This application is a U.S. National Phase Application of PCT/CA2017/050859, filed Jul. 17, 2017, which claims priority to Canadian Patent Application No. 2936510, filed Jul. 19, 2016, the contents of which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
This disclosure relates to a transition barrier for connecting a permanent barrier to a temporary barrier. More particularly this disclosure relates to a transitional barrier for use when connecting a permanent road barrier to a temporary road barrier. This is particularly useful in situations where roadwork is conducted and/or road signs are erected (for example the road sign support system described in PCT/CA2016/050585) and also useful in temporary transition barriers.
One existing transition barrier consists of a 4950 mm long steel channel running the length of the transition between a permanent concrete barrier and a temporary concrete barrier with two 6610 mm long steel beam guide rails (SBGR) (one steel beam guide rail fitted matingly atop the other) running the length of the transition and secured onto the steel channel (acting as a stiffener) via 16 mm diameter bolts at 950 mm intervals along the length of the steel channel. The existing system also includes a second 6610 mm long steel channel running the length of the transition just below the two SBGR. One end of each of the i) two 6610 mm long SBGR and ii) 6610 long steel channel running just below the two SBGR is secured onto the permanent concrete barrier with anchor bolts and the other end of each of the i) two 6610 mm long SBGR and ii) 6610 long steel channel running just below the two SBGR is secured onto the temporary concrete barrier with anchor bolts. Experience has shown that the above system is not rigid enough, and creates a pocket in the rail during impact by a vehicle, causing the vehicle to spin around or stop suddenly. Furthermore, if deflection of the vehicle occurs, deflection may cause the temporary transition wall to buckle, or cause the vehicle to snag on the temporary transition wall rather than be re-directed. Both results may cause serious injury to the occupant(s) of the vehicle and/or result in a secondary collision.
Other transition barriers include US 2006/0072967, EP 2020460 B1, EP 2213800 and US 2016/0060832.
There is a need for a transition barrier that may be temporary and/or permanent. There is a need for a temporary transition barrier that mitigates vehicle spin around and/or flip over, during collision into a temporary transition barrier. There is also need for a temporary transition barrier that minimizes deflection upon impact. There is also a need for a temporary transition barrier that complies with the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). MASH is part of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). MASH provides evaluation techniques for the crash testing of safety hardware devices for use on the National highway System (NETS). MASH presents uniform guidelines for crash testing permanent and temporary highway safety features and recommends evaluation criteria to assess test results. The MASH report is available at bookstore.transportation.org. There is also a need for a temporary transition barrier useful with a road sign support system.
According to one aspect, there is provided a transition barrier, preferably a temporary transition barrier, for transition between two median barriers, preferably for transition from a permanent median barrier to a temporary median barrier, said transition barrier comprising:
According to yet another embodiment, said at least one spacer is adjustable in position along said at least one barrier brace. Preferably said at least one spacer is adjustable along the horizontal length of said at least one barrier brace.
According to yet another embodiment, said at least one space is a tube. In one embodiment a resilient tube. In embodiment, an inflexible tube. Preferably said tube having a height similar to the transition wall. In another embodiment said tube having a height similar to the median barrier (preferably said permanent median barrier). Said tube is adjustable along said barrier brace to provide a snug fit between said transition section (preferably transition wall) and said median barrier (preferably said permanent median barrier).
According to yet another aspect, there is provided the use of a transition barrier, preferably a temporary transition barrier, as described herein, with a permanent median barrier and a temporary median barrier.
According to yet another aspect, there is provided a method of forming a transition barrier, preferably a temporary transition barrier, between two median barriers, preferably between a permanent median barrier and a temporary median barrier, said method comprising connecting the transition barrier as described herein to said median barriers, preferably said first end of said transition barrier to one median barrier and said second end of said transition barrier to another median barrier, more preferably connecting a first end of said transition barrier to a permanent median barrier and a second end of said transition barrier to said temporary median barrier, respectively.
In a preferred embodiment, the permanent median barrier is a New Jersey Concrete Safety Shape Barrier (also known as NJ-shape, Jersey and NJ barrier) known to persons of skill in the art. In a preferred embodiment, the transition wall of the temporary transition barrier has a profile of a NJ-shape barrier. The NJ barrier has a profile with a lower wall portion having a sloped face of 55 degrees from the road surface followed by an upper wall portion having a sloped face of 84 degrees from the road surface. Typically, for shallow-angle hits, the vehicle tires ride up on the lower sloped face. The intention being to minimize damage to the sheet metal of a vehicle during a collision with the barrier. For higher impact angles, typically, the front bumper of a vehicle impacts the upper sloped face and slides upwards on the barrier lifting the vehicle. If the bumper is relatively weak, the front end starts to crush before any uplift occurs. Then, as the vehicle becomes more nearly parallel with the barrier, the wheel contacts the lower sloped face of the barrier lifting the vehicle enough to reduce the friction between the tires and the paved surface and assisting in banking and redirecting the vehicle.
Even more preferably, the permanent median barrier is an F-shape barrier. The one difference between the F-shape barrier and the NJ barrier is the distance from the ground to the slope break is 330 mm in NJ barriers, versus 255 mm for F-shape barriers. An F-shaped barrier is not shaped like the letter “F”. F-shape resulted from a study in which various configurations of NJ barriers were labeled A through F, with F being the preferred design. The F-shape barrier has a 75 mm vertical face at the pavement surface and breaks to a sloped face rising to a height of 255 mm at an angle of 55 degrees, and then transitions to a substantially vertical face (84 degrees) to the top of the barrier. The F-shape barrier is also slightly thicker at the top of the wall (229 mm) versus 152.5 mm of the NJ barrier.
According to one embodiment, the transition wall has an F-shape barrier profile.
Even yet more preferably, the permanent median barrier is a 1049 mm Tall Wall New Jersey concrete barrier and the temporary median barrier is a pre-cast F-shape concrete barrier. Preferably the temporary median barrier is secured to a road surface, more preferably the temporary median barrier is secured to a road surface along one side of said temporary median barrier, preferably pinned-down to a road surface. More preferably a pre-cast F-shape concrete barrier is secured to a road surface, preferably pinned-down, more preferably pinned-down to asphalt with a drift pin, preferably a plurality of drift pins, more preferably a plurality of steel drift pins, wherein each of said steel drift pins are preferably of a length and configuration meeting the Ministry of Transportation Ontario Drawing (MTOD) 911 162 January 2010. Preferably the pre-cast F-shape concrete barrier is pinned-down along one side thereof.
According to yet another embodiment, the transition wall has a 1049 mm Tall Wall New Jersey concrete barrier profile.
According to another aspect, there is provided a temporary transition barrier as described herein which is Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) compliant and/or Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code compliant for at least one of wind, seismic and environmental loading. Preferably said temporary transition barrier is MASH compliant for MASH tests 3-20 and 3-22.
MASH is part of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). MASH provides evaluation techniques for the crash testing of safety hardware devices for use on the National Highway System (NHS). MASH presents uniform guidelines for crash testing permanent and temporary highway safety features and recommends evaluation criteria to assess test results. The MASH report is available at bookstore.transportation.org.
The Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code and the AASHTO apply to the design, evaluation, and structural rehabilitation design of fixed and movable highway bridges including provisions for the design of barriers, highway accessory supports of a structural nature, such as lighting poles, and sign support structures.
According to yet another aspect, there is provided a pair of transition barriers as described herein, preferably temporary transition barriers, for use on a road surface having at least two directions of traffic flow, typically separated by a permanent median barrier, wherein one of said pair of transition barriers is erectable along one traffic flow direction and another of said pair of transition barriers is erectable along another traffic flow direction.
According to yet another aspect, there is provided a transition barrier, preferably a temporary transition barrier, as described herein in combination with a support system, preferably a sign support system, more preferably a sign support system as described in our co-pending application CA 2,892,412. Preferably when in combination with a support system, there are at least two transition barriers, preferably at least two temporary transition barriers, as described herein, more preferably a temporary transition barrier one either side of the support system.
Further and other aspects will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description.
Referring now to the Figures, there is shown a transition barrier 10, connected at a first end to the surface of a permanent concrete median barrier 20 and connected at a second end to the end of a temporary concrete median barrier 30. The permanent concrete median barrier 20 in this case is a New Jersey Tall Wall keyed-in barrier. The temporary concrete median barrier 30 in this case is a 32-inch Tall X-bolt (or cross bolt) barrier with cutout. The transition barrier 10 has a transition wall 40 with an outer profile 41 resembling the profile 21 of the permanent concrete median barrier 20 being the New Jersey Tall Wall keyed-in barrier. The outer profile 41 consists of a lower sloped wall 42 transitioning to a higher sloped wall 43. The transition wall 40 is made of steel. It may be made of a number of steel plates suitably joined together at the ends thereof or it may be a single steel plate. If joined together at the ends thereof, the joining technique should be one in which the joined plates will behave as a single steel plate.
The transition wall is further rigidified by a number of spaced apart horizontal braces 50 (
The first end 60 of the transition wall 40 is attached to the surface of the permanent concrete median barrier 20 by a number of socket button head cap screws 61 and hardened flat washers with each screw having a hardened flat washer thereon. Each screw is then fastened in place in a complementary internal threaded insert 63 in the permanent concrete median barrier 20 (
The second end 80 of the transition wall 40 is attached to the end 31 of the temporary median barrier 30 via steel shroud 90 enveloping the end 31 of the temporary median barrier 30 (See
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The following are examples of a temporary transition barrier of the present disclosure undergoing MASH testing.
Evaluation of the temporary transition barrier having a length of 10891.4 mm transitioning from a permanent 1049 mm Tall Wall New Jersey profile concrete median barrier to a temporary pinned-down, precast F-shape concrete barrier with a cross-bolt connection through MASH test 3-20.
