Applicants hereby claim priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a) to European Patent Application No. EP 05 011 427.1, filed May 27, 2005 and European Patent Application EP 05 015 072.1, filed Jul. 12, 2005, the disclosures of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The invention relates to a transparent light-emitting component, in particular an organic light-emitting diode (OLED).
Organic light-emitting diodes have undergone a very rapid development in recent times. Even though they were developed for the first time in 1987 for vapor-deposited organic materials (cf. Tang et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 (12), 913 (1978)) for deposited polymer materials from liquid solution (cf. J. H. Burroughes et al., Nature 347, 6293 (1990)), excellent parameters for the efficiency and life service duration of organic light-emitting diodes were already achieved in recent years. In particular, efficiencies of over 80 lumen/w were successfully obtained for green-emitting light-emitting diodes (cf. He et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3911 (2004)). Comparably good values were already achieved also for red-emitting and blue-emitting organic light-emitting diodes.
As also the lifetime of these systems has grown very quickly and, in the meantime, values of 10,000 hours for some material systems have even been significantly exceeded, organic light-emitting diodes also appear interesting for applications in lighting systems. The essential advantages of the organic light-emitting diodes, in addition to the possible high efficiency, which even today exceeds that of incandescent bulbs and will in future possibly reach the efficiency of fluorescent tubes, are the possibility of realizing a large-surface lighting unit through which a very glare-free and for many applications ideally suitable light can be generated.
The conventional structural arrangement of organic light-emitting diodes comprises a transparent substrate, glass in most cases, which is coated with a transparent anode that is frequently formed from indium tin oxide (ITO). Onto this, active organic layers are deposited and, subsequently and additionally, a metallic cathode for electrical contacting is deposited. If some volts are applied between the metallic cathode and the transparent anode, the light-emitting diode emits the light through the substrate.
There are also technical concepts that allow the construction of light-emitting diodes, which are at least partially transparent. For this purpose, for example, the cathode can also be provided with a transparent conductive metal or with a thin and partially transparent metal layer (cf. Gu et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2606 (1996); Parthasaray et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2128 (2000)). In the arrangements proposed up to now, the light of the light-emitting diode is then emitted in both directions, where the exact ratio of the light volumes radiated in both directions depends on the structural configuration of the layer arrangement. This is useable for some applications, for example displays, which are to be read from both sides.
However, it is frequently disadvantageous if a transparent light-emitting diode emits to both sides. On the other hand, it would be very favorable if it were possible to realize organic light-emitting diodes, which are transparent and at the same time emit with significant preference in one direction. With regard to the initial concepts known from the literature, the light intensities in both directions are approximately equal (cf. Gu et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2606 (1996); Parthasaray et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2128 (2000)).
The object of the invention is to create a transparent light-emitting component, which is better and more suitable for lighting purposes.
This object is solved by a transparent light-emitting component according to claim 1. Advantageous embodiments of the invention are subject-matter of dependent Sub-Claims.
According to the invention a transparent light-emitting component is created, in particular an organic light-emitting diode (OLED), with a layer arrangement in which a light-emitting organic layer is arranged between an upper and a lower electrode, the layer arrangement being transparent in a switched-off state and emitting light, which is produced in the light-emitting organic layer by applying an electric voltage to the upper and the lower electrode in a switched-on state and which is radiated, which light is radiated in a ratio of at least approximately 4:1 through the upper or the lower electrode, and in which a stack, which is transparent in the visible spectral region and of dielectric layers, being arranged on the side of the upper or the lower electrode.
With the help of the invention it is made possible to achieve, on the one hand and in the switched-off condition of the light-emitting component, a high optical transparency in the visible spectral region. On the other hand, the component in the switched-on condition can emit white or also colored light preferentially in one direction where a ratio of approximately 4:1 is achieved or exceeded. For the component as proposed, an integration of a light-emitting layer arrangement involving preferably an organic light-emitting diode is envisaged with a stack of dielectric layers. With the help of this arrangement, the wavelengths of the light generated in the light-emitting organic layer are emitted preferably in one direction.
The stack of dielectric layers in one embodiment is arranged in such a way that, in one limited spectral region, which overlaps at least partially with the emission spectrum of the light produced in the light-emitting organic layer, there is a high reflection power (>90%), where a reflection power of >99% can be formed with several layers. In this way a substantial part of the light produced in the light emitting organic layer, which on its part can be formed as a layer sequence, emits only in one direction, therefore preferably through the upper or the lower electrode.
