This Application is a National Phase Application of International Application PCT/DE2018/100682, filed on Aug. 2, 2018, which in turn claims priority to German Patent Applications DE 20 2017 105 001.7, filed Aug. 21, 2017 and DE 10 2017 123 878.6, filed Oct. 13, 2017, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The invention relates to a transmitting device for a LIDAR scanner which uses collimated laser radiation to scan at least one scan angle range.
In distance measurement, in which individual scan points are imaged quasi to infinity, the individual scan angle ranges have a three-dimensional extension by scanning a two-dimensional scan field or a two-dimensional extension by scanning a one-dimensional scan line.
While the extent of the scan field or scan line is limited by the maximum deflection angle of the scanning mirror, its depth is basically determined on the one hand by the Beer-Lambert law, according to which the intensity of the radiation decreases exponentially with the path of travel, and on the other hand by the required laser class, which limits the power of the radiation source.
Large scan angle ranges are of interest, for example, where a large spatial area is to be monitored without interruption. Areas of application can be e.g. aviation, shipping, military technology or autonomous driving of road vehicles.
When using a rotating mirror as a scanning mirror by which large scan angles can be covered, further discrete components such as holders in which the mirror axis is supported are required. The friction generated by the rotation leads to wear and the resulting slippage. In addition, assemblies made of discrete components are nowadays generally more complex to manufacture and therefore more expensive than monolithic assemblies. They are also less easy to miniaturize and tend to be heavier.
MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical system) mirrors, which are monolithically connected to a frame via flexure hinges, operate completely wear-free, with two flexure hinges arranged around the center of the MEMS mirror offset from each other by 180° forming an axis of rotation when viewed mechanically. There are commercially available MEMS mirrors that can only be deflected around one axis of rotation, around two axes of rotation that are perpendicular to each other, or around three or more joints that form individual suspensions. The deflection angle of the MEMS mirror relative to the frame is limited to approx. +/−10° around an undeflected zero position due to the flexure hinge connection. The frictionless operation, its high achievable operating frequency and the meanwhile comparatively low price make MEMS mirrors very attractive especially for dynamic, compact and robust devices.
When using MEMS mirrors as scanning mirrors for a transmitting device of a LIDAR scanner, however, the limited, small deflection angle is a disadvantage. The maximum scan angle range for a laser beam reflected by the MEMS mirror is four times the maximum deflection angle and is therefore no more than approx. 40°. It would be obvious to use multiple MEMS mirrors to achieve a larger combined scan angle range from the scan angle ranges of the individual MEMS mirrors or to create multiple scan angle ranges that are spaced apart. On the one hand, however, this would compromise the compactness of the device and, on the other hand, technical measures would have to be taken to synchronize the movement of the MEMS mirrors. Directing several laser beams at different angles of incidence onto a MEMS mirror instead, so that they scan several contiguous individual scan angle ranges that join together to form a large scan angle range, would have the disadvantage that a cover element placed in front of the MEMS mirror, which is known from the prior art only in the form of a planar plate, would influence the individual laser beams differently. In addition, each laser beam would require a laser beam source with a collimator arranged downstream in the beam direction, with the laser beam sources having to be aligned to each other in their beam direction so that they impinge on the MEMS mirror at certain different angles of incidence.
Regardless of whether the scanning mirror is a MEMS mirror or not, there may be reasons why the scanning mirror is enclosed in a housing and covered by a cover element and thus protected. As far as is known, the cover element is always a transparent planar plate arranged parallel or inclined to the undeflected mirror.
A laser beam impinging on the cover element, which may optionally also relate to several laser beams directed at the scanning mirror, and each of the laser beams after reflection on the scanning mirror, consequently undergoes more or less Fresnel losses, depending on the angle of incidence on the planar plate, which more or less reduce the intensity of the laser beam depending on the location. In addition, undesired reflections may occur on the cover element.
DE 10 2012 025 281 A1 discloses an optical object detection unit with a transmitting unit is known, which contains a transmitter for emitting a laser beam, a micromirror which can be pivoted about its center in one or two pivoting directions and a transmitter lens which is arranged downstream of the micromirror in the transmission beam path, covering it. The transmitter lens, designed as a meniscus lens, can also function here as a cover for a housing of the transmitting unit. A disadvantage here is that the micromirror cannot be housed on its own, since the laser beam cannot be guided towards the micromirror via the transmitter lens.
DE 10 2011 006 159 A1 discloses a projection device comprising an MEMS mirror that can be swiveled into at least two switching positions and is covered by a gradient index lens. The gradient index lens is a very positively refractive plano-convex lens or a very positively refractive meniscus, respectively, whose planar or concave surface, respectively, is arranged facing the MEMS mirror. A presumably parallel laser beam incident through the gradient index lens is focused on the MEMS mirror and, after reflection, is collimated again if necessary when passing through the gradient index lens again. One disadvantage is that the MEMS mirror, limited by the planar surface of the gradient index lens, has only a very small swivel range, and the other is that laser beams that may come from different angles of incidence do not impinge on the MEMS mirror at the same point due to refraction at the planar or concave surface, respectively, of the gradient index lens.
It is the object of the invention to find a transmitting device, comprising a scanning mirror protected by a cover element, for a LIDAR scanner, wherein only low Fresnel losses, if any, and no undesired reflections occur at the cover element. In addition, the transmitting device should have a compact design and require little adjustment in production.
The object of the invention is achieved by the features of claim 1. Advantageous embodiments are set forth in the subclaims which refer back to claim 1.
The invention will be explained in more detail below with reference to exemplary embodiments and drawings.
In the drawings:
A transmitting device according to the invention contains in all embodiments, as shown for example in
If the transmitting device contains at least two laser diodes 1.1, . . . , 1.n, they are arranged side by side in the direction of their slow axis sa, forming a row, and the beam axes A1, . . . , An are parallel to each other. Compared to an arrangement in which the beam axes enclose an angle with each other, they can thus be arranged closer together and no adjustment is required to set the angular position.
Moreover, the transmitting device contains a scanning mirror 2, which is deflectable about its center MP and is arranged in a housing 3 with a transparent cover element 4. The beam axis A1, . . . , An of the at least one laser beam S1, . . . , Sn is directed at the cover element 4 in such a way that, after passage of the at least one laser beam S1, . . . , Sn through the cover element 4 within a coupling-in region 4.1, it impinges on the center MP, and that the at least one laser beam S1, . . . , Sn, after reflection at the scanning mirror 2, passes through the cover element 4.2 again within a coupling-out region 4.2.
It is essential to the invention that the cover element 4 has a toroidal entrance surface 5.1 in the coupling-in region 4.1, for pre-collimating the at least one laser beam S1, . . . , Sn in the direction of the fast axis fa, a respective first mirror surface 5.31, . . . , 5.3n assigned to the at least two laser diodes 1.1, . . . , 1.n, for deflecting the laser beams S1, . . . , Sn to the center MP, and at least one toroidal exit surface 5.21, . . . , 5.2n, for pre-collimating the at least one laser beam S1, . . . , Sn in the direction of the slow axis sa. A toroidal surface is understood to be the surface or a section of the surface of a body that can be created geometrically by rotating a planar figure about an axis of rotation that is in the same plane as the figure itself. Such a body will also be called a toroid. Important special cases or limit cases of a toroid are torus, sphere and circular cylinder as well as cylindrical bodies with any (especially parabolic) cross-section. Surfaces and sections of surfaces of such special or limit cases are therefore also regarded as examples of toroidal surfaces. It is common practice for the person skilled in the art to slightly modify the surface for the correction of image errors.
A toroidal (refracting or reflecting) optical surface generally influences the beam shape differently in two mutually perpendicular directions. In the special or limit case of a cylindrical lens (whose cross-sectional shape need not be spherical), the beam shape remains unaffected in one direction. In the special or limit case of an ordinary spherical lens, it is influenced equally in both directions.
It is further essential to the invention that the cover element 4 is formed, at least in the coupling-out region 4.2, by a section of a monocentric hemispherical shell HK and that the cover element 4 is arranged to cover the scanning mirror 2 in such a way that the center of curvature K of the imaginary monocentric hemispherical shell HK (hereinafter referred to only as hemispherical shell HK) and the center MP of the scanning mirror 2 coincide. Monocentric means that the centers of curvature of the two surfaces of the hemispherical shell HK coincide. Manufacturing and assembly-related tolerances, long-term drifts as well as tolerance deviations between the position of the center of curvature K and the center MP lead to a deteriorating beam quality, but are tolerable within limits.
Completely independent of an angle of incidence α1, . . . , αn, at which the at least one laser beam S1, . . . , Sn impinges on the scanning mirror 42 with respect to the perpendicular L of the undeflected scanning mirror 42, the beam axis A1, . . . , An after reflection at the scanning mirror 42, regardless of its position during the deflection, always impinges perpendicularly on the section of the hemispherical shell HK formed in the coupling-out region 4.2.
As they pass through the cover element 4 within the coupling-in region 4.1, the laser beams S1, . . . , Sn impinging on the cover element are, on the one hand, deflected and, on the other hand, pre-collimated in the direction of the fast axis fa and the slow axis sa of the laser diodes 1.1, . . . , 1.n in such a way that they impinge on the center MP of the scanning mirror 2 at the same small convergence angle in the direction of the fast axis fa and the slow axis sa, and are fully collimated after passing through the cover element 4 within the coupling-out region 4.2.
Advantageously, the cover element 4 is formed by a shell 6 and an optical block 5 integrated into it as shown in
The shell 6 advantageously constitutes a part of the hemispherical shell HK.
The number of first mirror surfaces 5.31, 5.32, 5.33 present is equal to the number of laser beams S1, S2, S3 present. The first mirror surfaces 5.31, 5.32, 5.33 are planar surfaces inclined to each other, with their size and the distance between their centers as well as the angle of inclination between the adjacent planar surfaces each being determined by the distance of the laser diodes 1.1, 1.2, 1.3. While the middle one of the three laser beams, S2, is deflected only in a plane containing the fast axis fa, the outer laser beams S1, S3 are also deflected in a plane perpendicular thereto so that all three laser beams S1, S2, S3 impinge on the center MP of the scanning mirror 2. The first mirror surfaces 5.31, 5.32, 5.33 do not affect the collimation of the laser beams S1, S2, S3. Each of the first mirror surfaces 5.31, 5.32, 5.33 is assigned a toroidal exit surface 5.21, 5.22, 5.23. The toroidal exit surfaces 5.21, 5.22, 5.23 can each be a cylindrical surface and therefore collimate only in the direction of the slow axis sa, but are preferably toroidal surfaces that collimate in the slow axis sa and additionally in the fast axis fa, so that the entrance surface 5.1 can have a lower refractive power. Spherical surfaces can be advantageously provided for this purpose if the beam angle of the laser beams S1, S2, S3 in the direction of the fast axis fa has already been adapted to the beam angle in the direction of the slow axis sa by the pre-collimation of the laser beams S1, S2, S3 at the toroidal entrance surface 5.1. The pre-collimated laser beams S1, S2, S3 should be slightly convergent to then be completely collimated by the refraction in the coupling-out region 4.2, which has a negative refractive power.
The second exemplary embodiment shown in
The third exemplary embodiment shown in
The one toroidal exit surface 5.21 is in this case an aspherical cylindrical surface, with the cylinder axes of the entrance surface 5.1 and the one exit surface 5.21 being perpendicular to each other.
The shell 6 and the optical block 5 can be manufactured individually and connected to each other, preferably by gluing. However, they are advantageously manufactured monolithically from one piece.
A special case not shown in the Figures is a transmitting device with only one laser diode 1.1. There is no need here for a first mirror surface 5.31, since the one beam axis A1 of the just one laser beam S1 can be directed directly at the center MP of the scanning mirror 2. In the coupling-in region 4.1 the laser beam S1 is then guided only over the entrance surface 5.1 and one exit surface 5.21.
All embodiments of a transmitting device according to the invention have the advantage that the entire beam beam shaping for collimation and the beam deflection of the laser diode beams S1, . . . , Sn towards the scanning mirror 2 take place within the cover element 4, thus providing a compact, low-adjustment design.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2017 105 001.7 | Aug 2017 | DE | national |
10 2017 123 878.6 | Oct 2017 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2018/100682 | 8/2/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/037810 | 2/28/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6771686 | Ullman et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
8836922 | Pennecot | Sep 2014 | B1 |
9086273 | Gruver et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9618622 | Geiger | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20080123170 | Reichert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20170299721 | Eichenholz | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102914872 | Feb 2013 | CN |
102008049477 | Apr 2010 | DE |
102011006159 | Sep 2012 | DE |
102012025281 | Jun 2014 | DE |
102015110141 | Dec 2016 | DE |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report from PCT/DE2018/100682, filed Aug. 2, 2018, dated Nov. 15, 2018. |
Ito, Kota et al, System Design and Performance Characterization of a MEMS-Based Laser Scanning Time-of-Flight Sensor Based on a 256×64-pixel Single-Photon Imager, IEEE Photonics Journal, Apr. 2013, p. 6800114, vol. 5, No. 2. |
Yang, B. et al, A Compact MEMS-Based Wide-Angle Optical Scanner, Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, IEEE 2017. |
Siepmann J. P. et al., Integrable Ultra-Compact, High-Resolution, Real-Time MEMS Ladar for the Individual Soldier, LightTime, Oshkosh, WI, MILCOM, Oct. 2005, pp. 1-7 (as per International Search Report). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200355798 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |