This application is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 11,616,282 B2, issued Mar. 28, 2023, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
Some devices use electromagnetic signals (e.g., radar) to detect and track objects. For example, many devices include a Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit (MMIC) on a printed circuit board (PCB) for analog signal processing of microwave and/or radar signals, such as power amplification, mixing, and so forth. Substrate Integrated Waveguides (SIWs) provide a low-cost and production-friendly mechanism for routing the microwave and/or radar signals between the MMIC and antenna. However, connecting an MMIC signal port to an SIW poses challenges. To illustrate, an MMIC oftentimes includes differential signal ports for receiving and/or transmitting signals, while SIWs propagate single-ended signals. To conserve space on the PCB, the differential signal ports of the MMIC may be located close together, which may lead to RF power leakage between channels and signal degradation. Shielding structures further compound this problem by reflecting radiated signals back towards a source, causing further signal degradation that adversely impacts detection/tracking accuracy and a field of view of the radar signals.
This document describes techniques, apparatuses, and systems utilizing a high-isolation transition design for differential signal ports. In aspects, a differential input transition structure includes a first layer made of a conductive metal positioned at a bottom of the differential input transition structure. The differential input transition structure also includes a substrate above (and adjacent to) the first layer and a second layer made of the conductive metal, where the differential input transition structure positions the second layer above and adjacent to the substrate. The second layer of the differential input transition structure includes a first section formed to electrically connect a substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) to a first contact point of a differential signal port, the first section including a first stub based on an input impedance of the SIW and a second stub based on a differential input impedance associated with the differential signal port. The second layer of the differential input transition structure also includes a second section separated from the first section, where the second section is formed to electrically connect to a second contact point of the differential signal port and electrically connect to the first layer through a via. The second section includes a third stub associated with the differential input impedance and a pad that electrically connects the via to the second layer.
This Summary introduces simplified concepts related to a high-isolation transition design for differential signal ports, which are further described below in the Detailed Description and Drawings. This Summary is not intended to identify essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended for use in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The details of techniques, apparatuses, and systems utilizing a high-isolation transition design for differential signal ports are described in this document with reference to the following figures. The same numbers are often used throughout the drawings and the detail description to reference like features and components:
Overview
Many industries use radar systems as sensing technology, including the automotive industry, to acquire information about the surrounding environment. Some radar systems include one or more Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMICs) on a printed circuit board (PCB) for processing microwave and/or radar signals. To illustrate, an antenna receives an over-the-air radar signal, which is then routed through a substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) to a receiver port of the MMIC for processing, such as mixing that down-converts a received signal to an intermediate frequency (IF) signal, power amplification that amplifies a transmit signal, and so forth. Thus, the SIW routes signals between the antenna and an MMIC signal port.
Connecting an MMIC signal port to an SIW poses challenges. To illustrate, an MMIC oftentimes implements the signal ports as differential signal ports, while SIWs propagate single-ended signals. Generally, a differential signal corresponds to a differential pair of signals, where signal processing focuses on the electrical difference between the pair of signals instead of a single signal and a ground plane. Conversely, a single-ended signal corresponds to a single signal referenced to the ground plane. Transition structures connect a differential signal to a single-ended signal and/or vice versa. As one example, a transition structure connects the MMIC differential signal port to the single-ended SIW signal port. Alternatively or additionally, other examples include, by way of example and not of limitation, an air waveguide feeding a differential antenna (e.g., for cellular communications), low-voltage differential signaling systems (LVDS), high-voltage differential (HVD) signaling systems, audio systems, display devices, and so forth.
When utilized on a PCB, many factors affect how well the transition structure performs. To illustrate, a PCB oftentimes has limited space, which results in compact designs. MMICs that include multiple differential signal ports may position the differential signal ports close together. Poor isolation between the differential signal ports, and the transition structures connecting the differential signal ports to SIWs, may result in RF power leakage between the different signals and degrade signal quality. Shielding structures further compound this problem by reflecting (leaked) radiated signals back towards a source, causing further signal degradation that adversely impacts detection/tracking accuracy and a field of view of the radar signals. Placing an MMIC and an antenna on opposite sides of a PCB also introduces challenges. Vertical transition structures used to route the signals through the PCB may cause unwanted radio frequency (RF) power loss. Further, the vertical transition structure designs utilize multiple PCB layers (e.g., greater than two), which increases a cost as more layers are added to the vertical transition structure.
This document describes techniques, apparatuses, and systems utilizing a high-isolation transition design for differential signal ports, also referred to as a “differential input transition structure.” In aspects, a first layer of conductive metal, a second layer of the conductive metal, and a substrate positioned between the first layer and the second layer form a two-layer, horizontal differential input transition structure that provides high-isolation between channels and mitigates RF leakage that degrades signal quality. The two-layer, horizontal differential input transition structure also accommodates PCB configurations that place an MMIC and antenna on a same side, thus mitigating unwanted RF power loss. Using two layers relative to multiple PCB layers (e.g., greater than two) also helps reduce production costs. In other aspects, the differential input transition structure may be implemented using a single layer of a low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) material that feeds electromagnetic signals into other LTCC structures (e.g., an antenna, laminated waveguide).
As one example of a differential input transition structure, the second layer of the two-layer, horizontal differential input transition structure includes a first section formed to electrically connect a SIW to a first contact point of a differential signal port, where the first section includes (i) a first stub based on an input impedance of the SIW, and (ii) a second stub based on a differential input impedance associated with the differential signal port. The second layer of the two-layer, horizontal differential input transition structure also includes a second section formed to electrically connect to a second contact point of the differential signal port and electrically connect to the first layer through a via. In aspects, the second section includes a third stub associated with the differential input impedance and a pad that electrically connects the via to the second layer. This is just one example of the described techniques, apparatuses, and systems of a high-isolation transition design for differential signal ports. This document describes other examples and implementations.
Example System
The system 100 includes a two-layer, horizontal differential input transition structure 110 (differential input transition structure 110) constructed from the first layer 104, the substrate 106, and the second layer 108. To illustrate, the differential input transition structure forms a first section 112 and a second section 114 using the second layer 108. The first section includes a stub 116 that has a size and/or shape based on impedance characteristics of a contact point, illustrated here as a substrate integrated waveguide 118 (SIWs). For example, a shape, size, and/or form of the SIW 118 (e.g., number of vias included, spacing between vias) may be based on an operating frequency and/or frequency range of signals being routed by the SIW. In turn, this may impact a shape and/or size of the stub 116. In aspects, the differential input transition structure 110 places the stub 116 at an entrance of the SIW 118. The second section 114 electrically connects the second layer 108 to the first layer 104 using a via 120 and a pad 122. Because the via 120 connects to both the second layer 108 and the first layer 104, and assuming the first layer 104 includes the ground plane, the via 120 routes the signal to the ground plane, which forces a 180° phase shift in the signal and allows a transition between a single-ended signal and a differential signal. In other words, introducing the 180° phase shift allows the differential signals to be summed together at a common point. The differential input transition structure 110 also separates the second section 114, or the pad 122, from the SIW 118 such that the pad 122 is (electrically) disconnected and separated from the SIW 118. The portion of the second layer that forms the second section of the differential input transition structure 110 and/or the pad does not physically touch the portion of the second layer that forms part of the SIW 118.
A first section 210 of the differential input transition structure (e.g., formed using a second layer of a PCB) includes a first stub 212 placed at an entrance of the SIW 204 and a second stub 214 that connects to a first signal ball 216 of the differential signal port 206. A second section 218 of the differential input transition structure 202 (e.g., also formed using the second layer of the PCB) includes a third stub 220 and a pad 222. The third stub 220 connects to a second signal ball 224 of the differential signal port 206, while the pad 222 electrically connects the second layer of the PCB to a first layer of the PCB (not shown) using a via 226. The first signal ball 216 and the second signal ball 224 are illustrated in the
The size and/or shape of the first stub 212 may be based on a combination of factors. To illustrate, the first stub 212 has a rectangular shape with a width 228 and a height 230 based on an input impedance of the SIW 204. Alternatively or additionally, the size and/or shape of the first stub 212 may be based on a material of the substrate (e.g., substrate 106 in
In aspects, the size and/or shape of the pad 222 may be based on a size and/or shape of the via 226. For example, in the system 200, the pad 222 has a rectangular shape with a width 232 and a height 234, where the width 232 generally has a length of 0.35 millimeters (mm) and the height 234 generally has a length of 0.35 mm, each within a threshold value of error. In some aspects, the threshold value of error corresponds to a percentage of error, such as 0.1% error, 0.5% error, 1% error, 5% error, and so forth.
The size and shape of the second stub 214 and/or the third stub 220 may alternatively or additionally be based on any combination of an input impedance of the differential signal port 206, a substrate material, a dielectric property of the substrate, a thickness of a PCB used to implement the differential input transition structure 202, an operating frequency of the differential input transition structure 202, the SIW 204, and/or the differential signal port 206, and so forth. Some aspects determine the size and/or shape of the second stub 214 and the third stub 220 jointly. In other words, the size and/or shape of the second stub 214 and the third stub 220 depend on one another. As one example, the size and/or shape of the second stub 214 and the third stub 220 are based on jointly forming a quarter-wave impedance transformer for a microwave and/or radar signal transmitted and/or received by the MMIC 208 through the signal balls 216 and 224. Example frequency ranges include the millimeter band defined as 40-100 Gigahertz (GHz), the Ka band defined as 25.5-40 GHz, the K band defined as 18-26.6 GHz, and the Ku band defined as 12.5-18 GHz.
Transmit substrate integrated waveguide 310 (TX SIW 310) connects to a first balun-with-delay structure 312, transmit substrate integrated waveguide 314 (TX SIW 314) connects to a first differential input transition structure 316, and transmit substrate integrated waveguide 318 (TX SIW 318) connects to a second balun-with-delay structure 320. The first balun-with-delay structure 312, the first differential input transition structure 316, and the second balun-with-delay structure 320 each connect to a respective transmit differential signal ball pair of the transmit differential signal ports 306. In a similar manner, receive substrate integrated waveguide 322 (RX SIW 322), receive substrate integrated waveguide 324 (RX SIW 324), receive substrate integrated waveguide 326 (RX SIW 326), and receive substrate integrated waveguide 328 (RX SIW 328) each connect to a respective receive differential signal ball pair of the receive differential signal ports 308 using, respectively, either a balun-with-delay structure or a differential input transition structure. Each connection to a SIW (e.g., a receive SIW, a transmit SIW), whether using a differential input transition structure or a balun-with-delay structure, corresponds to a single-ended signal connection. Similarly, each connection to a differential signal port, whether using a differential input transition structure or a balun-with-delay structure, corresponds to a differential signal connection.
The combination and placement of the differential input transition structures and the balun-with-delay-structures help to improve isolation between the signal channels. As one example, the combination shown in image 330 places structures with different radiation patterns next to one another to reduce RF coupling. The image 330 represents an enlarged view of receive-side functionality included in the system 300. The receive differential signal ports 308 are individually labeled as receive differential signal port 332, receive differential signal port 334, receive differential signal port 336, and receive differential signal port 338. These connections are shown as dashed lines to denote the signal ports are within and/or are part of the MMIC 302. While the image 330 illustrates receive-side functionality, the various aspects described may alternatively or additionally pertain to transmit-side functionality.
A third balun-with-delay structure 340 of the system 300 connects to the RX SIW 322 and the receive differential signal port 332 using a first section 342 and a second section 344. The first section 342 includes a delay line that introduces a 180° phase shift in a signal carried by the first section and a stub (e.g., an impedance-matching stub), while the second section 344 includes a stub. The 180° phase shift allows the differential signals to be summed together at a common point. The system 300 also positions a second differential input transition structure 346 next to the balun-with-delay-structure 340. In some aspects, the second differential input transition structure 346 corresponds to the differential input transition structure 202 of
On the receive side, a third differential input transition structure 348 and a fourth balun-with-delay structure 350 mirror the positioning of the second differential input transition structure 346 and the third balun-with-delay structure 340. The third differential input transition structure 348 connects to the RX SIW 326 and the receive differential signal ports 336, while the fourth balun-with-delay structure 350 connects to the RX SIW 328 and the receive differential signal ports 338. Because the second differential input transition structure 346 and the third differential input transition structure 348 are located next to one another, mirroring or flipping the section locations from one another helps improve channel isolation and reduce RF leakage between the channels. To illustrate, because the second differential input transition structure 346 and the third differential input transition structure 348 have similar radiation patterns, flipping and/or mirroring the section placement helps separate the propagation of the radiation patterns and reduces RF leakage. The isolation between the second differential input transition structure 346 and the third differential input transition structure 348 may be proportional to a distance between the respective vias of each differential input transition structure (e.g., further distance improves isolation). Thus, the system 300 positions a first section 352 of the differential input transition structure 346 next to a first section 354 of the differential input transition structure 348. This positions a second section 356 of the differential input transition structure 346 and a second section 358 of the differential input transition structure 348, the second section 356 and the second section 358 each housing a respective via, away from each other instead of next to each other (e.g., like the first sections) and further improves the isolation between channels.
While the example 300 shows a combination of differential input transition structure and balun-with-delay structure, alternate implementations may only use differential input transition structures. For example, with reference to the image 330, some implementations may replace the balun-with-delay structure 340 with a differential input transition structure (whose section placement may mirror the sections of the differential input transition structure 346) and/or the balun-with-delay structure 350 with a differential input transition structure (whose section placement may mirror the sections of the differential input transition structure 348).
The shielding structure 406 also covers transmit differential signal ports 414, receive differential signal ports 416, transmit-side balun-with-delay and/or differential input transition structures 418, and receive-side balun-with-delay and/or differential input transition structures 420. In some aspects, the shielding structure 406 covers portions of the SIWs. To illustrate, the PCB 410 includes three transmit SIW, denoted by reference line 422, and four receive SIWs, denoted by reference line 424. Each transmit SIW connects to a respective structure of the transmit-side balun-with-delay and/or differential input transition structures 418 and an antenna with transmit capabilities. Similarly, each receive SIW connects to a respective structure of the receive-side balun-with-delay and/or differential input transition structures 420 and an antenna with receive capabilities. In aspects, the shielding structure 406 covers a portion of each receive SIW and transmit SIW (e.g., the portion that connects to the respective balun-with-delay and/or differential input transition structures). Thus, the shielding structure 406 covers the MMIC 408 and the various structures used to connect a single-ended signal to a differential signal. Alternatively or additionally, the shielding structure 406 covers thermal conductive and electromagnetic absorbing material as further described. In some aspects, the MMIC 408, the transmit differential signal ports 414, the receive differential signal ports 416, the transmit-side balun-with-delay and/or differential input transition structures 418, the receive-side balun-with-delay and/or differential input transition structures 420, the transmit SIWs, and the receive SIWs correspond to those described with reference to
The shielding structure 406 illustrated in the example system 400 has a rectangular shape with a width 426 and a height 428. However, any other suitable geometric shape can be utilized. In one example, the width 426 generally has a length of 15.2 mm within a threshold value of error, and the height 428 generally has a length of 15.2 mm within the threshold value of error. In some aspects, the threshold value of error corresponds to a percentage of error, such as 0.1% error, 0.5% error, 1% error, 5% error, and so forth.
Side view 404 illustrates an expanded and rotated view of a portion of the system 400. The side view 404 includes the shielding structure 406, the PCB 410, and a metal lid 432. As further shown, the shielding structure 406 has a thickness 434. In one example, the thickness 434 generally has a length of 1.85 mm within a threshold value of error. In some aspects, the threshold value of error corresponds to a percentage of error, such as 0.1% error, 0.5% error, 1% error, 5% error, and so forth.
Two-layer, horizontal differential input transition structures (e.g., differential input transition structures) provide high-isolation between channels for differential signal-to-single-ended signals and mitigate RF leakage that degrades signal quality. The two-layer, horizontal differential input transition structures also accommodate PCB configurations that place an MMIC and antenna on a same side and mitigate unwanted RF power loss. Using two layers relative to multiple PCB layers (e.g., greater than two) also helps reduce production costs by reducing a number of layers included in the design. However, in other aspects, the differential input transition structure may be implemented using a single layer of a low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) material that feeds electromagnetic signals into other LTCC structures (e.g., an antenna, laminated waveguide). In some aspects, placing differential input transition structures next to other transition structures, such as balun-with-delay structures, reduces RF coupling by placing different radiation patterns next to one another. However, alternate implementations only use differential input transition structures.
In the following section, additional examples of a high-isolation transition design for differential signal ports are provided.
Example 1: A differential input transition structure comprising: a first layer made of a conductive metal and positioned at a bottom of the differential input transition structure; a substrate positioned above and adjacent to the first layer; and a second layer made of the conductive metal and positioned above and adjacent to the substrate, the second layer comprising: a first section formed to electrically connect a single-ended signal contact point to a first contact point of a differential signal port, the first section including a first stub based on an input impedance of the SIW and a second stub based on a differential input impedance associated with the differential signal port; and a second section separated from the first section, the second section formed to electrically connect to a second contact point of the differential signal port and electrically connected to the first layer through a via, the second section including a third stub associated with the differential input impedance and a pad that electrically connects the via to the second layer.
Example 2: The differential input transition structure as recited in example 1, wherein the second section of the second layer is disconnected and separated from the single-ended signal contact point.
Example 3: The differential input transition structure as recited in example 1, wherein the second stub of the first section and the third stub of the second section form a quarter-wave impedance transformer.
Example 4: The differential input transition structure as recited in example 3, wherein the quarter-wave impedance transformer is based on a waveform in a frequency range of 70 to 85 gigahertz (GHz).
Example 5: The differential input transition structure as recited in example 1, wherein the via that connects the second layer to the first layer, and the pad shaped to encompass the via are positioned at an entrance of a substrate integrated waveguide (SIW), the SIW being the single-ended signal contact point.
Example. 6: The differential input transition structure as recited in example 1, wherein the differential input impedance is based on a monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) transmitter or receiver port.
Example 7: The differential input transition structure as recited in example 1, wherein the first stub, the second stub, or the third stub has a size based on at least one of: an operating frequency of the differential signal port or the single-ended signal contact point; a combined thickness of the first layer, the substrate, and the second layer; or a material of the substrate.
Example 8: The differential input transition structure as recited in example 7, wherein the first stub has a rectangular shape with a width of 43 millimeters (mm) within a threshold value of error and a height of 43 mm within the threshold value of error.
Example 9: A system comprising: a monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) with one or more differential signal ports; one or more substrate integrated waveguides (SIWs); one or more balun-with-delay structures; and one or more differential input transition structures, each differential input transition comprising: a first layer made of a conductive metal and positioned at a bottom of the differential input transition structure; a substrate positioned above and adjacent to the first layer; and a second layer made of the conductive metal and positioned above and adjacent to the substrate, the second layer comprising: a first section that electrically connects a respective SIW of the one or more SIWs to a respective differential signal port of the one or more differential signal ports, the first section including a first stub based on an SIW input impedance of the respective SIW and a second stub based on a differential input impedance of the respective differential signal port; and a second section separated from the first section, the second section electrically connected to the respective differential signal port and electrically connected to the first layer through a via, the second section including a third stub associated with the differential input impedance of the respective differential signal port and including a pad shaped to encompass the via.
Example 10: The system as recited in example 9, wherein the system includes: a first balun-with-delay structure of the one or more balun-with-delay structures that connects to a first differential signal port of the one or more differential signal ports of the MMIC; and a first differential input transition structure of the one or more differential input transition structures that connects to a second differential signal port of the one or more differential signal ports of the MMIC, wherein the first differential signal port is located next to the second differential signal port, and wherein the first balun-with-delay structure is located next to the first differential input transition structure.
Example 11: The system as recited in example 10, wherein: the first differential signal port is a first transmit port of the MMIC, the second differential signal port is a second transmit port of the MMIC, the first balun-with-delay structure connects the first transmit port to a first SIW of the one or more SIWs, and the first differential signal port connects the second transmit port to a second SIW of the one or more SIWs.
Example 12: The system as recited in example 10, wherein: the first differential signal port is a first receive port of the MMIC, the second differential signal port is a second receive port of the MMIC, the first balun-with-delay structure connects the first receive port to a first SIW of the one or more SIWs, and the first differential signal port connects the second receive port to a second SIW of the one or more SIWs.
Example 13: The system as recited in example 12, wherein the system further comprises: a second differential input transition structure of the one or more differential input transition structures that connects a third differential signal port of the one or more differential signal ports of the MMIC to a third SIW of the one or more SIWs, the third differential signal port being a third receive port of the MMIC; wherein the second differential input transition structure is located next to the first differential input transition structure, and wherein the second differential input transition structure is flipped relative to the first differential input transition structure such that: the first section of the first differential input transition structure is located next to the first section of the second differential input transition structure; and the second section of the first differential input transition structure is located next to the first balun-with-delay structure.
