Embodiments of the present invention relate to methods for transmission and for receiving a binary signal over a serial link, in particular, for the detection of the speed of transmission or baud rate, and corresponding devices.
Each transmitter/receiver in communication must initially define the speed of transmission in order to begin the communication. When the speed of transmission needs to be modified, the communication must be interrupted, protocol messages must be exchanged, and there are often numerous timing constraints to be complied with before interrupting and restarting a communication, in particular when the packets of bits being exchanged are asynchronous, in other words timed by non-synchronized transmission and reception clocks.
The current mechanisms are based on synchronization binary patterns which must firstly be transmitted between the two devices.
The device receiving this synchronization pattern can for example compare it with reference patterns previously stored in a table (“look-up table”) so as to deduce from this the real speed of transmission (baud rate).
Aside from the fact that the use of such synchronization patterns requires proprietary protocols, which represents an impediment to the interoperability between devices, this only allows the detection of the speed of transmission for the start of the communication, and furthermore from amongst a predefined set of transmission speeds, and assumes that this speed of transmission will remain constant for the entire duration of the communication.
Moreover, such a solution is completely ineffective when the speed of transmission has to be changed in the course of the communication.
Various embodiments of the invention relate to the communication of binary information over a serial link capable of taking two different states respectively associated with the two possible logical values of the binary information being communicated, notably the communication of binary information between two universal asynchronous receiver/transmitters known by those skilled in the art under the acronym UART, in particular, with a view to the auto-detection of the speed of transmission at the start of the transmission and/or to a potential modification of this speed of transmission in the course of a communication.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for the speed of transmission or the “baud rate” is generally expressed in bauds which represent the number of symbols transmitted per second (equivalent to the number of bits transmitted per second if each symbol corresponds to a single bit). This data rate allows the value of the bit time, in other words the duration of the time segment used for the transmission of the bit, to be defined.
According to one embodiment and its implementation, methods for transmission and reception are provided that allow, in the receiver, an auto-detection of the speed of transmission at the start of the communication together with an auto-detection of any potential modification of this speed of transmission in the course of the communication.
According to one embodiment and its implementation, in transmission, the idea is to use the final part of the bit time of a bit for generating a transition (or edge) over the link at the end of a portion of this bit time. This transition will be a kind of pre-warning of the imminent expiration of the bit time. Then, in reception, the detection of this transition will allow the receiver, in view of its knowledge of the value of the portion of bit time, to deduce from this the remaining period of time for receiving the current bit and, consequently, the speed of transmission.
Thus, according to one aspect, a method of transmission is provided for at least one packet of at least one bit over a serial link capable of taking two different states respectively associated with the two possible logical values of the at least one transmitted bit; the method comprises a first transmission processing comprising, starting from a transmission start time of the at least one bit and up to the expiration of a first portion of a bit time associated with the at least one bit, the placing of the link in one of its states depending on the logical value of the at least one bit and, upon the expiration of the first portion of this bit time, a generation of a first additional transition over the link so as to place the link in its other state up to the expiration of the bit time.
So as to avoid errors leading to the detection of false bits, it is preferable for the first additional transition to be sufficiently far from the middle of the bit time and from the final end of the bit time. Those skilled in the art will know how to adjust the value of the first portion of bit time as a function notably of the value of the clock signal. However, by way of example, the first portion of the bit time may be in the range between 60% and 90% of the bit time.
In general, the packet comprises several bits. In this case, according to one embodiment, the first transmission processing is implemented at least for the transmission of the first bit and the transmission of the second bit begins at the expiration of the bit time associated with the first bit.
This said, several variants are possible.
Thus, when the bit time associated with the first bit of the packet is longer than the bit time associated with the other bits of the packet and the bit time associated with the other bits of the packet may be determined, by a known relationship, from the bit time associated with the first bit of the packet, the first transmission processing may be implemented only for the transmission of the first bit.
Indeed, when this first bit, for example a bit referred to as “start bit”, is sufficiently long, a single transition may be sufficient for detecting, in reception, the speed of transmission and consequently for correctly reading the following bits of the packet.
As a variant, when the bit time associated with all the bits of the packet are identical, or different for some of them but determinable by a known relationship, it is possible of generate additional transitions for the first bit of the packet and for certain other bits of the packet, for example the second and the fourth, which may then be sufficient for detecting, in reception, the speed of transmission with sufficient precision, and consequently for correctly reading the bits of the packet.
Thus, according to one embodiment, the first transmission processing is implemented for the transmission of the first bit and the transmission of at least one other bit of the packet comprises a second transmission processing comprising starting from the transmission start time of the at least one other bit and up to the expiration of a second period counted starting from the transmission start time of the first bit and equal to the sum of all the bit times associated with the bit(s) preceding the at least one other bit and of a second portion of the bit time associated with the at least one other bit, the placing of the link in one of its states depending on the logical value of the at least one other bit, and, upon the expiration of the second period, a generation of a second additional transition over the link so as to place the link in its other state up to the expiration of the bit time associated with the at least one other bit.
As a variant, when the bit time is not identical for all the packets, in other words for example when the speed of transmission changes in the course of the communication, the first transmission processing can be implemented for the transmission of each bit of the packet and the transmission of the current bit, from the second bit up to the last, then begins at the expiration of the bit time associated with the preceding bit.
According to another aspect, a method is provided for reception of at least one packet of at least one bit, carried over a serial link capable of taking two different states respectively associated with the two possible logical values of the at least one received bit, comprising a first reception processing comprising a detection of the occurrence of a first transition between the two states of the link after the reception start time of the at least one bit and a determination of a first period separating the reception start time and the time of occurrence of the first transition, the reception end time of the at least one bit being separated from the time of occurrence of the first transition by a first additional period equal to a first predetermined portion of the first period.
In the same way as the first portion of bit time was for example in the range between 60% and 90% of the bit time in transmission, during the reception, the first predetermined portion can be in the range between 10% and 70% of the first period (which corresponds to a percentage of the bit time in the range between 10% and 40%).
According to one embodiment in which the received packet comprises several bits, the first reception processing is implemented at least for the reception of the first bit, and the reception of the second bit begins at the expiration of the first additional period associated with the first bit.
According to one embodiment in which, when the bit time associated with the first bit of the received packet is longer than the bit time associated with the other bits of the received packet and the bit time associated with the other bits of the received packet may be determined, by a known relationship, from the bit time associated with the first bit of the received packet, the first reception processing may be implemented only for the reception of the first bit.
According to one embodiment in which all the bits of the received packet have the same bit time or have different bit times for some of them but determinable by a known relationship, the first reception processing is implemented for the reception of the first bit and the reception of at least one other bit of the packet comprises a second reception processing comprising a detection of the occurrence of a second transition between the two states of the link after the reception start time of the at least one other bit and a determination of a second period separating the reception start time of the first bit and the time of occurrence of the second transition. The reception end time of the at least one other bit is separated from the time of occurrence of the second transition by a second additional period equal to a second predetermined portion of the second period.
The first portion and the second portion may be identical.
According to one embodiment notably allowing a detection of a change of speed of transmission, potentially at each bit, the first reception processing is implemented for the reception of each bit of the received packet and the reception of the current bit, from the second bit up to the last, begins at the expiration of the additional period associated with the preceding bit.
According to another aspect, a processing unit is provided that is configured for transmitting at least one packet of at least one bit over a serial link capable of taking two different states respectively associated with the two possible logical values of the at least one transmitted bit.
According to one general feature of this other aspect, the processing unit comprises transmission processing unit configured for implementing the transmission method such as defined hereinbefore.
According to another aspect, a processing unit is provided that is configured for receiving at least one packet of at least one bit carried over a serial link capable of taking two different states respectively associated with the two possible logical values of the at least one received bit.
According to one general feature of this other aspect, the processing unit comprises reception processing unit configured for implementing the reception method such as defined hereinbefore.
The processing unit may comprise both a transmission processing unit and a reception processing unit.
Such a processing unit may, for example, be a universal asynchronous receiver/transmitter (UART).
Other advantages and features of the invention will become apparent upon examining the detailed description of non-limiting embodiments and their implementations, and the appended drawings in which:
In
Each serial link 30, 31 is capable of taking two different states respectively associated with the two possible logical values of the transmitted bits. These two logical states result for example from the difference in potential between the data wire and the ground wire.
The processing unit 1 comprises transmission processing unit 10 and reception processing unit 11. These two units are timed by a clock signal CK1 coming from a generator 12. Similarly, the processing unit 2 comprises transmission processing unit 20 and reception processing unit 21 timed by a clock signal CK2 coming from a generator 22.
The transmission processing units (transmitters) 10, 20 are configured for implementing the transmission method, implementation examples of which will be described with reference to
Similarly, the reception processing units (receivers) 11, 21 are configured for implementing the reception method of one of the implementation examples which will be described with reference to
For this purpose, the transmission processing units and the transmission and reception processing units comprise elements with a conventional structure, such as for example shift registers and/or any other circuits capable of generating edges over the transmission link depending on the logical values of the bits to be transmitted, and/or any other circuits capable of analyzing the characteristics of the received frame, for example a microcontroller.
The processing units may for example be universal asynchronous receivers/transmitters (UART).
Reference is now more particularly made to
It is assumed here that the logical value of the bit b is equal to 0 and that the transmission start time to of the bit b corresponds to a falling edge TR0 starting from the steady state S1 (here high state) of the link.
The bit b has a bit time TB.
A first portion PTB1 of the bit time TB equal to αTB is then defined.
The transmission processing unit 10 of the processing unit i then places the serial link in one of its states depending on the logical value of the bit b for the whole of the first portion of bit time PTB1. In the example described here, since the logical value of the bit b is 0, the link is placed in its state S0.
Then, upon the expiration of the portion PTB1, a first additional transition TRA1 is generated over the link so as to place it in its other state, in the present case the state S1, and this lasts up to the expiration of the bit time TB in other words during the portion PRB1 equal to (1−α)TB.
One embodiment of the reception processing of such a transmitted bit is illustrated in
The reception processing unit 21 of the processing unit 2 knows the value of α.
The reception processing first of all comprises a detection of the time tt0 of the start of reception of the bit b, here typically corresponding to the occurrence of a falling edge TR0 from the steady state S1 of the link.
Then, the occurrence of a first transition TR1 between the two states of the link is detected, here between the state S0 and the state S1, after the time tt0.
This first transition takes place at the time tt1.
The reception processing unit of the processing unit then determines the first period D1 between the times tt0 and tt1.
The reception processing unit is from then on able to determine that the bit time TB of the received bit will be equal to D1/α and that the time tt2 of the end of reception of the bit b will be separated from the time tt1 of occurrence of the first transition TR1 by a first additional period DA1 equal to a first predetermined portion β of the first period D1, in this case defined by the formula (I) hereinbelow:
It can therefore be seen that the use of an additional transition in the transmission phase situated towards the end of the bit time in reception allows the end of the reception of the bit to be anticipated and the bit time to be determined.
So as to reduce the risk of error in the detection of the bit time, it is preferable for the first additional transition TRA1 and, as a consequence the first transition TR1, to be situated sufficiently far from half way through the bit time and the end of the bit time. Those skilled in the art will be able to choose a taking into account these criteria notably as a function of the value of the clock signals used.
This said, by way of example, α may be chosen within the range between 0.6 and 0.9, for example equal to 0.75.
For this reason, β is in the range between 0.11 and 0.66, for example equal to 0.33.
In the examples in
Reference is now more particularly made to
In the example described here, the packet is a frame of the type UART comprising a first bit referenced “start”, which is a start bit followed by eight useful bits of data b0-b7 followed by a final bit referenced “stop”.
The transmission processing illustrated in
In fact, although it is theoretically possible for the bit time TB of the first bit start to be equal to the bit time TB0 of all the other bits of the packet PQ, it is preferable, so as to minimize the risk of error in the detection of the bit time in reception, for the bit time TB of the first bit start to be longer than the bit time TB0.
In practice, a bit time TB could be chosen to be equal to K times TB0, where K may be an integer or otherwise. K may, in particular, be a multiple N of the bit time TB0, where N may for example be chosen to be equal to 4.
The first additional transition TRA1 is, as indicated hereinbefore, generated upon the expiration of the portion PTB1 equal to αTB.
In reception, the time periods D1 and DA1 are determined as indicated hereinbefore with reference to
Once the bit time TB has been determined, the bit time TB0 can be readily calculated by dividing the bit time TB by N.
Thus, the speed of transmission (“baud rate”) is determined.
Nevertheless, the bits b0 at stop could have various bit times but determinable from the bit time TB by a known relationship of the receiver. Thus, each bit time TBi for the bits b0 at stop could be the product of TB with a coefficient Ci, Ci, being the coefficient associated with the bit of rank i and also known by the receiver. α remains identical for all the bits.
In the example illustrated in
In this example, it is assumed that all the bits of the packet PQ have the same bit time as TB.
In this embodiment, so as to reduce the risk of error in the detection of the bit time in reception, and consequently in the detection of the speed of transmission (baud rate), the transmission processing unit will generate an additional transition, not only during the bit time of the first bit start, but also during certain other bits of the packet, in this case the bits b0 and b2.
More precisely, the first transmission processing, such as illustrated in
As illustrated in the upper part in
Accordingly, the link is placed in this state S0 during a second portion PTB2 of the bit time TB.
Although not indispensable, the duration of the portion PTB2 is preferably equal to the duration of the portion PTB1, for the sake of simplification.
PTB2 is consequently equal to αTB.
The second period D20 is consequently equal to the sum of the bit time TB associated with the start bit and of the second portion PTB2. D20 is therefore equal to (1+α)TB.
Upon the expiration of the second period D20, the transmission processing unit generates a second additional transition TRA2 so as to place the link in its state S1 up to the expiration of the bit time TB associated with the bit b0.
The link is therefore placed in its state S1 during the portion of bit time PRB2 here equal to (1−α)TB.
In view of the generation of the two additional transitions TRA1 and TRA2, the bit time TB will be able to be calculated with sufficient precision so as to be able to forego the generation of another additional transition within the bit b1.
On the other hand, it is preferable to re-generate a third additional transition TRA3 during the bit b2.
This third additional transition TRA3 is generated upon the expiration of a third period D30 again counted starting from the time of the start of the first bit start, this duration D30 being equal to the sum of bit times of preceding bits, in this case here three bit times TB, and of the portion PTB3 which is equal to αTB. D30 is therefore here equal to (3+α)TB.
In reception, as illustrated in the lower part in
Then, the reception processing unit applies a second reception processing for the bit b0.
This second reception processing comprises a detection of the occurrence of a second transition TR2 over the link, here making it go from its state S0 to the state S1, after the reception time of the bit b0.
The reception processing unit then determines a second period D2 separating the reception time of the first bit start and the time of occurrence of this second transition TR2.
The reception processing unit can then carries out a new determination of the bit time TB which is equal to:
This second determination of the bit time is more accurate than the first which becomes obsolete.
Furthermore, the reception end time of the second bit b0 will be separated from the time of occurrence of the second transition TR2 by a second additional period DA2 which is equal to a second predetermined portion of the second period D2.
More precisely, the second additional period DA2 is equal to:
The second reception processing is also applied for the fourth bit b2 of the packet PQ.
More precisely, the detection of the third transition TR3 allows the third period D3 to be determined still counted starting from the reception start time of the first bit start.
This allows a new estimation of the bit time TB to be obtained which is supplied by the formula (IV) hereinbelow:
This third determination of the bit time is more accurate than the second which, in turn, becomes obsolete.
The reception end time of the bit b2 will then be obtained at the end of the expiration of the third additional period DA3 which is obtained using the formula (V) hereinbelow:
Whereas in the embodiment in
More precisely, it may for example be assumed that the bit time of each bit of the packet is equal to GiTBB, where TBB is a constant and Gi a coefficient associated with the bit of rank i in the packet PQ. The coefficients Gi are known by the transmitter and by the receiver, and α remains identical for all the bits but could be different for each bit as long as it is known to the transmitter and receiver.
Thus, taking once again the example in
This bit time TB1 is furthermore equal to GiTBB (where G1 is the coefficient associated with the first bit start) which supplies a first determination for TBB equal to D1/(αG1).
A new estimation of TBB can be obtained in reception with the transition TR2 (second bit b0) and the formula TBB=D2/(G2(1+α)).
The bit time TB3 of the third bit b1 can then be determined by the reception processing unit via the formula TB3=G3TBB.
A new estimation of TBB can be obtained in reception with the transition TR3 (fourth bit) and the formula TBB=D3/(G4(3+α)).
This latter estimation of TBB will be retained for the determination by the reception processing unit of the bit times of the bits b3 at stop using the formula GiTBB.
The embodiment illustrated in
For this
Accordingly, the application is advantageously provided at the transmission, for each bit to be transmitted, the transmission processing such as that described with reference to
In practice, the transmission processing unit will generate an additional transition TRA1 during each transmission of a bit, at the end of the portion PTB1. In the example described, for the purposes of simplification, PTB1 is identical for all the bits since it was assumed that the bit time was equal for all the bits. However, PTB1 could be different for at least some of the bits owing to the difference in the associated bit times. α can remain identical for all the bits but could be different for each bit as long as it is known to the transmitter and receiver.
In reception, the reception processing unit will determine, for each bit, the period D1, the additional period DA1, and will accordingly be able to determine the bit time associated with the bit in question.
The invention is not limited to the embodiments and their implementations which have just been described but encompasses all the variants of the latter.
Thus, although in everything that has been described the transmission or reception start time of the first bit of a packet was determined by the occurrence of a transition of the link starting from its steady state, it is perfectly possible for this transmission or reception start time to be supplied by a signal external to the link.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14 61892 | Dec 2014 | FR | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/853,520, filed Sep. 14, 2015, which claims priority to French Application No. 1461892, filed on Dec. 4, 2014, which applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4133978 | Hewlett, Jr. | Jan 1979 | A |
4797591 | Duxbury et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4797951 | Duxbury | Jan 1989 | A |
4841549 | Knapp | Jun 1989 | A |
4888791 | Barndt, Sr. | Dec 1989 | A |
5185765 | Walker | Feb 1993 | A |
5315299 | Matsumoto | May 1994 | A |
5459751 | Okamoto | Oct 1995 | A |
5473633 | Fischer | Dec 1995 | A |
5499247 | Matsuda | Mar 1996 | A |
5504757 | Cook | Apr 1996 | A |
5588023 | Ho | Dec 1996 | A |
5623522 | Ito | Apr 1997 | A |
5654983 | Sauser, Jr. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657347 | Mori | Aug 1997 | A |
5661736 | Sferrazza | Aug 1997 | A |
5696790 | Graham | Dec 1997 | A |
5740199 | Sibigtroth | Apr 1998 | A |
5774452 | Wolosewicz | Jun 1998 | A |
5787132 | Kishigami | Jul 1998 | A |
5790607 | Burke | Aug 1998 | A |
5878079 | Mori | Mar 1999 | A |
5903607 | Tailliet | May 1999 | A |
5963194 | Umeda | Oct 1999 | A |
6018513 | Okamoto | Jan 2000 | A |
6028849 | Niot | Feb 2000 | A |
6064697 | Yoshikawa | May 2000 | A |
6084797 | Maloberti | Jul 2000 | A |
6163586 | Hongbin Hao | Dec 2000 | A |
6181741 | Nakanishi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6321982 | Gaultier | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336181 | Fuzisawa | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351489 | Tetzlaff | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366125 | Rochard | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385210 | Overberg | May 2002 | B1 |
6393502 | Meyer | May 2002 | B1 |
6493260 | Micheloni | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6560279 | Renz | May 2003 | B1 |
6775324 | Mohan | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6864712 | Agarwal | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873642 | Fey | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6944248 | Sullivan | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7058149 | Pigott | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7272059 | Vimercati | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7333536 | Sinha | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336706 | Krafft | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7353442 | Bahl | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363129 | Barnicle | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7415079 | Cameron | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418031 | Jha | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7426123 | Leung | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7729427 | Kwok | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7787576 | Foerster | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7864078 | Rohatschek | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8044743 | Greiss | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8201411 | Feher | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8275080 | Jordan | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8284830 | Lee | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8350497 | Peting | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8401394 | Walewski | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8564365 | Dang | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8581619 | Singh | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8633779 | Pfaffinger | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8675742 | Zhang | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8766955 | Loveridge | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8767777 | Kobayashi | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8788867 | Webb, III | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8850259 | Webb, III | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8917804 | Sano | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9106219 | Singh | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9129139 | Varone | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9181741 | Bettinzoli | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9306605 | Van Der Tuijn | Apr 2016 | B1 |
10122552 | Arnal | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10181873 | Allen | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20010055311 | Trachewsky | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020054504 | Micheloni | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071484 | Spichale | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020084841 | Taguchi | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101884 | Pohlmeyer | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020146068 | Sumitomo | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172315 | Sullivan | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181578 | Takano | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040122490 | Reinke | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040213169 | Allard | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040240590 | Cameron | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050078745 | Sinha | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050246602 | Bahl | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286627 | Tabatabaei | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286643 | Ozawa | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060023781 | Leung | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060245515 | Tachi | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070040657 | Fosler | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070245217 | Valle | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070291887 | Ishimoto | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080049606 | Rhelimi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080095290 | Leung | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080123730 | Robinson | May 2008 | A1 |
20090045773 | Scherr | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046773 | Scherr | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090141789 | Warren | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090185615 | Someya | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090224719 | Shimada | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110103275 | Rhelinni | May 2011 | A1 |
20110150065 | Tailliet | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166856 | Lindahl | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120051241 | Mori | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120275454 | Chen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314738 | Kashima | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130169173 | Chen | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130336339 | Valiani | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140036988 | Kashima | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140070843 | Singh | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140140390 | Kashima | May 2014 | A1 |
20140169419 | Kashima | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169443 | Karino | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140241414 | Reidl | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140274203 | Ganong, III | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140358552 | Xu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150008967 | Zhu | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150131497 | Arnal | May 2015 | A1 |
20150187209 | Brandt | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150236844 | Pan | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160036684 | Jones | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050089 | Strasser | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160094312 | Fredriksson | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160126968 | Lesso | May 2016 | A1 |
20160164701 | Arnal | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160306409 | Mori | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170139872 | Ladd | May 2017 | A1 |
20170141604 | Park | May 2017 | A1 |
20190044758 | Arnal | Feb 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“Manchester Coding Basics,” Atmel Corporation, Application Note, Sep. 2009, 24 pages. |
Kartalopoulos, S.V., “Digital Transmission and Coding Techniques,” Introduction to DWDM Technology—Data in Rainbow, Chapter 12, Dec. 1999, pp. 167-172. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190044758 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14853520 | Sep 2015 | US |
Child | 16157428 | US |