The present disclosure relates to controlling airflow into a cylinder.
During steady state conditions, airflow into an intake manifold of an engine via a throttle and EGR may be allocated to deliver a desired cylinder airflow amount while maintaining desired EGR in the cylinder. However, during transient conditions, the intake manifold acts as an air buffer and thus the airflow reaching the cylinder may lead or lag desired airflow amounts entering into the manifold. This may result in poor torque response and/or transient EGR disturbances.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,273,019 describes a model for predicting mass air flow into an engine, both with and without EGR, during the same transient condition event. Based on a difference between the models, the percentage of the mass flow that derives from EGR may be determined. While the disclosed models enable determination of EGR concentration during transient events, they do not provide for maintaining a desired cylinder EGR amount, nor do they overcome the delay often associated with achieving a desired cylinder airflow amount during a transient event.
The inventors have recognized the issues with the above approach and offer a method to at least partly address them. In one embodiment, a method for controlling airflow into a cylinder of an engine comprises, if a previous cylinder airflow is different than a desired cylinder airflow, allocating flow into an intake manifold between a throttle and an EGR valve to provide the desired cylinder airflow while maintaining a desired EGR amount in the cylinder.
In this way, both the throttle and EGR valve may be controlled using transient airflow compensation to achieve rapid filling or unfilling of an intake manifold. Further, by allocating the flow between the throttle and the EGR valve, a desired EGR amount in the cylinder may be maintained. In one example, the desired cylinder airflow may be a prediction based on the previous cylinder airflow, a manifold filling model, and a driver torque request. The manifold filling model may determine a compensation airflow amount entering the manifold that rapidly drives the airflow leaving the manifold from the previous cylinder airflow amount to the desired cylinder airflow amount. This compensation airflow amount may be allocated between the throttle and the EGR valve to provide the desired cylinder airflow while maintaining a desired cylinder EGR amount.
The present disclosure may provide several advantages. First, transient conditions frequently result in torque fluctuations that can be unsatisfactory to a vehicle operator. By rapidly responding to a requested torque change, the present disclosure may improve vehicle response and operator satisfaction. Further, EGR disturbances during transient conditions may degrade combustion events, leading to reduced fuel economy and increased emissions. By maintaining desired EGR amounts even during transient events, fuel economy and emissions may be improved.
The above advantages and other advantages, and features of the present description will be readily apparent from the following Detailed Description when taken alone or in connection with the accompanying drawings.
It should be understood that the summary above is provided to introduce in simplified form a selection of concepts that are further described in the detailed description. It is not meant to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, the scope of which is defined uniquely by the claims that follow the detailed description. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any disadvantages noted above or in any part of this disclosure.
During a change in cylinder flow from an intake manifold, for example in response to a pedal tip-in event, airflow disturbances may result due to the delay associated with the filling or unfilling of the manifold. Thus, during transient conditions, delivered cylinder airflow may not match desired or commanded airflow. Closed-loop feedback control using sensors in the engine, such as manifold pressure and/or mass air flow sensors, may alleviate some of the issues in delivering desired cylinder flow during transient conditions, but sensor feedback is also associated with a response delay.
By using a manifold filling model that predicts a change in a cylinder flow amount based on a previous cylinder flow amount and a constant volumetric efficiency state of the manifold, accurate determination of desired cylinder flow may be provided without reliance on sensors. Further, because the model may predict a manifold inflow amount that drives the previous cylinder flow to the desired cylinder flow without delay, transient disturbances may be reduced. This manifold inflow amount may be allocated between a throttle and EGR valve dependent on a desired cylinder EGR amount such that desired cylinder EGR amounts are maintained even during transient opening or closing of the throttle.
Combustion chamber 30 may receive intake air from intake manifold 44 via intake passage 42 and may exhaust combustion gases via exhaust passage 48. Intake manifold 44 and exhaust passage 48 can selectively communicate with combustion chamber 30 via respective intake valve 52 and exhaust valve 54. In some embodiments, combustion chamber 30 may include two or more intake valves and/or two or more exhaust valves.
In this example, intake valve 52 and exhaust valves 54 may be controlled by cam actuation via respective cam actuation systems 51 and 53. Cam actuation systems 51 and 53 may each include one or more cams and may utilize one or more of cam profile switching (CPS), variable cam timing (VCT), variable valve timing (VVT) and/or variable valve lift (VVL) systems that may be operated by controller 12 to vary valve operation. The position of intake valve 52 and exhaust valve 54 may be determined by position sensors 55 and 57, respectively. In alternative embodiments, intake valve 52 and/or exhaust valve 54 may be controlled by electric valve actuation. For example, cylinder 30 may alternatively include an intake valve controlled via electric valve actuation and an exhaust valve controlled via cam actuation including CPS and/or VCT systems.
Fuel injector 66 is shown coupled directly to combustion chamber 30 for injecting fuel directly therein in proportion to the pulse width of signal FPW received from controller 12 via electronic driver 68. In this manner, fuel injector 66 provides what is known as direct injection of fuel into combustion chamber 30. The fuel injector may be mounted in the side of the combustion chamber or in the top of the combustion chamber, for example. Fuel may be delivered to fuel injector 66 by a fuel system (not shown) including a fuel tank, a fuel pump, and a fuel rail. In some embodiments, combustion chamber 30 may alternatively or additionally include a fuel injector arranged in intake passage 42 in a configuration that provides what is known as port injection of fuel into the intake port upstream of combustion chamber 30.
Intake passage 42 may include a throttle 62 having a throttle plate 64. In this particular example, the position of throttle plate 64 may be varied by controller 12 via a signal provided to an electric motor or actuator included with throttle 62, a configuration that is commonly referred to as electronic throttle control (ETC). In this manner, throttle 62 may be operated to vary the intake air provided to combustion chamber 30 among other engine cylinders. The position of throttle plate 64 may be provided to controller 12 by throttle position signal TP. Intake passage 42 may include a mass air flow sensor 120 and a manifold air pressure sensor 122 for providing respective signals MAF and MAP to controller 12.
Ignition system 88 can provide an ignition spark to combustion chamber 30 via spark plug 92 in response to spark advance signal SA from controller 12, under select operating modes. Though spark ignition components are shown, in some embodiments, combustion chamber 30 or one or more other combustion chambers of engine 10 may be operated in a compression ignition mode, with or without an ignition spark.
Exhaust gas sensor 126 is shown coupled to exhaust passage 48 upstream of emission control device 70. Sensor 126 may be any suitable sensor for providing an indication of exhaust gas air/fuel ratio such as a linear oxygen sensor or UEGO (universal or wide-range exhaust gas oxygen), a two-state oxygen sensor or EGO, a HEGO (heated EGO), a NOx, HC, or CO sensor. Emission control device 70 is shown arranged along exhaust passage 48 downstream of exhaust gas sensor 126. Device 70 may be a three way catalyst (TWC), NOx trap, various other emission control devices, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, during operation of engine 10, emission control device 70 may be periodically reset by operating at least one cylinder of the engine within a particular air/fuel ratio.
Further, in the disclosed embodiments, an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system may route a desired portion of exhaust gas from exhaust passage 48 to intake manifold 44 via EGR passage 140. The amount of EGR provided to intake manifold 44 may be varied by controller 12 via EGR valve 142. Further, an EGR sensor 144 may be arranged within the EGR passage and may provide an indication of one or more pressure, temperature, and concentration of the exhaust gas. In some examples, sensor 144 is a differential pressure transducer detecting pressure drop across a flow control orifice placed either upstream or downstream of the EGR valve which will also provide an indication of the amount of EGR. Sensor 144 also may also be a position sensor which can detect EGR valve flow area changes based upon commands from controller 12. Further, during some conditions, a portion of combustion gases may be retained or trapped in the combustion chamber by controlling exhaust valve timing, such as by controlling a variable valve timing mechanism.
Controller 12 is shown in
Storage medium read-only memory 106 can be programmed with computer readable data representing instructions executable by processor 102 for performing the methods described below in
As described above,
At 204, a desired driver cylinder air flow is determined based on a driver torque request. Thus, the desired cylinder air flow may be a change in the cylinder air flow due to a torque request.
At 206, method 200 includes applying the previous and desired cylinder air flows to a model, such as the manifold filling model, to determine a manifold inflow amount. The previous cylinder air flow amount may be determined based on a manifold filling model, as described in more detail with respect to
Both 210 and 212 proceed to 214 where the throttle and/or EGR valve positions are scheduled based on the allocated flow and MAP, which may be predicted based on a model (described in
At 302, method 300 includes receiving a driver desired cylinder flow request, such as the driver cylinder flow of
At 306, method 300 includes receiving a scheduled and trajectory EGR percentage. The scheduled and future EGR percentage may be based on operating conditions including speed, load, combustion stability, etc. At 308, based on the scheduled EGR percentage and the overall desired cylinder air flow, the EGR percentage is converted to a target EGR flow for use in allocating the flow between the throttle and the EGR valve, as explained with regard to
At 310, the desired and previous cylinder air flows are input into an inverse flow model filter equation. As explained above with respect to
The filter constant (Fk) may be a manifold filling lag constant based on current operating conditions, and will be described in more detail with respect to
While not depicted in
At 402, method 400 includes determining prediction model filter parameters. As explained previously, the flow model manifold filling model includes a filter constant (Fk). The filter constant may be a state transition model constant, and as applied herein may be the manifold filling lag based on current conditions. The filter constant may be based on the ideal gas law, and may include a volume of the intake manifold, a throttle pressure across the throttle, an EGR pressure across the EGR valve, an intake air mass, an EGR mass, and engine temperature. As such, determining the model filter parameters may include determining the temperature and the volume of the manifold at 404, and the mass and the partial pressures of the intake air through the throttle and the EGR through the EGR valve at 406. The partial pressures and mass of the intake and EGR may be determined from sensor output and/or from parameters from previous model estimates (as described below). The manifold temperature may be estimated based on ambient temperature and engine temperature, or from a temperature sensor.
At 408, the throttle flow and EGR valve flow are received. The throttle flow and EGR valve flow may be the flows output from the flow model, as described with respect to
At 414, the TA and EGR valve position are each converted to a no delay throttle flow and no delay EGR flow. The no delay throttle and EGR flows are then input into a manifold filling model for no delay flow at 416. This includes receiving an output of the previous cylinder flow (CF) at 418, which may be input as the previous cylinder flow (CF(x-1)) value into the flow model of
Upon outputting the previous cylinder no delay flow at 418, method 400 returns.
The second branch of the prediction model includes converting the filtered TA and EGR valve positions from 412 to a delay throttle flow and delay EGR valve flow at 420. The delay in the flow may be added in order to predict a current cylinder flow value that accounts for the delay in filling the manifold. At 422, the delayed throttle and EGR flows are input into a manifold fill model for the current flow. This includes receiving an output that is the prediction of the current cylinder flow at 423, and may be determined using the filter equation described above.
At 424, the predicted current cylinder flow output at 423 may be used to calculate MAP, TIP, and TOP at both current and previous device settings. The device settings may include any changes to engine operating parameters that cause a disturbance in the air flow in the manifold, such as a change in charge motion control valve position, change in exhaust backpressure, sudden change in engine speed, change in camshaft position, etc. These may be estimated based on operating parameters including engine speed, cam position, charge motion control valve position, barometric pressure, EGR flow, charge temperature, manifold volume, exhaust backpres sure, etc.
At 426, a difference between the previous and current MAP may be determined to calculate the air disturbance to the model. In some embodiments, this may include dividing the difference in MAP by (RT/V) and a change in time (Δt), wherein R is the ideal gas constant, T is the temperature of the manifold, and V is the volume of the manifold. This produces an air amount to the manifold inlet that is needed to cancel out any changes to the manifold flow caused by the air disturbances. One or more gains may be applied to the disturbances, to tune the model, and the disturbances may be output to the flow model of
Thus, method 400 of
Method 500 comprises, at 502, determining if a desired cylinder air flow amount is greater than a previous cylinder air flow amount. If yes, method 500 proceeds to 504 to increase the inflow amount to the manifold. At 506, the throttle is transiently opened more than necessary to deliver at least a part of the increased inflow to the manifold. The term “more than necessary” is meant to indicate an opening amount that is more than would be opened to provide the desired cylinder flow if the engine were in steady state operating conditions. That is, the throttle is opened by a larger amount during a response to a transient increase in cylinder air than the throttle is opened during steady state, even if the amount of air delivered to the cylinder is the same in both circumstances. In some embodiments, if EGR is not enabled, the throttle is opened to provide all the inflow.
If EGR is enabled, at 508 method 500 includes correspondingly opening the EGR valve by a proportionate amount to the throttle opening. Thus, the EGR valve is also opened more than necessary in order to track the air flow through the throttle and maintain a desired cylinder EGR amount. The EGR valve may not be opened the same amount as the throttle, but may be opened to a similar degree. The setting of the EGR valve may further be based on the desired cylinder EGR amount.
Returning to 502, if the desired cylinder flow is not greater than the previous, method 500 proceeds to 510 to determine if the desired cylinder flow is less than the previous cylinder flow. If yes, method 500 proceeds to 512 decrease the inflow amount to the manifold. At 514, the throttle is transiently closed more than necessary, and at 516, if EGR is enabled, the EGR valve is correspondingly closed by an amount proportionate to the throttle. Upon either opening or closing the EGR valve at 508 or 516, method 500 returns to continue to adjust the throttle and EGR valves based on desired and previous cylinder air flow.
Returning to 510, if it is determined that the desired cylinder air flow is not less than the previous air flow, then the desired air flow is equal to the previous air flow. As such, method 500 proceeds to 518 to maintain current throttle and EGR valve positions, and then method 500 ends.
Thus, the methods provided in
Now turning to
Before t1, based on engine operating conditions (such as, an engine speed and load condition), a desired cylinder air flow and cylinder EGR percentage may be determined. Based on the desired cylinder air flow and EGR amount, an EGR flow and a throttle flow may be determined. In one example, at t1, a sudden increase in cylinder air flow may be requested. The increase in cylinder air flow may be requested, for example, during a pedal tip-in. Accordingly, at t1, an amount of throttle flow may be increased. Additionally, a corresponding amount of EGR flow may be increased. The EGR flow may be increased (graph 604) by the actuation of the EGR valve in the EGR passage. However, there may be a delay from the time the throttle and EGR valve are actuated and the time that the increased throttle and EGR flow are achieved and received at the cylinder. Specifically, the delay in mixing of EGR gases with intake air to achieve the desired EGR amount/flow and the arriving of the mixed EGR flow at the cylinder may lead to EGR transients that may transiently degrade engine efficiency. Herein, to compensate, the throttle may be transiently opened more than necessary, and the EGR valve may correspondingly be opened proportionate to the throttle to maintain the desired EGR amount in the cylinder. As explained previously, by transiently opening the throttle “more than necessary” it is meant that the throttle is opened more during the initial response to the cylinder air flow request than the amount the throttle would be opened to provide a similar desired cylinder flow amount during steady state conditions. For example, the throttle is transiently opened by a first amount to produce a first throttle flow 610. However, the throttle then begins to close until a second throttle flow 612 is achieved. The second throttle flow 612 is the throttle flow utilized to produce the desired cylinder air flow under steady state conditions. Similar to the throttle flow, the EGR flow may have a first EGR flow 614 that is proportionate to the first throttle flow 610, and may also decrease until the second EGR flow 616 is reached. By adjusting and coordinating the throttle flow and the EGR flow, the desired cylinder air flow may be immediately provided.
At t2, in response to a decrease in requested cylinder air flow, EGR flow and throttle flow may be decreased. In one example, the decrease in EGR flow and throttle flow may be requested during a pedal tip-out. Herein, during the decrease in EGR flow, throttle flow may also be immediately decreased (to allow an immediate drop in cylinder airflow) after which the throttle flow amount may be gradually increased. Thus, the desired cylinder air flow may be rapidly achieved while maintaining the desired EGR amount in the cylinder. At t3, the throttle flow and EGR flow are maintained to provide the desired cylinder air flow during steady state conditions.
It will be appreciated that the configurations and methods disclosed herein are exemplary in nature, and that these specific embodiments are not to be considered in a limiting sense, because numerous variations are possible. For example, the above technology can be applied to V-6, I-4, I-6, V-12, opposed 4, and other engine types. The subject matter of the present disclosure includes all novel and non-obvious combinations and sub-combinations of the various systems and configurations, and other features, functions, and/or properties disclosed herein.
The following claims particularly point out certain combinations and sub-combinations regarded as novel and non-obvious. These claims may refer to “an” element or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof. Such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements. Other combinations and sub-combinations of the disclosed features, functions, elements, and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or through presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such claims, whether broader, narrower, equal, or different in scope to the original claims, also are regarded as included within the subject matter of the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5205260 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5273019 | Matthews et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5934249 | Nanba et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6016788 | Kibe et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6876919 | James et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7016779 | Bowyer | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7117078 | Gangopadhyay | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7270118 | Yamaoka et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273046 | Osumi | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7380447 | Rollinger et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7437874 | Ramamurthy et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7533658 | Chen | May 2009 | B2 |
7676318 | Allain | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7783409 | Kang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
RE42609 | Kurtz et al. | Aug 2011 | E |
8126639 | Roduner et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
RE44452 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2013 | E |
8538644 | Whitney et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8655573 | Hokuto | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8751137 | Takezoe | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8904787 | Styles et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918269 | Irie | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020100454 | Itoyama et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20050114011 | Itoyama | May 2005 | A1 |
20060069494 | Yamada et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070175452 | Yanakiev et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080127938 | Hagari | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090018753 | Muller | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100263627 | Whitney et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110184632 | Kang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20140174413 | Huang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130213353 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |