This application is the U.S. National Stage of international patent application number PCT/FR2012/050843, filed on Apr. 18, 2012, which claims the priority benefit of French patent application number 11/54862, filed on Jun. 3, 2011, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference to the maximum extent allowable by law.
1. Technical Field
Embodiments generally relate to systems using transponders, that is, transceivers (generally mobile) capable of communicating in a contactless and wireless manner with a terminal.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Electromagnetic transponder systems are more and more used with the coming up of mobile telecommunication devices equipped with near field communication routers (NFC). In such devices, the mobile equipment may be used both as a transponder reader, for example, as a contactless chip card reader and, conversely, as an actual transponder for a near field communication with a terminal, for example, another mobile device, an access terminal, etc.
A recurring issue in the use of electromagnetic transponders is, for the quality of the communication, the distance separating the transponder from the reader. In particular, a natural reflex of the bearer of the transponder (for example, of the contactless chip card) is to press the card against the reader surface. This pressure may even be strong enough to fold the card. This results in mechanical stress on the chip card, which is capable of damaging the antenna generally formed of a conductive winding embedded in the card, or of damaging the contacts between the antenna and the chip.
Further, the positioning of the transponder is often not optimal for the system operation.
It would be desirable to have means enabling to avoid that a user submits a transponder to unnecessary mechanical stress.
It would further be desirable to optimize the communication between a transponder (be it a chip card or a mobile device equipped with an NFC router operating as a transponder) and a terminal.
An embodiment provides a method for assisting the positioning of an electromagnetic transponder by a user with respect to a terminal, wherein:
a current value of a ratio of the current coupling factor between the transponder and the terminal to an optimum coupling factor with a first resistive load value is calculated and stored;
said current value is compared with a preceding value of this ratio, stored in a previous iteration; and
data elements intended for the user are controlled according to said comparison.
According to an embodiment, the values of said ratio are obtained after the measurements:
of a first value of a D.C. voltage provided by a rectifier across an oscillating circuit of the transponder for a first value of the resistive load of this oscillating circuit; and
of a second value of said voltage for a second resistive load value.
According to an embodiment, said current value is further compared with two thresholds.
According to an embodiment, the thresholds are selected according to operating parameters around the optimum coupling position in which the communication between the transponder and the terminal is considered to be optimal.
According to an embodiment, when said current value is between the two thresholds, the terminal notifies the user to no longer modify the distance to the terminal.
According to an embodiment, said current value is successively compared with the two thresholds to define whether the user should increase or decrease the distance between the terminal and the transponder.
An embodiment provides an electromagnetic transponder comprising means capable of implementing the above method.
An embodiment provides a cell phone comprising a transponder.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages will be discussed in detail in the following non-limiting description of specific embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The same elements have been designated with the same reference numerals in the different drawings. For clarity, only those steps and elements which are useful to the understanding of the described embodiments have been shown and will be detailed. In particular, the origin and the destination of the data transmitted in communications between a transponder and a terminal have not been detailed, the described embodiments being compatible with any usual communication.
The terminal may take different forms, for example, a transport ticket validation terminal, an electronic passport reader, a laptop computer, a mobile communication device (GSM phone, PDA, etc.), an electronic control unit for starting an automobile vehicle, etc.
The transponder may also take different forms, for example, a chip card, an electronic transport ticket, an electronic passport, a telecommunication terminal (cell phone or smartphone, PDA, etc.), an electronic tag, etc.
Terminal 1 comprises an oscillating circuit, generally in series, formed of an inductance L1 in series with a capacitor C1 and a resistor R1. This series oscillating circuit is, in the example of
Capacitive element C1 is, for example, a variable-capacitance element controllable by a signal CTRL. This element takes part in the phase regulation of current I1 in antenna L1 with respect to a reference signal. This regulation is a regulation of the high-frequency signal, that is, of the carrier signal corresponding to the signal provided to amplifier 14 in the absence of data Tx to be transmitted. The regulation is performed by varying capacitance C1 of the oscillating circuit of the terminal to maintain the current in antenna L1 in constant phase relationship with the reference signal. This reference signal, for example, corresponds to signal OSC provided to modulator 16. Signal CTRL originates from a circuit 17 (COMP) having the function of detecting the phase interval with respect to the reference signal and of accordingly modifying the capacitance of element C1. The comparator receives data MES relative to current I1 in the oscillating circuit, detected by measurement element 15 (for example, an intensity transformer or a resistor).
A transponder 2, capable of cooperating with terminal 1, comprises an oscillating circuit, for example, parallel, formed of an inductance L2 in parallel with a capacitor C2 between two terminals 21 and 22. The parallel oscillating circuit (called receive mode resonant circuit) is intended to capture a magnetic field generated by oscillating circuit L1-C1 of terminal 1. Circuits L2-C2 and L1-C1 are tuned to a same resonance frequency (for example, 13.56 MHz). Terminals 21 and 22 are connected to two A.C. input terminals of a rectifying bridge 23 (most often, fullwave). The rectified output terminals of bridge 23 respectively define a positive terminal 24 and a reference terminal 25. A capacitor Ca is connected between terminals 24 and 25 to smooth the rectified voltage. The recovered power is used to recharge a battery, not shown.
When transponder 2 is in the field of terminal 1, a high-frequency voltage is generated across resonant circuit L2-C2. This voltage, rectified by bridge 23 and smoothed by capacitor Ca, provides a supply voltage to electronic circuits of the transponder via a voltage regulator 26 (REG). Such circuits generally comprise a processing unit 27 (for example, a microcontroller μC) associated with a memory (not shown), a demodulator 28 (DEM) of the signals that may have been received from terminal 1, and a modulator 29 (MOD) for transmitting data to the terminal. The transponder is generally synchronized by means of a clock (CLK) extracted, by a block 20, from the high-frequency signal recovered, before rectification, from one of terminals 21 and 22. Most often, all the electronic circuits of transponder 2 are integrated in a same chip.
To transmit data from terminal 1 to transponder 2, circuit 16 modulates (generally in amplitude) the carrier (signal OSC) according to signal Tx. On the transponder side, these data are demodulated by demodulator 28 based on voltage VCa across capacitor Ca. The demodulator may sample the signal to be demodulated upstream of the rectifying bridge.
To transmit data from transponder 2 to terminal 1, modulator 29 controls a stage 30 of modulation (retromodulation) of the load formed by the transponder circuits on the magnetic field generated by the terminal. This stage is generally formed of an electronic switch K30 (for example, a transistor) and of a resistor R30 (or a capacitor), in series between terminals 24 and 25. Switch K30 is controlled at a so-called sub-carrier frequency (for example, 847.5 kHz), much lower (generally with a ratio of at least 10) than the frequency of the excitation signal of the oscillating circuit of terminal 1. When switch K30 is on, the oscillating circuit of the transponder is submitted to an additional damping with respect to the load formed by circuits 20, 26, 27, 28, and 29 so that the transponder samples a greater amount of power from the high-frequency magnetic field. On the side of terminal 1, amplifier 14 maintains the amplitude of the high-frequency excitation signal at a constant level. Accordingly, the power variation of the transponder translates as an amplitude and phase variation of the current in antenna L1. This variation is detected by an amplitude or phase demodulator of the terminal. In the embodiment illustrated in
Many variations exist to encode/decode and modulate/demodulate communications between a transponder and a terminal.
The response time of the phase regulation loop is selected to be sufficiently long to avoid disturbing the possible retromodulation from a transponder and sufficiently short as compared with the speed at which a transponder passes in the field of the terminal. One can speak of a static regulation with respect to the modulation frequencies (for example, a 13.56-MHz frequency of the remote supply carrier and a 847.5-kHz retromodulation frequency) used to transmit data from the transponder to the terminal.
An example of phase regulation terminal is described in document EP-A-0857981. The fact that the phase is regulated on the terminal side enables to exploit current and voltage measurements in the oscillating circuit of the transponder to deduce therefrom information relative to the coupling of the transponder when it is in the field of a terminal.
Such information takes into account, in particular, the coupling between the transponder and the terminal, that is, the coefficient of the coupling between the oscillating circuit of the terminal and that of the transponder. This coupling coefficient essentially depends on the distance separating the transponder from the terminal. The coupling coefficient, designated as k, between the oscillating circuits of a transponder and of a terminal, always ranges between 0 and 1. The position where the transponder is placed against the terminal is considered as the maximum coupling position. Indeed, the antennas of the transponder and of the terminal cannot be brought closer to each other, unless the terminal package is eliminated.
In the embodiments which will be described, different relations between the electric quantities measurable by the transponder in different configurations of operation with a terminal are used to assist the user in positioning the transponder with respect to the terminal.
It is now known that an optimum coupling position kopt, corresponding to the position at which voltage VC2 recovered across the transponder (more specifically across its antenna) is maximum, exists between the terminal and the transponder. This optimum coupling position does not necessarily correspond to the maximum coupling position.
The curve starts from the origin of ordinates (zero voltage) for a zero coupling. This corresponds to a distance from the transponder to the terminal such that no signal can be sensed by the transponder. Voltage VC2 reaches a maximum VC2opt for an optimum coupling coefficient kopt (k/kopt=1), and then decreases to an intermediate value VC2(1) reached at coupling 1. The maximum coupling position is at a given location of this curve, but not necessarily at the optimum coupling position. This in particular depends on the different values of the capacitive and resistive elements.
Other remarkable points of the curve of
on the transponder side.
Relations expressing the value of voltage VC2 according to the ratio of the current coupling to the optimum coupling and linking the value of the equivalent resistor to the load formed by the transponder elements on its own oscillating circuit have become usual. This equivalent resistor is generally called R2. Resistor R2 represents the equivalent resistor of all the circuits (microprocessor, retromodulation means, etc.) of transponder 2, placed in parallel on capacitor C2 and inductance L2 (before or after the rectifying bridge). The conductance due to the transponder circuits, and thus their power consumption, is also called “resistive load”. The level of this load is symbolized by resistor R2 across the oscillating circuit.
Relations linking these relative values to the coupling and to different values taken by resistance R2 are provided, for example, in document EP-A-2276643 (B9617-09-RO-119).
It is provided to exploit these relations to assist the user holding the transponder in placing it at an optimal distance from the terminal or reader to optimize the communication.
For a given coupling value k, considering that the impedance of the oscillating circuit of the terminal does not vary and that the circuits remain tuned, the ratio of current coefficients k to optimum coefficients kopt]R20 and kopt]R21, respectively for a resistor R2 of value R20 and of value R21, may be expressed (for example, by exploiting the relations indicated in the above-mentioned document), as:
Still in the same conditions, the square of the ratio, noted r, of current coefficient k to optimum coefficient kopt]R20, according to voltages VC2]R20 and VC2]R21 of voltage VC2, respectively for values R20 and R21 of resistor R2, may be written as:
When the coupling is optimum with resistor R21 (k=kopt]R21), the following may also be written:
These relations enable, by varying the value of resistance R2, to indicate to the bearer of the transponder an optimal distance with respect to the terminal or reader.
Terminal 1 is assumed to be a mobile telecommunication device of cell phone type and transponder 2 is assumed to be a chip card. All that will be described however also applies to the case where the transponder is a telecommunication terminal equipped with an NFC router and where terminal 1 is another mobile device operating in reader mode or is a fixed terminal, etc. It should be noted that, when it is spoken of bringing the transponder closer to or further away from the terminal, this may correspond to moving a terminal away from or closer to the transponder, for example, in the case of a fixed transponder (transponder integrated to posters or the like).
According to this embodiment, the information relative to current coupling k with respect to the optimum coupling with two values R20 and R21 of resistor R2 is exploited to determine whether the transponder needs to be brought closer to or further away from the terminal.
The example of
The implementation of the described embodiments requires for the transponder (the system element behaving as a transponder) to be equipped with visual or sound warning means. For example, if the phone-type mobile device playing the role of terminal 1 in
To simplify the discussion of
It is started (block 41, MES VC2]R20) by measuring and storing the voltage across capacitor C2 with a first value R20 of capacitance R2.
Then (block 42, R20->R21), the value of resistive element R2 is switched to a lower value R21. As a variation, the value of resistance R2 is modified towards a lower value R2.
Then (block 43, MES VC2]R21), voltage V2 is measured with the value of resistance R21, which is stored.
The present value of the ratio of coupling k to the optimum value with resistance R20, squared (block 44, ri2=(k/kopt]R20)i2, is then calculated and stored. This calculation is performed, for example, according to the above formula 2.
The present ratio is then compared (block 45, ri=ri−i?) with ratio ri−1 calculated at the previous iteration (i−1). This test amounts to determining whether the distance between the transponder and the terminal varies. It should be noted that the squares of the ratios can then be directly compared.
If the distance varies (output N of block 45), that is, the user moves one of the two elements with respect to the other, it is determined whether ratio ri is within an acceptable range defined by two thresholds MIN and MAX, that is, around the optimum coupling with an acceptable tolerance. To achieve this, it is for example started by determining whether ratio ri is lower than lower threshold MIN (block 46, ri<MIN?). If it is (output Y of block 46), this means that the two elements have to be brought closer to each other (block 47, REDUCE DISTANCE). If it is not (output N of block 46), current value ri is compared with the maximum threshold (block 48, ri>MAX?). If maximum threshold MAX is exceeded (output Y of block 48), this means that the transponder should be moved away from the terminal (block 49, INCREASE DISTANCE) since the optimum coupling point has been passed.
In both cases, a subsequent measurement is performed (it is proceeded to a next iteration) to verify whether the user has effectively taken the instruction into account (block 50, NEXTi).
If the transponder is within the acceptable distance range (output N of block 48), it is displayed or indicated to the user that this position is correct and the he does not need to move any more (block 51, STOP).
If the transponder no longer moves with respect to the terminal (output Y of block 45), its position with respect to the optimum coupling is examined. For example, it is started by checking whether it is too distant (block 52, ri<MIN?). If it is (output Y of block 52), this means that, although the transponder has been pressed against the terminal, the optimum coupling position cannot be reached by bringing the transponder closer, generally because of the terminal package. The user is then requested to stop (block 51).
If the motionless position corresponds to a position greater than the minimum (output N of block 52), it is checked (block 53, ri>MAX?) whether ratio ri is greater than the maximum value. If it is (output Y of block 53), the user is notified that he should move the transponder away from the terminal (block 49). If it is not, he is told to no longer move (block 51) since the present position then is within the acceptable range.
As a variation, tests 52 and 53 are omitted and it is directly proceeded to block 51 at the affirmative output (Y) of test 45.
The selection of thresholds MIN and MAX depends on the application and is also performed to provide a hysteresis, which avoids that the notification system permanently varies. Indeed, it could have been devised to directly compare the threshold with the optimum coupling. However, this would in practice result, due to the fact that the object is held by a user and thus sensitive to the displacement of his hand, in an unstable system.
The thresholds may be, for example, generated by resistive dividing bridges or are pre-calculated and stored in a non-volatile memory of the transponder for a numerical comparison.
According to an embodiment, the switchable resistor corresponds to that used for a resistive retromodulation. A first measurement is performed by switching the retromodulation resistor so that it is functionally in the circuit (switch 40) in the on state in the example of
As a variation, the increase or the decrease of equivalent resistance R2 is caused by a variation of the power consumption of the transponder circuits, typically of processing unit 27. For example, to decrease the value of resistance R2 (to increase the power consumption), the execution of calculations or processing by unit 27 is triggered. Equivalent resistance R2 may also be increased by decreasing the consumption of unit 27 by interrupting certain calculations.
Various embodiments have been described, and many alterations, modifications, and improvements will occur to those skilled in the art. In particular, the selection of the thresholds acceptable for ratio ri and of the periodicity of the measurements and iterations is within the abilities of those skilled in the art according to the application. Further, the inequality relations may correspond to strict or non-strict inequalities. Further, other notification means than sound or visual indicators may be used. For example, a system causing a vibration of the transponder in the case where it is a mobile telecommunication device equipped with an NFC router and stopping the vibration when the reached position is correct or, conversely, causing a vibration thereof once this reached position is correct, may be provided.
Further, the practical implementation of embodiments is within the abilities of those skilled in the art based on the functional indications given hereabove and by using hardware and software tools currently present in transponder systems. It should be noted that the implementation of these embodiments requires no modification of the terminal and is only performed on the transponder side.
Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only and is not intended to be limiting. The present invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and the equivalents thereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11 54862 | Jun 2011 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2012/050843 | 4/18/2012 | WO | 00 | 12/3/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/164179 | 12/6/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5703573 | Fujimoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6356198 | Wuidart et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6462647 | Roz | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473028 | Luc | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6547149 | Wuidart et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6650226 | Wuidart et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650229 | Wuidart et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6703921 | Wuidart et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6784785 | Wuidart et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6879246 | Wuidart | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6944424 | Heinrich et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950008 | Hagl et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960985 | Wuidart | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7005967 | Wuidart | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7046121 | Wuidart | May 2006 | B2 |
7049935 | Wuidart et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7049936 | Wuidart | May 2006 | B2 |
7058357 | Wuidart et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7107008 | Wuidart | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7263330 | Wuidart | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7606532 | Wuidart | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7995965 | Wuidart | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8130159 | Wuidart et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8395485 | Wuidart | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8446259 | Wuidart | May 2013 | B2 |
8482388 | Wuidart | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8564413 | Wuidart | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8676163 | Wuidart | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8718552 | Wuidart | May 2014 | B2 |
8798533 | Wuidart | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8907761 | Wuidart | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8922338 | Wuidart | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8922341 | Wuidart | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8988196 | Wuidart | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9098788 | Wuidart | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20030071717 | Hagl et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030121985 | Baldischweiler | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030169169 | Wuidart et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040104809 | Rizzo et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050001609 | Cuylen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050141256 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050231328 | Castle et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060172702 | Wuidart et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070164122 | Ju | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080079542 | Rofougaran | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080129509 | Duron | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136643 | Yeo et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080204206 | Frohler | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090065575 | Phillips et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090273452 | Wuidart | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100068999 | Bangs et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100283698 | Orihara | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291871 | Butler | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100323629 | Wuidart | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328045 | Goto | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110095769 | Wuidart | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110140852 | Wuidart | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110193688 | Forsell | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110319016 | Gormley et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120092901 | Wuidart | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120105012 | Wuidart | May 2012 | A1 |
20140113554 | Wuidart | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140113692 | Wuidart | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140118115 | Wuidart | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 722 094 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0857981 | Aug 1998 | EP |
1 043 677 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 071 038 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 304 661 | Apr 2003 | EP |
2077518 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2114019 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2 757 952 | Jul 1998 | FR |
2 321 725 | Aug 1998 | GB |
2464362 | Apr 2010 | GB |
2009105115 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English Translation of Written Opinion of International Searching Authority Dated Dec. 4, 2013 for corresponding International Application No. PCT/FR2012/050842, 5 pages. |
English Translation of Written Opinion of International Searching Authority dated Dec. 4, 2013 for corresponding International Application No. PCT/FR2012/050844, 6 pages. |
English Translation of Written Opinion of International Searching Authority dated Dec. 4, 2013 for corresponding International Application No. PCT/FR2012/050845, 6 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jun. 26, 2012 from corresponding International Application No. PCT/FR2012/050843. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 10, 2012 from potentially related International Application No. PCT/FR2012/050842. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 7, 2012 from potentially related International Application No. PCT/FR2012/050844. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 7, 2012 from potentially related International Application No. PCT/FR2012/050845. |
English Translation of the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Dec. 4, 2013 from corresponding International Application No. PCT/FR2012/050843. |
French Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2010, for corresponding FR Application No. 0954147, 2 pages. |
French Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2010, for corresponding FR Application No. 0954148, 2 pages. |
French Search Report dated Feb. 8, 2010, for corresponding FR Application No. 0954149, 2 pages. |
French Search Report dated Feb. 2, 2010, for corresponding FR Application No. 0954345, 2 pages. |
French Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2010, for corresponding FR Application No. 0954347, 2 pages. |
French Search Report dated Feb. 17, 2010, for corresponding FR Application No. 0954351, 2 pages. |
Translation of International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 3, 2010, for corresponding International Application No. PCT/FR2010/051090, 4 pages. |
Translation of International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 3, 2010, for corresponding International Application No. PCT/FR2010/051091, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/123,739, filed Dec. 16, 2013, Luc Wuidart. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/123,751, filed Dec. 16, 2013, Luc Wuidart. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/123,755, filed Dec. 16, 2013, Luc Wuidart. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140113692 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |