B2
6976039 Chefalas et al. Dec 2005 B2
6995675 Curkendall et al. Feb 2006 B2
6996616 Leighton et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003641 Prahlad et al. Feb 2006 B2
7028079 Mastrianni et al. Apr 2006 B2
7035880 Crescenti et al. Apr 2006 B1
7039860 Gautestad et al. May 2006 B1
7054960 Bezbaruah May 2006 B1
7058661 Ciaramitaro et al. Jun 2006 B2
7099901 Sutoh et al. Aug 2006 B2
7107298 Prahlad et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107416 Stuart et al. Sep 2006 B2
7133870 Tripp et al. Nov 2006 B1
7139826 Watanabe et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139846 Rossi Nov 2006 B1
7146387 Russo et al. Dec 2006 B1
7155421 Haldar Dec 2006 B1
7155481 Prahlad et al. Dec 2006 B2
7159081 Suzuki Jan 2007 B2
7171468 Yeung et al. Jan 2007 B2
7171585 Gail et al. Jan 2007 B2
7185152 Takahashi et al. Feb 2007 B2
7188141 Novaes Mar 2007 B2
7240100 Wein et al. Jul 2007 B1
7246207 Kottomtharayil et al. Jul 2007 B2
7269664 Hutsch et al. Sep 2007 B2
7284033 Jhanji Oct 2007 B2
7287047 Kavuri Oct 2007 B2
7290017 Wang et al. Oct 2007 B1
7313659 Suzuki Dec 2007 B2
7315923 Retnamma et al. Jan 2008 B2
7328325 Solis et al. Feb 2008 B1
7343453 Prahlad et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346623 Prahlad et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346676 Swildens et al. Mar 2008 B1
7346751 Prahlad et al. Mar 2008 B2
7376947 Evers May 2008 B2
7379978 Anderson et al. May 2008 B2
7383379 Patterson et al. Jun 2008 B2
7386535 Kalucha et al. Jun 2008 B1
7395282 Crescenti et al. Jul 2008 B1
7421460 Chigusa et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424543 Rice, III Sep 2008 B2
7434219 De Meno et al. Oct 2008 B2
7457790 Kochunni et al. Nov 2008 B2
7472142 Prahlad et al. Dec 2008 B2
7496841 Hadfield et al. Feb 2009 B2
7529782 Prahlad et al. May 2009 B2
7565484 Ghosal et al. Jul 2009 B2
7577689 Masinter et al. Aug 2009 B1
7577694 Nakano et al. Aug 2009 B2
7584469 Mitekura et al. Sep 2009 B2
7587715 Barrett et al. Sep 2009 B1
7593935 Sullivan Sep 2009 B2
7596713 Mani-Meitav et al. Sep 2009 B2
7603626 Williams et al. Oct 2009 B2
7606844 Kottomtharayil Oct 2009 B2
7610285 Zoellner et al. Oct 2009 B1
7617262 Prahlad et al. Nov 2009 B2
7668884 Prahlad et al. Feb 2010 B2
7673175 Mora et al. Mar 2010 B2
7676542 Moser et al. Mar 2010 B2
7689899 Leymaster et al. Mar 2010 B2
7730031 Forster Jun 2010 B2
7734593 Prahlad et al. Jun 2010 B2
7734669 Kottomtharayil et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747579 Prahlad et al. Jun 2010 B2
7751628 Reisman Jul 2010 B1
7761409 Stefik et al. Jul 2010 B2
7792789 Prahlad et al. Sep 2010 B2
7801871 Gosnell Sep 2010 B2
7814118 Kottomtharayil et al. Oct 2010 B2
7827266 Gupta Nov 2010 B2
7831793 Chakravarty et al. Nov 2010 B2
7840537 Gokhale et al. Nov 2010 B2
7844676 Prahlad et al. Nov 2010 B2
7865517 Prahlad et al. Jan 2011 B2
7882077 Gokhale et al. Feb 2011 B2
7882093 Kottomtharayil et al. Feb 2011 B2
7882097 Ogilvie Feb 2011 B1
7937393 Prahlad et al. May 2011 B2
7937420 Tabellion et al. May 2011 B2
7937702 De Meno et al. May 2011 B2
7984063 Kottomtharayil et al. Jul 2011 B2
8037028 Prahlad et al. Oct 2011 B2
8055627 Prahlad et al. Nov 2011 B2
8060514 Arrouye et al. Nov 2011 B2
8078607 Oztekin et al. Dec 2011 B2
8099428 Kottomtharayil et al. Jan 2012 B2
8108427 Prahlad et al. Jan 2012 B2
8117173 Gurevich Feb 2012 B2
8140786 Bunte et al. Mar 2012 B2
8156086 Lu et al. Apr 2012 B2
8161003 Kavuri Apr 2012 B2
8170995 Prahlad et al. May 2012 B2
8219524 Gokhale Jul 2012 B2
8229954 Kottomtharayil et al. Jul 2012 B2
8230195 Amarendran et al. Jul 2012 B2
RE43678 Major et al. Sep 2012 E
8285681 Prahlad et al. Oct 2012 B2
8352954 Gokhale et al. Jan 2013 B2
8364652 Vijayan et al. Jan 2013 B2
8578120 Attarde et al. Nov 2013 B2
20020032878 Karpf Mar 2002 A1
20020049883 Schneider et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020120858 Porter et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030046313 Leung et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050979 Takahashi Mar 2003 A1
20030101086 San Miguel May 2003 A1
20040039689 Penney et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040220980 Forster Nov 2004 A1
20040267815 De Mes Dec 2004 A1
20050039069 Prahlad et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050091346 Krishnaswami Apr 2005 A1
20050097070 Enis et al. May 2005 A1
20050251786 Citron et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278207 Ronnewinkel Dec 2005 A1
20060036619 Fuerst et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060070061 Cox et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060115802 Reynolds Jun 2006 A1
20060116999 Dettinger et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149604 Miller Jul 2006 A1
20060149724 Ritter et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060224846 Amarendran et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060265396 Raman et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282900 Johnson et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070022145 Kavuri Jan 2007 A1
20070028229 Knatcher Feb 2007 A1
20070043715 Kaushik et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070061266 Moore et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061298 Wilson et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070136541 Herz et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156783 Zbogar-Smith et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070166674 Kochunni et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185915 Prahlad et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208788 Chakravarty Sep 2007 A1
20070214330 Minami Sep 2007 A1
20070226320 Hager et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070250810 Tittizer et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070296258 Calvert et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080126302 Mora et al. May 2008 A1
20080282048 Miura Nov 2008 A1
20080288947 Gokhale et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288948 Attarde et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080320319 Muller et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090171883 Kochunni et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090319534 Gokhale Dec 2009 A1
20090320029 Kottomtharayil Dec 2009 A1
20090320033 Gokhale et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100005259 Prahlad Jan 2010 A1
20100031017 Gokhale et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100070466 Prahlad et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070474 Lad Mar 2010 A1
20100070725 Prahlad et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070726 Ngo et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076932 Lad Mar 2010 A1
20100114837 Prahlad et al. May 2010 A1
20100332456 Prahlad et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110093471 Brockway et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110138225 Gunabalasubramaniam et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110173171 De Meno et al. Jul 2011 A1
20120036108 Prahlad et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120150818 Vijayan Retnamma et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120150826 Vijayan Retnamma et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120254119 Kumarasamy et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265754 Kottomtharayil et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120317085 Green et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130145376 Gokhale et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130262410 Liu et al. Oct 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
0259912 Mar 1988 EP
0405926 Jan 1991 EP
0467546 Jan 1992 EP
0774715 May 1997 EP
0809184 Nov 1997 EP
0899662 Mar 1999 EP
0910019 Apr 1999 EP
0981090 Feb 2000 EP
0986011 Mar 2000 EP
1035690 Sep 2000 EP
2216368 Oct 1989 GB
07-046271 Feb 1995 JP
7073080 Mar 1995 JP
8044598 Feb 1996 JP
2000035969 Feb 2000 JP
2003531435 Oct 2003 JP
WO-9513580 May 1995 WO
WO-9912098 Mar 1999 WO
WO-0058865 Oct 2000 WO
WO-0106368 Jan 2001 WO
WO-0116693 Mar 2001 WO
WO-0180005 Oct 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (25)
Entry
Hirofuchi, Takahiro, et al. “A live storage migration mechanism over wan for relocatable virtual machine services on clouds.” Proceedings of the 2009 9th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid. IEEE Computer Society, 2009.
Cao, Lin, et al. “Hybrid caching for cloud storage to support traditional application.” 2012 IEEE Asia Pacific Cloud Computing Congress (APCloudCC). IEEE, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/609,977, Prahlad.
Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary Third Edition, “Data Compression,” Microsoft Press, 1997, p. 130.
Hennessy et al., “Computer Architecture—A Quantitative Approach”, 2nd Edition, 1996, pp. 246-250.
Veeravalli, B., “Network Caching Strategies for a Shared Data Distribution for a Predefined Service Demand Sequence,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 15, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2003, pp. 1487-1497.
Armstead et al., “Implementation of a Campwide Distributed Mass Storage Service: The Dream vs. Reality,” IEEE, Sep. 11-14, 1995, pp. 190-199.
Arneson, “Mass Storage Archiving in Network Environments,” Digest of Papers, Ninth IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, Oct. 31, 1988-Nov. 3, 1988, pp. 45-50, Monterey, CA.
Cabrera et al., “ADSM: A Multi-Platform, Scalable, Backup and Archive Mass Storage System,” Digest of Papers, Compcon '95, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Computer Society International Conference, Mar. 5, 1995-Mar. 9, 1995, pp. 420-427, San Francisco, CA.
Eitel, “Backup and Storage Management in Distributed Heterogeneous Environments,” IEEE, Jun. 12-16, 1994, pp. 124-126.
Jander, M., “Launching Storage-Area Net,” Data Communications, US, McGraw Hill, NY, vol. 27, No. 4 (Mar. 21, 1998), pp. 64-72.
Gait, J., “The Optical File Cabinet: A Random-Access File System for Write-Once Optical Disks,” IEEE Computer, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 11-22 (Jun. 1988).
Rosenblum et al., “The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structured File System,” Operating Systems Review SIGOPS, vol. 25, No. 5, New York, US, pp. 1-15 (May 1991).
Hutchinson, Norman C., et al. “Logical vs. physical file system backup.” OSDI. vol. 99. 1999.
Matthews, Jeanna, et al. “Data protection and rapid recovery from attack with a virtual private file server and virtual machine appliances.” Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Communication, Network and Information Security (CNIS 2005). 2005.
Wu, Chin-Hsien, Tei-Wei Kuo, and Li-Pin Chang. “Efficient initialization and crash recovery for log-based file systems over flash memory.” Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing. ACM, 2006.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 09767119, dated Feb. 11, 2013, 12 pages.
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US09/32325, dated Mar. 17, 2009, 11 pages.
Pitoura et al., “Locating Objects in Mobile Computing”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 13, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2001, pp. 571-592.
Rowe et al., “Indexes for User Access to Large Video Databases”, Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases II, IS,& T/SPIE Symp. on Elec. Imaging Sci. & Tech., Feb. 1994, pp. 1-12.
“Multi Instancing,” retrieved from http://documentation.commvault.com/hds/release_8_0_0/books_online_1/english_us/deployment/install/misc/multi_instancing.htm[Feb. 18, 2014 11:57:19 AM] on Feb. 18, 2014, 3 pages.
Hutchinson, Norman C., et al. “Logical vs. physical file system backup.” OSDI. vol. 99. 1999, 12 pages.
Matthews, Jeanna, et al. “Data protection and rapid recovery from attack with a virtual private file server and virtual machine appliances.” Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Communication, Network and Information Security (CNIS 2005). 2005, 14 pages.
Quinlan, Sean. “A cached worm file system.” Software: Practice and Experience 21.12 (1991 ): 1289-1299.
Wu, Chin-Hsien, Tei-Wei Kuo, and Li-Pin Chang. “Efficient initialization and crash recovery for log-based file systems over flash memory.” Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing. ACM, 2006, 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140108470 A1 Apr 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61096587 Sep 2008 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12553199 Sep 2009 US
Child 14132458 US