Transmitter and receiver calibration for obtaining the channel reciprocity for time division duplex MIMO systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9236998
  • Patent Number
    9,236,998
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 17, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 12, 2016
    9 years ago
Abstract
A communication device operating in time division duplex (TDD) mode using multiple antennas is provided herein. The communication device uses receive channel estimation measurements to perform transmit beamforming and multiple input multiple output (MIMO) transmission, based on self-calibration of the various up/down paths via a method of transmission and reception between its own antennas, thus achieving reciprocity mapping between up and down links. Either user equipment (UE) or a base station may routinely perform this self-calibration to obtain the most current correction factor for the channel reciprocity to reflect the most current operating conditions present during TDD MIMO operation.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the transmitter and receiver calibration to obtain the channel reciprocity for multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) systems as well as for SISO and MISO systems, in which the transmit and receive operate in the same spectrum (for example, TDD, WiFi,) so that the feedback of channel state information can be reduced or eliminated for the MIMO operation. Here “time division duplex” (TDD) for the wireless communication systems is referred to in general for systems using the same frequency spectrum for methods of communications in a time division manner.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Prior to setting forth a short discussion of the related art, it may be helpful to set forth definitions of certain terms that will be used hereinafter.


The term “MIMO” as used herein, is defined as the use of multiple antennas at both the transmitter and receiver to improve communication performance. MIMO offers significant increases in data throughput and link range without additional bandwidth or increased transmit power. It achieves this goal by spreading the transmit power over the antennas to achieve spatial multiplexing that improves the spectral efficiency (more bits per second per Hz of bandwidth) or to achieve a diversity gain that improves the link reliability (reduced fading), or increased antenna directivity.


The term “TDD” (Time Division Duplex) as used herein, is defined as the use of the same or a single channel (e.g., the same or overlapping frequency spectrum) for both downlink and uplink transmissions. For example, TDD communication, e.g., between a mobile device and a base station, may periodically alternate between uplink transmissions (e.g. from the mobile device to a base station for a predetermined uplink interval or period, such as, 5 milliseconds (ms)) and downlink transmissions (e.g. from a base station to a mobile device or UE for a predetermined downlink period, such as, 5 ms). The base station typically coordinates the alternating timing between uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) transmissions.


The term “beamforming” sometimes referred to as “spatial filtering” as used herein, is a signal processing technique used in antenna arrays for directional signal transmission or reception. This is achieved by combining elements in the array in such a way that signals at particular angles experience constructive interference while others experience destructive interference. Beamforming can be used at both the transmitting and receiving ends in order to achieve spatial selectivity.


The term “beamformer” as used herein refers to RF circuitry that implements beamforming and usually includes a combiner and may further include switches, controllable phase shifters, and in some cases amplifiers and/or attenuators.


A transmitter in a MIMO system requires channel state information (CSI) so that a set of precoded weights can be set to the multiple data streams of the transmitter, in order to exploit the channels for the multiple spatial channel transmission. Typically, the receiver can feed the CSI or even the preferred pre-coding matrix (index) back to the transmitter. These feedbacks can consume some available bandwidth of the transmission in the opposite direction and reduce the data throughput. If transmission in both directions operate in the same spectrum, like in the case of time division duplex (TDD) systems, the channels through the air are reversible and the channel information can be estimated by the receive device and then applied to the transmit device.


However, a complete transmission channel should be from the transmitter baseband to the receiver baseband, which includes various components inside the transmitter (e.g., DAC, up converter, power amplifier, filter) and receiver (e.g., duplexer, LNA, down converter, filter, ADC). The transmission path and receive path may thus experience very different gain/loss and delays behavior, due to the different components used in both paths. Channel reciprocity without considering the different delay and gain/loss factors between the transmit/receive paths are therefore not valid and may not be accurate enough for the use by devices in TDD MIMO systems. These parameters can also be factory calibrated. One important element that jeopardizes reciprocity is antennas, which project slightly different radiation patterns at Up and Down Links, due to differences in the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) in both directions. Antenna VSWR cannot be practically calibrated in the factory, due to the cost of such procedures.


In beamforming applications there are benefits in using uplink signals' channel estimation for downlink beamforming, i.e. for establishment of calculated reciprocity A method and apparatus for self-calibration of the transmitter and receiver paths is disclosed herein (between base band and transmit/receive antennas) of a MIMO device to obtain the precise channel reciprocity information necessary for improving the (TDD) MIMO systems.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

There is now provided according to embodiments of the invention a calibration method to improve TDD MIMO system for effectively overcoming the aforementioned difficulties inherent in the art.


According to an embodiment of the invention, communication devices are provided in a MIMO system. The communication device may be static such as a base station, or may be mobile such as user equipment (UE). The communication device may include a plurality of M antennas for TDD MIMO operation. Each antenna may be used for both transmit and receive paths. The communication device may include switches to provide extra paths in the receiving path of each radio. One of the multiple receiving paths will be implemented via the path used for the regular operation. Another receiving path may consist of an attenuator to provide an additional path loss (for example, 20 dB) so that the Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) will not be saturated by the strong calibration signal during the calibration process.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may perform the following self-calibration processes to obtain the correction factor for the channel reciprocity information. A communication device may transmit the calibration signals from one antenna/radio while itself measures the calibration signals through another antenna/radio under three calibration configuration setups: (A) the calibration signals are transmitted in high power mode (at maximum output power allowed), the receive path should include an attenuator (e.g., 20 dB attenuation) in front of the LNA to safe guard the LNA, (B) the calibration signal is transmitted in lower power mode (e.g., digitally attenuated by 20 dB), the receive path includes the extra attenuation (such as, in a non-limiting example, 20 dB), and (C) the calibration signal is transmitted in lower power mode while the receive path is through the path used in the normal operation mode. The received calibration signals in these three calibration setups can then derive the correction factor between these two antennas to account for the channel reciprocity information. This calibration process may be repeated for all the antennas to be used in MIMO transmit and receive. Both transmit and receive radio paths of each antenna should be calibrated at least once. For example, we may pair each of the M−1 antennas with the first antenna for two calibrations (one transmit, one receive). With (2M−2) calibrations, we may get all the correction factors for the devices consisting of M antennas/radios.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects, features, and advantages thereof, may best be more fully understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of channel description for a TDD MIMO system according to some embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of effective channel including the transmit and receive paths for channel reciprocity according to some embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 3 depicts an exemplary UE self-calibration configuration for Step (a) according to some embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary UE self-calibration configuration for Step (b) according to some embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 5 shows an exemplary UE self-calibration configuration for Step (c) according to some embodiments of the present invention; and



FIG. 6 describes the logic flow contained in the self-calibration procedure according to some embodiments of the present invention.





It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In the following description, various aspects of the present invention will be described. For purposes of explanation, specific configurations and details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will also be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without the specific details presented herein. Furthermore, well known features may be omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the present invention.


Unless specifically stated otherwise, as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the specification discussions utilizing terms such as “processing,” “computing,” “calculating,” “determining,” or the like, refer to the action and/or processes of a computer or computing system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and/or transforms data represented as physical, such as electronic, quantities within the computing system's registers and/or memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computing system's memories, registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.


Embodiments of the present invention propose the calibration configurations and procedures to derive the correction factors on channel reciprocity information to make this information useful for improving the spectral efficiency in TDD MIMO systems.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, a communication device having a receive path is provided. The communication device may include a number M antennas and respective radio modules. The communication device may further include a processor operable in a baseband domain and configured to perform a self-calibration procedure by which a correction factor may be computed for a channel reciprocity level, determined by said self-calibration procedure. The communication device may further include a plurality of switches in each one of said radio modules configured to change the receive path for regular multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) operation or during the aforementioned calibration procedure. The communication device may further include a digital attenuator configured to adjust calibration signals in the baseband domain, wherein the communication device may be operative in a time division duplex (TDD) MIMO system.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may further include an antenna set that may be configured to alternate transmitting and receiving periods on a single channel according to a TDD communication protocol, wherein the aforementioned antenna set may be used for defining the phases employed in MIMO transitions and selected using information measured at the device during receiving periods based on channel reciprocity.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may further include means for supporting N×N MIMO transmissions and receptions, such that M≧N.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may further include multiple receive paths and a plurality of switches contained in the device, wherein some path losses included in the receive path between the receive antenna and a low noise amplifier (LNA); and switches which may change the receive paths used during regular MIMO operation and during calibration.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may further include processor or other baseband logic for digitally attenuating the calibration signal by an amount that is sufficient to prevent the LNA in the path undergoing calibration from saturating.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may further include a processor or other baseband logic performing the self-calibration procedure, in order to adjust for the differences in the transmit path and receive path for all the antenna/radios used in MIMO operation, wherein the correction factors are expressed by ρij, which is the ratio of the differences between the transmit and receive paths contained in the antenna/radio j and antenna/radio i for channel reciprocity.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may be further configured to perform the following self-calibration procedure in which one antenna/radio (i) acts as a transmitter and the other antenna/radio (j) acts as the receiver during the calibration procedure: performing the following for each two antennas/radios (i and j): selecting using a processor or other baseband logic two antennas/radios (i and j) for the following 3-step self-calibration procedure; emitting a calibration signal with the signal strength equivalent to the signal strength used during regular MIMO operation, the receiver using one receive path with some path loss to prevent LNA from saturation and recording the received calibration signal Raji; transmitting a calibration signal that is digitally attenuated, the receiver continually employing the same receive path used in said emitting step and recording the received calibration signal Rbji; transmitting a calibration signal that is digitally attenuated, the receiver switch selecting the receive path used for regular MIMO operation and recording the received calibration signal Rcji; and reversing the roles of transmitter and receiver for the two selected antennas/radios to repeat said self-calibration procedure and recording the three measured calibrated signals Raij, Rbij, and Rcij.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may be further operable to compute the correction factor on channel reciprocity by: performing the following for a calibrated antenna/radio and un-calibrated antenna/radio pair: selecting using a processor or other baseband logic a calibrated and un-calibrated pair to perform the 3-step calibration procedure after completing the calibration for the first pair; and repeating the calibration process until all the antennas/radios to be used for MIMO operations are all calibrated.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may be further operable to compute the correction factor on channel reciprocity by: using the processor or other baseband logic to determine the correction factor on channel reciprocity obtained with the calibration data for antenna/radio elements i and j, wherein said correction factor is expressed by ρij=(Raji*Rcji*Rbij)/(Rbji*Raij*Rcij).


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may further include: a timer; and said timer operable to be preset using said processor or other baseband logic to repeat the 3-step calibration procedure for all the antennas/radios to be used for MIMO operation by re-computing and updating the correction factors for channel reciprocity.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the communication device may be further operable to re-compute said correction factors for channel reciprocity based on the threshold of a changing condition by: presetting said processor or other baseband logic to re-compute and update the correction factors for channel reciprocity when said threshold is met; and repeating the 3-step calibration procedure for all the antennas/radios to be used for MIMO operation.



FIG. 1 illustrates a TDD MIMO system. Element 110 shows that the UE has M antennas and radios. Element 150 illustrates that the base station may also have M antennas and radios as well. Each antenna on these two devices may be used for both transmit and receive, but not simultaneously, in the TDD MIMO operation. The channels available over the air (between the antennas) are reversible, i.e., h1A=hA1, h2A=hA2, h1B=hB1, . . . , h1M=hM1. However, the MIMO signals are processed in the base band shown in elements 220 and 260 contained in FIG. 2. Hence, the effective channels considered for reciprocity should include the transmit path and the receive path of both communication devices (e.g., both base station and UE). As shown in FIG. 2, the effective channels {tilde over (h)}1A, {tilde over (h)}2A, {tilde over (h)}1B, and {tilde over (h)}2B, can then be expressed by the following equations:

{tilde over (h)}1A=CATx*h1A*C1Rx  (1)
{tilde over (h)}2A=CATx*h2A*C2Rx  (2)
{tilde over (h)}1B=CBTx*h1B*C1Rx  (3)
{tilde over (h)}2B=CBTx*h2B*C2Rx  (4)

where CA and CB are the gains/loss of the transmitters, and C1 and C2 are the gains/loss of the receivers.


In the exemplary TDD MIMO system shown in FIG. 2, the UE may perform a self-calibration, according to the embodiments of the present invention, to obtain the correction factor for obtaining the valid uplink channel information ({tilde over (h)}A1, {tilde over (h)}A2, {tilde over (h)}B1, and {tilde over (h)}B2) from its estimated downlink receiving channels ({tilde over (h)}1A, {tilde over (h)}2A, {tilde over (h)}1B, and {tilde over (h)}2B), those may be used to calculate the pre-coding weights for the UE's MIMO transmission.


According to one embodiment of this invention, the base station may perform a self-calibration process, to obtain the correction factor for the channel reciprocity so that the base station may apply the channel reciprocity to obtain the down link channel information from the estimated channels.


According to another embodiment of this invention, the self-calibration of a communication device is performed to determine the difference between the transmit path and receive path of each radio. This calibration may be done using its own two antennas/radios, one for transmit and the other for receive. The calibration process may be repeated until both transmit and receive paths for all the antennas/radios are calibrated. The calibration is done for the regular operation condition (i.e., power amplifiers operating in high power mode, and by low noise amplifiers in the receive paths that are not saturated.). The high power PA transmission may saturate the receiving LNA during the calibration since the transmit antenna/radio and the receive antenna/radio may be next to each other (i.e. in the same communication device). The extra attenuation path may be provided in the receive path to prevent the LNA from saturation during the calibration. The calibration process may be separated into three steps with three different calibration configurations (modes) to get rid of the impact of the extra attenuations/paths effects on the calibration.



FIG. 3 shows the configuration setup for the first step (a) of the calibration. The calibration signal Sc, is output from baseband element 330, and is transmitted from the first antenna/radio 310 with the nominal maximum power allowed in the regular operation. The calibration signal may be received, through antenna coupling C21, by the second antenna/radio 320. For Step (a) calibration, an extra attenuation (e.g., 20 dB) may be set in the receive path to prevent the LNA from saturating. The received calibration signal Ra21 at the base band can then be expressed by:

Ra21=Sc*C1Tx*C21*C2Rx20  (5)

wherein C1Tx is the gain/loss of the transmit path between the baseband and the first antenna when the power amplifier operates in high-power mode, C21 is the antenna coupling from transmit antenna (1) to receive antenna (2), and C2Rx20 is the gain/loss of the receive path between the second antenna and the baseband including the additional attenuation.


Here the extra attenuation of 20 dB is assumed during the Step (a) calibration. Note that the power amplifiers in MIMO transmission usually operate at high gain mode to support the high data rate communications.



400 (FIG. 4) shows the configuration setup for the second step (b) of the calibration. The calibration signal Sc, digitally attenuated by 20 dB and output from baseband 430, is transmitted from the first antenna/radio 410. The calibration signal may be received, through antenna coupling C21, by the second antenna/radio 420. For Step (b) calibration, an extra attenuation (e.g., 20 dB) may be kept in the receive path. The received calibration signal Rb21 at the base band can then be expressed by:

Rb21=Sc*C1Txl*C21*C2Rx20/10  (6)

Wherein C1Txl is the gain/loss of the transmit path between the baseband and the first antenna when the power amplifier operates in low-power mode. It should be noted that the division by 10 on the right hand side of Equation (6) indicates the calibration signal Sc power being digitally attenuated by 20 dB.



FIG. 5 shows the configuration setup for the third step (c) of the calibration. The calibration signal Sc, is digitally attenuated by 20 dB and output from baseband element 530, and is transmitted from the first antenna/radio 510. The calibration signal may be received, through antenna coupling C21, by the second antenna/radio 520. For step (c) calibration, the receive path is kept under the regular operation condition without the extra attenuation. The received calibration signal Rc21 at the baseband can then be expressed by:

Rc21=Sc*C1Txl*C21*C2Rx/10  (7)

Where C2Rx is the gain/loss of the receive path between the second antenna and the baseband under regular operation (i.e., excluding the extra attenuation).


Equation (5), (6), and (7) consist of the information of the transmit path of the first antenna/radio, C1Tx, and the receive path of the second antenna/radio, C2Rx, that are needed for deriving the correction factors on the channel reciprocity. The 3-step calibration may be repeated with the reverse of calibration signal transmission, i.e., the calibration signal is transmitted from the second antenna/radio and received by the first antenna/radio. The latter calibration will obtain the information of the receive path of the first antenna/radio, C1Rx, and the transmit path of the second antenna/radio, C2Tx, and can be expressed by the following equations, Eq. (8), (9) and (10):

Ra12=Sc*C2Tx*C12*C1Rx20  (8)
Rb12=Sc*C2Txl*C12*C1Rx20/10  (9)
Rc12=Sc*C2Txl*C12*C1Rx/10  (10)

Wherein C2Tx is the gain/loss of the transmit path between the baseband and the second antenna for power amplifier operating at high gain mode (regular MIMO operation), C2Txl is the gain/loss of the transmit path between the baseband and the second antenna when the power amplifier operates at low-power mode, C1Rx20 is the gain/loss of the receive path between the second antenna and the baseband including the extra attenuation (e.g., 20 dB). C1Rx is the gain/loss of the receive path between the first antenna and the baseband under regular operation (i.e., excluding the extra attenuation).


In addition, the antenna coupling is reversible, i.e., C21=C12.


In the exemplary TDD 2×2 MIMO system, the UE may perform channel estimation and obtain the downlink channel information, {tilde over (h)}1A, {tilde over (h)}2A, {tilde over (h)}1B, and {tilde over (h)}2B, represented by Eq. (1), (2), (3), and (4), respectively. The UE may utilize the channel reciprocity to obtain the uplink MIMO transmission channels so that the UE can set up the pre-coding weights accordingly. The uplink MIMO channels, {tilde over (h)}A1, {tilde over (h)}A2, {tilde over (h)}B1, and {tilde over (h)}B2 can be expressed by the following equations Eq. (11), (12), (13), and (14):

{tilde over (h)}A1=C1Tx*hA1*CARx  (11)
{tilde over (h)}A2=C2Tx*hA2*CARx  (12)
{tilde over (h)}B1=C1Tx*hB1*CBRx  (13)
{tilde over (h)}B2=C2Tx*hB2*CBRx  (14)

Where hA1, hA2, hB1, and hB2 are the uplink MIMO channels from UE Tx antennas to the receive antennas of the base station. These over the air channels are reversible, i.e., h1A=hA1, h2A=hA2, h1B=hB1, and h2B=hB2.


On the uplink MIMO transmission, there is a correction factor between the Tx antennas of the UE, due to the difference between the Tx/Rx paths of the UE antennas/radios. These correction factors may be derived from the calibration. In the exemplary 2×2 MIMO configuration, the correction factor between the first and second Tx antenna may be explicitly obtained. Staring with Eq. (11) and (12), that represent the channels from the first and second Tx antennas of the UE to the receive antenna A at base station, this can be expressed by:

{tilde over (h)}A1/{tilde over (h)}A2=(C1Tx*hA1)/(C2Tx*hA2)  (15)

Similarly, from Eq. (1) and (2), we may obtain:

{tilde over (h)}1A/{tilde over (h)}2A=(C1Rx*h1A)/(C2Rx*h2A)  (16)

The on the air channels are reversible (hA1=h1A, hA2=h2A). From Eq. (15) and (16), the ratio of the uplink MIMO channels for the two transmit antennas may be represented in Eq. (17),

{tilde over (h)}A1/{tilde over (h)}A2=({tilde over (h)}1A/{tilde over (h)}2A)*(C1Tx*C2Rx)/(C2Tx*C1Rx)=({tilde over (h)}1A/{tilde over (h)}2A)*ρ12  (17)

Note that {tilde over (h)}1A and {tilde over (h)}2A may be obtained from UE's channel estimation, and the correction factor ρ12=(C1Tx*C2Rx)/(C2Tx*C1Rx) in which C1Tx, C2Rx, C2Tx, and C1Rx may be obtained from the invented 3-step calibrations. Similarly, using Eq. (3), (4), (13), and (14), the other two channels to the receive antennas B at the base station may be shown with the same correction factor, i.e.:

{tilde over (h)}B1/{tilde over (h)}B2=({tilde over (h)}1B/{tilde over (h)}2B)*(C1Tx*C2Rx)/(C2Tx*C1Rx)=({tilde over (h)}1B/{tilde over (h)}2B)*ρ12  (18)

Equations (17) and (18) show that the uplink channel may be obtained from the downlink channel estimation and the correction factor, ρ12, which is the weight (amplitude and phase) ratio of antenna 1 to antenna 2.


Furthermore, from Equation (5), (6), and (7), the following formula may be obtained:

C1Tx*C2Rx=(Ra21*Rc21)/(Rb21*Sc*C21)  (19)

Similarly, the following may be obtained from Eq. (8), (9), and (10):

C2Tx*C1Rx=(Ra12*Rc12)/(Rb12*Sc*C12)  (20)

Coupling between the antennas are reversible (i.e., C21=C12).


The correction factor for the channel reciprocity, ρ12, may then be obtained from the 3-step self-calibration measurement,

ρ12=(Ra21*Rc21*Rb12)/(Rb21*Ra12*Rc12)  (21)


According to another embodiment of this invention a TDD communication device (either a UE or a base station) may routinely perform this self-calibration to obtain the most current correction factor for the channel reciprocity to reflect the most current operating conditions present during TDD MIMO operation. The components, like Power Amplifiers (PA), filters, etc. present in the device's Tx and Rx paths may vary with temperature or time (aging). Hence, routinely self-calibrating may update the correction factor for channel reciprocity. FIG. 6 outlines the steps used by the routine self-calibration procedure. Element 610 shows the first configuration and the first step (a) of the 3-step self-calibration. In this step, the calibration signal is set to the regular MIMO signal strength and drives the power amplifier at high power (gain) mode. The receive path includes an extra attenuation to prevent a low noise amplifier from saturating. The received calibration signal is recoded as Rak1 (for Step a, Transmitter 1, Receiver k). Element 620 shows the second configuration and the second step (b) of the 3-step self-calibration procedure. On this step, the calibration signal is digitally attenuated (e.g., by 20 dB) and drives the power amplifier at low power (gain) mode. The receive path retains the extra attenuation. The received calibration signal is recoded as Rbk1. Element 630 shows the third configuration and the third step (c) of the 3-step self-calibration procedure. In this step, the calibration signal is digitally attenuated (e.g., by 20 dB) and drives the power amplifier at low power (gain) mode. The receive path does not consist of any extra attenuation and operates for regular MIMO operation. The received calibration signal is recoded as Rck1. Element 640 checks to see if both Tx and Rx paths of the two ant./radios under calibration are calibrated. If not, element 650 shows the transmitter and receiver roles being reversed for the two antennas/radios under calibration and can then go to 610 to repeat the 3-step calibration. If both the Tx and Rx paths are calibrated, procedural step described by element 660 then checks if any other antenna/radio in the device is not calibrated. Element 670 selects one of the un-calibrated antenna/radio to pair with the first calibrated antenna/radio and will then go to procedural step 610 to start the 3-step calibration. If all the antennas/radios needed for MIMO operation in the device are calibrated, the self-calibration is complete. The correction factors for the channel reciprocity may be calculated and updated for future use when needed. Element 680 shows that a timer or that a threshold of a pre-defined condition (e.g., temperature) may be pre-set for repeating the self-calibration procedure to obtain an update on the correction factors.


In the above description, an embodiment is an example or implementation of the inventions. The various appearances of “one embodiment,” “an embodiment” or “some embodiments” do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiments.


Although various features of the invention may be described in the context of a single embodiment, the features may also be provided separately or in any suitable combination. Conversely, although the invention may be described herein in the context of separate embodiments for clarity, the invention may also be implemented in a single embodiment.


Reference in the specification to “some embodiments”, “an embodiment”, “one embodiment” or “other embodiments” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least some embodiments, but not necessarily all embodiments, of the inventions. It will further be recognized that the aspects of the invention described hereinabove may be combined or otherwise coexist in embodiments of the invention.


It is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is not to be construed as limiting and are for descriptive purpose only.


The principles and uses of the teachings of the present invention may be better understood with reference to the accompanying description, figures and examples.


It is to be understood that the details set forth herein do not construe a limitation to an application of the invention.


Furthermore, it is to be understood that the invention can be carried out or practiced in various ways and that the invention can be implemented in embodiments other than the ones outlined in the description above.


It is to be understood that the terms “including”, “comprising”, “consisting” and grammatical variants thereof do not preclude the addition of one or more components, features, steps, or integers or groups thereof and that the terms are to be construed as specifying components, features, steps or integers.


If the specification or claims refer to “an additional” element, that does not preclude there being more than one of the additional element.


It is to be understood that where the claims or specification refer to “a” or “an” element, such reference is not be construed that there is only one of that element.


It is to be understood that where the specification states that a component, feature, structure, or characteristic “may”, “might”, “can” or “could” be included, that particular component, feature, structure, or characteristic is not required to be included.


Where applicable, although state diagrams, flow diagrams or both may be used to describe embodiments, the invention is not limited to those diagrams or to the corresponding descriptions. For example, flow need not move through each illustrated box or state, or in exactly the same order as illustrated and described.


The term “method” may refer to manners, means, techniques and procedures for accomplishing a given task including, but not limited to, those manners, means, techniques and procedures either known to, or readily developed from known manners, means, techniques and procedures by practitioners of the art to which the invention belongs.


The descriptions, examples, methods and materials presented in the claims and the specification are not to be construed as limiting but rather as illustrative only.


Meanings of technical and scientific terms used herein are to be commonly understood as by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention belongs, unless otherwise defined.


The present invention may be implemented in the testing or practice with methods and materials equivalent or similar to those described herein.


While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as exemplifications of some of the preferred embodiments. Other possible variations, modifications, and applications are also within the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A communication device having a receive path comprising: a number M antennas and respective radio modules, wherein the M antennas and respective radio modules support N×N multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) transmissions and receptions, wherein M≧N;a processor operable in a baseband domain and configured to perform a self-calibration procedure by which a correction factor is computed for a channel reciprocity level, determined by said self-calibration procedure;a plurality of switches and receive paths in each one of said radio modules, said switches configured to select a receive path for regular MIMO operation or a plurality of receive paths during said self-calibration procedure, wherein at least one of said plurality of receive paths includes a path loss element between the respective antenna and a low noise amplifier (LNA); anda digital attenuator configured to adjust calibration signals in the baseband domain, wherein the M antennas are configured to alternate transmitting and receiving periods on a single channel according to a time division duplex (TDD) communication protocol, wherein the M antennas are configured to define phases employed in MIMO transmission and selected using information measured at the communication device during the receiving periods based on the channel reciprocity level,wherein the digital attenuator is further configured to digitally attenuate the calibration signals by an amount that is sufficient to prevent the LNA in one of the plurality of receive paths that is undergoing calibration from saturating,wherein the communication device is further operable to perform the self-calibration procedure in which a first antenna/radio pair (i and j), (i) acts as a transmitter and the other antenna/radio (j) acts as the receiver during the self-calibration procedure, the self-calibration procedure comprising: performing the following for each of the two antennas/radios (i and j): emitting a first calibration signal with a signal strength equivalent to a signal strength used during regular MIMO operation, the receiver using the receive path with the path loss element to prevent the LNA from saturation and recording a received calibration signal Ra—ji;transmitting a second calibration signal that is digitally attenuated, the receiver continually employing the same one receive path used in said emitting step and recording a received calibration signal Rb—ji;transmitting a third calibration signal that is digitally attenuated, the receiver switch selecting the receive path used for regular MIMO operation and recording a received calibration signal Rc—ji; andreversing roles of transmitter and receiver for the two antennas/radios (i and j) to repeat said self-calibration procedure and recording the measured calibrated signals: Ra—ij, Rb—ij, and Rc—ij.
  • 2. The communication device of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to perform the self-calibration procedure, in order to adjust for the differences in the transmit path and receive path for all the antenna/radios used in MIMO operation, wherein the correction factor is expressed by ρij, which is the weight ratio of antenna i to antenna j for the channel reciprocity level.
  • 3. The communication device of claim 1, further operable to compute the correction factor for the channel reciprocity level by: performing the following for a calibrated antenna/radio and an un-calibrated antenna/radio pair: selecting the calibrated and the un-calibrated antenna/radio pair to perform the self-calibration procedure after completing the self-calibration for the first antenna/radio pair; andrepeating the self-calibration procedure until all the antennas/radios to be used for MIMO operations are calibrated.
  • 4. The communication device of claim 3, further operable to compute the correction factor for the channel reciprocity level by: determining the correction factor for the channel reciprocity level obtained with calibration data for the antennas/radios i and j, wherein said correction factor is expressed by ρij=(Ra—ji*Rc—ji*Rb—ij)/(Rb—ji*Ra—ij*Rc—ij).
  • 5. The communication device of claim 1, further comprising: a timer operable to be preset using said processor to repeat the self-calibration procedure for all the antennas/radios used for MIMO operation by recomputing and updating the correction factors for the channel reciprocity level.
  • 6. The communication device of claim 1, further operable to recompute said correction factor for the channel reciprocity level based on a threshold of a changing condition by: presetting said processor or other baseband logic to recompute and update the correction factor for the channel reciprocity level when said threshold is met; andrepeating the self-calibration procedure for all the antennas/radios to be used for MIMO operation.
  • 7. A method comprising: deploying a number M antennas and respective radio modules, wherein the M antennas and respective radio modules support N×N multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) transmissions and receptions, wherein M≧N;using a processor to perform a self-calibration procedure;selecting, from a plurality of receive paths using at least one of a plurality of switches in each radio module, a receive path for regular MIMO operation or a plurality of receive paths during said self-calibration method, and wherein a path loss element is included in at least one receive path between the respective antenna and a low noise amplifier (LNA);adjusting calibration signals in the baseband domain using a digital attenuator, to compute a correction factor for a channel reciprocity level in a communication device;alternatively transmitting and receiving with an antenna set for alternating periods on a single channel according to a TDD communication protocol;defining phases employed in MIMO transmissions for selecting said antenna set based on information measured at the communication device during the receiving periods and the channel reciprocity level;digitally attenuating the calibration signals by an amount that is sufficient to prevent the LNA in one of the paths that is undergoing calibration from saturating; andperforming the self-calibration procedure on a first antenna/radio pair in which a first antenna/radio pair (i and j), (i) acts as a transmitter and the other antenna/radio (j) acts as the receiver during the self-calibration procedure, the self-calibration procedure comprising: performing the following for each of the two antennas/radios (i and j): emitting a first calibration signal with a signal strength equivalent to a signal strength used during regular MIMO operation, the receiver using the receive path with the path loss element to prevent the LNA from saturation and recording a received calibration signal Ra—ji;transmitting a second calibration signal that is digitally attenuated, the receiver continually employing the same one receive path used in said emitting step and recording a received calibration signal Rb—ji;transmitting a third calibration signal that is digitally attenuated, the receiver switch selecting the receive path used for regular MIMO operation and recording a received calibration signal Rc—ji; andreversing roles of transmitter and receiver for the two antennas/radios (i and j) to repeat said self-calibration procedure and recording the measured calibrated signals: Ra—ij, Rb—ij, and Rc—ij.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising: performing a self-calibration procedure with a processor or other baseband logic to adjust for the differences in the transmit path and receive path accounting for all the antenna/radios used in MIMO operation, wherein the correction factor is expressed by ρij, which is the weight ratio of antenna i to antenna j for the channel reciprocity level.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein computing the correction factor for the channel reciprocity level further comprises: performing the following for a calibrated antenna/radio and an un-calibrated antenna/radio pair: selecting the calibrated and the un-calibrated antenna/radio pair to perform the self-calibration procedure after completing the self-calibration for the first pair; andrepeating the self-calibration procedure until all the antennas/radios to be used for MIMO operations are calibrated.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, wherein computing the correction factor for the channel reciprocity level further comprises: determining the correction factor for the channel reciprocity level obtained with calibration data for the antennas/radios i and j, wherein said correction factor is expressed by ρij=(Ra_ji*Rc_ji*Rb_ij)/(Rb_ji*Ra_ij*Rc_ij).
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein performing the self-calibration procedure further comprises: presetting a timer using a processor or other baseband logic to repeat the self-calibration procedure for all the antennas/radios to be used for MIMO operation by recomputing and updating the correction factors for the channel reciprocity level.
  • 12. The method of claim 7, wherein performing the self-calibration procedure is based on meeting a predefined threshold of a changing condition by: presetting a processor or other baseband logic to recompute and update the correction factor for the channel reciprocity level when said threshold is met; and
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/109,904, filed on Dec. 17, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/906,157, filed on Nov. 19, 2013, all of which are incorporated in their entirety herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (347)
Number Name Date Kind
4044359 Applebaum et al. Aug 1977 A
4079318 Kinoshita Mar 1978 A
4359738 Lewis Nov 1982 A
4540985 Clancy et al. Sep 1985 A
4628320 Downie Dec 1986 A
5162805 Cantrell Nov 1992 A
5363104 Richmond Nov 1994 A
5444762 Frey et al. Aug 1995 A
5732075 Tangemann et al. Mar 1998 A
5915215 Williams et al. Jun 1999 A
5936577 Shoki et al. Aug 1999 A
5940033 Locher et al. Aug 1999 A
6018317 Dogan et al. Jan 2000 A
6026081 Hamabe Feb 2000 A
6046655 Cipolla Apr 2000 A
6094165 Smith Jul 2000 A
6101399 Raleigh et al. Aug 2000 A
6163695 Takemura Dec 2000 A
6167286 Ward et al. Dec 2000 A
6215812 Young et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226507 Ramesh et al. May 2001 B1
6230123 Mekuria et al. May 2001 B1
6259683 Sekine et al. Jul 2001 B1
6297772 Lewis Oct 2001 B1
6321077 Saitoh et al. Nov 2001 B1
6335953 Sanderford et al. Jan 2002 B1
6370378 Yahagi Apr 2002 B1
6377783 Lo et al. Apr 2002 B1
6393282 Iimori May 2002 B1
6584115 Suzuki Jun 2003 B1
6647276 Kuwahara et al. Nov 2003 B1
6697622 Ishikawa et al. Feb 2004 B1
6697633 Dogan et al. Feb 2004 B1
6735182 Nishimori et al. May 2004 B1
6834073 Miller et al. Dec 2004 B1
6842460 Olkkonen et al. Jan 2005 B1
6914890 Tobita et al. Jul 2005 B1
6927646 Niemi Aug 2005 B2
6934541 Miyatani Aug 2005 B2
6975582 Karabinis et al. Dec 2005 B1
6987958 Lo et al. Jan 2006 B1
7068628 Li et al. Jun 2006 B2
7154960 Liu et al. Dec 2006 B2
7177663 Axness et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190964 Damnjanovic et al. Mar 2007 B2
7257425 Wang et al. Aug 2007 B2
7299072 Ninomiya Nov 2007 B2
7391757 Haddad et al. Jun 2008 B2
7392015 Farlow et al. Jun 2008 B1
7474676 Tao et al. Jan 2009 B2
7499109 Kim et al. Mar 2009 B2
7512083 Li Mar 2009 B2
7606528 Mesecher Oct 2009 B2
7634015 Waxman Dec 2009 B2
7646744 Li Jan 2010 B2
7719993 Li et al. May 2010 B2
7742000 Mohamadi Jun 2010 B2
7769107 Sandhu et al. Aug 2010 B2
7876848 Han et al. Jan 2011 B2
7881401 Kraut et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898478 Niu et al. Mar 2011 B2
7904086 Kundu et al. Mar 2011 B2
7904106 Han et al. Mar 2011 B2
7933255 Li Apr 2011 B2
7970366 Arita et al. Jun 2011 B2
8078109 Mulcay Dec 2011 B1
8103284 Mueckenheim et al. Jan 2012 B2
8111782 Kim et al. Feb 2012 B2
8115679 Falk Feb 2012 B2
8155613 Kent et al. Apr 2012 B2
8194602 van Rensburg et al. Jun 2012 B2
8275377 Nanda et al. Sep 2012 B2
8280443 Tao et al. Oct 2012 B2
8294625 Kittinger et al. Oct 2012 B2
8306012 Lindoff et al. Nov 2012 B2
8315671 Kuwahara et al. Nov 2012 B2
8369436 Stirling-Gallacher Feb 2013 B2
8504098 Khojastepour Aug 2013 B2
8509190 Rofougaran Aug 2013 B2
8520657 Rofougaran Aug 2013 B2
8526886 Wu et al. Sep 2013 B2
8571127 Jiang et al. Oct 2013 B2
8588844 Shpak Nov 2013 B2
8599955 Kludt et al. Dec 2013 B1
8599979 Farag et al. Dec 2013 B2
8605658 Fujimoto Dec 2013 B2
8611288 Zhang et al. Dec 2013 B1
8644413 Harel et al. Feb 2014 B2
8649458 Kludt et al. Feb 2014 B2
8666319 Kloper et al. Mar 2014 B2
8670504 Naguib Mar 2014 B2
8744511 Jones et al. Jun 2014 B2
8754810 Guo et al. Jun 2014 B2
8767862 Abreu et al. Jul 2014 B2
8780743 Sombrutzki et al. Jul 2014 B2
8797969 Harel et al. Aug 2014 B1
8891598 Wang et al. Nov 2014 B1
8928528 Harel et al. Jan 2015 B2
8942134 Kludt et al. Jan 2015 B1
8976845 O'Keeffe et al. Mar 2015 B2
8983548 Harel et al. Mar 2015 B2
9014066 Wang et al. Apr 2015 B1
9035828 O'Keeffe et al. May 2015 B2
20010029326 Diab et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010038665 Baltersee et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020024975 Hendler Feb 2002 A1
20020051430 Kasami et al. May 2002 A1
20020065107 Harel et al. May 2002 A1
20020085643 Kitchener et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107013 Fitzgerald Aug 2002 A1
20020115474 Yoshino et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020181426 Sherman Dec 2002 A1
20020181437 Ohkubo et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030087645 Kim et al. May 2003 A1
20030114162 Chheda et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030153322 Burke et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030153360 Burke et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030186653 Mohebbi et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030203717 Chuprun et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030203743 Sugar et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040023693 Okawa et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040056795 Ericson et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040063455 Eran et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081144 Martin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040121810 Goransson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040125899 Li et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040125900 Liu et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040142696 Saunders et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147266 Hwang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040156399 Eran Aug 2004 A1
20040166902 Castellano et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040198292 Smith et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040228388 Salmenkaita Nov 2004 A1
20040235527 Reudink et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040264504 Jin Dec 2004 A1
20050068230 Munoz et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050068918 Mantravadi et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075140 Famolari Apr 2005 A1
20050085266 Narita Apr 2005 A1
20050129155 Hoshino Jun 2005 A1
20050147023 Stephens et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050163097 Do et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050245224 Kurioka Nov 2005 A1
20050250544 Grant et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050254513 Cave et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050265436 Suh et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050286440 Strutt et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050287962 Mehta et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060041676 Sherman Feb 2006 A1
20060092889 Lyons et al. May 2006 A1
20060094372 Ahn et al. May 2006 A1
20060098605 Li May 2006 A1
20060111149 Chitrapu et al. May 2006 A1
20060135097 Wang et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060183503 Goldberg Aug 2006 A1
20060203850 Johnson et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060227854 McCloud et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060264184 Li et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060270343 Cha et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271969 Takizawa et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060285507 Kinder et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070041398 Benveniste Feb 2007 A1
20070058581 Benveniste Mar 2007 A1
20070076675 Chen Apr 2007 A1
20070093261 Hou et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070097918 Cai et al. May 2007 A1
20070115882 Wentink May 2007 A1
20070115914 Ohkubo et al. May 2007 A1
20070152903 Lin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070217352 Kwon Sep 2007 A1
20070223380 Gilbert et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070223525 Shah et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070249386 Bennett Oct 2007 A1
20070298742 Ketchum et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080043867 Blanz et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051037 Molnar et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080081671 Wang et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080095163 Chen et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080108352 Montemurro et al. May 2008 A1
20080125120 Gallagher et al. May 2008 A1
20080144737 Naguib Jun 2008 A1
20080165732 Kim et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080238808 Arita et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080240314 Gaal et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247370 Gu et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080267142 Mushkin et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080280571 Rofougaran et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080285637 Liu et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090003299 Cave et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090028225 Runyon et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090046638 Rappaport et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090058724 Xia et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090121935 Xia et al. May 2009 A1
20090137206 Sherman et al. May 2009 A1
20090154419 Yoshida et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090187661 Sherman Jul 2009 A1
20090190541 Abedi Jul 2009 A1
20090227255 Thakare Sep 2009 A1
20090239486 Sugar et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090268616 Hosomi Oct 2009 A1
20090279478 Nagaraj et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090285331 Sugar et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090322610 Hants et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090322613 Bala et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090323608 Adachi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100002656 Ji et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100037111 Ziaja et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100040369 Zhao et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100067473 Cave et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100087227 Francos et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111039 Kim et al. May 2010 A1
20100117890 Vook et al. May 2010 A1
20100135420 Xu et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100150013 Hara et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100172429 Nagahama et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100195560 Nozaki et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100195601 Zhang Aug 2010 A1
20100208712 Wax et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100222011 Behzad Sep 2010 A1
20100232355 Richeson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100234071 Shabtay et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100278063 Kim et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100283692 Achour et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100285752 Lakshmanan et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100291931 Suemitsu et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100303170 Zhu et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100316043 Doi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110019639 Karaoguz et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110032849 Yeung et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110032972 Wang et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110085465 Lindoff et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110085532 Scherzer et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110105036 Rao et al. May 2011 A1
20110116489 Grandhi May 2011 A1
20110134816 Liu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110150050 Trigui et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110150066 Fujimoto Jun 2011 A1
20110151826 Miller et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110163913 Cohen et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110205883 Mihota Aug 2011 A1
20110205998 Hart et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110228742 Honkasalo et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110249576 Chrisikos et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110250884 Brunel et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110273977 Shapira et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110281541 Borremans Nov 2011 A1
20110299437 Mikhemar et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110310827 Srinivasa et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110310853 Yin et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120014377 Joergensen et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120015603 Proctor et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120020396 Hohne et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120027000 Wentink Feb 2012 A1
20120028638 Mueck et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120028655 Mueck et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120028671 Niu et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120033761 Guo et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120034952 Lo et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120045003 Li et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120051287 Merlin et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120064838 Miao et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120069828 Taki et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120076028 Ko et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120076229 Brobston et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120088512 Yamada et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120092217 Hosoya et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120100802 Mohebbi Apr 2012 A1
20120115523 Shpak May 2012 A1
20120155349 Bajic et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120155397 Shaffer et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120163257 Kim et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120163302 Takano Jun 2012 A1
20120170453 Tiwari Jul 2012 A1
20120170672 Sondur Jul 2012 A1
20120201153 Bharadia et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120201173 Jain et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120207256 Farag et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120212372 Petersson et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120213065 Koo et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120218962 Kishiyama et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220331 Luo et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120230380 Keusgen et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120251031 Suarez et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120270531 Wright et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120270544 Shah Oct 2012 A1
20120281598 Struhsaker et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120314570 Forenza et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120321015 Hansen et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120327870 Grandhi et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130010623 Golitschek Jan 2013 A1
20130012134 Jin et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130017794 Kloper et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130023225 Weber Jan 2013 A1
20130044877 Liu et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130051283 Lee et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130058239 Wang et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130070741 Li et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079048 Cai et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130094437 Bhattacharya Apr 2013 A1
20130094621 Luo et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130095780 Prazan et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130101073 Zai et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130150012 Chhabra et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130156016 Debnath et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130156120 Josiam et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130170388 Ito et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130172029 Chang et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130188541 Fischer Jul 2013 A1
20130190006 Kazmi et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130208587 Bala et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130208619 Kudo et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130223400 Seo et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130229996 Wang et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130229999 Da Silva et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130235720 Wang et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130242853 Seo et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130242899 Lysejko et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130242965 Horn et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130242976 Katayama et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130252621 Dimou et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130272437 Eidson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130301551 Ghosh et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130304962 Yin et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130331136 Yang et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130343369 Yamaura Dec 2013 A1
20140010089 Cai et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140010211 Asterjadhi et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140029433 Wentink Jan 2014 A1
20140071873 Wang et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140079016 Dai et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140086077 Safavi Mar 2014 A1
20140086081 Mack et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140098681 Stager et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140119288 Zhu et al. May 2014 A1
20140185501 Park et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140185535 Park et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140192820 Azizi et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140204821 Seok et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140241182 Smadi Aug 2014 A1
20140242914 Monroe Aug 2014 A1
20140269409 Dimou et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140307653 Liu et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150016438 Harel et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150030094 Zhang Jan 2015 A1
20150085777 Seok Mar 2015 A1
20150124634 Harel et al. May 2015 A1
20150139212 Wang et al. May 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
1 189 303 Mar 2002 EP
1 867 177 May 2010 EP
2 234 355 Sep 2010 EP
2 498 462 Sep 2012 EP
2009-182441 Aug 2009 JP
2009-278444 Nov 2009 JP
WO 03047033 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03073645 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2010085854 Aug 2010 WO
WO 2011060058 May 2011 WO
WO 2013192112 Dec 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (136)
Entry
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,146 dated Jan. 22, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,146 dated Mar. 27, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,159 dated Apr. 16, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,191 dated May 2, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,188 dated May 15, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,204 dated May 21, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,255 dated Jun. 6, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,068 dated Jun. 11, 2013.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,159 dated Jun. 20, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,886 dated Jul. 17, 2013.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,191 dated Jul. 19, 2013.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,146 dated Jul. 31, 2013.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,188 dated Aug. 19, 2013.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,255 dated Sep. 17, 2013.
Ahmadi-Shokouh et al., “Pre-LNA Smart Soft Antenna Selection for MIMO Spatial Multiplexing/Diversity System when Amplifier/Sky Noise Dominates”, European Transactions on Telecommunications, Wiley & Sons, Chichester, GB, vol. 21, No. 7, Nov. 1, 2010, pp. 663-677.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,150 dated Sep. 25, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,320 dated Oct. 15, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,204 dated Oct. 23, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,454 dated Oct. 28, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,194 dated Oct. 30, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,190 dated Nov. 5, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,068 dated Nov. 5, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/010,771 dated Dec. 17, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,182 dated Dec. 17, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,863 dated Dec. 17, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/011,521 dated Dec. 23, 2013.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,886 dated Jan. 7, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/018,965 dated Jan. 13, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/858,302 dated Jan. 16, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,020 dated Jan. 16, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,539 dated Jan. 27, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,376 dated Jan. 29, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,204 dated Jan. 31, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/094,644 dated Feb. 6, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,320 dated Feb. 21, 2014.
Huang et al., “Antenna Mismatch and Calibration Problem in Coordinated Multi-point Transmission System,” IET Communications, 2012, vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 289-299.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/109,904 dated Feb. 27, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,454 dated Mar. 7, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,500 dated Mar. 26, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,182 dated Mar. 25, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,863 dated Mar. 25, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/010,771 dated Apr. 4, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,352 dated Apr. 7, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,150 dated Apr. 9, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,194 dated Apr. 9, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,765 dated Apr. 22, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,376 dated May 9, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,580 dated May 9, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,068 dated May 13, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,190 dated May 20, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,252 dated Jun. 18, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/094,644 dated Jun. 24, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,539 dated Jun. 24, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/011,521 dated Jul. 1, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/109,904 dated Jul. 2, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,150 dated Jul. 8, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/250,767 dated Jul. 10, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,352 dated Jul. 23, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,190 dated Jul. 25, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,280 dated Jul. 29, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,020 dated Jul. 31, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/010,771 dated Aug. 6, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/306,458 dated Aug. 13, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,898 dated Aug. 15, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,252 dated Aug. 27, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/181,844 dated Aug. 29, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/296,209 dated Sep. 4, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,765 dated Sep. 8, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,580 dated Sep. 8, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,155 dated Sep. 12, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,640 dated Oct. 6, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/449,431 dated Oct. 10, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,736 dated Oct. 16, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/011,521 dated Oct. 20, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,920 dated Oct. 23, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,150 dated Nov. 10, 2014.
Zetterberg, “Experimental Investigation of TDD Reciprocity-Based Zero-Forcing Transmit Precoding”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, (2011), vol. 2011, Article ID 137541, pp. 1-10.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,886 dated Nov. 17, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,280 dated Nov. 18, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/480,920 dated Nov. 18, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,319 dated Nov. 19, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,866 dated Nov. 28, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,020 dated Dec. 1, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/888,057 dated Dec. 3, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,898 dated Dec. 5, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/281,358 dated Dec. 16, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/250,767 dated Dec. 26, 2014.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,765 dated Dec. 31, 2014.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/181,844 dated Jan. 5, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/306,458 dated Jan. 9, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US14/65958 dated Jan. 13, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,155 dated Jan. 26, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/296,209 dated Jan. 27, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2014/064346 dated Jan. 29, 2015.
Mitsubishi Electric, “Discussion on Antenna Calibration in TDD”, 3GPP Draft; R1-090043, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, no. Ljubljana; Jan. 7, 2009, pp. 1-4.
Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell et al., “Antenna Array Calibration for TDD CoMP”, 3GPP Draft; R1-100427, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, vol. RAN WG1, no. Valencia, Spain; Jan. 12, 2010, pp. 1-5.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,454 dated Feb. 3, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,640 dated Feb. 3, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2014/064185 dated Feb. 5, 2015.
Kai Yang et al., “Coordinated Dual-Layer Beamforming for Public Safety Network: Architecture and Algorithms”, Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, Jun. 10, 2012, pp. 4095-4099.
Songtao et al., “A Distributed Adaptive GSC Beamformer over Coordinated Antenna Arrays Network for Interference Mitigation”, Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Conference Record, IEEE Computer Society, US, Nov. 4, 2012, pp. 237-242.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2014/065635 dated Feb. 13, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,736 mailed Feb. 20, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,920 dated Feb. 23, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,886 dated Mar. 23, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/449,431 dated Mar. 23, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,866 dated Mar. 25, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/517,114 dated Apr. 6, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,454 dated Apr. 14, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,625 dated Apr. 28, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/250,767 dated Apr. 29, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/181,844 dated May 13, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,886 dated May 26, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,920 dated May 29, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,319 dated Jun. 12, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/505,655 dated Jun. 17, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/472,759 dated Jun. 18, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,020 dated Jun. 19, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/480,920 dated Jun. 22, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2014/062116 dated Jun. 22, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/467,415 dated Jun. 30, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2014/063304 dated Jul. 8, 2015.
Bandyopadhyay, S. et al., “An Adaptive MAC Protocol for Wireless Ad Hoc Community Network (WACNet) Using Electronically Steerable Passive Array Radiator Antenna”, Globecom '01 : IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference; San Antonio, Texas, USA, Nov. 25-29, 2001, IEEE Operations Center, Piscataway, NJ, vol. 5, Nov. 25, 2001, pp. 2896-2900.
Du, Yongjiu et al., “iBeam: Intelligent Client-Side Multi-User Beamforming in Wireless Networks”, IEEE INFOCOM 2014—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, IEEE, Apr. 27, 2014, pp. 817-825.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/888,057 dated Jul. 9, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,640 dated Jul. 16, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,625 dated Sep. 10, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,920 dated Sep. 21, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/181,844 dated Sep. 25, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/472,759 dated Oct. 14, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/467,415 dated Oct. 15, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,640 dated Oct. 29, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,319 dated Nov. 3, 2015.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,986 dated Nov. 4, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,625 dated Nov. 20, 2015.
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/467,415 dated Nov. 25, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150139046 A1 May 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61906157 Nov 2013 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14109904 Dec 2013 US
Child 14543357 US