The present invention relates to the process control industry. More specifically, the present invention relates to field devices used in the process control industry which communicate using two-wire process control loops.
Field devices such as transmitters, are used in the process control industry to remotely sense a process variable. The process variable may be transmitted to a control room for use in controlling the process or for providing information about process operation to a controller. For example, information related to pressure of process fluid may be transmitted to a control room and used to control the process, such as oil refining. Another type of field device, for example, is a valve controller.
One typical prior art technique for transmitting information involves controlling the amount of current flowing through a process control loop. Current is supplied from a current source in the control room and the transmitter controls the current from its location in the field. For example, a 4 mA signal can be used to indicate a zero reading and a 20 mA signal can be used to indicate a full scale reading. More recently, transmitters have employed digital circuitry which communicates with the control room using a digital signal which is superimposed onto the analog current signal flowing through the process control loop. Some techniques send purely digital signals. One example of such a technique is the HART® communication protocol proposed by Rosemount Inc. The HART® protocol and other such protocols typically include a set of commands or instructions which can be sent to the transmitter to elicit a desired response, such as transmitter control or interrogation.
Fieldbus is a communications protocol proposed by the Fieldbus Foundation and is directed to defining a communications layer or protocol for transmitting information on a process control loop. In the Fieldbus protocol, the current flowing through the loop is not used to transmit an analog signal. Instead, all information is digitally transmitted. Further, the Fieldbus standard allows transmitters to be configured in a multi-drop configuration in which more than one transmitter is connected on the same process control loop.
The Fieldbus standard is a specification promulgated by the Fieldbus foundation. The process interface specification is defined in “The Fieldbus Foundation, Fieldbus Specification, Function Block Application Process Parts 1 and 2”, Documents FF-94-890 and FF-94-891, Revision H1 Final 2.0, Jan. 2, 1996. The Fieldbus standard is an open standard which provides communication between process I/O hardware and the Fieldbus interface through an arbitrary number of data channels, each having an arbitrary number of parameters associated therewith. A Fieldbus process interface specification (transducer block) appears as shown in Table 1:
Fieldbus interface circuitry in the transmitter reads and writes the channel data and parameters 1-N through software constants termed “function blocks” in the Fieldbus Foundation Specification.
A two-wire process transmitter for use in monitoring an industrial process includes HART® communication circuitry configured to couple to a two-wire process control loop and operate in accordance with HART® communication protocol. The HART® communication circuitry completely powers the transmitter with power received from the two-wire process control loop. Fieldbus or Profibus communication circuitry is configured to couple to the two-wire process control loop and operate in accordance with Fieldbus or Profibus communication protocol and completely power the transmitter with power received from the two-wire process control loop. A first pair of electrical terminals is adapted to couple the HART® communication circuitry to the two-wire process control loop in a first configuration, and a second pair of electrical terminals is adapted to couple the Fieldbus or Profibus communication circuitry to the two-wire process control loop in an alternative second configuration.
The present invention provides a transmitter with a multi-protocol interface in which the transmitter 12 can be coupled to loop 18 in accordance with either the HART® communication protocol or the Fieldbus communication protocol.
Feature module 40 includes a terminal block 50 having a first pair of electrical terminals 52 and a second pair of electrical terminals 54. Each pair of terminals 52 and 54 is configured to couple to the two wires from two-wire process control loop 18. Electrical terminals 52 are configured for coupling to loop 18 when loop 18 operates in accordance with the HART® protocol while electrical terminals 54 are alternately configured to couple to loop 18 when the loop is operating in accordance with the Fieldbus protocol. A slide plate 60 slides along tracks 62 and selectively covers either terminals 52 or 54 such that only one set of terminals (terminals 52 or 54) can be accessed at a time. This prevents an operator from coupling transmitter 12 to simultaneously to two process control loops.
In operation, process control loop 18 is coupled to either the electrical terminals 52 for communication in accordance with the HART® protocol or to terminals 54 for communication in accordance with the Fieldbus protocol. When connected to terminals 54, Fieldbus communication circuitry 86 receives electrical power from control loop 18 to completely power transmitter 12. Circuitry 86 communicates with circuitry 82 over local bus 84 and provides power to circuitry 82. Process variable measurements are obtained using sensor 80 and provided to Fieldbus communication circuitry over bus 84. The measured process variable or information related to the process variable can be digitally transmitted in accordance with the Fieldbus protocol by Fieldbus communication circuitry 86 through terminals 54 and over process control loop 18, Fieldbus communication circuitry 86 can provide power to and communicate with an operational local device 90. For example, local device 90 can comprise a local display to display information from the transmitter 12 such as information related to the measured process variable, configuration information, etc.
On the other hand, when process control loop is coupled to electrical terminal 52, HART® communication circuitry 82 receives power from loop 18 to completely power transmitter 12. A process variable measurement is obtained using sensor 80 and can be transmitted, either in an analog or a digital format as set forth in accordance with the HART® protocol, over process control loop 18 through electrical terminals 52. In this configuration, power is provided to the optional local device 90 over local bus 84 and through the Fieldbus communication circuitry 86. In some embodiments, circuitry in Fieldbus communication circuitry is powered by the HART® communication circuitry 82 in order to access additional functionality. HART® communication circuitry 82 can provide a local output, such as to a local display, using local device 90.
The configuration of the present invention does not require a switch to selectively couple a single pair of input terminals to either Fieldbus or HART® communication circuitry. Instead, two separate pairs of electrical connections are provided which couple either to the Fieldbus communication circuitry 86 or the HART® communication circuitry 82. This provides a simple implementation which is not susceptible to the failure of a switch. Further, as the terminals are configured such that only a single pair can be used at any one time, the likelihood of user error is reduced. This configuration is achieved using the slide plate 60 which blocks the other pair of terminals. The circuitry of the present invention can be configured as desired and the block diagram set forth in
In another embodiment, circuitry 86 comprises Profibus communication circuitry such that transmitter 12 can couple to a two-wire process control loop which operates in accordance with the Profibus communication standard.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3670310 | Bharwani et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
4554631 | Reddington | Nov 1985 | A |
4627019 | Ng | Dec 1986 | A |
4674066 | Kucera | Jun 1987 | A |
4817036 | Millett et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821180 | Gerety et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4823306 | Barbic et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4852041 | Nakano | Jul 1989 | A |
4855905 | Estrada et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4884287 | Jones et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4945473 | Holtey et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4975829 | Clarey et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5007013 | Elms | Apr 1991 | A |
5424650 | Frick | Jun 1995 | A |
5481200 | Voegele et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5573032 | Lenz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5610552 | Schlesinger et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5764891 | Warrior | Jun 1998 | A |
6377859 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6449624 | Hammack et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449715 | Krivoshein | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457367 | Behm et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484107 | Roper et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487912 | Behm et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504489 | Westfield et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510740 | Behm et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511337 | Fandrey et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
D471829 | Dennis et al. | Mar 2003 | S |
D472831 | Dennis et al. | Apr 2003 | S |
6546805 | Fandrey et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6568279 | Behm et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6571132 | Davis et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574515 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629059 | Borgeson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
20020167904 | Borgeson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030023795 | Packwood et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
196 46 219 | Dec 1997 | DE |
2 243 748 | Nov 1991 | GB |
WO 9308652 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 03013104 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040199681 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |