Patent Grant
11228208
The present disclosure generally relates to the wireless transmission of electrical energy and data. More specifically, this application relates to various embodiments which enable the transmission of wireless electrical energy by near-field magnetic coupling.
Near field magnetic coupling (NFMC) is a commonly employed technique to wirelessly transfer electrical energy. The electrical energy may be used to directly power a device, charge a battery or both.
In near field magnetic coupling (NFMC) an oscillating magnetic field generated by a transmitting antenna passes through a receiving antenna that is spaced from the transmitting antenna, thereby creating an alternating electrical current that is received by the receiving antenna.
However, the oscillating magnetic field radiates in multiple directions and at a relatively short distance from the transmitting antenna. Thus, electronic devices, such as a cellular phone, that are charged with prior art charging systems that utilize NFMC are required to be positioned directly in physical contact with the surface of the prior art transmitting base, such as a charging mat, that houses a prior art antenna. Because the electronic device is required to be in physical contact with the prior art charging base, the number of electronic devices that can be electrically charged is limited to one device. Furthermore, since the electronic device is required to be in physical contact with the prior art charging base, the device cannot be used while it is being electrically charged.
In contrast to the prior art, the present invention provides a wireless electrical power transmitting system that enables multiple electronic devices to be simultaneously electrically charged or powered. Furthermore, in contrast to the prior art, the wireless electrical power transmitting system enables multiple electronic devices to be electrically charged or powered by positioned one or more devices at a distance away from the wireless transmitting base of the present invention. Therefore, not only can multiple devices be electrically charged or powered simultaneously, they can also be utilized by a user.
The present disclosure relates to the transfer of wireless electrical energy to and from electronic devices that are configured to utilize wirelessly transmitted electrical energy. Such electronic devices may include, but are not limited to, consumer electronics, medical devices, and devices used in industrial and military applications.
In one or more embodiments, a wireless electrical power transmission system is provided comprising an electrical power transmission base and a wireless electrical power receiving antenna that is incorporatable within an electronic device. In one or more embodiments, the electrical power transmission base comprises at least one wireless electrical power transmitting antenna that is housed therewithin. In one or more embodiments the wireless electrical power transmitting antenna is configured with one or more magnetic field shielding embodiments that increase the magnitude of the magnetic field that emanates from the antenna. In one or more embodiments the wireless electrical power transmitting antenna is configured with one or more magnetic field shielding embodiments that control the direction in which the magnetic field emanates from the antenna. Furthermore, the transmitting and/or the receiving antenna is configured with one or more embodiments that increase the efficiency, reduces form factor and minimizes cost in which electrical energy and/or data is wirelessly transmitted. As a result, the present invention provides a wireless electrical energy transmission system comprising a wireless electrical energy transmitting base that enables wireless electrical charging and powering of electronic devices that are positioned at a distance from the wireless transmission base.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth by way of examples in order to provide a thorough understanding of the relevant teachings. However, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present teachings may be practiced without such details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and/or circuitry have been described at a relatively high-level, without detail, in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present teachings.
The various embodiments illustrated in the present disclosure provide for the wireless transfer of electrical energy and/or data. More specifically, the various embodiments of the present disclosure provide for the wireless transfer of electrical energy and/or data via near field magnetic coupling between a transmitting base and a receiving antenna positioned within an electronic device.
Now turning to the figures,
Since prior art wireless electrical charging devices 10 require physical contact with an electronic device 12 to enable charging or powering of the electronic device 12, the number of devices able to be simultaneously charged or powered is significantly limited. In many cases, the relatively weak signal and relatively small surface area of prior art wireless charging devices 10 limit the number of electronic devices 12 being charged or powered to one. Furthermore, requiring the electronic device 12 be in physical contact with the prior art wireless charging device 10 limits the use of the electronic device 12 while being charged. For example, in many cases, one cannot use an electronic device 12 while it is being charged by a prior art wireless charging device 10 since it is in physical contact with the charging device which thus does not allow the electronic device 12 to be held and manipulated.
As will be described in detail, the present invention in contrast to prior art wireless charging devices 10, addresses these problems by providing a wireless electrical energy transmitting system 14 comprising a wireless transmitting base 16 that allows for multiple electronic devices to be electrically charged or powered wirelessly simultaneously. Furthermore, unlike the prior art, the transmitting base 16 of the present invention allows for wireless electrical charging and/or electrical powering of at least one electronic device 12 that is positioned at a distance away from the transmitting base 16. In contrast to prior art wireless charging devices 10, the wireless electrical energy transmitting system 14 of the present invention utilizes near field magnetic coupling (NFMC) in which magnetic fields 15 (
In this application, the inventive concepts particularly pertain to near-field magnetic coupling (NFMC). NFMC enables the transfer of electrical energy and/or data wirelessly through magnetic induction between a transmitting antenna 18 and a corresponding receiving antenna 20. The NFMC standard, based on near-field communication interface and protocol modes, is defined by ISO/IEC standard 18092. Furthermore, as defined herein “inductive charging” is a wireless charging technique that utilizes an alternating electromagnetic field to transfer electrical energy between two antennas. “Resonant inductive coupling” is defined herein as the near field wireless transmission of electrical energy between two magnetically coupled coils that are tuned to resonate at a similar frequency. As defined herein, “mutual inductance” is the production of an electromotive force in a circuit by a change in current in a second circuit magnetically coupled to the first circuit.
As defined herein a “shielding material” is a material that captures a magnetic field. Examples of shielding material include, but are not limited to ferrite materials such as zinc comprising ferrite materials such as manganese-zinc, nickel-zinc, copper-zinc, magnesium-zinc, and combinations thereof. A shielding material thus may be used to direct a magnetic field to or away from an object, such as a parasitic metal, depending on the position of the shielding material within or nearby an electrical circuit. Furthermore, a shielding material can be used to modify the shape and directionality of a magnetic field. As defined herein a parasitic material, such as a parasitic metal, is a material that induces eddy current losses in the inductor antenna. This is typically characterized by a decrease in inductance and an increase in resistance of the antenna, i.e., a decrease in the quality factor. An “antenna” is defined herein as a structure that wirelessly receives or transmits electrical energy or data. An antenna comprises a resonator that may comprise an inductor coil or a structure of alternating electrical conductors and electrical insulators. Inductor coils are preferably composed of an electrically conductive material such as a wire, which may include, but is not limited to, a conductive trace, a filar, a filament, a wire, or combinations thereof.
It is noted that throughout this specification the terms, “wire”, “trace”, “filament” and “filar” may be used interchangeably. As defined herein, the word “wire” is a length of electrically conductive material that may either be of a two dimensional conductive line or track that may extend along a surface or alternatively, a wire may be of a three dimensional conductive line or track that is contactable to a surface. A wire may comprise a trace, a filar, a filament or combinations thereof. These elements may be a single element or a multitude of elements such as a multifilar element or a multifilament element. Further, the multitude of wires, traces, filars, and filaments may be woven, twisted or coiled together such as in a cable form. The wire as defined herein may comprise a bare metallic surface or alternatively, may comprise a layer of electrically insulating material, such as a dielectric material that contacts and surrounds the metallic surface of the wire. A “trace” is an electrically conductive line or track that may extend along a surface of a substrate. The trace may be of a two dimensional line that may extend along a surface or alternatively, the trace may be of a three dimensional conductive line that is contactable to a surface. A “filar” is an electrically conductive line or track that extends along a surface of a substrate. A filar may be of a two dimensional line that may extend along a surface or alternatively, the filar may be a three dimensional conductive line that is contactable to a surface. A “filament” is an electrically conductive thread or threadlike structure that is contactable to a surface. “Operating frequency” is defined as the frequency at which the receiving and transmitting antennas operate. “Self-resonating frequency” is the frequency at which the resonator of the transmitting or receiving antenna resonates.
In one or more embodiments, the wireless transmitting base 16 is a component of the wireless electrical energy transmitting system 14. The electrical energy transmitting system 14 comprises the transmitting base 16 and a receiving antenna 20 configured to receive the wirelessly transmitted electrical energy. In one or more embodiments, the wireless electrical energy transmitting system 14 may comprise at least one electronic device 12 having the receiving antenna 20 configured to receive wireless electrical energy and/or data transmitted from the base 16. In one or more embodiments, the at least one electronic device 12 acts as a receiving device that receives and conditions the wirelessly transmitted electrical energy so that it can be used to electrically power the device or store the wirelessly received electrical energy. In one or more embodiments, the at least one electronic device 12 configured to receive the wirelessly transmitted electrical energy may also comprise an electrical energy storage device (not shown) such as an electrochemical cell or battery pack configured to store the received wirelessly transmitted electrical energy.
In one or more embodiments, the wireless transmitting base 16 comprises at least one transmitting antenna 18 that is electrically connected to a transmitting electronic circuit 22 configured to condition electrical energy to be wirelessly transmitted by the transmitting antenna 18. In one or more embodiments, the at least one transmitting antenna 18 and the transmitting electronic circuit 22 reside within a housing 24 of the wireless transmitting base 16. In one or more embodiments the electronic device 12 comprises the receiving antenna 20 and a receiving electrical circuit (not shown) configured to condition the received wireless electrical energy to be used to either electrically power the electronic device 12 and/or store the wireless electrical energy within an electrical energy storage device within the electronic device 12.
In one or more embodiments, the transmitting base housing 24 comprises an enclosure having a sidewall within which the at least one transmitting antenna 18 and the transmitting electronic circuit 22 are positioned. Alternatively, the transmitting electronic circuit 22 may be positioned external of the base housing 24.
In addition, in one or more embodiments, the transmitting base 16 may be configured with at least one repeater 32 (
As shown in the embodiment, illustrated in
In one or more embodiments, the physical dimensions of the transmitter base 16 may affect electrical performance as the dimensions of the transmitting base 16 may dictate the dimensions and/or positioning of the transmitting antenna 18 therewithin. For example, given a cylindrical shaped transmitting base having a diameter, in order to wirelessly transmit electrical energy to the same location, away from the base 16, the transmitting antenna 18 therewithin must be constructed having an increased inductance in comparison to a transmitting antenna positioned within a cylindrically shaped transmitting base having a larger diameter. In one or more embodiments, the inductance of a transmitting antenna 18 constructed having a transmitting inductor coil 50 may be increased by constructing the transmitting inductor coil 50 with an increased number of coil turns. Thus, in this example, by increasing the number of coil turns of the transmitting coil 50 and/or decreasing the size of the transmitting antenna 18 such that it fits within a transmitting base 16 having a decreased diameter or volume, the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the transmitting antenna 18 generally increases due to the increased proximity effect due to the increased number of coils and reduced spacing between coil turns. Thus, as a result, the efficiency of the wireless transmission of the electrical energy and/or data from the transmitting antenna 18 decreases. Furthermore, in general, as the diameter or width 46 and depth 48 of the transmitting base 16 decreases, the distance away from the base 16 at which electrical energy and/or data can be transmitted decreases as there is a maximum inductance with which the transmitting antenna 18 can be constructed to maintain transmitting distance. Similarly, as the length 26 of the transmitting base 16 decreases the inductance of the transmitting antenna 18 should be increased to maintain wireless transmission distance. However, the extent to which the inductance of the transmitting antenna 18 can be increased is generally limited by the antenna's self-resonant frequency. Therefore, decreasing the length 26 of the wireless transmitting base 16 could reduce the wireless transmission distance if the length 26 of the base 16 is reduced more than can be compensated by increasing the inductance of the transmitting antenna 18.
In one or more embodiments the transmitting base sidewalls have a thickness 52 (
It is further noted that while the embodiment of the wireless transmitting base 16 as illustrated in
Alternatively, as shown in
As shown in the block diagram of
In one or more embodiments, the transmitting antenna 18 or repeater 32 may be positioned having a gap 84 that extends between the transmitting antenna 18 or repeater 32 and the proximal end 28 of the transmitting base 16. As defined herein, the gap 84 extends from the interior surface 54 of the bottom sidewall 34 at the proximal end 28 of the transmitting base 16 to a surface of the transmitting antenna 18 or repeater 32 that faces the transmitting base proximal end 28. In an embodiment, the gap 84 may range from about 0 cm such that the transmitting antenna 18 or repeater 32 is in physical contact with the interior surface 54 of the bottom sidewall 34 at the proximal base end 28 to about 10 cm distal of the bottom sidewall 34. Alternatively, the gap 84 may range from about 0 percent of the base length 26, such that the transmitting antenna 18 or repeater 32 is in physical contact with the interior surface 54 of the bottom sidewall 34 at the base proximal end 28 to about 90 percent of the base length 26. Furthermore, at least one transmitting antenna 18 or repeater 32 may be positioned within the transmitting base housing 24 such that the at least one transmitting antenna 18 and repeater 32 are in physical contact with the interior surface 54 of the top sidewall 36 at the base distal end 30. In one or more embodiments modifying the gap 84 typically changes the distance between the transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20. Generally, as the gap 84 increases, the range within which electrical energy is able to be transmitted is increased. For example, in an embodiment the transmitting base 16 may be constructed with a transmitting antenna 18 with a gap 84 of about 45 mm, thus the range within which electrical energy is able to be wirelessly transmitted typically extends from about 10 to about 30 mm between the transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20. In this particular example, increasing the gap 84 to about 70 mm increases the range within which electrical energy is able to be wirelessly transmitted from about 30 mm to about 60 mm between the transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20. In one or more embodiments modifying the gap 84 may change transfer impedance. As defined herein, “transfer impedance” is an electrical impedance that is created by the current flowing within spaced apart transmitting and receiving antennas. In general as the separation distance between the transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20 decrease, transfer impedance increases. Transfer impedance is defined by the following mathematical equation:
where:
In one or more embodiments as the gap 84 approaches 0 mm, coupling between the transmitting antenna 18 positioned within the housing and the receiving antenna 20, and coupling between the transmitting antenna 18 and the repeater 32, both positioned within the base housing 24, increases. It is also noted that as the gap 84 approaches 0 mm, the range within which electrical energy is able to be transmitted generally decreases because magnetic fields emanating from an antenna, such as a repeater 32 positioned about perpendicular to the transmitting antenna 18 along the bottom housing sidewall 34 is relatively close to the plane of the transmitting antenna 18. In one or more embodiments, coupling between the transmitting antenna 18 and the repeater 32 within the housing 24 of the transmitting base 16 is optimally between about 0.15 to about 0.85. In one or more embodiments, the transmitting base 16 is configured such that the coupling between the transmitting antenna 18 and the repeater 32 within the base housing 24 is enough such that magnetic fields generated by the transmitting antenna 18 are picked up and amplified by the repeater 32 so that the receiving antenna 20 can convert the received magnetic fields into electrical current and voltage. However, coupling between the transmitting antenna 18 and the repeater 32 within the transmitting base housing 24 should be of a relatively low value to maintain an acceptable transfer impedance such that the amplifier (not shown) of the receiving circuit (not shown) can operate efficiently.
In one or more embodiments, as shown in
In one or more embodiments as illustrated in
Furthermore, in one or more embodiments the wireless transmitting base 16 may be constructed so that the transmitting inductor coil 50 of the transmitting antenna 18 within the transmitting base 16 is positioned directly adjacent and facing an interior sidewall surface 54 of the transmitting base housing 24. The magnetic field shielding material 70 positioned distal the transmitting inductor coil 50 faces away from the interior sidewall surface 54 and towards the interior of the transmitting base 16. In one or more embodiments, the transmitting antenna 18 may be positioned within the housing 24 of the transmitting base 16 so that the exterior surface of the transmitting inductor coil 50 is in physical contact with the interior sidewall surface 54 of the transmitting base housing 24. This embodiment allows for increasing the magnitude of the transmitted magnetic field. Therefore, as a result, the transmission distance of the magnetic field and, thus, the wireless electric energy is increased. In one or more embodiments, the transmission distance of the magnetic field 15 may be equal to about three times the greater of the length 26, width 46, depth 48, or diameter 58 of the transmitting base 16. In one or more embodiments, the transmission distance of the magnetic field 15 may be equal to about five times the greater of the length 26, width 46, depth 48, or diameter 58 of the transmitting base 16.
In one or more embodiments, the magnetic field shielding material 70 may be a ferrite material with a loss tangent as low as possible. In one or more embodiments, the loss tangent of the ferrite material may be equal to or less than 0.70 at the antenna operating frequency. Such shielding materials may include, but are not limited to, zinc comprising ferrite materials such as manganese-zinc, nickel-zinc, copper-zinc, magnesium-zinc, and combinations thereof. These and other ferrite material formulations may be incorporated within a polymeric material matrix so as to form a flexible ferrite substrate. Examples of such materials may include but are not limited to, FFSR and FFSX series ferrite materials manufactured by Kitagawa Industries America, Inc. of San Jose, Calif. and Flux Field Directional RFIC material, manufactured by 3M™ Corporation of Minneapolis, Minn. In one or more embodiments, the transmitting antenna 18 incorporated with the shielding material 70, such as a ferrite material, should have a self-resonance frequency (SRF)>1.5 times the operating frequency, preferably an SRF>3 times the operating frequency. For example, if the operating frequency is 6.78 MHz, then the SRF of the antenna should be greater than 10 MHz.
Other desired properties of a ferrite shielding material include:
In general, ferrite or other magnetic materials may be employed for the purposes of increasing Mutual inductance between the transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20 and to magnetically insulate the metallic components (e.g., PCB, battery) of a device from the magnetic fields of the wireless electrical energy transmitting system 14.
In one or more embodiments, the magnetic field shielding material 70 may comprise a single sheet, or it may comprise a plurality of sheets of magnetic shielding material 70 having a gap positioned between the magnetic field shielding material and the inductor coil of the repeater 32, the transmitting antenna 18, or the receiving antenna 20 to reduce eddy current losses within the respective antenna. Alternatively, the magnetic field shielding material 70 may be placed flush with the inductor coil of the repeater 32, the transmitting antenna 18, or the receiving antenna 20. In one or more embodiments, the magnetic field shielding material 70 may comprise a magnetic material, a metallic material, or a combination thereof.
In one or more embodiments, the receiving antenna 20 may be shielded from surrounding electronic components within an electronic device 12 as well as from a metal enclosure or enclosures that comprise the electronic device 12. In one or more embodiments, a receiving inductor coil 86 of the receiving antenna 20 may be shielded from surrounding electronic components within an electronic device 12 as well as from a metal enclosure or enclosures that comprise the electronic device 12. The electronic components within an electronic device 12 may be shielded from magnetic fields coupling with the receiving antenna 20. For example, shielding a receiving antenna 20 from a battery (not shown) placed directly behind the receiving antenna 20 within an electronic device 12. Magnetic fields may couple with the battery thereby inducing electrical current in the battery and thus causing the battery to heat which may degrade the life of the battery. Other metallic parts of the device may need to be shielded from the antenna to prevent eddy currents from being induced within the antenna and device which cause undesirable heating.
Thus, as will described in more detail, the embodiments of magnetic field shielding disclosed herein provide shielding of the transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20 from such components as an electrochemical cell (not shown) or other electronic components such that the quality factor of the antenna is sustained. Thus, the various magnetic field shielding embodiments provide for an increased quality factor and self-resonant frequency of the transmitting or receiving antennas 18, 20. In addition, the magnetic field shielding embodiments provide for increased coupling efficiency and end to end DC to DC efficiency. Furthermore, the magnetic field shielding embodiments provide for increased power handling capability.
In one or more embodiments, the repeater 32, transmitting antenna 18 or receiving antenna 18 may comprise at least one inductor coil such as the non-limiting examples disclosed in U.S. Pat. App. Nos. 2017/0040690, 2017/0040692, 2017/0040107, 2017/0040105, 2017/0040696, and 2017/0040688 all to Peralta et al., 2017/0040691, 2017/0040694 to Singh et al., 2017/0040693 to Luzinski and 2017/0040695 to Rajagopalan et al., all of which are assigned to the assignee of the present application and incorporated fully herein. In addition, the repeater 32, the transmitting antenna 18 or the receiving antenna 20 may be configured in a multi-layer-multi-turn (MLMT) construction in which at least one insulator is positioned between a plurality of conductors. Non-limiting examples of antennas having an MLMT construction that may be incorporated with the present disclosure may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,610,530, 8,653,927, 8,680,960, 8,692,641, 8,692,642, 8,698,590, 8,698,591, 8,707,546, 8,710,948, 8,803,649, 8,823,481, 8,823,482, 8,855,786, 8,898,885, 9,208,942, 9,232,893, 9,300,046, all to Singh et al., and assigned to the assignee of the present application are incorporated fully herein. It is also noted that other antennas such as, but not limited to, an antenna configured to send and receive signals in the UHF radio wave frequency such IEEE standard 802.15.1 may be incorporated within the present disclosure.
In one or more embodiments, the inductor coils of either the repeater, the transmitting antenna 18, or the receiving antenna 20 are strategically positioned to facilitate reception and/or transmission of wirelessly transferred electrical power or data through near field magnetic induction. Antenna operating frequencies may comprise all operating frequency ranges, examples of which may include, but are not limited to, about 100 kHz to about 200 kHz (Qi interface standard), 100 kHz to about 350 kHz (PMA interface standard), 6.78 MHz (Rezence interface standard), or alternatively at an operating frequency of a proprietary operating mode. In addition, the repeater 32 the transmitting antenna 18 and/or the receiving antenna 20 of the present disclosure may be designed to transmit or receive, respectively, over a wide range of operating frequencies on the order of about 1 kHz to about 1 GHz or greater, in addition to the Qi and Rezence interfaces standards. In addition, the repeater 32, the transmitting antenna 18 and the receiving antenna 20 of the present disclosure may be configured to transmit and/or receive electrical power having a magnitude that ranges from about 100 mW to about 1,000 mW. In one or more embodiments the transmitting inductor coil 50 of the transmitting antenna 18 is configured to resonate at a transmitting antenna resonant frequency or within a transmitting antenna resonant frequency band. In one or more embodiments the transmitting antenna resonant frequency is at least 1 kHz. In one or more embodiments the transmitting antenna resonant frequency band extends from about 1 kHz to about 100 MHz. In one or more embodiments the repeater inductor coil 98 of the repeater 32 is configured to resonate at a repeater resonant frequency or within a repeater resonant frequency band. In one or more embodiments the repeater resonant frequency is at least 1 kHz. In one or more embodiments the repeater resonant frequency band extends from about 1 kHz to about 100 MHz. In one or more embodiments the receiving inductor coil 86 of the receiving antenna 20 is configured to resonate at a receiving antenna resonant frequency or within a receiving antenna resonant frequency band. In one or more embodiments the receiving antenna resonant frequency is at least 1 kHz. In one or more embodiments the receiving antenna resonant frequency band extends from about 1 kHz to about 100 MHz.
In addition, the substrate 102 is constructed of a relatively thin thickness that helps enable the flexibility of the substrate 102. In one or more embodiments, the thickness of the substrate 102 may range from about 0.01 cm to about 0.5 cm. In one or more embodiments, the flexible mechanical properties enable the transmitting antenna 100 to conform to the interior surface or surfaces within the wireless transmitting base 16. For example, the flexible transmitting antenna 100 may be positioned along a curved surface within the transmitting base 16 or may be positioned along and/or over a junction of two sidewalls of the transmitting base housing 24.
Thus, by constructing the transmitting antenna 18 having at least one of the magnetic field shielding material 70 and the conductive material 104, the emanating magnetic field is restricted from traveling into undesired areas. In one or more embodiments, constructing the transmitting antenna 18 having at least one of the magnetic field shielding material 70 and the conductive material 104, ensures that the emanating magnetic field travels in one direction, away from the magnetic field shielding material 70 and/or the conductive material 104 thereby increasing the efficiency of the transmitting antenna 18. As a result, magnetic fields and thus wireless electrical energy travel further distances before the magnitude of the magnetic fields decays to zero. As a result, the transmitting base 16 of the present invention is capable of wirelessly transmitting an increased amount of electrical energy and transmit the electrical energy further away from the base 16 thereby enabling multiple electronic devices 12 to be charged or electrically powered at distances away from the wireless transmitting base 16.
Alternatively, as illustrated in
In one or more embodiments, various electrical performance parameters of the wireless electrical energy transmitting system 14 of the present application were measured. One electrical parameter is quality factor (Q) defined below. The quality factor of a coil defined as:
Where:
Another performance parameter is resistance of receiving antenna efficiency (RCE) which is coil to coil efficiency. RCE is defined as:
Where:
Another performance parameter is mutual induction (M). “M” is the mutual inductance between two opposing inductor coils of a transmitting and receiving antenna, respectively. Mutual induction (M) is defined as:
Where:
Mutual inductance can be calculated by the following relationship:
M=k*√{square root over (LTX*LRX)}
Where:
Table I above details various measured performance parameters of an NFMC system comprising a transmitting antenna 18 and a receiving antenna 20. The transmitting antenna 18 comprising an NC-2B Airfuel certified resonant transmitting inductor coil was used in the performance testing as detailed in configurations 1-3 of Table I. The transmitting antenna 18 was configured having an inductor coil with a length of 170 mm and a width of 100 mm and 6 turns. The receiving antenna 20 comprised a receiving inductor coil 86 having 5 number of turns. The receiving inductor coil 86 was configured having a length of 55 mm and a width of 48 mm. Test configuration 1 comprised the receiving antenna 20 with the receiving inductor coil 86 positioned on a single sheet of FFSX ferrite material having a length of 55 mm and a width of 43 mm and a thickness of 0.3 mm. The receiving antenna 20 in test configuration 1 further comprised an aluminum sheet having a thickness of 0.5 mm positioned behind the ferrite shielding material. Test configuration 2 comprised the receiving antenna 20 with the receiving inductor coil 86 of configuration 1 positioned on a plurality of 4 spaced apart ferrite material panes 120. Each pane was constructed having a length of 26.5 mm, a width of 22.5 mm, and a thickness of 0.3 mm. The receiving antenna 20 was constructed such that a magnetic field shielding gap 122 of about 3.0 mm extended between each pane 120. The receiving antenna 20 in test configuration 2 further comprised an aluminum sheet having a thickness of 0.1 mm positioned behind the panes 120 of ferrite shielding material. Test configuration 3 comprised the receiving antenna 20 with the receiving inductor coil 86 of configuration 1 positioned on a plurality of 4 spaced apart ferrite material panes 120. Each pane 120 was constructed having a length of 26.5 mm, a width of 22.5 mm, and a thickness of 0.3 mm. The receiving antenna 20 was constructed having a magnetic field shielding gap 122 of about 2.0 mm extending between each pane 120 of magnetic field shielding material 70. The receiving antenna 20 in test configuration 3 further comprised an aluminum sheet having a thickness of 0.1 mm positioned behind the panes 120 of ferrite shielding material. As detailed in Table I shown above, constructing the receiving antenna 20 having a plurality of separate panes 120 of magnetic field shielding material 70 increased the quality factor, self-resonant frequency, and resonator coupling efficiency (RCE). In one or more embodiments, constructing the receiving antenna 20 having a plurality of separate panes 120 of magnetic field shielding material 70 decreases eddy current circulation within the antenna which improves electrical performance. Eddy currents are generally known in the art to cause undesirable heat and degrade the inductive properties of a coil antenna which lead to a decreased wireless power transfer efficiency. It is noted that the symbol “-” indicates that a measurement was not taken.
Table II above details various measured performance parameters of an NFMC system operating at 13.56 MHz comprising a transmitting antenna 18 and a receiving antenna 20. The transmitting antenna 18 was configured having an inductor coil with a length of 5 cm and a width of 5 cm and 4 turns. The receiving antenna 20 comprised a receiving inductor coil 86 having 4 number of turns. The receiving inductor coil 86 was configured having a length of 5 cm and a width of 5 cm. The receiving antenna 20 was positioned about 4 cm from the transmitting antenna 18. A conductive metal sheet composed of aluminum was positioned between the transmitting inductor coil 50 and a transmitting pick up loop 128 (
Test configuration 1 comprised the conductive metal sheet being positioned at about 2 cm from the transmitting inductor coil 50. Test configuration 2 comprised the conductive metal sheet positioned about 1 cm from the transmitting inductor coil 50. Test configuration 3 comprised the conductive metal sheet positioned about 0.75 mm from the transmitting inductor coil. Test configuration 4 comprised the conductive metal sheet positioned about 0.5 cm from the transmitting inductor coil 50. As detailed in Table II, test configuration 1 in which the conductive metal sheet was placed about 2 cm from the transmitting inductor coil exhibited the lowest attenuation at the receiving antenna at about 0.8 dB. Test configuration 4 in which the conductive metal sheet was placed about 0.5 cm from the transmitting coil exhibited the greatest attenuation of 13.82 dB at the pick up loop. The results detailed in Table II illustrate that the conductive metal sheet is an effective shield of magnetic fields, however incorporating the metal shield in this example reduced the Mutual inductance between the transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20. Furthermore, the results detailed in Table II illustrate how coupling efficiency is optimized by the positioning of the magnetic field shielding material 70, particularly in the embodiments shown in
Table III above details measured Mutual inductance (M) and antenna coupling coefficient (k) performance parameters of an NFMC system comprising a transmitting antenna 18 and a receiving antenna 20 at three separation distances, 3 mm, 5 mm and 7 mm. The transmitting antenna 18 comprising a transmitting inductor coil 50 supported on a substrate composed of FR4 was used in the performance testing as detailed in configurations 1-3 shown in Table III. The transmitting antenna 18 was configured having an inductor coil with a length of 60 mm and a width of 9.5 mm and 5 turns. The receiving antenna 20 comprised a receiving inductor coil 86 having 2 number of turns supported on a substrate comprising FR4. The receiving inductor coil 86 was configured having a length of 60 mm and a width of 6 mm.
Test configuration 1 comprised the receiving antenna configured with the receiving coil supported on the substrate comprising FR4. Test configuration 2 comprised the receiving antenna constructed with the receiving coil positioned directly in contact with FFSX3 ferrite material configured having the same dimensions as the receiving inductor coil 86. The ferrite material had a thickness of about 0.3 mm. Test configuration 3 comprised test configuration 2 with the addition of a sheet of copper metal positioned in contact with the ferrite material. In test configuration 3, the ferrite material was sandwiched between the receiving inductor coil and the copper metal sheet. The copper metal sheet had a thickness of about 0.1 mm.
As detailed in Table III, the addition of the ferrite material with the receiving antenna 20 improved Mutual induction in comparison to test configuration 1 comprising only the receiving inductor coil 86. In addition, as shown by the experimental results, detailed in Table III, the addition of the copper sheet generally degrades Mutual inductance.
Table IV above details the electrical performance factors of inductance, electrical resistance, and quality factor of embodiments of transmitting and receiving antennas at a measured frequency of 10 MHz in various configurations. The transmitting antenna 18 comprised a transmitting inductor coil 50 configured having a length of 5 cm, a width of 5 cm and 4 turns. The receiving antenna 20 comprised a receiving inductor coil 86 having a length of 5 cm, a width of 5 cm, and 4 number of turns.
Test configuration 1 comprised only the transmitting coil. Test configuration 2 comprised the transmitting coil in contact with the FFSX3 ferrite material. The ferrite material having a thickness of about 0.3 mm. Test configuration 3 comprised test configuration 2 with the addition of an aluminum metal sheet that was positioned in contact with the ferrite material. Test configuration 3 comprised the ferrite material positioned between the transmitting inductor coil 50 and the aluminum metal sheet. The aluminum metal sheet had a thickness of about 0.1 mm.
Test configuration 4 comprised only the receiving inductor coil 81246. Test configuration 5 comprised the receiving inductor coil 86 in contact with FFSX3 ferrite material. The ferrite material had a thickness of about 0.3 mm. Test configuration 6 comprised test configuration 5 with the addition of an aluminum metal sheet that was positioned in contact with the ferrite material. Test configuration 6 comprised the ferrite material positioned between the receiving coil and the aluminum metal sheet. The aluminum metal sheet had a thickness of about 0.1 mm.
As detailed in Table IV above, the inductance and electrical resistance of both the transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20 increased with the addition of the ferrite material. It was also observed that the inductance increased at a greater rate than the electrical resistance at the measured frequency of 10 MHz. This resulted in an increase in the quality factor when the ferrite material was added to the antenna structure. It was also observed that the addition of the copper metal sheet degraded the quality factor.
