1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to systems and methods for dynamic line balancing of high-voltage (HV) transmission lines using spatially distributed active impedance injection modules that are connected directly in series with the HV transmission lines that form the HV electric power grid.
2. Prior Art
HV electric power grids typically operate at voltages that are on the order of about 50 kV up to about 600 kV. One of the requirements of these HV power grids is the need for dynamic distributed active power-flow control capability that can inject both inductive and capacitive impedance on to the HV transmission line as required to achieve line balancing and phase angle correction. A system that can react fast to the problems of power flow over the grid will greatly improve the grid operation and power-transfer efficiency.
Congested networks limit system reliability and increase the cost of power delivery by having part of the power dissipated in unbalanced circuits causing loop currents with associated power loss. In addition, substantially out-of-phase voltages and currents on the transmission lines reduce the capacity of the lines to transfer real power from the generator to the distribution substation. To remove this limitation, it is desired to have HV power grids with transmission lines that are balanced, with power transfer shared substantially per optimization methods, with reasonable power factor, and controllable phase difference between voltage and currents. These improvements reduce the loop currents and associated losses and enable real power transfer over the grid up to the capacity of the lines.
Most of the grid control capabilities today are ground based and installed at substations with switchable inductive and capacitive loads. These installations require high-voltage insulation and high-current switching capabilities. Being at the substations these can use methods of cooling that include oil cooling, forced recirculation of coolant, and other options without consideration of the weight and size of the units. These lumped controls require a centralized data collection and control facility to coordinate operation across the grid and hence have associated delays in implementing the control function on the power grid.
Distributed and active control of transmission line impedance, if effectively implemented with high reliability, improves the system efficiency substantially, but requires cost-effective implementations that can alter the impedance of the HV transmission lines, with fast identification and fast response to line-balance issues, by changing the phase angle of the current-voltage relationship applied across the line, thus controlling power flow.
At present proven effective and reliable solutions for distributed control of the power grid as, for example, described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,835,128 to Divan et al (the '128 patent) are limited.
Power is transmitted from the electric power source or generator 104 to the load or distribution substation 106. Spatially distributed passive inductive impedance injection modules or DSR 100) are directly attached to the power conductor on the HV transmission line 108, and hence form the primary winding of the DSR 100 with a secondary winding having a bypass switch that, when open, inject an inductive impedance on to the line for distributed control. These DSR 100s only provide a limited amount of control by injecting only the inductive impedance on to the line. When the secondary winding is shorted by the bypass switch, the DSR 100 is in a protection mode and injects substantially zero impedance on to the HV line.
When using multiple DSRs 100 connected on the HV transmission line as in
Distributed active impedance injection modules on high-voltage transmission lines have been proposed in the past. U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,952 of Divan et al. licensed to the applicant entity is an example of such.
In practice the active impedance injection modules 300s have not been practical due to reasons of cost and reliability. In order to inject the needed impedances on to the HV transmission line for providing reasonable line balancing there is a need to generate a significant amount of power in the converter circuits. This has required the active impedance injection modules 300 to use specialized devices with adequate voltages and currents ratings.
The failure of a module in a spatially distributed inductive-impedance injection-line balancing system using DSR 100 modules inserts a near-zero impedance (equal to the leakage impedance) set by the shorted secondary winding or substantially zero impedance on to the line. Failure of a few modules out of a large number distributed over the HV transmission line does not mandate the immediate shutdown of the line. The repairs or replacement of the failed modules can be undertaken at a time when the line can be brought down with minimum impact on the power flow on the grid. On the other hand, for utilities to implement distributed active line balancing, the individual modules must be extremely reliable. These also have to be cost effective to be accepted by the Utilities.
Power transmission line balancing circuits have been limited to the use of delayed-acting heavy-duty fully-insulated oil-cooled inductive and capacitive impedance injectors or phase-shifting transformers prone to single-point failures, located at substations where repairs of these failed units can be handled with out major impact on power transfer over the grid.
As described above the use the specialized devices that can handle the needed power with high reliability demanded by the utilities at a reasonable cost has not been possible so far. There is a need for such a capability for converting the grid to a more efficient and intelligent system for power distribution. If it can be established, it will have a major impact on the efficiency and capabilities of the grid.
