This application is a National Stage application of PCT/IB2019/051164, filed Feb. 13, 2019, which claims the benefit of European Application No. 18156583.9, filed Feb. 13, 2018, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
The disclosure relates to electromagnetic shielding panels and assemblies containing the same, and in particular transparent electromagnetic shielding panels and assemblies and their methods of manufacture.
To meet industry or governmental regulations, microwave oven doors often have certain electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding capacity to limit electromagnetic radiation from transmission outside the microwave ovens. Conventional microwave oven doors often include a perforated metal sheet for this purpose. However, although perforated metal sheets can effectively limit microwave radiation transmission, they can also limit transmission of light visible to the human eye. As a result, a microwave oven door having a perforated metal sheet can obscure the image of a food item placed inside the oven cavity, which can be undesirable to the consumers. WO 2015/145355 discloses a method of forming a viewing panel for a microwave oven. The method includes placing a film including a conductive coating into a mold and molding a substrate to a surface of the film having the conductive coating to form the viewing panel, or injection molding a substrate and applying a conductive coating to a surface of the substrate after molding to form the viewing panel. GB2322276 discloses a microwave oven door having a metal mesh screen that reflects microwave energy back into the cooking chamber, and a microwave absorbing film spaced from the screen. JP2006170578 discloses a microwave heating device including a see-through window having a heat resistant glass and a metal slit plate with small holes. WO2018/038390 discloses a cooking appliance including a door having a shielding member woven with conductive wires and a fixing member to electrically connect the shielding member with a doorframe.
Because of the broad use of microwave oven doors, there remains a need in the art for a viewing panel having increased visible light transmittance. It would be a further advantage if the viewing panel has further enhanced electromagnetic shielding capacity.
A viewing panel (30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80) for a domestic appliance comprises a substrate (33, 43, 53, 63, 73, 83) and a conductive layer (35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85) disposed on the substrate; the conductive layer comprising conductive lines (31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81) forming a pattern. The viewing panel is characterized in that: the substrate comprises a polymeric material; the conductive lines have a height (H) of 0.5 micrometers to 10 micrometers determined by an Olympus MX61 microscope; and the pattern has an average pore area of 0.008 square millimeters to 0.06 square millimeters determined by an Olympus MX61 microscope; wherein the viewing panel has: a total transmission of greater than 70% of light having a wavelength in the range of 360 nanometers to 750 nanometers determined according to ASTM D-1003-00, Procedure A, under D65 illumination, with a 10 degrees observer, at a sample thickness of 0.15 millimeter using a Haze-Gard test device; and an electromagnetic shielding efficiency of greater than 30 dB at 2.45 GHz as determined by ASTM D4935.
An assembly for a domestic appliance is also disclosed. The assembly comprises the above-described viewing panel and a metal frame, wherein the conductive lines of the viewing panel are electrically grounded to the metal frame.
A method of forming a viewing panel (30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80) for a domestic appliance comprises: forming a conductive pattern via conductive lines (31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81) directly on a substrate (33, 43, 53, 63, 73, 83) or on a polymer film (32, 42, 52, 62) disposed on a surface of the substrate. The method characterized in that: the conductive lines have a height (H) of 0.5 micrometers to 10 micrometers determined by an Olympus MX61 microscope; the conductive pattern has an average pore area of 0.008 square millimeters to 0.06 square millimeters determined by an Olympus MX61 microscope, and the base substrate comprises a polymeric material, wherein the viewing panel has: a total transmission of greater than 70% of light having a wavelength in the range of 360 nanometers to 750 nanometers determined according to ASTM D-1003-00, Procedure A, under D65 illumination, with a 10 degrees observer, at a sample thickness of 0.15 millimeter using a Haze-Gard test device; and an electromagnetic shielding efficiency of greater than 30 dB at 2.45 GHz as determined by ASTM D4935.
A method of forming an assembly for a domestic appliance comprises forming a viewing panel in accordance with the above-described method; and integrating the viewing panel with a metal frame, the viewing panel being electrically grounded to the metal frame.
A description of the figures, which are meant to be exemplary and not limiting, is provided in which:
Viewing panels having balanced visible light transmission and electromagnetic shielding efficiency are provided. Advantageously, the viewing panels also have long-term reliability in terms of microwave radiation leakage and heat resistance. The viewing panels comprise a substrate and a conductive layer disposed on the substrate.
