The present disclosure relates to a transmission control circuit for the control of a system pressure provided by a pressure pump in a transmission of a working machine, with a pressure control valve for setting the provided system pressure to a maximum system pressure, an electronic control unit and a pressure limiting valve that can be activated by the control unit.
Conventional transmission control circuits for the control of a system pressure in a transmission control the system pressure to a predefined constant pressure level. The pressure level is selected to be sufficiently high that the hydraulically operated clutches and brakes within the transmission can transfer torque without slip even under high load. This design achieves a high capability of torque transfer capacity on the one hand, but takes into account that the pressure pump provides the high pressure level continuously, even if this would sometimes not be necessary for the reliable transfer of torque. From the viewpoints of efficiency and consumption, it would be desirable to deliberately relieve the load on the pressure pump if a reduced system pressure would be sufficient for reliable torque transfer. In particular, it would be desirable to variably adapt a reduced system pressure to currently existing operating conditions of the working machine.
The present disclosure provides a transmission control circuit for variable control of a system pressure in a transmission.
In one embodiment, a transmission control circuit is provided for the control of a system pressure provided by a pressure pump in a transmission of a working machine, with a pressure control valve for setting the provided system pressure to a maximum system pressure p0, an electronic control unit, by means of which load states and operating states of the working machine can be detected and in which the transmission input torque limits L1, 2, . . . n associated with the load states and at least one state value representing a first operating state and at least one state value representing a second operating state are stored, wherein the first operating state is associated with the maximum system pressure p0 and the second operating state is associated with a system pressure p1, 2, . . . n that is reduced relative to the maximum system pressure p0, a pressure limiting valve, which can be activated by the control unit to overrule the pressure control valve in order to variably adjust the reduced system pressure p1, 2, . . . n, wherein activation of the pressure limiting valve takes place depending on a comparison of a detected load state with a transmission input torque limit L1, 2, . . . n with the simultaneous existence of a second operating state.
In this disclosure, a distinction is made between load state and operating state. A load state is defined as a state in which a torque is being transferred by means of the transmission of the working machine. An operating state is defined as a switching state in which although no torque is being transferred by means of the transmission, torque can be transferred, and in which the working machine or parts thereof are in a certain “selected” state such as, for example, a four-wheel drive mode, engaged differential lock, no-load mode. According to this disclosure, it is further provided that regarding operating states a distinction is made between first operating states and second operating states. Following the identification of a first operating state, setting the maximum system pressure is hereby forced regardless of the currently existing load state. If by contrast a second operating state is identified, the maximum system pressure or a reduced system pressure is set depending on the currently existing load state. In principle, it is assumed that a failed activation of the pressure limiting valve results in no overruling of the pressure control valve, so that the maximum system pressure is set. Activation of the pressure limiting valve, on the other hand, results in overruling of the pressure control valve as determined by the system, so that a reduced system pressure is set compared to the maximum system pressure.
In the present disclosure, the transmission control circuit can reduce the necessary drive power for the pressure pump. The drive power for the pressure pump can be a parasitic load. Because the pressure control valve can be overruled, the system pressure can be adapted to a currently existing demand on the system pressure within the transmission in a certain load and operating state. The demand on the system pressure can be described as a torque transfer capability of a power shift clutch. Considering the entire transmission, there is a defined number of load paths, wherein each of said load paths can extend over a plurality of power shift clutches. The torque transfer capacity of each load path is thus determined by the clutch with the lowest torque transfer capacity. Transmission input torque limits result from said load paths with their respective torque transfer capacities, with which for their part in turn discrete system pressures can be associated, wherein the maximum system pressure set by the pressure control valve is associated with the load path with the maximum necessary torque transfer capacity, i.e., the highest transmission input torque limit.
In the present disclosure, any number of different system pressures below the maximum system pressure can be variably set as a result of the proportional overruling of the pressure control valve by the pressure limiting valve. In one embodiment, system pressures are provided at four pressure levels below the maximum system pressure.
The control unit detects a load state using a determined transmission input torque Mtrans, so that electronic activation of the pressure limiting valve is carried out depending on the relationship of the determined transmission input torque Mtrans to a transmission input torque limit L1, 2, . . . n. The transmission input torque can be directly sensed in a simple manner or indirectly determined from other available values.
The electronic activation of the pressure limiting valve for setting a reduced system pressure p1, 2, . . . n takes place if the determined transmission input torque Mtrans lies below a transmission input torque limit L1, 2, . . . n. This results in a simple control criterion for setting a reduced system pressure.
The electronic activation of the pressure limiting valve for increasing a reduced system pressure p1, 2, . . . n takes place if the measured transmission input torque Mtrans lies above a transmission input torque limit L1, 2, . . . n. This also results in a simple control criterion for setting a reduced system pressure.
Increasing the reduced system pressure p1, 2, . . . n in the presence of a suitable control criterion is carried out immediately without a time delay, whereas if there is a suitable control criterion for setting a reduced system pressure p1, 2 . . . n the corresponding transmission input torque limit is multiplied by a hysteresis factor hx<1. It can also be provided that the torque is below the modified transmission input torque limit at least for a defined period of time, t. The activation results in the prevention of pressure fluctuations.
The transmission input torque Mtrans is determined based on a drive torque Meng of a drive unit of the working machine. Here, the drive torque Meng of the drive unit is a parameter that is known by the control unit.
Parasitic loads are included for determining the transmission input torque Mtrans from the drive torque Meng. This enables more accurate determination of the transmission input torque Mtrans.
In another embodiment, the pressure limiting valve sets the reduced system pressure by manipulating a spring force of a spring-piston unit of the pressure control valve. Moreover, the basic design of the pressure control valve can be retained on the one hand and on the other hand the same is responsible both for setting the maximum system pressure and also a reduced system pressure.
In another embodiment, a relief point of the provided system pressure in the coolant circuit can be adjusted by manipulating the spring force of the spring piston unit of the pressure control valve. As such, the existing configuration of the hydraulics at this point does not have to be altered, because the existing relief point of the pressure control valve would only be made adjustable by overruling the pressure limiting valve.
A first operating state may be characterized by a differential lock being in an engaged state or by a state of increased slip within the transmission. As a result of said grouping, the control unit is in a position to decide whether the maximum system pressure is necessary or a reduced system pressure is sufficient.
A second operating state may be characterized by an unloaded no-load state or a differential lock or a power take-off in the working machine being in a disengaged state. As a result of said grouping the control unit is in a position to decide whether the maximum system pressure is necessary or a reduced system pressure is sufficient.
An existing activation of the pressure limiting valve remains unaltered by the control unit during a transmission shift process. Here a shift process is defined as shifting from one gear to another gear. Unwanted influence on the modulation during the shift process or the clutch process can be prevented here.
In the event of concurrent activation signals by the control unit for the pressure limiting valve, the signal corresponding to a higher system pressure is prioritized.
In another embodiment, a method is provided for the control of a transmission control circuit as described herein.
The above-mentioned aspects of the present disclosure and the manner of obtaining them will become more apparent and the disclosure itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of the embodiments of the disclosure, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The embodiments of the present disclosure described below are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms in the following detailed description. Rather, the embodiments are chosen and described so that others skilled in the art may appreciate and understand the principles and practices of the present disclosure.
A plurality of essentially identical valve units, which are also not shown, are provided for operating the power shift clutches 34. The valve units are supplied with a system pressure for operating the power shift clutches 34 by means of the hydraulic circuit, A, in
The transmission control circuit 10 includes a pressure pump 12 in the form of a transmission oil pump, a pressure control valve 14, a control unit 16, a pressure limiting valve 18, an oil cooler 20, an oil reservoir 22 and an oil filter 24, as shown in
The system pressure provided by the oil pump 12 is first set by the pressure control valve 14 to a maximum system pressure p0 in the hydraulic circuit A. In this case the pressure limiting valve 18, which is implemented as a solenoid valve, is not energized or is not activated by the control unit 16. Depending on the already described load and operating states, which are detected by the control unit 16, activation of the pressure limiting valve 18 can be carried out by the control unit 16, whereby the pressure limiting valve 18 overrules the pressure control valve 14. The overruling takes place by the pressure limiting valve 18 varying the supporting force acting on the piston-spring unit of the pressure control valve 14. In this way the force equilibrium between the current system pressure acting on the piston and the spring force acting on the piston can be set. The force equilibrium corresponds to the relief point from which the system pressure is released in the coolant circuit.
In
In
In principle, it can be provided that a reduced system pressure p1, p2, p3, p4 below the maximum system pressure p0 is only set if a revolution rate sensor of the internal combustion engine 44 senses a revolution rate above a revolution rate limit such as, for example, 50 revolutions per minute (rpm), and if at the same time a temperature sensor of the transmission 32 senses an oil temperature above a temperature limit such as, for example, 40° C. The latter criterion ensures rapid heating of the transmission oil.
Furthermore, continuous pressure monitoring is provided by means of which the system pressure selected by the control unit 16, i.e., the target system pressure, is compared with the actually existing system pressure, i.e. the actual system pressure.
In
While embodiments incorporating the principles of the present disclosure have been described hereinabove, the present disclosure is not limited to the described embodiments. Instead, this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the disclosure using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this disclosure pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2013 205 358 | Mar 2013 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation application of PCT International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2014/000562, which has an international filing date of Mar. 20, 2014 and designates the United States of America, and which claims the benefit of German Application Ser. No. 102013205358.4, filed on Mar. 26, 2013. The disclosures of these aforementioned applications are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6470247 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
20020107108 | Last | Aug 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
352735 | Feb 2007 | AT |
2002300958 | Aug 2007 | AU |
102005028848 | Jan 2007 | DE |
60217933 | May 2007 | DE |
1436532 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1541901 | Jun 2005 | EP |
03031846 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
German Search Report in foreign counterpart application No. 10 2013 205 358.4, dated Oct. 17, 2016 (5 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160025211 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/IB2014/000562 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 14860925 | US |