This application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application of PCT PCT/CA2014/000745, entitled TRANSMISSION APPARATUS FOR A WIRELESS DEVICE USING DELTA-SIGMA MODULATION, filed on Oct. 16, 2014, which claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/493,262, filed Sep. 22, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to the field of radio frequency identification systems, and more specifically, to transmission apparatus for wireless devices (e.g., tags) in backscattered and inductively coupled radio frequency identification systems.
Radio frequency identification (“RFID”) systems have become very popular in a great number of applications. A typical RFID system 100 is shown in
The tags 130 in RFID system 100 may be classified into passive and active types according to the power provisions of the tags. Passive tags do not have their own power supply and therefore draw all power required from the reader 120 by electromagnetic energy received via the tag's antenna 133. In contrast, active tags incorporate a battery which supplies all or part of the power required for their operation.
A typical transmission method of energy 140 and data 150 between a reader 120 and a tag 130 in a RFID system 100 is by way of backscatter coupling (or backscattering). The antenna 123 of the reader 120 couples energy 140 to the tag 130. By modulating the reflection coefficient of the tag's antenna 133, data 150 may be transmitted between the tag 130 and the reader 120. Backscattering, as shown in
Amplitude shift keying (“ASK”) modulation is typically used in RFID systems 100. In ASK modulation, the amplitude of the carrier is switched between two states controlled by the binary transmitting code sequence. Also, in some applications, phase shift keying (“PSK”) modulation is also used. However, arbitrary complex type modulations are generally not used in current RFID backscattering systems. Here complex type modulations are ones that are normally expressed as I+jQ, where I is the in-phase component, Q is the quadrature component, and j is the square root of −1.
For reference, the beginnings of RFID use may be found as far back as World War II. See for example, Stockman H., “Communication By Means of Reflected Power,” Proc. IRE, pp. 1196-1204, October 1948. Passive and semi-passive RFID tags were used to communicate with the reader by radio frequency (“RF”) backscattering. In backscattering RFID systems, a number of tags 130 interact with a main reader device 120 as shown in
Typically, a link budget exists between the reader 120 and the tag 130. The tag 130 communicates with the reader 120 by backscattering the RF signal back to the reader 120 using either ASK or PSK modulation. One advantage of the backscattering method is that it does not need to generate an RF carrier on chip within the tag 130, thus it requires less power, less complexity, and less cost. A typical block diagram of a backscattering transmission apparatus 400 for a tag 130 is shown in
With the switch 410 on (i.e., closed), Γ=1. When the switch is off (i.e., open), Γ=0. By turning the switch 410 on and off, an ASK signal 420 is generated as shown in
PSK signals may also be generated using a similar set up. This is shown in the transmission apparatus 500 illustrated in
Here, Zi is an impedance that is switched in as per
As shown in
In Thomas S., Reynolds S. Matthew, “QAM Backscatter for Passive UHF RFID Tags”, IEEE RFID, p. 210, 2010 (Thomas et al.), the generation of four quadrature amplitude modulation (“QAM”) signals was proposed in which a number of Γ values are switched in and out.
There are several problems with prior tag transmission apparatus. For example, systems such as that proposed by Thomas et al. are limited in the nature of signals that they can backscatter. That is, any arbitrary signal cannot be transmitted. For example, if the QAM signal is first filtered via a filter, Thomas et al.'s system cannot transmit a filtered version of the QAM signal. As another example, if the signal is simply a sine wave or a Gaussian minimum shift keying (“GMSK”) signal, Thomas et al.'s system cannot be used to transmit this signal. As a further example, Thomas et. al.'s system cannot transmit single side band signals.
A need therefore exists for an improved transmission apparatus for wireless devices (e.g., tags) in backscattered and inductively coupled radio frequency identification systems. Accordingly, a solution that addresses, at least in part, the above and other shortcomings is desired.
According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a transmission apparatus for a wireless device, comprising: an antenna for receiving an original signal and for backscattering a modulated signal containing information from the wireless device; a variable impedance coupled to the antenna, the variable impedance having an impedance value; a delta-sigma modulator coupled to the variable impedance for modulating the impedance value, and thereby a backscattering coefficient for the antenna, in accordance with the information to generate the modulated signal; and, a decoder coupled to the delta-sigma modulator for generating the impedance value from the information.
Features and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:
It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.