At the same time the transmission of the component in the entire visible spectral region is very high. This can be achieved, for example, in that the stack of dielectric layers is designed in such a way that the reflection band is so narrow that only the essential parts of the emission of the light-emitting organic layers are reflected. The design of the stack of dielectric layers can in this way, in addition to the λ/4-layers, which are used in the most plain form of such a reflecting arrangement, also contain multiples of this thickness for one or both partial components of the layer stack, through which the spectral reflection width is reduced (cf. Macleod, Thin Film Optical Filters, 3rd ed., IOP Publishing 2001). In order to obtain a highest possible transmission, the layer thickness of the normally used transparent contact material indium tin oxide (ITO) is optimized; calculations show, for example, that this is the case for the layer thickness λ/4.
The arrangement proposed here can also be advantageously extended in this embodiment to that extent that the stack of dielectric layers preferentially reflects not only one wavelength but rather that several narrow wavelength sectors are reflected. This can be achieved either by means of the sequential separation of several stacks with various thicknesses of the individual layers or by means of utilization of the higher orders of reflection of a plain layer stack. In this way, it is also possible, for example, to realize a white-emitting transparent organic light-emitting diode as well.
In a further embodiment the dielectric layers are used with a thickness of λ/4 and modulated or continually varied refractive index profile, the so-called rugate filter. With a suitable design, these provide the advantage of the suppression of the reflection bands occurring with conventional Bragg mirrors outside of the range of the co-targeted high reflection. The use of such a dielectric filter enables the reflection in the desired spectral range with an efficiency of >99% and a likewise very high transparency (>90%) in the other sectors of the visual spectrum.
The principle as proposed here is usable on a very general scale and is, for example, independent of the exact nature of the layer arrangement. For example, it is usable both for layer arrangements deposited from the solution as well as for layer arrangements vapor-deposited in the vacuum. Furthermore, it can also be used for organic light-emitting diodes if these are monolithically integrated in a stack consisting of one or several diodes. The radiated light in this case is produced with the help of several organic light-emitting diodes,
The invention is explained in greater detail on the basis of embodiment examples with reference to the Figures of a drawing.
These Figures show the following:
a and 3b: a transmission spectrum and a refractive index distribution for a further embodiment of a layer arrangement according to
An advantageous embodiment of a layer arrangement according to
The layers numbered 4 to 6 form in turn the organic area 5 (cf.
For the realization of a transparent organic light-emitting diode that emits in two or three wavelength ranges, several stacks of dielectric layers each having an individual single layer thickness of λ/4 can be placed one on top of the other. In this way spectral bands are reflected in each case and, in the superimposition, give the desired spectrum of the emitted light.
There is a further option in the use of higher orders of a periodic stack of dielectric layers. With a λ/4-arrangement, these higher orders lie in each case at the half wavelength of the next lowest order. For this reason, a superimposition of several bands could hardly be attained in this way within the visible spectral range. However, if pluralities of λ/4-layer thicknesses are used for the longest wavelength to be superimposed, several spectral regions within the visible light can be superimposed in this way from a stack of dielectric layers with uniform layer thicknesses.
A preferred embodiment example shows the transmission spectrums illustrated in
The layers numbered 4 to 6 again form the organic area.
A further preferred embodiment example has the following structural configuration:
a shows the transmission behavior for the further embodiment example without consideration of the encapsulation. The stack of dielectric layers comprises 54 layers with, in part, sinus-shaped modulated refractive index and is constructed for a maximum reflection wavelength of 550 nm.
b shows a varying refractive index distribution in the stack of dielectric layers, one of the varying refractive indices being allocated to each dielectric layer in the stack. There is a 77 nm thick layer ITO on the stack of dielectric layers. The entire is thickness of the organic layers is 162 nm, that of the 7 th layer (transparent electrode) 100 nm. This construction enables a high reflection of around 550 nm with an overall transmission of >80%.
It is also possible to envisage a sequence of adjacent layers with continually increasing/decreasing refractive index in at least one partial stack of the stack of dielectric layers. This increase/decrease can be achieved in particular by means of a variation of the layer thickness of the individual layers of the partial stack. Oscillating auxiliary maxima of the stop bands, which are disturbing here, can be suppressed in this way.
The features of the invention as disclosed in this description, in the claims and in the drawing can be of significance both individually as well as in random combination for the realization of the invention in its various embodiment forms.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
05011427 | May 2005 | EP | regional |
05015072 | Jul 2005 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3644770 | Bell | Feb 1972 | A |
3673011 | Strull | Jun 1972 | A |
3913999 | Clarke | Oct 1975 | A |
4066569 | Lim | Jan 1978 | A |
4356429 | Tang | Oct 1982 | A |
4618453 | Kim | Oct 1986 | A |
4769292 | Tang et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5093698 | Egusa | Mar 1992 | A |
5110835 | Walter et al. | May 1992 | A |
5247226 | Sato et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5292881 | Berneth et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5556524 | Albers | Sep 1996 | A |
5703436 | Forrest et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5736881 | Ortiz | Apr 1998 | A |
5757026 | Forrest et al. | May 1998 | A |
5811833 | Thompson | Sep 1998 | A |
5834893 | Bulovic et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840217 | Lupo et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5969474 | Aria | Oct 1999 | A |
6013384 | Kido et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6046543 | Bulovic et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6111696 | Allen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6160828 | Kozlov et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6303238 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310360 | Forrest et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6350534 | Boerner et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6406804 | Higashi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414661 | Shen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423429 | Kido et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6437769 | Kohayashi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6476550 | Oda | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501230 | Feldman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6555840 | Hudson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6566807 | Fujita et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573651 | Adachi et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579422 | Kasinuma | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6614161 | Jacobsen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6620528 | Yamazaki | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630684 | Lee | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645645 | Adachi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6700058 | Nelles et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720573 | Son | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734457 | Yamazaki | May 2004 | B2 |
6747287 | Toguchi et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6809333 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6835470 | Magain | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6837939 | Klug | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6867538 | Adachi | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878297 | Berger et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6897473 | Burroughes et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6900588 | Adachi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6933522 | Lin | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6965197 | Tyan | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7001536 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012363 | Weaver | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7074500 | Pleiffer | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7141817 | Nishi | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7161292 | Leo | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7256541 | Birnstock | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7345300 | Qin | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20010026124 | Liu et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010035713 | Kimusra | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010038102 | Kawase | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010055841 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020015807 | Sugino et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020084993 | Teneya | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098379 | Arakane | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030020073 | Long et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030062636 | Chen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030085652 | Weaver et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030122813 | Ishizuki | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030127973 | Weaver et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146443 | Tokuda et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030146888 | Yamazaki | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164679 | Hamano et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184505 | Inukai | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030186080 | Kamatani et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040012980 | Sigiura et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040033388 | Kim et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040065544 | Igarashi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066824 | Magno et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069995 | Magno et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070558 | Cok | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040113547 | Son | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040183963 | Nakamura | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040227446 | Fujimoto et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251816 | Leo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262576 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050040390 | Pleiffer et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041293 | Wada et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050072971 | Marrocco et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050110009 | Blochwitz-Nimoth et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050142379 | Juni et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145179 | Catteneo | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050179399 | Leo | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050236973 | Leo et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050280766 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060033115 | Blochwitz et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038170 | Brunschwiler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060044227 | Hadcock | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060049397 | Pfeiffer | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060050032 | Gunner et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071206 | Stossell et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079004 | Werner | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060214888 | Schneider | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231843 | Qin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250076 | Hofmann | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273310 | Birnstock | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279227 | Burqhart | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070035236 | Murano | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070051946 | Walzer | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070145355 | Werner | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070252140 | Limmert | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278479 | Werner et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080048557 | Birnstock | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080121870 | Seth et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080143250 | Blochwitz-Nimoth | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080164807 | Hofmann | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080203406 | He | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003229476 | Sep 2003 | AU |
2463377 | Aug 2003 | CA |
19732828 | Feb 1999 | DE |
19916745 | Oct 2000 | DE |
10009204 | Aug 2001 | DE |
10135513 | Feb 2003 | DE |
10207859 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10229231 | Jan 2004 | DE |
10251986 | May 2004 | DE |
10261609 | Aug 2004 | DE |
10307125 | Aug 2004 | DE |
0625843 | Nov 1994 | EP |
1018718 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1227466 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1282101 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1318499 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1365633 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1476881 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1548856 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1435761 | May 2006 | EP |
239203 | Feb 1926 | GB |
2361356 | Oct 2001 | GB |
2388236 | Nov 2003 | GB |
2390215 | Dec 2003 | GB |
59031865 | Feb 1984 | JP |
7057873 | Mar 1995 | JP |
2002 216975 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2004119197 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004235168 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005108672 | Apr 2005 | JP |
200306437 | Nov 2003 | TW |
1226499 | Jan 2005 | TW |
9619792 | Jun 1996 | WO |
9828767 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9948160 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0076008 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0108230 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0127910 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0193642 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0237580 | May 2002 | WO |
0241414 | May 2002 | WO |
02093664 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03061028 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03069958 | Aug 2003 | WO |
03070822 | Aug 2003 | WO |
03088271 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03094140 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004004421 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004025615 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004059606 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005051525 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005086251 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060284170 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |