Transformers with multi-turn primary windings for dynamic power flow control

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10424929
  • Patent Number
    10,424,929
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, May 9, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 24, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
Active impedance-injection module enabled for distributed power flow control of high-voltage (HV) transmission lines is disclosed. The module uses transformers with multi-turn primary windings, series-connected to high-voltage power lines, to dynamically control power flow on those power lines. The insertion of the transformer multi-turn primary is by cutting the line and splicing the two ends of the winding to the ends of the cut high-voltage transmission line. The secondary winding of the transformer is connected to a control circuit and a converter/inverter circuit that is able to generate inductive and capacitive impedance based on the status of the transmission line. The module operates by extracting power from the HV transmission line with the module floating at the HV transmission-line potential. High-voltage insulators are typically used to suspend the module from transmission towers, or intermediate support structures. It may also be directly suspended from the HV transmission line.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to systems and methods for dynamic line balancing of high-voltage (HV) transmission lines using spatially distributed active impedance injection modules that are connected directly in series with the HV transmission lines that form the HV electric power grid.


2. Prior Art


HV electric power grids typically operate at voltages that are on the order of about 50 kV up to about 600 kV. One of the requirements of these HV power grids is the need for dynamic distributed active power-flow control capability that can inject both inductive and capacitive impedance on to the HV transmission line as required to achieve line balancing and phase angle correction. A system that can react fast to the problems of power flow over the grid will greatly improve the grid operation and power-transfer efficiency.


Congested networks limit system reliability and increase the cost of power delivery by having part of the power dissipated in unbalanced circuits causing loop currents with associated power loss. In addition, substantially out-of-phase voltages and currents on the transmission lines reduce the capacity of the lines to transfer real power from the generator to the distribution substation. To remove this limitation, it is desired to have HV power grids with transmission lines that are balanced, with power transfer shared substantially per optimization methods, with reasonable power factor, and controllable phase difference between voltage and currents. These improvements reduce the loop currents and associated losses and enable real power transfer over the grid up to the capacity of the lines.


Most of the grid control capabilities today are ground based and installed at substations with switchable inductive and capacitive loads. These installations require high-voltage insulation and high-current switching capabilities. Being at the substations these can use methods of cooling that include oil cooling, forced recirculation of coolant, and other options without consideration of the weight and size of the units. These lumped controls require a centralized data collection and control facility to coordinate operation across the grid and hence have associated delays in implementing the control function on the power grid.


Distributed and active control of transmission line impedance, if effectively implemented with high reliability, improves the system efficiency substantially, but requires cost-effective implementations that can alter the impedance of the HV transmission lines, with fast identification and fast response to line-balance issues, by changing the phase angle of the current-voltage relationship applied across the line, thus controlling power flow.


At present proven effective and reliable solutions for distributed control of the power grid as, for example, described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,835,128 to Divan et al (the '128 patent) are limited. FIG. 1 shows a representation of the present-day distributed line balancing system 102 using a “distributed series reactor (DSR)” 100 using a passive impedance-injection module.


Power is transmitted from the electric power source or generator 104 to the load or distribution substation 106. Spatially distributed passive inductive impedance injection modules or DSR 100) are directly attached to the power conductor on the HV transmission line 108, and hence form the primary winding of the DSR 100 with a secondary winding having a bypass switch that, when open, inject an inductive impedance on to the line for distributed control. These DSR 100s only provide a limited amount of control by injecting only the inductive impedance on to the line. When the secondary winding is shorted by the bypass switch, the DSR 100 is in a protection mode and injects substantially zero impedance on to the HV line.



FIGS. 2 and 2A and 2B show embodiments of a passive impedance injection module DSR 100. The HV transmission line 108 is incorporated into the module as the primary winding by adding two split-core sections 132 that are assembled around the HV transmission line 108. The core sections 132 are attached to the HV transmission line 108 with an air gap 138 separating the sections after assembly. The air gap 138 is used to set a maximum value of fixed inductive impedance that is to be injected on the HV line via the primary winding. Secondary winding 134 and 136 encircles the two split-core sections 132 and enables the bypass switch 122 to short out the secondary winding and prevents injection of inductive impedance on to the a HV transmission line 108 and also provides protection to the secondary circuits when power surges occur on the HV transmission line. The split core sections 132 and the windings 134 and 136 comprise the single-turn transformer (STT) 120. A power supply module 128 derives power from the secondary windings 134&136 of the STT 120 either via the series-connected current transformer winding 126 or via the alternate parallel-connected winding. The power supply 128 provides power to a controller 130. The controller 130 monitors the line current via the secondary current of the STT 120, and turns the bypass switch 122 off when the line current reaches and exceeds a predetermined level. With the contact switch 122 open, a thyristor 124 may be used to control the injected inductive impedance to a value up to the maximum set by the air gap 138 of DSR 100.