Example 14: The system as recited in example 13, wherein the system includes: a second balun-with-delay structure of the one or more balun-with-delay structures that connects a fourth differential signal port of the one or more differential signal ports of the MMIC to a fourth SIW of the one or more SIWs, the fourth differential signal port being a fourth receive port of the MMIC, wherein the second balun-with-delay structure is located next to the second section of the second differential input transition structure.
Example 15: The system as recited in example 9, further comprising: a metal shield positioned over the MMIC, the one or more balun-with-delay structures, and the one or more differential input transition structures.
Example 16: The system as recited in example 15, wherein a size of the shield comprises: a width of 15.2 millimeters (mm) within a threshold value of error; and a length of 15.2 mm within the threshold value of error.
Example 17: The system as recited in example 9, wherein, for at least one differential input transition structure of the one or more differential input transition structures, the second stub of the first section and the third stub of the second section, in combination, form a quarter-wave impedance transformer.
Example 18: The system as recited in example 17, wherein the second stub of the first section and the third stub of the second section, in combination, form the quarter-wave impedance transformer based on a waveform in a frequency range of 70 to 85 gigahertz (GHz).
Example 19: The system as recited in example 9, wherein, for at least one differential input transition structure of the one or more differential input transition structures, the system positions the pad and the via of the second section at an entrance of at least one SIW of the one or more SIWs. Example 20: The system as recited in example 9, wherein, for at least one differential input transition structure of the one or more differential input transition structures, the first stub included in the first section has a size comprising: a width of 0.42 millimeters (mm) within a threshold value of error; and a length of 0.43 mm within the threshold value of error.
While various embodiments of the disclosure are described in the foregoing description and shown in the drawings, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited thereto but may be variously embodied to practice within the scope of the following claims. From the foregoing description, it will be apparent that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the following claims.
The use of “or” and grammatically related terms indicates non-exclusive alternatives without limitation unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, a phrase referring to “at least one” of a list of items refers to any combination of those items, including single members. As an example, “at least one of: a, b, or c” is intended to cover a, b, c, a-b, a-c, b-c, and a-b-c, as well as any combination with multiples of the same element (e.g., a-a, a-a-a, a-a-b, a-a-c, a-b-b, a-c-c, b-b, b-b-b, b-b-c, c-c, and c-c-c or any other ordering of a, b, and c).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2851686 | Hagaman | Sep 1958 | A |
3029432 | Hansen | Apr 1962 | A |
3032762 | Kerr | May 1962 | A |
3328800 | Algeo | Jun 1967 | A |
3462713 | Knerr | Aug 1969 | A |
3473162 | Veith | Oct 1969 | A |
3579149 | Ramsey | May 1971 | A |
3594806 | Black et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3597710 | Levy | Aug 1971 | A |
3852689 | Watson | Dec 1974 | A |
4157516 | Grijp | Jun 1979 | A |
4291312 | Kaloi | Sep 1981 | A |
4453142 | Murphy | Jun 1984 | A |
4562416 | Sedivec | Dec 1985 | A |
4590480 | Nikolayuk et al. | May 1986 | A |
4839663 | Kurtz | Jun 1989 | A |
5030965 | Park et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5047738 | Wong et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5065123 | Heckaman et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068670 | Maoz | Nov 1991 | A |
5113197 | Luh | May 1992 | A |
5337065 | Bonnet et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5350499 | Shibaike et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5541612 | Josefsson | Jul 1996 | A |
5638079 | Kastner et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5923225 | Santos | Jul 1999 | A |
5926147 | Sehm et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5982256 | Uchimura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986527 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6072375 | Adkins et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6166701 | Park et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6414573 | Swineford et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6489855 | Kitamori et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6535083 | Hageman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6622370 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6788918 | Saitoh et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794950 | Toit et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6859114 | Eleftheriades et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6867660 | Kitamori et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6958662 | Salmela et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6992541 | Wright et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7002511 | Ammar et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7091919 | Bannon | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7142165 | Sanchez et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7420442 | Forman | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7439822 | Shimura et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7495532 | McKinzie, III | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498994 | Vacanti | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7626476 | Kim et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659799 | Jun et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7886434 | Forman | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7973616 | Shijo et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7994879 | Kim et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8013694 | Hiramatsu et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8089327 | Margomenos et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8159316 | Miyazato et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8395552 | Geiler et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8451175 | Gummalla et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8451189 | Fluhler | May 2013 | B1 |
8576023 | Buckley et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8604990 | Chen et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8692731 | Lee et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8717124 | Vanhille et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8803638 | Kildal | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8948562 | Norris et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9007269 | Lee et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9203139 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9203155 | Choi et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9246204 | Kabakian | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9258884 | Saito | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9356238 | Norris et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9368878 | Chen et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9450281 | Kim | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9537212 | Rosen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9647313 | Marconi et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9653773 | Ferrari et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9653819 | Izadian | May 2017 | B1 |
9673532 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9806393 | Kildal et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9806431 | Izadian | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9813042 | Xue et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9843301 | Rodgers et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9882288 | Black et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9935065 | Baheti et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9991606 | Kirino et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
9997842 | Kirino et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10027032 | Kirino et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10042045 | Kirino et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10090600 | Kirino et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10114067 | Lam et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10153533 | Kirino | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10158158 | Kirino et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10164318 | Seok et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10164344 | Kirino et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10186787 | Wang et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10218078 | Kirino et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10230173 | Kirino et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10263310 | Kildal et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10283832 | Chayat et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10312596 | Gregoire | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10315578 | Kim et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10320083 | Kirino et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10333227 | Kirino et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10374323 | Kamo et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10381317 | Maaskant et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10381741 | Kirino et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10439298 | Kirino et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10468736 | Mangaiahgari | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10505282 | Lilja | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10534061 | Vassilev et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10559889 | Kirino et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10594045 | Kirino et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10601144 | Kamo et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10608345 | Kirino et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10613216 | Vacanti et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10622696 | Kamo et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10627502 | Kirino et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10649461 | Han et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10651138 | Kirino et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10651567 | Kamo et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10658760 | Kamo et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10670810 | Sakr et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10705294 | Guerber et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10707584 | Kirino et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10714802 | Kirino et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10727561 | Kirino et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10727611 | Kirino et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10763590 | Kirino et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10763591 | Kirino et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10775573 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10811373 | Zaman et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10826147 | Sikina et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10833382 | Sysouphat | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10833385 | Mangaiahgari | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10892536 | Fan et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10944184 | Shi et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10957971 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10957988 | Kirino et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10962628 | Laifenfeld et al. | Mar 2021 | B1 |
10971824 | Baumgartner et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10983194 | Patel et al. | Apr 2021 | B1 |
10985434 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10992056 | Kamo et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11061110 | Kamo et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11088432 | Seok et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11088464 | Sato et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11114733 | Doyle et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11121441 | Rmili et al. | Sep 2021 | B1 |
11121475 | Yang et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11169325 | Guerber et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11171399 | Alexanian et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11196171 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11201414 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11249011 | Challener | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11283162 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11289787 | Yang | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11349183 | Rahiminejad et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11349220 | Alexanian et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11378683 | Alexanian et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11411292 | Kirino | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11444364 | Shi | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11495871 | Vosoogh et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11563259 | Alexanian et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11611138 | Ogawa et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11616282 | Yao et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11626652 | Vilenskiy et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
20020021197 | Elco | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030052828 | Scherzer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040041663 | Uchimura et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040069984 | Estes et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040090290 | Teshirogi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040174315 | Miyata | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050146474 | Bannon | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050237253 | Kuo et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060038724 | Tikhov et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060113598 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060158382 | Nagai | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070013598 | Artis et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070054064 | Ohmi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070103381 | Upton | May 2007 | A1 |
20080129409 | Nagaishi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150821 | Koch et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090040132 | Sridhar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090207090 | Pettus et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090243762 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090243766 | Miyagawa et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300901 | Artis et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100134376 | Margomenos et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100321265 | Yamaguchi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110181482 | Adams et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120013421 | Hayata | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120050125 | Leiba et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056776 | Shijo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068316 | Ligander | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120163811 | Doany et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120194399 | Bily et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120242421 | Robin et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120256796 | Leiba | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280770 | Abhari et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130057358 | Anthony et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082801 | Rofougaran et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130300602 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140015709 | Shijo et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140091884 | Flatters | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106684 | Burns et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140327491 | Kim et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150097633 | Devries et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150229017 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150229027 | Sonozaki et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150263429 | Vahidpour et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150333726 | Xue et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150357698 | Kushta | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150364804 | Tong et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150364830 | Tong et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160043455 | Seler et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160049714 | Ligander et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160056541 | Tageman et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160118705 | Tang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160126637 | Jemichi | May 2016 | A1 |
20160195612 | Shi | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160204495 | Takeda et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160211582 | Saraf | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160276727 | Dang et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160293557 | Topak et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160301125 | Kim et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170003377 | Menge | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170012335 | Boutayeb | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170084554 | Dogiamis et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170288313 | Chung et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170294719 | Tatomir | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170324135 | Blech et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180013208 | Zadian et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180032822 | Frank et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180123245 | Toda et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180131084 | Park et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180212324 | Tatomir | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180226709 | Mangaiahgari | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233465 | Spella et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180254563 | Sonozaki et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180284186 | Chadha et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180301819 | Kirino et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180301820 | Bregman et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180343711 | Wixforth et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180351261 | Kamo et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180375185 | Kirino et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190006743 | Kirino et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190013563 | Takeda et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190057945 | Maaskant et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190109361 | Ichinose et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190115644 | Wang et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190187247 | Izadian et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190245276 | Li et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190252778 | Duan | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190260137 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190324134 | Cattle | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200021001 | Mangaiahgari | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200044360 | Kamo et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200059002 | Renard et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200064483 | Li et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200076086 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200106171 | Shepeleva et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200112077 | Kamo et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200166637 | Hess et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200203849 | Lim et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200212594 | Kirino et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200235453 | Lang | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200284907 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200287293 | Shi et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200319293 | Kuriyama et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200343612 | Shi | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200346581 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200373678 | Park et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210028528 | Alexanian et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210036393 | Mangaiahgari | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210104818 | Li et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210110217 | Gunel | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210159577 | Carlred et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210218154 | Shi et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210242581 | Rossiter et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210249777 | Alexanian et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210305667 | Bencivenni | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20220094071 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220109246 | Emanuelsson et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220196794 | Foroozesh et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2654470 | Dec 2007 | CA |
1254446 | May 2000 | CN |
1620738 | May 2005 | CN |
2796131 | Jul 2006 | CN |
101584080 | Nov 2009 | CN |
201383535 | Jan 2010 | CN |
201868568 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102157787 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102420352 | Apr 2012 | CN |
103326125 | Sep 2013 | CN |
203277633 | Nov 2013 | CN |
103490168 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103515682 | Jan 2014 | CN |
102142593 | Jun 2014 | CN |
104101867 | Oct 2014 | CN |
104900956 | Sep 2015 | CN |
104993254 | Oct 2015 | CN |
105071019 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105609909 | May 2016 | CN |
105680133 | Jun 2016 | CN |
105958167 | Sep 2016 | CN |
107317075 | Nov 2017 | CN |
108258392 | Jul 2018 | CN |
109286081 | Jan 2019 | CN |
109643856 | Apr 2019 | CN |
109980361 | Jul 2019 | CN |
110085990 | Aug 2019 | CN |
209389219 | Sep 2019 | CN |
110401022 | Nov 2019 | CN |
111123210 | May 2020 | CN |
111480090 | Jul 2020 | CN |
108376821 | Oct 2020 | CN |
110474137 | Nov 2020 | CN |
109326863 | Dec 2020 | CN |
112241007 | Jan 2021 | CN |
212604823 | Feb 2021 | CN |
112986951 | Jun 2021 | CN |
112290182 | Jul 2021 | CN |
113193323 | Oct 2021 | CN |
214706247 | Nov 2021 | CN |
112017006415 | Sep 2019 | DE |
102019200893 | Jul 2020 | DE |
0174579 | Mar 1986 | EP |
0818058 | Jan 1998 | EP |
2267841 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2500978 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2843758 | Mar 2015 | EP |
2766224 | Dec 2018 | EP |
3460903 | Mar 2019 | EP |
3785995 | Mar 2021 | EP |
3862773 | Aug 2021 | EP |
4089840 | Nov 2022 | EP |
893008 | Apr 1962 | GB |
2463711 | Mar 2010 | GB |
2489950 | Oct 2012 | GB |
2000183222 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2003198242 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003289201 | Oct 2003 | JP |
5269902 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2013187752 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2015216533 | Dec 2015 | JP |
20080044752 | May 2008 | KR |
1020080044752 | May 2008 | KR |
20080105396 | Dec 2008 | KR |
101092846 | Dec 2011 | KR |
102154338 | Sep 2020 | KR |
9934477 | Jul 1999 | WO |
2013189513 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2018003932 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2018052335 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2019085368 | May 2019 | WO |
2020082363 | Apr 2020 | WO |
2021072380 | Apr 2021 | WO |
2022122319 | Jun 2022 | WO |
2022225804 | Oct 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 18153137.7, dated Jun. 15, 2018, 8 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 20155296.5, dated Jul. 13, 2020, 12 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 20166797, dated Sep. 16, 2020, 11 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21211165.2, dated May 13, 2022, 12 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21211167.8, dated May 19, 2022, 10 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21211168.6, dated May 13, 2022, 11 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21211452.4, dated May 16, 2022, 10 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21211474.8, dated Apr. 20, 2022, 14 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21211478.9, dated May 19, 2022, 10 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21212703.9, dated May 3, 2022, 13 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21215901.6, dated Jun. 9, 2022, 8 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21216319.0, dated Jun. 10, 2022, 12 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 22160898.7, dated Aug. 4, 2022, 11 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 22166998.9, dated Sep. 9, 2022, 12 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 22183888.1, dated Dec. 20, 2022, 10 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 22183892.3, dated Dec. 2, 2022, 8 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201810122408.4, dated Jun. 2, 2021, 15 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201810122408.4, dated Oct. 18, 2021, 19 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202010146513.9, dated Feb. 7, 2022, 14 pages. |
“WR-90 Waveguides”, Pasternack Enterprises, Inc., 2016, Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160308205114/http://www.pasternack.com:80/wr-90-waveguides-category.aspx, 2 pages. |
Adams, et al., “Dual Band Frequency Scanned, Height Finder Antenna”, 1991 21st European Microwave Conference, 1991, 6 pages. |
Alhuwaimel, et al., “Performance Enhancement of a Slotted Waveguide Antenna by Utilizing Parasitic Elements”, Sep. 7, 2015, pp. 1303-1306. |
Furtula, et al., “Waveguide Bandpass Filters for Millimeter-Wave Radiometers”, Journal of Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves, 2013, 9 pages. |
Gray, et al., “Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic Slotted Waveguide Antenna”, Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference 2010, pp. 307-310. |
Hausman, “Termination Insensitive Mixers”, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electronic Systems (COMCAS 2011), Nov. 7, 2011, 13 pages. |
Huang, et al., “The Rectangular Waveguide Board Wall Slot Array Antenna Integrated with One Dimensional Subwavelength Periodic Corrugated Grooves and Artificially Soft Surface Structure”, Dec. 20, 2008, 10 pages. |
Jankovic, et al., “Stepped Bend Substrate Integrated Waveguide to Rectangular Waveguide Transitions”, Jun. 2016, 2 pages. |
Li, et al., “Millimetre-wave slotted array antenna based on double-layer substrate integrated waveguide”, Jun. 1, 2015, pp. 882-888. |
Lin, et al., “A THz Waveguide Bandpass Filter Design Using an Artificial Neural Network”, Micromachines 13(6), May 2022, 11 pages. |
Mak, et al., “A Magnetoelectric Dipole Leaky-Wave Antenna for Millimeter-Wave Application”, Dec. 12, 2017, pp. 6395-6402. |
Mallahzadeh, et al., “A Low Cross-Polarization Slotted Ridged SIW Array Antenna Design With Mutual Coupling Considerations”, Jul. 17, 2015, pp. 4324-4333. |
Ogiwara, et al., “2-D MoM Analysis of the Choke Structure for Isolation Improvement between Two Waveguide Slot Array Antennas”, Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference 2007, 4 pages. |
Razmhosseini, et al., “Parasitic Slot Elements for Bandwidth Enhancement of Slotted Waveguide Antennas”, 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference, Sep. 2019, 5 pages. |
Rossello, et al., “Substrate Integrated Waveguide Aperture Coupled Patch Antenna Array for 24 GHz Wireless Backhaul and Radar Applications”, Nov. 16, 2014, 2 pages. |
Schneider, et al., “A Low-Loss W-Band Frequency-Scanning Antenna for Wideband Multichannel Radar Applications”, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 18, No. 4, Apr. 2019, pp. 806-810. |
Serrano, et al., “Lowpass Filter Design for Space Applications in Waveguide Technology Using Alternative Topologies”, Jan. 2013, 117 pages. |
Shehab, et al., “Substrate-Integrated-Waveguide Power Dividers”, Oct. 15, 2019, pp. 27-38. |
Wang, et al., “Low-loss frequency scanning planar array with hybrid feeding structure for low-altitude detection radar”, Sep. 13, 2019, pp. 6708-6711. |
Wang, et al., “Mechanical and Dielectric Strength of Laminated Epoxy Dielectric Graded Materials”, Mar. 2020, 15 pages. |
Wu, et al., “A Planar W-Band Large-Scale High-Gain Substrate-Integrated Waveguide Slot Array”, Feb. 3, 2020, pp. 6429-6434. |
Xu, et al., “CPW Center-Fed Single-Layer SIW Slot Antenna Array for Automotive Radars”, Jun. 12, 2014, pp. 4528-4536. |
Yu, et al., “Optimization and Implementation of SIW Slot Array for Both Medium- and Long-Range 77 GHz Automotive Radar Application”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 66, No. 7, Jul. 2018, pp. 3769-3774. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 22184924.3, dated Dec. 2, 2022, 13 pages. |
Bauer, et al., “A wideband transition from substrate integrated waveguide to differential microstrip lines in multilayer substrates”, Sep. 2010, pp. 811-813. |
Chaloun, et al., “A Wideband 122 GHz Cavity-Backed Dipole Antenna for Millimeter-Wave Radar Altimetry”, 2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), Mar. 15, 2020, 4 pages. |
Deutschmann, et al., “A Full W-Band Waveguide-to-Differential Microstrip Transition”, Jun. 2019, pp. 335-338. |
Giese, et al., “Compact Wideband Single-ended and Differential Microstrip-to-waveguide Transitions at W-band”, Jul. 2015, 4 pages. |
Hansen, et al., “D-Band FMCW Radar Sensor for Industrial Wideband Applications with Fully-Differential MMIC-to-RWG Interface in SIW”, 2021 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, Jun. 7, 2021, pp. 815-818. |
Hasan, et al., “F-Band Differential Microstrip Patch Antenna Array and Waveguide to Differential Microstrip Line Transition for FMCW Radar Sensor”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 19, No. 15, Aug. 1, 2019, pp. 6486-6496. |
Tong, et al., “A Wide Band Transition from Waveguide to Differential Microstrip Lines”, Dec. 2008, 5 pages. |
Wang, et al., “A 79-GHz LTCC differential microstrip line to laminated waveguide transition using high permittivity material”, Dec. 2010, pp. 1593-1596. |
Wu, et al., “The Substrate Integrated Circuits—A New Concept for High-Frequency Electronics and Optoelectronics”, Dec. 2003, 8 pages. |
Yuasa, et al., “A millimeter wave wideband differential line to waveguide transition using short ended slot line”, Oct. 2014, pp. 1004-1007. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 23158037.4, dated Aug. 17, 2023, 9 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 23158947.4, dated Aug. 17, 2023, 11 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202111550163.3, dated Jun. 17, 2023, 25 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202111550448.7, dated Jun. 17, 2023, 19 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202111551711.4, dated Jun. 17, 2023, 29 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202111551878.0, dated Jun. 15, 2023, 20 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202111563233.9, dated May 31, 2023, 15 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202111652507.1, dated Jun. 26, 2023, 14 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202210251362.2, dated Jun. 28, 2023, 15 pages. |
Ghassemi, et al., “Millimeter-Wave Integrated Pyramidal Horn Antenna Made of Multilayer Printed Circuit Board (PCB) Process”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, No. 9, Sep. 2012, pp. 4432-4435. |
Hausman, et al., “Termination Insensitive Mixers”, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electronic Systems (COMCAS 2011), Dec. 19, 2011, 13 pages. |
Aulia Dewantari et al., “Flared SIW antenna design and transceiving experiments for W-band SAR”, International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, Wiley Interscience, Hoboken, USA, vol. 28, No. 9, May 9, 2018, XP072009558. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230187804 A1 | Jun 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17392984 | Aug 2021 | US |
Child | 18164790 | US |