Table V above details the induced voltage in which a one-turn loop antenna comprising a length of 1.6 cm and a width of 0.9 cm positioned about 1.5 mm from the receiving inductor coil 86 was used to detect the efficiency of the shielding of the receiving antenna 20. An NFMC system comprising a transmitting antenna 18 and a receiving antenna 20 at three separation distances, 3 mm, 5 mm and 7 mm were utilized for the experiment.
The transmitting antenna 18 used in the performance testing as detailed in configurations 1-3 shown in Table V comprised a resonant transmitting inductor coil 50 supported on a substrate comprising FR4. The transmitting inductor coil 50 had a length of 5 cm and a width of 5 cm and 4 turns. The receiving antenna 20 comprised a receiving inductor coil 86 supported on a substrate comprising FR4. The receiving inductor coil was configured having a length of 5 cm, a width of 5 cm, and 4 turns.
Test configuration 1 comprised only the receiving antenna 20 comprising the receiving inductor coil 86 supported on the FR4 substrate. Test configuration 2 comprised the FR4 substrate in contact with FFSX3 ferrite material. The ferrite material having a thickness of about 0.3 mm. Test configuration 3 comprised test configuration 2 with the addition of a copper metal sheet that was positioned in contact with the ferrite material. Test configuration 3 comprised the ferrite material positioned between the receiving inductor coil 86 and the copper metal sheet. The copper metal sheet had a thickness of about 0.5 mm.
The results in Table V indicate that for about the same amount of current in a DC load, the induced voltage in the loop dropped about 19% by adding the ferrite to the receiving coil, and dropped about 56% when the copper metal sheet and ferrite were added to the receiving coil. It is noted that the symbol “-” indicates that a measurement was not taken.
Table VI above details the inductance, electrical resistance and quality factor measurements of embodiments of a receiving antenna 20 that was electrically connected to a cellular phone. The transmitting antenna 18 comprised a transmitting inductor coil 50 configured having a length of 60 mm, a width of 9.5 mm and 5 turns. The receiving antenna 20 comprised a receiving inductor coil 86 having a length of 60 mm cm, a width of 6 mm, and 2 number of turns.
Test configuration 1 comprised the receiving coil in contact with FFSX ferrite material. The ferrite material having a thickness of about 0.3 mm. Test configuration 2 comprised test configuration 2 with the addition of an aluminum metal sheet that was positioned in contact with the ferrite material. Test configuration 2 comprised the ferrite material positioned between the receiving coil and the copper metal sheet. The aluminum metal sheet had a thickness of about 0.1 mm.
It was observed that adding the cellular phone to the receiving inductor coil 86 and ferrite configuration degraded the quality factor by about 10 percent. In addition, adding the cellular phone to the receiving coil 86, ferrite and copper metal sheet configuration degraded the quality factor by about 6 percent.
It is noted that in one or more embodiments, a high inductance inductor coil may be required to achieve sufficient wireless transmission of electrical energy. For example, in instances where the distance between the transmitting antenna 18 and the receiving antenna 20 is relatively large, i.e., greater than about half the length of the transmitting antenna, or the respective transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20 are not oriented directly facing each. Furthermore, when the respective transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20 are oriented such that they are tilted, shifted, or rotated with respect to each other a high inductance inductor coil may be required to achieve sufficient wireless transmission of electrical energy. It is noted that coupling is generally at a maximum when the respective transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20 are directly facing each other.
In one or more embodiments, as a first-order approximation, the voltage induced in the receiving inductor coil 50 due to current flowing in a transmitting antenna 20 is about proportional to the number of turns of the transmitting inductor coil 50 of the transmitting antenna (NTX), the amount of current flowing through the transmitting antenna (ITX), and the number of turns of the receiving inductor coil (NRX). Thus, the induced voltage can be calculated using the following equation: Vinduced=f (NTX× NRX×ITX). Furthermore, in this embodiment, it is assumed that NRX is fixed and is not a design variable. In addition, in this example, it is assumed that Itx is maximized and the nrx×ITX product is not capable of inducing a sufficient voltage on the receiving inductor coil. Therefore, in one or more embodiments, to increase induced voltage in the receiving antenna 20, the number of turns of the transmitting inductor coil 50 of the transmitting antenna (NTX) should be increased.
It is generally noted that as the number of turns of the transmitting or receiving antenna 18, 20 is increased, the self-resonant frequency (SRF) of the respective antenna structure typically becomes too small for the amount of current in the coil to be assumed as quasi-static. In other words, the phase difference of the current becomes too large. In addition, other spurious effects may include the respective transmitting or receiving antenna 18, 20 becoming increasingly sensitive and lossy in the presence of extraneous objects, such as a metallic object. In addition, a high inductance may result due to the large number of turns of the inductor coil. This, therefore requires the addition of a capacitance for tuning the inductance of the respective transmitting or receiving antenna 18, 20, particularly at the operating frequency. It is further noted that the required capacitance value required to tune the inductance may be of the order of the parasitic capacitance of the respective inductor coil.
Therefore, in one or more embodiments, capacitive components may be introduced within the transmitting and/or receiving antenna 18, 20 in order to achieve the required number of inductor coil turns while reducing sensitivity of the antenna to electrical loads and the presence of metallic objects. Thus, relatively small inductor coils 50, 86 may be connected in series with capacitors 96. In one or more embodiments, the inductor coils 50, 86 may be connected in series with capacitors 96 that are electrically connected within a circuit such as a printed circuit board (PCB) or flexible circuit board (FCB).
In one or more embodiments surface mount capacitors may be soldered on a PCB or FCB. Alternatively, to surface mount capacitors, a parallel plate capacitor 130 and/or an unt capacitor 132 may be fabricated on or within the PCB or FPC to impart a desired capacitance to the transmitting or receiving antenna 18, 20.
In one or more embodiments, the parallel plate capacitor 130, as shown in
Non-limiting examples of an interdigitated capacitor 132 are shown in
In one or more embodiments, the inter-digitated capacitor 132 can be integrated within a substrate 110 such as a PCB shown in
Prior art magnetically coupled transmitting antennas cannot wirelessly transmit electrical energy over long distance, typically on the order of about 0 mm to about 60 mm. Generally, for increased wireless transmission distances, the inductance of the antenna is increased to achieve target coupling required to induce a desired voltage within the receiving inductor coil 86 of the receiving antenna 20. Increasing the inductance of the transmitting inductor coil 50 however, typically leads to a decrease in the self-resonance frequency (SRF) of the transmitting antenna 18. Thus, if the inductance is too high, the SRF of the transmitting antenna 18 may be reduced, for example, less than approximately four times the operating frequency, which may lead to increased sensitivity of the transmitting inductor coil 50 to variations in electrical load and the presence of metallic objects. In addition, if the inductance of the transmitting antenna 18 is too high, the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the transmitting antenna 18 at the operating frequency, may result in reduced efficiency of the transfer of wireless electrical energy. In one or more embodiments, interdigitated capacitors 132 are not only useful for tuning the transmitting inductor coil 50 and/or the receiving inductor coil 86 but can also be used to minimize sensitivity of the respective coil 50, 86 between coil traces. In this embodiment, shifts in current phase are created by the interdigitated capacitor 132 itself without the need for additional electronic components. In one or more embodiments, interdigitated capacitors 132 can be used in lieu of surface mount capacitors to tune transmitting and receiving inductor coils 50, 86 as well as for minimizing sensitivity of respective transmitting and receiving inductor coils 50, 86 to metallic surfaces that may be positioned in the vicinity of the coil.
In one or more embodiments, the inventive concepts of the present application outlined herein enable the design of the transmitting antenna 18 that is capable of transmitting wireless electrical energy and data over increased distances at relatively low amounts of transmitting antenna current (ITx) while maintaining a relatively low inductance. Thus, the wireless electrical energy transmitting system 14 of the present application is more efficient and less sensitive to variations in electrical loads and the presence of metallic objects. The wireless electrical energy transmitting system 14 of the present application, therefore, comprises a transmitting antenna 18 having increased self-resonant frequencies, an increased quality factor and an increased receiving coupling efficiency (RCE).
In one or more embodiments, capacitance such as lumped capacitive elements 154 (
It is noted that antennas with low inductance and low coupling generally require higher current from an amplifier (not shown) to feed the required electrical power. High inductance/coupling designs, requiring less current are characterized by a relatively large impedance shift, high ESR, and low SRF.
An example of such a high inductance/coupling transmitting antenna 18 is a “High Range” AIR-Fuel transmitter. In one or more embodiments, a “High Range” AIR-Fuel transmitter is a transmitting antenna 18 configured to wirelessly transmit electrical energy in a “z-axis” direction over a transmission distance of between about 25 mm to about 40 mm. Such “High Range” AIR-Fuel transmitters require inductances, on the order of between about 8 pH to about 12 pH, to achieve target coupling over the “z-axis” transmission distance.
In one or more embodiments, the transmitting or receiving inductor coil 50, 86 is configured having an increased number of turns that increase the inductance of the respective inductor coil. As inductance of the transmitting or receiving coil 50, 86 increases, the inductor coil's self-resonant frequency approaches the operating frequency. Furthermore, the electrical impedance of the inductor coil may change in the presence of metallic surfaces and non-conductive bodies having a relative permittivity greater than 1. Thus, the presence of metallic surfaces and/or non-conductive bodies having a relative permittivity greater than 1 may lead to detuning of the respective inductor coil 50, 86 and/or a decrease in the efficiency of the transmission of wireless electrical energy. In addition, this condition may result in an increased temperature of either or both the transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20, which may potentially damage the power amplifier or other antenna circuitry.
In one or more embodiments, capacitors 96, such as lumped capacitive elements 154, a parallel plate capacitor 130, an interdigitated capacitor 132, a surface mount capacitor (not shown), or a combination thereof may be used to minimize de-tuning and potentially over heating of the transmitting antenna 18, receiving antenna 20, or repeater 32. In one or more embodiments, capacitors 96, such as lumped capacitive elements 154, a parallel plate capacitor 130, an interdigitated capacitor 132, a surface mount capacitor (not shown), or a combination thereof are electrically connected at appropriate locations on the respective transmitting inductor coil 50, receiving inductor coil 86 or repeater inductor coil 98 to decrease electrical impedance of the respective inductor coil. As a result, the inductance of the respective coil is increased which increases coupling between either of the transmitting antenna 18, the receiving antenna 20, the repeater 32, and combinations thereof, particularly over relatively large transmission distances on the order of about 30 mm. In addition, the distributed capacitors help to reduce phase difference across the length of the respective inductor coil 50, 86, 98. Reduction of phase differences results in a more even electrical current distribution which reduces impedance shift and decreases the impedance of the respective transmitting antenna 18, receiving antenna 20 or repeater 32. It is noted that the transmitting inductor coil 50 most efficiently transfers electrical power when it is perfectly tuned. Impedance shifts are generally due to the presence of metallic objects that couple with the transmitting inductor coil 50. The presence of a metallic object may change the imaginary impedance of the transmitting inductor coil 50, which generally results in the de-tuning of the wireless electrical energy transmitting system 14.