When using multiple DSRs 100 connected on the HV transmission line as in FIG. 1, the inductive impedance injected by all the DSRs 100 on the line segments provides the total control impedance. The main reason for the choice and use of inductive impedance injection unit DSR 100 is its simplicity, inexpensiveness, and reliability, as it does not need active electronic circuits to generate the needed inductive impedance. The value of the inductive impedance of each DSR 100 is provided by the air-gap setting of the transformer core and not electronically generated, and hence has fewer failure modes than if the same was implemented using electronic circuits. The difficulty in implementing and using electronic circuits for impedance injection units that can produce actively controllable high impedance for injection comprising both inductive and capacitive impedance is multi fold. It includes achieving, the long-term reliability demanded by electric utilities while generating the voltage and current levels, that are needed to achieve effective active control of the lines in the secondary circuit, while remaining within reasonable cost limits for the module.


Distributed active impedance injection modules on high-voltage transmission lines have been proposed in the past. U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,952 of Divan et al. licensed to the applicant entity is an example of such. FIG. 3 shows an exemplary schematic of an active distributed impedance injection module 300. These modules 300 are expected to be installed in the same location on the HV power line as the passive impedance injection modules (or “DSR” 100) shown FIG. 1. The active impedance injection module 300 does not perform the same functions. In fact the active impedance injection module 300 does not have a gapped core 132 of FIG. 2B that provides the fixed inductive impedance. Instead the inductive or capacitive impedance is generated using the converter 305 based on the sensed HV transmission line 108 current. Sampling the secondary current by the series-connected secondary transformer 302 does the sensing of the magnitude of the line current. The sensing and power supply block 303 connected to the secondary transformer 302 extracts the HV transmission-line current information and feeds the controller 306. The controller based on the received input provides the necessary commands to the converter 305 to generate the required inductive or capacitive impedance to adjust the line impedance. The value of the impedance in this case is not fixed but can be made to vary according to the status of the measured current on the HV transmission line. Hence the system using spatially distributed active impedance injection modules 300 provides for a much smoother and efficient method for balancing the grid.


In practice the active impedance injection modules 300s have not been practical due to reasons of cost and reliability. In order to inject the needed impedances on to the HV transmission line for providing reasonable line balancing there is a need to generate a significant amount of power in the converter circuits. This has required the active impedance injection modules 300 to use specialized devices with adequate voltages and currents ratings.


The failure of a module in a spatially distributed inductive-impedance injection-line balancing system using DSR 100 modules inserts a near-zero impedance (equal to the leakage impedance) set by the shorted secondary winding or substantially zero impedance on to the line. Failure of a few modules out of a large number distributed over the HV transmission line does not mandate the immediate shutdown of the line. The repairs or replacement of the failed modules can be undertaken at a time when the line can be brought down with minimum impact on the power flow on the grid. On the other hand, for utilities to implement distributed active line balancing, the individual modules must be extremely reliable. These also have to be cost effective to be accepted by the Utilities.


Power transmission line balancing circuits have been limited to the use of delayed-acting heavy-duty fully-insulated oil-cooled inductive and capacitive impedance injectors or phase-shifting transformers prone to single-point failures, located at substations where repairs of these failed units can be handled with out major impact on power transfer over the grid.


As described above the use the specialized devices that can handle the needed power with high reliability demanded by the utilities at a reasonable cost has not been possible so far. There is a need for such a capability for converting the grid to a more efficient and intelligent system for power distribution. If it can be established, it will have a major impact on the efficiency and capabilities of the grid.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The drawings are meant only to help distinguish the invention from the prior art. The objects, features and advantages of the invention are detailed in the description taken together with the drawings.



FIG. 1 is a representation of a high voltage transmission line showing distributed passive impedance injection modules attached directly to the HV transmission line. (Prior art)



FIG. 2 is an exemplary block diagram 200 of an inductive impedance injection module using a single turn transformer for distributed inductive impedance injection on a HV transmission line. (Prior art)



FIGS. 2A and 2B are exemplary schematics of the single turn transformer used in the passive impedance injection module of FIG. 2. (Prior Art)



FIG. 3 is an exemplary block diagram 300 of an active impedance injection module, licensed to the current entity, using a single-turn transformer for distributed active impedance injection on to a HV transmission line. (Prior Art)



FIG. 4 is an exemplary block diagram 400 of an embodiment of the disclosed active impedance injection module using multi-turn primary windings for distributed active impedance injection on a HV transmission line.



FIG. 4A is an exemplary schematics of the multi-turn primary transformer as per an embodiment of the current invention. The multiple secondary turns are deliberately not shown in order to provide a simpler drawing.



FIG. 4B shows an exemplary cross section of the multi-turn transformer of FIG. 4A.



FIG. 5 is a representation of a high voltage transmission line showing various ways the distributed active impedance injection modules are to be supported while being directly attached to the HV-transmission lines and operating at line voltage as per the embodiments of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

As discussed above there is a need to have high-reliability, fault-tolerant and intelligent distributed dynamic-control modules (distributed active impedance injection modules) with capability to inject both inductance and capacitive impedances of sufficient and appropriate magnitude on to high-voltage transmission lines to enable distributed power flow control. These distributed dynamic control modules are directly attached to the HV-Transmission line and are at line potential while in operation. The distributed dynamic control modules are enabled to operate by extracting power from the HV-Transmission line for control and for generating the necessary voltages to be impressed on the High Voltage (HV) transmission line. The modules generate voltages at the right phase angle for injection on to the HV-transmission line, through the multi-turn transformer, to provide the necessary inductive or capacitive impedance during operation.


The invention disclosed the use of the multi-turn transformer having multi-turn primary winding connected in series with the HV transmission line 108 by cutting and splicing in the winding. The secondary side of the multi-turn transformer and all associated circuitry are electrically isolated from the ground. However, one side of the secondary winding is connected to the primary winding to provide a virtual ground or “floating ground” reference and also partly to protect the secondary-side circuits form stray fields. Alternately the virtual ground 408 can be established by connecting the negative dc link of the inverter/electronic injection module to the HV transmission line. Further, both may be grounded for effective operation. Different power-electronics topologies may necessitate other grounding schemes and these schemes do not effect the key invention but, rather, are specific implementations.


In order for the distributed control modules to be successfully accepted by utilities and installed on lines, these distributed control modules have to be smart and self-aware, remotely controllable and configurable. The modules should be of a reasonable weight compared to the line segment over which these are to be installed, even where the modules are suspended in an insulated fashion from the towers or are supported by additional support structures. These should also have a low wind resistance to reduce the effect of wind loading on the line/tower/special support structure employed. As an essential feature all the electronic components and circuits of the module should have very high reliability to reduce the probability of line down times due to failure of the modules/components used therein. The splicing connection of the module to the HV transmission line also has to have high reliability.


The invention disclosed provides distributed active control having very high reliability and capability for power flow and line balancing across the multiple high-voltage transmission lines used for power transmission on the high power grid system. The invention overcomes the issues of the prior art implementations discussed and meet the criteria set for the use of the distributed control modules that are discussed below.


There are multiple requirements that have been defined for achieving the use of distributed control that need changes from the prior art implementations. These are:

    • 1. The need is to have a distributed module that can generate and supply the required range of inductive and capacitive impedances (generating the necessary leading or lagging power) to the transmission line to provide the necessary control for line balancing.
    • 2. Provide the above capability at a reasonable cost point-preferably by using standard off-the-shelf power-electronics components; this means that the secondary winding and associated circuits operate at voltages and current levels normally seen in high-volume power-electronic applications. Using off-the-shelf power-electronics components means using general-purpose power-electronics components that are also manufactured and sold in the ordinary course of business for other uses.
    • 3. The third is the need for reliability of the distributed modules to be high enough to eliminate failures and related line shut downs to an acceptable level for the Utilities—this is achievable if standard power-electronics components, with associated high reliability can be used in the secondary circuits.
    • 4. The final need is to have relatively low weight and low wind-capture cross section for the module to be attached to the HV-transmission line directly or with minimum extra support.


The disclosed invention provides for improvement in all the above aspects in the embodiments disclosed below:


The prior art dynamic injection modules had problems, which prevented their acceptance. One was the need for specialized components for the generation of the magnitude of injection power (voltage and current) to be generated to provide adequate control of the HV transmission line segment where the module is attached. The second was the lack of reliability due to the modules handling high power levels, which again necessitated specially tested and qualified component use. Both the above requirements resulted in the cost of the module also being very high for use by utilities.


The disclosed invention for increasing the impressed voltage or impedance on the transmission line uses multiple turns on the primary winding of a series-connected injection transformer. Increasing the number of turns in the primary winding alters the turns ratio of the transformer, and allows the distributed active impedance injection module (injection module) to have a greater impact. Since the primary winding of the injection transformer need to be in series with the HV transmission line, the use of additional turns of the primary winding requires the HV transmission line to be cut and the ends of the winding to be spliced in series with the HV transmission line. Further having multiple turns of heavy-duty wire, capable of carrying the line currents seen on the power grid and the use of a heavier core to provide the required coupling/flux linkage to the line, increases the weight and wind-capture cross section of the injection module. Though the injection modules are still attachable directly to the line, it is preferable to provide additional support for the heavier injection modules of the present invention due to its additional weight.


The advantages of the disclosed multi-turn primary transformer include the ability to inject higher voltages, with 90-degree lead or lag angle, providing inductive or capacitive impedances respectively, on to the HV transmission line for power flow control and grid optimization. With more turns, the transformer can also be designed such that the—power-rating-to-weight ratio (kVA per kg) of the unit can be increased, increasing the economy of the unit as well. The use of the multi-turn primary winding also allow the preferred use of non-gapped transformer core, with high-permeability core materials, thereby reducing the flux leakage and improving power transfer between the primary and secondary windings. This, and the careful selection of the number of secondary turns as a ratio of the primary turns, further reduces the dynamic secondary voltages that have to be generated for the required injection of voltages with the correct phase for line balancing. The lower voltage required to be generated across the secondary winding, to achieve the high kVA injection, due to the carefully selected ratio of the primary to secondary windings, enable high-volume power semiconductors and components to be used. The use of these semiconductors and components in the secondary circuit of the transformer (for the control module, the power converter generating the necessary leading or lagging voltages and protection circuits including the shorting switch) make the module very cost-effective. Further the use of lower voltages in the secondary circuits with associated power electronic components with sufficient voltage margins provide the necessary reliability of operation for these circuits connected across the secondary windings to satisfy the reliability requirements of the utilities for use of the distributed modules.


Further using the distributed approach, with the impedance injection modules, allows for significantly greater “N+X” system reliability, where N is the required number of distributed modules, and X is the number of extra redundant modules. Therefore, by ensuring the reliability of each unit by itself being sufficient for use by the utilities, the added extra redundant distributed active-impedance control modules provide an additional layer of “system” reliability over and above the unit reliability. The use of these distributed impedance injection modules also provide the intelligence at the point of impact, for providing fast response to any changes in the optimum characteristics of the lines while transferring power. This in turn results in a grid using distributed injection modules of high reliability, capable of providing very high system reliability, acceptable to all the utilities. The use of the distributed impedance injection modules hence are enabled to provide the best capability to balance the power transmitted over the HV-transmission-lines of the power grid.



FIG. 4 is an exemplary block diagram 400 of an implementation of the active impedance injection module (injection module) of the current invention. The injection module 400 comprises a multi-turn transformer 400A that has its primary winding 403 connected directly to the transmission line 108 by breaking the line and attaching the two ends of the primary winding 403, by splicing into the line segment as shown in FIG. 4A at 401 and 402. The primary winding 403, is in series with the HV transmission line, 108 and carries the total current carried by the transmission line, 108. In order to reduce losses due to skin effect in the conductors and thereby reduce the heating of the conductors used in the primary winding, 403 of the multi-turn transformer 400A, a ribbon conductor or continuously transported cable or a braided ribbon conductor may be used, instead of the standard conductor, for the primary winding 403, as shown in the exemplary cross section FIG. 4B of the multi-turn transformer, 400A. The ribbon/braided ribbon conductor when used, also helps to reduce the over all weight of the conductor used and hence reduce the weight of the whole injection module 400. A conductive foil may also be used instead of the standard conductor in some cases to reduce the weight and improve the current carrying capability. A non-gapped transformer core 409, of high permittivity material, is used to allow the maximum coupling possible between the primary winding 403 and the secondary winding 404 of the multi-turn transformer 400A. In this instance it is essential to have the splicing system design to be made robust to withstand the stresses that the splicing system will be subject to in the event of a utility-level fault current and to the normal thermal cycles during daily operation, to minimize the chance that splicing unit 401 and 402 failure will take down the line 108. The secondary winding 404 of the transformer couples to the primary winding 403 and is floating with respect to the primary winding. An exemplary virtual ground at the potential of the HV transmission line 108 is established by connecting one side of the secondary winding of the multi-turn transformer to the HV transmission line that enables the injection module 400 itself to be floating at high voltage of the HV transmission line 108 during operation.


A second low-voltage transformer 302 in the secondary circuit is connected to a power supply 303 within the injector module 400 that generates the necessary power required for the low-voltage electronics comprising the sensing, communication and control circuitry, all of which are lumped in the block diagram of the module as controller 406, the voltage converter 405 and the secondary winding shorting switch 304. The voltage converter or simply converter 405 may be of any appropriate design, as such devices of various designs are well known in the art. Typically such devices are configured to inject an inductive load onto the high voltage transmission line, and may also have the capability of injecting a capacitive load on the transmission for power factor control, and may further be capable of controlling harmonic content in the high-voltage transmission line. Such devices are also known by other names, such as by way of example, inverters or converters/inverters. An exemplary device of this general type is the combination of the inverter 71 and energy storage 74 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,952, though many other examples of such devices are well known. These devices typically act as active impedances to controllably impose the desired impedance onto the high-voltage transmission line. Also preferably the controller 410 used in the preferred embodiments includes a transceiver for receiving control signals and reporting on high voltage transmission line conditions, etc.