The conductive layer has conductive lines forming a pattern, which can be regular or irregular. Exemplary patterns include rectangular, honeycomb, hexagon, polygon, and the like. The pattern has various pores having an average pore area of 0.008 square millimeters to 0.06 square millimeters or 0.008 square millimeters to 0.04 square millimeters determined by an Olympus MX61 microscope. As used herein, a pore refer to the smallest unit formed by the conductive lines. In other words, the spaces between adjacent lines. The pore area is determined using an Olympus MX61 microscope. The inventors hereof have found that viewing panels having balanced visible light transmission and EMI shielding efficiency can be provided by tuning the size of the pores formed by the conductive lines. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that when the average pore area is more than 0.06 square millimeters, the electromagnetic shielding efficiency can be compromised. Further, without being bound by theory, it is believed that when the average pore area is less than 0.008 square millimeters, electromagnetic shielding efficiency no longer has any meaningful improvement while the transmission of visible light can be severely deteriorated.
The conductive lines comprise at least one of silver, copper, nickel, and aluminum. Preferably, the conductive lines comprise at least one of a silver alloy, a copper alloy, a nickel alloy, and an aluminum alloy. The conductive lines have a thickness or height (H) of 0.5 micrometers to 10 micrometers, measured using an Olympus MX61 microscope. The conductive lines can have a uniform width. Alternatively, the conductive lines have a width falling within two ranges, where one range is 5 to 12 microns for example, and the other range is greater than 10 millimeters. Wider lines provide better electrical contact with a metal frame when the viewing panel is incorporated into an assembly.
The conductive lines can be directly disposed on a surface of the substrate, i.e., in physical contact with the surface of the substrate. The conductive lines can also be disposed on a polymer film, which in turn is deposited on a surface of the substrate, where the conductive lines and the polymer film together form the conductive layer. The polymer film can have the same polymer material or can include different polymer materials as the substrate. In an embodiment, the polymer film contains an UV curable polymeric material.
The substrate can comprise a polymeric material such as a thermoplastic polymer, a thermoset polymer, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.
Polymeric materials are chosen based upon microwave oven door requirements such as transparency level and heat resistance. Possible polymeric materials include, but are not limited to, oligomers, polymers, ionomers, dendrimers, and copolymers such as graft copolymers, block copolymers (e.g., star block copolymers, random copolymers, and the like) or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. Examples of such polymeric materials include, but are not limited to, polyesters, polycarbonates, polystyrenes (e.g., copolymers of polycarbonate and styrene, polyphenylene ether-polystyrene blends), polyimides (e.g., polyetherimides), acrylonitrile-styrene-butadiene (ABS), polyarylates, polyalkylmethacrylates (e.g., polymethylmethacrylates (PMMA)), polyolefins (e.g., polypropylenes (PP) and polyethylenes, high density polyethylenes (HDPE), low density polyethylenes (LDPE), linear low density polyethylenes (LLDPE)), polyamides (e.g., polyamideimides), polyarylates, polysulfones (e.g., polyarylsulfones, polysulfonamides), polyphenylene sulfides, polytetrafluoroethylenes, polyethers (e.g., polyether ketones (PEK), polyether etherketones (PEEK), polyethersulfones (PES)), polyacrylics, polyacetals, polybenzoxazoles (e.g., polybenzothiazinophenothiazines, polybenzothiazoles), polyoxadiazoles, polypyrazinoquinoxalines, polypyromellitimides, polyquinoxalines, polybenzimidazoles, polyoxindoles, polyoxoisoindolines (e.g., polydioxoisoindolines), polytriazines, polypyridazines, polypiperazines, polypyridines, polypiperidines, polytriazoles, polypyrazoles, polypyrrolidones, polycarboranes, polyoxabicyclononanes, polydibenzofurans, polyphthalamide, polyacetals, polyanhydrides, polyvinyls (e.g., polyvinyl ethers, polyvinyl thioethers, polyvinyl alcohols, polyvinyl ketones, polyvinyl halides, polyvinyl nitriles, polyvinyl esters, polyvinylchlorides), polysulfonates, polysulfides, polyureas, polyphosphazenes, polysilazanes, polysiloxanes, fluoropolymers (e.g., polyvinyl fluoride (PVF), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF), fluorinated ethylene-propylene (FEP), polyethylene tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE)) or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. High heat polycarbonates, particularly high heat polycarbonate homopolymers, high heat copolycarbonates and high heat polycarbonate copolymers comprising carbonate units and ester units (also known as poly(ester carbonates)) are especially preferred for a balance of light transmission and heat resistance.