As illustrated in
Table VII shown above details the measured inductance, equivalent series resistance (ESR) and self-resonant frequency (SRF) of various receiving antennas 20 configured with capacitors 96 having various capacitances. In the experiment, a receiving antenna 20 comprising a receiving inductor coil 86 having a length of 100 mm and a width of 100 mm with 12 turns was used. In the configurations listed in Table VII, shown above, two capacitors, each having the capacitance as detailed in the second column of Table VII were electrically connected to the receiving antenna 20. For example, the receiving antenna identified as D200 pF was configured with two capacitors, each having a capacitance of 200 pF that were electrically connected to the receiving inductor coil 86. It is noted that the receiving antenna identified as D∞pF was not configured with a capacitor and therefore only comprised the receiving inductor coil 86.
As shown in Table VII, adding capacitors 96 to the receiving coil 86 reduced impedance shifts, increased resonator coupling efficiency and lowered the sensitivity of the receiving inductor coil 86 by decreasing the electrical impedance of the receiving antenna 20. As detailed in Table VII above, receiving antenna D∞pF that was not configured with a capacitor, exhibited the greatest inductance, ESR, and lowest SRF. In contrast, receiving antenna D68pf, which comprised two 68 pF capacitors, exhibited the lowest inductance, a reduced ESR and increased SRF. This electrical performance can be explained because as capacitance decreases, imaginary impedance increases. As a result, the overall impedance of the receiving inductor coil 86 decreases, and the inductor coil becomes closer to in phase, thus SRF and ESR are reduced.
In one or more embodiments, the inductance of the transmitting inductor coil 50, the receiving inductor coil 86 and the repeater inductor coil 98, may be reduced by electrically connecting lumped capacitors 154 along the length of the respective inductor coil 50, 86, 98. If, for example, the inductance is reduced to 4 μH from 16 μH the impedance variation comes out to be between [−21j to 13j], a variation of 34j, which is equivalent to an inductance of 0.8 μH. In one or more embodiments, the efficiency of the wireless transmission of electrical energy is increased by tuning the transmitting and receiving inductor coils 50, 86 to a specific operating frequency using capacitance that is electrically connected to the inductor coil. In the embodiment disclosed above, an inductor coil 50, 86 having an inductance of about 4 μH generally requires a tuning capacitance of between about 400 pf to about 600 pf. An inductor coil 50, 86 with an inductance of about 16 μH generally requires a tuning capacitance of between about 50 pF to 150 pF. It is noted however that using a tuning capacitance of a relatively low value may reduce the transmission distance of the transmitting antenna 18 as the tolerance of the tuning capacitance may de-tune the antenna. Furthermore, an inductor coil 50, 86 with an increased inductance of 16 μH typically generates a magnetic field having an increased magnitude which could undesirably couple with a metallic object. As a result, the impedance sensitivity of the inductor coil 50, 86 may increase. Thus, for these reasons outlined in this example, it is beneficial to reduce the inductance of the inductor coil 50, 86 using the addition of lumped capacitive elements 154 and/or surface mount capacitors to tailor the inductance of the inductor coil 50, 86 that utilizes an optimal tuning capacitance.
Table VIII summaries the measured values of quality factor, coil-to-coil efficiency (RCE), Mutual inductance and impedance shift for various antenna configurations. In this experiment, coil-to-coil efficiency (RCE), Mutual inductance (M), and impedance shift measurements were performed using an RIT3-1 certified Resonator Interface Tester (RIT) from AIR-FUEL Rezence specification. The instrument is intended to simulate impedance shift, coupling and voltage range of a cellular phone antenna with an embedded wireless power resonator. The RIT3-1 device comprises an inductor coil having a length of 78 mm and a width of 52 mm that is supported by a magnetic field shielding material comprising Panasonic's KNZNCR ferrite material having a thickness of 0.7 mm. During the testing, the RIT3-1 instrument was electrically connected to various capacitors having a capacitance as detailed in the “Capacitance” column of Table VIII.
Various antenna electrical performance parameters including quality factor, coil-to-coil efficiency (RCE), Mutual inductance (M), and impedance shift were measured with the RIT3-1 instrument connected to capacitors having various capacitance values as detailed in Table VIII. It is noted that configuration D∞pF did not comprise a capacitor. In one or more embodiments, coil-to-coil efficiency (RCE) was calculated by deriving the optimal efficiency at an optimal electrical load on the receiving antenna. Mutual Inductance was measured directly from scattering parameters (S-parameters) that summarize the electrical parameters of the 2 port network that comprised the transmitting and receiving inductor coils.
It is noted that the D96 pF antenna, as detailed in Table VIII above, measured the highest quality factor. This correlates with Impedance analyzer measurements that also showed the D96 pF antenna having the lowest ESR (Table VII) and also increased RCE measurement where it measured a significant improvement of 6.01% over the D0pF antenna. The D∞pF antenna measured the highest Mutual Inductance at about 650 nH which decreased by about 24% to 500 nH with the D68 pF antenna.
Thus, it is contemplated that the wireless electrical energy transfer system of the present disclosure is capable of being configured having a variety of receiving and transmitting antenna configurations. Furthermore, such a configuration of the variety of antennas allows for and significantly improves the wireless transmission of electrical energy and/or data across significantly increased distances such that electronic devices can be electrically charged or powered by positioning them a distance away from the source of wireless electrical energy. It is further contemplated that the various magnetic shielding materials 70 can be strategically positioned adjacent to the transmitting or receiving antennas 18, 20 to enhance quality factor and Mutual inductance between adjacently positioned transmitting and receiving antennas 18, 20. It is appreciated that various modifications to the inventive concepts described herein may be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
As used herein, the phrase “at least one of” preceding a series of items, with the term “and” or “or” to separate any of the items, modifies the list as a whole, rather than each member of the list (i.e., each item). The phrase “at least one of” does not require selection of at least one of each item listed; rather, the phrase allows a meaning that includes at least one of any one of the items, and/or at least one of any combination of the items, and/or at least one of each of the items. By way of example, the phrases “at least one of A, B, and C” or “at least one of A, B, or C” each refer to only A, only B, or only C; any combination of A, B, and C; and/or at least one of each of A, B, and C.
The predicate words “configured to”, “operable to”, and “programmed to” do not imply any particular tangible or intangible modification of a subject, but, rather, are intended to be used interchangeably. In one or more embodiments, a processor configured to monitor and control an operation or a component may also mean the processor being programmed to monitor and control the operation or the processor being operable to monitor and control the operation. Likewise, a processor configured to execute code can be construed as a processor programmed to execute code or operable to execute code.
A phrase such as “an aspect” does not imply that such aspect is essential to the subject technology or that such aspect applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to an aspect may apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. An aspect may provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such as an “aspect” may refer to one or more aspects and vice versa. A phrase such as an “embodiment” does not imply that such embodiment is essential to the subject technology or that such embodiment applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to an embodiment may apply to all embodiments, or one or more embodiments. An embodiment may provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such an “embodiment” may refer to one or more embodiments and vice versa. A phrase such as a “configuration” does not imply that such configuration is essential to the subject technology or that such configuration applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to a configuration may apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. A configuration may provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such as a “configuration” may refer to one or more configurations and vice versa.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” or as an “example” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “include,” “have,” or the like is used in the description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprise” as “comprise” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “include,” “have,” or the like is used in the description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprise” as “comprise” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various aspects described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited using the phrase “step for.”
Reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more.” Unless specifically stated otherwise, the term “some” refers to one or more. Pronouns in the masculine (e.g., his) include the feminine and neuter gender (e.g., her and its) and vice versa. Headings and subheadings, if any, are used for convenience only and do not limit the subject disclosure.
While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of particular implementations of the subject matter. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub combination or variation of a sub combination.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/458,261, filed on Feb. 13, 2017, the disclosure of which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2797393 | Clogston | Jun 1957 | A |
| 2911605 | Wales, Jr. | Nov 1959 | A |
| 3484731 | Rich | Dec 1969 | A |
| 4328531 | Shinagawa | May 1982 | A |
| 4494100 | Nejdl | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4959631 | Hasegawa et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4996165 | Asbeck | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5137478 | Graf | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5237165 | Tingley, III | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5604352 | Schuetz | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5639989 | Higgins, III | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5713939 | Nedungadi | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5748464 | Schuetz | May 1998 | A |
| 5767808 | Skogland | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5767813 | Yao | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777538 | Schuetz | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5801611 | Waanders | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5808587 | Shima | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5838154 | Nishibe | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5883392 | Schuetz | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892489 | Mandai | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5980773 | Takeda | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6005193 | Markel | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6021337 | Hodge | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028568 | Mandai | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6107972 | Seward | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6148221 | Hidaka | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6163307 | Park | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6271803 | Kanba | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6501364 | Hui et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6503831 | Speakman | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6556101 | Tada | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6583769 | Asakura | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6664863 | Ikeda | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6809688 | Yamada | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6897830 | Bae et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6924230 | Sheu | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7046113 | Ikeda | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7205655 | Sippola | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7355558 | Lee | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7563352 | Hubel | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7579835 | Schnell | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7579836 | Schnell | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7713762 | Lee | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7786836 | Gabara | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7952365 | Kushta | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7962186 | Cui et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8056819 | Rowell | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8299877 | Hong | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8436780 | Compston | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8541974 | Farahani | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8567048 | Babcock | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8610530 | Singh | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8653927 | Singh | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8680960 | Singh | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8692641 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8692642 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8698590 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8698591 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8707546 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8710948 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8766483 | Cook et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8774712 | Sato | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8803649 | Singh | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8823481 | Singh | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8823482 | Singh | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8855786 | Derbas | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8860545 | Singh | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8898885 | Babcock | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9178369 | Partovi | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9208942 | Frysz | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9559526 | Von Novak, III et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9698632 | Davison et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9912173 | Tseng | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 10110046 | Esquibel et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
| 20020020554 | Sakamoto | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020053992 | Kawakami | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020071003 | Kimura | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020075191 | Yokoshima | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020101383 | Junod | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020105080 | Speakman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030006069 | Watanabe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058180 | Foster | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119677 | Gao | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040000974 | Odenaal | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040085247 | Capelli | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040108311 | De Rooij | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118920 | He | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040140528 | Soo | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040159460 | Passiopoulos | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040189528 | Delgado | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040217488 | Luechinger | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040227608 | Nakatani et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050121229 | Sueyoshi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050174628 | Shoucheng | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060022772 | Kanno | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040628 | Porret | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060192645 | Lee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060284718 | Benetik | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070018767 | Gabara | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070020969 | Yungers | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070023424 | Weber | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070029965 | Hui | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045773 | Mizuno | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070046544 | Sano | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070095913 | Takahashi | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070120629 | Schnell | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179570 | De Taboada | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070182367 | Partovi | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070267718 | Lee | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070279287 | Castaneda | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080039332 | Touitou | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080055178 | Kim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080062066 | Arai | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080067874 | Tseng | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150693 | You | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158092 | Yakubo et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164840 | Kato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164844 | Kato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164960 | Schnell | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080197802 | Onishi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080211320 | Secall | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080277386 | Haimer | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283277 | Kusama | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080303735 | Fukimoto | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090015266 | Narita | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079628 | Rofougaran | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090085706 | Duckworth | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090096413 | Partovi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090108974 | Raggam | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090134875 | Tomiha | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140691 | Jung | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090152542 | Leung | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090160262 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090230777 | Baarman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261778 | Kook | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261936 | Sarangan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100033290 | Frye | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100038970 | Cook et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100072588 | Yang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100127660 | Widmer | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141042 | Giler | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100156344 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100164296 | Soljacic | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100201201 | Mobarhan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100219694 | Kurs et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289599 | Vangala | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289709 | Guan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295701 | Cazenave | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110024510 | Ishino | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110084656 | Gao | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110101788 | Sun et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137379 | Wosmek | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110210617 | Randall | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110234155 | Chen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110241437 | Kanno | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110248891 | Park | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110279198 | Haner | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120010079 | Sedwick | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120062345 | Kurs | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120095531 | Derbas | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120126544 | Simpson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120169434 | Mori | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120217819 | Yamakawa et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120222997 | Potucek et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120223595 | Oodachi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235500 | Schatz | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235634 | Kulikowski | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235636 | Partovi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120248889 | Fukushi et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120249396 | Parsche | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120274148 | Sung et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120280765 | Kurs et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120306284 | Lee et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120326931 | Kato | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130067737 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067738 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130068499 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130068507 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069748 | Frysz | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069749 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069750 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069843 | Frysz | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130076154 | Baarman | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130146671 | Woerle | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130181535 | Muratov | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130199027 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130199028 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200070 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200722 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200968 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200969 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200976 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130201589 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130205582 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207744 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130208389 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130208390 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130257362 | Lim | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130285606 | Ben-Shalom et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130300207 | Wang | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130335284 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140008974 | Miyamoto | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140028111 | Hansen | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140035383 | Riehl | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140035793 | Ozawa | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140041218 | Signh | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140043196 | Gouchi et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140047713 | Derbas | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140063666 | Kallal et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140084946 | Gadot | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140091756 | Ofstein | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140168019 | Uejima | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140183971 | Endo | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140197694 | Asanuma et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140203398 | Sturcken | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140231518 | Yosui | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140239892 | Sawa et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140252875 | Lee | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140265617 | Roy et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140266019 | Pigott | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140292100 | Lee et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140333148 | Uchida | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140339913 | Tsuji et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361628 | Keeling | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150054455 | Kim | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150076922 | Kato et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150091502 | Mukherjee et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150102892 | Yeo et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150115723 | Levo et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150115727 | Carobolante et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150130583 | Zheng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150136858 | Finn | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150137746 | Lee et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150140807 | Mohammed | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150145634 | Kurz | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150145635 | Duetsch | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150180440 | Ishizuka | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150207541 | Kuroda | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150222129 | McCauley et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150236513 | Covic et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150236545 | Song | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150236550 | Yang et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150280322 | Saito | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150295416 | Li | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150302985 | Kurs | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150318710 | Lee et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150351292 | Chang et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150357827 | Muratov et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150379838 | Xie | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160029266 | Choi-Grogan | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160043571 | Kesler et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160056664 | Partovi | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160072338 | Makwinski et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160099610 | Leabman et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160111208 | Park et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160111889 | Jeong | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160118711 | Ummenhofer | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160126002 | Chen | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160141899 | Oo et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160149416 | Ha et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160156103 | Bae et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160156215 | Bae | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160224975 | Na | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160233711 | Miller et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160261147 | Blum et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160268847 | Yuasa | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160292669 | Tunnell | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160322156 | Yeh et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160322850 | Yeh et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160322852 | Yeh | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160344196 | Ahmad et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160345472 | Park | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170126544 | Vigneras et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170187238 | Chong et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170279294 | Fujii | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170301462 | Dela Cruz | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170317536 | Marson et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170324267 | Decker | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170345555 | Jang et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180032730 | Miller et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180055175 | Rho | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180090968 | Pais et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180138746 | Jang | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180166921 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180167107 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180167108 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180167109 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180167110 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180168057 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180205268 | Park | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180212649 | Tenno | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180233801 | Peralta | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180316085 | Park et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190006094 | Furiya et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190052124 | Riehl et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2650300 | Oct 2004 | CN |
| 103944196 | Jul 2014 | CN |
| 104037493 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 104037494 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 0310396 | Apr 1989 | EP |
| 2775565 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| 1609503 | Dec 2005 | EP |
| 2031729 | Mar 2009 | EP |
| 2557630 | Feb 2013 | EP |
| 2775564 | Sep 2014 | EP |
| 1-310518 | Dec 1989 | JP |
| 5-83249 | Apr 1993 | JP |
| H0582349 | Apr 1993 | JP |
| 2008-307114 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 09-093005 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| 10-255629 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 2001344574 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2007-7042569 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2008-160781 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2008-205215 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2008-294285 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2008307114 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2012-147408 | Aug 2012 | JP |
| 2013-93429 | May 2013 | JP |
| 2014-175864 | Sep 2014 | JP |
| 2014-175865 | Sep 2014 | JP |
| 10-20100092741 | Aug 2010 | KR |
| 10-2013-0015618 | Feb 2013 | KR |
| 10-2014-0111554 | Sep 2014 | KR |
| 10-2014-0111794 | Sep 2014 | KR |
| 2014-0135357 | Nov 2014 | KR |
| 10-1559939 | Oct 2015 | KR |
| 20160128861 | Nov 2016 | KR |
| 201436494 | Sep 2014 | TW |
| 201436495 | Sep 2014 | TW |
| 2008050917 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2010104569 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2010129369 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| EP Search Report 10751119.8. |
| EP Search Report 13001121.6. |
| EP Search Report 13001130.7. |
| EP Search Report 14000885.5. |
| Relative Permativity—Dielectric Constant—Jul. 2011 (3 pages). |
| Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016 in corresponding EP Application No. 13 001 130.7 (6 pages). |
| Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016 in corresponding EP Application No. 13 001 121.6 (6 pages). |
| Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017 in corresponding JP Application No. 2013-047049 (5 pages). |
| Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2017 in corresponding EP Application No. 14000885.5 (4 pages). |
| Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2017 in corresponding TW Application No. 102108342 (10 pages). |
| Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2017 in corresponding JP Application No. 2013-047048 (12 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 14, 2016 for PCT/US2016/045588 (10 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 28, 2016 for PCT/US2016/047607 (9 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated issued in PCT/US2017/048708 dated Nov. 8, 2017 (10 pages). |
| Written Opinion and International Search Report issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017.065329 dated Feb. 21, 2018 (7 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048 dated Dec. 12, 2017 (11 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201310074946.8 dated Mar. 30, 2018 (12 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201310075086.X dated Mar. 27, 2018 (11 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048 dated May 8, 2018 (2 pages). |
| Decision of Dismissal of Amendment issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048 dated May 8, 2018 (7 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 102108345 dated Apr. 27, 2018 (11 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047049 dated Nov. 28, 2017 (5 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201310075086.X dated Aug. 25, 2017 (13 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201310074946.8 dated Aug. 23, 2017 (13 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201310074946.8 dated Sep. 12, 2018 (9 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201310075086.X dated Sep. 12, 2018 (10 pages). |
| Notification of Reasons for Refusal issued in corresponding Korean Application No. 10-2013-0026135, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 12 pages. |
| Notification of Reasons for Refusal issued in corresponding Korean Application No. 10-2013-0025858, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 12 pages. |
| EP Office Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) dated Jan. 17, 2019 for EP App. No. 13001121.6-1216. |
| EP Communication pursuant to Rule 164(1) EPC regarding partial supplementary European Search Report for EP App. No. 16835665.7-1212 dated Feb. 14, 2019, 20 pages. |
| Muratov, V., Multi-Mode Wireless Power Systems can be a bridge to the Promised Land of Universal Contactless charging, Mediatek, Inc., Nov. 20, 2014, 15 pages. |
| Qi 2010, “System Description Wireless Power Transfer”, vol. 1, Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1, Oct. 2010, Wireless Power Consortium, 86 pages. |
| Narayanan, R., “Wireless Power Charging Coil Changing Considerations”, Wurth Elektronik, Feb. 23, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Barcelo, T., “Wireless Power User Guide”, Linear Technology, Application Note 138, Oct. 2013, 8 pages. |
| Yoon, Y., “Embedded conductor technology for micromachined RF elements”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Jun. 2005, 11 pages. |
| Burghartz, J., “On the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 3, Mar. 2003, pp. 718-729. |
| Qi 2009, “System Description Wireless Power Transfer”, vol. 1, Low Power, Version 0.95, Jul. 2009, 76 pages. |
| Lee, Y., “Antenna Circuit Design for RFID Applications”, 2003 Microchip Technology, AN710, 50 pages. |