The shorting switch 304 is activated to prevent damage to the circuits connected across the secondary winding 404 during occurrence of high transients on the HV transmission line due to a short circuit or lightning strikes, or even for prolonged overloads The controller 406 has sensor circuitry for monitoring the status of the line and for triggering the protection circuits 304, and a transceiver establishing a communication capability 410 for inter-link communication and for accepting external configuration and control commands, which are used to provide additional instructions to the converter 406. The voltage converter 405 is an active voltage converter that, based on input from the controller 406, generates the necessary leading or lagging voltages of sufficient magnitude, to be impressed on the secondary winding 404 of the power line transformer of the distributed active impedance injection module 400, to be coupled to the HV transmission line 108 through the series-connected multi-turn primary winding 403 of the transformer. This injected voltage at the appropriate phase angle is able to provide the necessary impedance input capability for balancing the power transfer over the grid in a distributed fashion. The multi-turn primary 403 of the disclosed transformer 400A coupled to the HV-transmission line 108 is hence the main enabler for implementing the active distributed control of the power transfer and balancing of the grid.


The current application addresses the advantages and features of the use of multi-turn secondary windings 403 of a distributed active impedance injection module (injector module) 400 attached to the HV transmission line 108. By using a multi-turn primary winding 403 the multi-turn transformer 400A is able to impress a higher voltage on the power HV transmission line with a given transformer core size and weight while the connected circuits of the secondary winding 404 (converter 405, controller 406 and protection switch 304) of the transformer 400A are able to operate at lower voltage ranges with the proper turns ration selection, that are typical of power-electronics components commercially available. This enables a cost-effective product using standard components and devices while providing the needed high reliability to the modules and high reliability to the grid system. The use of this type of injection module 400 allows fast response to changes in loading of the HV transmission lines at or close to the point of change for dynamic control and balancing of the transmission lines. By providing the capability for injection of sufficiently large inductive and capacitive loads in line segments using reliable distributed injector modules 400, the over all system stability is also improved. The injector module 400 of the current invention is not confined to substations, as in the past, but is enabled to provide power flow control capability within existing utility right-of-way corridors in a distributed fashion. The use of multi-turn primary winding 403 also allows the typical use of non-gapped core for the transformer improving the weight and power transfer coupling of the device to the HV transmission line 108.


It should be understood that all the associated circuits of the module are enclosed in a housing, which is suspended insulated from ground at the HV transmission line voltage. Due to weight considerations it is preferable to have these modules suspended from the towers or provide additional support for their safe attachment. FIG. 5 shows the typical attachment methods 500 possible for supporting the injection modules 400 connected to the HV transmission lines 108. The on-line attachment 501, is the typical prior art attachment used for the static modules, which connects the module to the line directly, with no additional support and lets the line supports take the weight of the module and the line. Though this is acceptable, this type of attachment is not the preferred one for the injection modules 400, of the current invention. The preferred attachment for these impedance injection modules 400, distributed for line balancing over the grid system, are with additional support, directly connected by supporting insulators 502 on the HV transmission towers 510 or by using special support structures 511 with insulated supports 503 for providing the additional weight carrying capability for the distributed module. The above support methods also improve the reliability of the structures and system during extreme climatic disturbances.


Even though the invention disclosed is described using specific implementation, it is intended only to be exemplary and non-limiting. The practitioners of the art will be able to understand and modify the same based on new innovations and concepts, as they are made available. The invention is intended to encompass these modifications.


Thus the present invention has a number of aspects, which aspects may be practiced alone or in various combinations or sub-combinations, as desired. Also while certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed and described herein for purposes of exemplary illustration and not for purposes of limitation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for injecting a voltage or impedance in series with a high-voltage transmission line comprising: an injection module having; an injection transformer having a multiple-turn primary winding and a multiple-turn secondary winding on a non-gapped core, the primary winding being adapted for connection in series with the high-voltage transmission line by being directly attached to the high-voltage transmission line and by cutting the high-voltage transmission line and splicing respective ends of the primary winding in series with the high-voltage transmission line, wherein the injection transformer is suspended and insulated from ground at the high-voltage transmission line during operation;the secondary winding being connected to a converter, and having a virtual ground established at the high-voltage transmission line by connecting one end of the second winding to the high-voltage transmission line;the converter being coupled to a controller for controlling the controller; andthe secondary winding being connected across a bypass switch for providing protection to connected circuits coupled to the secondary winding.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the injection module is contained in a housing supported by the high-voltage transmission line, a transmission line tower, or a special purpose tower.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the housing is insulated from ground and is also virtually grounded to the high-voltage transmission line.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the number of turns in the primary winding is selected to reduce the operating voltage of circuitry connected to the secondary winding, and to increase the coupling to the high-voltage transmission line.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the number of turns in the secondary winding is selected to reduce the operating voltage of circuitry connected to the secondary winding and to allow use of off-the-shelf power electronic components.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the apparatus is enabled to inject any of an inductive or a capacitive impedance generated by the injection module on to the high-voltage transmission line, via the injection transformer, for line balancing and control of power transfer.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the injection module is contained in a housing, the housing being supported by the high-voltage transmission line, a transmission line tower or a special-purpose tower, the apparatus being insulated from its support.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the modules are also virtually grounded to the high-voltage transmission line.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein power for operation of the apparatus is extracted from the power transmitted over the high-voltage transmission line.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the power for operation of the apparatus is extracted from the high-voltage transmission line using a current transformer.
  • 11. An active impedance injection module for distributed dynamic line balancing and power flow control over a high-voltage grid system, the active impedance injection module comprising: a transformer having an un-gapped transformer core, the un-gapped transformer core having one or more multiple-turn primary winding and at least one multiple-turn secondary winding thereon;a converter coupled to each of the secondary windings; anda controller coupled to the converter;wherein the transformer, the converter and the controller are all housed in a single housing forming the active impedance injection module for suspending on a high-voltage power line of the grid system;wherein the active impedance injection module is suspended from the high-voltage power line by cutting the high-voltage power line into two cut ends and splicing two ends of the multiple-turn primary winding to the two cut ends of the high-voltage power line, thereby suspending the active impedance injection module on the high-voltage power line for operation and isolating the active impedance injection module from ground at a line voltage of the high-voltage power line.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/055,422 filed Feb. 26, 2016 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/264,739 filed Dec. 8, 2015, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (164)
Number Name Date Kind
2237812 De Blieux Apr 1941 A
2551841 Kepple et al. May 1951 A
3556310 Loukotsky Jan 1971 A
3704001 Sloop Nov 1972 A
3750992 Johnson Aug 1973 A
3913003 Felkel Oct 1975 A
4025824 Cheatham May 1977 A
4057736 Jeppson Nov 1977 A
4103853 Bannan Aug 1978 A
4164345 Arnold et al. Aug 1979 A
4200899 Volman et al. Apr 1980 A
4277639 Olsson Jul 1981 A
4286207 Spreadbury et al. Aug 1981 A
4323722 Winkelman Apr 1982 A
4367512 Fujita Jan 1983 A
4514950 Goodson, Jr. May 1985 A
4562360 Fujimoto Dec 1985 A
4577826 Bergstrom et al. Mar 1986 A
4710850 Jahn et al. Dec 1987 A
4821138 Nakano et al. Apr 1989 A
4903927 Farmer Feb 1990 A
5006846 Granville et al. Apr 1991 A
5023768 Collier Jun 1991 A
5032738 Vithayathil Jul 1991 A
5193774 Rogers Mar 1993 A
5461300 Kappenman Oct 1995 A
5469044 Gyugyi et al. Nov 1995 A
5513061 Gelbien et al. Apr 1996 A
5610501 Nelson et al. Mar 1997 A
5648888 Le Francois et al. Jul 1997 A
5844462 Rapoport et al. Dec 1998 A
5884886 Hageli Mar 1999 A
5886888 Akamatsu et al. Mar 1999 A
5986617 McLellan Nov 1999 A
6088249 Adamson Jul 2000 A
6134105 Lueker Oct 2000 A
6147581 Rancourt et al. Nov 2000 A
6215653 Cochran et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233137 Kolos et al. May 2001 B1
6335613 Sen et al. Jan 2002 B1
6486569 Couture Nov 2002 B2
6727604 Couture Apr 2004 B2
6831377 Yampolsky et al. Dec 2004 B2
6895373 Garcia et al. May 2005 B2
6914195 Archambault et al. Jul 2005 B2
7090176 Chavot et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091703 Folts et al. Aug 2006 B2
7105952 Divan et al. Sep 2006 B2
7193338 Ghali Mar 2007 B2
7352564 Courtney Apr 2008 B2
7460931 Jacobson Dec 2008 B2
7642757 Yoon et al. Jan 2010 B2
7688043 Toki et al. Mar 2010 B2
7834736 Johnson et al. Nov 2010 B1
7835128 Divan et al. Nov 2010 B2
7932621 Spellman Apr 2011 B1
8019484 Korba et al. Sep 2011 B2
8249836 Yoon et al. Aug 2012 B2
8270558 Dielissen Sep 2012 B2
8310099 Engel et al. Nov 2012 B2
8401709 Cherian et al. Mar 2013 B2
8441778 Ashmore May 2013 B1
8497592 Jones Jul 2013 B1
8680720 Schauder et al. Mar 2014 B2
8681479 Englert et al. Mar 2014 B2
8816527 Ramsay et al. Aug 2014 B1
8825218 Cherian et al. Sep 2014 B2
8867244 Trainer et al. Oct 2014 B2
8872366 Campion et al. Oct 2014 B2
8890373 Savolainen et al. Nov 2014 B2
8896988 Subbaiahthever et al. Nov 2014 B2
8922038 Bywaters et al. Dec 2014 B2
8957752 Sharma et al. Feb 2015 B2
8996183 Forbes, Jr. Mar 2015 B2
9099893 Schmiegel et al. Aug 2015 B2
9124100 Ukai et al. Sep 2015 B2
9124138 Mori et al. Sep 2015 B2
9130458 Crookes et al. Sep 2015 B2
9172246 Ramsay et al. Oct 2015 B2
9178456 Smith et al. Nov 2015 B2
9185000 Mabilleau et al. Nov 2015 B2
9207698 Forbes, Jr. Dec 2015 B2
9217762 Kreikebaum et al. Dec 2015 B2
9246325 Coca Figuerola et al. Jan 2016 B2
9325173 Varma et al. Apr 2016 B2
9331482 Huang May 2016 B2
9563218 Hall et al. Feb 2017 B2
9659114 He et al. May 2017 B2
9843176 Gibson et al. Dec 2017 B2
20020005668 Couture Jan 2002 A1
20020042696 Garcia et al. Apr 2002 A1
20030006652 Couture Jan 2003 A1
20030098768 Hoffmann et al. May 2003 A1
20040153215 Kearney et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040217836 Archambault et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050052801 Ghali Mar 2005 A1
20050073200 Divan Apr 2005 A1
20050194944 Folts et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205726 Chavot et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060085097 Courtney Apr 2006 A1
20070135972 Jacobson Jun 2007 A1
20070250217 Yoon et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080103737 Yoon et al. May 2008 A1
20080157728 Toki et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080177425 Korba et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080278976 Schneider et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080310069 Divan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090243876 Lilien et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090281679 Taft et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100026275 Walton Feb 2010 A1
20100177450 Holcomb et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100213765 Engel et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100302744 Englert et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110060474 Schmiegel et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110095162 Parduhn et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110106321 Cherian et al. May 2011 A1
20110172837 Forbes, Jr. Jul 2011 A1
20120105023 Schauder et al. May 2012 A1
20120146335 Bywaters et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120205981 Varma et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120242150 Ukai et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120255920 Shaw et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120293920 Subbaiahthever et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130002032 Mori et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130033103 McJunkin et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130044407 Byeon et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130094264 Crookes et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130128636 Trainer et al. May 2013 A1
20130166085 Cherian et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130169044 Stinessen et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130182355 Coca Figuerola et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130184894 Sakuma et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130200617 Smith et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130249321 Gao et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130277082 Hyde et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130345888 Forbes, Jr. Dec 2013 A1
20140008982 Powell et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025217 Jin et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032000 Chandrashekhara et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140111297 Earhart et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140129195 He et al. May 2014 A1
20140132229 Huang May 2014 A1
20140153383 Mabilleau et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188689 Kalsi et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140203640 Stinessen Jul 2014 A1
20140210213 Campion et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140246914 Chopra et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140247554 Sharma et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140266288 Trabacchin et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268458 Luciani et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140312859 Ramsay et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140327305 Ramsay et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140347158 Goeke et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150012146 Cherian et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150029764 Peng Jan 2015 A1
20150051744 Mitra Feb 2015 A1
20150184415 Bushore Jul 2015 A1
20150226772 Kreikebaum et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150244307 Cameron Aug 2015 A1
20150270689 Gibson et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160036231 Ramsay et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160036341 Jang et al. Feb 2016 A1
20170163036 Munguia et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170169928 Carrow et al. Jun 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
660094 Mar 1987 CH
103256337 Aug 2013 CN
203668968 Jun 2014 CN
2002-199563 Jul 2002 JP
2005-045888 Feb 2005 JP
2015-086692 May 2015 JP
10-1053514 Aug 2011 KR
WO-2008082820 Jul 2008 WO
WO-2014035881 Mar 2014 WO
WO-2014074956 May 2014 WO
WO-2014099876 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2015074538 May 2015 WO
WO-2015119789 Aug 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (40)
Entry
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 2, 2017; International Application No. PCT/US2016/062358”, dated Feb. 2, 2017.
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 2, 2017; International Application No. PCT/US2016/062620”, dated Feb. 2, 2017.
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 2, 2017; International Application No. PCT/US2016/061009”, dated Mar. 2, 2017.
“Invitation of the International Searching Authority to Pay Additional Fees dated Dec. 15, 2016; International Application No. PCT/US2016/061009”, Dec. 15, 2016.
“Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/069,785”, Feb. 22, 2018.
“Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/055,422”, Apr. 6, 2018.
“Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/157,726”, dated Apr. 6, 2018.
“Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,065”, Feb. 9, 2018.
“Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2017; U.S. Appl. No. 15/069,785”, Jul. 26, 2017.
“Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2017; U.S. Appl. No. 15/157,726”, Nov. 3, 2017.
Amin, S. M. et al., “Toward a Smart Grid: Power Delivery for the 21st Century”, IEEE power & energy magazine, vol. 3, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2005, pp. 34-41.
Angeladas, Emmanouil , “High Voltage Substations Overview (part 1)”, Siemens, Jan. 24, 2013, pp. 1-8.
Aquino-Lugo, Angela A. , “Distributed and Decentralized Control of the Power Grid”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010, 172 pp. total.
Dash, P. K. et al., “Digital Protection of Power Transmission Lines in the Presence of Series Connected FACTS Devices”, IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2000, pp. 1967-1972.
Divan, D. M. , “Nondissipative Switched Networks for High-Power Applications”, Electronics Letters, vol. 20, No. 7, Mar. 29, 1984, pp. 277-279.
Funato, Hirohito et al., “Realization of Negative Inductance Using Variable Active-Passive Reactance (VAPAR)”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 12, No. 4, Jul. 1997, pp. 589-596.
Gyugyi, Laszlo et al., “Status Synchronous Series Compensator: A Solid-State Approach to the Series Compensation of Transmission Lines”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 12, No. 1, Jan. 1997, pp. 406-417.
Gyugyi, Laszlo et al., “The Interline Power Flow Controller Concept: A New Approach to Power Flow Management in Transmission Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 14, No. 3, Jul. 1999, pp. 1115-1123.
Kavitha, M. et al., “Integration of FACTS into Energy Storage Systems for Future Power Systems Applications”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, vol. 2, Issue 2, Feb. 2013, pp. 800-810.
Kumbhar, Mahesh M. et al., “Smart Grid: Advanced Electricity Distribution Network”, IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), vol. 2, Issue 6, Jun. 2012, pp. 23-29.
Lambert, Frank C. , “Power Flow Control”, ISGT Europe, 2014, Istanbul, Turkey, Oct. 13, 2014, pp. 1-15.
Lehmkoster, Carsten , “Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow for an Economical Operation of FACTS-Devices in Liberalized Energy Markets”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 17, No. 2, Apr. 2002, pp. 603-608.
Mali, Bhairavanath N. et al., “Performance Study of Transmission Line Ferranti Effect and Fault Simulation Model Using MATLAB”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation and Control Engineering, vol. 4, Issue 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 49-52.
Mutale, Joseph et al., “Transmission Network Reinforcement Versus Facts: An Economic Assessment”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 15, No. 3, Aug. 2000, pp. 961-967.
Ramchurn, Sarvapali D. et al., “Putting the ‘Smarts’ into the Smart Grid: A Grand Challenge for Artificial Intelligence”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 55, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 86-97.
Reddy, D. M. et al., “FACTS Controllers Implementation in Energy Storage Systems for Advanced Power Electronic Applications—A Solution”, American Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, Issue 2, vol. 1, Jan. 2013, pp. 36-63.
Renz, B. A. et al., “AEP Unified Power Flow Controller Performance”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 14, No. 4, Oct. 1999, pp. 1374-1381.
Ribeiro, P. et al., “Energy Storage Systems”, Chapters 1-2.4 of Section entitled “Energy Storage Systems” in Electrical Engineering—vol. III, edited by Kit Po Wong, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) Publications, Dec. 13, 2009, 11 pp. total.
Schauder, C. D. et al., “Operation of the Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) Under Practical Constraints”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 13, No. 2, Apr. 1998, pp. 630-639.
Siemens Sas, “Portable Power Solutions, “Plug and play” High Voltage E-Houses, skids and mobile high voltage substations up to 420 kV”, Nov. 2015, 8 pp. total.
Swain, S. C. et al., “Design of Static Synchronous Series Compensator Based Damping Controller Employing Real Coded Genetic Algorithm”, International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering, vol. 5, No. 3, 2011, pp. 399-407.
Xue, Yiyan et al., “Charging Current in Long Lines and High-Voltage Cables—Protection Application Considerations”, 67th Annual Georgia Tech Protective Relaying Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, May 8-10, 2013, pp. 1-17.
“Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 31, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/981,616”, Dec. 31, 2018.
“Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2019; U.S. Appl. No. 16/002,993”, Jan. 14, 2019.
“Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 24, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/157,726”, Sep. 24, 2018.
“Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 4, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,065”, Sep. 4, 2018.
“Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/055,422”, Jul. 27, 2018.
Albasri, Fadhel A. et al., “Performance Comparison of Distance Protection Schemes for Shung-FACTS Compensated Transmission Lines”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 22, No. 4, Oct. 2007, pp. 2116-2125.
Bhaskar, M. A. et al., “Impact of FACTS devices on distance protection in Transmission System”, 2014 IEEE National Conference on Emerging Trends in New & Renewable Energy Sources and Energy Management (NCET NRES EM), Dec. 16, 2014, pp. 52-58.
Samantaray, S. R. , “A Data-Mining Model for Protection of FACTS-Based Transmission Line”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 28, No. 2, Apr. 2013, pp. 612-618.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180262006 A1 Sep 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62264739 Dec 2015 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15055422 Feb 2016 US
Child 15975373 US