The present invention relates to electronic devices in general, and, more particularly, to optoelectronic devices.
A transparent conducting electrode (TCE) is an electrically conductive device that is also substantially transparent for light (typically visible light). TCEs are commonly used in many consumer optoelectronic devices, such as video displays, smart-phone screens, smart windows, etc. They are also important elements of optoelectronic devices, such as solar cells, organic light-emitting diodes, anti-static coatings, electromagnetic shielding, among others.
A TCE ideally comprises a material that simultaneously has low electrical sheet resistance (RS) and high optical transmittance (T). Historically, the most common TCEs are based on conductive oxides, such as indium tin oxide (ITO), fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO), aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO), or zinc oxide (ZnO). These materials are used to provide an electrode structure that is a substantially continuous film (often referred to as a “Type-1 TCE”). For years, the de-facto industry standard TCE material has been ITO, which has an Rs value of approximately 5 to 20 Ω/square (Ω/□) at a transmittance of approximately 90%.
Other prior-art materials that have found use in substantially continuous-film TCEs include large-area graphene and conducting polymers. TCEs based on these materials have been demonstrated with high transmittance (>90%) and sheet resistances within the ranges of 30 to 1000 Ω/□ and 100 to 450 Ω/□, respectively.
More recently, new TCE materials have been developed in an effort to reduce cost and/or increase mechanical flexibility. Much of this development has been directed toward materials based on networks of one-dimensional nanomaterials (referred to as “Type-2 TCEs”), such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene nanoribbons, metal nanowires, and nanowires of oxides and other compounds. Many of these materials have shown great promise. For example, TCEs having T>90% and low sheet resistance have been demonstrated for TCEs based on metal nanowires (RS within the range of 10 to 30 Ω/□), CNTs (RS within the range of 60 to 400 Ω/□), TiN nanofibers (RS within the range of 100 to 200 Ω/□), and oxide nanowires (Rs within the range of 2000 to 10000 Ω/□). While having a resistivity that is higher than that of ITO, these materials offer the potential for significantly reduced cost and, as a result, are still viewed as attractive alternatives to conductive oxides.
Metal nanowire TCEs, in particular, offer great promise for excellent performance due to the inherent high conductivity of metals. Various methods have been proposed to improve metal-nanowire TCE performance. For example, it is expected that transmittance can be increased by reducing light scattering, which can be effected by increasing nanowire length and/or reducing wire diameter. Unfortunately, each of these changes tends to decrease the distance over which electrons can be transported by the nanowire without incurring high ohmic loss.
Alternatively, electrical resistance can be reduced by annealing nanowire junctions via thermochemical, electrochemical, and/or nano-plasmonic welding to reduce electrical resistance at these junctions. This technique has, indeed, improved the performance of nanowire-based TCEs to the point where TCEs with RS of approximately 10 Ω/□ at T=90% have been demonstrated.
Even with the progress in the development of metal-nanowire-based TCEs, however, there remains a need for TCEs having ever better RS-T performance to enable dramatically improved performance for many optoelectronic devices.
The present invention enables a TCE having lower electrical sheet resistance than TCEs of the prior art while maintaining good optical transmittance. TCEs in accordance with the present invention include mesoscale wires that are incorporated into a TCE background medium, such as nanowires, conducting polymers or oxides, etc., such that the mesoscale wires reduce the sheet resistance of the medium without significantly reducing overall optical transparency. Embodiments of the present invention are particularly well suited for use in optoelectronic devices, such as solar cells, touch screens, displays, and the like.
An illustrative embodiment of the present invention is a TCE comprising a hierarchical arrangement of wires types, wherein each wire type has a different width and a length suitable for transporting electrons with low ohmic loss, and wherein the wires of each wire type are arranged with a wire-diameter-based, inter-wire spacing suitable for providing transparency at the operating wavelengths of light for the TCE. Specifically, the illustrative embodiment includes a wire network that includes short nanowires suitable for transporting electrons over short distances, longer macroscale wires suitable for transporting electrons over long distances, and medium-length mesoscale metal wires that provide a “bridge” for transporting electrons between the nanowires and macroscale wires. The spacing between elements of each wire type (i.e., the inter-wire spacing) is based on the width of that wire type and the wavelengths of light for which the TCE must be transparent, such that the individual arrangements of each wire type have high optical transmittance, thereby enabling high optical transmittance for the composite wire structure.
In the illustrative embodiment, the higher conductance of the mesoscale wires enables transport of electrons across several millimeters of distance, which enables a reduction in the distance the low-conductance nanowires must transport electrons to only several hundreds of microns.
In some embodiments of the present invention, mesoscale wires are incorporated into other types of transparent electrodes.
In some embodiments, the mesoscale wires are formed by depositing a metal, such as copper, onto polymer fibers that have been formed via electro-spinning.
An embodiment of the present invention is a TCE composition comprising: a background medium that includes a first material that is electrically conductive; and a plurality of mesoscale wires, each mesoscale wire of the plurality thereof comprising a second material that is electrically conductive; wherein the background medium and the plurality of mesoscale wires are electrically connected, and wherein the TCE composition has a sheet resistance that is less than or equal to 1 ohm/square and a transmittance for an optical signal that is equal to or greater than 75%.
The following terms are defined for use in this Specification, including the appended claims:
It should be noted that
The present invention enables improved TCE performance, as compared by to the prior art, by incorporating mesoscale wires into a TCE background medium. Advantages afforded embodiments of the present invention are readily perceived by comparing TCE compositions with, and without, the inclusion of mesoscale wires, as follows.
R
S=ρ(s+a)/2 ,(1)
where ρ=16.8Ω·nm.
Trace 202 shows the RS-T trend for nanowires having a wire width of 100 nm, with data points at inter-wire spacings of 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, and 5000 microns. Transmittance for the nanowire arrays is simulated using rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA), where the transmittance spectra (400-1100 nm) are weighted for the AM1.5 solar spectrum to derive the average transmittance, TAM 1.5.
Trace 204 shows the RS-T trend for mesoscale wires having a wire width of 5 microns with data points at inter-wire spacings of 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, and 5000 microns.
Trace 206 shows the RS-T trend for macroscale wires having a wire width of 50 microns with data points at inter-wire spacings of 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, and 5000 microns.
Transmittance for each of the mesoscale- and macroscale-wire arrays is simulated using geometrical shadow loss, where:
T=S/(S+a)×100%. (2)
Several inferences can be made based on plot 200, including:
It should be noted, however, that the inter-wire spacings at which macroscale wires achieve high-transmittance give rise to high sheet resistance and, therefore, will result in large ohmic losses during TCE operation. As a result, it is preferable that transportation of electrons to/from local areas in an optoelectronics device is done via small diameter wires (e.g., nanowires). On the other hand, it can be seen from traces 202 through 206 that an array containing only nanoscale wires exhibits inferior RS-T performance and would not be efficient enough to transport electrons to or from macroscale wires.
The present invention overcomes the above conflict by incorporating mesoscale wires into a TCE background medium to act as a bridge between the nanoscale wires and macroscale wires.
Traces 210 through 218 correspond to TCE compositions that include parallel mesoscale wires having widths of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 microns, respectively. The data points in each trace correspond to inter-wire spacings within the range of 100 microns to 500 microns. Data point 220 indicates the calculated sheet resistance (34 Ω/□) and transmittance (T˜98%) for the background medium alone (i.e., the arrangement of nanowires without the inclusion of any mesoscale wires).
It is readily seen from a comparison of plots 200 and 208 that combining mesoscale wires with nanoscale wires significantly improves the performance of metal-wire-based TCEs. Data point 222 of trace 218, for example, indicates that a TCE composition comprising mesoscale wires having a width of 5 microns and an inter-wire spacing of 500 microns is characterized by a sheet resistance of sheet resistance of 0.34 Ω/□ and a transmittance of 97%. Likewise, data point 224 of trace 218 indicates that a TCE composition comprising mesoscale wires having a width of 5 microns is characterized by a sheet resistance of sheet resistance of 0.07 Ω/□ and a transmittance of 93%. In other words, the inclusion of 5-micron diameter mesoscale wires in a background medium of nanowires make a TCE composition 100-1000 times more conducting at the cost of only a slight drop in transmittance.
Background medium 114 comprises a plurality of nanowires that are arranged in substantially parallel fashion. For the purposes of this Specification, including the appended claims, “substantially parallel” is defined as parallel within five degrees of parallelism. One skilled in the art will recognize that nearly perfect parallelism of photolithographically defined elements is easily achieved. In some embodiments of the present invention, however, background medium 114 includes elements formed other than photolithographically. In such embodiments, perfect parallelism is more difficult to achieve and more “generally parallel” arrangement typically results.
