BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a combination of a carrier base material, an anesthetic agent, a buffering agent, and a polysaccharide in liquid form being poured into a suppository mold cavity chamber.
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic view of an embodiment of a combination of a carrier base material, an anesthetic agent, a buffering agent, and a polysaccharide in liquid form being poured into a suppository mold cavity embodiment showing the layers formed within the mold cavity chamber.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a urethral suppository embodiment.
FIG. 4 is a side view in partial section of a distal portion of a delivery catheter disposed within a urethra of a patient and a urethral suppository being advanced distally within the delivery catheter.
FIG. 5 is a side view in partial section of the urethral suppository disposed within the urinary tract of the patient with the delivery catheter withdrawn.
FIG. 6 is a graph showing the effect of lidocaine concentration on pH with the incremental addition of sodium bicarbonate to a fluid volume of 10 ml of water.
FIG. 7 is a graph showing the effect of lidocaine concentration on pH with the incremental addition of sodium bicarbonate to a fluid volume of 5 ml of water.
FIG. 8 is a graph showing the effect of fluid volume on pH with the addition of sodium bicarbonate to a solution containing 30 mg of lidocaine.
FIG. 9 is a graph showing the effect of fluid volume on pH with the addition of sodium bicarbonate to a solution containing 45 mg of lidocaine.
FIG. 10 is a graph showing the effect of fluid volume on pH with the addition of sodium bicarbonate to a solution containing 60 mg of lidocaine.
FIG. 11 is a graph showing the results of lidocaine absorption as a result of intravesical instillation and as a result of urethral suppository administration with plasma lidocaine concentration plotted against time, with a 100 mg dose administered both intravesically and by suppository.
FIG. 12 is a graph showing the data of FIG. 11 for urethral suppository administration of lidocaine replotted on a different scale.
FIG. 13 is a graph showing the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) after urethral and suppository lidocaine administration.
FIG. 14 is a graph showing % of patients experiencing improvement in their symptoms of pain (red, n=24) or urgency (yellow, n=19) as rated by a PORIS questionnaire 30 minutes after having a suppository with 10 mg lidocaine, 5000 units heparin, with buffer and base.
FIG. 15 is a graph showing % of patients experiencing improvement in their symptoms of pain (n=4) as rated by a PORIS questionnaire 30 minutes after having a suppository with 10 mg lidocaine, 5000 units heparin with THAM (tris) buffer in place of bicarbonate and base.
FIG. 16 is a graph showing duration of pain relief of % of patients over time when contacted 24 hours after the initial treatment (n=33). The median duration of relief was 4 hours.
FIG. 17 is a cross-section of a urethral suppository according to the present invention showing multiple layers.
FIG. 18 is a schematic representation of a two-layer suppository according to the present invention showing inner space for suppository material created by insert.
FIG. 19 is a schematic representation of a three-layer suppository according to the present invention showing inner space for suppository material created by insert.
FIG. 20 is a perspective view of a suppository being dipped into a container of melted suppository material to create an outer layer of a multilayer suppository using a dipping process.
FIG. 21 is a representation of a multilayer suppository according to the present invention that employs different geometries in the layers.