The present invention pertains to the fields of electronic pulse generation and antennae.
In 2001, Mayes et al. described a high voltage Marx generator sourcing a helical antenna. “The Marx Generator as an Ultra Wideband Source,” J. R. Mayes, W. J. Carey, W. C. Nunnally, and L. Altgilbers, 13th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference, 2001. While the helical antenna is traditionally a resonant device, the paper described what is now described as an impulse excitation, or shock-exciting-antenna structure, such that the structure rings with several cycles at a frequency defined by the antenna geometry. The paper described a Marx generator capable of delivering 125 kV, sourcing a helical antenna designed for a resonant frequency of 1 GHz. The paper concluded its discussion of the Marx-helical device with a measured waveform and calculated spectral response. The radiated electric field was witnessed to be less than expected. The electric field strength was measured to be only approximately 300 V/m, measured at 100 m, as shown in
Shock excitation of a resonant structure results in a brief voltage ring, producing several cycles of energy that are radiated by the structure. This is an inefficient method for producing wideband energy because the driving pulsed power produces an Ultra Wide Band spectrum of energy, as shown in
A better description of the shock-excited helical antenna, however, is one in which the physical parameters, including the stray capacitance and inductance, are pulse-excited with a voltage. The relaxation of these parameters occurs at the antenna's natural resonant frequency. Thus the radiation from the helical antenna manifests as an impulse response, and, with extremely high impulse voltages, the radiated electric field can be high.
Analysis of the initial effort showed that the primary cause of the inefficiency in the peak electric field strength was the transition section between the Marx generator and the helical antenna, as well as the initial geometry of the helical antenna. In the initial demonstration a coaxial section interconnected the Marx generator to the input of the helical antenna, as suggested by J. D. Kraus. John D. Kraus, Antennae, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill Inc., 1988. As shown in
The present invention is a significantly improved transition from a coaxial geometry to one or more helical antenna geometries, and concentric helical antennae designed to radiate simultaneous energy with multiple center frequencies.
While the helical antenna is a practical device for radiating RF energy, it is especially appealing for radiating high power RF from 100 MHz to several GHz. It is noted that the geometry described by
a) shows a sample voltage waveform from a Marx generator.
b) shows the frequency spectrum of the waveform of
a) shows a Marx generator output.
b) shows the output of a helical antenna driven by a Marx generator.
a) is a perspective drawing of a transition from coax to a helical antenna employing a solid dielectric transition to air.
b) is a cross-sectional view of the transition of
The structure and operation of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment and upon reference to the accompanying drawings. The inventors present herein the best mode for carrying out the present invention in terms of its preferred embodiment, depicted within the aforementioned drawings.
The present invention transition evolves the coaxial feed geometry to the helical antenna geometry. This section evolves from a coaxial geometry, such as a coaxial cable or the output of pulse generator having a coaxial output, to the helical geometry, which is similar to a wire above a flat ground plane, while maintaining substantially constant impedance. The fundamental preferred geometry is shown in
We note that in
A second embodiment is illustrated in
It will be apparent to those with ordinary skill in the relevant art having the benefit of this disclosure that the present invention provides an apparatus for matching the impedance between a pulse generator and one or more helical antennae. It is understood that the form of the invention shown and described in the detailed description and the drawings is to be taken merely as the presently preferred embodiment, and that the invention is limited only by the language of the claims. The drawings and detailed description presented herein are not intended to limit the invention to the particular embodiment disclosed. While the present invention has been described in terms of one preferred embodiment and a few variations thereof, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that form and detail modifications can be made to those embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.
This application claims priority from provisional application No. 60/958,211 filed Jul. 3, 2007.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60958211 | Jul 2007 | US |