Nanowires 102 are gold wires having width (or diameter) within the range of approximately 1 nm to approximately 300 nm and, preferably, less than or equal to 100 nm. In TCE 100, nanowires have a width of approximately 270 nm and height of approximately 120 nm.
Nanowires 102 are formed on substrate 112 via e-beam lithography and conventional metal deposition and lift-off processing. In some embodiments, nanowires 102 are formed using another suitable conventional process, such as nanoimprinting and metal evaporation, polymer electro-spinning and metal evaporation, subtractive patterning via etching, etc.
Substrate 112 is a conventional substrate suitable for use in planar processing fabrication. Materials suitable for use in substrate 112 include, without limitation, quartz, silicon and silicon compounds, compound semiconductors, ceramics, composite materials, and the like.
Nanowires 102 are arranged in rows 110 such that, within each row, they form an array of parallel nanowires having an inter-wire spacing, s1, within the range of approximately 3 microns to 30 microns. Inter-wire spacing within this range mitigates scatter of light signal 108 by the nanowires, thereby facilitating high transmittance. In TCE 100, nanowires 102 have an exemplary inter-wire spacing of approximately 5 microns.
It should be noted that the number of rows 110, the number of nanowires per row, the width of nanowires 102, and the inter-wire spacing, s1, are all matters of design choice and can have any suitable values.
At operation 302, mesoscale wires 104 are formed. Mesoscale wires 104 are formed via conventional photolithography, metal deposition, and lift-off processing. After their formation, mesoscale wires 104 are physically and electrically connected with nanowires 102.
Mesoscale wires 104 are formed such that they are copper wires having a width within the range of approximately 1 micron to approximately 5 microns, where the height is preferably larger than the width. In the illustrative embodiment, mesoscale wires 104 have an exemplary width of approximately 5 microns and an exemplary height of approximately 2.8 microns.
Mesoscale wires 104 have an inter-wire spacing, s2, within the range of approximately 50 microns to approximately 500 microns. In the illustrative embodiment, mesoscale wires 104 have an inter-wire spacing of approximately 400 microns. In some embodiments, mesoscale wires 104 are arranged to mitigate shadowing effects.
At operation 303, mesoscale wires 104 are incorporated into background medium 114, thereby forming a joint composition in which the mesoscale wires and the background medium are electrically connected. In the illustrative embodiment, incorporation of mesoscale wires 104 occurs inherently during their fabrication. In some embodiments, additional processing, such as annealing, applying pressure (e.g., via a roll pressing operation, etc.), and the like, is included to facilitate the incorporation of mesoscale wires 104 into background medium 114.
At operation 304, macroscale wires 106 are incorporated into TCE 100. Macroscale wires 106 are formed on substrate 112 via conventional photolithography and metal deposition. After their formation, macroscale wires 106 are physically and electrically connected with mesoscale wires 104.
Each of macroscale wires 106 is a gold wire having a width that is of order tens of microns and typically about 50 microns. Macroscale wires 106 have an inter-wire spacing, s3, which is within the range of approximately 1 millimeter (mm) to approximately 5 mm. In the illustrative embodiment, macroscale wires 106 have an exemplary width of approximately 100 microns, an exemplary height of approximately 400 microns, and an exemplary inter-wire spacing of approximately 3 mm.
Nanowires 102, macroscale wires 106, and mesoscale wires 104 are incorporated and arranged such that mesoscale wires 104 provide interconnection between nanowires 102 and macroscale wires 106, thereby enabling the electrons collected and/or distributed by nanowires 102 to easily transit to and from external electronics with low ohmic loss. Preferably, mesoscale wires 104 have high electrical conductance and, therefore, large cross-sectional area; however, they should not significantly impede light transmission. As a result, in some embodiments, mesoscale wires are formed such that each has a cross-section that is defined by a height that is larger than its width (i.e., its dimensions in the z- and x-directions, respectively, as indicated in
Although in the illustrative embodiment, mesoscale wires 104 comprise copper and each of nanowires 102 and macroscale wires 106 comprises gold, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this Specification, how to specify, make, and use alternative embodiments wherein nanowires 102, macroscale wires 106, and mesoscale wires 104 comprise any suitable highly electrically conductive material. Materials suitable for use in any of nanowires 102, macroscale wires 106, and mesoscale wires 104 include, without limitation, metals (e.g., gold, copper, silver, aluminum, tungsten, zinc, nickel, etc.), and the like. In some embodiments, mesoscale wires 104 have a cross-sectional shape other than rectangular, such as circular, elliptical, square, or irregular.
