1. Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to power and control transmission systems, and specifically to, power and control transmission over RF coaxial cables.
2. Description of Related Art
Network analyzers and other types of measuring instruments are used to measure the magnitude and/or phase of a signal present in a device-under-test (DUT). For example, network analyzers can be used to determine the impedance, gain, group delay, gain compression and other characteristics of mobile telecommunications devices, such as base station antennas, amplifiers, cables and attenuators.
To perform a measurement, the instrument is connected to the DUT via one or more couplers that are strategically placed on one or more feeder cables of the DUT. To interface with the DUT, the instrument supplies RF signals, power and control signals to the coupler(s). For example, when using a network analyzer to measure the antenna return loss of a base station antenna, the RF signals can correspond to a swept signal injected into the feeder cable of a base station antenna. If there are any discontinuities in the feeder cable or antenna, part of the signal may be reflected back down the feeder cable to the network analyzer via the coupler. The control signals from the network analyzer control the RF switches in the coupler. For example, the coupler can be programmed to couple forward power, reverse power or calibration path signals to/from the network analyzer depending upon the states (on/off) of the RF switches in the coupler.
Traditionally, each coupler had separate ports for RF signals (injected signal and reflected signal), power and control signals. Likewise, the instrument also had separate ports for each coupler for the RF signals, power and control signals. The RF signal ports of the instrument and coupler were connected together via coaxial cables, while the power and control ports of the instrument and coupler were connected together via one or more multi-conductor cable assemblies. Depending upon the particular DUT, each of the cables used for connecting the instrument to the DUT could potentially be 40 feet long. Such cables are expensive and difficult to install (i.e., each cable may take up to 30 minutes to install). In addition, for outdoor installations, each cable represents a possible point of water ingress into the coupler.
In systems that require only RF signals and power (no control signals), such as high frequency microwave circuit systems, the RF and power signals can be multiplexed onto a single coaxial cable. The RF signals are transmitted over the RF cable and DC power is transmitted over the center conductor of the cable. A bias network on either side of the coaxial cable separates the RF and power signals. For example, a bias network can include a capacitor to block DC power and an inductor to block the RF signals.
However, in systems that require RF signals, power and control signals, there is currently no mechanism for multiplexing the control signals with the power or the RF signals. Therefore, what is needed is a transmission system for RF signals, power and control signals with a reduced amount of cabling.
The present invention provides a transmission system for RF signals, power and control signals over RF coaxial cables. A coaxial cable line interconnects a first device with a second device. A control signal (e.g., data bit) and RF signals are multiplexed onto the coaxial cable line using a bias network at each end of the coaxial cable.
In certain embodiments, power is generated at the second device (e.g., a remote coupler) based on the state of the control bits generated at the first device (e.g., instrument). Each coaxial cable carries one control bit on the center conductor of the cable. A table maps the states of the one or more control bits to the desired states in the remote coupler. The all-zeroes state for the control bits is disallowed, such that at any given time, at least one of the control lines is high (e.g., at +5V). A passive network at the coupler generates the power supply voltage for the coupler from the control bits. In further embodiments, a power supply filter is provided at the coupler to supply power to the coupler during transitions of the passive network.
Advantageously, multiplexing RF signals with control signals over RF coaxial cable lines enables power to be supplied to the coupler without dedicating a separate cable for power. Therefore, the number of cables required for interfacing the instrument to the coupler is reduced. Furthermore, the invention provides embodiments with other features and advantages in addition to or in lieu of those discussed above. Many of these features and advantages are apparent from the description below with reference to the following drawings.
The disclosed invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, which show important sample embodiments of the invention and which are incorporated in the specification hereof by reference, wherein:
The numerous innovative teachings of the present application will be described with particular reference to the exemplary embodiments. However, it should be understood that these embodiments provide only a few examples of the many advantageous uses of the innovative teachings herein. In general, statements made in the specification do not necessarily delimit any of the various claimed inventions. Moreover, some statements may apply to some inventive features, but not to others.
Referring now to
A control signal (e.g., a data bit) and RF signals are multiplexed onto one of the coaxial cable lines 110 using a bias network 120 at each end of the cable 110. The bias network 120 can be any type of circuitry capable of multiplexing/de-multiplexing data with RF signals. As an example,
An exemplary implementation of the transmission system of the present invention is illustrated in
The two control bits D0 and D1 are received at control circuitry 350 within the coupler 300. For example, the control circuitry 350 can include one or more RF switches in the coupler 300, and the control bits D0 and D1 can control the states of the RF switches. As an example, the coupler 300 can be programmed to couple forward power, reverse power or calibration path signals to/from the instrument depending upon the states (on/off) of the RF switches in the coupler 300. The two control bits D0 and D1 are also received at a passive network 320 at the coupler 300 over respective control lines 310a and 310b. The passive network 320 generates the power supply voltage to the control circuitry 350 of the coupler 300 from the control bits D0 and D1.
Each control bit D0 and D1 is either in an “on” or “off” state, i.e., the control line 310a and 310b is either at 0 Volts or +5 Volts, corresponding to a “0” or “1” bit. When either one or both of the control bits D0 and D1 is at “1” (i.e., one or both of the control lines 310a and 310b is high), +5 Volts is received at the passive network 320 over the control line 310a and/or 310b and provided to the control circuitry 350 over a power line 340 as the power supply voltage. During transitions of the passive network 320 from D0 high to D1 high or vice-versa, power supply filter 330 that is connected to the power line 340 supplies power to the control circuitry 350 of the coupler 300. For example, the power supply filter 330 can include a grounded capacitor 335 that is charged up to +5 Volts and discharges when no power is present on the power line 340. Although two control bits D0 and D1 are illustrated in
A table maps the states of the one or more control bits to the desired states of the control circuitry in the remote coupler.
Power=D0 OR D1 OR . . . Dn,
where n is the number of control bits supplied to the coupler from the instrument.
As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, the innovative concepts described in the present application can be modified and varied over a wide range of applications. Accordingly, the scope of patented subject matter should not be limited to any of the specific exemplary teachings discussed, but is instead defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3701059 | Nyswander | Oct 1972 | A |
3701851 | Starrett | Oct 1972 | A |
4381456 | Saito et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4597077 | Nelson et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4763076 | Arakawa et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4788675 | Jones et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5263021 | Ortel | Nov 1993 | A |
5321849 | Lemson | Jun 1994 | A |
5343240 | Yu | Aug 1994 | A |
5543713 | Arakawa et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5600471 | Hirohashi et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5678198 | Lemson | Oct 1997 | A |
5781422 | Lavin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5818846 | Mori et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5960005 | Moteki et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6014546 | Georges et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6377665 | Willer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6449362 | Tennyson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6593803 | Yoshizawa | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6697611 | Franca-Neto | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6958607 | Vaughan et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
20020095690 | Berger et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030008629 | Tegeler et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050100178 | Rybicki et al. | May 2005 | A1 |