| Sun, M., et al., “Apparatus for Wireless Power and Data Transfer Over a Distance”, University of Pittsburgh, Jun. 2009, 30 pages. |
| IPR2019-00858—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., 90 pages. |
| IPR2019-00858—Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960. |
| IPR2019-00858—Ex 1004—File History for U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960. |
| Ex. 1002 Declaration of Dr. Steven Leeb, 115 pages. |
| Ex. 1003—CV of Dr. Steven B. Leeb, 7 pages. |
| Ex. 1005—US20070267718A1 to Lee, 13 pages. |
| Ex. 1006—Semat—Physics Chapters 29-32, 81 pages, (1958). |
| Ex 1009—US20090096413 to Partovi, 88 pages. |
| Ex 1010—IEEE Dictionary 1996 (excerpt), 9 pages. |
| Ex. 1011—US20070089773A1 to Koester et al., 26 pages. |
| Ex. 1012—US20120280765 to Kurs, 122 pages. |
| First Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201680058731.9 dated Aug. 5, 2019, English Translation, 6 pages. |
| Extended Search Report for EP 19188841.1-1216 dated Sep. 10, 2019, 11 pages. |
| Ex. 1013—U.S. Pat. No. 6,432,497 to Bunyan, 12 pages. |
| Ex. 1014 U.S. Pat. No. 6,083,842 to Cheung et al., 8 pages. |
| Ex. 1015 Reinhold—Efficient Antenna Design of Inductive Coupled RFID—Systems with High Power Demand, Journal of Communication vol. 2, No. 6, Nov. 2007, 10 pages. |
| Ex. 1016 U.S. Pat. No. 4,549,042 to Akiba et al., 8 pages. |
| Ex. 1017—U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,344 to Balakrishnan, 12 pages. |
| Ex. 1018—Wheeler, Formulas for the Skin (1942), 13 pages. |
| Ex. 1019—Kyriazidou—U.S. Pat. No. 7,236,080,12 pages. |
| Ex. 1020 Alldred et al., “A 1.2 V, 60 Ghz radio receiver with onchip transformers and inductors in 90 nm CMOS,” Proc. IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuits SYmp , pp. 51-54, Nov. 2006 (“Alldred”), 12 pages. |
| Ex. 1022 U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 to Tseng, 31 pages. |
| Ex. 1023 U.S. Pat. No. 7,248,138 to Chiang, 18 pages. |
| Ex. 1024 U.S. Pat. No. 5,084,958 to Yerman et al., 20 pages. |
| Ex. 1025—US20070126544—Wotherspoon, 6 pages. |
| Ex. 1028—U.S. Pat. No. 9,820,374 to Bois et al., 9 pages. |
| Ex. 1029 U.S. Pat. No. 7,601,919 to Phan et al., 14 pages. |
| Ex. 1030 U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,825 to Wojnarowski et al., 10 pages. |
| Ex. 1031 Ahn U.S. Pat. No. 7,305,725, 9 pages. |
| Ex. 1032—U.S. Pat. No. 5,745,331 to Shamouilian et al., 23 pages. |
| Ex. 1033—Hu, et al., “AC Resistance to Planar Power Inductors and the Quasidistributed Gap Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 16, No. 4, Jul. 2001 (“Hu”), 13 pages. |
| Ex. 1034—U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,363 to Fazelpour, 8 pages. |
| Ex. 1035—IEEE Xplore web page, 2 pages. |
| Ex. 1036 Kraemer et al., “Architecture Considerations for 60 GhzPulse Transceiver Front-Ends,” CAS 2007 Proceedings vol. 2, 2007, Int'l Semiconductor Conference (2007), 26 pages. |
| Ex. 1037—Varonen et al., “V-band Balanced Resistive Mixer in 65-nm CMOS,” Proceedings of the 33rd European Solid-State Circuits Conference (2007), 22 pages. |
| Ex. 1038—IEEE Xplore web page, 2 pages. |
| Ex. 1039—Lopera et al., “A Multiwinding Modeling Method for High Frequency Transformers and Inductors”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 18, No. 3, May 2003, 14 pages. |
| Ex. 1040—Leonavicius et al., “Comparison of Realization Techniques for PFC Inductor Operating in Discontinuous Conduction Mode,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 2, Mar. 2004, 14 pages. |
| Ex. 1041—Roshen, W.A., “Fringing Field Formulas and Winding Loss Due to an Air Gap,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43, No. 8, Aug. 2007, 12 pages. |
| IPR2019-00859—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, 87 pages. |
| Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 to Singh et al., 50 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—Prosecution History of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, 322 pages (in two attachments A and B) due to size. |
| IPR2019-00860—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, 86 pages. |
| IPR2019-00861—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, 89 pages. |
| IPR2019-00862—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948, 88 pages. |
| Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 to Singh et al., 50 pages. |
| Ex. 1004 File History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 to Singh et al., 213 pages. |
| IPR2019-0863 Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, 89 pages. |
| Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, 49 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—Prosecution History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, 180 pages. |
| EP Communication pursuant to Rule 62 EPC regarding extended European Search Report for EP App. No. 16835665.7-1212 dated May 15, 2019, 16 pages. |
| Notification of Decision of Rejection for KR App. No. 10-2013-0025858 dated May 14, 2019, English Translation, 8 pages. |
| Notification of Decision of Rejection for KR 10-2013-0026135 dated May 14, 2019, 8 pages with translation. |
| EP Communication of extended European Search Report for EP 19154162.2 dated Jun. 12, 2019, 9 pages. |
| Exhibit A-34: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, 391 pages. |
| Exhibit B-01: Invalidity Contentions: '046PATENT in View of Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Japanese Patent ApplicationPublication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), 50 pages. |
| Exhibit B-02: Invalidity Contentions: '046PATENT in View of Kurs '694, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs'694”), 51 pages. |
| Exhibit B-03: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”), 76 pages. |
| Exhibit B-04: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), 44 pages. |
| Exhibit B-05: Invalidity Contentions: '046PATENT in View of Baarman '777, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2009/0230777A1 (“Baarman '777”), 42 pages. |
| Exhibit B-06: Invalidity Contentions: '046PATENT in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-Dlc (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 3atent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), 71 pages. |
| Exhibit B-07: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Burghartz &Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by on the Designof RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), 45 pages. |
| Exhibit B-08: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), 75 pages. |
| Exhibit B-09: Invalidity Contentions: '046PATENT in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2011/084656 A1 (“Gao”), 33 pages. |
| Exhibit B-10: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Hasegawa '215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Japanese PatentApplication Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru”), 42 pages. |
| Exhibit B-11: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by J.P. PatentApplication Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), 69 pages. |
| Exhibit B-12: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Hasegawa Michio '631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) byU.S. Pat. No. 4,959,631 A (“Hasegawa Michio '631”), 37 pages. |
| Exhibit B-13: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by JP Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/294285 A (“Ishihara Keien”), 33 pages. |
| Exhibit B-14: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kato '840, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 32 pages. |
| Exhibit B-15: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kato '844, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 37 pages. |
| Exhibit B-16: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Inventor Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), 53 pages. |
| Exhibit B-17: Invalidity Contentions: '046Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs'765”), 50 pages. |
| Exhibit B-18: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Misumi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Japanese. PatentApplication Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misumi Shuichi”), 33 pages. |
| Exhibit B-19: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), 51 pages. |
| Exhibit B-20: Invalidity Contentions: '046Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), 37 pages. |
| Exhibit B-21: Invalidity Contentions '046 Patent in View of Inventor Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), 39 pages. |
| Exhibit B-22: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N. Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), 55 pages. |
| Exhibit B-23: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of 01 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Qi System Description,Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), 23 pages. |
| Exhibit B-24: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Qi 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Qi System Description,Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), 44 pages. |
| Exhibit B-25: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,587 A (“HiroshiShima”), 76 pages. |
| Exhibit B-26: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), 55 pages. |
| Exhibit B-27: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 B2(“Ryan Tseng”), 62 pages. |
| Exhibit B-28: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), 50 pages. |
| Exhibit B-29: Invalidity Contentions: '046PATENT in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), 36 pages. |
| Exhibit B-30: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Yoon & Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Embedded Conductor Technology for Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), 39 pages. |
| Exhibit B-31: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, 135 pages. |
| Exhibit B-32: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by the LG G2, 401 pages. |
| Exhibit B-33: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the LG G3, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. at al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by the LG G3, 200 pages. |
| Exhibit B-34: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, 340 pages. |
| Exhibit C-01: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by Japanese PatentApplication Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), 59 pages. |
| Exhibit C-02: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kurs '694, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs'694”), 61 pages. |
| Exhibit C-03: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”), 84 pages. |
| Exhibit C-04: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), 58 pages. |
| Exhibit C-05: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Baarman '777, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by 2009/0230777A1 (“Baarman '777”), 57 pages. |
| Exhibit C-06: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Burghartz &Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by on the Designof RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), 61 pages. |
| Exhibit C-07:lnvalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), 98 pages. |
| Exhibit C-08: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/084656 A1 (“Gao”), 49 pages. |
| Exhibit C-09: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Hasegawa'215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by Japanese PatentApplication Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru”), 50 pages. |
| Exhibit C-10: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by J.P. PatentApplication Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), 85 pages. |
| Exhibit C-11: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Hasegawa'631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,631 A (“Hasegawa'631”), 40 pages. |
| Exhibit C-12: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by JP Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/294285 A (“Ishihara Keien”), 40 pages. |
| Exhibit C-13: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kato '840, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 35 pages. |
| Exhibit C 14: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kato '844, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 39 pages. |
| Exhibit C-15: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), 52 pages. |
| Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 B2, 6 pages. |
| Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review of IPR2019-0858, 44 pages. |
| Decision Granting of Inter Partes Review Case IPR2019-00862 re U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 B2, 41 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 17, 2019, issued in connection with EP Application No. 17879649.6, 9 pages. |
| Ex. 1001—U.S. Pat. 10,063,100, 48 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,157, Part 1, 475 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,157, Part 2, 475 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,157, Part 3, 438 pages. |
| Ex. 1005—U.S. Publication 2014-0035383 to Riehl, 11 pages. |
| Ex. 1006—Riehl P.S., et al., “Wireless Power Systems for Mobile Devices Supporting Inductive and Resonant Operating Modes,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Therory and Techniques, Mar. 2015, vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 780-790 (17 pages). |
| Ex. 1007 U.S. Publication 2011/0241437 to Kanno, 21 pages. |
| Ex. 1008—U.S. Publication 2012/0274148 to Sung et al., 13 pages. |
| Ex. 1009—JP Patent No. 2013-93429 to Kazuya, 27 pages. |
| Ex. 1010—U.S. Publication No. 2015/0091502 to Mukherjee et al., 7 pages. |
| Ex. 1011—KR Patent No. 10-2013-0045307 to Yu, 45 pages. |
| Ex. 1012—IEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques, New York, NY 1953, 17 pages. |
| Ex. 1013—ASA, et al., “A Novel Multi-Level Phase-Controlled Resonant Inverter with Common Mode Capacitor for Wireless EV Chargers,” 2015, 6 pages. |
| Ex. 1014—Abstract of a Novel Multi-Level Phase-Controlled Resonant Inverter with Common Mode Capacitor for Wireless EV Chargers, IEEE XPlore Digital Library, 2 pages. |
| Exhibit A-01: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.), Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), 56 pages. |
| Exhibit A-02: Invalidity Contentions: '960PATENT in View of Kurs '694, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2010/0219694 Al (“Kurs '694”), 59 pages. |
| Exhibit A-03: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”). 86 pages. |
| Exhibit A-04: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), 51 pages. |
| Exhibit A-05: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Baarman '777, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0230777A1 (“Baarman '777”), 50 pages. |
| Exhibit A-06: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), 80 pages. |
| Exhibit A-07: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), 82 pages. |
| Exhibit A-08: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 20111084656 A1 (“Gao”), 39 pages. |
| Exhibit A-09: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Burghartz &Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by on the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), 53 pages. |
| Exhibit A-10: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Hasegawa '215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru”), 46 pages. |
| Exhibit A-11: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by J.P. PatentApplication Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), 82 pages. |
| Exhibit A-12: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Hasegawa Michio '631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.n. Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,631 A (“Hasegawa Michio '631”), 43 pages. |
| Exhibit A-13: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.n. Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by JP Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/294285 A (“Ishihara Keien”), 37 pages. |
| Exhibit A-14: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.n. Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 35 pages. |
| Exhibit A-15: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.n. Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 40 pages. |
| Exhibit A-16: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.n. Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), 59 pages. |
| Exhibit A-17: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs 765”), 57 pages. |
| Exhibit A-18: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Misumi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Japanese. Patent Application Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misumi Shuichi”), 37 pages. |
| Exhibit A-19: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), 58 pages. |
| Exhibit A-20: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), 49 pages. |
| Exhibit A-21: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Inventor Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S.Patent Application Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), 45 pages. |
| Exhibit A-22: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), 64 pages. |
| Exhibit A-23: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of QI 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Qi System Description,Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), 26 pages. |
| Exhibit A-25: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,587 A(“Hiroshi Shima”), 87 pages. |
| Exhibit A-26: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), 65 pages. |
| Exhibit A-27: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Tseng,NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 3atent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 B2(“Ryan Tseng”), 67 pages. |
| Exhibit A-28: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), 57 pages. |
| Exhibit A-29: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Yamakawa,NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), 40 pages. |
| Exhibit A-30: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Yoon &Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Embedded ConductorTechnology for Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), 13 pages. |