It is an aspect of the present invention that the combination of mesoscale wires with nanowires and macroscopic wires enables the promotion of electron conduction over multiple length scales with minimum power loss. For example, in TCE 100, the nanowire network no longer needs to transport electrons to a several mm-long distance as in the prior-art combination of only nanowires and macroscopic metal wires. In contrast, in embodiments of the present invention, nanowires 102 need only transport electrons for several hundreds of microns because the transport of electrons across several millimeters of distance is carried out by mesoscale wires having much higher conductance.
It should be noted that an orthogonal configuration of nanowires, mesoscale wires, and macro scale wires is preferred because such an arrangement gives rise to the shortest transport path for electrons. One skilled in the art will recognize, however, after reading this Specification, that nanowires, mesoscale wires, and macro scale wires can be arranged in non-regular arrangements without departing from the scope of the present invention. In such embodiments, s1, s2, and s3 represent the average (or typical) wire spacing for their respective wire type.
Trace 502 includes data points 504 through 510, which correspond to TCE compositions having an inter-wire spacing for mesoscale wires 104 of 200, 300, 400, and 500 microns, respectively.
Data point 512 represents the RS-T performance of the array of nanowires 102, alone, which was determined to be RS=7.2 Ω/□ and T=95%, consistent with optical simulation.
Trace 502 demonstrates that 0.36 Ω/□ at T=92% can be achieved. This represents an order of magnitude improvement in RS over the prior art with little change in T. As a result, the present invention enables TCEs having performance that greatly exceeds the traditional limit of single-layer transparent electrodes.
It is another aspect of the present invention that increasing the thickness of mesoscale wires 104 does not significantly degrade the transmittance of TCE 100. For some highly conducting mesoscale wires, therefore, it is advantageous for the thickness of the mesoscale wires to be comparable to their width, thereby reducing the sheet resistance of the TCE without sacrificing transmittance.
For comparison, plot 500 includes the performance of several prior-art transparent electrodes, including silver nanowires (AgNWs), ITO compositions, graphene, and carbon nanotubes (CNTs).
Nanowires 702 are polymer nanowires that are electro-spun and aligned on the grounded collector 704.
A representative process for forming nanowires 702 begins with loading a syringe with a solution containing 14 wt % of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, M.W.=1.3×106 g/mol, Acros) and anhydrous ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.5%). The needle tip of the syringe is then electrically connected to a voltage supply that provides a +4 kV potential to the needle tip, referenced to collector 704.
Collector 704 is a grounded metal piece having an electric field applied across its two edges. The electric field aligns the electro-spun polymer nanowires across gap. In some embodiments, the two parallel edges are approximately one inch apart, although this spacing can be varied as necessary.
The distance between the syringe needle tip and the grounded collector is controlled (e.g., as 15 cm), and the polymer solution is ejected at an exemplary pump rate of approximately 0.15 ml/h to form a droplet at the needle tip.
The high electrical potential and surface charges pull polymer nanowires out of the droplet in front of the needle. The polymer nanowires are attracted toward collector 704, thereby forming free-standing nanowires that lay across the two edges of the collector. Nanowire density and spacing is controlled by controlling electro-spinning time.
It should be noted that electro-spinning enables production of polymer wires having diameters within the range of less than one hundred nanometers to a few microns. It has been also used in the prior art to produce wires of a variety of inorganic materials. It is another aspect of the present invention that prior-art electro-spinning techniques can be extended to make mesoscale wires having larger diameters.
At operation 602, copper is evaporated onto the polymer nanowires via thermal evaporation to realize copper mesoscale wires 706 having a thickness of up to 1 micron. In some embodiments, another suitable metal deposition process (e.g., e-beam evaporation, thermal evaporation, sputtering, etc.) is used to form copper mesoscale wires 706. It should be noted that forming mesoscale wires via the combination of electro-spinning and metal deposition offers a relatively inexpensive alternative to a conventional photolithography process.