The drawings are meant only to help distinguish the invention from the prior art. The objects, features and advantages of the invention are detailed in the description taken together with the drawings.
As discussed above there is a need to have high-reliability, fault-tolerant and intelligent distributed dynamic-control modules (distributed active impedance injection modules) with capability to inject both inductance and capacitive impedances of sufficient and appropriate magnitude on to high-voltage transmission lines to enable distributed power flow control. These distributed dynamic control modules are directly attached to the HV-Transmission line and are at line potential while in operation. The distributed dynamic control modules are enabled to operate by extracting power from the HV-Transmission line for control and for generating the necessary voltages to be impressed on the High Voltage (HV) transmission line. The modules generate voltages at the right phase angle for injection on to the HV-transmission line, through the multi-turn transformer, to provide the necessary inductive or capacitive impedance during operation.
The invention disclosed the use of the multi-turn transformer having multi-turn primary winding connected in series with the HV transmission line 108 by cutting and splicing in the winding. The secondary side of the multi-turn transformer and all associated circuitry are electrically isolated from the ground. However, one side of the secondary winding is connected to the primary winding to provide a virtual ground or “floating ground” reference and also partly to protect the secondary-side circuits form stray fields. Alternately the virtual ground 408 can be established by connecting the negative dc link of the inverter/electronic injection module to the HV transmission line. Further, both may be grounded for effective operation. Different power-electronics topologies may necessitate other grounding schemes and these schemes do not effect the key invention but, rather, are specific implementations.
In order for the distributed control modules to be successfully accepted by utilities and installed on lines, these distributed control modules have to be smart and self-aware, remotely controllable and configurable. The modules should be of a reasonable weight compared to the line segment over which these are to be installed, even where the modules are suspended in an insulated fashion from the towers or are supported by additional support structures. These should also have a low wind resistance to reduce the effect of wind loading on the line/tower/special support structure employed. As an essential feature all the electronic components and circuits of the module should have very high reliability to reduce the probability of line down times due to failure of the modules/components used therein. The splicing connection of the module to the HV transmission line also has to have high reliability.
The invention disclosed provides distributed active control having very high reliability and capability for power flow and line balancing across the multiple high-voltage transmission lines used for power transmission on the high power grid system. The invention overcomes the issues of the prior art implementations discussed and meet the criteria set for the use of the distributed control modules that are discussed below.
There are multiple requirements that have been defined for achieving the use of distributed control that need changes from the prior art implementations. These are:
The disclosed invention provides for improvement in all the above aspects in the embodiments disclosed below:
The prior art dynamic injection modules had problems, which prevented their acceptance. One was the need for specialized components for the generation of the magnitude of injection power (voltage and current) to be generated to provide adequate control of the HV transmission line segment where the module is attached. The second was the lack of reliability due to the modules handling high power levels, which again necessitated specially tested and qualified component use. Both the above requirements resulted in the cost of the module also being very high for use by utilities.
The disclosed invention for increasing the impressed voltage or impedance on the transmission line uses multiple turns on the primary winding of a series-connected injection transformer. Increasing the number of turns in the primary winding alters the turns ratio of the transformer, and allows the distributed active impedance injection module (injection module) to have a greater impact. Since the primary winding of the injection transformer need to be in series with the HV transmission line, the use of additional turns of the primary winding requires the HV transmission line to be cut and the ends of the winding to be spliced in series with the HV transmission line. Further having multiple turns of heavy-duty wire, capable of carrying the line currents seen on the power grid and the use of a heavier core to provide the required coupling/flux linkage to the line, increases the weight and wind-capture cross section of the injection module. Though the injection modules are still attachable directly to the line, it is preferable to provide additional support for the heavier injection modules of the present invention due to its additional weight.
The advantages of the disclosed multi-turn primary transformer include the ability to inject higher voltages, with 90-degree lead or lag angle, providing inductive or capacitive impedances respectively, on to the HV transmission line for power flow control and grid optimization. With more turns, the transformer can also be designed such that the—power-rating-to-weight ratio (kVA per kg) of the unit can be increased, increasing the economy of the unit as well. The use of the multi-turn primary winding also allow the preferred use of non-gapped transformer core, with high-permeability core materials, thereby reducing the flux leakage and improving power transfer between the primary and secondary windings. This, and the careful selection of the number of secondary turns as a ratio of the primary turns, further reduces the dynamic secondary voltages that have to be generated for the required injection of voltages with the correct phase for line balancing. The lower voltage required to be generated across the secondary winding, to achieve the high kVA injection, due to the carefully selected ratio of the primary to secondary windings, enable high-volume power semiconductors and components to be used. The use of these semiconductors and components in the secondary circuit of the transformer (for the control module, the power converter generating the necessary leading or lagging voltages and protection circuits including the shorting switch) make the module very cost-effective. Further the use of lower voltages in the secondary circuits with associated power electronic components with sufficient voltage margins provide the necessary reliability of operation for these circuits connected across the secondary windings to satisfy the reliability requirements of the utilities for use of the distributed modules.
Further using the distributed approach, with the impedance injection modules, allows for significantly greater “N+X” system reliability, where N is the required number of distributed modules, and X is the number of extra redundant modules. Therefore, by ensuring the reliability of each unit by itself being sufficient for use by the utilities, the added extra redundant distributed active-impedance control modules provide an additional layer of “system” reliability over and above the unit reliability. The use of these distributed impedance injection modules also provide the intelligence at the point of impact, for providing fast response to any changes in the optimum characteristics of the lines while transferring power. This in turn results in a grid using distributed injection modules of high reliability, capable of providing very high system reliability, acceptable to all the utilities. The use of the distributed impedance injection modules hence are enabled to provide the best capability to balance the power transmitted over the HV-transmission-lines of the power grid.
A second low-voltage transformer 302 in the secondary circuit is connected to a power supply 303 within the injector module 400 that generates the necessary power required for the low-voltage electronics comprising the sensing, communication and control circuitry, all of which are lumped in the block diagram of the module as controller 406, the voltage converter 405 and the secondary winding shorting switch 304. The voltage converter or simply converter 405 may be of any appropriate design, as such devices of various designs are well known in the art. Typically such devices are configured to inject an inductive load onto the high voltage transmission line, and may also have the capability of injecting a capacitive load on the transmission for power factor control, and may further be capable of controlling harmonic content in the high-voltage transmission line. Such devices are also known by other names, such as by way of example, inverters or converters/inverters. An exemplary device of this general type is the combination of the inverter 71 and energy storage 74 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,952, though many other examples of such devices are well known. These devices typically act as active impedances to controllably impose the desired impedance onto the high-voltage transmission line. Also preferably the controller 410 used in the preferred embodiments includes a transceiver for receiving control signals and reporting on high voltage transmission line conditions, etc.
The shorting switch 304 is activated to prevent damage to the circuits connected across the secondary winding 404 during occurrence of high transients on the HV transmission line due to a short circuit or lightning strikes, or even for prolonged overloads The controller 406 has sensor circuitry for monitoring the status of the line and for triggering the protection circuits 304, and a transceiver establishing a communication capability 410 for inter-link communication and for accepting external configuration and control commands, which are used to provide additional instructions to the converter 406. The voltage converter 405 is an active voltage converter that, based on input from the controller 406, generates the necessary leading or lagging voltages of sufficient magnitude, to be impressed on the secondary winding 404 of the power line transformer of the distributed active impedance injection module 400, to be coupled to the HV transmission line 108 through the series-connected multi-turn primary winding 403 of the transformer. This injected voltage at the appropriate phase angle is able to provide the necessary impedance input capability for balancing the power transfer over the grid in a distributed fashion. The multi-turn primary 403 of the disclosed transformer 400A coupled to the HV-transmission line 108 is hence the main enabler for implementing the active distributed control of the power transfer and balancing of the grid.
The current application addresses the advantages and features of the use of multi-turn secondary windings 403 of a distributed active impedance injection module (injector module) 400 attached to the HV transmission line 108. By using a multi-turn primary winding 403 the multi-turn transformer 400A is able to impress a higher voltage on the power HV transmission line with a given transformer core size and weight while the connected circuits of the secondary winding 404 (converter 405, controller 406 and protection switch 304) of the transformer 400A are able to operate at lower voltage ranges with the proper turns ration selection, that are typical of power-electronics components commercially available. This enables a cost-effective product using standard components and devices while providing the needed high reliability to the modules and high reliability to the grid system. The use of this type of injection module 400 allows fast response to changes in loading of the HV transmission lines at or close to the point of change for dynamic control and balancing of the transmission lines. By providing the capability for injection of sufficiently large inductive and capacitive loads in line segments using reliable distributed injector modules 400, the over all system stability is also improved. The injector module 400 of the current invention is not confined to substations, as in the past, but is enabled to provide power flow control capability within existing utility right-of-way corridors in a distributed fashion. The use of multi-turn primary winding 403 also allows the typical use of non-gapped core for the transformer improving the weight and power transfer coupling of the device to the HV transmission line 108.
It should be understood that all the associated circuits of the module are enclosed in a housing, which is suspended insulated from ground at the HV transmission line voltage. Due to weight considerations it is preferable to have these modules suspended from the towers or provide additional support for their safe attachment.
Even though the invention disclosed is described using specific implementation, it is intended only to be exemplary and non-limiting. The practitioners of the art will be able to understand and modify the same based on new innovations and concepts, as they are made available. The invention is intended to encompass these modifications.
Thus the present invention has a number of aspects, which aspects may be practiced alone or in various combinations or sub-combinations, as desired. Also while certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed and described herein for purposes of exemplary illustration and not for purposes of limitation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/055,422 filed Feb. 26, 2016 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/264,739 filed Dec. 8, 2015, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2237812 | De Blieux | Apr 1941 | A |
2551841 | Kepple et al. | May 1951 | A |
3556310 | Loukotsky | Jan 1971 | A |
3704001 | Sloop | Nov 1972 | A |
3750992 | Johnson | Aug 1973 | A |
3913003 | Felkel | Oct 1975 | A |
4025824 | Cheatham | May 1977 | A |
4057736 | Jeppson | Nov 1977 | A |
4103853 | Bannan | Aug 1978 | A |
4164345 | Arnold et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4200899 | Volman et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4277639 | Olsson | Jul 1981 | A |
4286207 | Spreadbury et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4323722 | Winkelman | Apr 1982 | A |
4367512 | Fujita | Jan 1983 | A |
4514950 | Goodson, Jr. | May 1985 | A |
4562360 | Fujimoto | Dec 1985 | A |
4577826 | Bergstrom et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4710850 | Jahn et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4821138 | Nakano et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4903927 | Farmer | Feb 1990 | A |
5006846 | Granville et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5023768 | Collier | Jun 1991 | A |
5032738 | Vithayathil | Jul 1991 | A |
5193774 | Rogers | Mar 1993 | A |
5461300 | Kappenman | Oct 1995 | A |
5469044 | Gyugyi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5513061 | Gelbien et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5610501 | Nelson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5648888 | Le Francois et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5844462 | Rapoport et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5884886 | Hageli | Mar 1999 | A |
5886888 | Akamatsu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5986617 | McLellan | Nov 1999 | A |
6088249 | Adamson | Jul 2000 | A |
6134105 | Lueker | Oct 2000 | A |
6147581 | Rancourt et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6215653 | Cochran et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233137 | Kolos et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6335613 | Sen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6486569 | Couture | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6727604 | Couture | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6831377 | Yampolsky et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6895373 | Garcia et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914195 | Archambault et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7090176 | Chavot et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091703 | Folts et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7105952 | Divan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7193338 | Ghali | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7352564 | Courtney | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7460931 | Jacobson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7642757 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7688043 | Toki et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7834736 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7835128 | Divan et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7932621 | Spellman | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8019484 | Korba et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8249836 | Yoon et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8270558 | Dielissen | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8310099 | Engel et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8401709 | Cherian et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8441778 | Ashmore | May 2013 | B1 |
8497592 | Jones | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8680720 | Schauder et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8681479 | Englert et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8816527 | Ramsay et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8825218 | Cherian et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8867244 | Trainer et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8872366 | Campion et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8890373 | Savolainen et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8896988 | Subbaiahthever et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8922038 | Bywaters et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8957752 | Sharma et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8996183 | Forbes, Jr. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9099893 | Schmiegel et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9124100 | Ukai et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9124138 | Mori et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9130458 | Crookes et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9172246 | Ramsay et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9178456 | Smith et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9185000 | Mabilleau et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9207698 | Forbes, Jr. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9217762 | Kreikebaum et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9246325 | Coca Figuerola et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9325173 | Varma et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331482 | Huang | May 2016 | B2 |
9563218 | Hall et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9659114 | He et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9843176 | Gibson et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20020005668 | Couture | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020042696 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030006652 | Couture | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030098768 | Hoffmann et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040153215 | Kearney et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040217836 | Archambault et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050052801 | Ghali | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073200 | Divan | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050194944 | Folts et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205726 | Chavot et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060085097 | Courtney | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070135972 | Jacobson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070250217 | Yoon et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080103737 | Yoon et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080157728 | Toki et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177425 | Korba et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080278976 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310069 | Divan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090243876 | Lilien et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281679 | Taft et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100026275 | Walton | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100177450 | Holcomb et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100213765 | Engel et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100302744 | Englert et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110060474 | Schmiegel et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110095162 | Parduhn et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106321 | Cherian et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110172837 | Forbes, Jr. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120105023 | Schauder et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120146335 | Bywaters et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120205981 | Varma et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120242150 | Ukai et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120255920 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120293920 | Subbaiahthever et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130002032 | Mori et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033103 | McJunkin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130044407 | Byeon et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130094264 | Crookes et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130128636 | Trainer et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130166085 | Cherian et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169044 | Stinessen et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130182355 | Coca Figuerola et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184894 | Sakuma et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130200617 | Smith et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130249321 | Gao et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130277082 | Hyde et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130345888 | Forbes, Jr. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140008982 | Powell et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025217 | Jin et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032000 | Chandrashekhara et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140111297 | Earhart et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129195 | He et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132229 | Huang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140153383 | Mabilleau et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188689 | Kalsi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140203640 | Stinessen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140210213 | Campion et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140246914 | Chopra et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140247554 | Sharma et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140266288 | Trabacchin et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140268458 | Luciani et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140312859 | Ramsay et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140327305 | Ramsay et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347158 | Goeke et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150012146 | Cherian et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150029764 | Peng | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150051744 | Mitra | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150184415 | Bushore | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150226772 | Kreikebaum et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244307 | Cameron | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150270689 | Gibson et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160036231 | Ramsay et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160036341 | Jang et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20170163036 | Munguia et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170169928 | Carrow et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
660094 | Mar 1987 | CH |
103256337 | Aug 2013 | CN |
203668968 | Jun 2014 | CN |
2002-199563 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2005-045888 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2015-086692 | May 2015 | JP |
10-1053514 | Aug 2011 | KR |
WO-2008082820 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2014035881 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO-2014074956 | May 2014 | WO |
WO-2014099876 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2015074538 | May 2015 | WO |
WO-2015119789 | Aug 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 2, 2017; International Application No. PCT/US2016/062358”, dated Feb. 2, 2017. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 2, 2017; International Application No. PCT/US2016/062620”, dated Feb. 2, 2017. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 2, 2017; International Application No. PCT/US2016/061009”, dated Mar. 2, 2017. |
“Invitation of the International Searching Authority to Pay Additional Fees dated Dec. 15, 2016; International Application No. PCT/US2016/061009”, Dec. 15, 2016. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/069,785”, Feb. 22, 2018. |
“Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/055,422”, Apr. 6, 2018. |
“Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/157,726”, dated Apr. 6, 2018. |
“Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,065”, Feb. 9, 2018. |
“Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2017; U.S. Appl. No. 15/069,785”, Jul. 26, 2017. |
“Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2017; U.S. Appl. No. 15/157,726”, Nov. 3, 2017. |
Amin, S. M. et al., “Toward a Smart Grid: Power Delivery for the 21st Century”, IEEE power & energy magazine, vol. 3, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2005, pp. 34-41. |
Angeladas, Emmanouil , “High Voltage Substations Overview (part 1)”, Siemens, Jan. 24, 2013, pp. 1-8. |
Aquino-Lugo, Angela A. , “Distributed and Decentralized Control of the Power Grid”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010, 172 pp. total. |
Dash, P. K. et al., “Digital Protection of Power Transmission Lines in the Presence of Series Connected FACTS Devices”, IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2000, pp. 1967-1972. |
Divan, D. M. , “Nondissipative Switched Networks for High-Power Applications”, Electronics Letters, vol. 20, No. 7, Mar. 29, 1984, pp. 277-279. |
Funato, Hirohito et al., “Realization of Negative Inductance Using Variable Active-Passive Reactance (VAPAR)”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 12, No. 4, Jul. 1997, pp. 589-596. |
Gyugyi, Laszlo et al., “Status Synchronous Series Compensator: A Solid-State Approach to the Series Compensation of Transmission Lines”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 12, No. 1, Jan. 1997, pp. 406-417. |
Gyugyi, Laszlo et al., “The Interline Power Flow Controller Concept: A New Approach to Power Flow Management in Transmission Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 14, No. 3, Jul. 1999, pp. 1115-1123. |
Kavitha, M. et al., “Integration of FACTS into Energy Storage Systems for Future Power Systems Applications”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, vol. 2, Issue 2, Feb. 2013, pp. 800-810. |
Kumbhar, Mahesh M. et al., “Smart Grid: Advanced Electricity Distribution Network”, IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), vol. 2, Issue 6, Jun. 2012, pp. 23-29. |
Lambert, Frank C. , “Power Flow Control”, ISGT Europe, 2014, Istanbul, Turkey, Oct. 13, 2014, pp. 1-15. |
Lehmkoster, Carsten , “Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow for an Economical Operation of FACTS-Devices in Liberalized Energy Markets”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 17, No. 2, Apr. 2002, pp. 603-608. |
Mali, Bhairavanath N. et al., “Performance Study of Transmission Line Ferranti Effect and Fault Simulation Model Using MATLAB”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation and Control Engineering, vol. 4, Issue 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 49-52. |
Mutale, Joseph et al., “Transmission Network Reinforcement Versus Facts: An Economic Assessment”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 15, No. 3, Aug. 2000, pp. 961-967. |
Ramchurn, Sarvapali D. et al., “Putting the ‘Smarts’ into the Smart Grid: A Grand Challenge for Artificial Intelligence”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 55, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 86-97. |
Reddy, D. M. et al., “FACTS Controllers Implementation in Energy Storage Systems for Advanced Power Electronic Applications—A Solution”, American Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, Issue 2, vol. 1, Jan. 2013, pp. 36-63. |
Renz, B. A. et al., “AEP Unified Power Flow Controller Performance”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 14, No. 4, Oct. 1999, pp. 1374-1381. |
Ribeiro, P. et al., “Energy Storage Systems”, Chapters 1-2.4 of Section entitled “Energy Storage Systems” in Electrical Engineering—vol. III, edited by Kit Po Wong, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) Publications, Dec. 13, 2009, 11 pp. total. |
Schauder, C. D. et al., “Operation of the Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) Under Practical Constraints”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 13, No. 2, Apr. 1998, pp. 630-639. |
Siemens Sas, “Portable Power Solutions, “Plug and play” High Voltage E-Houses, skids and mobile high voltage substations up to 420 kV”, Nov. 2015, 8 pp. total. |
Swain, S. C. et al., “Design of Static Synchronous Series Compensator Based Damping Controller Employing Real Coded Genetic Algorithm”, International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering, vol. 5, No. 3, 2011, pp. 399-407. |
Xue, Yiyan et al., “Charging Current in Long Lines and High-Voltage Cables—Protection Application Considerations”, 67th Annual Georgia Tech Protective Relaying Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, May 8-10, 2013, pp. 1-17. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 31, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/981,616”, Dec. 31, 2018. |
“Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2019; U.S. Appl. No. 16/002,993”, Jan. 14, 2019. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 24, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/157,726”, Sep. 24, 2018. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 4, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,065”, Sep. 4, 2018. |
“Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2018; U.S. Appl. No. 15/055,422”, Jul. 27, 2018. |
Albasri, Fadhel A. et al., “Performance Comparison of Distance Protection Schemes for Shung-FACTS Compensated Transmission Lines”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 22, No. 4, Oct. 2007, pp. 2116-2125. |
Bhaskar, M. A. et al., “Impact of FACTS devices on distance protection in Transmission System”, 2014 IEEE National Conference on Emerging Trends in New & Renewable Energy Sources and Energy Management (NCET NRES EM), Dec. 16, 2014, pp. 52-58. |
Samantaray, S. R. , “A Data-Mining Model for Protection of FACTS-Based Transmission Line”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 28, No. 2, Apr. 2013, pp. 612-618. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180262006 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62264739 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15055422 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15975373 | US |