| Exhibit A-31: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, 154 pages. |
| Exhibit A-32: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. at al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by the LG G2, 462 pages. |
| Exhibit A-33: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the Lg G3, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. at al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by the LG G3, 228 pages. |
| Exhibit C-16: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs 765”), 61 pages. |
| Exhibit C-17: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Misum, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by Japanese. PatentApplication Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misum Shuichi”), 37 pages. |
| Exhibit C-18: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), 59 pages. |
| Exhibit C-19: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), 55 pages. |
| Exhibit C-20: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Afshin Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), 56 pages. |
| Exhibit C-21: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), 77 pages. |
| Exhibit C-22: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of 01 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Qi System Description,Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), 29 pages. |
| Exhibit C-23: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of 01 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. at al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Qi System Description,Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), 57 pages. |
| Exhibit C-24: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,587 A (“Hiroshi Shima”), 102 pages. |
| Exhibit C-25: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), 68 pages. |
| Exhibit C-26: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 B2 (“Ryan Tseng”), 84 pages. |
| Exhibit C-27: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), 81 pages. |
| Exhibit C-28: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), 46 pages. |
| Exhibit C-29: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Yoon &Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Embedded ConductorTechnology for Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), 44 pages. |
| Exhibit C-30: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), 88 pages. |
| Exhibit C-31: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, 180 pages. |
| Exhibit C-32: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by the LG G2, 557 pages. |
| Exhibit C-33: Invalidity Contentions: 'Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the LG G3 NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The 591 Patent”) bythe LG G3, 266 pages. |
| Exhibit C-34: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, 468 pages. |
| Exhibit D-01: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Japanese PatentApplication Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), 54 pages. |
| Exhibit D-02: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kurs, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs”), 59 pages. |
| Exhibit D-03: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”), 77 pages. |
| Exhibit D-04: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), 52 pages. |
| Exhibit D-05: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Baarman, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2009/0230777A1 (“David W. Baarman”), 52 pages. |
| Exhibit D-06: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), 82 pages. |
| Exhibit D-07: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Burghartz &Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by on the Designof RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), 52 pages. |
| Exhibit D-08: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), 92 pages. |
| Exhibit D-09: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2011/084656 A1 (“Gao”), 44 pages. |
| Exhibit D-10: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Hasegawa '215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Japanese PatentApplication Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru '215”), 16 pages. |
| Exhibit D-11: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Hasegawa Michio '631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,631 A (“Hasegawa Michio '631”), 37 pages. |
| Exhibit D-12: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by J.P. PatentApplication Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), 78 pages. |
| Exhibit D-13: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by 2008/294285 A (“IshiharaKeien”), 38 pages. |
| Exhibit D-14: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 34 pages. |
| Exhibit D-15: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 39 pages. |
| Exhibit D-16: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), 50 pages. |
| Exhibit D-17: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs '765”), 57 pages. |
| Exhibit D-18: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Misumi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Japanese. PatentApplication Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misumi Shuichi”), 34 pages. |
| Exhibit D-19: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), 56 pages. |
| Exhibit D-20: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi'367”), 51 pages. |
| Exhibit D-21: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), 51 pages. |
| Exhibit D-22: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), 67 pages. |
| Exhibit D-23: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of 01 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Qi System Description,Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), 28 pages. |
| Exhibit D-24: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of QI 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. at al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Qi System Description,Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), 55 pages. |
| Exhibit D-25: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,587 a(“Hiroshi Shima”), 94 pages. |
| Exhibit D-26: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), 63pages. |
| Exhibit D-27: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 B2(“Ryan Tseng”), 75 pages. |
| Exhibit D-28: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), 73 pages. |
| Exhibit D-29: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), 42 pages. |
| Exhibit D-30: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Yoon &Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Embedded ConductorTechnology for Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), 41 pages. |
| Exhibit D-31—Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, 168 pages. |
| IPR2019-00862 Exhibit 1042—Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary injunction. |
| IPR2019-00863 Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 B2, 42 pages. |
| IPR2019-00863—Ex. 1002 Corrected Leeb Declaration, 124 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729, 90 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1001—U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729, 48 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1002—Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D., Re., in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729, 143 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1003—CV of R. Jacob Baker, 35 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004—U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, part 1, 330 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004—U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, part 2, 430 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004—U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, part 3, 230 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004—U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, part 4, 299 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex.1015—Wotherspoon—US 2007/0126544, 6 pages. |
| Machine Translation of Jang KR-20160128861-A, Year: 2020. |
| Paul A., et al., “Electro Magnetic Shielding Effectiveness of High Density Polyethylene based Composite Materials” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Apr. 2015, vol. 4(5), pp. 2184-2187. |
| PGR2019-00049—Ex. 1002—Declaration of Jacob Baker, Ph.D., P.E. In support of Petition for Post-Grant Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, 141 pages. |
| PGR2019-00049—Petition for Post-Grant Review re U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, 112 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, Part 1, 330 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, Part 2, 430 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, Part 3, 230 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, Part 4, 299 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1002 Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D., P.E. In Support of Petition for Post-Grant Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, 42 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1005 U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 to Peralta et al., 48 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1008—First Amended Complaint for NuCurrent, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Case No. 6:18-cv-00051-JRG-KNM, 62 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1009—NuCurrent's Opening Claim Construction Brief, Case. No. 1:19-CV-00798-DLC, 31 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Petition for Post-Grant Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, 73 pages. |
| Exhibit D-32: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by the LG G2, 511 pages. |
| Exhibit D-33—Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of LG G3, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by the LG G3, 249 pages. |
| Exhibit D-34—Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5,434 pages. |
| Exhibit E-01: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Ha, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The 729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2016/0149416 (“Ha”), 99 pages. |
| Exhibit E-02: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Riehl, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The 729 Patent”) by United States PatentApplication Publication 2014/0035383 (“Riehl”), 50 pages. |
| Exhibit E-03 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Baarman '154, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United StatesPatent Application Publication No. 2013/0076154 (“Baarman '154”), 42 pages. |
| Exhibit E-04: Invalidity Contentions: '729PATENT in View of Kanno, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The 729 Patent”) by United States PatentApplication Publication 2011/0241437 (“Kanno”), 30 pages. |
| Exhibit E-05: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Kazuya, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Japanese PatentApplication Publication 2013093429 (“Kazuya”), 32 pages. |
| Exhibit E-06: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Muratov, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. at al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentApplication Publication No. 2015/0357827 (“Muratov”), 35 pages. |
| Exhibit E-07: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Sung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2012/0274148 (“Sung”), 27 pages. |
| Exhibit E-08 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Kurz '635, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. at al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2015/0145635 (“Kurz '635”), 133 pages. |
| Exhibit E-09: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Kurz '634, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2015/0145635 (“Kurz '634”), 122 pages. |
| Exhibit E-10: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Lee '746, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentApplication Publication No. 2015/0137746 (“Lee 746”), 34 pages. |
| Exhibit E-11: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Mukherjee, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2015/0091502 (“Mukherjee”), 32 pages. |
| Exhibit E-12: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Asanuma, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentApplication Publication No. 2014/0197694 (“Asanuma”), 24 pages. |
| Exhibit E-13: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Takashi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2014/0008974 (“Takashi”), 77 pages. |
| Exhibit E-14: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Hoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Korean Patent Publication No. 20130015618 (“Hoon”), 28 pages. |
| Exhibit E-15 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Lee '710, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. at al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2015/0318710 (“Lee '710”), 42 pages. |
| Exhibit E-16: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Hisanori, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. at al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Japanese PatentPublication No. 2012-147408 (“Hisanori”), 45 pages. |
| Exhibit E-17: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Muratov Presentation, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Multi-ModeWireless Power Systems can be a Bridge to the Promised Land of Universal Contactless Charging, presented by Vladimir Muratov (“Muratov Presentation”), 57 pages. |
| Exhibit E-18: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Han, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2017/0353055 A1 (“Han”), 46 pages. |
| Exhibit E-19: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Riehl IEEE, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Wireless Power Systemsfor Mobile Devices Supporting Inductive and Resonant Operating Modes, by Patrick S. Riehl et al., IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 63, No. 3, Mar. 3, 2015 (Riehl IEEE), 56 pages. |
| Exhibit F-01: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Korean PatentApplication Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), 34 pages. |
| Exhibit F-02: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), 58 pages. |
| Exhibit F-03: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by WIPO Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), 30 pages. |
| Exhibit G-01: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Korean PatentApplication Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), 33 pages. |
| Exhibit G-02: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), 49 pages. |
| Exhibit G-03: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by WIPO Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), 26 pages. |
| Exhibit H-01: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by Korean PatentApplication Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), 43 pages. |
| Exhibit H-02: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), 88 pages. |
| Exhibit H-03: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by WIPO Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), 49 pages. |
| Exhibit I-01: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Korean PatentApplication Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), 39 pages. |
| Exhibit I-02: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 3atent”) by U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), 78 pages. |
| Exhibit I-03: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by WIPO Patent ApplicationPublication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), 43 pages. |
| Exhibit J-01 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Satoshi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Japanese Patentpublication No. 2001-344574 (“Satoshi”), 19 pages. |
| Exhibit J-02: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Takahashi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. at al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2007/0095913 (“Takahashi”), 23 pages. |
| Exhibit J-03: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Baarman '953, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentApplication Publication No. 2011/0259953 (“Baarman '953”), 31 pages. |
| Exhibit J-04: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Carobolante, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2015/0115727 (“Carobolante”), 12 pages. |
| Exhibit J-05: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States PatentPublication No. 2016/0156103 (“Bae”), 6 pages. |
| Exhibit J-06: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Singh, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960(“Singh”), 3 pages. |
| Exhibit J-07: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Qi 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Qi System Description,Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), 14 pages. |
| Exhibit J-08 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Narayanan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Application Note:Wireless Power Charging Coil Considerations, by Raghu Narayanan, Wurth Elektronik (“Narayanan”), 6 pages. |
| Exhibit J-09: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Barcelo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Application Note 138:Wireless Power User Guide, by Trevor Barcelo, Linear Technology (“Barcelo”), 4 pages. |
| Exhibit K: Family Patents Combinations, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.), 103 pages. |
| Exhibit L: '729 Patent Combinations, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.), 106 pages. |
| IPR2019-00858, Exhibit 1042—Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 15 pages. |
| IPR2019-00859—Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 B2, 48 pages. |
| IPR2019-00859—Ex. 1042—Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 15 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 B2, 6 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Ex. 1042, Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 15 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180233967 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62458261 | Feb 2017 | US |