At operation 603, the free-standing copper mesoscale wires 706 are transferred onto silver nanowire transparent electrode 708. Silver nanowire transparent electrode 708 is analogous to prior-art silver nanowire structures, such as those disclosed by Tao, et al., in “Langmuir-Blodgett Silver Nanowire Monolayers for Molecular Sensing Using Surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy,” Nano Letters, Vol. 3, pp. 1229-1233 (2003). A representative process for forming electrode 708 includes:
The transmittance and sheet resistance of silver electrode 708 is controlled by controlling the concentrations of the constituent chemicals, spin-coating speed, and spin-coating time.
In some embodiments, in order to transfer the mesoscale wires, alcohol is applied to silver electrode 708 to dissolve its polymer core away. This also generates capillary force that pulls the copper mesoscale wires towards the substrate as the solvent evaporates. In some embodiments, a calender machine is employed to improve the physical contact between the copper mesoscale wires and the transparent electrode.
At operation 604, the copper mesoscale wires and silver nanowire electrode are roll pressed and annealed in argon to fuse the nanowire-nanowire junctions and nanowire-mesoscale wire junctions. This facilitates creating a continuous conducting pathway and completes the formation of wire network 710.
At optional operation 605, a layer of suitable material is formed on TCE 100 to substantially planarize the surface of the electrode.
It is another aspect of the present invention that a mesoscale metal-wire composition can be incorporated into a first layer comprising other than nanowires, such as a traditional TCE composition or another film comprising a suitably electrically conductive material, to improve its RS-T performance. Materials suitable for use in such a first layer include, without limitation carbon nanotubes, ITO, AZO, Polystyrene Sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS), SnOx, conducting polymers, TiO2, ZnO, and the like.
Plot 900 demonstrates significant effectiveness of copper mesoscale wires in improving the RS-T performances of each of the different transparent electrodes.
Trace 902 shows that a composition of only copper mesoscale wires can have sheet resistance and transmittance within the range of (0.15 Ω/□, 85%) to (0.64 Ω/□, 97%). The specific values of RS-T performance within this range depends upon wire density, which is controlled by electro-spinning time.
Lines 904, 906, 908, and 910 show the improvement in RS-T performance achieved by incorporation of copper mesoscale wires in conventional TCEs comprising PEDOT:PSS, gold nanowires, AZO, and ITO, respectively. Plot 900 shows that, after incorporating copper mesoscale wires into each conventional TCE composition, the sheet resistance of each sample was improved to below 0.4 Ω/□ with less than 3% change in transmittance. Based on the shift of (RS, T) value, the average (RS, T) of electro-spun copper mesoscale wires can be calculated to be (0.40±0.05 Ω/□, 97.1±0.6%).
It should be noted that the underlying conventional TCE material and the copper mesoscale wires are in parallel configuration. As a result, with the addition of copper mesoscale wires into each TCE composition, the sheet resistance of the combined composition shifts closer to the values of copper mesoscale wires, while its transmittance is approximately the product of that of the conventional TCE material and copper mesoscale wires.
It can be seen that, for each of TCE_Composition1 and TCE_Composition2, color-state transitions lag voltage-potential changes. This is due to the kinetics of doping and undoping processes inside the electrochromic material. It is clear from plot 1000, however, that the addition of copper mesoscale wires to TCE_Composition1 significantly reduces the time required for the transparent electrode to change color.
Moreover, a lower sheet resistance results in reduced power dissipation and improved energy efficiency. In many applications, such as TCEs for large-area smart windows, the improved color-switching time and lower power dissipation afford embodiments of the present invention significant advantages over prior-art TCEs.
From the simulations and experiments described above, it is evident that the addition of mesoscale metal wire to a nanowire TCE, in accordance with the present invention, can decrease the sheet resistance of a TCE by orders of magnitude without significant negative impact on its optical transmittance. It should be also be noted that the mesoscale-wire concept disclosed herein can be applied to other types of TCEs with similar positive impact.
It is to be understood that the disclosure teaches just one example of the illustrative embodiment and that many variations of the invention can easily be devised by those skilled in the art after reading this disclosure and that the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/869977, filed Aug. 26, 2013, entitled “Transparent Conducting Electrodes Comprising Mesoscale Metal Wires,” (Attorney Docket 146-046PR1), which is incorporated by reference. If there are any contradictions or inconsistencies in language between this application and one or more of the cases that have been incorporated by reference that might affect the interpretation of the claims in this case, the claims in this case should be interpreted to be consistent with the language in this case.
This invention was made with Government support under DE-SC0001060 awarded by the department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61869977 | Aug 2013 | US |