This invention relates generally to providing a transparent and antistatic conformal coating on a circuit board or other electronic device for electrostatic discharge (ESD) mitigation purposes and, more particularly, to providing a transparent and antistatic conformal coating on a circuit board or other electronic device provided on a spacecraft for ESD mitigation purposes, where the coating includes a mixture of a transparent intrinsic conducting polymer (ICP), such as poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophere)-polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS), and a polyurethane.
Various electronics on a spacecraft are susceptible to charged particles emitted from the space environment that penetrate the spacecraft and are deposited on conductive surfaces or other objects that are not grounded, referred to herein as floating metals. These floating metals include various conductive metals, such as unused wires, metallic radiation shields, fasteners installed on insulated housings, connector back shells, etc. When the charged particles impinge a conductive element that is not grounded, the charge on the element begins to accumulate. The charged particles can charge the floating metals to thousands of volts in the space environment and are able to discharge when the breakdown voltage of the surrounding insulation is reached, referred to herein as internal electrostatic discharge (IESD). Such a discharge event can be a noise source that interferes with the operation of the electronics or can even cause destruction of the circuits in certain instances. Consequently, all floating metals must be grounded either through the proper selection of materials, physical wiring or bonding with a conductive adhesive to ground. Such design solutions have been effective, but identifying all of the floating metals on the spacecraft can be tedious and the assembly process of grounding these parts is laborious. Thus, some floating metals are often times over looked during the design process, and must be grounded after the hardware has been assembled.
It is known in the art to provide a protective coating on the various circuit boards and electronics on a spacecraft in order to protect the electronics from moisture and other environmental contaminants, where the coating may also be used to protect the circuit from internal electrostatic discharge. Known protective coatings for this purpose are often times polyurethane coatings that typically are not conductive enough to allow charge to dissipate to meet the necessary requirements. For example, it is known in the art to coat an electronic component or circuit board with a “leaky” conformal coating having a volume resistivity of 1010 ohm-cm or less. The most widely used conformal coating for space flight electronics is Arathane™ 5750, which has low vacuum out gassing. However, this coating has a very high volume resistivity of 9.3×1015 ohm-cm at room temperature and cannot be regarded as antistatic or dissipative. Further, the volume resistivity of these coatings are often times temperature dependent, where the coating may barely meet the dissipative resistance requirement when it is heated, but may not when it is in cold space. In other words, when the circuit board is in a cooler environment, such as being directed away from the sun, the resistance of the coating may increase, which may not allow it to dissipate charge to the desired requirements. It is also usually necessary that a circuit board or electronic device on a spacecraft be inspectable for various reasons, including identifying markings and indicia on the circuit board to make sure that the electric circuit is properly connected. For example, inspection of the circuit board may require that the polarity of the electric component be properly identified. Further, markings on the particular circuit board may be important, such as identification of the manufacturer, manufacturing date, etc.
It has been suggested in the art to mix a polyurethane conformal coating with a conductive metal oxide to make a circuit board coating antistatic, where the oxide to conformal coating mixture ratio is 1:1 to 5:1. In order to make the coating transparent, the reflective index of the metal oxide needs to match that of the conformal coating. As such, a complex metal oxide such as (Al, Mg, Zn)3O4 must be used. The availability of specialty tri-metallic oxides and the large volume fraction of the oxide in the conformal coating makes such a mixture less commercially viable.
It is also been proposed in the art to employ an intrinsic conducting polymer (ICP) as a coating for spacecraft electronics, such as polyaniline doped with dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid (PANI:DBSA). Only a small fraction, such as 0.5-4 weight %, of the ICP is required to make the conformal coating antistatic. However, the resulting conformal coating is not sufficiently transparent to allow inspection of the coated electronic components. In fact, when the ICP content is between 0.5-1 weight %, the cured conformal coating is translucent, and becomes opaque when the ICP content exceeds 1 weight %. Thus, this solution is typically not practical because the coating becomes non-transparent or translucent. Further, by adding more of the conductive polymer to the mixture, the mechanical properties of the coating is reduced, which reduces the mechanical integrity of the circuit board.
The following discussion of the embodiments of the invention directed to providing a transparent and conductive polymer coating on a circuit board for ESD mitigation purposes is merely exemplary in nature, and is in no way intended to limit the invention or its applications or uses. For example, the discussion herein refers to coating circuit boards and other electronics on a spacecraft. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the conformal coating may have application for circuit boards other than those on spacecraft.
As will be discussed in detail below, the present invention proposes providing a conformal coating completely enclosing the circuit board 14 that is both transparent and conductive enough to dissipate charge that may accumulate on the circuit board 14 for both hot and cold environments. As discussed above, conformal coatings are known in the art for protecting electronic components on a spacecraft. The present invention proposes making such conformal coatings suitably conductive to allow dissipation of the charge, but still be transparent, where the conductive requirements are provided by certain directives, such as NASA-HDBK-4002.
In one embodiment, the conformal coating 38 is a mixture of 1.5-2.5% PEDOT:PSS dissolved in Tuluene, which is an organic solvent, and is commercially available from Heraeus as Clevios™ HTL Solar 3, i.e., poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-complex, and a polyurethane, such as Arathane™ 5750 available from Huntsman Advanced Materials, which is a low-out gassing polyurethane. In one specific example, the coating 38 is 20 parts by weight of Clevious™ HTL Solar 3 mixed with 100 parts by weight of Part B of Arathane™ 5750 to provide a modified Part B, and 18 parts by weight of Part A of Arathane™ 5750 mixed with 120 parts by weight of the modified Part B. Other polyurethane conformal coating systems, such as Solithane™ 113, which is also a low-out gassing polyurethane, also can be employed instead of Arathane™ 5750.
In another embodiment that provides a lower volume resistivity, the coating 38 is 40 parts by weight of Clevios™ HTL Solar 3 mixed with 100 parts by weight of Part B of Arathane™ 5753 to provide a modified Part B, and 20 parts by weight of Part A of Arathane™ 5753 mixed with 140 parts by weight of the modified Part B.
The foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion and from the accompanying drawings and claims that various changes, modifications and variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5160374 | Frederickson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166864 | Chitwood et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5773150 | Tong et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6261680 | Denman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6482521 | Lee et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6600101 | Mazurkiewicz | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6663956 | Heberger et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6849800 | Mazurkiewicz | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7118693 | Glatkowski et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125479 | Sotzing | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7214889 | Mazurkiewicz | May 2007 | B2 |
7749603 | Graham et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8044150 | Ibar | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8080177 | Long | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8414801 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8748754 | Kapusta et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20020113241 | Kubota | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030193042 | Go et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050230560 | Glatkowski et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20080248311 | Suh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090074973 | Graham | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078459 | Nishizakura | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20110248223 | Zheng | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120015179 | Zheng | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120211739 | Koyama | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120313050 | Ibar | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130220514 | Jagannathan | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102731971 | Oct 2012 | CN |
Entry |
---|
NASA, “Mitigating In-Space Charging Effects—A Guideline” NASA Technical Handbook, NASA-HDBK-4002A, Mar. 3, 2011, 181 pgs. |