The invention relates to wireless communication systems, and more particularly, to a transmission method and apparatus for cancelling inter-carrier interference in multi-carrier communication systems.
OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) is a multi-carrier modulation method with which the transmission data is modulated over multiple sub-carriers and then transmitted in parallel. This method is widely applied in wireless communication systems due to its good characteristics of resisting frequency selective fading and narrow-band interference. The OFDM system is very sensitive to frequency offsets, such as the carrier frequency offset caused by the frequency offset between the transmitter and the receiver. The carrier frequency offset leads to a series of problems, for example, sub-carrier phase rotation, amplitude fading and ICI (inter-carrier interference), which limit the application of the OFDM technology. Therefore, how to cancel the inter-carrier interference is very important for the OFDM system.
A transmission method and apparatus for cancelling inter-carrier interference in OFDM systems is disclosed in a patent application published with No. EP 1496659A1 on Jan. 12, 2005, entitled “Transmitting and receiving apparatus and method in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing system using an insufficient cyclic prefix”. The OFDM system has N sub-carriers, wherein K sub-carriers are designated as redundant sub-carriers. A transmission apparatus, provided by the patent application, comprises a P filter, for receiving (N-K) data symbols and generating K virtual data symbols, and an IFFT (Inverse Fast Fourier Transformer) having N input taps corresponding to the N sub-carriers. The IFFT receives the (N-K) data symbols and the K virtual data symbols corresponding to the redundant sub-carriers, and performs inverse fast Fourier transformation on the (N-K) data symbols and the K virtual data symbols to output a data frame. Here, the K virtual data symbols are set to a certain value so that the value of the time domain signals that generate ICI is zero in the data frame, resulting in cancellation of the interferences generated among multiple sub-carriers.
In a practical communication system, a plurality of sub-carriers corresponding to an OFDM symbol can generally further carry data with different characteristics, specifically, carry data on the common channels and data on the traffic channels simultaneously. Data with different characteristics will generate different ICI. For example, data on the broadcast channels and the synchronization channels generally will bring larger interference to data transmitted in parallel on the traffic channel due to its higher transmitting power, and sometimes even will become a bottle-neck problem for the transmission design.
There exists a need to provide an effective transmission method and apparatus to cancel interference from a set of consecutive sub-carriers to another set of sub-carriers.
A technical problem to be solved in the present invention is to cancel the interference from a set of consecutive sub-carriers to another set of sub-carriers in a plurality of sub-carriers corresponding to the same transmission symbol.
To achieve the above object, the invention provides a transmission method for cancelling inter-carrier interference in wireless communication systems, comprising: first, configuring at least one isolated sub-carrier between a first set of sub-carriers and a second set of sub-carriers; second, determining the data values on the isolated sub-carriers such that the inter-carrier interference, resulting from the isolated sub-carriers, to the second set of sub-carriers compensates the inter-carrier interference resulting from the first set of sub-carriers to the second set of sub-carriers; and finally, transmitting the data via a plurality of sub-carriers comprising the first set of sub-carriers, the second set of sub-carriers and the isolated sub-carriers.
The invention also provides a transmission apparatus for cancelling inter-carrier interference in wireless communication systems, comprising: a configuration unit, for configuring at least one isolated sub-carrier between a first set of sub-carriers and a second set of sub-carriers; a determination unit, for determining the data values on the isolated sub-carriers such that the inter-carrier interference, resulting from the isolated sub-carriers, to the second set of sub-carriers compensates the inter-carrier interference resulting from the first set of sub-carriers to the second set of sub-carriers; and a transmission unit, for transmitting the data on a plurality of sub-carriers comprising the first set of sub-carriers, the second set of sub-carriers and the isolated sub-carriers.
In sum, with the transmission method and apparatus provided by the invention, the interference from a set of consecutive sub-carriers to another set of sub-carriers can be cancelled effectively when the two sets of consecutive sub-carriers are parts of a plurality of sub-carriers corresponding to a same transmission symbol.
Other aspects and attainments together with a fuller understanding of the invention will become apparent and appreciated by referring to the following descriptions and claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Throughout all the above drawings, like reference numerals will be understood to refer to like, similar or corresponding features or functions.
Detailed descriptions will be made below to the transmission method and apparatus for ICI cancellation provided in the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The transmission method for ICI cancellation provided in the invention helps to cancel the interference from a set of interfering source sub-carriers to the target sub-carriers by configuring at least an isolated sub-carriers between the set of interfering source sub-carriers and the set of target sub-carriers and further setting a certain value for the isolated sub-carriers.
In the transmission method for ICI cancellation in
In a practical communication system, when a plurality of sub-carriers corresponding to an OFDM symbol carry data on the common channels (such as, broadcast channel and SYN channel) and data on the traffic channels simultaneously, the common channels usually occupy a set of sub-carriers at the central frequency in the overall transmission band. For example, in an E-UTRA mobile communication system with different transmission bandwidths, its downlink common channels generally occupy a set of sub-carriers in the middle of the bands to adapt the changes of the transmission bandwidths, i.e. when the transmission bandwidth configured for a cell ranges between 1.25 MHz and 20 MHz. This means that both sides of the common channels can be used for traffic channels and meanwhile the traffic channels will experience interferences from the data on the common channels. In this case, there is a need to configure the isolated sub-carriers at both sides of the common channels to cancel ICI.
The ICI (inter carrier interference) is unique to wireless communication systems that are based on OFDM or other multi-carrier techniques and generally caused by the incomplete orthogonality between several sub-carriers, such as the carrier frequency offset between the transmitter and the receiver, the Doppler frequency offset and so on. Taking an OFDM system with 16 sub-carriers as an example, when the orthogonality between the sets of sub-carriers is destroyed, the data on a sub-carrier will experience interference from the data on other sub-carriers. Referring to “Analysis of new and existing methods of reducing inter-carrier interference due to carrier frequency offset in OFDM”, Jean Armstrong, IEEE Trans. Commun., 1999, 47, 3:365-369, the interference to the i.sup.th sub-carrier from the data on other sub-carriers can be given by:
##EQU00001##
di′=c0di+l=0.about.15l.noteq.icl−idl (1)
Where d.sub.i is the data sent on the i.sup.th sub-carrier, d.sub.i is the corresponding data received at the receiver, c.sub.l−i is the coefficient for the interference on the i.sup.th sub-carrier resulting from the date on the l.sup.th sub-carrier, c.sub.0 is the transmission coefficient for the useful signal d.sub.i, and 0.ltoreq.i.ltoreq.15, −15.ltoreq.l−i.ltoreq.15.
In the diagram of
In the sub-carrier configuration as shown in
##EQU00002##
Dt1=n=s1s2Dn.alpha.n1, Dt2=n=s1s2Dn.alpha.n2 (2)
Where .alpha..sub.n.sup.1 and .alpha..sub.n.sup.2 are the weighting factors corresponding to the n.sup.th sub-carrier in the set of interfering source sub-carriers, D.sub.n is the data carried on the corresponding sub-carriers, s.sub.1 and s.sub.2 are respectively the sequence numbers for the first and the N.sup.th sub-carriers in the set of interfering source sub-carriers, and N is the number of sub-carriers in the set of interfering source sub-carriers.
In the sub-carrier configuration as shown in
##EQU00003##
Dt1=.beta.2.beta.1+.beta.2*n=s1s2Dn.alpha.n1,Dt2=.beta.2.beta.1+.beta.2*n=s1s2Dn.alpha.n1 (3-1)
Dt3=.beta.1.beta.1+.beta.2*n=s1s2Dn.alpha.n2,Dt4=.beta.2.beta.1+.beta.2*n=s1s2Dn.alpha.n2 (3-2)
Where .beta..sub.1 and .beta..sub.2 are respectively the interference allocation factors for the two isolated sub-carriers, and the other parameters have the same meaning as those in Equation (2).
The weighting factors .alpha..sub.n.sup.1 and .alpha..sub.n.sup.2 in Equations (2), (3-1) and (3-2) can be determined on the basis of the characteristics that the ICI varies with respect to the carrier frequency offset, and the data values on the isolated sub-carriers can be optimized by this so that the interference from the isolated sub-carriers to the target sub-carriers can compensate most of the interference resulting from the interfering source sub-carriers to the target sub-carriers.
When the inference coefficient between the interfering source sub-carriers and the target sub-carriers is inversely proportional to the frequency offset between the interfering source sub-carriers and the target sub-carriers, the .alpha..sub.n.sup.1 and .alpha..sub.n.sup.2 can be given by:
##EQU00004##
.alpha.n1=−1N−n+1=.alpha.n2 (4)
When the interfering source sub-carriers only occupy a small portion of the overall transmission bandwidth and the inference coefficient between the interfering source sub-carriers and the target sub-carriers goes flat with respect to the frequency offset between the interfering source sub-carriers and the target sub-carriers, the .alpha..sub.n.sup.1 and .alpha..sub.n.sup.2 can be given by:
##EQU00005##
.alpha.n1=−12=.alpha.n2 (5)
With the above equations (2), (3) or (4), the data values on the isolated sub-carriers configured under different application scenarios can be set.
In practical deployment of communication systems, the above method of transmitting one data by two sub-carriers to cancel ICI mentioned before are generally not used because the transmission efficiency for the method can only reach 50%. A common approach is to set the sub-carriers that are adjacent to the interfering source having more serious interference idle, i.e. set as the idle sub-carriers, therefore the idle sub-carrier scheme is taken as the reference scheme in the simulation to launch performance comparison.
As indicated in
In sum, the reciprocal function scheme obtains better performance than the idle sub-carrier scheme in all situations and thus can be taken as a commonly used scheme. The fixed weighting factor scheme can achieve optimal performance when the target sub-carriers are far away from the interfering source and thus can be used in some particular situations, for example, when minimum sum of the interference powers on the overall target sub-carriers is requested.
On the other hand, the isolated sub-carrier scheme will cause only slight loss of the transmission efficiency. Table 1 provides the transmission efficiency loss analysis caused by the ICI cancellation method provided in the invention by taking a practical 3GPP LTE system as an example. It can be known from Table 1 that this method only cause slight transmission efficiency loss, especially when the transmission bandwidth is large, the loss of transmission efficiency can almost be ignored.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Transmission efficiency loss analysis Transmission Bandwidth 1.25 MHz 2.5 MHz 5 MHz 10 MHz 15 MHz 20 MHz Total 76 151 301 601 901 1201 sub-carriers Interfering 76 76 76 76 76 76 source sub-carriers Isolated 2˜4 2 2 2 2 2 sub-carriers Transmission 2.6%˜5.3% 1.3% 0.66% 0.33% 0.22% 0.17% efficiency loss
The method for cancelling interference from a set of interfering source sub-carriers to a set of target sub-carriers taken in conjunction with
The configuration unit 10 is mainly used for configuring at least one isolated sub-carrier between a first set of sub-carriers, namely interfering source sub-carriers, and a second set of sub-carriers, namely target sub-carriers. The specific operations can be referred in the configuration scheme shown in
The determination unit 20 is mainly used for determining the data values on the isolated sub-carriers such that the inter-carrier interference, resulting from the configured isolated sub-carrier, to the target sub-carriers compensates the inter-carrier interference resulting from the interfering source sub-carriers to the target sub-carriers. The method for determining the data values on the isolated sub-carriers can be referred in Equations (2), (3-1), (3-2) and (4) with reference to the configuration schemes shown in
The transmission unit 30 is mainly used for transmitting the data on a plurality of sub-carriers comprising the interfering source sub-carriers, the target sub-carriers and the isolated sub-carriers. In an OFDM system, there is generally a step for transforming the data on the sub-carriers corresponding to an OFDM symbol from the frequency domain to the time domain by using the IFFT, before outputting the data corresponding to a plurality of sub-carriers to the transmission antenna. The transformation is a common general knowledge implemented with OFDM technologies and the description is omitted herein.
It is to be understood by those skilled in the art that the invention applies not only to OFDM systems, but also to MC-CDMA (Multi-Carrier Code Division Multiple Access) systems and SC-FDMA (Single Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access) systems that have multi-carrier characteristics.
It is to be understood by those skilled in the art that the specific embodiments in the invention are intended to be illustrative rather than limiting. Various improvements and modifications can be made to the method and apparatus for ICI cancellation in wireless communication systems as provided in the present invention without departing from the basis of the present invention, the scope of which is to be defined by the attached claims herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006 1 0121323 | Aug 2006 | CN | national |
This application claims the benefit or priority of and describes relationships between the following applications: wherein this application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/438,161, filed Feb. 20, 2009, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IB2007/053154, filed Aug. 9, 2007, which claims the priority of foreign application CN 200610121323.1 filed Aug. 21, 2006, all of which are incorporated herein in whole by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7864905 | Wu | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8027417 | Jia | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8520750 | Zhang | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20050147176 | Yun | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050259568 | Yeh | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060171354 | Tee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060239367 | Wilhelmsson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2006111843 | Oct 2006 | AU |
1496659 | Jan 2005 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Sathanathan et al, “New ICI Reduction Schemes for OFDM System”, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 2 of 4, Conf. 54, Oct. 7, 2001, pp. 834-838. |
Jean Armstrong, “Analysis of New and Existing Methods of Reducing Intercarrier Interference Due to Carrier Frequency Offset in OFDM”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 47, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 365-369. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130308587 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12438161 | US | |
Child | 13955022 | US |