The polymeric material has a glass transition temperature that is equal to or greater than the maximum surface temperature of the substrate during a microwave operation. As used herein, a microwave operation refers to an operation of a microwave oven or an operation of a microwave and convection oven combination unit. Exemplary operations include, but are not limited to, microwave mode, grill mode, convection mode, crisp mode, or a combination thereof.
In an embodiment, the polymeric material has a glass transition temperature of 100° C. to 250° C. or 140° C. to 250° C., preferably 140° C. to 195° C., and more preferably 150° C. to 250° C. or 150° C. to 175° C., determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) as per ASTM D3418 with a 20° C./min heating rate. As used herein, high heat materials refer to materials having a glass transition temperature as defined herein. The polymeric material can also have excellent transparency. For example, the polymeric material can have a haze of less than 10%, or less than 5%, and a total transmission greater than 70% or greater than 75% of light having a wavelength in the range of 360 nanometers to 750 nanometers, each measured according to ASTM D1003-00 Procedure A, under D65 illumination, with a 10 degrees observer, at a sample thickness of 0.15 millimeter or 0.175 millimeter using a Haze-Gard test device. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the improved thermostability of the substrate under a high temperature such as 140° C.-250° C. allows the conductive layer to have a reduced height since there is a less demanding need to dissipate the heat generated during a microwave operation.
In an embodiment the substrate comprises transparent and high heat phthalimidine copolycarbonates having bisphenol A carbonate units and phthalimidine carbonate units of formula (1)
wherein Ra and Rb are each independently a C1-12 alkyl, C2-12 alkenyl, C3-8 cycloalkyl, or C1-12 alkoxy, preferably a C1-3 alkyl, each R3 is independently a C1-6 alkyl, R4 is hydrogen, C1-6 or C2-6 alkyl or phenyl optionally substituted with 1 to 5 C1-6 alkyl groups, and p and q are each independently 0 to 4, preferably 0 to 1. For example, the phthalimidine carbonate units can be of formula (1a)
wherein R5 is hydrogen, phenyl optionally substituted with up to five C1-6 alkyl groups, or C1-4 alkyl, such as methyl or C2-4 alkyl. In an embodiment, R5 is hydrogen or phenyl, preferably phenyl. Carbonate units (1a) wherein R5 is phenyl can be derived from 2-phenyl-3,3′-bis(4-hydroxy phenyl)phthalimidine (also known as 3,3-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenylisoindolin-1-one or N-phenyl phenolphthalein bisphenol or “PPPBP”). Bisphenol A carbonate units have formula (2).
The phthalimidine copolycarbonate comprises 15 to 90 mole percent (mol %) of the bisphenol A carbonate units and 10 to 85 mol % of the phthalimidine carbonate units, preferably the copolycarbonate comprises from 50 to 90 mol % of the bisphenol A carbonate units and 10 to 50 mol % of the phthalimidine carbonate units, and more preferably the copolycarbonate comprises from 50 to 70 mol % of the bisphenol A carbonate units, 30 to 50 mol % of the phthalimidine carbonate units, or 60 to 70 mol % of the bisphenol A carbonate units and 30 to 40 mol % of the phthalimidine carbonate units, each based on the total number of carbonate units in the phthalimidine copolycarbonate. Optionally the phthalimidine copolycarbonate is blended with a bisphenol A homopolycarbonate.
A combination of glass and polymeric material can be used. For example, the substrate can be a glass laminated with a film comprising the polymeric material.
The polymeric substrate can include various additives ordinarily incorporated into polymer compositions of this type, with the proviso that the additive(s) are selected to not adversely affect the desired properties of the polymer, in particular, transparency, deflection, stress, and flexural stiffness. Such additives can be mixed at a suitable time during the mixing of the components for forming the substrate and/or film. Exemplary additives include impact modifiers, fillers, reinforcing agents, antioxidants, heat stabilizers, light stabilizers, ultraviolet (UV) light stabilizers, plasticizers, lubricants, mold release agents, antistatic agents, colorants (such as carbon black and organic dyes), surface effect additives, radiation stabilizers (e.g., infrared absorbing), flame retardants, and anti-drip agents. A combination of additives can be used, for example, a combination of a heat stabilizer, mold release agent, and ultraviolet light stabilizer. The total amount of additives (other than any impact modifier, filler, or reinforcing agents) can be 0.001 weight percent (wt %) to 5 wt %, based on the total weight of the composition of the substrate and/or film.