The evaluation criteria for test MASH 3-20 includes assessing structural adequacy and occupant risk during impact by a test vehicle. Structural adequacy evaluation criteria includes the test article should contain and redirect the vehicle or bring the vehicle to a controlled stop; the vehicle should not penetrate, underride, or override the installation although controlled lateral deflection of the test article is acceptable (as per TABLE 5-1. A. Safety Evaluation Guidelines of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware 2009). Occupant risk evaluation criteria includes detached elements, fragments, or other debris from the test article should not penetrate or show potential for penetrating the occupant compartment, or present undue hazard to other traffic, pedestrians, or personnel in a work zone. Deformations of, or intrusions into, the occupant compartment should not exceed limits set forth in Section 5.3 as follows: roof ≤4.0 in. (102 mm), windshield-no tear of plastic liner and maximum deformation of 3 in. (76 mm), window-no shattering of a side window resulting from direct contact with a structural member of the test article (this requires the side windows to be in the up position for testing)-in cases where the windows are laminated, the guidelines for windshields will apply, wheel/foot well and toe pan areas ≤9 in. (229 mm), side front panel (forward of A-pillar)≤12 in. (305 mm), front side door area (above seat)≤9 in. (229 mm), front side door area (below seat)≤12 in. (305 mm), and floor pan and transmission tunnel areas ≤12 in. (305 mm); and Appendix E. (as per TABLE 5-1. D. Safety Evaluation Guidelines of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware 2009); the vehicle should remain upright during and after collision-the maximum roll and pitch angles are not to exceed 75 degrees (as per TABLE 5-1. F. Safety Evaluation Guidelines of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware 2009); Occupant impact velocities (OIV) maximum limit for the longitudinal and lateral component is 40 ft/s (12.2 m/s) (as per TABLE 5-1. H. Safety Evaluation Guidelines of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware 2009); and occupant ridedown acceleration maximum limit for longitudinal and lateral component is 20.49G (as per TABLE 5-1. I. Safety Evaluation Guidelines of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware 2009). The temporary pinned-down precast F-shape barrier branched off from the permanent 1049 mm Tall Wall New Jersey profile concrete median barrier until it became parallel to the permanent 1049 mm Tall Wall New Jersey profile concrete median barrier. A second row of the precast pinned barrier branched off on the opposite side of the permanent 1049 mm Tall Wall New Jersey profile concrete median barrier as shown in
MASH test 3-20 involved impacting the temporary transition barrier at the critical impact point (CIP) with a small passenger vehicle (1100 kg test inertia mass) at a target impact speed and angle of 100 km/h and 25 degrees respectively, to the transition barrier. Actual impact speed and angle were within MASH specified tolerances. After the impact, the vehicle was successfully contained and redirected. The maximum occupant impact velocity (OIV) and the ridedown acceleration were within MASH specified tolerances. The temporary transition barrier complied with MASH 3-20.
Evaluation of the temporary transition barrier having a length of 10891.4 mm transitioning from a permanent 1049 mm Tall Wall New Jersey profile concrete median barrier to a temporary pinned-down, precast F-shape concrete barrier with a cross-bolt connection through MASH test 3-21
The conditions of MASH test 3-21 were the same as MASH 3-20 save for the following:
MASH test 3-21 involves impacting the temporary transition barrier at the critical impact point (CIP) with a quad-cab pickup truck (2270 kg test inertia mass) at a target impact speed and angle of 100 km/h and 25 degrees respectively, to the transition barrier. Actual impact speed and angle were within MASH specified tolerances. After the impact, the vehicle was successfully contained and redirected. The maximum occupant impact velocity (OIV) and the ridedown acceleration were within MASH specified tolerances. The temporary transition barrier complied with MASH 3-21.
As many changes can be made to the preferred embodiments without departing from the scope thereof; it is intended that all matter contained herein be considered illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
CA2936510 | Jul 2016 | CA | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2017/050859 | 7/17/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/014121 | 1/25/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4406563 | Urlberger | Sep 1983 | A |
4815565 | Sicking | Mar 1989 | A |
5314261 | Stephens | May 1994 | A |
5527127 | Junker | Jun 1996 | A |
5860762 | Nelson | Jan 1999 | A |
6024341 | Gertz | Feb 2000 | A |
6712545 | Muller et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6926461 | Faller | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7059590 | Bronstad | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7410320 | Faller | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20020000543 | Arthur | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020024043 | Albritton | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030081997 | Kramer | May 2003 | A1 |
20060045617 | Faller | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072967 | Sasse | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20090202296 | Lamore | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20160060832 | Alberson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202006015432 | Feb 2007 | DE |
202006015433 | Feb 2007 | DE |
202006017431 | Feb 2007 | DE |
102008056807 | May 2010 | DE |
2034094 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2213800 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2336427 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2339071 | Jun 2011 | EP |
100538994 | Sep 2005 | KR |
2004009909 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2007103138 | Sep 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/CA2017/050859 dated Oct. 5, 2017. |
Abstract of EP2339071A1. |
Abstract of EP2336427A2. |
Abstract of EP2034094B1. |
Abstract of EP2020460B1. |
Abstract of EP2213800A1. |
AbstractofDE202006017431U1. |
Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 15, 2021 for European Patent Application No. 17830144. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190242080 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |