Transparent soap composition

Abstract

A transparent soap composition, consisting essentially of(a) over 50% by weight of a complex mixture of the sodium and triethanolamine salts of a fatty acid or acids having from 6 to 18 carbon atoms and an iodine value of 8-15,(b) between 0.2 and 1.0 weight percent of a member or members selected from the group consisting of citric acid, sodium citrate and potassium citrate,(c) between 0.2 and 0.1 weight percent of a member or members selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, sodium sulfite, sodium bisulfite, potassium bisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, potassium hydrosulfite and potassium sulfite, and potassium metabisulfite,(d) water.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to soap compositions, and more particularly to bar soap compositions characterized by transparency retention for long time intervals.

Transparent bar soap is a highly desirable and commercially attractive product; however, such soaps have in the past been unable to retain desired transparency due to progressive darkening with age, as for example, six months to three or four years.

It is a major object of the present invention to provide a highly desirable soap composition which does not lose its transparency, or otherwise darken, over extended time periods.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In accordance with the invention, the addition of small weight percentages of sodium metabisulfite and citric acid to a soap composition consisting of a complex mixture of sodium and triethanolamine salts of a fatty acid or acids having from 6 to 18 carbon atoms and an iodine value of 8-15, results in maintenance of long term transparency of the soap (for example in solid bar configuration). More specifically, between 0.2 and 1.0 weight percent of a member or members selected from the group consisting of citric acid, sodium citrate and potassium citrate is added to the soap mix; and between 0.2 ad 1.0 weight percent of a member or members selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, sodium sulfite, sodium bisulfite, potassium bisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, potassium metabisulfite and potassium sulfite is also added to the mix.

Examples of the soap compositions are embodied in the following, wherein above range and below range soap characteristics are also listed;

TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________ Range OptimumIngredients (wt. %) Above Range Below Range (wt. %)__________________________________________________________________________Triethanolamine 30-35% Hard, clear Soft, opaque 30.2%Coconut fatty 18-22 Hard, hazy Hard, very sl. 20.2acid hazyStearic acid 15-21 Hard, opaque Hard, hazy 20.2Sodium hydroxide 4.5-6.5 Sl. soft, hazy Hard, hazy 4.55Glycerine 10-16 Hard, clear Hard, very 12.1 sl. hazy50% gluconic acid about 0.2 0.2Sodium metabisulfite about 0.5 0.5Citric acid 0.5Perfume 1.0Deionized water 10.55__________________________________________________________________________

The actual soap portion of the formula consists of a complex mixture of the sodium and triethanolamine salts of coconut fatty acid and stearic fatty acid. Coconut fatty acid has the approximate composition of 5% caprylic acid, 4% capric acid, 52% lauric acid, 19% myristic acid, 9.5% palmitic acid, 2.5% stearic acid, 7% oleic acid and 1% linoleic acid. Other properties are a titre of 22.degree.-26.degree. C., an iodine value of 8-15, an acid value of 258-270 and a saponification value of 260-272. Stripped coconut fatty acid having less than 1% capric acid, 55% lauric acid, 24% myristic acid, 12.5% palmitic acid, 1.5% stearic acid, 5% oleic acid, and 1% linoleic acid is also usable.

Stearic acid used has the approximate composition 2.5% myristic acid, 0.5% pentadecanoic acid, 50% palmitic acid, 2% margaric acid, 35% stearic acid, 9% oleic acid and 1% linoleic acid. This is further characterized by a titre of 52.8.degree.-53.5.degree. C., an iodine value of 8-12, an acid value of 205-210 and a saponification value of 206-211. The stearic acid/coconut acid blend has the composition:

TABLE II______________________________________ STEARIC COCONUT AVERAGE (wt. %) (wt. %) (wt. %)______________________________________Linoleic 1 1 1C 182 =Oleic 9 7 8C 181 =Stearic 35 2.5 19C 18Margaric 2 -- 1C 17Palmitic 50 9.5 30C 16Pentadecanoic 0.5 -- 0.25C 15Myristic 25 19 11C 14Lauric -- 52 26C 12Capric -- 4 2C 8Caprylic -- 5 2.5C 6______________________________________

Other fatty acids having approximately the above compositions are usable, and particularly as respects the coconut fatty acid. Usable fatty acids are palm kernel fatty acid (as a replacement for coconut fatty acid), and particularly palm kernel fatty acid hydrogenated to an iodine value between 8 and 15; and high iodine value vegetable oils hydrogenated to approximately the above `average` composition and to an iodine value between 8 and 15.

In the Table I formulation, glycerin imparts clarity to the soap and does not detract from its bar form hardness. Gluconic acid serves as a chelating agent for iron or its compounds which might be present in the raw materials or be transmitted from the production equipment. Normal material has no effect on the soap color. A very dark gluconic acid will darken the product very slightly. The triethanolamine in the formula acts as a buffer and reduces large fluctuations in pH. The optimum pH of a 1% solution of the soap in deionized or distilled water is 9.4. Using the maximum and minimum and minimum values of triethanolamine and NaOH, the following values were obtained for a 1% soap solution at room temperature:

TABLE III______________________________________ pH______________________________________Triethanolamine Content25.2% 9.335.2% 9.4NaoH Content4% 9.16% 9.9______________________________________

In order to determine the effectiveness of the discoloration preventing additives, samples of transparent soap with and without 0.5% Na.sub.2 S.sub.2 O.sub.5 (sodium metabisulfite) and 0.5% citric acid were prepared and set up at 180.degree. F., 120.degree. F. and at room temperature. FAC color determinations were made. The following clarity values were observed:

TABLE IV__________________________________________________________________________With Na.sub.2 S.sub.2 O.sub.5 + Citric Acid ControlRun 180.degree. F. 180.degree. F. 120.degree. F. 180.degree. F. 180.degree. F. 120.degree. F.No. Initial 1 hr. 24 hrs. 7 days Initial 1 hr. 24 hrs 7 days__________________________________________________________________________1 1 1 1 1 4 7 17 112 1 1 1 1 3 8 15 113 1 1 1 1 9 11 19 184 1 1 1 1 3 9 11 165 1 1 1 1 5 9 11 17__________________________________________________________________________

In the above, the number 1 indicates complete clarity, and higher numbers indicated progressive darkening.

FAC color determinations of certain transparent soap bars stored at room temperature, with sodium metabisulfite and citric acid contents as indicated below (and otherwise of the above Table I optimum formulation) are as follows:

TABLE IV______________________________________ Initial After 4 years______________________________________Production sample containing 0.5% 2 3Na.sub.2 S.sub.2 O.sub.5 and 0.5% citric acid______________________________________ Initial After 8 months______________________________________ OpaqueProduction sample containing 0.5% 2 19+Na.sub.2 S.sub.2 O.sub.5 but without citric acid______________________________________ Initial After 5 years______________________________________Laboratory prepared samples with0.5% Na.sub.2 S.sub.2 O.sub.5With 0.5% citric acid 2 7Without citric acid 2 19+______________________________________

Samples of transparent soap containing various levels of Na.sub.2 S.sub.2 O.sub.5 and citric acid in increments of 0.1% were tested at 180.degree. F. FAC values were determined after 1 day and after 7 days, and results were as follows:

TABLE VI______________________________________Na.sub.2 S.sub.2 O.sub.5 Citric Acid FAC(wt. %) (wt. %) 1 day 7 days______________________________________0 0 11 19+0 0.1 11B 19+0 0.2 15 19+0 0.3 11B 19+0 0.4 15 19+0 0.5 11B 19+0 0.6 11 19+0.1 0 3 19+0.1 0.1 2 19+0.1 0.2 2 19+0.1 0.3 3 19+0.1 0.4 2 19+0.1 0.5 1 19+0.1 0.6 2 19+0.2 0 1 110.2 0.1 1 11C0.2 0.2 1 11C0.2 0.3 1 11C0.2 0.4 1 170.2 0.5 1 170.2 0.6 1 13______________________________________

From the above, it is clear that the best results were obtained when both Na.sub.2 S.sub.2 O.sub.5 (sodium metabisulfite) and citric acid weight percentages were about 0.5, in the composition designated optimum in TABLE I.

Examples of the perfume used in TABLE I are as follows:

1. International Flavors and Fragrances' Novelty #567.

2. International Flavors and Fragrances' Cantata R-2.

3. Firmenich Oil Compound 39.043/NY.

4. Naarden International's Citrus 72.

5. A blend of 49 fragrance components, the principal ones being geraniol, anistic aldehyde, benzyl acetate, musk xylol, phenyl ethyl alcohol, eugenol, linalyl acetate, alpha amyl cinnamic aldehyde, coumarin, and amyl salicylate.

6. A blend of components which includes citrol acetate, Citrogen K, Lemongrass Oil, and dimethyl acetal.

Claims

1. A transparent soap composition characterized by improved stability against darkening and loss of transparency, consisting essentially of

(a) over 50% by weight of a complex mixture of the sodium and triethanolamine salts of a fatty acid or acids having from 6 to 18 carbon atoms and an iodine value of 8-15,

(b) between 0.1 and 1.0 weight percent of a member or members selected from the group consisting of citric acid, sodium citrate and potassium citrate,

(c) between 0.3 and 1.0 weight percent of a member or members selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, and potassium metabisulfite, and

(d) water,

(e) the sum of the weight precentages of the (b) and (c) composition members being at least about 0.5 weight percent.

2. The soap of claim 1 having solid bar configuration.

3. The soap of claim 1 having transparent solid form.

4. The soap of claim 1 wherein said fatty acid is selected from the group consisting of coconut fatty acid and stearic acid.

5. The soap of claim 1 wherein said fatty acid consists of

(i) between 18 and 22 weight percent coconut fatty acid, and

(ii) between 15 and 21 weight percent stearic acid.

6. The soap of claim 1 wherein said fatty acid consists of

(i) about 20.2 weight percent coconut fatty acid, and

(ii) about 20.2 weight percent stearic acid.

7. The soap of claim 5 wherein said composition includes between 10 and 16 weight percent glycerine.

8. The soap of claim 5 wherein the composition includes between 0.1 and 1.0 weight percent gluconic acid.

9. The soap of claim 5 wherein said composition includes about 0.2 weight percent of 50% gluconic acid.

10. The soap of claim 1 wherein said fatty acids include caprylic acid, capric acid, lauric acid, myristic acid, pentadecanoic acid, palmitic acid, margaric acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, and linoleic acid.

11. The soap of claim 10 wherein said fatty acids have the following relative weight percentages:

______________________________________caprylic about 2.5capric about 2.0lauric about 26.0myristic about 11.0pentadecanoic about 0.25palmitic about 30.0margaric about 1.0stearic about 19.0oleic about 8.0linoleic about 1.0______________________________________

12. A transparent soap composition consisting of

______________________________________ weight percent range______________________________________(a) triethanolamine 30-35(b) coconut fatty acid 18-22(c) stearic acid 15-21(d) sodium hydroxide 4.5-6.5(e) glycerine 10-16(f) 50% gluconic acid about 0.2(g) sodium metabisulfite about 0.5(h) citric acid about 0.5(i) perfume about 1.0(j) deionized water balance______________________________________

13. The soap composition of claim 12 wherein said (a)-(e) ingredients have the following weight percentage values

______________________________________(a) 30.2(b) 20.2(c) 20.2(d) 4.55(e) 12.1______________________________________

14. The soap composition of one of claims 12 and 13 in solid bar configuration.