In the following description, details are set forth to provide an understanding of the invention. In some instances, certain software, circuits, structures and methods have not been described or shown in detail in order not to obscure the invention. The term “apparatus” is used herein to refer to any machine for processing data, including the systems, devices, and network arrangements described herein. The term “wireless device” is used herein to refer to RFID tags, RFID transponders, cellular telephones, smart phones, portable computers, notebook computers, or similar devices. The present invention may be implemented in any computer programming language provided that the operating system of the data processing system provides the facilities that may support the requirements of the present invention. Any limitations presented would be a result of a particular type of operating system or computer programming language and would not be a limitation of the present invention. The present invention may also be implemented in hardware or in a combination of hardware and software.
Γi=αejϕ
where ϕi is the phase, α is the magnitude of the reflection coefficient, and j is the square root of −1. The back scattering impedance (i.e., the impedance seen by the antenna 133) is then given by:
where Zs is a constant (typically 50 ohms) and Zi is the back scattering impedance value.
Assuming the phase is zero:
If s(t) is a signal (e.g., a sine wave) that is to be sent to the reader 120, it must be directly related to α(t) (e.g., s(t) is directly proportional to α(t)) and thus Γ. This produces an impedance value Zi that varies with time.
In this embodiment, the signal s(t) would be backscattered back to the reader 120 by the wireless device 130. In the transmission apparatus 800 shown in
Referring again to
As shown in
The delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 may be of variable design. For example, according to one embodiment, the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 may include or be a low-pass delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator. According to another embodiment, the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 may include or be a band-pass delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator. According to one embodiment, the the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 may be a single bit delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator.
The delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 generates an output bit stream that represents the input data 821 from a DC level to some predetermined design bandwidth. Beyond the predetermined design bandwidth, quantized noise of the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 may increase until, at some design cutoff point, the signal may be deemed to have too much quantization noise. According to one embodiment, one or more filters may be included in the variable impedance 810 circuit to filter out-of-band noise output from the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840. The variable impedance 810 circuit has an output electrically connected to the antenna 133. The delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 is coupled to an input to the variable impedance 810 circuit to digitally control the output of the variable impedance 810 circuit such that the reflection coefficient Γ of the antenna 133 may be adjusted by changing the impedance value Zi of the variable impedance 810 circuit. According to one embodiment, the output of the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 switches the impedance value Zi of the variable impedance 810 between at least two states or impedance values Zi.
According to one embodiment, the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 may be of any order based on the bandwidth of the signals being applied to it. In addition, the clock applied to the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 may set the over-sampling rate.
Summarizing the above, and referring again to
Referring again to
According to one embodiment, communication between the reader 120 and the wireless device 130 may occur by sensing inductive loading changes in the reader 120. Here, the reader 120 communicates with the wireless device 120 via magnetic or inductive coupling. This is shown in
The law of Biot and Savart is given by:
This allows the calculation of the magnetic field at every point as a function of the current, i1, as well as the geometry. Here, μo is the permeability, x is the distance, and S describes the integration-path along the coil. Furthermore, the mutual inductance and the coupling factor are given by:
In these equations, A2 describes the area of the second coil and L1 and L2 are the inductances of the two coils 1320, 1330. The distance x between the reader-coil 1320 and transponder-coil 1330 also determines the coupling factor. The equivalent model for this coupling is shown in
General speaking, the signal received back by the reader 120 is a function of the impedance value changing in the wireless device 130. Once this impedance value changes, the signal seen by the reader 120 is modified and the reader 120 can detect this.
As in the case of backscattering, as shown in
Summarizing the above, and referring again to
The output of the decoder 1420 and delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 1440 may switch the array of impedances 1410 between various states which modifies the incoming RF signal. The signal 1430 applied to the digital block 1420 may take the form of any complex modulation signal, for example, GMSK, nPSK, 8 PSK, nQAM, OFDM, etc., and such signals may be offset from the incoming radio frequency signal by a frequency+/−ω.
The input 1430 to the digital block 1420 may alternate between the in-phase (i.e., I) and quadrature (i.e., Q) signals via a control signal, for example. Also, the array of impedances 1410 may modify the incoming RF signal from 0 to 90 degrees offset depending on whether the data is I or Q data. For example, if the I signal would produce an impedance value at theta degrees then the Q signal would produce an impedance value that is theta+90 degrees. The control signal may be a clock signal. The signals (e.g., 1070) applied to the I and Q signals may take the form of a DC signal or of sine and cosine waves at a selected frequency. The I and Q signals applied to the digital block 1420 may be adjusted to compensate for any errors in the impedance array 1410 due to variations in the impedance value in the array. The array of impedances 1410 may have some filtering characteristics to filter off some of the DAC quantized out-of-band noise. And, the reader 120 used to detect the modulated signal may compensate for any errors generated within the impedance array 1410, the digital block 1420, or the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 1440.
Thus, according to one embodiment, there is provided a transmission apparatus 800 for a wireless device 130, comprising: an antenna 133 for receiving an original signal and for backscattering a modulated signal containing information 830 from the wireless device 120; a variable impedance 810 coupled to the antenna 133, the variable impedance 810 having an impedance value Zi; a delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 coupled to the variable impedance 810 for modulating the impedance value Zi, and thereby a backscattering coefficient Γ for the antenna 133, in accordance with the information 830 to generate the modulated signal (e.g., an arbitrary modulated signal); and, a decoder 820 coupled to the delta-sigma modulator 840 for generating the impedance value Zi from the information 830.
In the above transmission apparatus 800, the variable impedance 810 may be coupled in series with the antenna 133. The wireless device 130 may be powered by energy 140 from the original signal. The variable impedance 810 may include an array of impedances and respective switches. The decoder 820 may include a backscattering coefficient Γ to impedance value Zi decoder. The information 830 may be an N-bit digital waveform 830. The N-bit digital waveform 830 may be applied to the decoder 820 and then to a delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 to produce a control signal 821 for the variable impedance 810 that is related to the N-bit digital waveform 830. A change in the impedance value Zi may backscatter the original signal to produce the modulated signal, the modulated signal being a frequency offset (e.g., up-converted) form of the N-bit digital waveform 830. The control signal 821 for the variable impedance 810 may switch an array of impedances within the variable impedance 810 which may change characteristics of the backscattering coefficient Γ of the antenna 133. The information 830 may be a complex modulation signal 1030. The complex modulation signal 1030 may be offset in frequency from the original signal. The complex modulation signal 1030 may be one of a GMSK signal, a nPSK signal, a 8 PSK signal, a nQAM signal, and an OFDM signal. The complex modulation signal 1030 may be represented by I+jQ, where I is an inphase component, Q is a quadrature component, and j is a square root of −1. The complex modulation signal 1030 may alternate between an in-phase signal (I) and a quadrature signal (Q) via a control signal. The variable impedance 810, 1010 may switch between backscattering coefficients that are 90 degrees offset from each other depending on whether the complex modulation signal 1030 is the in-phase signal (I) or the quadrature signal (Q). The control signal may be a clock signal. The transmission apparatus 800, 1000 may further include a digital signal generator 1040. The digital signal generator 1040 may apply a constant value signal to the in-phase signal (I) and the quadrature signal (Q). The digital signal generator 1040 may apply sine and cosine wave signals 1070 to the in-phase signal (I) and the quadrature signal (Q), respectively. The complex modulation signal 1030 may be a sum of an in-phase signal (I) and a quadrature signal (Q). The transmission apparatus 800, 1000 may further include a digital signal generator 1040. The digital signal generator 1040 may apply a constant value signal to the in-phase signal (I) and the quadrature signal (Q). The digital signal generator 1040 may apply sine and cosine wave signals 1070 to the in-phase signal (I) and the quadrature signal (Q), respectively. The N-bit digital waveform 830 may be adjusted to compensate for errors in at least one of the decoder 820, the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840, and the variable impedance 810. The variable impedance 810 may include a filter for filtering noise generated by at least one of the decoder 820 and the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840. The modulated signal may be an arbitrary signal. The wireless device 120 may be a RFID tag. The original signal may be received from a RFID reader 120. The RFID reader 120 may be configured to correct for errors in at least one of the decoder 820, the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840, and the variable impedance 810. The transmission apparatus 800 may further include a processor for controlling the transmission apparatus 800 and memory for storing the information 830. The delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 may be one of a low-pass delta-sigma modulator and a band-pass delta-sigma modulator. The delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 may be a single bit delta-sigma modulator. And, the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 may switch (S1, S2) the impedance value Zi between at least two states (Z1, Z2).
The above embodiments may contribute to an improved method and apparatus for communications between wireless device 130 and reader 120 in backscattered and inductively coupled radio frequency identification systems and may provide one or more advantages. For example, the wireless devices 130 of the present invention are not limited in the nature of signals that they may backscatter or inductively couple to the reader 120. In addition, the wireless devices 130 of the present invention allow for filtering of these signals. In addition, the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 reduces the number of impedances that need to switch states in order to produce a signal. Furthermore, the delta-sigma (ΔΣ) modulator 840 enables high levels of modulation with as few as only one impedance.
The embodiments of the invention described above are intended to be exemplary only. Those skilled in this art will understand that various modifications of detail may be made to these embodiments, all of which come within the scope of the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2014/000745 | 10/16/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/044912 | 3/31/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4380064 | Ishikawa | Apr 1983 | A |
4701871 | Sasaki | Oct 1987 | A |
5523726 | Kroeger | Jun 1996 | A |
5534827 | Yamaji | Jul 1996 | A |
6054925 | Proctor | Apr 2000 | A |
6339621 | Cojocaru | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6725014 | Voegele | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6920315 | Wilcox | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6956814 | Campanella | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7167715 | Stanforth | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7348875 | Hughes | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7574732 | Knox | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7742773 | Twitchell | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7821279 | Kato | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8004454 | Lindoff | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8150421 | Ward | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8334801 | Fretenburg | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8384519 | Kuhl | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8548087 | Trachewsky | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559554 | Vossiek | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8590790 | Manku | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8847834 | Manku | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020008615 | Heide | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020008656 | Landt | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020063622 | Armstrong | May 2002 | A1 |
20040033808 | Rorabaugh | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040069852 | Seppinen | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040142655 | Voegele | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050012653 | Heide | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050083179 | Carrender | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099333 | Gila | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117663 | Drogi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050253688 | Fukuda | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060145817 | Aikawa | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152369 | Reunamaki | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060220794 | Zhu | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236203 | Diorio | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070024444 | Fukuda | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070103303 | Shoarinejad | May 2007 | A1 |
20070246546 | Yoshida | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070290747 | Traylor | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080081571 | Rofougaran | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080176583 | Brachet | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080225932 | Fukuda | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080246667 | Symons | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080309550 | Sairo | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090160711 | Mehta | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090195360 | Jeon | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090303005 | Tuttle | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309780 | Albert | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100052869 | Stewart | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100141398 | Borovoy | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100237996 | Turner | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100302005 | Popovski | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110006942 | Kluge | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110089955 | Kato | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110109440 | Muehlmann | May 2011 | A1 |
20110169523 | Atrash | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110234445 | Patrick | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110304497 | Molyneux | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120052884 | Bogatin | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120112959 | Richard | May 2012 | A1 |
20120146771 | Shimura | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120224657 | Sasaki | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130178231 | Morgan | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130187761 | Shoarinejad | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130201003 | Sabesan | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130281120 | Oka | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130299579 | Manku | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300619 | Manku | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140016719 | Manku | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140128707 | Bakker | May 2014 | A1 |
20140184447 | Zhou | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140211691 | Emadzadeh | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150009018 | Manku | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150128707 | Viikari | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1224282 | Jul 1999 | CN |
1820534 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1836379 | Sep 2006 | CN |
1890675 | Jan 2007 | CN |
1909361 | Feb 2007 | CN |
101088229 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101137912 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101887528 | Nov 2010 | CN |
202134018 | Feb 2012 | CN |
0087107 | Aug 1983 | EP |
0851599 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0899682 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1646155 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1942447 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1505531 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2073036 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2124348 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2124348 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2330538 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2330538 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2000019246 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2001021644 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001339327 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002078247 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2004506907 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005017112 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2006510910 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2007205177 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008048288 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008124915 | May 2008 | JP |
2008514920 | May 2008 | JP |
2008206327 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2009130389 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2009539282 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010224262 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2012060568 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2012123731 | Jun 2012 | JP |
2276464 | Feb 2004 | RU |
0214897 | Feb 2002 | WO |
03034632 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03077489 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2006095791 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007016626 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2010129589 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2013170338 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013177658 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014008576 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
V. Chawla and D. Sam Ha, “An overview of passive RFID”, VA Polytechnic Institute and State University, IEEE Applications and Practice, Sep. 2007. 0163-6807/07, pp. 11-17. |
Gay, et al., for “An Ultra-Low-Power Sensor Interface Built Around a Reconfigurable Incremental Sigma-Delta Modulator for Sensor Networks Employing Electromagnetic Backscatter”, IEEE Circuits and Systems, 2008. |
Stewart J. Thomas et al., “Quadrature Amplitude Modulated Backscatter in Passive and Semi-passive UHF RFID Systems,” IEEE Trasns. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 1175-1182 (Apr. 2012). |
Johan Sommarek et al., “Digital Modulator with Bandpass Delta-Sigma Modulator,” Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, BO, vol. 43, No. 1 (Apr. 1, 2005). |
Wei Lin et al: “Mismatching design method for RFID tag antenna”, Antennas Propagation and EM Theory (ISAPE), 2010 9th International Symposium ON, IEEE, (Nov. 29, 2010). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 6, 2013, for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2012/000567. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2012/000567 dated Nov. 18, 2014. |
Samiur Rehman et al: “Switched mode transmitter architecture using low pass delta sigma modulator”, Emerging Technologies (ICET), 2011 7th International Conference ON, IEEE, Sep. 5, 2011 (Sep. 5, 2011), pp. 1-6, XP032062204, ISBN: 978-1-4577-0769-8. |
Shinichi Hori et al., “A 0.7-3GHz Envelope Delta-Sigma Modulator Using Phase Modulated Carrier Clock for Multi-mode/band Switching Amplifier,” IEEE Radio Freq. Integrated. Circuits Symposium (Jun. 5, 2011). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 13, 2013, for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2012/000570. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2012/000570 dated Nov. 18, 2014. |
N. Gay, et. al., “An Ultra-Low-Power Sensor Interface Built Around a Reconfigurable Incremental Sigma-Delta Modulator for Sensor Networks Employing Electromagnetic Backscatter”, Circuits and Systems, 2008. APCCAS 2008. IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on, vol. , No. , pp. 280-283, Nov. 30, 2008-Dec. 3, 2008, DOI:10.1109/APCCAS.2008.4746014. |
Johan Som Marek et al: “Digital Modulator with Bandpass Delta-Sigma Modulator”, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, BO, vol. 43, No. 1, Apr. 1, 2005, pp. 81-86, ISSN: 1573-1979, DOI: 10.1007/S10470-005-6573-Z. |
Stewart J. Thomas et al., “Quadrature Amplitude Modulated Backscatter in Passive and Semi-passive UHF RFID Systems,” IEEE Trasns. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 1175-1182 (Apr. 3, 2012). |
Shinichi Hori et al., “A 0.7-3GHz Envelope Delta Sigma Modulator Using Phase Modulated Carrier Clock for Multi-mode/band Switching Amplifier,” IEEE Radio Freq. Integrated. Circuits Symposium (Jun. 5, 2011). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/CA2012/000568 dated Feb. 18, 2013. |
Ur Rehman, et. al; “Switched Mode Transmitter Architecture Using Low Pass Delta Sigma Modulator”, Emerging Technologies (ICET), 2001, 7th International Conference on, pp. 1-6, Sep. 5-6, 2011. |
Helaoui, et al, “A Novel Architecture of Delta-Sigma Modulator Enabling All-Digital Multiband Multistandard RF Transmitters Design”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems vol. 55, No. 11, pp. 1129-1133, Nov. 2008. |
Sommarek, et al., “A Digital Modulator with Bandpass Delta-Sigma Modulator”, Sold-State Circuits Conference, 2004, ESSCIRC 2004, Proceedings of the 30th European, pp. 159-162, Sep. 21-23, 2004. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2012/000568 dated Dec. 2, 2014. |
Johan Sommarek et al: “Digital Modulator with Bandpass Delta-Sigma Modulator”, Analog Intergrated Circuits and Signal Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, BO, vol. 43, No. 1, Apr. 1, 2005, pp. 81-86, ISSN: 1573-1979, DOI: 10.1007/s10470-005-6573-Z. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated February 18, 2013, for Corresponding PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2012/000569. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2012/000569 dated Dec. 2, 2014. |
Stewart J. Thomas, et al., A 96 Mbit/sec, 15.5 pJ/bit 16-QAM modulator for UHF backscatter communication, 2012 IEEE International Conference on RFID (RFID), U.S., IEEE, Apr. 3, 2012, pp. 185-190. |
Stockman H., “Communication by means of reflected power,” Proc. IRE, pp. 1196-1204, Oct. 1948. |
Thomas S., Reynolds S. Matthew, QAM Backscatter for passive UHF RFID tags, IEEE RFID, p. 210, 2010. |
International Searching Authority (ISA/CA), International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 2, 2013, for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2013/000456. |
Chawla, V., et al., “An Overview of Passive RFID”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 45, Issue 9, Sep. 2007, pp. 11 to 17. |
Stewart Thomas, et al., “QAM Backscatter for Passive UHF RFID Tags”, RFID, 2010 IEEE International Conference On, pp. 210-214, Apr. 14-16, 2010, Orlando, Florida, USA. |
International Searching Authority (ISA/CA), International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 9, 2015, for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/000745. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2013/000456 dated Jan. 13, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2014/000745 dated Mar. 28, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/CA2014/000151 dated May 13, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2014/000151 dated Feb. 16, 2016. |
Viikari, V., et al., “Ranging of UHF RFID Tag Using Stepped Frequency Read-Out,” in IEEE Sensors Jounal, vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 1535-1539, Sep. 2010. |
Violino, B., “The Basics of RFID Technology”, RFID Journal., Jan. 2005, pp. 1-4. |
D. Arnitz, et. al. “Multifrequency Continuous-Wave Radar Approach to Ranging in Passive UHF RFID”. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 57, No. 5, May 2009, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170310513 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14493262 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 15513100 | US |