The substrate can be a sheet, film, or a molded part. The perimeter shape of the substrate can be any shape, e.g., circular, elliptical, or the shape of a polygon having straight or curved edges. The thickness of the substrate can vary. In an embodiment, the substrate has a thickness of equal to or greater than 0.1 millimeter, for example, from 0.1 millimeter to 5 millimeters, from 0.1 millimeter to 2 millimeters, from 0.1 to 1 millimeter, or from 0.1 millimeter to 0.8 millimeter.
Exemplary viewing panels are illustrated in
The viewing panels can be manufactured by forming a conductive pattern directly on a substrate or on a polymer film disposed on a surface of the substrate. The substrate can be formed by an extrusion, calendaring, molding (e.g., injection molding), thermoforming, vacuum forming, or other desirable forming process. The substrate can be made as a flat sheet. The substrate can be formed with curvature.
The conductive lines (e.g., conductive metal nanoparticle layers) can be applied to a substrate or a polymer film by several techniques, including, printing of conductive inks (e.g., imprinting, silk screen printing, flexographic, screen printing, inkjet, gravure offset, reverse offset printing, and photolithography), coating and patterning of e.g., silver halide emulsions which can be reduced to silver particles, and self-assembly of silver nanoparticle dispersions or emulsions. The polymer film, if present, can be laminated to the substrate either before the conductive lines are disposed on the polymer film or after the conductive lines are disposed on the polymer film.
The viewing panels as disclosed herein can have excellent transparency. In an embodiment, the viewing panels have a total transmission of greater than 70% of light having a wavelength in the range of 360 nanometers to 750 nanometers determined according to ASTM D-1003-00, Procedure A, under D65 illumination, with a 10 degrees observer, at a thickness of 0.15 millimeter or 0.175 millimeter using a Haze-Gard test device. The viewing panels can have a haze of less than 10% determined according to ASTM D-1003-00, Procedure A, under D65 illumination, with a 10 degrees observer, at a thickness of 0.15 millimeter or 0.175 millimeter using a Haze-Gard test device.
The viewing panels can also have excellent electromagnetic shielding efficiency. In an embodiment, the viewing panels have an electromagnetic shielding efficiency of greater than 30 decibel (dB) at 2.45 gigahertz (GHz) as determined by ASTM D4935. The viewing panel can also have an electromagnetic leakage of less than 1.0 milliWatt per square centimeter (mW/cm2) at 2.45 GHz under loading conditions as defined in Underwriters Laboratories standard 923 (UL923).
The viewing panels have a low surface resistance. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that low surface resistance contributes to improved electromagnetic shielding efficiency. In an embodiment, the viewing panels have a surface resistance of less than or equal to 1.0 ohm per square (ohm/sq).
The viewing panels can be integrated with a metal frame to provide an assembly for a domestic appliance. In the assembly, the conductive lines of the viewing panel are electrically grounded to the metal frame. The percentage of grounding contact area can vary depending on the size of the assembly, in particular, the size of the viewing panel.
The electrical connection between the conductive lines and metal frame can be accomplished by various techniques, including, but not limited to conductive inks or pastes, conductive tape such as copper tape, soldered connections, conductive adhesives, or direct electrical contact. One end of the connection can be attached to the metal frame, while the other end of the connection can be attached to the conductive lines. The electrical attachment to the conductive lines can be done at multiple locations or even continuously around the perimeters to provide sufficient connection to all parts of the conductive pattern. The conductive lines that are in direct electrical contact with the metal frame or in direct electrical contact with the conductive adhesive have a width of greater than 10 millimeters. In an embodiment, the total contact area between the conductive lines and the metal frame is more than 15% of the surface area of the substrate. Larger contact area leads to better shielding performance as well as stronger adhesion between the viewing panel and the metal frame. The maximum total contact area between the conductive lines and the metal frame can be adjusted based on the desired size of the viewing panel.
The metal frame can abut a perimeter edge of the viewing panel. The metal frame can extend along a portion of the perimeter of the viewing panel. The metal frame can also extend along the entire perimeter of the viewing panel such that it surrounds the viewing panel.
In
In assembly 400 shown in
Additional layers can be included in the assembly if desired. The assembly can further comprise a first protective layer disposed on the conductive lines, or a second protective layer disposed on a surface of the substrate, or a combination thereof. The protective layer can provide an underlying layer with resistance to abrasion, ultraviolet radiation, microbes, bacteria, corrosion, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. In an embodiment, the protective layer is a glass layer.
The conductive pattern can be placed on the outside or inside of the assembly. When the conductive pattern is included in the assembly of a domestic appliance, the pattern can be placed as a layer within a multilayer window, such as being sandwiched between two or more transparent substrates providing protection for the conductive network.
As shown in
The assembly can be a microwave oven door or a door for a microwave and convection oven combination unit.
The viewing panels and assemblies having balanced light transmission and electromagnetic shielding effectiveness are further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.
Various viewing panels were constructed. Each of the panels has a substrate and conductive lines printed on the substrate. The conductive lines form a pattern having pores of various sizes. The materials of the substrate and the lines as well as the microscope images of the patterns produced are shown in Table 1. The transmittance, surface resistance, and the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of the panels were evaluated.
As used herein, “transmittance” refers to a total transmission of light at a wavelength in the range of 360 nanometers to 750 nanometers, as measured in accordance with ASTM D-1003-00, Procedure A, under D65 illumination, with a 10 degrees observer, at a thickness of the panel as set forth in Table 1 using a Haze-Gard test device.
The surface resistance was determined in accordance with ASTM D257.
The electromagnetic shielding effectiveness was measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard test D4935 at 2.45 GHz.
The pore area is an average pore area, measured by an Olympus MX 61 microscope.
The testing results are summarized in Table 1. The shielding effectiveness results are also depicted in
The results indicate that the pore area of the pattern has a significant effect on the electromagnetic shielding performance. Smaller pores result in better shielding effectiveness. For example, panels having a pore area of 0.01 mm2 (Ex2) can have a shielding effectiveness close to that of the original metal frame of a microwave oven door.
The results also show that the pore area of the pattern has an effect on the transparency of the panels. Comparing Ex 3 with Ex 4, a panel having a pattern with a pore area of 0.01 to 0.02 mm2 (Ex 3) has a transmittance of 80%, and when the pore area is increased to 0.03 to 0.05 mm2 (Ex 4), the transmittance is improved to 85%. However, when the pore area reaches a certain value, further increasing the pore area does not increase the transmittance any more. In addition, increasing the pore area can lead to significant reduction in shielding effectiveness. Comparing Ex 4 with Ex 5, the pore area is increased almost 10 times from 0.03-0.05 mm2 (Ex 4) to 0.4-0.5 mm2 (Ex 5), yet the transmittance remains the same at 85%. Meanwhile, the shielding effectiveness at 2.45 GHz is significantly reduced from 39.95 dB (Ex 4) to 28.65 dB (Ex 5).
Examples 6 and 7 demonstrate the shielding effectiveness of viewing panels having a PC substrate (2-phenyl-3,3′-bis(4-hydroxy phenyl)phthalimidine—bisphenol A polycarbonate copolymer) with various thicknesses.
Viewing panels similar to that of Ex 2 except for having a PC substrate (2-phenyl-3,3′-bis(4-hydroxy phenyl)phthalimidine—bisphenol A polycarbonate copolymer) with a thickness of 0.25 mm or 0.5 mm respectively were constructed and evaluated for shielding effectiveness at 2.45 GHz. The results are shown in Table 2.
Example 8 evaluates the electromagnetic leakage of a viewing panel having a PC substrate (2-phenyl-3,3′-bis(4-hydroxy phenyl)phthalimidine—bisphenol A polycarbonate copolymer) under loading conditions.
The panel similar to that of Ex 7 was joined to a metal frame forming an assembly. The assembly was attached to a microwave oven door. The microwave oven used in the example was manufactured by LG, Model #MJ324SWT with a volume of 32 L and a power of 900 Watts.
A beaker with 900 milliliters (mL) of tap water was placed inside the microwave oven. The microwave oven was run at a microwave mode for 30 minutes, and then cooled down for 30 minutes. Next, the microwave oven was run at a microwave mode for 4 minutes under unloading conditions then cooled down for 4 minutes. Then the microwave oven was run at convection mode for 60 minutes under loading conditions and cooled down for 60 minutes. A probe was set in front of the microwave oven door to measure the radiation emission. The cycle was repeated. The electromagnetic leakage measured as power density versus loading cycle was depicted in
Example 9 evaluates the electromagnetic leakage of a viewing panel having a PC substrate (2-phenyl-3,3′-bis(4-hydroxy phenyl)phthalimidine—bisphenol A polycarbonate copolymer) under loading or unloading conditions.
A panel of Ex. 8 was joined to a metal frame forming an assembly. The assembly was attached to a microwave oven door. The microwave oven used in the example was manufactured by LG, Model #MJ324SWT with a volume of 32 L and a power of 900 Watts.
The microwave oven was run for four minutes under unloading condition at the microwave mode. A probe was set in front of the microwave oven door. The electromagnetic leakage was measured every five cycles as power density. The power density versus unloading cycle was depicted in
A beaker with 2 L of tap water was placed inside the microwave oven. The microwave oven was run at a microwave mode for 60 minutes, and then cooled down for 30 minutes. A probe was set in front of the microwave oven door to measure the radiation emission. The cycle was repeated. The electromagnetic leakage was measured as power density. Power density versus loading cycle was depicted in
Example 10 evaluates the heat resistance of the viewing panels according to the disclosure.
The assembly of Ex. 9 was attached to a microwave oven door. The microwave oven was run at different modes to measure the actual surface temperature that the viewing panel was exposed to through a thermocouple. Set temperatures of dry oven for an extended period of time as shown in Table 3 were determined. There is no film detachment or any deformation on the surface of the viewing panel after a total of 600 hours of testing. The results show that the viewing panels according to the disclosure have excellent heat resistance.
The viewing panel also has an electromagnetic leakage below 1.0 mW/cm2 at 2.45 GHz under loading conditions as defined in UL 923. The result shows that the panel also have excellent microwave shielding reliability.
Set forth are various aspects of the disclosure.
The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. “Or” means “and/or” unless clearly indicated otherwise by context. Unless defined otherwise, technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one of skill in the art to which this invention belongs. A “combination” is inclusive of blends, mixtures, alloys, reaction products, and the like. “One or more of the foregoing” means at least one the listed material.
Unless otherwise specified herein, any reference to standards, regulations, testing methods and the like refers to the standard, regulation, guidance or method that is in force at the time of filing of the present application.
As used herein, glass transition temperature is determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) as per ASTM D3418 with a 20° C./min heating rate.
All cited patents, patent applications, and other references are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. However, if a term in the present application contradicts or conflicts with a term in the incorporated reference, the term from the present application takes precedence over the conflicting term from the incorporated reference.
While typical embodiments have been set forth for the purpose of illustration, the foregoing descriptions should not be deemed a limitation on the scope herein. Accordingly, various modifications, adaptations, and alternatives can occur to one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
18156583 | Feb 2018 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2019/051164 | 2/13/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/159078 | 8/22/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5863673 | Campbell | Jan 1999 | A |
6822208 | Henze | Nov 2004 | B2 |
8502125 | Danzer et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8772687 | Boxman et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8908267 | Mccarthy et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20180220501 | Jung | Aug 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201383886 | Jan 2010 | CN |
204987134 | Jan 2016 | CN |
2322276 | Aug 1998 | GB |
H02253509 | Oct 1990 | JP |
H07122359 | May 1995 | JP |
2000208249 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2006170578 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2015145355 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2016144312 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2017187425 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018038390 | Mar 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Boxman et al., “Clear etalon windows for domestic microwave ovens: Analysis and measurement”, Microwave and RF Power Applications: Proceeding of the 13th International Conference on Microwave and Radio Frequency Heating, AMPERE, 2011, 5 pages. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 18156583.9 dated Jul. 20, 2018, 8 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/IB2019/051164, International Filing Date Feb. 13, 2019, dated May 27, 2019, 3 pages. |
Murugan et al., “Dual Frequency Selective Transparent Front Doors for Microwave Oven with Different Opening Areas”, Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters, vol. 52, 2015, pp. 11-16. |
Rubinger et al., “Microwave shielding of fluorine-doped tin oxide film obtained by spray pyrolysis studied by electrical characterization”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105, 2009, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/IB2019/051164, International Filing Date Feb. 13, 2019, dated May 27, 2019, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210051774 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |